DOCSLIB.ORG

Hampton Roads 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan HRTPO BOARD VOTING MEMBERS Include a Representative from the Following

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Hampton Roads 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan HRTPO BOARD VOTING MEMBERS INCLUDE A representative from THE FOLLOWING: AN ELECTED OFFICIAL FROM EACH LOCALITY: Chesapeake James City County Southampton County Franklin Newport News Suffolk Gloucester County Norfolk Virginia Beach Hampton Poquoson Williamsburg Isle of Wight County Portsmouth York County PUBLIC TRANSIT AGENCIES: STATE AGENCIES: Hampton Roads Transit Virginia Department of Transportation Williamsburg Area Transit Authority Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Virginia Port Authority VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY: Two members of the Virginia State Senate Two members of the Virginia House of Delegates HRTPO BOARD NON-VOTING MEMBERS INCLUDE A representative from THE FOLLOWING: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS FOR FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION ALL MEMBER LOCALITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE CO-CHAIR ADVISORY COMMITTEE CHAIR FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION VIrgINIA DEparTMENT OF AVIATION MILITARY LIAISONS FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION NORFOLK AIRPORT AUTHORITY INIVTED PARTICIpaNTS FROM THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION PENINSULA AIRPORT AUTHORITY BOARD HRTPO PROJECT STAFF ROBERT A. CRUM, JR. SARA KIDD, GISP EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER CAMELIA RAVANBAKHT, PH.D. KENDALL L. MILLER DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND TITLE VI ADMINISTRATOR DALE M. STITH, AICP, GISP ROBERT COFIELD PRINCIPAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNER WEB AND GRAPHICS DESIGNER THERESA K. BROOKS SHIRLEY CORE TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER II ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT II LEONARDO PINEDA II MICHAEL R. LONG TRANSPORTATION PLANNER GENERAL SERVICES MANAGER KEITH NICHOLS, P.E. CHRISTOPHER VAIGNEUR PRINCIPAL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER ASSISTANT GENERAL SERVICES MANAGER 2040 LONG-RANGE TRANSPOrtATION PLAN THE REGIONAL TRANSPOrtATION PLAN FOR HAMPTON ROADS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS REGIONAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................................... 1 WHAT IS AN LRTP?.................................................................................................... 2 UPDATING THE LRTP .................................................................................................. 2 2040 LRTP VISION STATEMENT AND GOALS ..................................................................... 4 CURRENT STATE OF TRANSPORTATION IN THE REGION ............................................................. 6 THE SHAPE AND PATTERN OF FUTURE GROWTH .................................................................... 9 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN ............................................................................ 10 PLAN PERFORMANCE .................................................................................................. 14 PLAN HIGHLIGHTS ..................................................................................................... 15 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 16 WHAT’S NEXT? ....................................................................................................... 17 FOR MORE INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 18 REGIONAL OVERVIEW Hampton Roads is home to more than 1.7 transportation planning, adopted the 2040 million residents and is projected to grow Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) – a to just over two million by the year 2040. Plan which examines these challenges and It is among the 40 largest Metropolitan identifies strategies for advancing long-term Statistical Areas in the country, the seventh transportation investments that will help largest in the Southeast. Over the next 20 achieve the regional vision for a well-balanced years, the Hampton Roads region will face transportation system that promotes good many transportation challenges, including quality of life while enhancing the unique enhancing mobility and accessibility for all character of Hampton Roads. users, increasing reliability across modes, improving safety, minimizing negative impacts to the environment, and identifying funding to maintain and improve the transportation system. On July 21, 2016, the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO), the regional agency responsible for Richmond VIRGINIA Hampton Roads The HRTPO is the agency responsible for regional transportation planning in Hampton Roads. 1 WHAT IS AN LRTP? To update the LRTP, HRTPO staff examines how the region may develop over the next 20 years based upon projected population and employment growth. Changes in growth can impact demand on the regional transportation system, therefore future plans must consider alternatives to effectively address these needs. Once alternatives are determined, funds are identified to pay for new or widened facilities. This entire process requires regional cooperation and public participation. UPDATING THE LRTP Updating the LRTP to the horizon year of 2040 occurred over several years, with critical input The LRTP is a from regional, state, and federal stakeholders, comprehensive as well as the public. The development of the and multimodal 2040 LRTP is documented in a compendium of reports that outline the following: transportation blueprint that identifies and plans • Visioning process to help define the plan’s vision and goals for critically important • Socioeconomic forecast for projected transportation population and employment growth improvements that • Collection of candidate transportation impact the region’s projects economic vitality and • Evaluation and prioritization of candidate every citizen’s quality projects of life. The LRTP has • Regional transportation challenges and associated strategies to meet these a planning horizon challenges of 20 years and is • Assessment of candidate projects from updated every five years a Title VI and Environmental Justice to reflect changing perspective conditions such as new • Documentation of the funding plan planning priorities, • A project information guide population projections, • Summary of forecasted plan performance economic changes, • Documentation of public outreach efforts and anticipated travel In addition to these reports documenting the development of the 2040 LRTP for the demand. metropolitan area of Hampton Roads, HRTPO staff also produced a Rural Long-Range Transportation Plan for the rural localities of the City of Franklin and Southampton County. 2 2040 LRTP DEVELOPMENT PLANNING MILESTONES 2040 LRTP COMPENDIUM OF REPORTS 3 2040 LRTP VISION STATEMENT “With an engaged public, the 2040 Long- Range Transportation Plan sets forth a vision to develop a well-balanced transportation system that promotes good quality of life while enhancing the unique character of Hampton Roads.” Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization #RegionalPriorities Utilizing a Vision Survey, regional priorities were solicited from stakeholders and interested citizens across Hampton Roads. These priorities were then used to help define the vision and goals that would help guide the development of the 2040 LRTP. Like Comment Share Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Key Findings of Vision Survey Key findings from the 2040 LRTP Vision Survey. Like Comment Share 5 TRANSPORTATION FACTS CURRENT STATE OF TRANSPORTATION IN THE REGION The total amount of roadway usage in Hampton Roads, The Hampton Roads transportation network measured in terms of vehicle-miles of travel (VMT), is comprised of an intricate system of roads, was nearly bridges, tunnels, bikeways, railroads, and 40 million miles waterways. These facilities are traveled by each day in 2015. The amount of roadway travel in buses, trucks, ferries, trains, pedestrians, Hampton Roads has decreased over the last decade - cyclists, and hundreds of thousands of between 2006 and 2015, there was a drivers in personal vehicles each day. There are a multitude of challenges related 1%1% declinedecline to efficiently moving 1.7 million residents in vehicular travel. and thousands of visitors each day on the existing transportation infrastructure, CHANGE IN VEHICLE-MILES OF TRAVEL IN HAMPTON ROADS, particularly due to the geographic features VIRGINIA, AND THE UNITED STATES, 2006 AND 2015 that make Hampton Roads a unique place. With the creation of a regional transportation 4.4% funding mechanism – the Hampton Roads 1.9% Transportation Fund (HRTF) – for the 1.0% construction of major roadway and bridge projects, and the implementation of a HAMPTON ROADS VIRGINIA UNITED STATES statewide prioritization process for funding projects through construction (SMART SCALE), there are many regionally significant The average vehicle trip in Hampton projects being built across the Hampton Roads takes Roads region. Improvements are also being 19% longer made at the region’s airports, multi-modal stations, active transportation facilities, and during the peak travel period as compared to uncongested conditions. marine terminals. Planning also continues on fixed-guideway transit extension projects in several localities. However, even with these ongoing and planned projects, the The average amount of time stuck in region still faces transportation challenges. congestion annually by peak period Despite the creation of HRTF, there is still a commuters traveling by automobile funding shortage for many transportation in Hampton Roads is projects; maintenance needs continue to 4545 hourshours increase as transportation infrastructure, and in particular the
Recommended publications
  • Hampton Roads 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan: List of Projects

    Hampton Roads 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan: List of Projects

    Hampton Roads g-Range Transportation Plan: 2040 Lon Approved and Adopted July 21, 2016 List of ProjectsUpdated July 29, 2020 R PRIORITY PROJECTS EGIONAL The following section contains the HRTPO Board Approved project sequencing of the Regional Priority Projects based on project readiness for inclusion in the 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan. Planned funding sources for these projects include: the Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF), HRTAC/HRTF Bonds, HRTAC Toll Revenues, and SMART SCALE (formerly House Bill 2) High-Priority Projects Program forecasted revenues between 2016-2040. 1 Sequencing Based on Project Readiness • I-64 Peninsula Widening I • I-64/I-264 Interchange II • I-64 Southside Widening/High-Rise Bridge - Phase 1 III • I-64/Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel Widening • I-64 Southside Widening/High-Rise Bridge - Phase 2 IV • Bowers Hill Interchange • I-64/Fort Eustis Blvd Interchange V • US Route 460/58/13 Connector Approved by the HRTPO Board at its February 18, 2016 Meeting. 2 Estimated Estimated Group Project YOE* Cost Opening Year I-64 Peninsula Widening Segment 1 $123 Million 2017 Segment 2 $190 Million 2019 Segment 3 $311 Million 2022 I I-64/I-264 (including Witchduck Rd Interchange) Phase 1 $157 Million 2019 Phase 2 $190 Million 2021 Phase 3 Study $10 Million 2018 I-64 Southside Widening (including High Rise Bridge) II Phase 1 $600 Million 2021 Hampton Roads Crossing $3 Million Regional Connectors Study 2020 III ($4 Million Contingency) I-64/Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Widening $3.8 Billion 2025 I-64 Southside Widening
  • Upper Cenozoic Deposits of the Central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware

    Upper Cenozoic Deposits of the Central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware

    Upper Ceoozoic Deposits GEOLOGICAL SXJEVilY FRQfEBSIONAL lAPEE Upper Cenozoic Deposits of the Central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware By JAMES P. OWENS and CHARLES S. DENNY SURFACE AND SHALLOW SUBSURFACE GEOLOGIC STUDIES IN THE EMERGED COASTAL PLAIN OF THE MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1067-A Upper Tertiary deltaic and shallow-water marine deposits form the backbone of the peninsula. The oldest marine deposits of Pleistocene age reach a maximum altitude of 15 meters (50 feet) and have been dated radiometrically at about 100,000 years UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Owens, James Patrick, 1924- Upper Cenozoic deposits of the central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware. (Surface and shallow subsurface geologic studies in the emerged coastal plain of the Middle Atlantic States) (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1067-A) Bibliography: p. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1067-A 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cenozoic. 2. Geology Delmarva Peninsula. I. Denny, Charles Storrow, 1911- joint author. II. Title. III. Series. IV. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1067-A. QE690.093 551.7'8 77-608325 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03191-4 CONTENTS Abstract._____________________________________________________________
  • 2012-AG-Environmental-Audit.Pdf

    2012-AG-Environmental-Audit.Pdf

    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER ONE: YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER AND DEEP CREEK LAKE .................. 4 I. Background .......................................................................................................... 4 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ........................................................... 9 III. The Youghiogheny River/Deep Creek Lake Audit, May 16, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned............................................................................................. 12 CHAPTER TWO: COASTAL BAYS ............................................................................. 15 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 15 II. Active Enforcement Efforts and Pending Matters ............................................. 17 III. The Coastal Bays Audit, July 12, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned .. 20 CHAPTER THREE: WYE RIVER ................................................................................. 24 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 24 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ......................................................... 26 III. The Wye River Audit, October 10, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned 27 CHAPTER FOUR: POTOMAC RIVER NORTH BRANCH AND SAVAGE RIVER 31 I. Background .......................................................................................................
  • Shoreline Management in Chesapeake Bay C

    Shoreline Management in Chesapeake Bay C

    Shoreline Management In Chesapeake Bay C. S. Hardaway, Jr. and R. J. Byrne Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William and Mary 1 Cover Photo: Drummond Field, Installed 1985, James River, James City County, Virginia. This publication is available for $10.00 from: Sea Grant Communications Virginia Institute of Marine Science P. O. Box 1346 Gloucester Point, VA 23062 Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 356 Virginia Sea Grant Publication VSG-99-11 October 1999 Funding and support for this report were provided by... Virginia Institute of Marine Science Virginia Sea Grant College Program Sea Grant Contract # NA56RG0141 Virginia Coastal Resource Management Program NA470Z0287 WILLIAM& MARY Shoreline Management In Chesapeake Bay By C. Scott Hardaway, Jr. and Robert J. Byrne Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1999 4 Table of Contents Preface......................................................................................7 Shoreline Evolution ................................................................8 Shoreline Processes ..............................................................16 Wave Climate .......................................................................16 Shoreline Erosion .................................................................20 Reach Assessment ................................................................23 Shoreline Management Strategies ......................................24 Bulkheads and Seawalls
  • Vtrans2035 Final Report

    Vtrans2035 Final Report

    Virginia’s Long-Range Multimodal Transportation Plan VTrans2035 Report to the Governor and General Assembly Prepared for: Commonwealth Transportation Board Prepared by: Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment January 2010 PREFACE Section 33.1-23.03 of the Code of Virginia directs the Commonwealth Transportation Board, with the assistance of the Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment, to develop a Statewide Transportation Plan (hereafter, VTrans2035) setting forth an assessment of capacity needs for all corridors of statewide significance, regional networks, and improvements to promote urban development areas (Appendix A). Secretary of Transportation Pierce R. Homer created an Executive Oversight Committee, consisting of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation and the heads of the Department of Aviation, Department of Transportation, Department of Rail and Public Transportation, Department of Motor Vehicles and the Virginia Port Authority to help guide the development of VTrans2035. Secretary Homer also created a Multimodal Advisory Committee consisting of technical experts and policy makers to provide the technical expertise required to develop VTrans2035. The following agencies and organizations were represented on this committee: • Federal Highway Administration • Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment • Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions • Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization • Richmond Regional Planning District Commission • Northern Virginia Transportation Authority • Department of Aviation • Department of Transportation • Department of Rail and Public Transportation • Department of Motor Vehicles • Virginia Port Authority VTrans2035 was also developed with the assistance of numerous private firms specializing in the development of long-range plans: • Cambridge Systematics • Economic Development Research Group • Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. • Jack Faucett Associates • KFH Group • Michael Baker, Jr.
  • Meeting of the Operations and Oversight Committee Thursday, September 12, 2019 • 10:00 A.M

    Meeting of the Operations and Oversight Committee Thursday, September 12, 2019 • 10:00 A.M

    Meeting of the Operations and Oversight Committee Thursday, September 12, 2019 • 10:00 a.m. 2nd Floor Boardroom, 3400 Victoria Blvd., Hampton, VA _____________________________________________________________ A meeting of the Operations and Oversight Committee is scheduled for Thursday, September 12, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the 2nd Floor Boardroom, 3400 Victoria Blvd., Hampton, VA The agenda and supporting materials are included in this package for your review. Meeting of the Operations and Oversight Committee Thursday, September 12, 2019 • 10:00 a.m. 2nd Floor Boardroom, 3400 Victoria Blvd., Hampton, VA AGENDA 1. Approval of the August 2019 Operations and Oversight Committee Meeting Minutes 2. Review Action Items 3. Audit Update 4. Procurement Recommendations to the Committee: a. Contract 19-00030, Fence and Railing Maintenance and Repair Services b. Contract 18-78382R, Healthcare Reporting Services c. Purchase Order 81512, Light Rail Vehicle Guiding Rods and Overhauled Traction Link Assembly Kits d. Purchase Order 81583, Light Rail Overhead Catenary System e. Contract 19-00006R, Medical Surveillance Program Management Services (renewal) f. Contract 19-00023, Provision of Bulk Fluids g. Contract 19-00043, Purchase of Six (6) 40’ Electric Buses h. Contract 19-00018, Towing and Flat Tire Replacement Services (renewal) 5. Options to be Exercised December 2019 6. Upcoming Commission Approvals 7. Operations Update 8. Old and New Business 9. Adjournment The next Operations & Oversight Committee Meeting will be held on Thursday, October 10, 2019 Meeting of the Operations and Oversight Committee Thursday, August 8, 2019 • 10:00 a.m. 2nd Floor Board Room • 509 E. 18th Street, Norfolk, VA MEETING MINUTES Call to order Commissioner Rowe called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
  • Report on the Early History of the Alexandria, Virginia Sewerage System

    Report on the Early History of the Alexandria, Virginia Sewerage System

    Report on the Early History of the Alexandria, Virginia Sewerage System Jason Tercha January 16, 2017 In 1952, the Alexandria City Council created the first sanitation authority in Virginia. Four years later, the City of Alexandria Sewer Authority opened a water-treatment facility near the mouth of Hooff’s Run. Since 1956, the water treatment facility has treated the city’s sewerage discharge, purifying the sanitary water of the city and discharging clean water back into the environment. In response to more stringent environmental standards and renewed efforts to restore the health of the Chesapeake Bay, the Alexandria Sewer Authority upgraded the facility during the late 1990s and through the 2000s. Now known as Alexandria Renew Enterprises after a 2012 rebrand, the sewerage facility remains a crucial component of the city of Alexandria’s efforts to maintain the health and prosperity of its citizens and environment. This brief overview of the city of Alexandria’s twentieth and twenty-first century efforts to manage and treat its sewerage is well documented in city records, newspapers, and the annual reports of the Alexandria Sewer Authority.1 However, as much as these recent efforts to manage waste- and stormwater are known, the city’s earlier struggles to accomplish these goals have largely remained a mystery. The obscurity of Alexandria’s early sewerage control efforts might mistakenly suggest a dearth of water management efforts in the nineteenth century. As this report demonstrates, since the city’s founding Alexandrians exerted immense efforts to manage the excess stormwater and to dispose of the human and animal wastes by incorporating new technologies and practices to respond to evolving knowledge of human health and the environment of a growing regional entrepôt.
  • Economic Vitality and Quality of Life Unlocking Hampton Roads

    Economic Vitality and Quality of Life Unlocking Hampton Roads

    HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION Economic Vitality and Quality of Life Unlocking Hampton Roads HRTAC Overview Kevin B. Page 1/10/2020 Executive Director CONGESTION/FUTURE CONNECTIVITY 2040 Population 2040 Employment The Stage is set for Regional Transportation Solution Consensus Building 2 Unlocking Hampton Roads Unlocking Hampton 3 • For two decades the Region has identified these projects MOVING THE REGION FORWARD HRTAC/HRTF Overview • Hampton Roads Transportation Fund created 2013 Acts of Assembly HB2313 • HRTAC created 2014 Acts of Assembly HB1253 – Hired Executive Director August 2015 • Empowered to procure, finance, build and operate highway, bridge, tunnel, rail and transit projects in Hampton Roads • Authorized to use HRTF monies (and tolls for new construction projects on new or existing highways, bridges and tunnels and to issue bonds using revenues to support Roads Unlocking Hampton bond debt • Regional Collaboration - Works closely with the Hampton 4 Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) who determines Project Prioritization for the region HRTAC Membership 19 Voting members 10 Cities 4 Counties Chesapeake Isle of Wight Franklin James City Hampton Southampton Newport News York Norfolk Poquoson 5 VA General Assembly Members Portsmouth Two Members of the Senate Suffolk Three Members of the House of Virginia Beach Delegates Williamsburg 4 Non-Voting Ex-officio members Commonwealth Transportation Board Member Virginia Department of Transportation Unlocking Hampton Roads Unlocking Hampton Virginia
  • Shoreline Evolution Chesapeake Bay Shoreline City of Norfolk, Virginia

    Shoreline Evolution Chesapeake Bay Shoreline City of Norfolk, Virginia

    Shoreline Evolution Chesapeake Bay Shoreline City of Norfolk, Virginia Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William & Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia 2005 Shoreline Evolution Chesapeake Bay Shoreline City of Norfolk, VA C. Scott Hardaway, Jr. 1 Donna A. Milligan 1 Lyle M. Varnell 2 Christine Wilcox 1 George R. Thomas 1 Travis R. Comer 1 Shoreline Studies Program 1 Department of Physical Sciences and Wetlands Program 2 Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William & Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia 2005 This project was funded by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality’s Coastal Resources Management Program through Grant #NA17OZ2355 of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its subagencies or DEQ. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the City of Norfolk within the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system...................2 Figure 2. Location of localities in the Dune Act with jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional localities noted. ...2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 3. Geological map of the City of Norfolk (from Mixon et al., 1989). ...........................3 Figure 4. Index of shoreline plates.............................................................4 TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................. i Figure 5. Variability of dune and beach profiles within the City of Norfolk ............................7 Figure 6. Typical profile of a Chesapeake Bay dune system. ........................................7 LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................... i Figure 7. Photo of the Norfolk shoreline showing dune site NF3.. ...................................9 Figure 8.
  • Garrett County

    Garrett County

    Appendix D- Recreation Inventory County Acres Private/ quasi-public State/Federal Acres Courts Fields Trails (Miles) Campsites Basketball Basketball Baseball Multi Swimming XC Golf Public Beach Public Boat Site Recreation Resource Recreation Resource Recreation Resource Classification Ownership Comments/Amenities Indoor Outdoor Tennis Other Gymnasium Softball Soccer Purpose Pools Skiing Hiking Biking ORV Snowmobile Total Public Pvt Courses (ft.) Launch Areas Accident Community Park East 4.1 Neighborhood Park Town of Accident Ball field, walking trail, horseshoe pits 1 1 1 0.25 0.25 Accident Community Park West 12.5 Neighborhood Park Town of Accident Pavilions, volleyball Accident Elementary School 9.6 School Recreation Park Board of Education Basketball court, playground 1 1 1 1 Accident Community Pond 2.4 Community Park Town of Accident Fishing pond Aquatic Center 1.0 Marine Private Private marina 1 ASCI -Adventure Sports Center Int'l. 17.0 Special Use Area ASCI Man-made whitewater course Avilton Community Center 2.0 Special Use Area Avilton Community Assoc. Playground, basketball court, pavilion 1 Bear Creek Hatchery Fish Mgmt. Area 113.0 Natural Resource Area State of MD Fish management area Big Run State Park 300.0 State Park State of MD Camping, fishing, Savage River Reservoir access 29 1 Bill's Outdoor Center 1.0 Marine Private Lake access, shoreline Bills Marine Service, Inc. 1.0 Marine Private Marina, boat rentals 1 Bloomington Fire Co. Town Park 3.0 Community Park Bloomington Fire Co. Basketball court, walking trail, pavilion
  • The Recreation the Delmarva Peninsula by David

    The Recreation the Delmarva Peninsula by David

    THE RECREATION POTENTIAL OF THE DELMARVA PENINSULA BY DAVID LEE RUBIN S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1965) SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOT THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN CITY PLANNING at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June, 1966 Signature of Author.,.-.-,.*....... .. .*.0 .. .. ...... .. ...... ... Department of City and Regional Planning May 23, 1966 Certified by.... ....... .- -*s.e- Super....... Thesis Supervisor Accepted by... ... ...tire r'*n.-..0 *10iy.- .. 0....................0 Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students 038 The Recreation Potential of the Delmarva Peninsula By David Lee Rubin Submitted to the Department of City and Regional Planning on 23 May, 1966 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning. rhis thesis is a plan for the development of Lne recreation potential of the Delmarva Peninsyla, the lower counties of Delaware and the Eastern Shore of Maryland and Virginia, to meet the needs of the Megalopolitan population. Before 1952, the Delmarva Peninsula was isolated, and no development of any kind occurred. The population was stable, with no in migration, and the attitudes were rural. The economy was sagging. Then a bridge was built across the Chesapeake Bay, and the peninsula became a recreation resource for the Baltimore and Washington areas. Ocean City and Rehoboth, the major resorts, have grown rapidly since then. In 1964, the opening of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel further accellerated growth. There are presently plans for the development of a National Seashore on Assateague Island, home of the Chincoteague ponies, as well as state parks along the Chesapeake Bay, and such facilities as a causeway through the ocean and a residential complex in the Indian River Bay.
  • Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

    Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

    Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 3.15 INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 3.15.1 Regulatory Context and Methodology NEPA legislation does not mention indirect or cumulative impacts; however, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing NEPA address federal agency responsibilities applicable to indirect and cumulative considerations, analysis, and documentation requirements (40 CFR 1508.25) for the environmental consequences section of an EIS (40 CFR 1502.16) (FHWA, 2014). In addition to CEQ’s regulations, indirect and cumulative effects assessment is conducted in accordance with the requirements and processes outlined in 23 CFR Part 771, FHWA Interim Guidance: Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in NEPA (2003), FHWA Position Paper on Secondary and Cumulative Impact Assessment (1992), FHWA’s Questions and Answers on Considering Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in the NEPA Process (2015), the Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 466: Desk Reference for Estimating the Indirect Effect of Proposed Transportation Projects (TRB, 2002), NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 22: Land Use Forecasting for Indirect Impacts Analysis (TRB, 2005), NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 11: Secondary/Indirect and Cumulative Effects Analysis (TRB, 2006), as well as CEQ’s Considering Cumulative Effects under the National Environmental Policy Act (1997) and Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in Cumulative Effects Analysis (2005). CEQ defines indirect effects as “…effects which are caused by the action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable (40 CFR 1508.8[b]). Indirect effects may include growth-inducing effects and other effects related to induced changes in the pattern of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air and water and other natural systems, including ecosystems” (40 CFR 1508.8[b]).