Final TE Report ILCCP Project Jan 27 2013.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TERMINAL EVALUATION of the UNDP/GEF – Supported Project “Integrated Livestock and Crop Conservation Programme” Bhutan UNDP Project ID: 48573 GEF Project ID: 2911 Yak Herders: Photo by Dr. JigmeSoyabean Product: Photo by Lhab Tshering Buckwheat field: Photo by Lhab Tshering Gene Bank, NBC Evaluation Time Frame: 19 work days (November 21-December 31, 2012) Date of Submission of TE Report: Draft submitted 12/31/12; Final on 1/23/13 GEF Focal Area, Operational Program: Biodiversity, OP # 13 (Agrobiodiversity) GEF Implementing Agency: United Nations Development Programme Project Executing Agency: National Biodiversity Center of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forests Evaluation Team: Ms. Virginia Ravndal, International Consultant & Team Leader ([email protected]) Dr. Udyog Subedi, National Consultant ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Terminal Evaluation Team (TET) would like to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to all those who patiently took part in interviews and provided helpful information, and without whose participation, this Terminal Evaluation (TE) would not be meaningful. Their contributions are greatly appreciated, and the perspectives and information they generously shared with the TET was crucial to the conduct of this evaluation. The TET would like to especially thank the National Biodiversity Center (NBC) for the time and hard work it put into gathering additional information not previously compiled but important to the TE, and for its patience and understanding of changes made to the proposed TE mission itinerary. A special thanks to Dr. Tashi Yangzome Dorji, Program Director, Ms. Asta Tamang, Project Manager, and to Dr. Jigme Dorji, Senior Biodiversity Officer and Mr. Lhab Tshering, Biodiversity Officer, the latter two who accompanied the TET on the field visit to Bumthang, sharing much helpful information along the way. The Evaluation Team would also like to thank the personnel of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Bhutan for their helpful inputs and insights and for the logistical support provided. Special thanks are given to Mr. Tashi Dorji, Programme Analyst, Mr. Karma Lodey Rapten, ARR, and Wangchen Norbu, Logistics Assistant. The TET would also like to express its gratitude to the UNDP/GEF Regional Technical Advisor in Bangkok, Mr. Sameer Karki, for his helpful inputs. The International Consultant and Team Leader, Ms. Virginia Ravndal, would like to thank the National Consultant, Dr. Udyog Subedi, for his always positive attitude, his dedication to a good product, his hard work which far surpassed his TOR, and the openness with which he shared his extensive experience and knowledge. He was a joy to work with, and this evaluation benefited greatly from his being part of the team. Finally, the TET thanks our excellent driver, Mr. Mani Tamang for taking us safely to Bumthang and ensuring that all the necessary paperwork was in order before leaving. He drove long hours with few breaks and was always cheerful and helpful. Bhutan – ILCC Project Terminal Evaluation Report 1 ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY Acronyms ABC Agrobiodivesity Conservation Project ADAO Assistant District Agriculture Officer AEO Agriculture Extension Officer AnGR Animal Genetic Resources APR Annual Progress Report BD Biodiversity BUCAP Biodiversity Use and Conservation in Asia Program CPAP Country Programme Action Plan CNR College of Natural Resources CWR Crop Wild Relatives DANIDA Danish International Development Agency DAMC Department of Agriculture Marketing and Cooperative DAO District Agriculture Officer DLO District Livestock Officer DOA Department of Agriculture DOFPS Department of Forests and Park Services DOL Department of Livestock EA Executing Agency FYP Five Year Plan GEF Global Environment Facility GNHC Gross National Happiness Commission HWC Human Wildlife Conflict IA Implementing Agency IFAD International Fund for Agriculture Development ILCCP Integrated Livestock and Crop Conservation Programme JICA Japanese International Cooperation Agency LEO Livestock Extension Officer M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MDGs Millennium Development Goals METT Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool MoAF Ministry of Agriculture and Forests MTE Mid-term Evaluation NBC National Biodiversity Centre NCIS National Cattle Information System NFI National Forest Inventory NHBP National Horse Breeding Programme NLBP National Livestock Breeding Programme OP Operational Programme PB Project Board PDF Project Development Facility PGR Plant Genetic Resources PIR Project Implementation Report Bhutan – ILCC Project Terminal Evaluation Report 2 PMU Project Management Unit PPD Policy and Planning Division RGOB Royal Government of Bhutan RNR Renewable Natural Resources RNR-RDCs Renewable Natural Resources Research and Development Centers ROtI Review of Outcomes to Impacts SGP Small Grant Programme SLM Sustainable Land Management SNV Netherlands Development Organization TE Terminal Evaluation TET Terminal Evaluation Team TOR Terms of Reference UNDAF UN Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United nations environmental Programme USAID United States Agency for International Development Glossary Dzongkhag District Gewog A block in a District consisting of several villages Nublang An indigenous breed of cattle to Bhutan Bhutan – ILCC Project Terminal Evaluation Report 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................................... 1 ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 6 PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE ............................................................................................................................................... 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................................... 6 TERMINAL EVALUATION RATINGS ASSIGNED TO THE PROJECT .................................................................................................. 7 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND LESSONS ......................................................................................... 15 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 16 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS EVALUATION .......................................................................................................................... 16 1.2 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY OF THE EVALUATION .................................................................................................. 16 1.3 EVALUATION TEAM COMPOSITION ..................................................................................................................... 18 1.4 STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT .............................................................................................................................. 18 1.5 CODE OF CONDUCT ADHERED TO BY THE TET ....................................................................................................... 18 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ................................................................................ 19 2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DURATION .............................................................................................................. 19 2.2 PROBLEMS THAT THE PROJECT SOUGHT TO ADDRESS .............................................................................................. 19 2.3 IMMEDIATE AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................. 20 2.4 CHANGES MADE TO THE PROJECT DESIGN ............................................................................................................ 20 2.5 EXPECTED RESULTS INCLUDING INDICATORS AND TARGETS ...................................................................................... 21 2.6 MAIN STAKEHOLDERS ...................................................................................................................................... 23 3. FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.1 PROJECT DESIGN AND FORMULATION ................................................................................................................. 23 3.1.1 Assessment of Project Logic, Strategic Approach, and Scope ................................................................ 23 3.1.2 Assessment of Project Logical Framework ............................................................................................. 26 3.1.3 The design of the Project M&E Plan, including Development of the Baseline ....................................... 27 3.1.4 Linkages with other Interventions in the Sector within the Country ...................................................... 28 3.1.5 Lessons from relevant Initiatives incorporated into Project Design ......................................................