Heritage Inventory
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Heritage Inventory Midland Redevelopment Area July 2016 Page 1 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory DOCUMENT CONTROL ADOPTION DATE: 14 July 2016 AMENDMENT NO. ADOPTION DATE DESCRIPTION {YEAR} {DESCRIPTION} {YEAR} {DESCRIPTION} Page 2 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory Midland Heritage Inventory 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. MANAGEMENT OF PLACES IN THE HERITAGE INVENTORY 7 3. THEMATIC HISTORY OF MIDLAND REDEVELOPMENT AREA 10 4. VICTORIA PRECINCT 21 5. LIST OF PLACES IN THE VICTORIA PRECINCT 25 6. HELENA PRECINCT 83 7. LIST OF PLACES IN THE HELENA PRECINCT 87 8. CLAYTON PRECINCT 149 9. LIST OF PLACES IN THE CLAYTON PRECINCT 153 Page 3 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory 1. Introduction THE INVENTORY The Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority (the Authority) is responsible for the urban renewal of the Midland Redevelopment Area (which includes the Helena, Clayton and Victoria Precincts – the study area) and proposes to recognise and afford protective measures to those places that have cultural heritage significance. The Midland Redevelopment Scheme 2 (the Scheme) empowers the Authority to compile and maintain a list of Heritage Places, called a Heritage Inventory (HI). The Midland HI has been developed in accordance with the provisions of the Heritage of Western Australia Act 1990, which requires all Local Governments to compile an inventory of heritage places as the foundation of sound local heritage planning. As a State government agency, the Authority acknowledges its role and responsibilities in “recognising, promoting and protecting” the cultural heritage that falls under its jurisdiction, as articulated in the State Cultural Heritage Policy. The Midland HI comprises a list of heritage places that are of cultural heritage significance to both local and State communities. The places listed in the HI are supported by a ‘thematic history’, which identifies the history, stories and events that have shaped Midland and are represented in the built environment. The thematic history is important as it informs the assessment of significance of the places. The Midland Redevelopment Area is architecturally and historically rich in significant industrial and commercial places as well as cultural institutions and residential development that reflect the local historical timeline. A key objective of the HI is to recognise and protect such cultural heritage, from iconic sites such as the State Heritage Listed former Midland Railway Workshops and the historical civic and retail “junction” of the town centre to other less recognised but important historical elements of Midland. Page 4 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory STUDY AREA The study area comprises the land within the Midland Redevelopment Area, as shown on the Midland Redevelopment Scheme 2 Map: MORRISON RD Y N HW EASTER GREAT Victoria Precinct LLOYD ST VICTORIA ST Helena Precinct Clayton Precinct MILITARY RD MILITARY N Victoria Precinct 100 0 300 Helena Precinct METRES Clayton Precinct Reserved for Future Rail or Road Primary Regional Road Reserved for Public Purpose FIGURE 1 : MIDLAND REDEVELOPMENT AREA Page 5 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory METHODOLOGY The methodology adopted for preparation of this Heritage Inventory (HI) is based on the methodology set out in the State Heritage Office’s Basic Principles for Local Government Inventories (2012) and the Criteria for the Assessment of Local Heritage Places and Areas (2012). These guidelines have been adapted to ensure that this study is consistent with the Authority’s planning framework. The essential principles and philosophy of the Australian ICOMOS Burra Charter (2013) are also drawn upon in the determination of heritage values and management levels. The preparation process involved an examination of existing and previous inventories prepared by the City of Swan (1997, 2010), as well as other significant reports such as the ‘Midland Central Redevelopment Area Heritage Strategy’ (prepared for Midland Redevelopment Authority 2001, Heritage and Conservation Professionals), ‘Midland Junction Conservation Plan; a legacy of forgotten assets’ (prepared for Shire of Swan, 1998, Hocking Planning and Architecture et al.) and relevant Conservation Plans for individual places within the study area. A desktop search of HCWA’s InHerit database was also undertaken. In accordance with the standard methodology for the preparation of HIs, physical surveys of places within the study area were conducted from the street only and did not include examinations of interior spaces. However, this study was enriched by the extensive physical evidence contained in the previous work, which included written accounts of the internal and external physical surveys that had been undertaken by qualified heritage professionals and detailed documentary evidence prepared by specialist historians. Page 6 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory 2. Management of Places in the Heritage Inventory MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES The following terms are used to classify and describe each place listed in the heritage inventory to enable appropriate management of the place, with details included in the Place Record for each listed place: Statement of Significance Each place includes a Statement of Significance which is a specific and unique description of the key heritage qualities of each place. A site or place is deemed to have heritage significance if it meets one or more of the following criteria: • Aesthetic Value: It is significant in exhibiting particular aesthetic characteristics. For example, it exhibits characteristics of scale, composition, materials, texture and colour that are considered to have value for the local area. • Historic Value: It is significanct in the evolution or pattern of the history of the local district. For example. it is closely associated with the events, developments or cultural phases that have played an important part in the area’s history, has a special association with a group or organisation important in shaping the area or is an example of technical or creative achievement from a particular period. • Scientific (Research) Value: It has demonstrable potential to yielf information that will contribute to an understanding of the natural or cultural history of the local district, or it is significant in demonstrating a high degree of technical innovation or achievement. For example, it is a standing structure or archaelogical deposit which is an important benchmark or reference site, or it shows qualities of innvoation, design skill or originality for its time or context. • Social Value: It is significant through association with a community or cultural group in the local district for social, cultural, educational or spiritual reasons. For example, the place is one that the community, or a significant part of the community, has held in high regard for an extended period. Desirable Outcome The Desirable Outcome relates to how a heritage place should be managed with regard to any future development of the place. Page 7 // MRA Midland Heritage Inventory Management Level The Management Level for a place is related to its heritage value and will have significant influence on how the development of a place is to be managed (i.e. its ‘desired outcome’). The Management Level is as important as the list of places itself to ensure appropriate future management of all places listed on the HI. The Management Levels are outlined in the following table: Management Level Description Desired Outcome These places are included in the State Register of Heritage Places and will be afforded the highest Level 1 Place of State Significance level of protection both through the provisions of the Heritage Act and the Redevelopment Scheme and Heritage Places Development Policy. These places are of local significance in their own right and will be afforded a high level of protection through Level 2 Place of Local Significance the provisions of the Redevelopment Scheme and Heritage Places Development Policy. Conservation of these places is highly desirable through adaptive reuse, however proposed partial or full demolition is to be assessed on a case by case basis at the Development Application stage in accordance with the Redevelopment Scheme and Level 3 Place of Lesser Significance Heritage Places Development Policy, including a full heritage assessment and impact statement. Photographic records and interpretation should be included in any redevelopment of the site. These places are historic sites with few or no built features and should be retained as a record in the Level 4 Historic Site Inventory for archival purposes. Their significance should be recognised through interpretation in any redevelopment of the site. Table 1 - Management Levels for Heritage PlacesPlanning Implications PLANNING IMPLICATIONS The HI has a key role to play in the protection and conservation of local and State heritage. This document is adopted by the Authority under the provisions of the Scheme and forms part of the statutory planning framework for the Midland Redevelopment Area. The HI should be read in conjunction with the Scheme, the Authority’s Development Policy for Heritage Places, and the Design Guidelines, and will be used in assessment of development applications and planning decision making regarding heritage places in the Midland Redevelopment Area. Ultimately, the relevant local government authority may include the information provided in this inventory as a supplementary list to their existing heritage inventory or statutory scheme list. They may also develop further policies, which encourage the