Pharmacokinetics Diuretic
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pitolisant (Wakix) Reference Number: CP.PMN.221 Effective Date: 03.01.20 Last Review Date: 02.21 Line of Business: Commercial, HIM, Medicaid Revision Log
Clinical Policy: Pitolisant (Wakix) Reference Number: CP.PMN.221 Effective Date: 03.01.20 Last Review Date: 02.21 Line of Business: Commercial, HIM, Medicaid Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description ® Wakix (pitolisant) is a selective histamine 3 (H3) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist. FDA Approved Indication(s) Wakix is indicated for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) or cataplexy in adult patients with narcolepsy. Policy/Criteria Provider must submit documentation (such as office chart notes, lab results or other clinical information) supporting that member has met all approval criteria. It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation® that Wakix is medically necessary when the following criteria are met: I. Initial Approval Criteria A. Narcolepsy with Cataplexy (must meet all): 1. Diagnosis of narcolepsy with cataplexy; 2. Prescribed by or in consultation with a neurologist or sleep medicine specialist; 3. Age ≥ 18 years; 4. Failure of 2 of the following antidepressants, each used for ≥ 1 month, unless member’s age is ≥ 65, clinically significant adverse effects are experienced, or all are contraindicated: venlafaxine, fluoxetine, atomoxetine, clomipramine, protriptyline; 5. Dose does not exceed 35.6 mg (two 17.8 mg tablets) per day. Approval duration: Medicaid/HIM – 12 months Commercial – Length of Benefit B. Narcolepsy with Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (must meet all): 1. Diagnosis of narcolepsy with EDS; 2. Prescribed by or in consultation with a neurologist or sleep medicine specialist; 3. Age ≥ 18 years; 4. Failure of a 1-month trial of one of the following central nervous system (CNS) stimulants at up to maximally indicated doses, unless clinically significant adverse effects are experienced or all are contraindicated: amphetamine immediate-release (IR), amphetamine, dextroamphetamine IR, dextroamphetamine, methylphenidate IR; *Prior authorization may be required for CNS stimulants Page 1 of 6 CLINICAL POLICY Pitolisant 5. -
Use of ²-Blockers and Risk of Fractures
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Use of -Blockers and Risk of Fractures Raymond G. Schlienger, PhD, MPH Context Animal studies suggest that the -blocker propranolol increases bone for- Marius E. Kraenzlin, MD mation, but data on whether use of -blockers (with or without concomitant use of thiazide diuretics) is associated with reduced fracture risk in humans are limited. Susan S. Jick, DSc Objective To determine whether use of -blockers alone or in combination with thia- Christoph R. Meier, PhD, MSc zides is associated with a decreased risk of fracture in adults. Design, Setting, and Participants Case-control analysis using the UK General Prac- TUDIES HAVE SUGGESTED THAT tice Research Database (GPRD). The study included 30601 case patients aged 30 to the sympathetic nervous sys- 79 years with an incident fracture diagnosis between 1993 and 1999 and 120819 con- tem has a catabolic effect on trols, matched to cases on age, sex, calendar time, and general practice attended. bones.1-4 In vitro data show that Main Outcome Measures Odds ratios (ORs) of having a fracture in association Sadrenergic agonists stimulate bone re- with use of -blockers or a combination of -blockers with thiazides. sorption in organ culture of mouse cal- Results The most frequent fractures were of the hand/lower arm (n=12837 [42.0%]) variae.4 Chemical sympathectomy with and of the foot (n=4627 [15.1%]). Compared with patients who did not use either guanethidine, a sympathetic neuro- -blockers or thiazide diuretics, the OR for current use of -blockers only (Ն3 pre- toxic agent, impairs bone resorption by scriptions) was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.83); for current use of thia- inhibiting preosteoclast differentiation zides only (Ն3 prescriptions), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.86); and for combined current  and disturbing osteoclast activation in use of -blockers and thiazides, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.79). -
Properties and Units in Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 479–552, 2000. © 2000 IUPAC INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE SCIENTIFIC DIVISION COMMITTEE ON NOMENCLATURE, PROPERTIES, AND UNITS (C-NPU)# and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY CHEMISTRY AND HUMAN HEALTH DIVISION CLINICAL CHEMISTRY SECTION COMMISSION ON NOMENCLATURE, PROPERTIES, AND UNITS (C-NPU)§ PROPERTIES AND UNITS IN THE CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES PART XII. PROPERTIES AND UNITS IN CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (Technical Report) (IFCC–IUPAC 1999) Prepared for publication by HENRIK OLESEN1, DAVID COWAN2, RAFAEL DE LA TORRE3 , IVAN BRUUNSHUUS1, MORTEN ROHDE1, and DESMOND KENNY4 1Office of Laboratory Informatics, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Drug Control Centre, London University, King’s College, London, UK; 3IMIM, Dr. Aiguader 80, Barcelona, Spain; 4Dept. of Clinical Biochemistry, Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland #§The combined Memberships of the Committee and the Commission (C-NPU) during the preparation of this report (1994–1996) were as follows: Chairman: H. Olesen (Denmark, 1989–1995); D. Kenny (Ireland, 1996); Members: X. Fuentes-Arderiu (Spain, 1991–1997); J. G. Hill (Canada, 1987–1997); D. Kenny (Ireland, 1994–1997); H. Olesen (Denmark, 1985–1995); P. L. Storring (UK, 1989–1995); P. Soares de Araujo (Brazil, 1994–1997); R. Dybkær (Denmark, 1996–1997); C. McDonald (USA, 1996–1997). Please forward comments to: H. Olesen, Office of Laboratory Informatics 76-6-1, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), 9 Blegdamsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] Republication or reproduction of this report or its storage and/or dissemination by electronic means is permitted without the need for formal IUPAC permission on condition that an acknowledgment, with full reference to the source, along with use of the copyright symbol ©, the name IUPAC, and the year of publication, are prominently visible. -
Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play
The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Executive Agency for Health and Consumers Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play 24 January 2012 Final Report Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play Acknowledgements Matrix Insight Ltd would like to thank everyone who has contributed to this research. We are especially grateful to the following institutions for their support throughout the study: the Pharmaceutical Group of the European Union (PGEU) including their national member associations in Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Poland and the United Kingdom; the European Medical Association (EMANET); the Observatoire Social Européen (OSE); and The Netherlands Institute for Health Service Research (NIVEL). For questions about the report, please contact Dr Gabriele Birnberg ([email protected] ). Matrix Insight | 24 January 2012 2 Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play Executive Summary This study has been carried out in the context of Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross- border healthcare (CBHC). The CBHC Directive stipulates that the European Commission shall adopt measures to facilitate the recognition of prescriptions issued in another Member State (Article 11). At the time of submission of this report, the European Commission was preparing an impact assessment with regards to these measures, designed to help implement Article 11. -
Comprehensive Screening of Diuretics in Human Urine Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
id5246609 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com AAnnaallyyttiiccaaISllS N : 0974-7419 Volume 13 Issue 7 CCHHEEAnMM IndIIiSaSnT TJoRuRrnYaYl Full Paper ACAIJ, 13(7) 2013 [270-283] Comprehensive screening of diuretics in human urine using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry Shobha Ahi1, Alka Beotra1*, G.B.K.S.Prasad2 1National Dope Testing Laboratory, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi,-110003, (INDIA) 2SOS in Biochemistry, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, (INDIA) E-mail : [email protected] ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Diuretics are drugs that increase the rate of urine flow and sodium excretion Doping, diuretics; to adjust the volume and composition of body fluids. There are several LC-MS/MS; WADA; major categories of this drug class and the compounds vary greatly in Drugs of abuse. structure, physicochemical properties, effects on urinary composition and renal haemodynamics, and site mechanism of action. Diuretics are often abused by athletes to excrete water for rapid weight loss and to mask the presence of other banned substances. Because of their abuse by athletes, ’s (WADA) diuretics have been included in the World Anti-Doping Agency list of prohibited substances. The diuretics are routinely screened by anti- doping laboratories as the use of diuretics is banned both in-competition and out-of-competition. This work provides an improved, fast and selective –tandem mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) method liquid chromatography for the screening of 22 diuretics and probenecid in human urine. The samples preparation was performed by liquid-liquid extraction. The limit of detection (LOD) for all substances was between 10-20 ng/ml or better. -
Histamine Receptors
Tocris Scientific Review Series Tocri-lu-2945 Histamine Receptors Iwan de Esch and Rob Leurs Introduction Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research (LACDR), Division Histamine is one of the aminergic neurotransmitters and plays of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit an important role in the regulation of several (patho)physiological Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The processes. In the mammalian brain histamine is synthesised in Netherlands restricted populations of neurons that are located in the tuberomammillary nucleus of the posterior hypothalamus.1 Dr. Iwan de Esch is an assistant professor and Prof. Rob Leurs is These neurons project diffusely to most cerebral areas and have full professor and head of the Division of Medicinal Chemistry of been implicated in several brain functions (e.g. sleep/ the Leiden/Amsterdam Center of Drug Research (LACDR), VU wakefulness, hormonal secretion, cardiovascular control, University Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Since the seventies, thermoregulation, food intake, and memory formation).2 In histamine receptor research has been one of the traditional peripheral tissues, histamine is stored in mast cells, eosinophils, themes of the division. Molecular understanding of ligand- basophils, enterochromaffin cells and probably also in some receptor interaction is obtained by combining pharmacology specific neurons. Mast cell histamine plays an important role in (signal transduction, proliferation), molecular biology, receptor the pathogenesis of various allergic conditions. After mast cell modelling and the synthesis and identification of new ligands. degranulation, release of histamine leads to various well-known symptoms of allergic conditions in the skin and the airway system. In 1937, Bovet and Staub discovered compounds that antagonise the effect of histamine on these allergic reactions.3 Ever since, there has been intense research devoted towards finding novel ligands with (anti-) histaminergic activity. -
New Prohibited Substances Addition to Procedures Using Triple Quadrupole LC/MS2 Technique
Poster MANFRED DONIKE WORKSHOP Pop V, Bican G, Pop A, Lamor M, Zorio M New prohibited substances addition to procedures using triple quadrupole LC/MS2 technique Romanian Doping Control Laboratory, Bucharest, ROMANIA Abstract New substances are added each year to the different classes of substances of WADA’s Prohibited List and have to be included in the test menu of each accredited doping control laboratory. For the analysis of some of these compounds the technique of choice is the LC/MS2 technique. Furthermore, with the decrease of MRPL levels, for stimulants from 500 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL and for narcotics from 200 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL, beginning from the entering in force on 1 January 2013 of the new WADA Technical Document TD2013MRPL, some of the compounds analyzed by the current GC/MS based procedure for stimulants and narcotics needed to be transferred to the LC/MS2 based procedure in order to lower their limit of detection. This paper-work presents the optimal conditions for preparation, separation and identification of new substances introduced to the LC/MS2 technique based procedures during the year 2012. Introduction Liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry is increasingly used in doping control laboratories [1]. The current work presents the optimization of the LC/MS2 detection parameters and the introduction of the prohibited substances in the existent procedures, depending on the characteristics of the studied compounds. The studied compounds are benzthiazide, cyclopenthiazide, cyclothiazide, epitizide, hydroflumethiazide and polythiazide (thiazide diuretic compounds), tramadol and its O-desmethyl metabolite (narcotic compound from the monitoring program [2]), cyclazodone, pentetrazole, prolintane, propylhexedrine and selegiline (stimulants transferred from the GC/MS- to the LC/MS2-based procedure due to the decreasing of the MRPL levels for stimulants and narcotics [3]). -
Profile of Pitolisant in the Management of Narcolepsy: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy
Journal name: Drug Design, Development and Therapy Article Designation: Review Year: 2018 Volume: 12 Drug Design, Development and Therapy Dovepress Running head verso: Romigi et al Running head recto: Pitolisant and narcolepsy open access to scientific and medical research DOI: 101145 Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Profile of pitolisant in the management of narcolepsy: design, development, and place in therapy Andrea Romigi1 Abstract: Narcolepsy is a rare sleep disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and Giuseppe Vitrani1 rapid eye movement sleep dysregulation, manifesting as cataplexy and sleep paralysis, as well Temistocle Lo Giudice1 as hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations. Disease onset may occur at any age, although Diego Centonze1,2 adolescents and young adults are mainly affected. Currently, the diagnosis delay ranges from Valentina Franco3 8 to 10 years and drug therapy may only attenuate symptoms. Pitolisant is a first-in-class new drug currently authorized by the European Medicines Agency to treat narcolepsy with or without 1IRCCS Istituto Neurologico cataplexy in adults and with an expanded evaluation for the treatment of neurologic diseases such Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy; 2Department of System as Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic and pharmacody- Medicine, University of Rome Tor namic profile of pitolisant, highlighting its effectiveness and safety in patients with narcolepsy. Vergata Rome, Italy; 3IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We report on the efficacy and safety data of pitolisant in narcoleptic patients regarding cataplexy episodes and subjective and objective daytime sleepiness. The development program of pitolisant was characterized by eight Phase II/III studies. -
Diuretics in Clinical Practice. Part I: Mechanisms of Action, Pharmacological Effects and 1
Review Diuretics in clinical practice. Part I: mechanisms of action, pharmacological effects and 1. Introduction clinical indications of diuretic 2. Principles of diuretic action and classification of diuretic compounds compounds † 3. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors Pantelis A Sarafidis , Panagiotis I Georgianos & Anastasios N Lasaridis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, 4. Osmotic diuretics 1st Department of Medicine, Thessaloniki, St. Kiriakidi 1, 54636, Thessaloniki, Greece 5. Loop diuretics 6. Thiazides and thiazide-related Importance of the field: Diuretics are among the most important drugs of our diuretics therapeutic armamentarium and have been broadly used for > 50 years, 7. Potassium-retaining diuretics providing important help towards the treatment of several diseases. Although all diuretics act primarily by impairing sodium reabsorption in the renal 8. Conclusion tubules, they differ in their mechanism and site of action and, therefore, in 9. Expert opinion their specific pharmacological properties and clinical indications. Loop diure- tics are mainly used for oedematous disorders (i.e., cardiac failure, nephrotic syndrome) and for blood pressure and volume control in renal disease; thiazides and related agents are among the most prescribed drugs for hypertension treatment; aldosterone-blockers are traditionally used for primary or secondary aldosteronism; and other diuretic classes have more specific indications. Areas covered in this review: This article discusses the mechanisms of action, pharmacological effects and clinical indications of the various diuretic classes For personal use only. used in everyday clinical practice, with emphasis on recent knowledge sug- gesting beneficial effects of certain diuretics on clinical conditions distinct from the traditional indications of these drugs (i.e., heart protection for aldosterone blockers). -
DIURETICS Diuretics Are Drugs That Promote the Output of Urine Excreted by the Kidneys
DIURETICS Diuretics are drugs that promote the output of urine excreted by the Kidneys. The primary action of most diuretics is the direct inhibition of Na+ transport at one or more of the four major anatomical sites along the nephron, where Na+ reabsorption takes place. The increased excretion of water and electrolytes by the kidneys is dependent on three different processes viz., glomerular filtration, tubular reabsorption (active and passive) and tubular secretion. Diuretics are very effective in the treatment of Cardiac oedema, specifically the one related with congestive heart failure. They are employed extensively in various types of disorders, for example, nephritic syndrome, diabetes insipidus, nutritional oedema, cirrhosis of the liver, hypertension, oedema of pregnancy and also to lower intraocular and cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Therapeutic Uses of Diuretics i) Congestive Heart Failure: The choice of the diuretic would depend on the severity of the disorder. In an emergency like acute pulmonary oedema, intravenous Furosemide or Sodium ethacrynate may be given. In less severe cases. Hydrochlorothiazide or Chlorthalidone may be used. Potassium-sparing diuretics like Spironolactone or Triamterene may be added to thiazide therapy. ii) Essential hypertension: The thiazides usually sever as primary antihypertensive agents. They may be used as sole agents in patients with mild hypertension or combined with other antihypertensives in more severe cases. iii) Hepatic cirrhosis: Potassium-sparing diuretics like Spironolactone may be employed. If Spironolactone alone fails, then a thiazide diuretic can be added cautiously. Furosemide or Ethacrymnic acid may have to be used if the oedema is regractory, together with spironolactone to lessen potassium loss. Serum potassium levels should be monitored periodically. -
Ehealth DSI [Ehdsi V2.2.2-OR] Ehealth DSI – Master Value Set
MTC eHealth DSI [eHDSI v2.2.2-OR] eHealth DSI – Master Value Set Catalogue Responsible : eHDSI Solution Provider PublishDate : Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 1 of 490 MTC Table of Contents epSOSActiveIngredient 4 epSOSAdministrativeGender 148 epSOSAdverseEventType 149 epSOSAllergenNoDrugs 150 epSOSBloodGroup 155 epSOSBloodPressure 156 epSOSCodeNoMedication 157 epSOSCodeProb 158 epSOSConfidentiality 159 epSOSCountry 160 epSOSDisplayLabel 167 epSOSDocumentCode 170 epSOSDoseForm 171 epSOSHealthcareProfessionalRoles 184 epSOSIllnessesandDisorders 186 epSOSLanguage 448 epSOSMedicalDevices 458 epSOSNullFavor 461 epSOSPackage 462 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 2 of 490 MTC epSOSPersonalRelationship 464 epSOSPregnancyInformation 466 epSOSProcedures 467 epSOSReactionAllergy 470 epSOSResolutionOutcome 472 epSOSRoleClass 473 epSOSRouteofAdministration 474 epSOSSections 477 epSOSSeverity 478 epSOSSocialHistory 479 epSOSStatusCode 480 epSOSSubstitutionCode 481 epSOSTelecomAddress 482 epSOSTimingEvent 483 epSOSUnits 484 epSOSUnknownInformation 487 epSOSVaccine 488 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 3 of 490 MTC epSOSActiveIngredient epSOSActiveIngredient Value Set ID 1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.10.1.3.1.42.24 TRANSLATIONS Code System ID Code System Version Concept Code Description (FSN) 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01 A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01 -
Initial Medication Selection for Treatment of Hypertension in an Open-Panel HMO
J Am Board Fam Pract: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.8.1.1 on 1 January 1995. Downloaded from Initial Medication Selection For Treatment Of Hypertension In An Open-Panel HMO Micky jerome, PharmD, MBA, George C. Xakellis, MD, Greg Angstman, MD, and Wayne Patchin, MBA Background: During the past 25 years recommendations for treating hypertension have evolved from a stepped-care approach to monotherapy or sequential monotherapy as experience has been gained and new antihypertensive agents have been introduced. In an effort to develop a disease management strategy for hypertension, we investigated the prescribing patterns of initial medication therapy for newly treated hypertensive patients. Methods: We examined paid claims data of an open-panel HMO located in the midwest. Charts from 377 patients with newly treated hypertension from a group of 12,242 hypertenSive patients in a health insurance population of 85,066 persons were studied. The type of medication regimen received by patients newly treated for hypertension during an 18-month period was categorized into monotherapy, sequential monotherapy, stepped care, and initial treatment with multiple agents. With monotherapy, the class of medication was also reported. Associations between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, or (3-blockers and presence of comorbid conditions were reported. Results: Fifty-five percent of patients received monotherapy, 22 percent received stepped care, and 18 percent received sequential monotherapy. Of those 208 patients receiving monotherapy, 30 percent were prescribed a calcium channel blocker, 22 percent an ACE inhibitor, and 14 percent a f3-blocker. No customization of treatment for comorbid conditions was noted.