STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION (Under Right to Information Act, 2005) Samachara Hakku Bhavan, D.No.5-4-399, ‘4’ Storied Commercial Complex, Housing Board Building, Mojam Jahi Market, – 500 001. Phone Nos: 040-24740107 (o); 040-24740592(f) Appeal No.21596/CIC-(peshi-2)/2017 Dated:12-02-2019 Appellant : Sri Mohd: Ashraf, -504296.

Respondent : The :Public Information Officer (U/RTI Act,2005) / O/o The District Collector, District-506167.

The First Appellate Authority (U/RTI Act, 2005) / O/o The District Collector, Jangaon District-506167. O R D E R

1. Sri Mohd Ashraf, R/o Kagaznagar, filed 2nd appeal dated 05-09-2017 which was received by this Commission on 07-09-2017 for not getting the information sought by him from the PIO / O/o The District Collector, Jangaon District-505476.and 1st Appellate Authority / O/o The District Collector, Jangaon District-505476.

2. The brief facts of the case as per the appeal and other records received along with it are that the appellant herein filed an application dated 10-06-2017 before the PIO requesting to furnish the information under Sec.6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, on the following points mentioned in his application:

3. The Public Information Officer has not furnished the information to the Appellant. 4. Since the appellant did not receive the information from the Public Information Officer, he filed 1st appeal dated 18-07-2017 before the 1st Appellate Authority requesting him to furnish the information sought by him u/s 19(1) of the RTI Act, 2005.

5. The 1st Appellate Authority has not furnished the information to the Appellant.

6. As the appellant did not get the information from the Public Information Officer / 1st Appellate Authority even after 30 days of filing his 1st appeal, he preferred this 2nd appeal before this Commission requesting to take action against the PIO and 1st Appellate Authority for not furnishing information sought by him and also to arrange to furnish the information sought by him u/s 19(3) of the RTI Act, 2005.

The 2nd appeal was taken on file and notices were issued to both the parties for hearing on 12-02-2019.

On 12-02-2019 the case is called. The Appellant is absent. The Public Information Officer, District Revenue Officer, is present.

The Public Information Officer submitted that on the application filed by the appellant a letter to all the District Offices in the District was addressed on dt.25-03-2017 with instruction to follow the guidelines issued by the Government while hiring the Private Vehicles and the appellant was informed of the same.

The PIO further submitted that no vehicles are hired in the office of the District Collector. The respective Unit Officers of the Departments are authorized to hire the vehicles and no compliants are received in the matter.

The Commission directs the PIO to issue necessary instruction to the DTO and all the STOS in the District to ensure the implementation of guidelines issued by the Government scrupulously at the time of passing of bills.

With the above direction, the appeal case is closed. Dr. Raja Sadaram Soma Chief Information Commissioner Authenticated by:

Assistant Registrar Copy to: IT Section/SF