Jean Luc Marion Descartes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Jean luc marion descartes Continue This article relies on references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. In 2020 he was written by the International (Learn How and When to Remove This Template Message) Jean-Luc MarionBorn (1946-07-03) 3. 1946 (age 74)Meudon, Hauts-de-Seine, FranceAlma materÉcole Normale SupérieureEra20th/21st-century philosophyRegionWestern philosophySchoolPhenomenologyPostmodernismMain interests Philosophical theology, Phenomenology, DescartesNotable ideasSo much reduction, so much givenness, saturated phenomenon, the willality of love Influences AugustineAlthusserBalthasarBarthBernard by ClairveauxBergsonBruaireDaniélouDerridaDescartesHeideggerHenryHusserlKantLévinasPseudo-Denys Influenced Falque Part of a series about the American theology Background Theology · Early Christianity · Timeline · History of Christianity · Ecclesiastial politet · Trinitarianism · Non-rinitarianism · Restoration · Christology · Mariology · Biblical Canon · Deuterocanonical books · Persecution and Tolerance Ecumenical Creeds Apostles · Nicene Chalcedonian · Athanasian Patristics and Councils Church Fathers · Augustine Nikea · Ephesus · Chalcedon Post-Nicene Development Kjetinn · Monophysitis · Monothelitism · Iconoclasm · Gregor I · Alcuin · Phoenician · East-West Schism · Skolastism · Aquinas · Anselm · Palamas Reformation Reformation · Luther (Martin Luther's Theology) · Melanchthon · Leave · Reason · Five Solas · 95 Dice · Book of Concord · Predetermination · Calvinism · Arminianism · Norwegian Reformation · Counter-reform · Trent Since the Reformation Pietism · John Wesley · Major awakenings · Holiness movement · Restoration movement · Existentialism · Liberalism (secular theology · Modernism in the Catholic Church) · Nouvelle théologie · Postliberal theology · Postmodernism · Neo-Orthodoxy · Paleo Orthodoxy · Vatican II · Hermeneutics · Liberation theology · Christian anarchism · Christian feminism (Asian feminist theology) · Queer theology · Progressive Christianity · Teothanatology · Critical realism · Follow-up (Situational Ethics · Christian hedonism) · Transmodernism · Process tology · Jean-Luc Marion (born 3 July 1946) is a French philosopher and Catholic theologian. Marion is a former student of Jacques Derrida whose work is informed by patristic and mystical theology, phenomenology and modern philosophy. [1] Much of his academic work has treated Descartes and phenomenologists such as Martin Heidegger and Edmund Husserl, but also religion. God without being, for example, is concerned with an analysis of idolatry, a theme strongly related to Marion's work with love and which is a concept that is also explored in length by Derrida. In 1946 Marion was born in Meudon, Hauts-de-Seine. He studied at the University of Nanterre (now the University of Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense) and the Sorbonne and then did graduate work in philosophy from the École Normale Supérieure in Paris, where he was taught by Jacques Derrida, Louis Althusser and Gilles Deleuze. [2] At the same time, Marion's deep interest in theology was privately cultivated under the personal influence of theologians such as Louis Bouyer, Jean Daniélou, Henri de Lubac and Hans Urs von Balthasar. From 1972 to 1980 he studied for his Doctorate and worked as an assistant lecturer at the Sorbonne. After receiving his Doctorate in 1980, he began teaching at the University of Poitiers. [2] Career From there he moved to become director of philosophy at the University of Paris X - Nanterre, and in 1991 he also took up the role of professeur invité at the Institut Catholique de Paris. In 1996 he became director of philosophy at the University of Paris IV (Sorbonne), where he still teaches. Marion became a visiting professor at the University of Chicago Divinity School in 1994. He was then appointed Professor of Religious and Theology at John Nuveen there in 2004, a position he held until 2010. In November 2008, Marion was elected as the umortel of the Académie française. Marion now has room for seat 4, an office previously held by Cardinal Lustiger. [6] His awards include:[6][8] Premio Joseph Ratzinger of the Fondazione Vaticana Joseph Ratzinger – Benedetto XVI (2020) Karl Jaspers Prize in the City and the University of Heidelberg (2008). Grand Prix de philosophie de l'Académie française (1992), for its entire oeuvre Prix Charles Lambert de l'Académie des sciences morales et politiques (1977) Philosophy Marion's phenomenal work is set out in three volumes that together form a triptych[9] or trilogy. Etudes sur Husserl, Heidegger et la phénoménologie (1989) is a historical study of the phenomenal method followed by Husserl and Heidegger, with the aim of suggesting future directions for phenomenological research. The unexpected reaction that Réduction's donation provoked required clarification and full development. This was addressed in Étant donné: Essai d'une phénoménologie de la donation (1997), a more conceptual work that examines phenomenal givenness, the saturated phenomenon and the gifted – a reassessment of the subject. You surcroît (2001) gives an in-depth description of saturated phenomena. [11] Givenness Marion that he has tried to radically reduce the entire phenomenal project that begins with the primacy of it of givingness. [12] What he describes as his only theme is the givenness required before phenomena can turn out in consciousness— what turns out first gives itself. [13] This is based on the argument that all attempts to lead phenomena back to the immanence of consciousness, that is, to exert phenomenal reduction, necessarily results in showing that givenness is the only horizon of phenomena[14] Marion radicalizes this argument in the formulation, So much reduction, so much givenness,[15] and offers this as a new first principle of phenomenology , build on and challenging previous formulas of Husserl and Heidegger. [16] The formulation common to both, Marion argues, So much appearance, so much being, adopted from Johann Friedrich Herbart,[17] is mistakenly raised to the status of the only face of Being. In doing so, it leaves itself undetermined, not subject to the reduction, and thus in a typical metaphysical situation. [18] The Hussian phrase, To It Itself!, is criticized on the basis that the things in question would remain what they themselves are without appearing as a subject — again bypassing the reduction or even without becoming phenomena. Appearing becomes only a mode of access to objects, making the formulation insufficient as a first principle of phenomenology. [19] A third formulation, Husserl's Principle of All Principles, states that every primordial date intuition is a source of authority (Rechtsquelle) of knowledge, that what presents itself in 'intuition'... is simply to be accepted as it seems to be, but only within the boundaries where it then presents itself. Marion argues that although the principle of all principles places givenness as the criterion and achievement of phenomenality, the certainty remains unconsrgued. [21] While it concedes limits of intuition (as it gives itself ...but only within the boundaries in which it presents itself), givenness alone is absolute, free and without condition[22] Givenness then is not reducible except itself, and so is freed from the limits of other authority, including intuition; reduced given is either given or not given. So much reduction, so much givenness says that givenness is what the reduction achieves, and any reduced given is reduced to givenness. [23] The more a phenomenon decreases, the more it is given. Marion calls the formulation the last principle, similar to the first, that of the front nest itself. [24] Phenomenological reductions of Husserl, Heidegger and Marion[25] Who are the current things that are led back by the reduction? What is given by the reduction? How are the current things given; what is the horizon? How far reduction go, what is excluded? First reduction – transcendental (Husserl) The intended and constituted I constituted objects through regional ontologies. Through formal ontology, regional ontologies fall within the horizon of objectivity Excludes anything that cannot be directed back to objectivity Other reduction – existential (Heidegger) Dasein: a intent extended to be-in-the-world and led back to its transcendent of beings through anxiety The different ways of being; the phenomenon of being According to being like the original and ultimate phenomenon. According to the horizon of time Excludes what does not need to be, especially the preliminary conditions of the phenomenon of Being, e.g. boredom, the requirement Third reduction – to the givenness (Marion) Interloqué: what is called by the claim of the phenomenon[26] The gift itself; the gift to reproduce to or to evade the claim of the call According to the horizon of the completely unconditional conversation and of completely unlimited response Absence of conditions and provisions of the requirement. Providing everything that can ring and be called By describing the structures of phenomena from the basis of givenness, Marion claims to have succeeded in describing certain phenomena that past metaphysical and phenomenal approaches either ignore or exclude - lattices that turn out, but which a thinking that does not go back to given is powerless to receive. [27] In total, three types of phenomena can appear, according to the proportionality between what is given in intuition and what is intended: Phenomena in which little or nothing is given in intuition.