DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 CMMPO Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 CMMPO Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan 2011 CEN TRAL MASSACHUSETTS REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PED ESTRIAN PLANA 2 Washington Square – Union Station Worcester, MA 01604 www.cmrpc.org Table of Contents Introduction . 3 Chapter 1 – Policy Framework . 5 Chapter 2 – Benefits of and Impediments to Bicycling and Walking . 13 Chapter 3 – Current Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Network . 17 A. On-Road Accommodations . 17 B. Long Distance Bikeways/Trails/Shared-Use Paths . 22 C. Connections with Transit . 38 Chapter 4 – Community Initiatives . 41 Chapter 5 – Regional Strategies and Recommendations . 45 A. Strategies and Recommendations. 45 B. Policies and Programs . 48 C. Regional Multi-Community Projects . 51 Chapter 6 – Funding . 53 1 This page intentionally left blank. 2 Introduction Since the passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991, federal, state, regional and many local governments have realized the potential that pedestrian and bicycle improvements have for relieving traffic congestion, promoting economic development and improving air quality. Since then, federal funding for pedestrian and bicycle projects has increased substantially and has continued with the passage of ISTEA’s successor bills: the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) in 1998 and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA- LU) in 2005. Over the last five years, Massachusetts has made significant efforts to improve the visibility and inclusion of pedestrian and bicycling planning and infrastructure in transportation improvement projects. In 2006, the Massachusetts Highway Department (now part of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation [MassDOT]) developed its Project Development and Design Guidebook. This Guidebook replaced the previous Highway Design Manual and placed a greater emphasis on context-sensitive design for Massachusetts roadways and identified pedestrians and bicyclists as equal users of roadways as vehicles. Similarly, the Executive Office of Transportation (also now part of MassDOT) released the updated Massachusetts Bicycle Transportation Plan in October 2008 which provided a newly prioritized statewide vision for on- and off-road bicycling improvements. MassDOT is currently in the process of developing an updated Massachusetts Pedestrian Transportation Plan to coincide with the Massachusetts Bicycle Transportation Plan. In addition to statewide efforts, the Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization (CMMPO) has recognized the importance of pedestrian and bicycle planning. In 2007, the CMMPO developed its Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) which envisions transportation infrastructure improvements extending out to the year 2030. Within the RTP, the CMMPO identified existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, as well as a vision for how pedestrian and bicycle improvements would help relieve traffic congestion and improve air quality within the CMMPO region. Similarly, momentum for improved pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure has increased, both statewide and regionally. In an effort to maintain that momentum, this Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is envisioned to be a “living” document that continues to develop under a dynamic planning process. This plan gives a regional perspective of walking and bicycling activities along with their associated facilities within the region. The goal of the plan is to: (1) inventory existing facilities; (2) identify physical and other impediments to walking and bicycling in the region; and (3) develop strategies to increase the use of walking and bicycling modes as transportation options in the region. Further, the plan provides a clearer understanding of the value of walking and bicycling in the transportation planning process and how the provision of facilities and infrastructure for these modes is important in helping to create healthy and livable communities. It is the intent of the CMMPO to evaluate its past and present efforts and offer direction and recommendations for the future development or improvement of pedestrian and bicycle facilities within individual communities and the region as a whole. 3 This page intentionally left blank. 4 Chapter 1 – Policy Framework 2007 CMMPO Reegional Transportation Plan The 2007 Regional Transportation Plan of the CMMPO is guided in part by the following two goals and objectives that address siix of the eight “areas of concern” under SAFETEA-LU (economic vitality, accessibility/mobility, environmental/quality of life, energy conservation, integration and connectivity of modes, efficient system management). They demonstrate the MPO’s strong suppport for bicycling and pedestrian modes: Promote livable communities and improved air quality through context sensitive design and reduced traffic congestion o Improve and encourage the use of public transit, riddesharing services, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities so as to achieve a reduction in the percentage of commuter trips utilizing single-occupant vehicles (SOVs), as measured in the 2000 U.S. Census Journey-to-Work data. Develop an alternative, creative transportation system that integrates multiple traavel modes and includes the use of technology o Monitor the connectivity of the physical regional infrastructure within and across the regional planning boundary so that it can be better incorporated in the prioritization and selection of transpportation improvement projects. In keeping with changes in federal and state transportation policy to accommodate more bicycling and walking projects and facilities in urban and suburban areas, the Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission (CMRPC) Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee has been created. The Advisory Committee is composed of various stakeholders in the region such as local citizens, health advocates, MassDOT representatives, environmental/ conservation groups, and local DPW staff. The Advisory Committee’s mission is to assist in the development of goals and strategies for regional policy and to advise the CMMPO where to prioritize construction or improvement of bicycle and peedestrian facilities in the region. Massachusetts Staatewide Bicycle Plan The comprehensive Massachusetts State Bicycle Plan was updated in 2008 by the Executive Office of Transportation (noww MassDOT) with input from the Massachusetts Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Board (MABPAB). This Plan reflects what was identified in the State’s 2006 Long-Range Transportation Plan regarding pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as well as the design and procedures laid out in the Project Development and Design Guidebook. The intent of the Plan is to promote multi-modality, economic vitality, and environmental preservation. 5 The Plan continues to advance bicycle transportation in Massachusetts by: Providing a complete and current inventory of available and eexisting on‐road and off‐road facilities (shared use paths), projects in the pipeliine, and long‐term facility proposals Recommending a 740‐mile, seven‐corridor Bay State Greenway (BSG) network consisting of on‐road and off‐road facilities bounnd by a single identity and including on‐ road routes that parallel shared use paths Providing an implementation strategy aimed at launching the BSG initially as mostly an on‐road system, geared to both utilitarian and reccreational travel, and complemented by a long‐term investment strategy Recommending other programmatic enhancements and interagency initiatives Other recommendations in the Plan include: Better identification of state roads and bridges where bicycles are legally permitted but not accommodated today Use of federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) funds and other sources to expand ancillary bicycle programs such as “Share the Road” signs, bicycle parking facilities, and regional and local bicycle planning Development of bicycle tourist publications through the Massachusetts Office of Travel and Tourism (MOTT) Improving safety through education and enforcement initiatives and facility performance measurement Further quantification of the benefits of investments in projects and programs that improve bicycling conditions The establishment of the BSG is motivated by a number of factors, including the Commonwealth’s inherently bicycle‐friendly nature, the need for more bicycle routes and more coordinated information on them, projected economic benefits, and the ability to implement the BSG incrementally. Within the CMMPO region, the Blackstone River Greenway and the Mass Central Rail Trail are two multi-community bicycle corridor projects that are envisioned to be incorporated into the statewide BSG system. Massachusetts Staatewide Pedestrian Plan The comprehensive Massachusetts Pedestrian Transportation Plan, created in 1998, is the current plan for the Commonwealth. An updated statewide pedestrian pplan is currently being developed byy MassDOT with input from the MABPAB and is expected to be completed in 2011. The 1998 Plan included recommendations aimed at developing a more pedestrian-focused statewide transportation system through govvernment and private sector actions. The intended result is a safe, convenient, continuous, coherent and comfortable walking network. Strategies include physical improvements appropriate to thhe setting, local and statewide 6 encouragement and education programs, increased adherence to laws, and improvements in the process that sets policy and plan facilities. Massachusetts is already a walking state. Approximately 10.4 percent of all Massachusetts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outdoor Recreation Recreation Outdoor Massachusetts the Wildlife
    Photos by MassWildlife by Photos Photo © Kindra Clineff massvacation.com mass.gov/massgrown Office of Fishing & Boating Access * = Access to coastal waters A = General Access: Boats and trailer parking B = Fisherman Access: Smaller boats and trailers C = Cartop Access: Small boats, canoes, kayaks D = River Access: Canoes and kayaks Other Massachusetts Outdoor Information Outdoor Massachusetts Other E = Sportfishing Pier: Barrier free fishing area F = Shorefishing Area: Onshore fishing access mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/fba/ Western Massachusetts boundaries and access points. mass.gov/dfw/pond-maps points. access and boundaries BOAT ACCESS SITE TOWN SITE ACCESS then head outdoors with your friends and family! and friends your with outdoors head then publicly accessible ponds providing approximate depths, depths, approximate providing ponds accessible publicly ID# TYPE Conservation & Recreation websites. Make a plan and and plan a Make websites. Recreation & Conservation Ashmere Lake Hinsdale 202 B Pond Maps – Suitable for printing, this is a list of maps to to maps of list a is this printing, for Suitable – Maps Pond Benedict Pond Monterey 15 B Department of Fish & Game and the Department of of Department the and Game & Fish of Department Big Pond Otis 125 B properties and recreational activities, visit the the visit activities, recreational and properties customize and print maps. mass.gov/dfw/wildlife-lands maps. print and customize Center Pond Becket 147 C For interactive maps and information on other other on information and maps interactive For Cheshire Lake Cheshire 210 B displays all MassWildlife properties and allows you to to you allows and properties MassWildlife all displays Cheshire Lake-Farnams Causeway Cheshire 273 F Wildlife Lands Maps – The MassWildlife Lands Viewer Viewer Lands MassWildlife The – Maps Lands Wildlife Cranberry Pond West Stockbridge 233 C Commonwealth’s properties and recreation activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Cochituate Rail Trail Project Early Environmental Coordination
    Town of Natick Massachusetts Cochituate Rail Trail Project Early Environmental Coordination May 2014 Cochituate Rail Trail Project May 2014 Natick, Massachusetts TABLE OF CONTENTS 25% EARLY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST CORRESPONDENCE CE CHECKLIST WATER QUALITY DATA FORMS DRAFT NOI FIGURES Figure 1 – Locus Map Figure 2 – Soil Map Figure 3 – Flood Map Figure 4 – NHESP Priority Habitats of Rare Species Figure 5 – Underground Storage Tanks Map SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PHOTOS OF FIELD CONDITIONS AND FEATURES i Cochituate Rail Trail Project May 2014 Natick, Massachusetts 25% Early Environmental Checklist 25% Design Submission Checklist Early Environmental Coordination for Design Projects Effective 1/01/2011 The Designer shall complete and submit this form electronically with backup information and explanations of how each item has been addressed or documented. Completion of this checklist and its requirements is necessary for the project to obtain approval from Environmental Services to proceed with a 25% Design Public Hearing. Note: In an attempt to reduce paper consumption, Environmental Services requests that only one (1) paper copy of the 25% Design is submitted for Environmental review. All Early Environmental Coordination documentation should be submitted only in an electronic format (.pdf, .doc, .xls, etc) wherever possible. Documentation should be submitted to the MassDOT project manager for routing to Environmental Services. PUBLIC COORDINATION Instructions Addressed? Coordinate with local boards, commissions & officials to identify specific issues or concerns regarding the project purpose and need and general scope of 1 Click Here Y work. Attach all written correspondence. If the proponent has presented the project in a public meeting setting, provide information regarding the meeting including the name of the public 2 Y* board/commission, the date and location, public comments and any formal meeting minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 4 OF 8 MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 250176 ARLINGTON, TOWN OF 250177 Middlesex County ASHBY, TOWN OF 250178 ASHLAND, TOWN OF 250179 AYER, TOWN OF 250180 BEDFORD, TOWN OF 255209 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BELMONT, TOWN OF 250182 MELROSE, CITY OF 250206 BILLERICA, TOWN OF 250183 NATICK, TOWN OF 250207 BOXBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250184 NEWTON, CITY OF 250208 BURLINGTON, TOWN OF 250185 NORTH READING, TOWN OF 250209 CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF 250186 PEPPERELL, TOWN OF 250210 CARLISLE, TOWN OF 250187 READING, TOWN OF 250211 CHELMSFORD, TOWN OF 250188 SHERBORN, TOWN OF 250212 CONCORD, TOWN OF 250189 SHIRLEY, TOWN OF 250213 DRACUT, TOWN OF 250190 SOMERVILLE, CITY OF 250214 DUNSTABLE, TOWN OF 250191 STONEHAM, TOWN OF 250215 EVERETT, CITY OF 250192 STOW, TOWN OF 250216 FRAMINGHAM, TOWN OF 250193 SUDBURY, TOWN OF 250217 GROTON, TOWN OF 250194 TEWKSBURY, TOWN OF 250218 HOLLISTON, TOWN OF 250195 TOWNSEND, TOWN OF 250219 HOPKINTON, TOWN OF 250196 TYNGSBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250220 HUDSON, TOWN OF 250197 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 250221 LEXINGTON, TOWN OF 250198 WALTHAM, CITY OF 250222 LINCOLN, TOWN OF 250199 WATERTOWN, TOWN OF 250223 LITTLETON, TOWN OF 250200 WAYLAND, TOWN OF 250224 LOWELL, CITY OF 250201 WESTFORD, TOWN OF 250225 MALDEN, CITY OF 250202 WESTON, TOWN OF 250226 MARLBOROUGH, CITY OF 250203 WILMINGTON, TOWN OF 250227 MAYNARD, TOWN OF 250204 WINCHESTER, TOWN OF 250228 MEDFORD, CITY OF 250205 WOBURN, CITY OF 250229 EFFECTIVE: JUNE 4, 2010 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25017CV004A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Ground-Water Flow and Evaluation of Water-Management Alternatives in the Assabet River Basin, Eastern Massachusetts
    Simulation of Ground-Water Flow and Evaluation of Water-Management Alternatives in the Assabet River Basin, Eastern Massachusetts By Leslie A. DeSimone Abstract plus wastewater discharge) out of the Assabet Main Stem Upper, Middle, and Lower subbasins, respectively, in an average September. Water-supply withdrawals and wastewater disposal in the The ground-water-flow models were used to evaluate Assabet River Basin in eastern Massachusetts alter the flow and water-management alternatives by simulating hypothetical water quality in the basin. Wastewater discharges and stream- scenarios of altered withdrawals and discharges. A scenario that flow depletion from ground-water withdrawals adversely affect included no water management quantified nonstorm stream- water quality in the Assabet River, especially during low-flow flows that would result without withdrawals, discharges, septic- months (late summer) and in headwater areas. Streamflow system return flow, or consumptive use. Tributary flows in this depletion also contributes to loss of aquatic habitat in tributaries scenario increased in most subbasins by 2 to 44 percent relative to the river. In 1997–2001, water-supply withdrawals averaged to 1997–2001 conditions. The increases resulted mostly from 9.9 million gallons per day (Mgal/d). Wastewater discharges variable combinations of decreased withdrawals and decreased to the Assabet River averaged 11 Mgal/d and included about infiltration to sewers. Average annual nonstorm streamflow in 5.4 Mgal/d that originated from sources outside of the basin. the Assabet River decreased slightly in this scenario, by 2 to 3 The effects of current (2004) and future withdrawals and percent annually, because gains in ground-water discharge were discharges on water resources in the basin were investigated in offset by the elimination of wastewater discharges.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 1 OF 8 MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 250176 ARLINGTON, TOWN OF 250177 Middlesex County ASHBY, TOWN OF 250178 ASHLAND, TOWN OF 250179 AYER, TOWN OF 250180 BEDFORD, TOWN OF 255209 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BELMONT, TOWN OF 250182 MELROSE, CITY OF 250206 BILLERICA, TOWN OF 250183 NATICK, TOWN OF 250207 BOXBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250184 NEWTON, CITY OF 250208 BURLINGTON, TOWN OF 250185 NORTH READING, TOWN OF 250209 CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF 250186 PEPPERELL, TOWN OF 250210 CARLISLE, TOWN OF 250187 READING, TOWN OF 250211 CHELMSFORD, TOWN OF 250188 SHERBORN, TOWN OF 250212 CONCORD, TOWN OF 250189 SHIRLEY, TOWN OF 250213 DRACUT, TOWN OF 250190 SOMERVILLE, CITY OF 250214 DUNSTABLE, TOWN OF 250191 STONEHAM, TOWN OF 250215 EVERETT, CITY OF 250192 STOW, TOWN OF 250216 FRAMINGHAM, TOWN OF 250193 SUDBURY, TOWN OF 250217 GROTON, TOWN OF 250194 TEWKSBURY, TOWN OF 250218 HOLLISTON, TOWN OF 250195 TOWNSEND, TOWN OF 250219 HOPKINTON, TOWN OF 250196 TYNGSBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250220 HUDSON, TOWN OF 250197 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 250221 LEXINGTON, TOWN OF 250198 WALTHAM, CITY OF 250222 LINCOLN, TOWN OF 250199 WATERTOWN, TOWN OF 250223 LITTLETON, TOWN OF 250200 WAYLAND, TOWN OF 250224 LOWELL, CITY OF 250201 WESTFORD, TOWN OF 250225 MALDEN, CITY OF 250202 WESTON, TOWN OF 250226 MARLBOROUGH, CITY OF 250203 WILMINGTON, TOWN OF 250227 MAYNARD, TOWN OF 250204 WINCHESTER, TOWN OF 250228 MEDFORD, CITY OF 250205 WOBURN, CITY OF 250229 Map Revised: July 7, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25017CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pond and Lake GEIR Appendices
    APPENDIX I WATER QUALITY PROGRAMS AND FUNDING SOURCES NOTE TO READER: Because of ongoing changes in programs and funding sources, the information in this Appendix has been omitted. The most up-to-date information on funding sources can be found at the web site of the Massachusetts Nonpoint Source Management Plan: http://www.state.ma.us/dep/brp/wm/nonpoint.htm and by contacting other agencies and entities or consulting their web sites. Appendix II 2 APPENDIX II TABLE OF CONTENTS LOCAL PERMITS AND REGULATIONS: II.1 SSC- STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE and TITLE 5 (BOH) II.2 Zoning-ZONING REGULATIONS (ZC) II.3 WPA-WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT (ConComm) II.4 RPA-RIVERS PROTECTION ACT (ConComm) STATE PERMITS AND REGULATIONS: DEM II.5 ACEC AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (DEM) II.6 ODS-OFFICE OF DAM SAFETY (DEM) DEP II.7 DRINKING WATER PROTECTION (DEP) II.8 GWDP-GROUND WATER DISCHARGE PERMIT (DEP) II.9 SECP-SEWER EXTENSION OR CONNECTION PERMIT (DEP) II.10 WMA-WATER MANAGEMENT ACT (DEP) II.11 NPDES -NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT (DEP) II.12 SWP-SOLID WASTE PERMIT (DSW) II.13 ORW- OUTSTANDING RESOURCES WATERS (DWM) II.14 LAC-LICENSE TO APPLY CHEMICALS (DWM) II.15 WPP-WETLAND PROTECTION PROGRAM (DWW) II.16 WRP-WETLAND RESTRICTION PROGRAM (DWW) II.17 C.91-WATERWAYS REGULATIONS CHAPTER 91 (DWW) II.18 401- 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION (DWW) DFA II.19 PESTICIDE BUREAU LICENSE (DFA) DFW II.20 DFW-DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE (DFW) II.21 NHESP NATURAL HERITAGE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (DFW) EOEA II.22 CZM-MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT (EOEA) II.23 MEPA -MASSACHUSETTS ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (EOEA) MDC II.24 MDC-METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION (MDC) MHC II.25 MHC-MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION (MHC) FEDERAL PERMITS AND REGULATIONS: II.26 NPDES - NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION PERMIT , U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Effects of Winter Drawdowns on the Ecological Character of Littoral Zones in Massachusetts Lakes
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses March 2020 INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES Jason R. Carmignani University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Carmignani, Jason R., "INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 1816. https://doi.org/10.7275/j5k1-fz29 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1816 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2020 Organismic and Evolutionary Biology © Copyright by Jason R. Carmignani 2020 All Rights Reserved INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Approved as to style and content by: ___________________________________ Allison H. Roy, Chair ___________________________________ Andy J. Danylchuk, Member ___________________________________ Cristina Cox Fernandes, Member ___________________________________ Peter D. Hazelton, Member ___________________________________ Jason T. Stolarksi, Member ___________________________________ Paige S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wachusett Reservoir
    Wachusett Reservoir Aquatic Invasive Species Summary Historical Update and Ongoing Actions Spring 2016 Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Water Supply Protection Office of Watershed Management Wachusett Reservoir Aquatic Invasive Species Summary Historical Update and Ongoing Actions Spring 2016 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. History of AIS in Wachusett Reservoir / Watershed....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Reservoir Non‐Native Aquatic Vegetation (through 2015) ............................................................. 2 1.2 Reservoir Non‐Native Aquatic Fauna ........................................................................................................ 5 2. New Introductions and Expansion of Non‐native Species ............................................................................ 6 3. Addressing AIS in the Future: Objectives, Strategies, Actions .................................................................... 7 3.1 Public Education/Outreach ........................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Exclusion and Decontamination .................................................................................................................. 8 3.3 Detection/Monitoring .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Consumption Advisory List Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health (617) 624-5757
    Freshwater Fish Consumption Advisory List Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health (617) 624-5757 WATER BODY TOWN(s) FISH ADVISORY* HAZARD* Aaron River Reservoir Cohasset, Hingham, Scituate P1 (all species), P2 (CP, YP), P4 Mercury Alewife Brook Arlington, Belmont, P1 (C), P3 (C) PCBs Cambridge,Somerville Ames Pond Tewksbury P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Ashland Reservoir Ashland P1 (all species), P5 Mercury Ashley Lake Washington P1 (YP), P3 (YP) Mercury Ashfield Pond Ashfield P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Ashumet Pond Mashpee, Falmouth P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Atkins Reservoir Amherst, Shutesbury P1 (all species), P5 Mercury Attitash, Lake Amesbury, Merrimac P1 (all species), P2 (LMB), P4 Mercury Badluck Lake Douglas P6 Mercury Baker Pond Brewster, Orleans P1 (YP), P3 (YP) Mercury Baldpate Pond Boxford P1 (all species), P2 (LMB), P4 Mercury Ballardvale Impoundment of Shawsheen River Andover P1 (LMB & BC), P3 (LMB & BC) Mercury Bare Hill Pond Harvard P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Bearse Pond Barnstable P1 (LMB, SMB), P3 (LMB, SMB) Mercury Beaver Pond Bellingham, Milford P1 (CP, LMB), P3 (CP, LMB) Mercury Big Pond Otis P1 (all species), P2 (LMB), P4 Mercury Boon, Lake Hudson, Stow P1 (LMB & BC), P3 (LMB & BC) Mercury Box Pond Bellingham, Mendon P1 (WS), P2 (WS) DDT Bracket Reservoir (Framingham Reservoir #2) – See Sudbury River Browning Pond Oakham, Spencer P1 (LMB, YP), P3 (LMB, YP) Mercury Buckley Dunton Lake Becket P1 (LMB), P3 (LMB) Mercury Buffomville Lake Charlton, Oxford P1 (all species), P5 Mercury Burr’s
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Hudson Master Plan November 2014
    Town of Hudson Master Plan November 2014 Prepared by: VHB Hudson Master Plan Hudson Massachusetts Prepared for Town of Hudson Hudson, Massachusetts Prepared by Watertown, Massachusetts November 2014 Table of Contents 1 Introduction, Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 1-1 Introduction and Vision Statement .......................................................................................... 1-1 Community Engagement ........................................................................................................ 1-2 Housing and Economic Development Forum ......................................................... 1-3 Open Space, Recreation, and Historical Resources Forum ................................... 1-4 Energy and Transportation Forum .......................................................................... 1-4 Social Services and Public Health Forum ............................................................... 1-5 Community Services and Facilities Forum .............................................................. 1-6 Land Use and Community Design Goals ................................................................ 1-7 Housing Goals ........................................................................................................ 1-8 Economic Development Goals ................................................................................ 1-8 Natural, Historic and Cultural Resources Goals ..................................................... 1-9
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 1 OF 8 MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 250176 ARLINGTON, TOWN OF 250177 Middlesex County ASHBY, TOWN OF 250178 ASHLAND, TOWN OF 250179 AYER, TOWN OF 250180 BEDFORD, TOWN OF 255209 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BELMONT, TOWN OF 250182 MELROSE, CITY OF 250206 BILLERICA, TOWN OF 250183 NATICK, TOWN OF 250207 BOXBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250184 NEWTON, CITY OF 250208 BURLINGTON, TOWN OF 250185 NORTH READING, TOWN OF 250209 CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF 250186 PEPPERELL, TOWN OF 250210 CARLISLE, TOWN OF 250187 READING, TOWN OF 250211 CHELMSFORD, TOWN OF 250188 SHERBORN, TOWN OF 250212 CONCORD, TOWN OF 250189 SHIRLEY, TOWN OF 250213 DRACUT, TOWN OF 250190 SOMERVILLE, CITY OF 250214 DUNSTABLE, TOWN OF 250191 STONEHAM, TOWN OF 250215 EVERETT, CITY OF 250192 STOW, TOWN OF 250216 FRAMINGHAM, TOWN OF 250193 SUDBURY, TOWN OF 250217 GROTON, TOWN OF 250194 TEWKSBURY, TOWN OF 250218 HOLLISTON, TOWN OF 250195 TOWNSEND, TOWN OF 250219 HOPKINTON, TOWN OF 250196 TYNGSBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250220 HUDSON, TOWN OF 250197 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 250221 LEXINGTON, TOWN OF 250198 WALTHAM, CITY OF 250222 LINCOLN, TOWN OF 250199 WATERTOWN, TOWN OF 250223 LITTLETON, TOWN OF 250200 WAYLAND, TOWN OF 250224 LOWELL, CITY OF 250201 WESTFORD, TOWN OF 250225 MALDEN, CITY OF 250202 WESTON, TOWN OF 250226 MARLBOROUGH, CITY OF 250203 WILMINGTON, TOWN OF 250227 MAYNARD, TOWN OF 250204 WINCHESTER, TOWN OF 250228 MEDFORD, CITY OF 250205 WOBURN, CITY OF 250229 EFFECTIVE: JUNE 4, 2010 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25017CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Massdot Is Committed to Improving the Quality of Stormwater Runoff from Its Highways
    MassDOT is committed to improving the quality of stormwater runoff from its highways. Through the “Impaired Waters Program,” MassDOT addresses stormwater runoff from its roadways draining to impaired water bodies as part of compliance with the NPDES Phase II Small MS4 General Permit. Stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are implemented to the maximum extent practicable through two methods: retrofit projects and programmed projects. Retrofit projects are tracked within the MassDOT Impaired Waters Program Database, while programmed projects are tracked through this Water Quality Data Form (WQDF). The goal of the WQDF is to raise awareness of the necessity to implement stormwater BMPs during programmed projects and to capture information about stormwater BMPs that are implemented. There are two WQDFs required as part of each programmed project. One is specific to the 25% design stage, and the other is specific to the 75% design stage. Please download the latest version of the WQDF from the MassDOT website. Please fill out the tab titled “75% Design Form,” and check the box at the bottom of the form to ensure that all questions have been answered adequately. Please submit this form in Excel format only and name your file with the convention WQDF25_projectnumber.xlsm. Submit the form to your MassDOT project manager as part of the project's electronic submittal. An interactive web map is available to aid in filling out the WQDF. It is available at http://mass.gov/massdot/map/wqdf. If MassDOT has requested that the form be revised and resubmitted, resubmit the form using the naming convention WQDF75_projectnumber_rev.xlsm.
    [Show full text]