DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations • Nations Unies HEADQUARTERS • SIEGE NEW YORK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

J .. ........... "". - -- -... - [J I I 1/-jl) '87-T- United Nations • Nations Unies HEADQUARTERS • SIEGE NEW YORK. NY 10017 TEL. : I (212) 457. 12 65 • FAX: I ( 212) 457. 4041 COUNTER-TERRORISM COMMITTEE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE 11 November 2011 Dear Mr Nambiar, Please find attached a document passed to me by the Secretary-General on 9 November regarding a petition related to an individual who is on the resolution 1267 list. As discussed yesterday, I suggest that this matter be referred to the resolution 1267 Ombudsperson, Ms Kimberley Prost. With best regards Mike Smith Executive Director Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate UNITED NATIONS • NATIONS UNIES Kimberly Prost Ombudsperson AI Qaidaffaliban Security Council Committee United Nations Headquarters Tel : (212) 963 2671 Office of the Ombudsperson Fax: (212) 963 1300/3778 TB-08041D email: [email protected] New York, NY 10017 USA or [email protected] Web address: http://www.un.org/en/sc/ombudsperson/ SUMMARY AND CASE HISTORY IN THE MATTER OF: YASSIN ABDULLAH KADI AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EXTANT 19 SEPTEMBER 2011 Case History Summary File 1- Updated Excerpts by Masood after 22 Jun 2007 below. 2 - From the Katz Rebuttal # 1 report, Page 11 to 34, CHRONOLOGY A brief history of the allegations against Mr Kadi is provided as follows: Date Description 11 Terrorists attacked the World Trade Centre (Twin Towers) in September New York and other prominent US targets. 2001 15 The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland ("OAGS") September opened a criminal investigation against ''persons unknown" 2001 (inconnus) arising out of the September the 11th attacks because a number of Swiss nationals were victims of the attacks. 12 October US Treasury and UK Treasury issued simultaneous press 2001 releases, in substantially identical terms, instructing financial institutions to freeze the assets of Mr Kadi held in the USA and the UK (together with in each case the assets of an identical list of other named persons and organisations). The effect of these measures was to freeze all Mr Kadi's assets and prevent him from doing any form of business in the US and the UK. To make matters worse, both Press Releases also branded him in no uncertain terms as a terrorist or a supporter of terrorism. Neither US Treasury nor UK Treasury has ever provided any sufficient or adequate information as to the basis of listing to enable Mr Kadi to investigate the allegations against him and respond. 15 October Mr Kadi's UK lawyers wrote to Sir Andrew Turnbull, Permanent 2001 Secretary to UK Treasury, to: • complain about the seriously defamatory content of the UK Press Release; • ask that Mr Kadi's name be removed from the list; • request that UK Treasury provide to them the information and evidence upon which Mr Kadi was Case History Summary File 1- Updated Excerpts by Masood after 22 Jun 2007 below. 2 - From the Katz Rebuttal# 1 report, Page 11 to 34, nr,:a,n~rorl hu fl.llr ~ .... ~~. .. _ ~ : - '"'--'--- - . included in the list; and • seek assurances that UK Treasury had seen and examined any available evidence against Mr Kadi and that it did not simply act on the "say so" of the US Authorities. 19 October UK Treasury replied , in the Treasury's Solicitor's letter dated 19 2001 October 2001 , that their decision was "on the basis of intelligence information provided to [UK Treasury] by the US Treasu,Y' which UK Treasury declined to provide on the grounds that such information had been provided in confidence. Mr Kadi was, therefore, accused of the gravest of offences in relation to international terrorism and yet those making the allegations were not prepared to tell him anything about the nature of the allegations against him, a striking example of the lack of due process, which has pervaded the allegations against Kadi since the outset (Flaw 9) . UK Treasury also stated in their letter dated 19 October 2001 that if Mr Kadi successfully persuaded the US Treasury to terminate the freezing measures against him in the USA, then in that event UK Treasury was "very likely" to terminate the measures it had taken in relation to Mr Kadi , thus indicating the UK had effectively abrogated responsibility over the matter to the US authorities. 19 October On the same day, and at the request of the US, the UN Security 2001 Council Committee ("UNSCC") Concerning Afghanistan issued a further addendum , once again by way of Press Release, of entities and persons identified by the Committee pursuant to paragraph 8( c) of Resolution 1333 (2000). This provision of Resolution 1333 (2000) mandates all States to take further measures to freeze without delay funds and other financial assets of UBL and individuals and entities alleged to be associated with him as designated by the Committee. The UN Case History Summary File 1- Updated Excerpts by Masood after 22 Jun 2007 below .. 2 - From the Katz Rebuttal# 1 report, Page 11 to 34, issued a list of names in its Press Release, which included Mr Kadi. 25 October The criminal investigation in Switzerland, originally launched 2001 against "inconnus" (unknown persons) by the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland, was extended to Mr Kadi, based on his listing by OFAC and Mr Kadi's inclusion in what the Swiss authorities referred to as "Bush list 2". 8 November Mr Kadi commenced proceedings in the High Court in London 2001 for a "Judicial Review" of UK Treasury's decision to freeze his assets. Judicial Review is a legal procedure in England and Wales, whereby an Applicant can challenge the decision of a public body before the High Court (Case reference C0/4532/01 ). 12 In the High Court in London the Honourable Mr Justice Scott­ November Baker (as he then was) heard Mr Kadi's application for 2001 permission for Judicial Review. The Judge without hesitation granted Mr Kadi permission to proceed with his action for Judicial Review. In the course of doing so the Judge said (of UK Treasury's Order freezing Mr Kadi's assets): - "... the validity of this draconian order is being challenged and, on the face of it, with some reason at the moment ... in my view, this case is very important because it is crucial that when there are question marks about orders of this kind and draconian nature, they are properly tested in the Courts". Mr Justice Scott-Baker ordered UK Treasury to provide Mr Kadi's legal advisers with its evidence on an expedited basis. 16 UK Treasury provided evidence in the form of a statement by November Joseph Halligan, Assistant Secretary at UK Treasury. In his 2001 statement (paragraph 7) Mr Halligan stated that on the morning Case History Summary File 1- Updated Excerpts by Masood after 22 Jun 2007 below. 2 - From the Katz Rebuttal# 1 report, Page 11 to 34, of 12 October 2001 there was passed to him a fax from the US Treasury Department dated 11 October 2001 ("the Two-Page Fax"), which included details about Mr Kadi. After Mr Kadi refuted the contents of the Two-Page Fax, OFAC was later to deny that the Two-Page Fax came from it. A copy of the Two­ Page Fax is at Annexe 1. Subsequently OFAC was forced reluctantly to accept the Two­ Page Fax was sent from the fax number of the Office of Intelligence Support within US Treasury and thus that the Two­ Page Fax emanated from OFAC. OFAC has expressly acknowledged that the Two-Page Fax contains fundamental false statements and allegations concerning Mr Kadi , including that he has a brother, Omar ai-Qadi, who is allegedly the Director of Mercy International - USA. As stated above, Mr Kadi has sisters but no brothers. 29 A letter ("the Aufhauser letter") was sent from the US Treasury November authorities to the Swiss authorities containing allegations, which 2001 formed the alleged basis of Mr Kadi's designation. For some weeks following the designation of Mr Kadi , the Swiss authorities had been pressing the US to provide details of the alleged basis relied on by US Treasury for Mr Kadi's listing. The letter was sent, eventually, via fax from Mr David Aufhauser, and then the General Counsel at the US Treasury Department, to Mr Nicati dated 29 November 2001 . This letter, a copy of which is at Annexe 2 relies in large part on the false allegations in the Robert Wright Affidavit, concerning assistance Mr Kadi provided to the Quranic Literacy Institute ("QLI") which Mr Kadi has comprehensively refuted in his submissions to OFAC. The Robert Wright Affidavit, and in turn the Aufhauser letter which relies on it, have in effect been superseded by the acquittal of Muhammad Salah in February 2007 by a federal jury in Chicago of charges that he was part of a long-running Case History Summary File 1- Updated Excerpts by Masood after 22 Jun 2007 below .. 2 - From the Katz Rebuttal# 1 report, Page 11 to 34, nn:~n~rP.rl h\/ r\nr ~' " ' rt.JI ~ r+ i " ,...,.,,..,..~ o. · -• ~ ' -- _.- - conspiracy to finance Hamas activities in Israel. The remainder of the Aufhauser letter contained other false allegations against Mr Kadi , which are refuted in the detailed section of this Rebuttal, including that Mr Kadi may have been linked to two transactions involving accounts at Faisal Finance, including two substantial wire transfers to an account held by Mousa Abu Marzook, described as a "Hamas Operative". In fact, neither of these transfers had anything to do with Mr Kadi. 17 Mr Kadi comprehensively refuted the contents of the Two-Page December Fax in his First Witness Statement. In refuting the Two-Page Fax 2001 Mr Kadi stated that he had no brother as alleged by OFAC (whether named Omar ai-Qadi or otherwise) and that he had only sisters.
Recommended publications
  • ISIS Propaganda and United States Countermeasures

    ISIS Propaganda and United States Countermeasures

    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Fall 2015 ISIS Propaganda and United States Countermeasures Daniel Lincoln Stevens As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons Recommended Citation Stevens, Daniel Lincoln, "ISIS Propaganda and United States Countermeasures" (2015). MSU Graduate Theses. 1503. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/1503 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISIS PROPAGANDA AND UNITED STATES COUNTERMEASURES A Masters Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Defense and Strategic Studies By Daniel Stevens December 2015 Copyright 2015 by Daniel Lincoln Stevens ii ISIS PROPAGANDA AND UNITED STATES COUNTERMEASURES Defense and Strategic studies Missouri State University, December 2015 Master of Science Daniel Stevens ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is threefold: 1. Examine the use of propaganda by the Islamic State in Iraq and al Sham (ISIS) and how its propaganda enables ISIS to achieve its objectives; 2.
  • The BCCI Affair

    The BCCI Affair

    The BCCI Affair A Report to the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate by Senator John Kerry and Senator Hank Brown December 1992 102d Congress 2d Session Senate Print 102-140 This December 1992 document is the penultimate draft of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee report on the BCCI Affair. After it was released by the Committee, Sen. Hank Brown, reportedly acting at the behest of Henry Kissinger, pressed for the deletion of a few passages, particularly in Chapter 20 on "BCCI and Kissinger Associates." As a result, the final hardcopy version of the report, as published by the Government Printing Office, differs slightly from the Committee's softcopy version presented below. - Steven Aftergood Federation of American Scientists This report was originally made available on the website of the Federation of American Scientists. This version was compiled in PDF format by Public Intelligence. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATION ............................................................................... 21 THE ORIGIN AND EARLY YEARS OF BCCI .................................................................................................... 25 BCCI'S CRIMINALITY .................................................................................................................................. 49 BCCI'S RELATIONSHIP WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS CENTRAL BANKS, AND INTERNATIONAL
  • An End Run Around the First Amendment: „Libel Tourists‟ Take Aim Overseas

    An End Run Around the First Amendment: „Libel Tourists‟ Take Aim Overseas

    An End Run Around the First Amendment: „Libel Tourists‟ Take Aim Overseas By Ryan Feeney 2008 Pulliam Kilgore Intern Bruce W. Sanford Bruce D. Brown Laurie A. Babinski BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Washington, D.C. Counsel to the Society of Professional Journalists September 2008 In the throes of the American Civil Rights movement as Southern blacks flexed their political might against segregation, a city commissioner in Alabama sued the country‟s most prominent newspaper, The New York Times. L.B. Sullivan‟s libel suit sought to silence the implication of his critics that he was part of a racist Southern oligarchy responsible for the violent suppression of black protests in Montgomery. It failed, and an uniquely American brand of free speech was born. In deciding that landmark free-speech case, New York Times v. Sullivan, 1 the U.S. Supreme Court noted how libel suits such as Sullivan‟s threatened “the very existence of an American press virile enough to publish unpopular views on public affairs.” Throughout modern American history, linking a person to an unpopular group has often led to a rash of libel suits against the press. It happened with communism in the 1940s, organized crime in the 1970s, and homosexuality in the 1980s under the stigmatizing glare of the AIDS epidemic. Yet in the more than four decades since the New York Times decision, American libel plaintiffs have found it acutely difficult to muzzle the press. But these free speech protections apply only on American soil, which means they cannot be used against the latest wave of libel litigants who bring suits overseas – foreigners accused of terrorism ties.
  • Supplemental Brief on Second Circuit Decision

    Supplemental Brief on Second Circuit Decision

    Case 1:03-md-01570-GBD-FM Document 2140 Filed 10/17/2008 Page 1 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) IN RE: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON ) Civil Action No. 03 MDL 1570 (GBD) SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 ) ) ) This document relates to: All Actions SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON SECOND CIRCUIT DECISION October 17, 2008 Case 1:03-md-01570-GBD-FM Document 2140 Filed 10/17/2008 Page 2 of 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY............................................................................................1 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................................4 I. THE SECOND CIRCUIT’S DECISION COMPELS DISMISSAL OF ALL OFFICIAL-CAPACITY CLAIMS AGAINST REMAINING FSIA DEFENDANTS ...................................................................................................................4 A. The FSIA Protects Individuals Acting in Their Official Capacity ..........................5 B. The Two Remaining Saudi Entities Are “Agencies or Instrumentalities” of Saudi Arabia...........................................................................6 C. The FSIA’s Torts Exception Does Not Apply Here ................................................9 D. The Commercial Activities Exception to the FSIA Does Not Apply Here.............................................................................................................11
  • Course Syllabus Georgetownx

    Course Syllabus Georgetownx

    TERRORISM AND COUNTERTERRORISM SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 – DECEMBER 2, 2015 Course Syllabus GeorgetownX August 31, 2015 GeorgetownX: Terrorism and Counterterrorism SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 – DECEMBER 2, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Core Faculty ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Interviews ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 Faculty Support Team ............................................................................................................................................. 4 What is the course about? ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Key Questions .................................................................................................................................................... 5 What does the course include? .............................................................................................................................. 5 Course Section Outline ....................................................................................................................................... 6 What will I learn in the course? .............................................................................................................................. 8 What should we expect from each
  • Earlier Report on Saudi Arabia's Measures to Combat Money

    Earlier Report on Saudi Arabia's Measures to Combat Money

    MIDDLE EAST & NORTH AFRICA FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE Mutual Evaluation Report Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 25 June 2010 The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a member of the Middle East & North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF). It is also a member of the Gulf Co-operation Council, which is a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The Mutual Evaluation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was conducted as a joint exercise between the MENAFATF and the FATF. The Mutual Evaluation Report was considered and adopted by the MENAFATF at its plenary meeting in Yasmine Hammamet, Tunisia on 4 May 2010, and then by the FATF at its plenary in Amsterdam on 25 June 2010, which introduced limited changes to it. © 2010 FATF/OECD. All rights reserved. No reproduction or translation of this publication may be made without prior written permission. Requests for permission to further disseminate, reproduce or translate all or part of this publication should be made to the FATF Secretariat, 2 rue André Pascal 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France (fax +33 1 44 30 61 37 or e-mail: [email protected]) Mutual Evaluation Report of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INFORMATION AND METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA .................................................................................................................. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................
  • Terrorism in the Indo-Pacific: the Year Gone by and the Road Ahead

    Terrorism in the Indo-Pacific: the Year Gone by and the Road Ahead

    FEATURE Terrorism in the Indo-Pacific * The Year Gone By and the Road Ahead DR. SAM MULLINS lobally, terrorism has been on the decline since peaking in 2014, the year that the Islamic State (ISIS) declared its “caliphate” in the Middle East. Nevertheless, terrorism levels are still approximately double what they Gwere a decade ago and around five times what they were in 2001.1 The Indo- Pacific region, which encompasses most of Asia, as well as North America, Aus- tralasia, Oceania, and parts of South America, consistently experiences some of the highest rates of terrorism in the world, and 2019 was no exception.2 This ar- ticle, though by no means an exhaustive account, provides a roughly chronological overview of significant terrorist activities in the Indo-Pacific during the past year, with a particular focus on South and Southeast Asia. This is followed by several important advances in counterterrorism (CT). The article concludes by consider- ing what these, and other developments, may portend for the future. An Evolving Threat: Significant Developments in 2019 Suicide Bombing in the Philippines The year began with a deadly, twin suicide bombing of the Cathedral of Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Jolo in the southern Philippines, in which 23 people lost their lives and scores more were injured. Executed by 35-year-old Rullie Rian Zeke and his 32-year- old wife, Ulfah Handayani Saleh, both from Indonesia, the attack was demonstrative of the enduring potency of the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG), which orchestrated it, as well as Jamaah Ansharut Daulah ( JAD), which the two perpetrators had been members of in Indonesia.3 It furthermore under- scored the continuing influence of ISIS (with which both ASG and JAD are aligned), the threat of foreign fighters, the heightened popularity of sectarian targets, and the importance of family ties between militants in the region.
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE, Vol. 154, Pt. 16

    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE, Vol. 154, Pt. 16

    22810 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE, Vol. 154, Pt. 16 September 27, 2008 LOFGREN, as much time as she may constrained by the first amendment and thus It prohibits a federal or state court from en- need. may provide less protection to defamation forcing a defamation judgment entered in an- Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California. I defendants than our Constitution requires. other country for publication involving a matter would certainly like to commend Con- (5) While our Nation’s courts will generally enforce foreign judgments as a matter of of public concern, unless the court first deter- gressman RODRIGUEZ and Senator comity, comity does not require that courts mines that the judgment is consistent with the SCHUMER. This is a measure that I sup- enforce foreign judgments that are repug- free-speech clause of our Constitution’s First port. nant to our Nation’s fundamental constitu- Amendment. Mr. Speaker, I would just like to note tional values, in particular its strong protec- H.R. 6146 responds to the problem of what there is another measure that we have tion of the right to freedom of speech. is sometimes called ‘‘libel tourism.’’ This is the marked up in the Judiciary Committee (6) Our Nation’s courts should only enforce disturbing practice of suing authors for defa- that would broadly assist our Amer- foreign judgments as a matter of comity mation in foreign countries rather than in the ican soldiers and their families. I hope when such foreign judgments are consistent United States, so as to avoid the speech-pro- with the right to freedom of speech.
  • How Isis Uses Social Media for Recruitment

    How Isis Uses Social Media for Recruitment

    HOW ISIS USES SOCIAL MEDIA FOR RECRUITMENT Major Ata AlSarayreh JCSP 46 PCEMI 46 Solo Flight Solo Flight Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and do Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs et not represent Department of National Defence or ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Ministère de Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used la Défense nationale ou des Forces canadiennes. Ce without written permission. papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par le Minister of National Defence, 2020. ministre de la Défense nationale, 2020. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 46 – PCEMI 46 2019-2020 SOLO FLIGHT HOW ISIS USES SOCIAL MEDIA FOR RECRUITMENT By Maj Ata. AlSarayreh “This paper was written by a candidate “La présente étude a été rédigée par attending the Canadian Forces College un stagiaire du Collège des Forces in fulfillment of one of the requirements canadiennes pour satisfaire à l'une des of the Course of Studies. The paper is exigences du cours. L'étude est un an academic document, and thus document qui se rapporte au cours et contains facts and opinions which the contient donc des faits et des opinions author alone considered appropriate que seul l'auteur considère appropriés and correct for the subject. It does not et convenables au sujet. Elle ne reflète necessarily reflect the policy or the pas nécessairement la politique ou opinion of any agency, including the l'opinion d'un organisme quelconque, y Government of Canada and the compris le gouvernement du Canada et Canadian Department of National le ministère de la Défense nationale du Defense.
  • "Legal Jihad": How Islamist Lawfare Tactics Are Targeting Free Speech

    "Legal Jihad": How Islamist Lawfare Tactics Are Targeting Free Speech

    "LEGAL JIHAD": HOW ISLAMIST LAWFARE TACTICS ARE TARGETING FREE SPEECH Brooke Goldstein andAaron Eitan Meyer* I. WELCOME TO LAWFARE .............................. 395 II. THE ISLAMIST MOVEMENT ............................. 396 III. LEGAL JIHAD ....................................... 397 IV. LAWFARE IN EUROPE & CANADA ....................... 400 V. ENGLAND .......................................... 402 V I. CANADA ........................................... 404 VII. THE NETHERLANDS .................................. 405 VEII. THE INTERNATIONAL SCENE ........................... 407 IX. CONCLUSION ....................................... 409 I. WELCOME TO LAWFARE Lawfare is usually defined as the use of the law as a weapon of war' or the pursuit of strategic aims through aggressive legal maneuvers.2 Traditionally, lawfare tactics have been used to obtain moral advantages over the enemy in the court of public opinion3 and to intimidate heads of state from acting out of fear of prosecution for war crimes.4 Al Qaeda training manuals instruct its captured * Brooke Goldstein is a practicing attorney, an adjunct fellow at the Hudson Institute, an award- winning filmmaker and director of the Legal Project at the Middle East Forum. The Legal Project is dedicated to providing pro-bono legal representation to authors, activists and publishers who work on the topics of radical Islam, terrorism and their sources of financing. Goldstein is the founder and director of the Children's Rights Institute, a not-for-profit dedicated to raising awareness about and legally combating the incitement and recruitment of children as suicide bombers. She is also the 2007 recipient of the E. Nathaniel Gates Award for Outstanding Public Advocacy. Aaron Eitan Meyer recently received his Juris Doctor degree from Touro Law Center, and serves as the assistant director at the Legal Project at the Middle East Forum as well as legal correspondent to the Terror Finance Blog.
  • Terrorist-Funds-Banks-Etc.Pdf

    Terrorist-Funds-Banks-Etc.Pdf

    Testimony of Steven Emerson Before the House Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations "PATRIOT Act Oversight: Investigating Patterns of Terrorist Fundraising“ Fund-Raising Methods and Procedures for International Terrorist Organizations February 12, 2002 Steven Emerson Executive Director The Investigative Project [email protected] Washington, DC STEVEN EMERSON A Biographical Sketch 5505 Connecticut Avenue, NW, #341, Washington DC 20015-2601 Phone: (202) 363-8602 Fax: (202) 966-5191 E-Mail: [email protected] Steven Emerson is an internationally recognized expert on terrorism and national security, a correspondent, and an author who also serves as the Executive Director of The Investigative Project. His current book, American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us, published by The Free Press, details the rise of the militant Islamic infrastructure in the United States and provides the most comprehensive account of the major fundamentalist Islamic cells on American soil to date. Mr. Emerson started The Investigative Project in late 1995 following the broadcast of his documentary film, "Jihad in America," on public television. The film exposed video of clandestine operations of militant Islamic terrorist groups on American soil. For the film, Mr. Emerson received numerous awards including the George Polk Award for best television documentary, one of the most prestigious awards in journalism. He also received the top prize from the Investigative Reporters and Editors Organization (IRE) for best investigative report in both print and television for the documentary. The award from the IRE was the fourth such award he had received from that group. Since 1996, Mr. Emerson has testified more than a dozen times before Congress on such topics as the terrorist infrastructure in the US, Palestinian violations of the Oslo accords, the protection of America's national infrastructure, and the threat of Islamic fundamentalism against the United States and the West.
  • Course Syllabus Georgetownx

    Course Syllabus Georgetownx

    TERRORISM AND COUNTERTERRORISM: AN INTRODUCTION SELF-PACED COURSE THROUGH MARCH 24, 2018 Course Syllabus GeorgetownX Self-Paced Course through March 24, 2018 GeorgetownX: Terrorism and Counterterrorism: An Introduction SELF-PACED COURSE THROUGH MARCH 24, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Core Faculty ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Interviews ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 Faculty Support Team ............................................................................................................................................ 3 What is the course about? ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Key Questions .................................................................................................................................................... 4 What does the course include? .............................................................................................................................. 4 Course Section Outline ...................................................................................................................................... 5 What will I learn in the course? .............................................................................................................................