DOCSLIB.ORG

Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipelines Doc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipelines Doc Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipelines Doc. no.: SOM-2017-01-RPT-001 Project no.: SOM-2017-01 Rev. no.: 2 Appendix A: Abbreviations Appendix A Abbreviations This appendix lists abbreviations and abbreviated measurements used in this report. Abbreviation Meaning % percent ± plus or minus < less than > greater than ≤ less than or equal to ≥ equal to or greater than ° degree 3D three-dimensional 3LPE three-layer polyethylene AAR American Association of Railways AB Alberta ADCP Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler AG The Michigan Office of Attorney General AIS Automatic Identification System AL Alabama API American Petroleum Institute AR Arkansas ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers BEA Bureau of Economic Analysis BS&W basic sediment and water CFD computational fluid dynamics CFR Code of Federal Regulations CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CN Canadian National Railway CO Colorado CP cathodic protection CPCM cathodic protection current mapping CPM computational pipeline monitoring CS carbon steel CSA Canadian Standards Association CTE coal tar enamel CVN Charpy V-Notch CVN USE Charpy V-Notch Upper Shelf Energy DC direct current DEQ Michigan Departments of Environmental Quality DH hydraulic diameter October 26, 2017 Final Report A-1 Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipelines Doc. no.: SOM-2017-01-RPT-001 Project no.: SOM-2017-01 Rev. no.: 2 Appendix A: Abbreviations Abbreviation Meaning DHI DHI Water & Environment, Inc. DNR Michigan Departments of Natural Resources DNT dent DNV Det Norske Veritas DOT Department of Transportation Dynamic Risk Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems, Inc. e.g. for example EIA Energy Information Administration Enbridge Enbridge Energy Limited EPA Environmental Protection Agency ER electrical resistance ERW electric resistance welded ES environmental score ESA environmentally sensitive area ESI environmental sensitivity index et al. and others etc. et cetera FBE fusion-bonded epoxy FBR full-bore rupture FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FRA Federal Railroad Administration FSH full-screen height FW flash welded GDP gross domestic product GE General Electric GIS Geographic Information System GRT gross register tonnage GTA Greater Toronto Area GW girth weld GWD girth weld H2S hydrogen sulfide HCA high consequence area HD hydrodynamic HDD horizontal directional drilling HF-ERW high-frequency electric resistance welded HPA high population area i.e. that is IBA Important Bird Areas ID internal diameter October 26, 2017 Final Report A-2 Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipelines Doc. no.: SOM-2017-01-RPT-001 Project no.: SOM-2017-01 Rev. no.: 2 Appendix A: Abbreviations Abbreviation Meaning IDC Interest During Construction IL Illinois ILI in-line inspection IMU inertial mapping unit IN Indiana Inc. Incorporated ITOPF International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature KS Kansas L length lat. latitude LDAR leak detection and repair L-DSAW longitudinally double submerged arc-welded LFL lower flammability limit LOF lack of fusion long. longitude LP Lower Peninsula MAE The Michigan Agency for Energy Marysville terminal Marysville Crude Terminal max. maximum MB Manitoba MBES multi-beam echo sounder MBS material balance system MDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MFL magnetic flux leakage MI Michigan MMSI Maritime Mobile Service Identity MN Minnesota MOP maximum operating pressure N/A Not applicable NAIS Nationwide Automatic Identification System NB New Brunswick ND North Dakota NDE non-destructive examination NE northeast NEB National Energy Board NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NGL natural gas liquid no. number October 26, 2017 Final Report A-3 Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipelines Doc. no.: SOM-2017-01-RPT-001 Project no.: SOM-2017-01 Rev. no.: 2 Appendix A: Abbreviations Abbreviation Meaning NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NRDA natural resource damage assessment NWI National Wetlands Inventory NY New York OD outside diameter OH Ohio OMB Office of Management and Budget ON Ontario OPA other population areas OR Oregon OSA other sensitive area PA Pennsylvania or phased array PADD Petroleum Administration for Defense District PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon PGA peak ground acceleration pH acidity and alkalinity PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (U.S. Department of Transportation) prorata proportional Q quarter QC Quebec Re Reynolds Number RIAM rapid impact assessment matrix RIMS Regional Input-Output Modeling System ROW right-of- way RPP refined petroleum product RT receipt tankage SCADA supervisory control and data acquisition SCC stress corrosion cracking SDS Sarnia Downstream System SEC Securities Exchange Commission (United States) SI International System of Units (Système International d’Unités) SIA social impact assessment SLEAF Scanning Laser Environmental Airborne Fluorosensor SMYS specified minimum yield strength SOW Statement of Work SSC sulfide stress cracking Straits Straits of Mackinac Straits pipelines Enbridge Inc. Line 5 pipelines, located along the Straits of Mackinac SW spectral wave or southwest October 26, 2017 Final Report A-4 Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipelines Doc. no.: SOM-2017-01-RPT-001 Project no.: SOM-2017-01 Rev. no.: 2 Appendix A: Abbreviations Abbreviation Meaning TBM tunnel boring machine TCPL TransCanada Pipelines the project Analysis for Straits of Mackinac Pipelines Project the State the State of Michigan (collectively, the Michigan Departments of Environmental Quality and Natural Resources, The Michigan Agency for Energy, and The Michigan Office of Attorney General). this report Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipelines TMCP thermomechanical controlled processing TOFD time of flight diffraction TX Texas U.S. United States UDM Unified Dispersion Model US United States US DOT Straits ILI U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Review USA United States of America USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USBEA United States Bureau of Economic Analysis USD United States dollars US DOT United States Department of Transportation USE upper shelf energy VA Virginia VHF very high frequency VIV vortex-induced vibration vs. versus W width WI Wisconsin WSD working stress design WV West Virginia y year ZOE zone of exposure October 26, 2017 Final Report A-5 Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipelines Doc. no.: SOM-2017-01-RPT-001 Project no.: SOM-2017-01 Rev. no.: 2 Appendix B: References Appendix B References This appendix lists references used in this report. 1. United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan Southern Division. Case 1:16-cv-00914- GJQ-ESC, ECF No. 14 filed 05/23/17. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017- 06/documents/enbridge_consent_decree.pdf. 2. Michigan, State of. Request for Information and Proposals. Lansing, Michigan, USA : s.n., February 22, 2016. 3. U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Data and Statistics. [Online] https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/library/data-stats. 4. Office of Management and Budget. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-4. Office of Management and Budget / Archives White House. [Online] September 17, 2003. Circular A-4; Also available from Department of Transportation https://www.transportation.gov/regulations/omb-circular-no-4 . https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/circulars_a004_a-4/. 5. Analysis, US Bureau of Economic. Regional Input-Output Modeling System (RIMS II). Regional Economic Accounts. [Online] December 2016. https://bea.gov/regional/rims/. 6. US Bureau of Economic Analysis. RIMS 2 Users Guide. [Online] December 2016. https://bea.gov/regional/pdf/rims/RIMSII_User_Guide.pdf. https://bea.gov/regional/rims/. 7. Lynch, Tim. Analyzing the Economic Impact of Transportation Projects Using RIMS II, IMPLAN and REMI. Institute for Science and Public Affairs, Florida State University. Tallahassee : Center for Economic Forecasting and Analysis, 2000. p. 32. 8. US Army Corps of Engineers. Regional Economic Development (RED) Procedures Handbook . Institute for Water Resources. s.l. : IWR, 2011. p. 82. http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/Portals/70/docs/iwrreports/2011-RPT-01.pdf. 9. Inc., Public Sector Consultants. Michigan ’s Oil and Natural Gas Industry : Economic Contribution. Michigan's Oil and Gas Industry Drives Michigan's Economy. [Online] May 23, 2016. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/michiganoilandgas/pages/105/attachments/original/1464012047 /Michigan_Oil_and_Natural_Gas_Industry_FINAL(2).pdf?1464012047. http://www.michiganoilandgas.org/study_michigan_s_oil_and_gas_industry_drives_michigan_s_econo my. 10. —. Michigan ’s Oil and Natural Gas Industry : Economic Contribution (County by County). [Online] May 23, 2016. Economic_Impact_-_State_and_Counties_Final-1.pdf?1464012087. http://www.michiganoilandgas.org/study_michigan_s_oil_and_gas_industry_drives_michigan_s_econo my. 11. Rosaen, Alex L; Taylor, Traci. Empowering Michigan: Tenth Annual Economic Impact Report of Michigan's University Research Corridor. AEG Anderson Economic Group, LLC. East Lansing : AEG, 2017. January 24, 2017. 12. Irani, Daraius; Frye, Raquel; Grimm, Jessica; Menking, Catherine. Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis of Class I Railroads. Towson University Regional Economics Studies Institute. Towson : Association of American railroads, 2016. p. 20. Version 16 May 2016. 13. O'Neil, Brendan; Hopkins, Phil; Gressley,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OIL PIPELINE SAFETY FAILURES in CANADA Oil Pipeline Incidents, Accidents and Spills and the Ongoing Failure to Protect the Public
    OIL PIPELINE SAFETY FAILURES IN CANADA Oil pipeline incidents, accidents and spills and the ongoing failure to protect the public June 2018 OIL PIPELINE SAFETY FAILURES IN CANADA | Équiterre 2 Équiterre 50 Ste-Catherine Street West, suite 340 Montreal, Quebec H2X 3V4 75 Albert Street, suite 305 Ottawa, ON K1P 5E7 © 2018 Équiterre By Shelley Kath, for Équiterre OIL PIPELINE SAFETY FAILURES IN CANADA | Équiterre 3 TABLE DES MATIÈRES Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 A. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 B. Keeping Track of Pipeline Problems: The Agencies and Datasets ..................................................................10 C. Québec’s Four Oil Pipelines and their Track Records .........................................................................................15 D. Pipeline Safety Enforcement Tools and the Effectiveness Gap .......................................................................31 E. Conclusion and Recommendations .........................................................................................................................35 Appendix A .........................................................................................................................................................................37 OIL PIPELINE
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Facts About Line 5
    June 27, 2014 SUBMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Hon. Bill Schuette Hon. Dan Wyant Attorney General Director Michigan Dept. of Attorney General Michigan Department of 6th Floor G. Mennen Williams Building Environmental Quality 525 W. Ottawa Street Constitution Hall P.O. Box 30755 525 W. Allegan Street Lansing, MI 48909 P.O. Box 30473 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: Enbridge Lakehead System Line 5 Pipelines at the Straits of Mackinac Dear Attorney General Schuette and Director Wyant: Thank you very much for the opportunity to discuss Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership’s Line 5 pipeline crossing of the Straits of Mackinac. We appreciate the dialog that has already occurred to provide some clarity and understanding in relation to the information requests that accompanied your letter of April 29, 2014. In order to fully understand the current situation and our responses to the information requests, I would like to provide some background information to you about the history of Line 5’s Straits crossing, about Enbridge’s operations, and about the significant economic benefits Enbridge’s Line 5 has brought Michigan and its citizens since it entered service in 1953. Historical Facts about Line 5 In 1953, one of the greatest pipeline engineering achievements of its time was completed with the construction of a new 30-inch pipeline from Superior, Wisconsin to Sarnia, Ontario, and also serving Michigan. One of the most notable achievements during construction of this 645-mile line was the 4.6-mile crossing of the Straits of Mackinac in up to 220 feet of water. While such a long crossing had not been attempted before, engineering specialists from Bechtel, the Department of Naval Studies of the University of Michigan, as well as specialists from Columbia University came together to address the challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Pipeline Transportation System Energy Market Assessment
    National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie Permission to Reproduce Materials may be reproduced for personal, educational and/or non-profit activities, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the National Energy Board, provided that due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the information reproduced; that the National Energy Board is identified as the source institution; and that the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the information reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of the National Energy Board. For permission to reproduce the information in this publication for commercial redistribution, please e-mail: [email protected] Autorisation de reproduction Le contenu de cette publication peut être reproduit à des fins personnelles, éducatives et/ou sans but lucratif, en tout ou en partie et par quelque moyen que ce soit, sans frais et sans autre permission de l’Office national de l’énergie, pourvu qu’une diligence raisonnable soit exercée afin d’assurer l’exactitude de l’information reproduite, que l’Office national de l’énergie soit mentionné comme organisme source et que la reproduction ne soit présentée ni comme une version officielle ni comme une copie ayant été faite en collaboration avec l’Office national de l’énergie ou avec son consentement.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis-Induced Learning and Issue Politicization in the Eu: the Braer, Sea Empress, Erika,Andprestige Oil Spill Disasters
    doi: 10.1111/padm.12170 CRISIS-INDUCED LEARNING AND ISSUE POLITICIZATION IN THE EU: THE BRAER, SEA EMPRESS, ERIKA,ANDPRESTIGE OIL SPILL DISASTERS WOUT BROEKEMA This article explores the relation between issue politicization and crisis-induced learning by the EU. We performed a political claims analysis on the political response to the four major oil spill disasters that have occurred in European waters since 1993. Political claims that we observed in three arenas (mass media, national parliaments, and the European Parliament) were compared with recommen- dations in post-crisis evaluation reports and the EU’s legislative responses. For all three political arenas our findings indicate that politicization of issues either promotes or impedes crisis-induced EU learning, which points to the existence of determining intervening factors. EU legislation that is adopted in response to oil spill disasters appears to a large extent grounded in crisis evaluation reports. Characteristics of crisis evaluation reports, especially the degree of international focus, seem to offer a more plausible explanation for variance in crisis-induced learning outcomes than politi- cization. INTRODUCTION On 15 January 1996, the Liberian-registered oil tanker Sea Empress ran aground on the rocks at the entrance to Milford Haven, releasing 72,000 tonnes of oil into the sea in the following days. Only three years later, on 12 December 1999, a very similar accident occurred in the European Atlantic when the Maltese-registered tanker Erika sank due to rough weather conditions off the Brittany coast, causing an oil spill of 20,000 tonnes. Both accidents had a dramatic long-term environmental, social, and economical transboundary impact (EMSA 2004; Wene 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Profile of South African Cadets and Implications for Career Awareness
    1 TABLE OF CONTENTS NO. TOPIC PAGE NO. 1 Ten Lessons in providing MET remotely by Quentin N. Cox 1 2. SAMTRA’s road to e-Learning in the South African Maritime industry by Gregory Moss 15 3. Using multimedia to understand ship design by Ashok Mulloth 29 4. Innovative manoeuvring support by simulation augmented methods – on-board and from the shore methods - on board and from shore by Knud Benedict, Michael Gluch, Sandro Fischer and Michele Schaub 36 5. The 3-D simulation of collision detection and response between ships in navigational simulator by Guan Ke-ping, Ying Shijun, Jia Dongxing and Jiang Jingnan 52 6 Application of marine simulators to bridge the gap between theory and practice in BRM teaching by Chen Jin-biao, Guan Ke-ping, Jia Dong-Xing and Zhuang Xinqing 63 7. Developing maritime theoretical education tools for a lack of seagoing exposure on the part of marine engineering students at CPUT by Derek Lambert 75 8. Looking at human factors in cases of accidents- nurturing inner-motivation and solidarity by Hitosh Sekiya, Takash Shirozu and Katsuya Matsui 82 9. Moving from training to practice- a comparison of the maritime and aviation industry crew resource management education programs by Greg Hanchrow 90 10. The conditional effect of maritime student’s demographic characteristics on career commitment at different levels of career motivation by Shaun Ruggunan and Herbert Kanengoni 99 11. Towards a career capital approach in explaining career development patterns amongst female seafarers in Durban by Slindile Mgaga 109 12. Wellness at sea: a new conceptual framework for seafarer training by Johan Smit 117 13.
    [Show full text]
  • The Edge of Disaster for the Great Lakes
    The Edge of Disaster for the Great Lakes Near Misses from Enbridge’s Aging and Degraded Line 5 The Edge of Disaster for the Great Lakes: Near Misses from Enbridge’s Aging and Degraded Line 5 Table of Contents 3 Three Strikes and You’re Out! 4 A Failed Safety Record, Corroding Pipeline and Corroded Public Trust 5 A Lack of Supports 5 Enbridge Lacks Pipeline Integrity and Insurance 6 A Duty to Protect the Great Lakes Now 7 Achieve True Energy Security Through Alternatives 8 What You Can Do “ [T]he Coast Guard is not semper paratus [always prepared] for a major pipeline oil spill in the Great Lakes.” Admiral Paul Zukunft, Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard THE EDGE OF DISASTER FOR THE GREAT LAKES 1 very day 540,0000 barrels of oil and natural gas liquids are carried along the bottom of the environ- mentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac, moving Ethrough pipelines with walls less than one inch thick. Line 5 runs 645 miles from Superior, Wisconsin to Sarnia, Ontario and was constructed in 1953 with a payment by Enbridge Energy of only $2,450 to the state of Michigan for an easement under the Straits. It is this easement agreement with the state of Michigan, which includes clear Source: University of Michigan Water Center requirements for operating the pipeline with due care, that has driven a campaign for transparency and account- ability against the operators, Enbridge Energy, to ensure unique and fragile environment of the Straits. Required that public trust in the Great Lakes is protected. This transparency has revealed that Line 5’s protective coating is report documents recent near disasters, which could have currently, or has previously been shown to be, missing in up resulted in a catastrophic spill, and are a result of poor to 47 locations, at least 16 locations have lacked the oversight and management from both Enbridge and state required structural support to hold the line safely in place, and federal agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Concerned Resident of Michigan, I Am Asking That You Please Deny The
    From: Sherri Valdes To: LARA-MPSC-EDOCKETS Subject: Case No. U-20763 Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 12:37:47 PM As a concerned resident of Michigan, I am asking that you please deny the application for Enbridge Energy's proposed Line 5 tunnel project under the Straits of Mackinac. We can no longer allow Enbridge to endanger our precious waterways and resources. Regards, Sherri Valdes Howell, Michigan Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. From: Deb Hansen To: LARA-MPSC-EDOCKETS Subject: Comments Regarding Case No. U-20763 Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:46:52 AM RE: Case U-20763 Dear MPSC Commissioners, I am writing to ask you to reject Enbridge Energy’s request for a declaratory ruling that they do not need MPSC approval for their proposal to move forward with a tunnel at the Straits of Mackinac. I live near the Straits, so this is very personal for me. I do not want to see my home turned into an industrial zone to meet Canada's energy needs. I am also someone who respects the sanctity of the land and the water. The tunnel would literally be a rape of the Straits. Given the grim realities of climate destabilization, for the State of Michigan to enable a massive investment in fossil fuel infrastructure, the energies that are stealing the future of our children and grandchildren, is perverse. The construction of a tunnel not maintenance as suggested. This tactic is an industry strategy that's been proven successful in skirting legal protections. We saw that after Enbridge's dilbit spill on the Kalamazoo River.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of a Line 5 Shutdown
    Line 1, 2B, 3, 4, 65, 67 Gretnana Montreal Line 1, 2B, 3, 4, 67 Superior Line 5 Clearbrook Line 9 Lewiston Line 7 Toronto Line 6, 14, 61 Line 10 Line 78 Westover Kiantone Stockbridge Nanticoke Delevan Sarnia CanadianLine Mainline 11 Lockport Lakehead System (U.S. Mainline) Line 64 Mokena Toledo EnbridgeLine Pipelines 79 (Joint Ownership) Other Enbridge Lines Manhattan Grith/Hartsdale Line 55 Enbridge Crude Oil Storage Flanagan City/TownLine 17 Salisbury Patoka Line 62 The impactWood River of a Line 5 shutdown Enbridge’s Line 5 has been a vital Enbridge’s Line 5 is a 645-mile, 30-inch- • Michigan would face a 756,000-US-gallons- piece of energy infrastructure diameter pipeline that travels through Michigan’s a-day propane supply shortage, since there since 1953—not just for Michigan, Upper and Lower Peninsulas—originating in are no short-term alternatives for transporting but for the entire U.S. Midwest and Superior, Wisconsin, and terminating in Sarnia, NGL to market. Ontario, Canada. points beyond. • The region (Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Line 5 transports up to 540,000 barrels per day Ontario and Quebec) would see a For more than 65 years, Line 5 has (bpd), or 22.68 million US gallons per day, of light 14.7-million-US-gallons-a-day supply delivered the light oil and natural crude oil, light synthetic crude and natural gas shortage of gas, diesel and jet fuel (about liquids (NGLs), which are refined into propane. 45% of current supply). gas liquids (NGL) that heat homes and businesses, fuel vehicles and Line 5 supplies 65% of propane demand • Michigan would need to find an alternative in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, and 55% of supply for anywhere from 4.2 million to power industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Crude Oil Production: Alternatives to Enbridge Line 5 for Transportation
    MICHIGAN CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION: ALTERNATIVES TO ENBRIDGE LINE 5 FOR TRANSPORTATION Prepared for National Wildlife Federation By London Economics International LLC 717 Atlantic Ave, Suite 1A Boston, MA, 02111 August 23, 2018 Michigan crude oil production: Alternatives to Enbridge Line 5 for transportation Prepared by London Economics International LLC August 23, 2018 London Economics International LLC (“LEI”) was retained by the National Wildlife Federation (“NWF”) via a grant from the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, to examine alternatives to Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership (“Enbridge”) Line 5 for crude oil producers in Michigan. About sixty-five percent of the crude oil produced in Michigan currently uses Enbridge Line 5 to reach markets. This production is located in the Northern and Central regions of the Lower Peninsula. Oil production from the Southern region of the Lower Peninsula does not use Enbridge Line 5 to reach markets. LEI’s key findings are that the lowest-cost alternative to Enbridge Line 5 would be trucking from oil wells to the Marysville market area. LEI estimates that the increase in transportation cost to oil producers in the Northern region would be $1.31 per barrel based on recent oil production levels and recent trucking costs. For the Central region, the cost increase on average would be less, as these producers are located closer to markets. There would be no impact on Southern region producers. The $1.31 per barrel cost increase amounts to 2.6 percent of a crude oil price of $50 per barrel. It is much smaller than typical monthly swings in Michigan crude oil prices, which have ranged from $28 per barrel to over $100 per barrel from 2014 through 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Line 5
    MEDIA Enbridge’s Line 5 BACKGROUNDER June 2021 The pipeline’s ongoing environmental risks to the Great Lakes and the climate Context Line 5 is a 68-year-old pipeline operated by Enbridge Energy. It carries up to 540,000 barrels-per-day or 87 million litres of oil and natural gas liquids per day, from Superior, Wisconsin, to Sarnia, Ontario, taking a shortcut through Michigan and along the lake bottom of the Straits of Mackinac. As the pipeline travels through the Straits of Mackinac it diverges into two, 20-inch-diameter, parallel pipelines. This is why people sometimes call the Line 5 pipeline system the “dual” or “twin” pipelines. Figure 1. Map of Line 5 pipeline route1 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE CANADA Media Backgrounder: Enbridge’s Line 5 1 The Mackinac Straits section of Line 5 with a design lifetime of 50 years, has been plagued by a series of issues, ranging from missing protective coating to three dents left by an anchor strike just this past April. It lies in what University of Michigan researchers have called “the worst possible place for an oil spill” in the Great Lakes.2 The Great Lakes are of utmost importance to protect as they hold 21 per cent of the world’s surface freshwater and 84 per cent of North America’s surface freshwater.3 Most of the liquids shipped on Line 5 are delivered to the Sarnia terminal; from there, they supply refineries in Ontario and as far east as the Quebec cities of Montreal and Levis.4 After the anchor strike in April 2020, and ensuing concern about a spill from Line 5, Enbridge proposed to build a tunnel under the Straits of Mackinac to house this leg of Line 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Line 5 Pipeline Plays a Critical Role in Ensuring the United States and Canada Continue to Have Access to Affordable Fuels, Propane and Other Refined Products
    The Line 5 pipeline plays a critical role in ensuring the United States and Canada continue to have access to affordable fuels, propane and other refined products. Union, political and business leaders on both sides of the border are emphasizing the critical role of the Line 5 pipeline and calling for it to remain open until its replacement can be completed: “The USW strongly supports both the Line 5 replacement segment project and the continued operation of the existing pipeline … Hundreds of USW members and their communities depend on the good, family-sustaining jobs Line 5 supports.” United Steelworkers Union, February 1 “We support the pipeline and the tunnel, because Line 5 couldn’t be more important to the Lansing region. Line 5 supplies the fuel our local communities use to power the manufacturing sector and chemistry industry, to run equipment farmers use to put food on our tables, and it even delivers more than half the propane used in Michigan — not just in the Upper Peninsula. We encourage the governor and lawmakers to protect the jobs and investment our communities count on each day. We encourage them to keep Line 5 open and to back the Great Lakes Tunnel.” Business manager of UA Local 333 and President of the Lansing Regional Chamber of Commerce, March 10, 2021 “We continue to advocate for Line 5. We recognize how important it is to ensure energy security to both Canadians and Americans. … Line 5 is a vital source of fuel for homes and businesses on both sides of the border. That is something we have argued strongly, and will continue to argue strongly, with members of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Over Troubled Water the Enbridge Gxl System’S Threat to the Great Lakes
    ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES WRITING TEAM: KENNY BRUNO, CATHY COLLENTINE, DOUG HAYES, JIM MURPHY, PAUL BLACKBURN, ANDY PEARSON, ANTHONY SWIFT, WINONA LADUKE, ELIZABETH WARD, CARL WHITING PHOTO CREDIT: SEAWIFS PROJECT, NASA/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, AND ORBIMAGE ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes A B ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE . 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 DOUBLE CROSS — ­ENBRIDGE’S SCHEME TO EXPAND TRANSBORDER TAR SANDS OIL FLOW WITHOUT PUBLIC OVERSIGHT . 6 CASE STUDY IN SEGMENTATION: FLANAGAN SOUTH . 8 THREAT TO THE HEARTLAND: WISCONSIN THE TAR SANDS ARTERY . 9 ENBRIDGE’S “KEYSTONE KOPS” FOUL THE KALAMAZOO . 11 TAR SANDS INVASION OF THE EAST . 1 3 “THE WORST POSSIBLE PLACE” — LINE 5 AND THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC . 1 4 OF WILD RICE AND FRACKED OIL — THE SANDPIPER PIPELINE . 18 ABANDONMENT: ENBRIDGE LINE 3 MACHINATIONS . 21 NORTHERN GATEWAY . 23 CONCLUSIONS . 24 TAR SANDS MINING IN ALBERTA CANADA. PHOTO CREDIT: NIKO TAVERNISE PREFACE If you drive a car in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois or Michigan, chances are there’s tar sands in your tank. That fuel probably comes to you courtesy of Canada’s largest pipeline company, Enbridge. This report tells the story of that company and its system of oil pipelines in the Great Lakes region. TAR SANDS OIL refers to a class of crude oils that Before there was Keystone, there was the Lakehead System.
    [Show full text]