Modelling of Carrying Capacity in National Park - Fruška Gora (Serbia) Case Study
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Serbian Academy of Science and Arts Digital Archive (DAIS) Open Geosci. 2017; 9:61–72 Research Article Open Access Aleksandra Vujko*, Jovan Plavša, Marko D. Petrović, Milan Radovanović, and Tamara Gajić Modelling of carrying capacity in National Park - Fruška Gora (Serbia) case study DOI 10.1515/geo-2017-0005 terminant of sustainable development, there is a so-called Received September 24, 2015; accepted June 25, 2016 carrying capacity. It is a measure of the resistance of a sin- gle locality and its power to take certain influences from Abstract: Negative effects of tourism development in a des- the environment. In many research studies, human im- tination are usually the consequence of the high concen- pact was indicated as the main factor of pressure and in- tration of tourists, accommodation facilities and the activ- fluence on the biophysical characteristics of the protected ities that are practiced in a relatively restricted area. One areas [1–3]. Thus, to save region and its original resources of the most important measures to protect the areas is to that attract visitors, tourism should not be over-developed. calculate the maximum number of tourists that can simul- It has to be self-limiting in its development ambitions, to taneously reside in a region, i.e. the determination of the find the upper limit of the development in a given spatial carrying capacity. This paper outlines a method for deter- coverage (region, area and place); otherwise it can lead to mining carrying capacity based on zoning of environmen- self-destruction [4]. Fruška Gora Mountain was declared tal resources and zoning within a region. The paper argues as a national park in 1960, in order to provide permanent for a return to the idea of identifying maximum appropri- protection and enhancement of its natural beauty and val- ate number of users. The main hypothesis of the paper is ues. The area of active protection covers 25,393.00 ha [5, 6]. based on the statement that the development of tourism in The current condition and the size of contractive zone Fruška Gora (Mountain) National Park in Northern Serbia and sports and recreational amenities of Fruška Gora Na- must be in accordance with the basic principles of sustain- tional Park are on the level of national tourism values, ability, including the determination of carrying capacity. with a tendency to spread internationally. In this respect, The main research goal was to show the opinion of local there would be an attempt to connect the following into residents about the uncontrolled development of tourism, a single unit: tourist attractions, sports and recreational and to determine the carrying capacity in four sports and tourism in the national park, zoning, system of trails for recreational zones of the mountain. The carrying capacity hiking, mountain biking and horseback riding, various of the area is calculated by Lavery and Stanev formulas. sports and recreational activities. In the area of Fruška Keywords: carrying capacity; zoning; sustainability; Gora National Park, four characteristic zones can be iden- tourism; Fruška Gora National Park tified with about 600 km of trails intended primarily for cycling, hiking and horseback riding. On some paths there would also be certain points for enjoying many sports and 1 Introduction recreational activities, such as flying and water sports, as well as various games. The observed mountain area (which includes the National Park) covers the area of approxi- When it comes to protected areas, especially those natu- mately 50,800.00 ha. In this regard, there is a need to ral, such as national parks, as a distinct and decisive de- determine the quantitative units expressed in the num- ber of persons per unit of time, which may reside within such territory, or on each individual path [7]. As numbers *Corresponding Author: Aleksandra Vujko: Novi Sad Business of visitors to national parks have increased over recent School, Novi Sad, Serbia, E-mail: [email protected] decades [8–10], many management agencies have limited Jovan Plavša: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Science, Depart- numbers through various mechanisms. This is a common, ment of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Novi Sad, but unpopular tool to reduce impacts. If agencies banned Serbia powered vehicles, restricted camping to designated sites Marko D. Petrović, Milan Radovanović: Geographical Institute ”Jovan Cvijić”, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SASA), Bel- and limited the campsites available, that would restrict grade, Serbia the total number of visitors. Broader systems limit the to- Tamara Gajić: Novi Sad Business School, Novi Sad, Serbia © 2017 Aleksandra Vujko et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. Unauthenticated Download Date | 3/17/17 11:17 PM 62 Ë Aleksandra Vujko et al. tal number of people in the park through a road entrance eventually lead to the loss of biodiversity [16, 17]. While sig- turnstile system. More sophisticated measures use book- nificant progress has been made in evaluating carrying ca- ing systems, control numbers by charging high entrance or pacity, some of the methods lack analytical rigor [1]. There permit fees, divide parks into zones, allow only one group are several different conceptual bases for carrying capac- per zone at any time. All these approaches need mecha- ity. One is social: the visitor density at which the number nisms to determine what the threshold visitor number is, of meetings, sightseeing, or other unplanned interactions and how the carrying capacity concept originated [11]. Car- among individuals or groups begins to reduce their pleas- rying capacities in nature are not fixed, static, or simple ant experience. Another is economic: visitors must pay en- relations. They are contingent on technology, preferences trance fees or travel costs, and the amount paid decreases and the structure of production and consumption. They with crowding. Economic carrying capacity is the number are also contingent on the ever-changing state of interac- of visitors that maximizes real or notional net revenue, i.e. tions between the physical and biotic environment [12, 13]. number of visitors x per capita payment - less infrastruc- The study aims to analyze sport and recreational tourism ture and support costs. The third is ecological: the num- landscape components (carrying capacity of all four zones ber of visitors, which produces no detectable, or at least in Fruška Gora National Park), on the basis of the opinion no irreversible, ecological change to the ecosystems in the of the local population. The main subject of this research area concerned. Due to recreational succession, social car- is the examination of how human activities do affect nat- rying capacity increases over time, as the type of visitor ural surroundings in a vulnerable protected area, such as changes. For those craving solitude and wilderness, so- the observed national park. The obtained data were ana- cial carrying capacity may be only one person per 100 km2 lyzed by appropriate statistical methods, which were de- in areas traversed by foot, or orders of magnitude lower scriptive and comparative in nature, enabling the explica- in areas traversed by bycicle or vehicle. For those craving tion of the research results and the performance of certain nightlife and social interactions, hundreds of thousands of conclusions. The analysis is aimed at checking whether people per km2 may be fine. Thus, social carrying capac- there is a connection among groups of participants and the ity is meaningful only under a management regime, which probability of connection. The attitudes and opinion of lo- prevents recreational succession and filters the types of cal residents helped in understanding the potential nega- visitors. Similar considerations are applied to economic tive aspects of uncontrolled development of tourism in the carrying capacity. If allowable activities permitted in an National Park, while Stanev and Lavery formulas helped area are predetermined, and visitors are charged entrance determining the maximum potential of sports and recre- fees as for zoos or private wildlife parks, then the eco- ational tourists in certain areas along the projected path. nomic carrying capacity is the number of visitors, which maximizes revenue [11, 18]. Because of this and because of recreational succession, setting visitor numbers to max- 2 Literature review imize revenues will produce high crowding and ecologi- cal damage. Ecological carrying capacity also suffers ma- jor limitations, unless the concept is much more precisely The negative impact of tourism on national parks is a defined. All visitors create some impacts, so if ecological global problem. Tourism generates air and noise pollution, carrying capacity is defined as the threshold of zero im- aesthetic degradation, littering, trampling, etc. According pact, then it will always be zero. Of course, an impact is to Finnessey [14], there are three main sources of impact only known to be nonzero if it is detectable. But detec- left on national parks by tourists: depletion of natural re- tion thresholds can be highly variable, depending on the sources, pollution and physical impacts. Visitor impacts, parameter measured, detection technologies, patterns of caused by sport and recreational tourism activities (walk- natural variation, sampling