DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds: an Introduction to North American Grasslands and the Practices Used to Manage Grasslands and Grassland Birds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds: an Introduction to North American Grasslands and the Practices Used to Manage Grasslands and Grassland Birds University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Ornithology Papers in the Biological Sciences 2019 The Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds: An Introduction to North American Grasslands and the Practices Used to Manage Grasslands and Grassland Birds Jill A. Shaffer Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] John P. DeLong University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology Part of the Ornithology Commons, Population Biology Commons, Poultry or Avian Science Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Shaffer, Jill A. and DeLong, John P., "The Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds: An Introduction to North American Grasslands and the Practices Used to Manage Grasslands and Grassland Birds" (2019). Papers in Ornithology. 97. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology/97 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Ornithology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds—An Introduction to North American Grasslands and the Practices Used to Manage Grasslands and Grassland Birds Chapter A of The Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds Professional Paper 1842–A U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A E B F C G D H Cover. A, Upland Sandpiper, by Rick Bohn, used with permission. B, Burrowing Owl, by David O. Lambeth, used with permission. C, Greater Sage-Grouse, by Tom Koerner, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. D, Baird’s Sparrow, by Rick Bohn, used with permission. E, Chestnut-collared Longspur, by Rick Bohn, used with permission. F, Cattle grazing in McPherson County, South Dakota, by Lawrence D. Igl, U.S. Geological Survey. G, Hay baling and raking, by Rick Bohn, used with permission. H, Prescribed burn, by Jennifer Jewett, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Background photograph: Northern mixed-grass prairie in North Dakota, by Rick Bohn, used with permission. The Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds—An Introduction to North American Grasslands and the Practices Used to Manage Grasslands and Grassland Birds By Jill A. Shaffer1 and John P. DeLong1,2 Chapter A of The Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds Edited by Douglas H. Johnson,1 Lawrence D. Igl,1 Jill A. Shaffer,1 and John P. DeLong1,2 1U.S. Geological Survey. 2University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Professional Paper 1842–A U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Shaffer, J.A., and DeLong, J.P., 2019, The effects of management practices on grassland birds—An introduction to North American grasslands and the practices used to manage grasslands and grassland birds, chap. A of Johnson, D.H., Igl, L.D., Shaffer, J.A., and DeLong, J.P., eds., The effects of management practices on grassland birds: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1842, 63 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1842A. ISSN 2330-7102 (online) iii Contents Acknowledgments .........................................................................................................................................v North American Grassland and Wetland Habitats ...................................................................................1 Characteristics of the North American Great Plains ......................................................................1 Major Ecological Forces in the Great Plains prior to European Settlement ...............................5 North American Grassland and Wetland Habitats after European Settlement ..................................7 Anthropogenic Changes to the Major Ecological Forces of Grazing and Burning ....................7 Factors Contributing to the Loss and Degradation of Grassland and Wetland Habitats ........10 Conservation of Grassland and Wetland Habitats ........................................................................15 North American Sagebrush Habitats Before and After European Settlement .................................18 Grassland Birds ............................................................................................................................................19 Use of Human-Created Grassland Habitats by Grassland Birds ................................................20 Use of Agricultural Lands by Grassland Birds ...............................................................................23 Maintaining and Managing Grasslands for Grassland Birds ...............................................................25 Factors to Consider when Choosing a Management Approach .................................................26 Restoration ...........................................................................................................................................28 Management Tools for Grasslands ..................................................................................................29 Seasonality, Intensity, and Frequency ....................................................................................30 Burning, Grazing, and Mowing ................................................................................................32 Other Management Concerns ..........................................................................................................35 Considerations in Grassland Reserve Design ................................................................................38 Predators and Brood Parasites ...............................................................................................40 Final Thoughts ..............................................................................................................................................41 Summary........................................................................................................................................................41 References ....................................................................................................................................................42 Figure A1. Map showing distribution of major grassland ecosystems in North America prior to European settlement ....................................................................................................................2 iv Conversion Factors U.S. customary units to International System of Units Multiply By To obtain Length mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) International System of Units to U.S. customary units Multiply By To obtain Length centimeter (cm) 0.3937 inch (in.) meter (m) 3.281 foot (ft) kilometer (km) 0.6214 mile (mi) Area hectare (ha) 2.471 acre square kilometer (km2) 247.1 acre hectare (ha) 0.003861 square mile (mi2) square kilometer (km2) 0.3861 square mile (mi2) Mass kilogram (kg) 2.205 pound (lb) Temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) may be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (°F) as °F = (1.8 × °C) + 32. Abbreviations CRP Conservation Reserve Program DNC dense nesting cover FWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service NGO non-governmental organization PCP Permanent Cover Program spp. species (applies to two or more species within the genus) ssp. subspecies USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture WPA Waterfowl Production Area v Acknowledgments Major funding for this effort was provided by the Prairie Pothole Joint Venture, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. Geological Survey. Additional funding was provided by the U.S. Forest Service, the Nature Conservancy, and the Plains and Prairie Potholes Landscape Conser- vation Cooperative. We thank Peter D. Vickery for permission to use the illustration in figure 1. We thank Rachel M. Bush, Shay F. Erickson, Emily C. McLean, and Susana Rios for their assis- tance with various aspects of this effort. Lynn M. Hill and Keith J. Van Cleave, U.S. Geological Survey, acquired many publications for us throughout this effort, including some that were very old and obscure. We thank David D. Dewald, Edward S. DeKeyser, Steve R. Dyke, Kevin Kading, Jeffrey L. Printz, Christine A. Ribic, Mary M. Rowland, Karen A. Smith, and Marsha A. Sovada for information they provided. Earlier versions of this account benefitted from insightful com- ments from Deborah A. Buhl, Neal D. Niemuth, and Brian A. Tangen. Northern mixed-grass prairie. Photograph by Rick Bohn, used with permission. The Effects of Management Practices on Grassland Birds—An Introduction to North American Grasslands and the Practices Used to Manage Grasslands and Grassland Birds By Jill A. Shaffer1 and John
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Partners in Flight Landbird Conservation Plan 2016
    PARTNERS IN FLIGHT LANDBIRD CONSERVATION PLAN 2016 Revision for Canada and Continental United States FOREWORD: A NEW CALL TO ACTION PROJECT LEADS Kenneth V. Rosenberg, Cornell Lab of Ornithology Judith A. Kennedy, Environment and Climate Change Canada The Partners in Flight (PIF) 2016 Landbird Conservation Plan Revision comes Randy Dettmers, United States Fish and Wildlife Service at an important time in conserving our heritage of an abundant and diverse Robert P. Ford, United States Fish and Wildlife Service avifauna. There is now an urgent need to bridge the gap between bird Debra Reynolds, United States Fish and Wildlife Service conservation planning and implementation. AUTHORS John D. Alexander, Klamath Bird Observatory Birds and their habitats face unprecedented threats from climate change, Carol J. Beardmore, Sonoran Joint Venture; United States Fish and Wildlife Service poorly planned urban growth, unsustainable agriculture and forestry, and Peter J. Blancher, Environment and Climate Change Canada (emeritus) a widespread decline in habitat quantity and quality. The spectacle of bird Roxanne E. Bogart, United States Fish and Wildlife Service migration is being diminished by direct mortality as every year millions Gregory S. Butcher, United States Forest Service of birds die from anthropogenic sources. As documented in this Plan, Alaine F. Camfield, Environment and Climate Change Canada nearly 20% of U.S. and Canadian landbird species are on a path towards Andrew Couturier, Bird Studies Canada endangerment and extinction in the absence of conservation action. Dean W. Demarest, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Randy Dettmers, United States Fish and Wildlife Service We know, however, that when we use the best science to develop Wendy E.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • L O U I S I a N A
    L O U I S I A N A SPARROWS L O U I S I A N A SPARROWS Written by Bill Fontenot and Richard DeMay Photography by Greg Lavaty and Richard DeMay Designed and Illustrated by Diane K. Baker What is a Sparrow? Generally, sparrows are characterized as New World sparrows belong to the bird small, gray or brown-streaked, conical-billed family Emberizidae. Here in North America, birds that live on or near the ground. The sparrows are divided into 13 genera, which also cryptic blend of gray, white, black, and brown includes the towhees (genus Pipilo), longspurs hues which comprise a typical sparrow’s color (genus Calcarius), juncos (genus Junco), and pattern is the result of tens of thousands of Lark Bunting (genus Calamospiza) – all of sparrow generations living in grassland and which are technically sparrows. Emberizidae is brushland habitats. The triangular or cone- a large family, containing well over 300 species shaped bills inherent to most all sparrow species are perfectly adapted for a life of granivory – of crushing and husking seeds. “Of Louisiana’s 33 recorded sparrows, Sparrows possess well-developed claws on their toes, the evolutionary result of so much time spent on the ground, scratching for seeds only seven species breed here...” through leaf litter and other duff. Additionally, worldwide, 50 of which occur in the United most species incorporate a substantial amount States on a regular basis, and 33 of which have of insect, spider, snail, and other invertebrate been recorded for Louisiana. food items into their diets, especially during Of Louisiana’s 33 recorded sparrows, Opposite page: Bachman Sparrow the spring and summer months.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccown's Longspur (Rhynchophanes Mccownii)
    McCown’s Longspur (Rhynchophanes mccownii ) A Species Conservation Assessment for The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project Prepared by Melissa J. Panella Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Wildlife Division November 2012 The mission of the Nebraska Natural Legacy Project is to implement a blueprint for conserving Nebraska’s flora, fauna and natural habitats through the proactive, voluntary conservation actions of partners, communities and individuals. Purpose The primary goal in development of at-risk species conservation assessments is to compile biological and ecological information that may assist conservation practitioners in making decisions regarding the conservation of species of interest. The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project recognizes the McCown’s Longspur ( Rhynchophanes mccownii ) as a Tier I at- risk species. Some general management recommendations are made here regarding the McCown’s Longspur (MCLO); however, conservation practitioners will need to use professional judgment to make specific management decisions based on objectives, location, and a multitude of variables. This resource was designed to share available knowledge of MCLO that will aid in the decision-making process or in identifying research needs for the benefit of the species. Species conservation assessments should not be stagnant documents but rather will need to be updated as new scientific information becomes available. The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project focuses efforts in the state’s Biologically Unique Landscapes (BULs), but it is recommended that whenever
    [Show full text]
  • Chestnut-Collared Longspur (Calcarius Ornatus)
    Guide to Managing for Optimal Habitat Attributes: Chestnut-Collared Longspur (Calcarius ornatus) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This guide was developed by Sue Michalsky, Brenda Dale and Heather Peat Hamm, with technical and editorial input from Stephen Davis and Nicola Koper. The authors would also like to thank the assistance of Sarah Ludlow, Dorothy Hill, Barbara Bleho, Ryan Dudragne, Carolyn Gaudet, Orin Balas, Rebecca Magnus and Diego Steinaker, who provided useful comments that greatly improved the manuscript. The project was financially supported by the Department of the Environment of the Government of Canada (Environment and Climate Change Canada), through the Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP) funding granted to the Saskatchewan Prairie Conservation Action Plan (PCAP). Ce projet a été réalisé avec l’appui financier du gouvernement du Canada agissant par l’entremise du ministère fédéral de l’Environnement (Environnement et Changement climatique Canada). Thank you also to all the PCAP Partners and other organizations who provided support for this project: Paskwa Consultants Inc., Nature Saskatchewan, Nature Conservancy of Canada, Parks Canada, Ranchers Stewardship Alliance Inc., SaskPower, Saskatchewan Stock Growers Association, Saskatchewan Cattlemen's Association, Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment, Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture, and Simply Ag Solutions. Many sources of information were used in compiling this document including expert opinions and both published and unpublished literature. References used in compiling this review
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Activities of the Lapland Longspur on Baffin Island
    SUMMER ACTIVITIES OF THE LAPLAND LONGSPUR ON BAFFIN ISLAND BY GEORGE M. SUTTON AND DAVID F. PARMELEE ROM June 14 to August 22, 1953, we studied the birds of southern Baffin F Island, while living at the Royal Canadian Air Force Base near the head of Frobisher Bay. Among the buildings the Lapland Longspur (CaZcarius lap- ponicus) was the most noticeable, if not actually the commonest, bird. With the Snow Bunting (Plectrophenax nivalis) , Horned Lark (Eremophila al- pestris) , Water-Pipit (Anthus spinoletta) , and Semipalmated Plover (Chara- drius semipalmatus) , it was in evidence most of the time, both day and night, in the latter half of June and early July. The longspur inhabited all wet grasslands of the vicinity, notably those of the extensive flats just north of the Base, and of Davidson Point, a mile or so west of the Base, near the mouth of the Sylvia Grinnell River (Fig. 1) . Not all longspur-inhabited meadows were low, extensive and level, however. Slop ing ones, of varying size and shape, but often only two or three rods wide, bordered tiny snow-fed streams among the foothills. More level ones, of greater elevation, occupied depressions on the hilltops or formed the margins of lakes. The commonest bird of rocky country and therefore of the region as a whole was, of course, the Snow Bunting; but wherever there was a wet, grassy meadow the longspur was apt to be. Wynne-Edwards (1952:385), who considered the longspur the commonest bird of the low ground at the head of Clyde Inlet, Baffin Island, in the summer of 1950, found it reaching a “density of one pair in 5-15 acres (2-6 ha.) ” in the most suitable habitats -i.e., the “wet tussocky meadows.” Soper (1940:14) mentions the grass tundras’ being “particularly rich in nesting Lapland Longspurs .
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Birds: Volume 4 – Sparrows, Weaver Finches and Longspurs © 2013, Edges, Fence Rows, Thickets and Grain Fields
    ILLINOIS BIRDS : Volume 4 SPARROWS, WEAVER FINCHES and LONGSPURS male Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder female Photo © John Cassady Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Mary Kay Rubey Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder American tree sparrow chipping sparrow field sparrow vesper sparrow eastern towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Spizella arborea Spizella passerina Spizella pusilla Pooecetes gramineus Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder lark sparrow savannah sparrow grasshopper sparrow Henslow’s sparrow fox sparrow song sparrow Chondestes grammacus Passerculus sandwichensis Ammodramus savannarum Ammodramus henslowii Passerella iliaca Melospiza melodia Photo © Brian Tang Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Lincoln’s sparrow swamp sparrow white-throated sparrow white-crowned sparrow dark-eyed junco Le Conte’s sparrow Melospiza lincolnii Melospiza georgiana Zonotrichia albicollis Zonotrichia leucophrys Junco hyemalis Ammodramus leconteii Photo © Brian Tang winter Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder summer Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Photo © Mark Bowman winter Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder summer Photo © Rob Curtis, The Early Birder Nelson’s sparrow
    [Show full text]
  • Smith's Longspur: a Case of Neglect by Alan 1
    2 Smith's Longspur: A Case of Neglect by Alan 1. Ryff On 29 September 1985 at longspur to lack the descriptive Chippewa Park in Thunder Bay, subsection "Plumages." Just Thunder Bay District, Mike fragments of Oberholser's (1974) Matheson and Alan Wormington description match the field notes flushed a peculiar looking taken on the bird at Thunder Bay. longspur whose tail flashed with Thus I had to seek information extra white. Wormington sub­ elsewhere. I studied the 62 sequently showed this bird to Nick specimens of Smith's Longspur at Escott and me. It proved to be a the University ofMichigan Smith's Longspur (Calcarius pictus). Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor We observed it for over an hour at (hereafter UMMZ). Because four distances of 1-6 m. Since the of the specimens are juveniles, I streaks on its breast were more began to see the misleading conspicuous than the streaks of the aspects of certain field guides. Smith's Longspurs illustrated in Each juvenile was collected at the National Geographic Society Churchill, Manitoba: #83995, a (hereafter NGS) guide (1983), we male, on 5 August 1936; #83996, a I believed that this bird was an male, on 5 August 1936; #166586, a !' immature. But were we correct? female, on 28 July 1938; and This became a difficult question to #217737, a female labelled 22 days answer. old, on 24 July 1966. Frank M. Chapman had less In addition to specimens and available information than his publications, I used my field notes, counterparts of today. In 1911, he which Escott, Matheson, and I concluded that figure 6 of a Wormington verified at the time of I~ Fuertes' painting originally observation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chestnut-Collared Longspur (Calcarius Ornatus): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Chestnut-collared Longspur (Calcarius ornatus): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project December 13, 2004 James A. Sedgwick Ecosphere Environmental Services 2257 Main Avenue Durango, CO 81301 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Sedgwick, J.A. (2004, December 13). Chestnut-collared Longspur (Calcarius ornatus): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/chestnutcollaredlongspur.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank Ecosphere Environmental Services for the opportunity to participate in the USDA Forest Service Species Conservation Project. I thank especially Mike Fitzgerald and Lynn Alterman for technical assistance and constructive comments on the manuscript. Numerous private organizations, federal agencies, and biologists volunteered their time and shared their unpublished data. AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY James A. Sedgwick received his M.A. in zoology from the University of Montana for a comparative study of the breeding ecology of Hammond’s and Dusky flycatchers and his Ph.D. in wildlife biology from Colorado State University. His dissertation research was on avian habitat relationships in a pinyon-juniper woodland. Currently a Research Biologist for the U.S. Geological Survey, he has continued studies of Empidonax flycatchers, with emphasis on geographic variation in song, lifetime reproductive success, population dynamics, and site and mate fidelity. His other research has included studies of avian response to grazing, habitat relationships of cavity-nesting birds, and phytosociology and demography of cottonwoods. Current address: USGS, Fort Collins Science Center, 2150 Centre Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80525-8118.
    [Show full text]
  • UGRD 2013 Spring Rach David
    Morphological characteristics follow the mtDNA sequence of evolutionary descent within the family Calcariidae. By David Rach with Eric C. Atkinson So what is a Calcariidae??? Calcariidae • Family of sexually dimorphic, sparrow-like passerines that inhabit shrub steppe habitats of North America Calcariidae • Family of sexually dimorphic, sparrow-like passerines that inhabit shrub steppe habitats of North America • Arose 4.2-6.5 mya during a Miocene period of accelerated drying and cooling. • 6 Species, 4 of which are found in Wyoming In Wyoming during the Summer Chestnut-collared Longspur (Calcarius ornatus) CCLO McCown’s Longspur (Rynchophanes mccownii) MCLO In Wyoming during the Winter Snow Bunting (Plectrophenax nivalis) SNBU Lapland Longspur (Calcarius lapponicus) LALO Not found in Wyoming Smith’s Longspur (Calcarius pictus) SMLO McKay’s Bunting Plectrophenax hyperboreus MKBU McCown’s Longspur Female Male Previously Believed Calcariidae Longspurs Buntings CCLO SMLO MCLO LALO SNBU MKBU Currently Believed Calcariidae Calcarius Rynchophanes Plectrophenax CCLO SMLO LALO MCLO SNBU MKBU Purpose of Study: • Avian Taxonomy • Does the Morphology follow the DNA? • Trait that distinguishes between the two sub-clades? Identifying and Cataloging Museum Specimens Methods Measurements • Wing Chord (natural) • Tail Length • Tarsus (Leg) Length • Hallux (Toe Nail) Length Measurements • Exposed Culmen • Bill Length • Bill Depth • Bill Width Statistics: • Principal Component Analysis (PCA) • Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) • Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Species Within the CCBNEP Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance
    Current Status and Historical Trends of the Estuarine Living Resources within the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area Volume 4 of 4 Checklist of Species Within the CCBNEP Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program CCBNEP-06D • January 1996 This project has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #CE-9963-01-2 to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. The contents of this document do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, nor do the contents of this document necessarily constitute the views or policy of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Management Conference or its members. The information presented is intended to provide background information, including the professional opinion of the authors, for the Management Conference deliberations while drafting official policy in the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). The mention of trade names or commercial products does not in any way constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. Volume 4 Checklist of Species within Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance John W. Tunnell, Jr. and Sandra A. Alvarado, Editors Center for Coastal Studies Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Dr. Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 Current Status and Historical Trends of Estuarine Living Resources of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area January 1996 Policy Committee Commissioner John Baker Ms. Jane Saginaw Policy Committee Chair Policy Committee Vice-Chair Texas Natural Resource Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6 Conservation Commission Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Great Plains Business Plan
    National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Business Plan for the Northern Great Plains September 2016 Purpose of a Business Plan The purpose of a NFWF business plan is to provide a concise blueprint of the strategies and resources required to achieve the desired conservation outcomes. The strategies discussed in this plan do not represent solely the foundation’s view of the actions necessary to achieve the identified conservation goals, but instead reflect the majority view of the many federal, state, academic, and organizational experts that consulted during plan development. This plan is not meant to duplicate ongoing efforts but rather to invest in areas where gaps might exist so as to support the efforts of the larger conservation community. Acknowledgements Numerous organizations, agencies and funding partners provided invaluable insight and feedback in the development of this plan. Special thanks to: The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bureau of Land Management, Margret A. Cargill Foundation, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, World Wildlife Fund, Bird Conservancy of the Rockies, and the Northern Great Plains Joint Venture. About NFWF The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation protects and restores our nation's wildlife and habitats. Chartered by Congress in 1984, NFWF directs public conservation dollars to the most pressing environmental needs and matches those investments with private contributions. NFWF works with government, nonprofit and corporate partners to find solutions for the most complex conservation challenges. Over the last three decades, NFWF has funded more than 4,000 organizations and committed more than $2.9 billion to conservation projects.
    [Show full text]