DOCSLIB.ORG

Neuro Informatics 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Neuro Informatics 2010 August 30 - September 1 Kobe, Japan ABSTRACT BOOK Neuroinformatics 2010 3rd INCF Congress of Neuroinformatics Program and Abstracts August 30 to September 1, 2010 Kobe, Japan Neuroinformatics 2010 1 Welcome to the 3rd INCF Congress in Kobe, Japan! Neuroinformatics 2010 is organized by the INCF in cooperation with the INCF Japan Node. As with the two first INCF Congress- es (in Stockholm and Pilsen), the Kobe meeting brings together neuroinformatics researchers from numerous disciplines and dozens of countries. The single-track program includes five keynote speakers, four scientific workshops and two poster and demonstration sessions. In addition, the last half day will be devoted to an INCF Japan Node special session with lectures and discussions on INCF global initiatives and neuroinformatics in the Asian-Pacific circle. We also collaborate with the Neuro2010 conference, which follows immediately and spans a broad variety of neuroscience. In all, we anticipate an exceptional sci- entific event that will help raise the level of neuroinformatics research worldwide. Please enjoy the many fine presentations, posters, and demos! David Van Essen Washington University School of Medicine, USA INCF 2010 Program Committee Chair Organizers Program Committee: Kenji Doya, Principal Investigator, IRP-OIST David Van Essen (Chair) - Washington University School of Program Chair, Neuro2010 Medicine Keiji Tanaka, Deputy Director, RIKEN BSI Richard Baldock - Medical Research Council, Edinburgh Delegate, INCF Japan-Node Svein Dahl - University of Tromsø Erik De Schutter - Okinawa Institute of Science and Tech- Committee Members nology Yoshimi Kamiyama, Professor, Aichi Prefectual University Kenji Doya - Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Chair, Visiome Platform, INCF Japan-Node Mark Ellisman - University of California at San Diego Toshio Iijima, Vice President, Tohoku University Patric Hagmann - Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lau- Chair, BMI Platform in INCF Japan-Node sanne Ryohei Kanzaki, Professor, Tokyo University Astrid Prinz - Emory University Chair, Invertebrate Brain Platform, INCF Japan-Node Idan Segev - The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ryoji Suzuki, Specially Appointed Professor, Kanazawa Shiro Usui - RIKEN BSI Institute of Technology Chair, Neuroimaging Platform, INCF Japan-Node David Willshaw - University of Edinburgh Tadashi Isa, Professor, National Institute for Physiological Local Organizing Committee: Sciences Chair, Integrative Brain Research Project, INCF Japan-Node Chair Soichi Nagao, Laboratory Head, RIKEN BSI Shiro Usui, Director, RIKEN BSI Chair, Cerebellar PF, INCF Japan-Node Delegate, INCF Japan-Node Teiichi Furuichi, Laboratory head, RIKEN BSI Chair, CDT-DB Platform, INCF Japan-Node Executive Members Yoko Yamaguchi, Laboratory Head, RIKEN BSI, Mitsuo Kawato, Director, ATR CNL Chair, Dynamic Brain Platform, INCF Japan-Node Chair, 33rd Annual Meeting of the Japan Neuroscience Hidetoshi Ikeno, Professor, University of Hyogo Society Chair, Simulation Platform, INCF Japan-Node Kazuhide Inoue, Professor, Kyushu University Chair, 53rd Annual Meeting of the Japan Society for Neuro- Advisor chemistry Shun-ichi Amari, Special Advisor, RIKEN BSI Shin Ishii, Professor, Kyoto University Former Vice-Chair, INCF Chair, 20th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Neural Network Society Congress Manager Pontus Holm Neuroinformatics 2010 2 The International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF, www.incf.org) coordinates and fosters international activities for discovery and innovation in neuroscience and related fields. Established in 2005 through the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Global Science Forum, the INCF catalyzes global knowledge flow and scientific interaction by developing, maintaining and evaluating worldwide programs, standards, guidelines and infrastructures in neuroinformatics to further our understanding of the human brain and its diseases. With its Secretariat at Karolinska Institutet and Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, the INCF achieves its international outreach through its national nodes in 15 current member countries across the globe. Neuroinformatics 2010 3 INCF Japan-Node (http://www.neuroinf.jp/) The Neuroinformatics Japan Center at the RIKEN Brain Science Institute represents the INCF Japan Node. Together with the Japan Node Committee and the Platform Committees, it promotes domestic activities in neuroinformatics. Platform Commit- tee members collaborate to develop databases that are available for online use. Shared databases are called “platforms” and the Platform Committees are made up of researchers throughout Japan involved in building these platforms. Platforms in Japan-Node: • Visiome Platform • Brain Machine Interface Platform • Invertebrate Brain Platform • Cerebellar Development Transcriptome Database • Comprehensive Brain Science Network Platform • Cerebellar Platform • Neuroimaging Platform • Dynamic Brain Platform • BSI-NI Platform • Simulation Platform Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to the following organizations for supporting Neuroinformatics2010, the Japan-Node Special Symposium and for co-hosting symposium in Neuro2010. • OMRON Corporation • Brain Science Foundation • Tateishi Science and Technology Foundation • Portopia ‘81 Memorial Fund • Tsutomu Nakauchi Foundation • Sankyo Foundation of Life Science • RIKEN BSI • MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in JAPAN) Neuroinformatics 2010 4 Neuro Informatics 2011 Boston, USA, September 4-6 Program Committee Mitsuo Kawato (Chair, Japan) Upinder S. Bhalla (India) Jan Bjaalie (Norway) Kenji Doya (Japan) Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski (Sweden) Sean Hill (Switzerland) David N. Kennedy (USA) Local Organizing Committee Friedrich Sommer (USA) David N. Kennedy, Chair (UMass Medical School) David Van Essen (USA) Randy Buckner (Harvard University) Blaise Frederick (Harvard Medical School) Michael Haselmo (Boston University) Ron Kikinis (Harvard Medical School) Jean King (UMass Medical School) Maryann Martone (UCSD) Bruce R. Rosen (Harvard Medical School) Alan Ruttenberg (Science Commons) Clifford Saper (Harvard Medical School) Neuroinformatics 2010 www.neuroinformatics2011.org5 Sponsors About Frontiers Frontiers is more than just an open-access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals... Frontiers Journal Series The Frontiers Journal Series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of open-access, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers Journal Series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to Quality Each Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world’s best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public - and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. WHY PUBLISH? World Class Editors - disclosed on all accepted articles Constructive and Efficient Review - the first real-time review in publishing Instantaneously Online - claim your discovery with paper pending Rapid Publication - on average, 3 months from submission to acceptance Indexing in Major Archives - PubMed Central, Google Scholar and more Copyright Retention by Authors - freely print and distribute your articles Global Dissemination - over 240,000 readers in 160 countries Article Impact - advanced analytics on real-time impact of your article Democratic Article Tiering - distill the best published research By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new 21st century generation. Neuroinformatics 2010 6 Sponsors iGroup Asia Pacific Limited based in Bangkok, Thailand, represents a variety of contents and services from a growing number of publishers around the world. Introducing products for Neuroinformatics 2010: -Journal of Visualized Experiments -Life Science Video Library -Peer Reviewed Video Journal -Included in Pubmed -Morgan & Claypool -Online and Print books -New Publisher since 2005. -WizFolio -New Reference Management service -Manage whole files which was fulltext ,video and MPEG. -Turnitin2 -Plagiarism Checking service on the Internet -Teaching tool about writing skill -PolyVision Interactive Whiteboard -PolyVision integrates time-tested tools
Recommended publications
  • Computational Neuroscience Meets Optogenetics: Unlocking the Brain’S Secrets

    Computational Neuroscience Meets Optogenetics: Unlocking the Brain’S Secrets

    Health & Medicine ︱ Prof Simon Schultz and Dr Konstantin Nikolic Computational neuroscience meets optogenetics: Unlocking the brain’s secrets Working at the interface omposed of billions of specialised responsible for perception, action Simplified models allow researchers to study how the geometry of a neuron’s “dendritic tree” affects its ability to process information. between engineering and nerve cells (called neurons) wired and memory. But this is changing. neuroscience, Professor Simon C together in complex, intricate Schultz and Dr Konstantin webs, the brain is inherently challenging LET THERE BE LIGHT Nikolic at Imperial College to study. Neurons communicate with A powerful new tool (invented by Boyden of Neurotechnology and Director of SHEDDING LIGHT ON THE BRAIN AN INSIGHT INTO NEURONAL GAIN London are developing tools each other by transmitting electrical and and Deisseroth just a little over a decade the Imperial Centre of Excellence in Their innovative approach uses Using two biophysical models of to help us understand the chemical signals along neural circuits: ago) allows researchers to map the brain’s Neurotechnology, Dr Konstantin Nikolic, sophisticated two-photon microscopy, neurons, genetically-modified to include intricate workings of the brain. signals that vary both in space and time. connections, giving unprecedented Associate Professor in the Department optogenetics and electrophysiology two distinct light-sensitive proteins Combining a revolutionary Until now, technical limitations in the access to the workings of the brain. Its of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, to measure (and disturb) patterns of (called opsins): channelrhodopsin-2 technology – optogenetics available research methods to study the impressive resolution enables precise and Dr Sarah Jarvis are taking a unique neuronal activity in vivo (in living tissue).
  • Student Guide to Msc Studies Institute of Informatics, University of Szeged

    Student Guide to Msc Studies Institute of Informatics, University of Szeged

    Student Guide to MSc Studies Institute of Informatics, University of Szeged 2. Contact information Address: Árpád square 2, Szeged, Hungary Postal Address: Institute of Informatics 6701 Szeged, Hungary, P. O. Box 652. Telephone: +36 62 546396 Fax: +36 62 546397 E-mail: [email protected] Url: http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu 2 3. Contents 1. Title page................................................................................................................................1 2. Contact information...............................................................................................................2 3. Contents.................................................................................................................................3 4. Foreword................................................................................................................................4 5. Organization...........................................................................................................................5 6. Main courses..........................................................................................................................6 7. Education...............................................................................................................................8 8. Research...............................................................................................................................10 9. Miscellania...........................................................................................................................11
  • Implantable Microelectrodes on Soft Substrate with Nanostructured Active Surface for Stimulation and Recording of Brain Activities Valentina Castagnola

    Implantable Microelectrodes on Soft Substrate with Nanostructured Active Surface for Stimulation and Recording of Brain Activities Valentina Castagnola

    Implantable microelectrodes on soft substrate with nanostructured active surface for stimulation and recording of brain activities Valentina Castagnola To cite this version: Valentina Castagnola. Implantable microelectrodes on soft substrate with nanostructured active sur- face for stimulation and recording of brain activities. Micro and nanotechnologies/Microelectronics. Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 2014. English. tel-01137352 HAL Id: tel-01137352 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01137352 Submitted on 31 Mar 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSETHÈSE En vue de l’obtention du DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE Délivré par : l’Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier (UT3 Paul Sabatier) Présentée et soutenue le 18/12/2014 par : Valentina CASTAGNOLA Implantable Microelectrodes on Soft Substrate with Nanostructured Active Surface for Stimulation and Recording of Brain Activities JURY M. Frédéric MORANCHO Professeur d’Université Président de jury M. Blaise YVERT Directeur de recherche Rapporteur Mme Yael HANEIN Professeur d’Université Rapporteur M. Pascal MAILLEY Directeur de recherche Examinateur M. Christian BERGAUD Directeur de recherche Directeur de thèse Mme Emeline DESCAMPS Chargée de Recherche Directeur de thèse École doctorale et spécialité : GEET : Micro et Nanosystèmes Unité de Recherche : Laboratoire d’Analyse et d’Architecture des Systèmes (UPR 8001) Directeur(s) de Thèse : M.
  • ECE 5070: Neuroengineering and Neuroprosthetics

    ECE 5070: Neuroengineering and Neuroprosthetics

    ECE 5070: Neuroengineering and Neuroprosthetics Course Description An overview of the broad field of Neuroengineering for graduate and senior undergraduate students with engineering or neuroscience backgrounds. Focusing on neural interfaces and prostheses, this course covers from basic neurophysiology and computational neuronal models to advanced neural interfaces and prostheses currently being actively developed in the field. Transcript Abbreviation: Neur Eng & Prosth Grading Plan: Letter Grade Course Deliveries: Classroom Course Levels: Undergrad, Graduate Student Ranks: Junior, Senior, Masters, Doctoral Course Offerings: Autumn Flex Scheduled Course: Never Course Frequency: Even Years Course Length: 14 Week Credits: 3.0 Repeatable: No Time Distribution: 3.0 hr Lec Expected out-of-class hours per week: 6.0 Graded Component: Lecture Credit by Examination: No Admission Condition: No Off Campus: Never Campus Locations: Columbus Prerequisites and Co-requisites: Prereq: 3050 or BME 3703; or Neurosc 3010; or Grad standing in Engineering or Neurosc. Exclusions: Not open to students with credit for 5194.03 or Neurosc 5070. Cross-Listings: Cross-listed in Neurosc. Course Rationale: Introduce students a vibrant, interdisciplinary field which integrates engineering and neuroscience principles for treating neurological disorders. The course is required for this unit's degrees, majors, and/or minors: No The course is a GEC: No The course is an elective (for this or other units) or is a service course for other units: Yes Subject/CIP Code: 14.1001 Subsidy Level: Doctoral Course Programs Abbreviation Description CpE Computer Engineering EE Electrical Engineering Course Goals Master principles of neural interfaces. Be competent with computational neural models. Be competent with design of common neuroprostheses.
  • 094 on Reinforcing Learning in Engineering Education by Means of Interactive Pen Displays

    094 on Reinforcing Learning in Engineering Education by Means of Interactive Pen Displays

    03 Engineering Education 160-227_Layout 1 18/09/2012 1:35 π.μ. Page 202 40th annual 23-26 September 2012 conference Thessaloniki, Greece Engineering Education Research 094 On Reinforcing Learning in Engineering Education by Means of Interactive Pen Displays J. Fabra1, J. Civera, J. R. Asensio Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain {jfabra, jcivera, jrasensi}@unizar.es Conference Topic: Engineering Education Research, Information and Communication Technologies. Keywords: ICT in Education, Interactive Pen Displays, Tablet PC, Engineering Education, Poll Analysis he use of traditional blackboards imposes several constraints in the learning experience, being the most relevant: 1) the unidirectional communication channel they provide; 2) their limited T graphical possibilities; and 3) the impossibility of recovering the sequential flow of the lecture once it has finished. In engineering lectures, these constraints represent serious limitations. In order to overcome them, digital slides have been traditionally used. More recently, digital displays and tablets have been used to further improve the learning process. Interactive Pen Displays (from Wacom manufacturer) are display devices with some particularities over Tablet PC’s that naturally overcome most of these constraints. First, existing software provides endless display possibilities (geometric drawings, colors, simulations, graphs…). Also, not only the lecture re- sults can be accurately recorded, but also the whole lecture process in its temporal dimension. This frees students from the tedious task of recording and taking notes and provides richer resources for their posterior autonomous work, as well as allowing recordings to be uploaded as learning objects to collaborative learning environments such as Blackboard or Moodle, for instance.
  • New Technologies for Human Robot Interaction and Neuroprosthetics

    New Technologies for Human Robot Interaction and Neuroprosthetics

    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics 2017-07-01 Human-Robot Interaction and Neuroprosthetics: A review of new technologies Cangelosi, A http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9872 10.1109/MCE.2016.2614423 IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. CEMAG-OA-0004-Mar-2016.R3 1 New Technologies for Human Robot Interaction and Neuroprosthetics Angelo Cangelosi, Sara Invitto Abstract—New technologies in the field of neuroprosthetics and These developments in neuroprosthetics are closely linked to robotics are leading to the development of innovative commercial the recent significant investment and progress in research on products based on user-centered, functional processes of cognitive neural networks and deep learning approaches to robotics and neuroscience and perceptron studies. The aim of this review is to autonomous systems [2][3]. Specifically, one key area of analyze this innovative path through the description of some of the development has been that of cognitive robots for human-robot latest neuroprosthetics and human-robot interaction applications, in particular the Brain Computer Interface linked to haptic interaction and assistive robotics. This concerns the design of systems, interactive robotics and autonomous systems. These robot companions for the elderly, social robots for children with issues will be addressed by analyzing developmental robotics and disabilities such as Autism Spectrum Disorders, and robot examples of neurorobotics research.
  • Brain-Machine Interface: from Neurophysiology to Clinical

    Brain-Machine Interface: from Neurophysiology to Clinical

    Neurophysiology of Brain-Machine Interface Rehabilitation Matija Milosevic, Osaka University - Graduate School of Engineering Science - Japan. Abstract— Long-lasting cortical re-organization or II. METHODS neuroplasticity depends on the ability to synchronize the descending (voluntary) commands and the successful execution Stimulation of muscles with FES was delivered using a of the task using a neuroprosthetic. This talk will discuss the constant current biphasic waveform with a 300μs pulse width neurophysiological mechanisms of brain-machine interface at 50 Hz frequency via surface electrodes. First, repetitive (BMI) controlled neuroprosthetics with the aim to provide transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) intermittent theta implications for development of technologies for rehabilitation. burst protocol (iTBS) was used to induce cortical facilitation. iTBS protocol consists of pulses delivered intermittently at a I. INTRODUCTION frequency of 50 Hz and 5 Hz for a total of 200 seconds. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) neuroprosthetics Moreover, motor imagery protocol was used to display a can be used to applying short electric impulses over the virtual reality hand opening and closing sequence of muscles or the nerves to generate hand muscle contractions movements (hand flexion/extension) while subject’s hands and functional movements such as reaching and grasping. remained at rest and out of the visual field. Our work has shown that recruitment of muscles using FES goes beyond simple contractions, with evidence suggesting III. RESULTS re-organization of the spinal reflex networks and cortical- Our first results showed that motor imagery can affect level changes after the stimulating period [1,2]. However, a major challenge remains in achieving precise temporal corticospinal facilitation in a phase-dependent manner, i.e., synchronization of voluntary commands and activation of the hand flexor muscles during hand closing and extensor muscles [3].
  • Practical and Ethical Issues at the Intersection of Brain Science and Society

    Practical and Ethical Issues at the Intersection of Brain Science and Society

    Emerging Neurotechnologies: Practical and Ethical Issues at the Intersection of Brain Science and Society James Giordano PhD Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry Neuroethics Studies Program, Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics Georgetown University Medical Center Washington, DC, USA and EU-Human Brain Project SP-12 Uppsala University, Sweden Neuroscience… • Huge leaps using technology to study and understand how nervous systems and brains are structured and function. Allowed understanding at certain levels of causality: – Formal: Overall “workings” of biological systems – Material: Structure and functional roles of neurons, glia But not at others… – Efficient: How “grey stuff” actually makes “great stuff” – Final: For what? To what “ends”? Core Questions... What do we do with the information and capability we have? What do we do about the information and capability we don’t? Questions toward Innovation • Tools to Theory • Theory to Tools... ...to Theory AISC Approach Brain Science on the World Stage • EU Human Brain Project • US BRAIN initiative • China Brain Project • Japan Brain Project • Global NeuroS/T Economic Predictions 2025 – Asia – US/Western Europe – South America Neuroscience and Technologies (NeuroS/T) • Assessment – Biomarkers – Genetics/genomics – Imaging – Brain modeling/mapping • Interventional – Technopharmaceutics – P-Stim – Neurofeedback – Transcranial Modulation – Deep Brain Stimulation – BCI – Neuroprosthetics • Derivative – -Artificial neural networks – -AI technologies A-3: Actual Ability to Assess...Access...Affect To What Effect(s) and Ends? Neuroimaging – PET – CT – MR – fMR – DTI – MEG/qEEG Can we Scan the Brain to Depict Consciousness and/or “Read” Minds? text copyright, J. Giordano, 2014 Neurogenetics – Genotyping – Phenotyping – Proteomics – Genetic Intervention(s) Can we “Predict” or “Create” Present and Future “Selves”? text copyright, J.
  • A Research Agenda for Augmented and Virtual Reality in Architecture

    A Research Agenda for Augmented and Virtual Reality in Architecture

    Advanced Engineering Informatics 45 (2020) 101122 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Advanced Engineering Informatics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aei A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, T engineering and construction ⁎ ⁎ Juan Manuel Davila Delgadoa, , Lukumon Oyedelea, , Peter Demianc, Thomas Beachb a Big Data Enterprise and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, University of West of England Bristol, UK b School of Engineering, Cardiff University, UK c School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: This paper presents a study on the usage landscape of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in the Augmented reality architecture, engineering and construction sectors, and proposes a research agenda to address the existing gaps Virtual reality in required capabilities. A series of exploratory workshops and questionnaires were conducted with the parti- Construction cipation of 54 experts from 36 organisations from industry and academia. Based on the data collected from the Immersive technologies workshops, six AR and VR use-cases were defined: stakeholder engagement, design support, design review, Mixed reality construction support, operations and management support, and training. Three main research categories for a Visualisation future research agenda have been proposed, i.e.: (i) engineering-grade devices, which encompasses research that enables robust devices that can be used in practice, e.g. the rough and complex conditions of construction sites; (ii) workflow and data management; to effectively manage data and processes required by ARandVRtech- nologies; and (iii) new capabilities; which includes new research required that will add new features that are necessary for the specific construction industry demands.

  • A Framework to Assess the Military Ethics of Human Enhancement Technologies

    2017-06-09 DRDC-RDDC-2017-L167 Produced for: Paul Comeau, DRDC Chief Scientist Scientific Letter A Framework to Assess the Military Ethics of Human Enhancement Technologies Key Points . Human enhancements may be achieved through devices or drugs that augment or modify human performance. Militaries have used enhancements for years to improve soldier performance. Science and technology progress in human enhancements have outpaced regulatory policies. Emerging enhancements may raise ethical questions and face policy barriers that impede their development, evaluation and eventual adoption by the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). It is imperative to consider the military ethical issues raised by human enhancement technologies before they are adopted by the CAF. A framework was developed to assess the military ethical issues associated with human enhancements. Identifying potential ethical issues early will enable policymakers to design policies that ensure the safe and ethical use of human enhancements, and will also allow the CAF to be prepared to deal with enhanced adversaries. Background Human enhancement has been defined in the literature in various ways.1-3 We define it herein as any science and technology (S&T) approach that temporarily or permanently modifies or contributes to human functioning. S&T efforts to enhance human health and performance are not new; vaccines (considered enhancements because they augment the immune system’s ability to protect against disease) have been used since the 18th century.4 Human enhancements permeate many aspects of society. Wearable health monitors like FitBits, which can inform changes in behaviour to improve health,5,6 are used by millions of people worldwide.
  • Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

    Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

    Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience Dieter Jaeger • Ranu Jung Editors Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience With 1109 Figures and 71 Tables Editors Dieter Jaeger Ranu Jung Department of Biology Department of Biomedical Engineering Emory University Florida International University Atlanta, GA, USA Miami, FL, USA ISBN 978-1-4614-6674-1 ISBN 978-1-4614-6675-8 (eBook) ISBN 978-1-4614-6676-5 (print and electronic bundle) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6675-8 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014958664 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
  • Ethics in Published Brain–Computer Interface Research

    Ethics in Published Brain–Computer Interface Research

    Journal of Neural Engineering PERSPECTIVE Related content - Informed consent in implantable BCI Ethics in published brain–computer interface research: identification of research risks and recommendations for development of best practices research Eran Klein and Jeffrey Ojemann - Ethical issues in neuroprosthetics To cite this article: L Specker Sullivan and J Illes 2018 J. Neural Eng. 15 013001 Walter Glannon - Perspective Patrick Rousche, David M Schneeweis, Eric J Perreault et al. View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 128.189.236.17 on 21/01/2019 at 19:11 IOP Journal of Neural Engineering Journal of Neural Engineering J. Neural Eng. J. Neural Eng. 15 (2018) 013001 (6pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aa8e05 15 Perspective 2018 Ethics in published brain–computer © 2018 IOP Publishing Ltd interface research JNEIEZ L Specker Sullivan2 and J Illes1 013001 1 National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada 2 Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America L Specker Sullivan and J Illes E-mail: [email protected] Received 6 June 2017, revised 14 September 2017 Accepted for publication 21 September 2017 Published 8 January 2018 Printed in the UK Abstract Objective. Sophisticated signal processing has opened the doors to more research with human JNE subjects than ever before. The increase in the use of human subjects in research comes with a need for increased human subjects protections. Approach. We quantified the presence or 10.1088/1741-2552/aa8e05 absence of ethics language in published reports of brain–computer interface (BCI) studies that involved human subjects and qualitatively characterized ethics statements.