DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX A1: FIELD SURVEY REPORT – WOLLOMBI STATION Please Refer to Pdf File Supplied Separately

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX A1: FIELD SURVEY REPORT – WOLLOMBI STATION Please Refer to Pdf File Supplied Separately APPENDIX A1: FIELD SURVEY REPORT – WOLLOMBI STATION Please refer to pdf file supplied separately. Byerwen Coal Project: Offset Delivery Plan EPBC 2010/5778 Page 122 of 141 BYERWEN COAL PROJECT STAGE 1 OFFSET ASSESSMENT Byerwen Coal Pty Ltd PO Box 5385 Brendale Q 4500 SEPTEMBER 2016 P 0448 899 649 F 07 3264 7131 E [email protected] Disclaimer The preparation of this report has been in accordance with the brief provided by the Client and relies upon data collected under limitations, as specified within the report. All findings, conclusions or recommendations contained within the report are based on the aforementioned circumstances and represent the professional opinions of Ecological Survey & Management. The report has been prepared for use by the Client and no responsibility for its use by other parties is accepted by Ecological Survey & Management. If a third party relies upon the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report without the prior consent of Ecological Survey & Management, the third party assumes all risk and releases and indemnifies Ecological Survey & Management from any loss, damage, claim or liability arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance upon this report. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the prior written consent of Ecological Survey & Management. Document History and Status Document version: 15061_Rpt01e Author(s): Meredith Watherston Reviewed by: Chris Hansen Approved by: Chris Hansen Signed : Date issued: 13 September 2016 Byerwen Coal Project Stage 1 Offset Assessment Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Scope of works ............................................................................... 2 1.2 Biodiversity offset strategy ............................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology .................................................................................. 4 1.3.1 Field survey .............................................................................. 5 1.3.2 Threatened species habitat searches ............................................ 5 1.3.3 Ecological equivalence scoring and determination of offset liabilities 6 2 Impact area survey results .................................................................... 7 2.1 Remnant regional ecosystems .......................................................... 7 2.2 Threatened fauna habitat ................................................................. 9 2.3 Watercourse vegetation ................................................................. 10 2.4 Connectivity areas ........................................................................ 11 2.5 Assessment of ecological condition of remnant vegetation. ................. 11 3 Offset areas survey results .................................................................. 14 3.1 Commonwealth EPBC Act Environmental Offsets Policy ...................... 16 3.1.1 Brigalow ................................................................................. 17 3.1.2 Squatter Pigeon (southern)....................................................... 26 3.1.3 Ornamental Snake ................................................................... 37 3.2 Queensland Biodiversity Offsets Policy ............................................. 46 3.2.1 Of concern REs ....................................................................... 47 3.2.2 Watercourses .......................................................................... 48 3.2.3 Connectivity ........................................................................... 48 3.2.4 Black-throated Finch ................................................................ 49 3.2.5 Common Death Adder .............................................................. 49 3.2.6 Australian Painted Snipe ........................................................... 50 3.2.7 King Bluegrass ........................................................................ 50 4 Outcomes ......................................................................................... 51 5 References ........................................................................................ 52 Ecological Survey & Management 15061 Rpt01e i Byerwen Coal Project Stage 1 Offset Assessment List of Tables Table 1: Stage 1 impacts to MNES and SSBV identified in the BOS (Earthtrade, 2015) ...................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Field-validated remnant regional ecosystems impacted in the Stage 1 assessment area ....................................................................... 8 Table 3: Impacted MNES and SSBV in Stage 1 that are proposed to be offset based on September and December 2015 field-validated data ...... 12 Table 4: Field-validated remnant and non-remnant regional ecosystems in the Wollombi Station offset investigation area .................................. 14 Table 5: EOP offset assessment for Brigalow TEC impacted by Stage 1 of the project ................................................................................... 20 Table 6: EOP offset assessment for Squatter Pigeon (southern) known habitat impacted by Stage 1 of the project ............................................ 28 Table 7: EOP offset assessment for Ornamental Snake known habitat impacted by Stage 1 of the project .......................................................... 39 Table 8: Comparison of ecological condition scores for BVG 17a in the Stage 1 impact area and proposed offset area ....................................... 48 List of Figures Figure 1: Location of Stage 1, remnant vegetation to be impacted and offset investigation area .................................................................... 55 Figure 2: Field-validated remnant vegetation mapping in the Stage 1 impact area ...................................................................................... 56 Figure 3: Assessment Units in the Stage 1 impact area .............................. 57 Figure 4: Field-validated vegetation mapping in the Wollombi Station Stage 1 offset investigation area ........................................................... 58 Figure 5: Assessment Units and proposed MNES offsets in the Wollombi Station Stage 1 offset investigation area ............................................... 59 Figure 6: Assessment Units and proposed SSBV offsets in the Wollombi Station Stage 1 offset investigation area ............................................... 60 Figure 7: Proposed offset areas .............................................................. 61 Figure 8: Biodiversity Planning Assessment corridor mapping for the Stage 1 impact and offset areas ............................................................ 62 Appendices Appendix A: EEM plot output summaries for each RE in the impact and offset areas Appendix B: Brigalow TEC – EPBC Act EOP Offset Calculator Assessment Appendix C: Squatter Pigeon – EPBC Act EOP Offset Calculator Assessment Appendix D: Ornamental Snake – EPBC Act EOP Offset Calculator Assessment Ecological Survey & Management 15061 Rpt01e ii Byerwen Coal Project Stage 1 Offset Assessment Symbols and Abbreviations * (Preceding a plant species name) plant species not native to Australia ± With or without, more or less AU Assessment Unit BoM Bureau of Meteorology BOS Biodiversity Offset Strategy BPA Biodiversity Planning Assessment BVG Broad Vegetation Group DotE (Commonwealth) Department of the Environment EDL Ecologically Dominant Layer EEM Ecological Equivalence Methodology EHP (Queensland) Department of Environment and Heritage Protection EIS Environmental Impact Statement Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 EOP Environmental Offset Policy (Commonwealth) Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act EPBC Act 1999 ha Hectares km Kilometres ML Mining Lease NC Act (Queensland) Nature Conservation Act 1992 MNES Matters of National Environmental Significance NRM (Queensland) Department of Natural Resources and Mines PMAV Property Map of Assessable Vegetation O_AU Offset Assessment Unit QBOP Queensland Biodiversity Offset Policy QEOP Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy 2014 Regional Ecosystem as defined under the Queensland Vegetation RE Management Regulation 2000 Former (Commonwealth) Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, SEWPaC Populations and Communities SPRAT Species Profile and Threats Database SSBV State Significant Biodiversity Values TEC Threatened Ecological Community VM Act (Queensland) Vegetation Management Act 1999 Ecological Survey & Management 15061 Rpt01e iii Byerwen Coal Project Stage 1 Offset Assessment 1 Introduction The Byerwen Coal Project (the project) is located approximately 20 km north- west of Glenden and 140 km west of Mackay in central Queensland. The project proposes to develop an open-cut mine to extract high quality hard coking coal for export overseas. The project will require water supply via a pipeline from the Burdekin-Moranbah Pipeline, a power supply upgrade, and rail facilities allowing transport of coal to the coal export terminal at the Port of Abbot Point near Bowen. The project covers an area of approximately 20,993 ha over six Mining Leases (MLs): 10355 (application), 10356 (application), 10357 (application), 70434 (application),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 ACARP Report
    2020 THE COAL INDUSTRY’S RESEARCH PROGRAM WWW.ACARP.COM.AU 1 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT ACARP’s role is to identify the coal industry’s research needs; Welcome to our 2020 ACARP Report. select and award research projects; and manage the research Ken Singer Manager Mine Control (UMM) BMA Much has been and will be written of 2020 with the impacts program, including communicating the outcomes to the industry of COVID-19 far reaching. ACARP was not immune. Saleable in a way that best accelerates their implementation. The focus Peter Smith General Manager HS Centennial Coal production recorded by ACARP for FY20 was 444.8 million tonnes continues to be on improving safety, boosting productivity and and ACARP funded $18.7 million in direct research spend. During minimising the environmental impacts of mining. Considerable Trevor Stay General Manager Gas Anglo American the second half of 2020 coal production reduced in response to focus this year has included research of dust particulate matter depressed coal demand. COVID-19 has had a minimal impact Andrew Swiericzuk Project Manager-Studies, Coal Australia Rio Tinto measurement, impacts and prevention and mine site rehabilitation on ACARP operations as we elected to curtail some service and the re-purposing of final voids in post mining landscapes. activities such as face to face meetings and travel. Reduced work A number of significant projects included in this report are funding approved 2015 arrangements introduced by Researchers including access to continuing, and we believe that these too will provide great workplaces and laboratories, travel restrictions limiting access benefits to the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Gina Rinehart 2. Anthony Pratt & Family • 3. Harry Triguboff
    1. Gina Rinehart $14.02billion from Resources Chairman – Hancock Prospecting Residence: Perth Wealth last year: $20.01b Rank last year: 1 A plunging iron ore price has made a big dent in Gina Rinehart’s wealth. But so vast are her mining assets that Rinehart, chairman of Hancock Prospecting, maintains her position as Australia’s richest person in 2015. Work is continuing on her $10billion Roy Hill project in Western Australia, although it has been hit by doubts over its short-term viability given falling commodity prices and safety issues. Rinehart is pressing ahead and expects the first shipment late in 2015. Most of her wealth comes from huge royalty cheques from Rio Tinto, which mines vast swaths of tenements pegged by Rinehart’s late father, Lang Hancock, in the 1950s and 1960s. Rinehart's wealth has been subject to a long running family dispute with a court ruling in May that eldest daughter Bianca should become head of the $5b family trust. 2. Anthony Pratt & Family $10.76billion from manufacturing and investment Executive Chairman – Visy Residence: Melbourne Wealth last year: $7.6billion Rank last year: 2 Anthony Pratt’s bet on a recovering United States economy is paying off. The value of his US-based Pratt Industries has surged this year thanks to an improving manufacturing sector and a lower Australian dollar. Pratt is also executive chairman of box maker and recycling business Visy, based in Melbourne. Visy is Australia’s largest private company by revenue and the biggest Australian-owned employer in the US. Pratt inherited the Visy leadership from his late father Richard in 2009, though the firm’s ownership is shared with sisters Heloise Waislitz and Fiona Geminder.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Facilities of Asia and the Pacific," 2007 (Open-File Report 2010-1254)
    Table1.—Attribute data for the map "Mineral Facilities of Asia and the Pacific," 2007 (Open-File Report 2010-1254). [The United States Geological Survey (USGS) surveys international mineral industries to generate statistics on the global production, distribution, and resources of industrial minerals. This directory highlights the economically significant mineral facilities of Asia and the Pacific. Distribution of these facilities is shown on the accompanying map. Each record represents one commodity and one facility type for a single location. Facility types include mines, oil and gas fields, and processing plants such as refineries, smelters, and mills. Facility identification numbers (“Position”) are ordered alphabetically by country, followed by commodity, and then by capacity (descending). The “Year” field establishes the year for which the data were reported in Minerals Yearbook, Volume III – Area Reports: Mineral Industries of Asia and the Pacific. In the “DMS Latitiude” and “DMS Longitude” fields, coordinates are provided in degree-minute-second (DMS) format; “DD Latitude” and “DD Longitude” provide coordinates in decimal degrees (DD). Data were converted from DMS to DD. Coordinates reflect the most precise data available. Where necessary, coordinates are estimated using the nearest city or other administrative district.“Status” indicates the most recent operating status of the facility. Closed facilities are excluded from this report. In the “Notes” field, combined annual capacity represents the total of more facilities, plus additional
    [Show full text]
  • For Personal Use Only SEDGMAN LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2015 PAGE 02
    For personal use only SEDGMAN LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2015 PAGE 02 Global Minerals OFFICES METALS & MINERALS COAL IRON ORE INFRASTRUCTURE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING (AGM) The 2015 Sedgman Limited AGM will be held at the Marriott Hotel, For personal use only 515 Queen Street, Brisbane, Queensland on Thursday 19 November 2015. Map: Sedgman has delivered projects and operations across the globe for more than 35 years, including in some of the world’s most remote regions. SEDGMAN LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2015 PAGE 03 Contents 04 Chairman’s Message 24 Board 06 CEO | Managing Director’s Report 25 Executive 10 Projects Review 27 Concise Financial Report 14 Operations Review 64 Additional Shareholder Information 18 HSE 66 Corporate Directory 20 Our People For personal use only SEDGMAN LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2015 PAGE 04 Chairman’s Message Our Net Profit After Tax (NPAT) for FY 2015 is a solid performance and testament of a sound strategy in difficult market conditions, which have beset many service providers to the minerals sector. By remaining focused on efficiently delivering solutions to our clients, Sedgman will continue to perform in the near term and beyond. I am indeed fortunate to present Confidence in the turnaround This year is the 10th year since my first Chairman’s message at enabled the Board to announce the company’s listing in 2006. a time of a strong recovery in during the year an enhanced Over that period we have experienced our earnings, accompanied by dividend plan. The 100% payout many swings and roundabouts, ratio, together with a series of including the China-fired boom in a solid share price appreciation special dividends (all fully franked), demand for minerals, the impact of and a lift in dividends.
    [Show full text]
  • Aussie Mine 2016 the Next Act
    Aussie Mine 2016 The next act www.pwc.com.au/aussiemine2016 Foreword Welcome to the 10th edition of Aussie Mine: The next act. We’ve chosen this theme because, despite gruelling market conditions and industry-wide poor performance in 2016, confidence is on the rise. We believe an exciting ‘next act’ is about to begin for our mid-tier miners. Aussie Mine provides industry and financial analysis on the Australian mid-tier mining sector as represented by the Mid-Tier 50 (“MT50”, the 50 largest mining companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange with a market capitalisation of less than $5bn at 30 June 2016). 2 Aussie Mine 2016 Contents Plot summary 04 The three performances of the last 10 years 06 The cast: 2016 MT50 08 Gold steals the show 10 Movers and shakers 12 The next act 16 Deals analysis and outlook 18 Financial analysis 22 a. Income statement b. Cash flow statement c. Balance sheet Where are they now? 32 Key contributors & explanatory notes 36 Contacting PwC 39 Aussie Mine 2016 3 Plot summary The curtain comes up Movers and shakers The mining industry has been in decline over the last While the MT50 overall has shown a steadying level few years and this has continued with another weak of market performance in 2016, the actions and performance in 2016, with the MT50 recording an performances of 11 companies have stood out amongst aggregated net loss after tax of $1bn. the crowd. We put the spotlight on who these movers and shakers are, and how their main critic, their investors, have But as gold continues to develop a strong and dominant rewarded them.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigalow Belt Bioregion – a Biodiversity Jewel
    Brigalow Belt bioregion – a biodiversity jewel Brigalow habitat © Craig Eddie What is brigalow? including eucalypt and cypress pine forests and The term ‘brigalow’ is used simultaneously to refer to; woodlands, grasslands and other Acacia dominated the tree Acacia harpophylla; an ecological community ecosystems. dominated by this tree and often found in conjunction with other species such as belah, wilga and false Along the eastern boundary of the Brigalow Belt are sandalwood; and a broader region where this species scattered patches of semi-evergreen vine thickets with and ecological community are present. bright green canopy species that are highly visible among the more silvery brigalow communities. These The Brigalow Belt bioregion patches are a dry adapted form of rainforest, relics of a much wetter past. The Brigalow Belt bioregion is a large and complex area covering 36,400 000ha. The region is thus recognised What are the issues? by the Australian Government as a biodiversity hotspot. Nature conservation in the region has received increasing attention because of the rapid and extensive This hotspot contains some of the most threatened loss of habitat that has occurred. Since World War wildlife in the world, including populations of the II the Brigalow Belt bioregion has become a major endangered bridled nail-tail wallaby and the only agricultural and pastoral area. Broad-scale clearing for remaining wild population of the endangered northern agriculture and unsustainable grazing has fragmented hairy-nosed wombat. The area contains important the original vegetation in the past, particularly on habitat for rare and threatened species including the, lowland areas. glossy black-cockatoo, bulloak jewel butterfl y, brigalow scaly-foot, red goshawk, little pied bat, golden-tailed geckos and threatened community of semi evergreen Biodiversity hotspots are areas that support vine thickets.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Company Resources
    MINING COMPANY RESOURCES Don’t miss out on this next wave of industry jobs, because if you can get into these industries, you can go a long way and there’s plenty of opportunity to build a solid career. You don’t need much experience, just a good mindset, a strong work ethic and being adaptable – that’s the kicker. Kickstart your research here: With so many new projects being developed in the coal, resource and construction sectors , there are good opportunities to carve out a kickass career in any of these industries. Mining companies and mining services companies This list will give you a head start when looking for mining job opportunities. • ADANI MINING • BRAVUS MINING AND RESOURCES • BECHTEL (CSG-LNG Project Management) • BHP BILLITON • CUESTA COAL • FORTESCUE METALS GROUP • GLOUCESTER COAL (Middlemount) • GVK • HANCOCK PROSPECTING • INTERNATIONAL COAL • RIO TINTO • TINKLER GROUP PTY LTD • NEWMOUNT • OZMINERALS • XSTRATA • YANCOAL If you’re based in the Queensland region see the list of Queensland mining companies and apply directly or shoot them an email regarding possible opportunities. Find out where the companies are located, Find out the history of the company, Read their latest company announcements and news, Discover where the latest mining activity is, Find out what types of minerals they are mining, Find out what sort of training you need, Review the jobs they currently advertise on their website jobs board and Prepare you resume to make it industry focused. MINING CONTRACTORS DIRECTORY BGC CONTRACTING ESSENTIAL MINING SERVICES BGC Contracting’s two operational business units (Mining Essential Mining Services (EMS) was established in 2006 and Civil) deliver a wide range of mining and construction and was predominantly an electrical based business with a services across the resources, oil and gas, government focus on underground mining.
    [Show full text]
  • Reported Daily Short Positions for 14/03/11
    Reported Daily Short Positions for 14/03/11 Disclaimer: No responsibility is accepted for any inaccuracies contained in the matter published. Product Product Code Reported Short Positions Total Product in Issue % of Total Product in Issue Reported as Short Positions ABACUS PROPERTY GRP. UNITS/ORD STAPLED ABP 1,325,850 378,483,581 0.34 ACRUX LIMITED ORDINARY ACR 114,976 166,143,711 0.07 ADAMUS RESOURCES ORDINARY ADU 835,688 448,304,191 0.19 ADAVALE RESOURCE LTD ORDINARY ADD 138,644 316,990,019 0.04 ADELAIDE BRIGHTON ORDINARY ABC 5,025,412 635,132,810 0.79 ADELAIDE MANAGED UNITS AYT 1 94,115,809 0.00 ADITYA BIRLA ORDINARY ABY 1,154,290 313,372,551 0.37 AED OIL LIMITED ORDINARY AED 2,176,480 201,321,320 1.09 AGL ENERGY LIMITED ORDINARY AGK 1,486,177 458,223,460 0.31 AGRICULTURAL LAND ORDINARY UNITS AGJ 30,575 92,201,537 0.03 AII200FINANCIALS ETF UNITS FIN 846 402,052 0.21 AJ LUCAS GROUP ORDINARY AJL 118,376 66,117,664 0.18 ALACER GOLD CORP. CDI 1:1 AQG 602,944 113,637,070 0.52 ALE PROPERTY GROUP STAPLED SECURITIES LEP 2,628 157,980,976 0.00 ALESCO CORPORATION ORDINARY ALS 5,522,796 94,193,403 5.86 ALINTA ENERGY GROUP STAPLED SECURITIES AEJ 19,765 807,058,872 0.00 ALKANE RESOURCES LTD ORDINARY ALK 2,697,908 269,028,158 1.00 ALLIANCE RESOURCES ORDINARY AGS 135,864 341,172,309 0.04 ALLIED GOLD LIMITED ORDINARY ALD 1,636,590 1,042,206,569 0.16 ALUMINA LIMITED ORDINARY AWC 21,032,763 2,440,196,187 0.85 18/03/2011 9:00:14 AM 1 Reported Daily Short Positions for 14/03/11 Disclaimer: No responsibility is accepted for any inaccuracies contained in the matter published.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure±Function Properties of Venom Components from Australian Elapids
    PERGAMON Toxicon 37 (1999) 11±32 Review Structure±function properties of venom components from Australian elapids Bryan Grieg Fry * Peptide Laboratory, Centre for Drug Design and Development, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia Received 9 December 1997; accepted 4 March 1998 Abstract A comprehensive review of venom components isolated thus far from Australian elapids. Illustrated is that a tremendous structural homology exists among the components but this homology is not representative of the functional diversity. Further, the review illuminates the overlooked species and areas of research. # 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Australian elapids are well known to be the most toxic in the world, with all of the top ten and nineteen of the top 25 elapids with known LD50s residing exclusively on this continent (Broad et al., 1979). Thus far, three main types of venom components have been characterised from Australian elapids: prothrombin activating enzymes; lipases with a myriad of potent activities; and powerful peptidic neurotoxins. Many species have the prothrombin activating enzymes in their venoms, the vast majority contain phospholipase A2s and all Australian elapid venoms are suspected to contain peptidic neurotoxins. In addition to the profound neurological eects such as disorientation, ¯accid paralysis and respiratory failure, characteristic of bites by many species of Australian elapids is hemorrhaging and incoagulable blood. As a result, these elapids can be divided into two main classes: species with procoagulant venom (Table 1) and species with non-procoagulant venoms (Table 2) (Tan and * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. 0041-0101/98/$ - see front matter # 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Practice Captive Reptile and Amphibian Husbandry Nature Conservation Act 1992
    Code of Practice Captive Reptile and Amphibian Husbandry Nature Conservation Act 1992 ♥ The State of Queensland, Department of Environment and Science, 2020 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without prior written permission of the Department of Environment and Science. Requests for permission should be addressed to Department of Environment and Science, GPO Box 2454 Brisbane QLD 4001. Author: Department of Environment and Science Email: [email protected] Approved in accordance with section 174A of the Nature Conservation Act 1992. Acknowledgments: The Department of Environment and Science (DES) has prepared this code in consultation with the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and recreational reptile and amphibian user groups in Queensland. Human Rights compatibility The Department of Environment and Science is committed to respecting, protecting and promoting human rights. Under the Human Rights Act 2019, the department has an obligation to act and make decisions in a way that is compatible with human rights and, when making a decision, to give proper consideration to human rights. When acting or making a decision under this code of practice, officers must comply with that obligation (refer to Comply with Human Rights Act). References referred to in this code- Bustard, H.R. (1970) Australian lizards. Collins, Sydney. Cann, J. (1978) Turtles of Australia. Angus and Robertson, Australia. Cogger, H.G. (2018) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia. Revised 7th Edition, CSIRO Publishing. Plough, F. (1991) Recommendations for the care of amphibians and reptiles in academic institutions. National Academy Press: Vol.33, No.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Reported Daily Short Positions for 16/06/11
    Reported Daily Short Positions for 16/06/11 Disclaimer: No responsibility is accepted for any inaccuracies contained in the matter published. Product Product Code Reported Short Positions Total Product in Issue % of Total Product in Issue Reported as Short Positions A-CAP RESOURCES ORDINARY ACB 46,983 200,104,986 0.02 ABACUS PROPERTY GRP. UNITS/ORD STAPLED ABP 1,519,321 378,483,581 0.41 ABM RESOURCES NL ORDINARY ABU 8,000,000 2,489,971,853 0.32 ACRUX LIMITED ORDINARY ACR 291,730 166,496,711 0.17 ADAMUS RESOURCES ORDINARY ADU 991,583 450,679,191 0.22 ADAVALE RESOURCE LTD ORDINARY ADD 138,644 316,990,019 0.04 ADELAIDE BRIGHTON ORDINARY ABC 5,613,250 636,277,810 0.86 ADELAIDE MANAGED UNITS AYT 1 94,115,809 0.00 ADITYA BIRLA ORDINARY ABY 1,273,024 313,372,551 0.40 AED OIL LIMITED ORDINARY AED 171,885 209,779,144 0.08 AGL ENERGY LIMITED ORDINARY AGK 4,301,557 461,311,732 0.90 AGRICULTURAL LAND ORDINARY UNITS AGJ 30,575 94,592,348 0.03 AIR NEW ZEALAND ORDINARY AIZ 22,000 1,090,032,579 0.00 AJ LUCAS GROUP ORDINARY AJL 165,242 66,117,664 0.25 ALACER GOLD CORP. CDI 1:1 AQG 719,149 71,549,568 1.01 ALE PROPERTY GROUP STAPLED SECURITIES LEP 2,899 157,980,976 0.00 ALESCO CORPORATION ORDINARY ALS 2,345,458 94,193,403 2.48 ALKANE RESOURCES LTD ORDINARY ALK 490,472 269,028,158 0.18 ALLIANCE RESOURCES ORDINARY AGS 135,864 341,172,309 0.04 ALLIED GOLD MIN PLC ORDINARY ALD 2,357,808 1,198,537,554 0.19 22/06/2011 9:00:15 AM 1 Reported Daily Short Positions for 16/06/11 Disclaimer: No responsibility is accepted for any inaccuracies contained in the matter published.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Faunal Values Within and Adjacent EPC 1029, Styx Basin, Central-East Queensland
    A preliminary assessment of faunal values within and adjacent EPC 1029, Styx Basin, central-east Queensland ) Prepared for Yeats Consulting Engineers by Ed Meyer, Ecological Consultant,S Luscombe Street, Runcorn QLD 4113 ([email protected]) Conditions of use This report may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned. The use of this report, or part thereof, for any other reason or purpose is prohibited without the written consent of the author. Front cover: Fauna recorded from EPC 1029 during March 2011 surveys. Clockwise from upper left: ornamental snake (Denisonia maculata); squatter pigeon (southern race) (Geophaps scripta scripta); metallic snake-eyed skink (Cryptoblepharus metal/icus); and eastern sedgefrog (Litoria tal/ax). ©Edward Meyer 2011 5 Luscombe Street, Runcorn QLD 4113 E-mail:[email protected] Version 2 _ 3 August 2011 2 Table of contents 1. Summary 4 2. Background 6 Description of study area 6 Nomenclature 6 Abbreviations and acronyms 7 3. Methodology 9 General approach 9 ) Desktop assessment 9 Likelihood of occurrence assessments 10 Field surveys 11 Survey conditions 15 Survey limitations 15 4. Results 17 Desktop assessment findings 17 Likelihood of occurrence assessments 17 Field survey results -fauna 20 Field survey results - fauna habitat 22 Habitat for conservation significant species 28 ) 5. Summary and conclusions 37 6. References 38 Appendix A: Fauna previously recorded from Desktop Assessment Study Area 41 Appendix B: likelihood of occurrence assessments for conservation significant fauna 57 Appendix C: March 2011 survey results 73 Appendix D: Habitat photos 85 Appendix E: Habitat assessment proforma 100 3 1. Summary The faunal values of land within and adjacent Exploration Permit for Coal (EPe) 1029 were investigated by way of desktop review of existing information as well as field surveys carried out in late March 201l.
    [Show full text]