Delegates of the 30Th Congress of the European Green Party Tampere, November 8-10, 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Delegates of the 30Th Congress of the European Green Party Tampere, November 8-10, 2019 From: EGP Info [email protected] Subject: Fwd: Latvian Green Party Date: 2 November 2019 at 14:12 To: From: Martins Staks <[email protected]> Subject: Latvian Green Party Date: 1 November 2019 at 22:20:31 GMT+1 To: [email protected] Greetings, My apologies for the delayed response. We would love to add a document for the revision of the membership of the Latvian Green Party. Instead of the amendment document for the eviction vote, we would love to add a document for the revision of the membership of the Latvian Green Party. Last but not least we would like to ask for a chance to deliver a short speech regarding our previous cooperation and we would like to ask what would be the optional length of the speech. Ar cieņu/Best regrads, Mārtiņš Toms Staks Tel +371 26 62 30 77 Delegates of the 30th C…ty.docx For delegates of the 30th Congress of the European Green Party Tampere, November 8-10, 2019. Report to the European Green Party (EPP) encouraging the Latvian Green Parties 1. SUMMARY The 30th Congress of the EPP which will take place in Tampere, from 8th to 10th in November, the voting session will work on the Question has been raised about the exclusion of the Latvian Green Party from the EMP Green family. The European Green Party’s suggestion for the exclusion of the Latvian Green Party, corresponding with the activities performed by Latvian Green Party, the European Green Party revision’s evaluation is based on the following arguments: Political activity that is in opposition to the green values and the green memorandum. LGP ignoring the green and democratic principles. The lack of communication, interest and taking initiative according to the EGP. Accordingly with as seen in the text above, in the opinion of the authors of the European Green Party report, that Latvian Green Party has not complied with the following criteria for EGP’s member organizations: Promoting green, social, democratic and progressive policies; Promoting green policy that is defined with ecological, social, democratic and sustainable as well as progressive ideas; Active participation in political life and honest elections (in elections at a credible level); Apply a gender balance principle in the infrastructure of their party; Regularly attend the EGP’s meetings. The current Question about the exclusion of the LGP, which is also one of the founding members of the EGP, from EGP is to be taken very seriously. Considering that it’s the highest possible penalty, which is applied only in emergency circumstances, if the specified member countries party has discredited the green values on an international scale, causing international or national level scandals, unethically behaved against other country parties. This kind of level from LGP’s side have not been concluded hence, taking into consideration that the facts and data from the EGP’s report are the cause for the discussion whether or not LGP will take further participation in the EGP, we have concluded that for the purpose of taking a democratic and transparent decision, our obligation is to clear the LGP’s position on the situation. Whereas the delegates of Congress, which will take part in the vote, have the right to the details from LGP’s side. 2. OPERATION AND VALUES Founded in 1990, the Latvian Green Party is one of Latvia's oldest parties, the oldest science of reestablishing Latvia's independence. Independence fighters, opponents of the Soviet power and its influence were the core of the Latvian Green Party. The Green Party of Latvia has always been a voice for green ideology. Latvian Green Party is currently governed by 9 Municipalities in Latvia, with more than 80 elected officials, and have one Member of Parliament. The Latvian Green Party has had an elected prime minister. For a long time Raimonds Vejonis representative of LCS, who was co-chairman of the Latvian Green Party, directed the Ministry of the Environment, then the united Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development in Latvia as well Minister of Defense as well as on June 3, 2015 R. Vējonis was elected the State of Latvia president. In the former government, when the Greens and Farmers Union (ZZS), which is a member of the Latvian Green Party, was in a government coalition, our party had 2 ministerial portfolios- Minister of Defense and Minister of Health. We have implemented environmental policy in different ways also in these areas. The principles of environment and nature protection are the most important values of our parties’ program. We stand for biodiversity, environmental protection, national values in Latvia, traditions and culture. We defend people's right to live in green and healthy nature in Latvia. We apply these principles in party life as popularizing among members, as well as in our national political activities, so we can not agree with the claim that we violate green values in party work and belief Annual congresses of the Latvian Green Party discuss and approve green lifestyle resolutions. The latest includes glyphosate ban, bisphenol A restriction, and forest protection, world peace, promotion of potentially environmentally hazardous national objects, etc. We try to look at all the issues in the lot, exiting from the nature care point of view, stressing that nature is the core of the national identity of Latvia and our country. We stand for the protection of natural values at the Latvian level, against the felling of trees in the capital city of Riga, against air pollution. A micro-reserve to protect old boreal forest habitat from deforestation was established in 2018 by the Latvian Green Party. At this time, the Latvian Green Party will be involved in litigation against the Latvian State with a view to changing the nature of the value valuation and determination procedure in the future. This is the only example of such a precedent in Latvia-that the political party has applied for micro-restriction and, in general, fought for the protection of a protected nature zone. Representatives of the Latvian Green Party also participated in events organized by other NGOs, such as the Youth Branch of the Latvian Green Party, which participated in the youth campaign against climate change. We sponsored and coordinated the Senior Environmental Action 2017 Prayer by the Sea, the oldest environmental action in Latvia. Literally, the ancestor of the Baltic Way. In 2016, when representatives of the Latvian Green Party were in the government, they strongly urged Latvia to be absent from the legislative changes and protection of the Baltic Sea coastal forests from Rendering. As regards the statement that there is no gender balance within the party and the reference to women in the rights of the Latvian Green Party program-we point out that we always treat everyone with tolerance and respect, regardless of gender. The Latvian Green Party leadership elections are democratic-they are closed, there is no membership Quota rule for congresses, and they are open to participation by every member if he or she is nominated. The Green Party of Latvia was elected to the Board of Women. For starters, 2 candidates were nominated for the last Latvian Green Party at the 30th Congress in April 2019. The previous government, when the Green and Farmers Union (ZZS) consisting of the Latvian Green Party was in the government coalition, the Latvian Green Party was represented in the government by two ministers-one male, one female. 12th Saeima 2017 election, starting from the Green and Farmers Union Unified List, of the Latvian Green Party. The Saeima elected two deputies-one male and one woman. The Latvian Green Party has a total of 9 municipal leaders - 5 men and 4 women. The above confirms that the professional competencies of the individual are primary, the personality, not the gender division of Quotas, and the fact that women in the Latvian Green Party are knowledgeable, professional and competitive. The Latvian Green Party stands for traditional family values and marriage between a woman and a man, while at the same time being tolerant and respectful of same-sex unions or other sexual orientation. As far as criticism is concerned, part of this period can be answered. Given the limited organizational ability of the Latvian Green Party, there is a need for some organization and lack of initiative on the part of the former leader of the Latvian Green Party, as well as an intense pre-election cycle over the last 3 years. -In 2017 Latvian municipal elections, 2018 13th Saeima elections, 2019 European Parliament elections, we accept that our participation in the EFP system has not been adequate. Communion between the Green Party of Latvia and the Green Party of Europe We acknowledge that Latvian Green Party communication with the European Green Party, information about Latvian Green Party news and events, and the feedback from us has not been recent sufficient. We think this is one of the main reasons why the EFP the central structure may have given a wrong and misconception about Latvian Green Party's lack of activity and inactivity also at national level.The report states that there is information that the Latvian Green Party is implementing a green policy In Latvia has been provided (without identifying a specific person) Latvian Green Party grandmother, as well as green sector representatives (not identified). We consider reference to the following sources of information are incorrect. There is also internal opposition among members, with different views expression, which is a normal feature of democracy that is not suppressed but we cannot comment more reasonably if we do not know who provided exactly what information.
Recommended publications
  • The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party Respond to the Crisis1
    All anti-neo-liberal now? The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party respond to the crisis1 Luke March University of Edinburgh [email protected] Paper for PSA 2013 Draft version 1.0. Work very much in progress. Please do not quote without author’s permission. Why has the left failed to benefit from the post-2008 economic crisis? This is a common, but perhaps slightly unfair question. It is difficult to see any one political family as a unique beneficiary, and indeed the right’s apparent earlier ideological hegemony has become unstuck with the ‘austerity medicine’ having consistently failed to revive the European patient. Nevertheless, there is still something remarkable about socio-economic conditions that should be a ‘perfect storm’ for left-wing politics regularly failing to produce anything like a clear boon for the left. The February 2013 Italian elections are just the latest that may mark a ‘no- confidence’ vote in the Centre-Left (McDonnell and Bobba 2013). The social democratic Democratic Party (PD) and its more leftist ally, the post-communist Left Ecology Freedom threw away an apparently unassailable lead to squeak ahead of the right and Beppe Grillo’s Five-Star Movement. This paper aims to contribute to answering this overarching question by comparing the policy and ideological response to the crisis undertaken by the three ‘left’ transnational party federations (TNPs) at European level, the Party of European Socialists (PES), European Green Party (EGP) and European Left Party (EL).2 Comparing the three TNPs is an apposite approach. Although TNPs are ‘timidly rising actors’, relatively weak formations that fall far short of being fully integrated parties, they at the very least aspire to a minimal level of ideological and policy co-ordination (Bardi 2004; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Choose a Political Party
    FastFACTS How to Choose a Political Party When you sign up to vote, you can join a political party. A political party is a group of people who share the same ideas about how the government should be run and what it should do. They work together to win elections. You can also choose not to join any of the political parties and still be a voter. There is no cost to join a party. How to choose a political party: • Choose a political party that has the same general views you do. For example, some political parties think that government should No Party Preference do more for people. Others feel that government should make it If you do not want to register easier for people to do things for themselves. with a political party (you • If you do not want to join a political party, mark that box on your want to be “independent” voter registration form. This is called “no party preference.” Know of any political party), mark that if you do, you may have limited choices for party candidates in “I do not want to register Presidential primary elections. with a political party” on the registration form. In • You can change your political party registration at any time. Just fill California, you can still out a new voter registration form and check a different party box. vote for any candidate in The deadline to change your party is 15 days before the election. a primary election, except If you are not registered with a political party and for Presidential candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Party Constitution 2015
    Green Party Constitution 2015 (Following the Annual Convention 28 March 2015) Table of Contents 1. Name 2. Principles o 2.1 Basic Philosophy o 2.2 Socio-economic o 2.3 Political 3. Objective 4. Membership 5. Organisation o 5.1 Dail Constituency Groups o 5.2 Regional Groups o 5.3 Policy Council o 5.4 Standing Committees o 5.5 Executive Committee: Tasks o 5.6 Executive Committee: Composition o 5.7 Party Leader o 5.8 The Dail Party o 5.9 Appeals Committee o 5.10 Cathaoirleach 6. Decision-making and Policy Development 7. National Conventions 8. Finance 9. Public Representatives 10. Revision of Constitution and Standing Orders 11. Operative Date and 12. Transition INDEX 1. NAME The name shall be the Green Party - Comhaontas Glas hereinafter referred to as the Party. 2. PRINCIPLES In these principles we assert the interdependence of all life, and the role of the Green movement in establishing appropriate relationships in this web of interdependence. While respecting the human person, we recognise and celebrate our interdependence with other species. We oppose the destructive processes which are destroying our planet. We favour a balanced and sustainable system of production and utilisation of resources, keeping account of real costs. The task before us is to transform the vision of continued viable life on earth into reality. 2.1 Basic Philosophy 2.1.1 The impact of society on the environment should not be ecologically disruptive. 2.1.2 Conservation of resources is vital to a sustainable society. 2.1.3 We have the responsibility to pass the Earth on to our successors in a fit and healthy state.
    [Show full text]
  • European Political Parties and Foundations: the ’Tissue’ That Connects?
    EUROPEAN POLITICAL PARTIES AND FOUNDATIONS: THE ’TISSUE’ THAT CONNECTS? POLICY BRIEF | NOVEMBER 2019 https://eurac.tv/9R2x EUROPEAN POLITICAL PARTIES AND FOUNDATIONS: THE ’TISSUE’ THAT CONNECTS? To the average European citizen, the political groups in the POLICY BRIEF | NOVEMBER 2019 European Parliament, which help shape EU-wide legislation, are https://eurac.tv/9R2x a vaguely familiar concept. But there is much less knowledge of the European political parties (as opposed to groups) and the think-tanks that are affiliated to them. The dominant players have traditionally been the European People’s Party (EPP), the Party of European Socialists (PES), and the Federation of Liberal and Democrat parties (renamed ALDE in 2012), all of which were formed in the 1970s, as confederations of national parties from across the European Union. They were joined by the European Green Party and the Party of the European Left in 2004, and then by the European Conservatives and Reformists Party in 2009. Part of that eco-system are the foundations/think-tanks, which are affiliated to each of the parties, based in part on the German Stiftung model, bringing together the think-tanks at the national level. The parties then also have women and youth networks. So what role do the European political parties and foundations play? How do they interact with the European Parliament groups and Commissioners, and how do they affect political and policy co-ordination in Brussels and across national capitals? NOV. 2019 | POLICY BRIEF | EUROPEAN POLITICAL PARTIES AND FOUNDATIONS: THE ’TISSUE’ THAT CONNECTS? | EURACTIV 3 European Political Parties and Foundations: The ’tissue’ that connects? By Benjamin Fox | EURACTIV.com THE BRIDGE FROM THE BUBBLE own pre-Council summits and ministerial meetings by sector.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Professionalization of Green Parties?
    Professionalization of Green parties? Analyzing and explaining changes in the external political approach of the Dutch political party GroenLinks Lotte Melenhorst (0712019) Supervisor: Dr. A. S. Zaslove 5 September 2012 Abstract There is a relatively small body of research regarding the ideological and organizational changes of Green parties. What has been lacking so far is an analysis of the way Green parties present them- selves to the outside world, which is especially interesting because it can be expected to strongly influence the image of these parties. The project shows that the Dutch Green party ‘GroenLinks’ has become more professional regarding their ‘external political approach’ – regarding ideological, or- ganizational as well as strategic presentation – during their 20 years of existence. This research pro- ject challenges the core idea of the so-called ‘threshold-approach’, that major organizational changes appear when a party is getting into government. What turns out to be at least as interesting is the ‘anticipatory’ adaptations parties go through once they have formulated government participation as an important party goal. Until now, scholars have felt that Green parties are transforming, but they have not been able to point at the core of the changes that have taken place. Organizational and ideological changes have been investigated separately, whereas in the case of Green parties organi- zation and ideology are closely interrelated. In this thesis it is argued that the external political ap- proach of GroenLinks, which used to be a typical New Left Green party but that lacks governmental experience, has become more professional, due to initiatives of various within-party actors who of- ten responded to developments outside the party.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Agreement Between the Swedish Social Democratic Party, the Moderate Party, the Swedish Green Party, the Centre Party and the Christian Democrats
    Framework agreement between the Swedish Social Democratic Party, the Moderate Party, the Swedish Green Party, the Centre Party and the Christian Democrats Pillars Sweden’s energy policy should build on the same three pillars as energy cooperation in the EU. The policy therefore aims to combine: • ecological sustainability • competitiveness • security of supply Sweden must have a robust electricity network with high security of supply and low environmental impact, and offer electricity at competitive prices. This creates a long- term perspective and clarity for actors in the market and helps generate new jobs and investment in Sweden. The energy policy is based on the fact that Sweden is closely linked to its neighbours in northern Europe, and aims to find joint solutions to challenges in the common electricity market. Targets By 2045, Sweden is to have no net emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and should thereafter achieve negative emissions. The target by 2040 is 100 per cent renewable electricity production. This is a target, not a deadline for banning nuclear power, nor does mean closing nuclear power plants through political decisions. An energy-efficiency target for the period 2020 to 2030 will be produced and adopted no later than 2017. Conditions on the Swedish electricity market Better conditions are needed for investments in renewable energy, energy technologies and energy efficiency. Development of the energy system should be based on a variety of large- and small-scale renewable production that is tailored to local and industrial needs. One major challenge is converting energy policy from focusing almost exclusively on the amount of energy delivered (TWh) to also ensuring sufficient output (MW).
    [Show full text]
  • ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles the Future Is Green
    The future is green. ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles The future is green. ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles Preamble 7 I. Our values 7 Ecology is sustainability 8 Freedom is realised through self-determination 8 Extending equitability 9 Democracy is the basis 10 The touchstone of our values: Human rights and non-violence 11 II. Challenges in a changing world 12 III. Where we come from – who we are 16 IV. Twelve for 2020 17 Towards the ecological age 18 I. The fundamental principles of our environmental policy 19 II. Sustainable development as a principle for action 20 III. Economical use of resources and the efficiency revolution 21 IV. Ecology and lifestyle 22 V. New energy – from the fossil and nuclear age to the solar future 22 A key project: Towards the solar age 24 Sustainable development in towns and local areas 25 VI. Environmentally-friendly traffic systems 27 A key project: Ecologically mobile 29 1 The future is green. VII. Nature and landscape conservancy 30 VIII. Animals need rights 31 IX. A global perspective for the environment and development 32 Towards an ecological and social market economy 34 I. The foundations of our economic policy 35 A key project: The future of a united Germany 38 II. Market economy and regulative policy 39 A key project: Transparency for consumers 40 III. Ecological fiscal reform 40 IV. Consumer protection 41 V. The knowledge economy 41 VI. Regional economies 42 A key project: A new form of agriculture 43 VII. A sustainable fiscal policy 45 VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charter and Constitution of the Australian Greens May 2020 Charter
    The Charter and Constitution of the Australian Greens May 2020 Charter .......................................................................................................................................................................3 Basis of The Charter ..............................................................................................................................................3 Ecology ..................................................................................................................................................................3 Democracy.............................................................................................................................................................3 Social Justice .........................................................................................................................................................3 Peace ....................................................................................................................................................................3 An Ecologically Sustainable Economy ....................................................................................................................4 Meaningful Work ....................................................................................................................................................4 Culture ...................................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • International Greens
    GPUS STRATEGIC PLAN 2013 REPORT INTERNATIONAL GREEN PARTIES 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Greens in Countries With Proportional Rep vs. Winner-Take-All ............................................................................................................. 3 How Canada Beat The System ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Expansive Platform Outreach ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Targeting Races and Resources .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Policy Development .................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Policy Decision-making In Various Countries ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Overall Decision Making Structure ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 Membership .............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
    [Show full text]