Jean Luc Marion Descartes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jean Luc Marion Descartes Jean luc marion descartes Continue This article relies on references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. In 2020 he was written by the International (Learn How and When to Remove This Template Message) Jean-Luc MarionBorn (1946-07-03) 3. 1946 (age 74)Meudon, Hauts-de-Seine, FranceAlma materÉcole Normale SupérieureEra20th/21st-century philosophyRegionWestern philosophySchoolPhenomenologyPostmodernismMain interests Philosophical theology, Phenomenology, DescartesNotable ideasSo much reduction, so much givenness, saturated phenomenon, the willality of love Influences AugustineAlthusserBalthasarBarthBernard by ClairveauxBergsonBruaireDaniélouDerridaDescartesHeideggerHenryHusserlKantLévinasPseudo-Denys Influenced Falque Part of a series about the American theology Background Theology · Early Christianity · Timeline · History of Christianity · Ecclesiastial politet · Trinitarianism · Non-rinitarianism · Restoration · Christology · Mariology · Biblical Canon · Deuterocanonical books · Persecution and Tolerance Ecumenical Creeds Apostles · Nicene Chalcedonian · Athanasian Patristics and Councils Church Fathers · Augustine Nikea · Ephesus · Chalcedon Post-Nicene Development Kjetinn · Monophysitis · Monothelitism · Iconoclasm · Gregor I · Alcuin · Phoenician · East-West Schism · Skolastism · Aquinas · Anselm · Palamas Reformation Reformation · Luther (Martin Luther's Theology) · Melanchthon · Leave · Reason · Five Solas · 95 Dice · Book of Concord · Predetermination · Calvinism · Arminianism · Norwegian Reformation · Counter-reform · Trent Since the Reformation Pietism · John Wesley · Major awakenings · Holiness movement · Restoration movement · Existentialism · Liberalism (secular theology · Modernism in the Catholic Church) · Nouvelle théologie · Postliberal theology · Postmodernism · Neo-Orthodoxy · Paleo Orthodoxy · Vatican II · Hermeneutics · Liberation theology · Christian anarchism · Christian feminism (Asian feminist theology) · Queer theology · Progressive Christianity · Teothanatology · Critical realism · Follow-up (Situational Ethics · Christian hedonism) · Transmodernism · Process tology · Jean-Luc Marion (born 3 July 1946) is a French philosopher and Catholic theologian. Marion is a former student of Jacques Derrida whose work is informed by patristic and mystical theology, phenomenology and modern philosophy. [1] Much of his academic work has treated Descartes and phenomenologists such as Martin Heidegger and Edmund Husserl, but also religion. God without being, for example, is concerned with an analysis of idolatry, a theme strongly related to Marion's work with love and which is a concept that is also explored in length by Derrida. In 1946 Marion was born in Meudon, Hauts-de-Seine. He studied at the University of Nanterre (now the University of Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense) and the Sorbonne and then did graduate work in philosophy from the École Normale Supérieure in Paris, where he was taught by Jacques Derrida, Louis Althusser and Gilles Deleuze. [2] At the same time, Marion's deep interest in theology was privately cultivated under the personal influence of theologians such as Louis Bouyer, Jean Daniélou, Henri de Lubac and Hans Urs von Balthasar. From 1972 to 1980 he studied for his Doctorate and worked as an assistant lecturer at the Sorbonne. After receiving his Doctorate in 1980, he began teaching at the University of Poitiers. [2] Career From there he moved to become director of philosophy at the University of Paris X - Nanterre, and in 1991 he also took up the role of professeur invité at the Institut Catholique de Paris. In 1996 he became director of philosophy at the University of Paris IV (Sorbonne), where he still teaches. Marion became a visiting professor at the University of Chicago Divinity School in 1994. He was then appointed Professor of Religious and Theology at John Nuveen there in 2004, a position he held until 2010. In November 2008, Marion was elected as the umortel of the Académie française. Marion now has room for seat 4, an office previously held by Cardinal Lustiger. [6] His awards include:[6][8] Premio Joseph Ratzinger of the Fondazione Vaticana Joseph Ratzinger – Benedetto XVI (2020) Karl Jaspers Prize in the City and the University of Heidelberg (2008). Grand Prix de philosophie de l'Académie française (1992), for its entire oeuvre Prix Charles Lambert de l'Académie des sciences morales et politiques (1977) Philosophy Marion's phenomenal work is set out in three volumes that together form a triptych[9] or trilogy. Etudes sur Husserl, Heidegger et la phénoménologie (1989) is a historical study of the phenomenal method followed by Husserl and Heidegger, with the aim of suggesting future directions for phenomenological research. The unexpected reaction that Réduction's donation provoked required clarification and full development. This was addressed in Étant donné: Essai d'une phénoménologie de la donation (1997), a more conceptual work that examines phenomenal givenness, the saturated phenomenon and the gifted – a reassessment of the subject. You surcroît (2001) gives an in-depth description of saturated phenomena. [11] Givenness Marion that he has tried to radically reduce the entire phenomenal project that begins with the primacy of it of givingness. [12] What he describes as his only theme is the givenness required before phenomena can turn out in consciousness— what turns out first gives itself. [13] This is based on the argument that all attempts to lead phenomena back to the immanence of consciousness, that is, to exert phenomenal reduction, necessarily results in showing that givenness is the only horizon of phenomena[14] Marion radicalizes this argument in the formulation, So much reduction, so much givenness,[15] and offers this as a new first principle of phenomenology , build on and challenging previous formulas of Husserl and Heidegger. [16] The formulation common to both, Marion argues, So much appearance, so much being, adopted from Johann Friedrich Herbart,[17] is mistakenly raised to the status of the only face of Being. In doing so, it leaves itself undetermined, not subject to the reduction, and thus in a typical metaphysical situation. [18] The Hussian phrase, To It Itself!, is criticized on the basis that the things in question would remain what they themselves are without appearing as a subject — again bypassing the reduction or even without becoming phenomena. Appearing becomes only a mode of access to objects, making the formulation insufficient as a first principle of phenomenology. [19] A third formulation, Husserl's Principle of All Principles, states that every primordial date intuition is a source of authority (Rechtsquelle) of knowledge, that what presents itself in 'intuition'... is simply to be accepted as it seems to be, but only within the boundaries where it then presents itself. Marion argues that although the principle of all principles places givenness as the criterion and achievement of phenomenality, the certainty remains unconsrgued. [21] While it concedes limits of intuition (as it gives itself ...but only within the boundaries in which it presents itself), givenness alone is absolute, free and without condition[22] Givenness then is not reducible except itself, and so is freed from the limits of other authority, including intuition; reduced given is either given or not given. So much reduction, so much givenness says that givenness is what the reduction achieves, and any reduced given is reduced to givenness. [23] The more a phenomenon decreases, the more it is given. Marion calls the formulation the last principle, similar to the first, that of the front nest itself. [24] Phenomenological reductions of Husserl, Heidegger and Marion[25] Who are the current things that are led back by the reduction? What is given by the reduction? How are the current things given; what is the horizon? How far reduction go, what is excluded? First reduction – transcendental (Husserl) The intended and constituted I constituted objects through regional ontologies. Through formal ontology, regional ontologies fall within the horizon of objectivity Excludes anything that cannot be directed back to objectivity Other reduction – existential (Heidegger) Dasein: a intent extended to be-in-the-world and led back to its transcendent of beings through anxiety The different ways of being; the phenomenon of being According to being like the original and ultimate phenomenon. According to the horizon of time Excludes what does not need to be, especially the preliminary conditions of the phenomenon of Being, e.g. boredom, the requirement Third reduction – to the givenness (Marion) Interloqué: what is called by the claim of the phenomenon[26] The gift itself; the gift to reproduce to or to evade the claim of the call According to the horizon of the completely unconditional conversation and of completely unlimited response Absence of conditions and provisions of the requirement. Providing everything that can ring and be called By describing the structures of phenomena from the basis of givenness, Marion claims to have succeeded in describing certain phenomena that past metaphysical and phenomenal approaches either ignore or exclude - lattices that turn out, but which a thinking that does not go back to given is powerless to receive. [27] In total, three types of phenomena can appear, according to the proportionality between what is given in intuition and what is intended: Phenomena in which little or nothing is given in intuition.
Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Contemporary Faith Wes Campbell, November 2011
    1 A Guide to Contemporary Faith Wes Campbell, November 2011 Introduction Our time presents a crisis for Christian faith. In our situation which some describe as ‘post-Christian’ or post-Christendom, the challenge reaches into the heart of faith, challenging God in the name of ‘atheism’1. The crisis produces both pastoral and intellectual challenges, as the Christian community seeks to chart a way in our contemporary world. Often it is suggested that there are but two ways of responding, each offering an extreme position: either, a return to pre-modern (fundamentalist) ways of thinking, or, an unqualified (progressive) acceptance of modernist (or postmodernist) modes of thought. It sometimes seems as if we are being required to choose between two different fundamentalisms. However, as Christians grapple with these challenges, we are faced with an even more fundamental challenge: the challenge of God who speaks to our situation, bringing a crisis which challenges, judges and renews the world2. This paper is a brief response to our contemporary situation. Our main interest is to assist people to hear Jesus Christ’s call to discipleship in the 21st century. Here we will be reminded of the basic commitments made as the Uniting Church was formed. The discussion here will offer some pointers for the task of interpreting and understanding the Christian faith now3. Understanding Christian Faith From the beginning understanding biblical faith has been a controversial and challenging matter. The most obvious reason for this is that faith itself emerged from challenging and controversial circumstances. For example, the faith of Israel has its early origins in the escape of Hebrew slaves from Egypt, led by Moses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trinity for Unitarians 1
    The Trinity for Unitarians - An Overview in 4 Parts by Rev. Tony Lorenzen pg. 1 The Trinity for Unitarians 1 – Overview and Method Method “You might say that Unitarianism has become dogmatic for us — the Trinity being something that a "good" UU simply cannot believe in because we are, by default, anti-Trinitarians. I'd suggest instead that UUs celebrate theological liberalism as a method rather than as a set of theological conclusions.” – Chris Walton, Editor UU World (in his blog “Philocrities”). “Christian Faith is the response to Jesus” not “getting back to the religion of Jesus.” The Trinity is part of that response as Jesus communities answer the question “How is God with us?” “When God is too close or too removed, humans take his place." Biblical Studies – historical critical method and the use of reason become the hallmark of anti-trinitarian theological method, yet many if not most of the Unitarian, Universalist and other “heretics” we encounter will use an “uncritical” approach to scripture in their justification for theological positions, even using “proof-texting” or citing scripture texts th uncritically to support their views, well into the 19 ​ century. ​ “Some of us UUs these days are just finding the Trinity a helpful metaphor and a window to God, however smudged.” – Rev. Tony Lorenzen Heresy/Hertics Heresy comes from a greek work meaning “to choose.” A heretic is someone who has not given up the right to choose what to think or what to believe. Heresy is measured in juxtaposition to orthodoxy or “right” thinking. Arianism - from Arius (256-336) north African priest (leader).
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociology of Progressive Religious Groups Why Liberal Religious Groups Cannot Get Together
    A Sociology of Progressive Religious Groups Why Liberal Religious Groups Cannot Get Together A Talk for Sea of Faith Yorkshire, 22 September 2007, Bradford Given by Adrian Worsfold Schisms are normally carried out by traditionalists or conversionists over what is called a "presenting issue". This is not the question here but the inability of liberal groups to get together. Indeed liberals tend not to split off as groups, but they do move out as individuals. When Theophilus Lindsey rejected the 39 Articles of the Church of England and set up the first named Unitarian Church in 1774, he hoped for an exodus of Anglicans to join his new Arian based movement (he followed Samuel Clarke's Arian revision of the Book of Common Prayer). An exodus did not happen. The Arians stayed within the Church of England, and Essex Church as it was called became absorbed into the liberalising Presbyterian movement. Did not these Presbyterians split then, long before? Well, when the Presbyterians broke away from the Church of England they were fiercely Puritan and very trinitarian, with full confidence in the Bible alone to uphold Calvinist doctrine. So this too was an example of an evangelical breakaway. That they became liberal was an unintended consequence of the original Puritan intention, and they were later boosted by ideological liberals (who were also biblical literalists, reading a unitarian doctrine straight off the gospels as, indeed, the New Testament contains no doctrine of the Trinity, only its possibility). So what is this about liberal groups and then not being able to be inclusive of one another? We first need to know what groups we are talking about, what they organise for and how they function.
    [Show full text]
  • Cathedral of Hope: a History of Progressive Christianity, Civil
    CATHEDRAL OF HOPE: A HISTORY OF PROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANITY, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND GAY SOCIAL ACTIVISM IN DALLAS, TEXAS, 1965 -1992 Dennis Michael Mims, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2009 APPROVED: J. Todd Moye, Major Professor Elizabeth Hayes Turner, Committee Member Marilyn Morris, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Michael Monticino, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Mims, Dennis Michael. Cathedral of Hope: A History of Progressive Christianity, Civil Rights, and Gay Social Activism in Dallas, Texas, 1965 - 1992. Master of Science (History), August 2009, 120 pp., 6 photos, references, 48 titles. This abstract is for the thesis on the Cathedral of Hope (CoH). The CoH is currently the largest church in the world with a predominantly gay and lesbian congregation. This work tells the history of the church which is located in Dallas, Texas. The thesis employs over 48 sources to help tell the church’s rich history which includes a progressive Christian philosophy, an important contribution to the fight for gay civil rights, and fine examples of courage through social activism. This work makes a contribution to gay history as well as civil rights history. It also adds to the cultural and social history which concentrates on the South and Southwestern regions of the United States. Copyright 2009 by Dennis Michael Mims ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. AN INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1 II. GAY LIBERATION AND THE BIRTH OF A CHURCH .................. 14 III. MCC DALLAS: THE NEW CHURCH BECOMES AN ANCHOR TO THE GAY COMMUNITY..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Union Ceremonies: How Gnostics Mimic Marriage
    Sacred Union Ceremonies: How Gnostics mimic marriage The Sacred Union Ceremony On 12 June 2010 a sacred union ceremony, organised by Uniting Network Australia, was held at Brunswick Uniting Church in Melbourne to bless same-sex couples in committed relationships. Robed clergy officiated, a sermon was preached, vows were exchanged, certificates signed and a wedding cake provided. The following day President Alistair Macrae received a copy of the liturgy used in the ceremony and advised UNA leaders that ‘if they want clarity in this matter they should consider the usual church processes for introducing it through the Councils of the Church for discussion, discernment and debate.’ 1 In the light of decisions at the 2003 and 2006 Assemblies that implicitly accepted same-sex relations among ordained ministers as a legitimate form of diversity in the UCA, it is not surprising that formal recognition of same-sex relationships is now sought. UNA is highly likely to bring a recommendation on this matter to the Thirteenth Assembly, 15-21 July 2012. As the UCA has never given theological reasons for these seismic changes to the Reformed doctrine of sexuality and marriage, it is necessary to try to understand why something so recently regarded as inimical to human flourishing is now strongly supported and promoted as a positive good and an inalienable right. From Christian Orthodoxy to Gnostic Spirituality The answer is to be found in the shift from Christian patterns of thought to those based on new forms of Gnostic spirituality – an abstract, other worldly philosophy that was parasitic on orthodox Christian belief and focussed on esoteric knowledge (gnosis ) of the spiritual world that is accessible to people when they look deep within themselves.2 Until recently considered to be a relic of a bygone age, and an escape from a robust secular faith, the resurgence of Gnostic spirituality within and beyond the churches is remarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Christianity?
    Touchstone Volume 30 January 2012 Number 1 PROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANITY? CONTENTS Editorials …………...……………………..……….…………………… 3 Articles Making Progress? Edwin Searcy …............................................................................. 7 Post-Theism and the “Problem” of God Peter Wyatt …….......................................................................... 15 The Christology of John Dominic Crossan—and an Alternative Don Schweitzer ............................................................................ 25 The Resurrection of Jesus according to “Progressive Christianity” Harold Wells ................................................................................ 35 Fundamentally Eccentric: Reflections on What It Means to Be Human in Our Time Robert C. Fennell ........................................................................ 44 From the Heart about the Heart of the Matter Marguerite van Die ………………………………...………...…. 51 Profile Eunice Pyfrom Betsy Anderson ........................................................................... 56 2 Touchstone January 2012 Reviews Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy by Eric Metaxas John McTavish ............................................................................ 63 Jews and Anti-Judaism in the New Testament: Decision Points and Divergent Interpretations by Terence L. Donaldson Matthew Thiessen….................................…………………..….. 65 Spirit and Trauma: A Theology of Remaining by Shelly Rambo Don Schweitzer ……….………………………………………... 67 Drawing from the Same Well: The
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecstatic : Late 2019 Issue | 1 News
    the ecstatic : late 2019 issue | 1 News Watch us on FREE Every Week theJesus Trip TheNewMystics.Com/TheJesusTrip SWAT Team Busts up Crowder Meeting in Belarus Belarus, often called the “last dictatorship in Europe” sent a SWAT team Are You Subscribed to Our Free Weekly Videos? of nearly a dozen armed agents in ski masks, helmets, flak jackets and machine guns to break up our church event in May. They detained Are you subscribed to receive our free weekly videos: The Jesus Trip? John, searched and interrogated congregants at gunpoint for three Simply visit our homepage www.thenewmystics.com and enter your hours, confiscating video and sound equipment and locking the pastors email at the top of the page to subscribe. Make sure to add us to your in jail. SOT was able to bail them out after the arrest … but the violation approved sender list so we don’t end up in your email spam box! Our of human rights only stoked the zeal of Gospel drinkers as they begged YouTube has hit 3 million views, and you can also catch every episode John to keep preaching until midnight after the cops left! right on our New Mystics app for iPhone or Android. Some may be of- fended as we happily continue drinking grace straight, but the scandal of the finished work of the cross continues to spread! Thanks to our regular viewers who help us share and repost on social media each week as part of our grassroots “propaganda team!” Russia Gospel Collusion: Grace Awakening is Here Something incredible is happening in Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Luke's Church – Sedona, AZ
    Adult Education – St. Luke’s Church – Sedona, AZ – Class 26 Heresies I – Docetism and Modern Variants March 1, 2020 Note: for ease of accessing the web sites referenced in this handout, download your own PDF copy here: http://www.episcopalnet.org/DBS/Sedona/AdultEducation2019.html and click on the live links in that copy. Questions or comments? Email me at [email protected]. Follow St. Luke’s on Facebook: “St. Luke’s Church Sedona AZ”. I. Opening Prayer ALMIGHTY God, who hast given us thy only-begotten Son to take our nature upon him, and as at this time to be born of a pure virgin; Grant that we being regenerate, and made thy children by adoption and grace, may daily be renewed by thy Holy Spirit; through the same our Lord Jesus Christ, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the same Spirit ever, one God, world without end. Amen. (Collect for the Nativity of our Lord, or the Birthday of Christ, commonly called Christmas Day. BCP, p. 96.) II. Introduction • A Church in crisis: The identity of a Church comes not only from its changing historical and cultural forms but pre-eminently – some of us will argue – from what it believes. The early Church established its teaching about the Person of Christ and the Trinity in the famous four Councils of Nicaea, Constantinople, Ephesus and Chalcedon. The victory did not come easily. Orthodoxy was challenged by deviant teachings presented by attractive and sincere apologists. Such heresies were examined and found wanting. The Creeds of the Four Councils have since formed the faith and the mind of the universal Church with its cornerstone being the uniqueness of Jesus Christ as Son of God and Savior.
    [Show full text]
  • I Am Fearfully and Wonderfully Made: a History of Transgender Identity and What It Means for Progressive Christianity
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Religious Studies Theses Department of Religious Studies 8-8-2017 I am Fearfully and Wonderfully Made: A History of Transgender Identity and What It Means For Progressive Christianity Clara Monique Deal Barlow Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses Recommended Citation Deal Barlow, Clara Monique, "I am Fearfully and Wonderfully Made: A History of Transgender Identity and What It Means For Progressive Christianity." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2017. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses/55 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religious Studies at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I AM FEARFULLY AND WONDERFULLY MADE: A HISTORY OF TRANSGENDER IDENTITY AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR PROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANITY by CLARA MONIQUE DEAL BARLOW Under the Direction of Monique Moultrie, PhD ABSTRACT This thesis traces the historical evolution of the term transgender in the United States, mainly since the Second World War. The history of varying terms and conceptions regarding non-conforming gender identity may help clarify contemporary debates among Christian Evangelicals regarding the creation stories in Genesis and how gender is depicted there. The advantage of presenting a more complex history of Evangelicalism will be to counterbalance the mistaken view that Evangelicals are unilaterally conservative; in fact there is a long history of progressive Evangelicalism in this country. Without a consensus understanding of transgender identity and how it may or may not appear in scripture, churches remain uncertain how best to minister to transgender parishioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorrien-Vitae
    ! Gary Dorrien Reinhold Niebuhr Professor of Social Ethics, Union Theological Seminary Professor of Religion, Columbia University Birthdate: March 21, 1952 Marital: Widower (Married to Brenda L. Biggs from 1979 to 2000) Children: Sara Biggs Dorrien, born January 2, 1986 Ordination: Ordained to Episcopal priesthood, December 18, 1982 Previous Position: Parfet Distinguished Professor, Kalamazoo College EDUCATION B.A., Summa Cum Laude, Alma College 1974; M.Div., Union Theological Seminary 1978; M.A., Princeton Theological Seminary 1979; Th.M., Princeton Theological Seminary 1979; Ph.D., Union Graduate School 1989, D.Litt., MacMurray College, 2005; D.D., Trinity College 2010. BOOKS Logic and Consciousness: The Dialectics of Mind, Hastings Press, 1985. The Democratic Socialist Vision, Rowman & Littlefield, 1986. Reconstructing the Common Good: Theology and the Social Order, Orbis Books, 1990, 1992; Wipf and Stock, 2008. The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture, and the War of Ideology, Temple University Press, 1993, 1994. Page 2! - Vita of Gary Dorrien Soul in Society: The Making and Renewal of Social Christianity, Fortress Press, 1995. The Word as True Myth: Interpreting Modern Theology, Westminster John Knox Press, 1997. The Remaking of Evangelical Theology, Westminster John Knox Press, 1998. The Barthian Revolt in Modern Theology: Theology Without Weapons, Westminster John Knox Press, 2000. The Making of American Liberal Theology: Imagining Progressive Religion, 1805-1900, Westminster John Knox Press, 2001. The Making of American Liberal Theology: Idealism, Realism and Modernity, 1900-1950, Westminster John Knox Press, 2003. Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana, Routledge, 2004. The Making of American Liberal Theology: Crisis, Irony and Postmodernity, 1950-2005, Westminster John Knox Press, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • The Center for Progressive Christianity History, Beliefs, Practices
    The Center for Progressive Christianity An Evaluation from the Theological Perspective of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod September 2010 History, Beliefs, Practices Identity: The Center for Progressive Christianity (TCPC) was founded as a non-profit organization to help churches focus their attention and outreach on people who think of organized religion as repressive or irrelevant to their lives. Through its website, seminars, articles, and children’s curriculum the Center provides networking opportunities and resources for churches and individuals in order to encourage an approach to Christianity that is inclusive, innovative, and informed. Founders: TCPC was founded in 1994 by James Adams, rector of St. Mark’s Episcopal Church, Capitol Hill, in Washington, D. C. In 2005 Fred C. Plumer, a retired United Church of Christ minister from Irvine, California, became president of the organization. Statistics: TCPC claims over 60,000 visitors to its website per month, a mailing list of over 6000 names and organizations, and 17 different denominations represented among its affiliate members. History: TCPC was founded in 1994 by James Adams, rector of St. Mark’s Episcopal Church in Washington, D. C. to encourage churches to focus their attention on people who had come to think of organized religion as “ineffectual, irrelevant, or repressive.”1 Eight distinct points of belief were developed to help churches and individuals identify themselves as progressive with respect to the Christian faith. According to its website, the progressive Christian movement began by “deconstructing the dominant paradigm of the faith in America, taking apart its patriarchy, literalism, and chauvinism.” Along with its website and newsletter, TCPC sponsors conferences, workshops, and online discussion forums to promote its teachings.
    [Show full text]
  • Heretics, the Trinity, and Ecclesiastical Politics…
    © Rev Rex A E Hunt, MSc(Hons) Spirit of Life Unitarian Fellowship Kirribilli NSW An Address given on ‘traditional’ Trinity Sunday, 16 June 2019 HERETICS, THE TRINITY, AND ECCLESIASTICAL POLITICS… “Heresy is a cradle; orthodoxy, a coffin” (Robert G. Ingersoll) “Truth is rarely simple and seldom obvious, which is why mature institutions recognise the importance of conflict and disagreement. Christianity was born in conflict, and it has been characterised by conflict ever since. The Church's obsession with heresy is witness to this fact” (Richard Holloway) Do you consider yourself a heretic? You should. The ancient Greek word for ‘choice’ is the word we know as ‘heresy’. Heretics are people of choice. Well, that all sounds benign. But it hasn’t always been the case. Indeed, since the late second century and maybe even earlier a more negative or sinister interpretation has been give ‘heresy’. (What follows on Irenaeus and Arius is adapted from Paul A Laughlin’s, ‘Heretics or Heroes?’) The whole idea of heresy in its negative sense gained real momentum in the writings of the first important Christian apologist, which is to say ‘defender’ of the faith. He was Irenaeus (ca. 202 CE), a native of Asia Minor who became the bishop of what is now Lyons, France. He authored a book titled Against Heresies, a vigorous attack upon the perceived threat of Gnosticism to what he regarded as orthodoxy—that is, 'right belief'. Irenaeus’ book was so influential, it virtually defined heresy not only among his contemporary defenders of orthodoxy, but among Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and some Protestant Christians well into modern times, including the 21st century! Thus, with the imposition of ‘orthodoxy’, all teachers, particularly those with original minds, were exposed to possible accusations of heresy.
    [Show full text]