EPBC Heritage Management Plan Goldfields Water Supply Scheme, Main Conduit, Western Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EPBC Heritage Management Plan Goldfields Water Supply Scheme, Main Conduit, Western Australia Job No. 16112 EPBC Heritage Management Plan Goldfields Water Supply Scheme, Main Conduit, Western Australia Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Prepared on behalf of Water Corporation of Western Australia August 2016 ABN 91 277 671 706 1/315 Rokeby Road, Subiaco Western Australia 6008 Telephone 08 9381 1666 Facsimile 08 9381 1566 [email protected] www.griffithsarchitects.com.au Cover: GWSS Conduit near Meckering, Griffiths Architects (April 2016) Revision History Date of this revision: 04 May 2017 Document Version Author Status Date Distribution Management Plan 06 Griffiths Architects Referral Draft 04 May 2017 DoE + WC Management Plan 05 Griffiths Architects Referral Draft 06 April 2017 Water Corporation Management Plan 04 Griffiths Architects First Submission 18 Aug 2016 DoE + WC Management Plan 03 Griffiths Architects Final Draft 11 Aug 2016 Water Corporation + NT Management Plan 02 Griffiths Architects Draft 05 July 2016 Water Corporation + NT Management Plan 01 Griffiths Architects Draft 29 June 2016 Water Corporation Executive Summary Executive Summary Introduction The Goldfields Water Supply Scheme (GWSS) is an enormous engineering achievement that brought important benefits to the Goldfields, towns and later agricultural districts along its path. The pipeline was completed in 1903 and spans some 560km between Mundaring and Kalgoorlie. The system continues to operate today, and during its lifetime much has been upgraded, replaced and renewed. The main conduit is included on the National Heritage List (NHL) (place ID 106007) which includes pump stations, reservoirs and tanks. Ownership of the various parts of the system are segmented between different parties, with a number of historic non-operational steam pump stations vested with the National Trust of Australia (WA). This heritage management plan (HMP) concerns heritage management responsibilities for the main conduit by the Water Corporation of Western Australia. The pipeline was originally buried below ground, but the frequency of leaks led to it being excavated and raised above ground during the 1930s. The pipeline has been continually maintained, upgraded and increased in capacity since the time of its construction, almost half of the operational pipeline remains made up of original locking bar pipes. Objective This HMP was prepared to assist the Water Corporation to comply with legislative requirements under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 (EPBC Act). It also assists in the understanding and conservation of the heritage values of the pipeline and offers practical policies that recognise the operational needs of the pipeline. Management The Water Corporation of Western Australia, under the State Government of Western Australia, owns and operates the main conduit, and is responsible for the service and infrastructure of the scheme. Obligations The GWSS is the principal means of water supply to the Goldfields and Wheatbelt. Providing drinking water safely and efficiently is the primary operational consideration of the pipeline, and to do so the pipeline must be maintained, repaired, and upgraded periodically. National heritage values of the GWSS must be maintained, and obligations related to the main conduit arising from the national heritage values must be considered and to the extent possible, protected. Heritage Management Plan | Goldfields Water Supply Scheme | August 2016 i Contents Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. i List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... iv List of Photographs ................................................................................................................................. v 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. The Place ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Terms and Acronyms ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Objective ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.4. Heritage Listings ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.5. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.6. Authors .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.7. Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................... 3 2. Location ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Maps ........................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Historic Background ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.1. Chronology ............................................................................................................................ 10 3.2. History .................................................................................................................................... 10 3.3. Post Construction History of the Main Conduit..................................................................... 34 4. Place Description .......................................................................................................................... 35 4.1. Definition of place ................................................................................................................. 35 4.2. Description of Main Conduit ................................................................................................. 36 4.3. Current Condition .................................................................................................................. 37 4.4. Current situation .................................................................................................................... 37 4.5. Photographs .......................................................................................................................... 38 5. Significance ................................................................................................................................... 45 5.1. Official Values ........................................................................................................................ 45 5.2. Statement of Significance ...................................................................................................... 47 5.3. Other listings ......................................................................................................................... 49 6. Opportunities and Constraints ...................................................................................................... 50 6.1. Obligations ............................................................................................................................ 50 6.2. Operational requirements ..................................................................................................... 50 6.3. Decision making process ....................................................................................................... 50 7. Heritage Management Policy ....................................................................................................... 51 7.1. Policy Summary ..................................................................................................................... 51 7.2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 51 7.3. Policy for new pipeline .......................................................................................................... 51 7.4. Policy for Interpretive and Retained Sites ............................................................................. 53 7.5. Policy for Location of Interpretive and Retained Sites .......................................................... 53 7.6. Policy for non-operational locking bar or Kellerberrin pipeline ............................................ 54 ii Heritage Management Plan | Goldfields Water Supply Scheme | August 2016 Contents 7.7. Policy for non-operational MSCL pipeline ............................................................................. 55 7.8. Policy for removal of locking bar and Kellerberrin pipeline .................................................. 55 7.9. Policy for unused anchor blocks ............................................................................................ 56 7.10. Policy for interpretive sites .................................................................................................... 57 7.11. Policy for pipeline display at presented interpretive sites ...................................................
Recommended publications
  • MONUMENT HILL 1928-2018 the 90Th Anniversary of the Fremantle War Memorial ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    MONUMENT HILL 1928-2018 The 90th anniversary of the Fremantle War Memorial ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ‘Monument Hill 1928-2018’ honours the ‘citizens’ of Fremantle who spent the better part of a decade after the end of WW1 lobbying authorities to build a fitting memorial of remembrance where families and friends could leave flowers and prayers for their war dead. After years of delays, controversies and lack of interest, thousands of people gathered on November 11, 1928, to commemorate the Remembrance Day unveiling of the Sailors and Soldiers Memorial. A collection of more than 3000 pounds was raised to fund the upkeep of the “noble column”. In a fitting repeat of history, ‘Monument Hill 1928-2018’ was made available to the public on Remembrance Day 2018, with all gold donations for the commemorative booklet raised for Legacy WA, which also celebrated its 90th anniversary in 2018. Proudly supported by the City of Fremantle, which subsidised the printing and supplied the stunning cover image of the port city’s much-loved memorial, this historical treasure is available in print and online. Limited copies are available at Fremantle Library. Produced on behalf of Friends of Monument Hill, StreetWise Media thanks all sponsors and supporters who pulled together to produce this special 90th anniversary tribute to the men and women who sacrificed everything to defend Australia and its Allies since WW1. They include - WA Premier Mark McGowan, Fremantle Mayor Brad Pettitt, Federal MP Josh Wilson, State MP Simone McGurk, the Australian War Memorial, the Samson family, former Fremantle mayors Peter Tagliaferri and Richard Utting, Fremantle History Society, Fremantle Inner City Residents Association, the National Hotel, SCOOP Property and Finance, Fremantle resident Ra Stewart and Joint Venture Consulting Group director Ljiljanna Ravlich.
    [Show full text]
  • 4473-COP Web Friendly Pdfs
    Welcome to the Icons of Influence trail When John Septimus Roe first laid out the city of Perth in 1829, he envisioned a powerful city at the centre of a strong, progressive economy. St Georges Terrace was the focus of this design, a broad avenue running parallel to the shores of the majestic Swan River. Pre-eminent early settlers built their residences along the Terrace and many significant civic buildings were also erected here. St Georges Terrace continues its central role as the city’s Icons of powerhouse today. Follow this trail to investigate the history of the city through its iconic places of influence. As you walk along the trail, keep your eyes out for Influence plaques placed in the pavement, in recognition of many people who have influenced the growth of Perth and Perth’s powerful people and Western Australia. places in history 1 Perth Town Hall Corner Hay and Barrack Streets This self-guided trail will take up to two hours. You can join in or depart from the trail anywhere The Perth Town Hall was designed by Richard Roach along the way. Jewell and James Manning and built between 1867 and The trail intercepts with the city’s free CAT bus 1870 using convict labour. service accessing the foreshore, East Perth, Jewell designed many other Northbridge and West Perth (excluding public important Perth buildings holidays). including the Wesley Church Other City Walking Trails: and the Treasury building adjacent to the Town Hall. The Boom or Bust Perth Town Hall was designed Convicts and Colonials on a grand scale to reflect its The Secret of Point Zero children’s trail important role in the administration of the colony, Art City City Parks & Gardens i-City Information and Police Kiosk Murray Street Mall near Forrest Place, Perth 6000 City of Perth Council House, 27 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 1 TRINITY ARC TRINITY Trail prepared by Nichol Business Development 16 CRT LONDON 2 3 4 and the City of Perth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of Sir John Waters Kirwan (1866-1949)
    ‘Mightier than the Sword’: The Life and Times of Sir John Waters Kirwan (1866-1949) By Anne Partlon MA (Eng) and Grad. Dip. Ed This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University 2011 I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not been previously submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. ............................................................... Anne Partlon ii Table of Contents Abstract iv Acknowledgements v Introduction: A Most Unsuitable Candidate 1 Chapter 1:The Kirwans of Woodfield 14 Chapter 2:‘Bound for South Australia’ 29 Chapter 3: ‘Westward Ho’ 56 Chapter 4: ‘How the West was Won’ 72 Chapter 5: The Honorable Member for Kalgoorlie 100 Chapter 6: The Great Train Robbery 120 Chapter 7: Changes 149 Chapter 8: War and Peace 178 Chapter 9: Epilogue: Last Post 214 Conclusion 231 Bibliography 238 iii Abstract John Waters Kirwan (1866-1949) played a pivotal role in the Australian Federal movement. At a time when the Premier of Western Australia Sir John Forrest had begun to doubt the wisdom of his resource rich but under-developed colony joining the emerging Commonwealth, Kirwan conspired with Perth Federalists, Walter James and George Leake, to force Forrest’s hand. Editor and part- owner of the influential Kalgoorlie Miner, the ‘pocket-handkerchief’ newspaper he had transformed into one of the most powerful journals in the colony, he waged a virulent press campaign against the besieged Premier, mocking and belittling him at every turn and encouraging his east coast colleagues to follow suit.
    [Show full text]
  • WEIGHT of the CHAIN Biographies of Mayors and Shire Presidents in Kalgoorlie and Boulder 1895 - 2011
    CITY OF KALGOORLIE-BOULDER WEIGHT OF THE CHAIN Biographies of Mayors and Shire Presidents in Kalgoorlie and Boulder 1895 - 2011 INTRODUCTION The following people who are in this exhibition are men, who have been elected by the people, whom they believed would be best for the community and its progress. All were business men who had a passion for politics and who had the drive to create communities that were progressive for a young country. In 1895 when the Municipality of Kalgoorlie was first gazetted, all Mayors were elected by the people for a year. In effect every year was an election year. Under the Local Government Act of 1960 the Mayor could either be elected by popular vote or appointed from those that were elected. The Councils of Kalgoorlie and Boulder retained the popular elected Mayors. During the course of the Mayor’s term that person is the voice of Council and makes sure the best is done for the local government region the he represents. The Mayor is Chairman of the Council, he presides over meetings; guides and leads the community; carries out civil and ceremonial duties such as Citizenship ceremonies; speaks on behalf of the Council; and liaises with the CEO on local government affairs. The Chairmen of the Roads Board and Shire Presidents biographies have deliberately not been included; those men actually took a back seat to the goings on in Kalgoorlie and Boulder. The Roads Board managed all the land and infrastructure that existed outside the Municipalities boarders. The Roads Board managed the Golden Mile and the small communities that supplied the labour in the mines.
    [Show full text]
  • A Paper for the People? : the Sunday Times 1897-1905
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses : Honours Theses 1993 A paper for the people? : The Sunday Times 1897-1905 Karen Byers Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons Part of the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Byers, K. (1993). A paper for the people? : The Sunday Times 1897-1905. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ theses_hons/294 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/294 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Document
    GriffithREVIEW47.indb 1 21/01/2015 3:43 pm Praise for Griffith Review ‘Essential reading for each and every one of us.’ Readings ‘A varied, impressive and international cast of authors.’ The Australian ‘Griffith Review is a must-read for anyone with even a passing interest in current affairs, politics, literature and journalism. The timely, engaging writing lavishly justifies the Brisbane-based publication’s reputation as Australia’s best example of its genre.’ The West Australian ‘There is a consistently high standard of writing: all of it well crafted or well argued or well informed, as befits the various genres.’ Sydney Review of Books ‘This quarterly magazine is a reminder of the breadth and talent of Australian writers. Verdict: literary treat.’ Herald Sun ‘Griffith Review editor Julianne Schultz is the ultra-marathoner of Australian cultural life.’ Canberra Times ‘At a time when long form journalism is under threat and the voices in our public debate are often off-puttingly condescending, hectoring and discordant, Griffith Review is the elegant alternative.’ Booktopia Buzz ‘Griffith Review is a consistently good journal. There is some terrific writing on display as well as variety and depth to the issues being grappled with.’ The Age ‘Australia’s most important literary essay magazine.’ Courier-Mail ‘At once comfortable and thought-provoking, edgy and familiar, [it] will draw the reader through its pages.’ Australian Book Review ‘Griffith Review is a wonderful journal. It’s pretty much setting the agenda in Australia and fighting way above its weight… You’re mad if you don’t subscribe.’ Phillip Adams ‘Once again, Griffith Review has produced a stunning volume of excellent work.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Inventory
    Heritage Inventory Midland Redevelopment Area July 2016 Page 1 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory DOCUMENT CONTROL ADOPTION DATE: 14 July 2016 AMENDMENT NO. ADOPTION DATE DESCRIPTION {YEAR} {DESCRIPTION} {YEAR} {DESCRIPTION} Page 2 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory Midland Heritage Inventory 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. MANAGEMENT OF PLACES IN THE HERITAGE INVENTORY 7 3. THEMATIC HISTORY OF MIDLAND REDEVELOPMENT AREA 10 4. VICTORIA PRECINCT 21 5. LIST OF PLACES IN THE VICTORIA PRECINCT 25 6. HELENA PRECINCT 83 7. LIST OF PLACES IN THE HELENA PRECINCT 87 8. CLAYTON PRECINCT 149 9. LIST OF PLACES IN THE CLAYTON PRECINCT 153 Page 3 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory 1. Introduction THE INVENTORY The Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority (the Authority) is responsible for the urban renewal of the Midland Redevelopment Area (which includes the Helena, Clayton and Victoria Precincts – the study area) and proposes to recognise and afford protective measures to those places that have cultural heritage significance. The Midland Redevelopment Scheme 2 (the Scheme) empowers the Authority to compile and maintain a list of Heritage Places, called a Heritage Inventory (HI). The Midland HI has been developed in accordance with the provisions of the Heritage of Western Australia Act 1990, which requires all Local Governments to compile an inventory of heritage places as the foundation of sound local heritage planning. As a State government agency, the Authority acknowledges its role and responsibilities in “recognising, promoting and protecting” the cultural heritage that falls under its jurisdiction, as articulated in the State Cultural Heritage Policy. The Midland HI comprises a list of heritage places that are of cultural heritage significance to both local and State communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Whose City/Whose Fremantle?' Reconceptualising Space for an Open Politics of Place
    Faculty of Humanities School of Social Sciences and Asian Languages ‘Whose City/Whose Fremantle?’ Reconceptualising Space for an Open Politics of Place Shaphan Leon Cox This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University October 2012 Declaration To the best of my knowledge and belief this thesis contains no material previously published by any other person except where due acknowledgment has been made. This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. Signature: …………………………………………. Date: ………………………... ii Abstract The notion of space being eroded by time underpins the dominant formulations of globalisation premised on time-space compression. The consequences have included the announcement of the ‘end of geography’. More recently, a spatial turn has repositioned the concept of space at the forefront of Human Geography. The aim of this thesis is to contribute to the ongoing theoretical reconceptualisation of space with an empirical study of the contested port city of Fremantle. Set within the broader metropolitan area of Western Australia’s capital city, Perth, Fremantle is simultaneously constructed by local and external actors as a ‘city under threat’ and as a ‘city in decline’. It is the dominant port city of Western Australia and differs in many ways, historically, physically, culturally and economically from its modern, suburban surrounds. Using the question ‘whose city’ in my interactions and observations within Fremantle, I began to see contestations for space emerging. This thesis explores four controversies pertinent to the ongoing battles to define (the meaning of spaces within) Fremantle.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Francis Allen (1869-1933) Was Born 6 August 1869 at Perranzabuloe, Cornwall, England, Son of William Allen, Carpenter, and Salome, Née Williams
    J.F. Allen (Battye, J.S., Cyclopedia of Western Australia, Vol.1, 1912, p.567; RIAWA c.1930) Joseph Francis Allen (1869-1933) was born 6 August 1869 at Perranzabuloe, Cornwall, England, son of William Allen, carpenter, and Salome, née Williams. Allen moved with his parents to Parramatta, New South Wales when he was 10 years old, and in 1884 was articled to Scottish-born architect Gordon McKinnon (1856-1922) in Sydney. Allen then worked for Rhodes & Co, civil engineers, and from 1894 for Henry Simon & Co, milling engineers. In 1896 he moved to Western Australia where, after working as an assistant engineer on the Fremantle harbour works, he commenced practice as an architect in 1897. With two of his brothers acting as groomsmen, Joseph married Jean Symington Buntine at the East Fremantle Presbyterian Church in September 1900, and they had a daughter Janet in 1902. Living exclusively in the Fremantle area after arrival in WA, Allen was very active with civic, commercial and residential work around the port, but he also designed buildings at many other places around the Perth metropolitan area and in the State of Western Australia. Some of Allen’s better-known individual works included the East Fremantle Town Hall (1899); a hall and offices at Midland Junction for the WA Locomotive Union (1903); two explosives magazines at Woodman’s Point for Elder & Shenton (1903); the Fremantle Trades Hall (1904); the Strelitz Buildings, Hay through to Murray Streets, Perth (1907); and the Victoria District Co-Op flour mill at Geraldton (1909). One of Allen’s engineering achievements was the design and supervision in 1905 of the first steel ship built in WA, the 133 foot long Westralian, which amongst other journeys, was used for Fremantle to Rottnest Island voyages.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]> Subject: Menzies Station Building Licence
    From: Hannah Mackey <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2020 1:20 PM To: Richard Brookes <[email protected]> Subject: Menzies Station Building Licence Hi Richard, Thanks for your call. I’ve attached the expired Licence for the station building as requested. It looks like the building was licensed as a museum. As discussed, if you could please confirm whether the building is still occupied by the Shire and if you have any desire to enter into a new Licence for use of the building. Feel free to get in touch if you have any queries. Kind regards, Hannah Hannah Mackey Property Contracts Specialist Arc Infrastructure Level 3, 1 George Wiencke Drive, Perth Airport, WA, 6105 GPO Box S1411, Perth WA 6845 T – (08) 9442 8806 | M – 0436 694 227 E – [email protected] W – arcinfra.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________ NOTICE - This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only for the use of the person to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then you have received this e-mail in error; please advise us immediately if this is the case. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Arc Infrastructure. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________ WestNet <£. CONTRACT/DEED EXECUTION FORM Licence to Use Corridor Land & Buildings DOCUMENT NAME/TITLE PARTIES TO CONTRACT/DEED WestNet Rail Pty Ltd Shire of Menzies WestNet Rail Pty Ltd DOCUMENT ORIGINATOR WestNet Rail Pty Ltd PREPARED BY To grant the Shire the right to access and use the PURPOSE OF CONTRACT/DEED Heritage listed station building at Menzies for community use (museum and car parking).
    [Show full text]
  • Lo Res 50 Years Council Ho
    50 Years: Council House 1963 – 2013 Published by the City of Perth Project Curator/Writer: Jo Darbyshire Artists Commemorative Project Curator: Isobel Wise Book design and typography: Brown Cow Design ISBN no 978-0-9808513-5-9 The City of Perth aims to make the history of the city of Perth a living history and show the role of the Council in contributing to the cultural life of the city. Thank you to the staff of Arts and Cultural Development, Community Services Unit, the City of Perth History Centre, Parks and Landscape Services, International Relations and CEO’s Unit at the City of Perth. Thank you also to former Art Curator Belinda Cobby for initial development, former Project Manager Abe Ashbil, the staff of the National Trust (WA) and Christine Lewis, Manager Heritage South, Department of Indigenous Affairs, for advice. Thank you to Geoffrey London and Robert Bell for their essays commissioned for this publication and the artists involved in the Artists Commemorative Project; Maggie Baxter, Sandra Black, Helena Bogucki, Andrew Nicholls and Denise Pepper. We also thank FINK & CO for the design and production of the contemporary Council House trays. The City of Perth is grateful to the State Library of Western Australia for the assistance in sourcing photographs for this publication with permission from the Library Board of Western Australia. Thank you also to the West Australian newspaper, Australia Post, Richard and Lyn Woldendorp, Ivan King from the Performing Arts Museum, His Majesty’s Theatre, and Sarah Toohey from the Old Law Court Museum. Thank you to Don Bailey and the many architects who have also supplied information for this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Greg James CV
    CURRICULUM VITAE GREG JAMES Born 1954 – Perth, Western Australia (WA) BIOGRAPHY 1972 Diploma of Fine Art (Sculpture), Claremont School of Art 1975 - 76 Study Tour of Europe 1976 - 79 Sculpture Technician, Claremont School of Art, Western Australia 1989 - 92 Artworks in Public Places Working Party, City of Fremantle 1979 onwards Practicing Sculptor 2007 - Public Art Taskforce, City of Fremantle. AWARDS 1981, 81, 83 Waterway Award Armadale, WA 1981, 96, 97 West Australian Arts Council (ARTSWA) Special Purpose Grant 1991 City of Fremantle - Gemellagio, Travel Award 2003 City of Fremantle - Spirit of Heritage Award 2005 City of Wanneroo Art Awards - Sculpture 2005 Fremantle & East Fremantle Heritage Award COLLECTIONS Wesfarmers Rural, WA Kings Park Botanical Gardens, WA Fremantle Sailing Club, WA Jackson McDonald Solicitors, WA Shenton College, Shenton Park, WA Gold Corp, Royal Perth Mint, WA Claremont School of Art, WA City of Fremantle, WA Kalgoorlie School of Mines, WA Christensen Collection Waterway Farm Studio, WA Gomboc Gallery, Middle Swan, WA Penhros College, Como, WA Murdoch University, WA University of Western Australia (UWA) West Australian Ballet St Bridgid’s Church, West Perth, WA Servite College, Tuart Hill, WA Western Mining Corporation, WA 3M Collection, Italy. Our Ladies Assumption Church, WA City of Perth, WA Perth College, Mt Lawley, WA Scotch College, Swanbourne, WA Department of Planning and Infrastructure WA Department of Education & Training, WA The Australia Day Council of WA Rotary Club of Wanneroo, WA East Perth Redevelopment Corp, WA The Ex-Services Alliance, Monument Hill, WA Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd., WA Marriage Guidance Council of WA Pietro Porcelli Memorial Fund, WA L & E McFarlane, Zurich, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]