Green River and Flaming Gorge Reservoir Post Impoundment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Green River and Flaming Gorge Reservoir Post Impoundment Green River and Flaming Gorge Reservoir Post Impoundment Investigations 1967 Addendum Progress Report No. 4, Job No. 1 B Fishery Investigations, Flaming Gorge Unit Section 8 Progress, Flaming Gorge Unit Colorado River Storage Project Fishery Survey of Fontenelle Reservoir • and the Green River Downstream to Flaming Gorge Reservoir „Wyoming Game and Fish Commission - James B. White, TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 4 Methods 6 Results, Fontenelle Reservoir 9 Chemical and Physical 9 Temperature 9 Dissolved Oxygen 9 Alkalinity 10 Hydrogen Ion 11 Total Hardness 11 Turbidity 12 Electrical Conductivity 12 Bottom Fauna 12 Plankton 1 3 Fishery 15 Composition, Abundance, and Distribution 15 Rainbow Trout 16 Brown Trout 17 Whitefish 18 Flannelmouth Sucker 19 Carp 20 Bonytail Chub 20 Utah Chub 21 Bluehead Sucker 21 Forage Fish 21 Harvest 21 Food Habits 21 Results, Green River Section I 24 Chemical and Physical 24 Turbidity 25 Hardness 25 Bicarbonate 25 Sulfate 25 Chloride 26 Electrical Conductivity 26 Hydrogen Ion 26 Temperature 27 Bottom Fauna 27 Fishery 28 Section II Chemical and Physical 29 Turbidity 31 Hardness 31 Bicarbonate 31 Sulfate 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS cont'd: Section II Chloride 32 Electrical Conductivity 32 Hydrogen Ion 32 Temperature 32 Bottom Fauna 32 Fishery 33 Composition, Abundance and Distribution 34 Length, Weight and Condition 34 Food Habits 37 Age Composition 38 Section III, Fontenelle Reservoir Chemical and Physical 39 Turbidity 41 Hardness 41 Bicarbonate 41 Sulfate 42 Chloride 42 Electrical Conductivity 42 Hydrogen Ion 42 Temperature 43 Bottom Fauna 43 Fishery 44 Composition, Abundance and Distribution 44 Length, Weight and Condition 45 Food Habits 46 Age Composition 46 Section IV Chemical and Physical 49 Bottom Fauna 51 Fishery 52 Exploitation of the Green River Fishery 52 Trout Movement 54 Spawning 55 Discussion 55 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Summary of Trout Stocking in the Green River and Fontenelle Reservoir, 1963 - 1966 ................ 5 2. Food Habits of 50 Rainbow Trout and 20 Brown Trout from Fontenelle Reservoir, 1965 and 1966 ............. 23 3. Bitter Creek Water Composition on March 21, 1966, during the Lowland Runoff (in ppm) ............. 24 4. Alkali Creek Chemical Composition ........... 29 5. Chemical Composition of the Big Sandy River.......... 30 21, 1966, 6. Chemical Composition of Dry Creek on March ........... (in ppm) 30 (K) 7. Mean Length, Weight and Condition Data for Fish...... in Section II 35 8. Food Items of 51 Rainbow Trout Stomachs from Section II, Green River, 1965 - 1966 (all sizes combined). — 36 9. Average Lengths for Each Rainbow Trout Age Class in Section II ... 38 10. Water Chemistry of Slate Creek (in ppm) ... 39 11. Water Chemistry (in ppm) and Physical Data for East Side Flume Creek and the Green River upstream from the Mouth of Flume Creek ... 40 12. Average, Length, Weight and Condition of Fish in Section III during Fiscal Years 1966 and 1967 ... 47 13. Food Items of 32 Rainbow Trout Stomachs from Section III, Green River, 1965 - 1966 ......................... 48 14. Average Lengths for Each Rainbow Trout Age Class in Section III....... 49 15. Mean and Extreme Values (ppm) of Green River Water Chemistry, Section IV, (Names Hill Only), 1965 - 1967 50 16. Green River Creel Census Summary, 1966 ... 60 17. Aerial Fishermen Counts on the Green River from Flaming Gorge Reservoir to Fontenelle Reservoir during June, July, August and September, 1966 ... 61 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Map of the Green River Study Area Showing Sections and Locations of Benthic Sample Stations ... 62 2. Monthly Surface Area at Fontenelle Reservoir from July, 1965 to July, 1967 ... 63 3. Mean Weekly Discharge of the Green River at the Fontenelle Dam Gage from July, 1965 to September, 1966 .... 64 4. Map of Fontenelle Reservoir Showing Maximum (B) and Minimum (A) Water Levels .... 65 5. Fontenelle Reservoir Water Chemistry as Related to Depth in August, 1965 .... 66 6. Seasonal Fluctuations in Fontenelle Reservoir Water Chemistry from August, 1965 through May, 1967 .... 67 7. Plankton Abundance in the Surface to Ten Foot Strata of Fontenelle Reservoir from August, 1965 to May, 1967 .............................................. 68 8. Vertical Distribution of Plankton in Fontenelle Reservoir in August, 1965 and 1966 ................ 69 9. Composition of the Fontenelle Reservoir Fish Popula- tion as Indicated by Gill Net Catches in the Fiscal Years 1966 and 1967. (July 1 to June 30) .......... 70 10. Length Frequency of Rainbow Trout in Fontenelle Reservoir as Indicated by Gill Net Catches in Fiscal Years 1966 and 1967 (July 1 to June 30) 71 11. Mean Lenghts attained at Various Ages by Rainbow and Brown Trout in Fontenelle Reservoir. Age as determined from Scales and Otholiths taken from Gill Net Caught Trout .... 72 12. Number and Volume of Organisms in Square Foot Bottom Samples taken at Station 1 from October, 1965 through April, 1967 ....73 13. Composition of Square Foot Bottom Samples taken at Station 1 from October, 1965 through April, 1967... 74 14. Number and Volume of Benthic Organisms in Square Foot Samples Taken at Station II from October, 1965.... through April, 1967 75 List of Figures cont i d: Page 15. Composition of Square Foot Bottom Samples taken at Station II from October, 1965 through April, .... 1967 76 16. Composition of the Fish Population Section II of the Green River as indicated by sampling during the Fiscal Years 1966 and 1967 (July 1 to June 30). 77 17. Number and Volume of Benthic Organisms in Square Foot Samples taken at Station III from October, ........ 1965 through April, 1967 78 18. Composition of Square Foot Bottom Samples taken at Station III from October, 1965 through April, 1967 .....79 19. Composition of the Fish Population Section III of the Green River as indicated by Samples during Fiscal Years 1966 and 1967. (July 1 to June 30 .... 80 20. Number and Volume of Benthic Organisms in Square Foot Samples taken in Section IV from September, 1965 through April, 1967 ........81 91. Composition of Square Foot Samples taken at Station IV from September,1965 through April, 1967 .... 82 92. Number and Volume of Benthic Organisms in Square Foot Bottom Samples taken at Station V from August, 1965 through April, 1967 .... 83 23. Composition of Square Foot Bottom Samples taken at Station V from August, 1965 through April, 1967.0 .. 84 24. Dominant Phyto and Zoo-plankters of the Upper 10 Feet of the Pelagic Zone at Fontenelle Reservoir from August 10, 1965 to May, 1967 .... 85 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX PAGE 1 Fontenelle Reservoir Water Chemistry 9A 2 Fontenelle Reservoir Bottom Fauna 12A 3 Fontenelle Reservoir Plankton 13A 4 Fontenelle Reservoir Fish Condition Factors 17A 5 Green River Water Chemistry 24A 6 Invertebrate Samples, Green River Section 11 27A 7 Invertebrate Samples, Green River Section II 32A 8 Invertebrate Samples, Green River Section III 43A 9 Invertebrate Samples, Green River Section IV 51A 10 Invertebrate Samples, New Fork River 51B ABSTRACT The biota, chemistry and physical regimens of Fontenelle Reservoir and the Green River were sampled from 1965 to 1967. Fontenelle Reservoir was found to be a typical, small, western, alkaline reservoir. When full, the reservoir had a chemical stratification, but no thermocline. Bottom waters of the reservoir were nearly anerobic with relatively high carbon dioxide concentrations. Mougeotia and cladocerans were the principal plankters at that time. Tendipedidae was always the principal bottom organism. After the reservoir was reduced to minimum pool in September, 1965, the chemistry was monotonous and homothermal with only seasonal variations in hydrogen ion (near neutral in winter) and carbon dioxide (high in winter). Oxygen, bicarbonate, and total hardness were comparatively stabile seasonally. Diatoms were the dominant phyto-plankters; while, copepods, rotifers and cladocerans were the dominant zoo-plankters at different times. Several species of aquatic plants (Elodea, Potomogeton and Myriophyllum) became well established in the reservoir shoal areas after draw-down. Rainbow and brown trout comprised about 25 percent of the fish fauna in FY 1967. Salmonid numbers appear to be decreasing, while cyprinids and catostomids apparently are increasing. Gill net catch-per-hour rates increased in FY 1967 for rainbow trout, carp, and flannelmouth suckers. Brown trout and whitefish catch rates decreased. Utah and bonytail chubs were rare in gill net catches. Various small cyprinids and immature cat- ostomids (forage fish) were common in the shoal areas. Gill netted rainbow trout were smaller in FY 1967. Length of rainbow trout at year V was 464 mm; length of brown trout at year VII was 510 mm. Excluding organic debris, midge larvae were the principal item found in rainbow trout stomachs, while scuds and fish were most common in brown trout stomachs. -1- Fontenelle Reservoir greatly influenced its tailwater, the Green River, as a barrier to fish migration, as a factor affecting water temperature and as an artificial control of water flow. Flooding, resulting from the 1965 reservoir draw-down, scoured the river and reduced fish stocks. The fish food and plants apparently recovered within a year of the flood. Downstream from the dam, Tendipedidae was the dominant organism in the post-flood period; bottom fauna population peaks occurred in spring and/or fall. Upstream, the benthic fauna peaked in late fall or winter and was dominated by Tendipedidae or Ephemerella. The Green River was found to be more alkaline and mineral laden downstream from the confluence of the Big Sandy River. The river seems to decrease in productivity below Big Island because of possible marginal summer temperatures, less fish food and poorer trout habitat. The relatively cool river water near Fontenelle Dam may be attracting trout since numbers of rainbow trout decreased drastically downstream from the Big Sandy River and flannelmouth suckers were the most abundant species in FY 1967 samples. The suckers decreased in abundance, while the salmonids remained relatively stabile, in the area between the dam and the Big Sandy River.
Recommended publications
  • Colorado River Basin Update
    Colorado River Basin Update Wyoming Water Development Commission and Select Water Committee – Joint Meeting 13 May, 2021 Outline 1. Update on current hydrology 2. Current Topics A. Demand Management ( Wyoming and UCRC efforts) B. Drought Response Operations C. Discussion on Curtailment Procedures i. Discussions with Reclamation on Fontenelle Reservoir D. Discussion on post-2026 river operations E. Lake Powell Pipeline discussions 3. Wrap-Up 4. Q&A Upper Basin Drought Contingency Plan Three Elements A. Augmentation B. Demand Management Storage Agreement C. Drought Response Operations Agreement Demand Management A. Wyoming Discussions (support provided by UW extension) 1. Public meetings held during the fall of 2019 • Heard interest from water users in discussing both demand management and curtailment 2. Worked with key stakeholder group as well as focus groups on specific topics 3. Draft report prepared by UW team; final report out soon • Provides summary of public input and some recommendations on next steps • Will not address ultimate feasibility of Demand Management in Wyoming. More investigation still needed. B. UCRC effort 1. Four UB states & UCRC staff working with team of consultants to determine feasibility (technical, legal, policy and economic issues) 2. To be completed by fall of 2022 Drought Response Operations Navajo Reservoir Flaming Gorge Blue Mesa Reservoir Reservoir Agree on operations to implement under emergency conditions to maintain minimum power pool elevation at Lake Powell. By conserving water (temporarily) in Lake Powell or moving water available from upper CRSP facilities. Lake Powell Drought Response Operations A. Agreement Establishes a process to rely on available water in the CRSPA Initial Units as needed to reduce the risk of Lake Powell dropping below elevation 3,525’.
    [Show full text]
  • January 13, 2021 Executive Director's Report
    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT TO THE COLORADO RIVER BOARD OF CALIFORNIA January 13, 2021 COLORADO RIVER BASIN WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS REPORT As of January 4th, the surface water elevation at Lake Powell was 3,581.80 feet with 10.1 million- acre feet (MAF) of storage, or 42% of capacity. The surface water elevation at Lake Mead was 1,083.89 feet with 10.34 MAF of storage, or 40% of capacity. As of January 3rd, the total system storage was 27.50 MAF, or 46% of capacity, which is about 3.8 MAF less than the total system storage at this same time last year. As of January 6th, the Upper Basin reservoirs, excluding Lake Powell, ranged from 53% of capacity at Fontenelle Reservoir in Wyoming; 84% of capacity at Flaming Gorge Reservoir in Wyoming and Utah; 92% of capacity at Morrow Point, and 48% of capacity at Blue Mesa Reservoir in Colorado; and 63% of capacity at Navajo Reservoir in New Mexico. As of December 16, 2020, the forecasted unregulated inflow into Lake Powell for Water Year (WY) 2021 is 6.23 MAF (58% of normal). The forecasted April through July 2021 runoff into Lake Powell for Water Year-2021 is 4.05 MAF (57% of normal). For WY-2021, the November observed Lake Powell inflow was 0.26 MAF (55% of normal), and the December Lake Powell inflow forecast is 0.21 MAF (58% of normal). To date, WY-2021 precipitation is 65% and the current basin snowpack is 75% of normal. Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Webinar On January 8th, the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center (CBRFC) held a webinar to review the Basin’s current water supply conditions and forecasts.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Outdoor Recreation in Utah 2020 a High-Level Review of the Data & Trends That Define Outdoor Recreation in the State
    the State of outdoor recreation in utah 2020 A high-level review of the data & trends that define outdoor recreation in the state. Jordan W. Smith, Ph.D. & Anna B. Miller, Ph.D. Institute of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, Utah State University about the Institute The Institute of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism (IORT) was founded in 1998 by the Utah State Legisla- ture through the Recreation and Tourism Research and Extension Program Act (S.B. 35). It is mandated to focus on: tourism and outdoor recreation use; the social and economic tradeoffs of tourism and outdoor recreation for local communities; and the relationship between outdoor recreation and tourism and pub- lic land management practices and policies. The purpose of the Institute is to provide: better data for the Legislature and state agencies in their deci- sion-making processes on issues relating to tourism and outdoor recreation; a base of information and expertise to assist community officials as they attempt to balance the economic, social, and environmen- tal tradeoffs in tourism development; and an interdisciplinary approach of research and study on outdoor recreation and tourism, a complex sector of the state’s economy. The Institute is composed of an interdisciplinary team of scientists with backgrounds in the economic, psychological, social, and spatial sciences. It is led by Dr. Jordan W. Smith (Director), Dr. Anna B. Miller (Assistant Director of Research and Operations), and Chase C. Lamborn (Assistant Director of Outreach and Education). The Institute delivers on its mission through a broad network of Faculty Fellows. Jordan W. Smith, Ph.D.1, is the Director of the Institute of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism and an As- sistant Professor in the Department of Environment and Society at Utah State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Operations for Flaming Gorge Dam Water Year 2013
    Annual Report of Operations For Flaming Gorge Dam Water Year 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior January 2015 Bureau of Reclamation Table of Contents Annual Report of Operations for Flaming Gorge Dam ............................................................ 1 Operational Decision Process for Water Year 2013 ................................................................. 2 Step 1: Flow Requests for Research, and Other Federal, State and Stakeholder Input ........ 2 Step 2: Development of Spring Proposal .............................................................................. 4 Step 3: Solicitation of Comments ........................................................................................ 4 Step 4: Final Decision .......................................................................................................... 4 Basin Hydrology and Operations .............................................................................................. 5 Progression of Inflow Forecasts............................................................................................ 5 Summary of Flaming Gorge Operations ............................................................................... 6 Spillway Inspection ............................................................................................................... 8 Flow Objectives Achieved in Water Year 2013 ....................................................................... 8 Spring Flow Objectives......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • September 9, 2020 Executive
    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT TO THE COLORADO RIVER BOARD OF CALIFORNIA September 9, 2020 ADMINISTRATION Meeting Minutes, August 12, 2020 The draft minutes for the August 12, 2020, meeting of the Colorado River Board of California (CRB) have been prepared and were included in the Board meeting packet of materials and are proposed to be adopted at the September 9th, Board meeting. COLORADO RIVER BASIN WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS REPORT As of August 31st, the water level at Lake Powell was 3,599.93 feet with 11.74 million- acre feet (MAF) of storage, or 48% of capacity. The water level at Lake Mead was 1,084.02 feet with 10.35 MAF of storage, or 40% of capacity. As of August 30th, the total system storage was 29.72 MAF, or 50% of capacity, which is about 2.57 MAF less than system storage at this same time last year. As of September 1st, the Upper Basin reservoirs, excluding Lake Powell, ranged from 85% of capacity at Fontenelle Reservoir in Wyoming; 86% of capacity at Flaming Gorge Reservoir in Wyoming and Utah; 96% of capacity at Morrow Point, and 59% of capacity at Blue Mesa Reservoir in Colorado; and 71% of capacity at Navajo Reservoir in New Mexico. As of August 17th, the mid-month forecast for the unregulated inflow into Lake Powell for Water Year (WY) 2020 is 6.18 MAF (57% of normal). The preliminary observed April through July 2020 runoff into Lake Powell for Water Year-2020 was 3.76 MAF (52% of normal). For WY- 2020, the July observed Lake Powell inflow was 0.29 MAF (27% of normal), and the August Lake Powell inflow forecast is 0.1 MAF (19% of normal).
    [Show full text]
  • River Flow Advisory
    River Flow Advisory Bureau . of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah Vol. 15, No. 1 September 1984 River flows in the Upper Colorado River drainage, still high for this time of year, are not expected to decrease much for several weeks: While the daily update of operations and releases has been discontinued, the toll-free numbers now provide updates on Bureau of Reclamation activities and projects. Utah residents may call 1-800-624-1094 and out-of-Utah residents may call 1-800-624-5099. Colorado River at Westwater Canyon The flow of the Colorado River on September 10 was 7, 000 cfs, and is expected to decrease slightly over the next few weeks. Cataract Canyon Includin2 the Green- River The flow was 11,500 cfs on September 10 and will continue to decrease slightly. Lake Powell Lake Powell's elevation on September 10 was 3,699. Assuming normal inflow for this time of year, the lake should continue to go down slowly to elevation 3,682 by next spring. Colorado River through Grand Canyon . Releases through Glen Canyon Dam remain at 25,000 cfs. These releases are expected to be maintained with no daily fluctuations in river flows. Upper Green River - Fontenelle Reservoir Fontenelle Reservoir is now at elevation 6,482 feet. Releases through the dam will be reduced to about 600 cfs starting on September 17 for about 2 weeks during powerplant maintenance. Green River Flows Below Flaming Gorge Dam On September 10 Flaming Gorge Reservoir was at elevation 6,039.9 feet. Releases from the dam are expected to average 2, 500 cfs in September and October with usual daily fluctuations.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper Is/Has Been Under Review for the Journal Biogeosciences (BG)
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Biogeosciences Discuss., 12, 6081–6114, 2015 www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/6081/2015/ doi:10.5194/bgd-12-6081-2015 BGD © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 12, 6081–6114, 2015 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). Dam tailwaters Please refer to the corresponding final paper in BG if available. compound the effects of reservoirs Dam tailwaters compound the effects of A. J. Ulseth and reservoirs on the longitudinal transport of R. O. Hall Jr. organic carbon in an arid river Title Page 1,2,* 2 A. J. Ulseth and R. O. Hall Jr. Abstract Introduction 1Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA Conclusions References 2Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA Tables Figures *now at: École Polytechniqe Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Received: 3 April 2015 – Accepted: 7 April 2015 – Published: 24 April 2015 J I Correspondence to: A. J. Ulseth ([email protected]) J I Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Back Close Full Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 6081 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract BGD Reservoirs on rivers can disrupt organic carbon (OC) transport and transformation, but less is known how downstream river reaches directly below dams contribute to OC pro- 12, 6081–6114, 2015 cessing than reservoirs alone. We compared how reservoirs and their associated tail- 5 waters affected OC quantity and quality by calculating particulate (P) OC and dissolved Dam tailwaters (D) OC fluxes, and measuring composition and bioavailability of DOC.
    [Show full text]
  • Cogjm Usdi New Rel 1969-06-11.Pdf (170.1Kb)
    UNITED STArrES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR * * * * * * * * * * * * * ********news release BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Region 4, Solt Lake City, Utah Telephone: 524-5403 For release: Wednesday, June 11, 1969 BELOW NORMAL APRIL-JULY COLORADO RIVER RUNOFF OF 7.4 Ml LU ON ACRE-FEET FORECAST Moy hos been the third consecutive month of subnormal precipitation in the Colorado River Basin above Lees Ferry, causing the April-July runoff forecast to foll to 7.4 million acre-feet or 87 percent of normal, the Bureau of Reclamation announced today. An even lower runoff forecast is avoided only by the presence of above normal snow accumulations in the high mountains. Another milestone was reached lost month in the uti lization of water of the Colorado River in the Upper Basin . On Thursday night, Moy 29, 1969, water stored in Lake Powell reached elevation 3570 feet, which is "roted head" for the powerplont located at the toe of Glen Canyon Dom . "Roted head" is the lowest level at which water flowing through the turbines con drive the generators at their nameplate capacity. With normal rai nfall, it is expected that Lake Powell 's water surface should reach on all-time high in July at about elevation 3580 feet with a live storage of about 10,290,000 acre-feet. Planned releases from Lake Powell for water year 1969 ore about 8 . 8 million ocre­ feet. For the next 3 years thereafter annual releases should be near this amount in order to deliver Colorado River Compact requirements to the Lower Basin. The entire release wi 11 be used to generate power for power customers in both the Upper and Lower Bosi ns.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2021 Through April 2022
    Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2021 through April 2022 Concurrence by Kathleen Callister, Resources Management Division Manager Kent Kofford, Provo Area Office Manager Nicholas Williams, Upper Colorado Basin Power Manager Approved by Wayne Pullan, Upper Colorado Basin Regional Director U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation • Interior Region 7 Upper Colorado Basin • Power Office Salt Lake City, Utah May 2021 Purpose This Flaming Gorge Operation Plan (FG-Ops) fulfills the 2006 Flaming Gorge Record of Decision (ROD) requirement for May 2021 through April 2022. The FG-Ops also completes the 4-step process outlined in the Flaming Gorge Standard Operation Procedures. The Upper Colorado Basin Power Office (UCPO) operators will fulfil the operation plan and may alter from FG-Ops due to day to day conditions, although we will attempt to stay within the boundaries of the operations defined below. Listed below are proposed operation plans for four different scenarios: moderately dry, average (above median), average (below median), and moderately wet. As of the publishing of this document, the most likely scenario is the moderately dry, however actual operations will vary with hydrologic conditions. The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program), the Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group (FGTWG), Flaming Gorge Working Group (FG WG), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) provided input that was considered in the development of this report. The FG-Ops describes the current hydrologic classification of the Green River Basin and the hydrologic conditions in the Yampa River Basin. The FG-Ops identifies the most likely Reach 2 peak flow magnitude and duration that is to be targeted for the upcoming spring flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Green River Basin Water Planning Process
    FINAL REPORT Green River Basin Water Planning Process February, 2001 Prepared for: Wyoming Water Development Commission Basin Planning Program States West Water Resources Corporation Acknowledgements The States West team would like to acknowledge the assistance of the many individuals, groups, and agencies that contributed to the compilation of this document. At the risk of possible omission, these include: The Green River Basin Advisory Group (facilitated by Mr. Joe Lord) The Wyoming Water Development Office River Basin Planning Staff The Wyoming Water Resources Data System The Wyoming State Engineer’s Office The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality The Wyoming State Geological Survey The University of Wyoming Spatial Data and Visualization Center The Wyoming Game and Fish Department Dr. Larry Pochop, University of Wyoming The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Seedskadee National Wildlife Refuge The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Bridger-Teton, Wasatch-Cache, Ashley, and Medicine Bow National Forests) The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management The U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Wyoming Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources Cover: Millich Ditch, East Fork Smiths Fork Prepared in association with: Boyle Engineering Corporation Purcell Consulting, P.C. Water Right Services, L.L.C. Watts and Associates, Inc. CHAPTER CONTENTS (Individual Chapters have page number listings) ACRONYM LIST I. INTRODUCTION A. Introduction B. Description C. Water-Related History of the Basin D. Wyoming Water Law E. Interstate Compacts II. BASIN WATER USE AND WATER QUALITY PROFILE A. Overview B. Agricultural Water Use C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashley National Forest Visitor's Guide
    shley National Forest VISITOR GUIDE A Includes the Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area Big Fish, Ancient Rocks Sheep Creek Overlook, Flaming Gorge Painter Basin, High Uinta Wilderness he natural forces that formed the Uinta Mountains are evident in the panorama of geologic history found along waterways, roads, and trails of T the Ashley National Forest. The Uinta Mountains, punctuated by the red rocks of Flaming Gorge on the east, offer access to waterways, vast tracts of backcountry, and rugged wilderness. The forest provides healthy habitat for deer, elk, What’s Inside mountain goats, bighorn sheep, and trophy-sized History .......................................... 2 trout. Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area, the High Uintas Wilderness........ 3 Scenic Byways & Backways.. 4 Green River, High Uintas Wilderness, and Sheep Creek Winter Recreation.................... 5 National Geological Area are just some of the popular Flaming Gorge NRA................ 6 Forest Map .................................. 8 attractions. Campgrounds ........................ 10 Cabin/Yurt Rental ............... 11 Activities..................................... 12 Fast Forest Facts Know Before You Go .......... 15 Contact Information ............ 16 Elevation Range: 6,000’-13,528’ Unique Feature: The Uinta Mountains are one of the few major ranges in the contiguous United States with an east-west orientation Fish the lakes and rivers; explore the deep canyons, Annual Precipitation: 15-60” in the mountains; 3-8” in the Uinta Basin high peaks; and marvel at the ancient geology of the Lakes in the Uinta Mountains: Over 800 Ashley National Forest! Acres: 1,382,347 Get to Know Us History The Uinta Mountains were named for early relatives of the Ute Indians. or at least 8,000 years, native peoples have Sapphix and son, Ute, 1869 huntedF animals, gathered plants for food and fiber, photo courtesy of First People and used stone tools, and other resources to make a living.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Water Science Center
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Utah Water Science Center Upper Colorado River Streamflow and Reservoir Contents Provisional Data for: WATER YEAR 2019 All data contained in this report is provisional and subject to revision. Available online at usgs.gov/centers/ut-water PROVISIONAL DATA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUBJECT TO REVISION UTAH WATER SCIENCE CENTER STREAMFLOW AND RESERVOIR CONTENTS IN UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN DAYS IN contact 435-259-4430 or [email protected] MONTH October 2018 31 MONTHLY DISCHARGE (a) MAXIMUM DAILY MINIMUM DAILY (A)MEDIAN PERCENT TOTAL 3 3 3 3 3 STREAM ft /s MEAN ft /s 30 YEAR ft /s ACRE ft /s DATE ft /s DATE (1981-2010) THIS MONTH MEDIAN DAYS FEET COLORADO RIVER NR CISCO, UTAH 4,355 3,202 74% 99,433 196,878 5,090 8-Oct 1,990 1-Oct ADJUSTED (B) 2,638 61% 81,764 162,178 GREEN RIVER AT GREEN RIVER , UT 2,945 2,743 93% 85,031 168,362 3,430 6-Oct 2,030 1-Oct ADJUSTED (C) 1,889 64% 58,564 116,162 SAN JUAN RIVER NEAR BLUFF, UT 1,232 649 53% 20,164 39,924 1,010 7-Oct 429 6-Oct ADJUSTED (D) 391 32% 12,112 24,024 DOLORES RIVER NR CISCO, UTAH 237 123 52% 3,565 7,058 493 8-Oct 22 1-Oct ADJUSTED (E) 141 60% 4,373 8,673 (A) MEDIAN OF MEAN DISCHARGES FOR THE MONTH FOR 30-YR PERIOD 1981-2010 (B) ADJUSTED FOR CHANGE IN STORAGE IN BLUE MESA RESERVOIR.
    [Show full text]