• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Flux Compactification 1,2, 3,4, Michael R. Douglas ∗ and Shamit Kachru † 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway NJ 08855 U.S.A. 2Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques, 35 route des Chartres, Bures-sur-Yvette France 91440 3Department of Physics and SLAC, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 4Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 We review recent work in which compactifications of string and M theory are constructed in which all scalar fields (moduli) are massive, and supersymmetry is broken with a small positive cosmological constant, features needed to reproduce real world physics. We explain how this work implies that there is a “landscape” of string/M theory vacua, perhaps containing many candidates for describing real world physics, and present the arguments for and against this idea. We discuss statistical surveys of the landscape, and the prospects for testable consequences of this picture, such as observable effects of moduli, constraints on early cosmology, and predictions for the scale of supersymmetry breaking. Contents 2. A full example 42 I. INTRODUCTION 1 V. STATISTICS OF VACUA 43 A. Methodology and basic definitions 43 II. A QUALITATIVE PICTURE 5 1. Approximate distributions and tuning factors 44 A. Overview of string and M theory compactification 5 B. Counting flux vacua 45 1. Supersymmetry 6 1. IIb vacua on a rigid CY 45 2. Heterotic string 7 2. General theory 47 3. Brane models 8 C. Scale of supersymmetry breaking 50 B. Moduli fields 9 D. Other distributions 52 C. Calabi-Yau manifolds and moduli spaces 11 1. Gauge groups and matter content 52 1. Examples 11 2. Yukawa couplings and other potential terms 53 2. Moduli space - general properties 11 3. Calabi-Yau manifolds 54 D. Flux compactification: Qualitative overview 12 4. Absolute numbers 54 1. Freund-Rubin compactification 13 E. Model distributions and other arguments 55 E. A solution of the cosmological constant problem 14 1. Central limit theorem 55 1. Anthropic selection 15 2. Random matrix theory 56 F. Other physical consequences 16 3. Other concentrations of measure 56 1. Overview of spontaneous supersymmetry breaking 16 4. Non-existence arguments 56 2. The moduli problem 18 5. Finiteness arguments 57 3. The scale of supersymmetry breaking 19 F. Interpretation 57 4. Early universe cosmology 21 VI. CONCLUSIONS 59 III. QUANTUM GRAVITY, THE EFFECTIVE POTENTIAL AND STABILITY 22 Acknowledgements 60 A. The effective potential 22 B. Approximate effective potential 23 References 60 C. Subtleties in semiclassical gravity 24 arXiv:hep-th/0610102v3 12 Jan 2007 D. Tunneling instabilities 25 E. Early cosmology and measure factors 26 I. INTRODUCTION F. Holographic and dual formulations 28 IV. EXPLICIT CONSTRUCTIONS 28 It is an old idea that unification of the fundamental A. Type IIb D3/D7 vacua 29 forces may be related to the existence of extra dimen- 1. 10d solutions 29 sions of space-time. Its first successful realization appears 2. 4d effective description 30 in the works of Kaluza (1921) and Klein (1926), which 3. Quantum IIb flux vacua 33 postulated a fifth dimension of space-time, invisible to 4. Supersymmetry breaking 35 B. Type IIa flux vacua 38 everyday experience. 1. Qualitative considerations 38 In this picture, all physics is described at a funda- 2. 4d multiplets and K¨ahler potential 39 mental level by a straightforward generalization of gen- 3. Fluxes and superpotential 40 eral relativity to five dimensions, obtained by taking 4. Comments on 10d description 40 the metric tensor g to depend on five-dimensional in- C. Mirror symmetry and new classes of vacua 41 µν 1. A warm-up: The twisted torus 41 dices µ =0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and imposing general covariance in five dimensions. Such a theory allows five-dimensional Minkowski space-time as a solution, a possibility in ev- ident contradiction with experience. However, it also ∗Electronic address: [email protected] allows many other solutions with different or less sym- †Electronic address: [email protected] metry. As a solution which could describe our universe, 2 consider a direct product of four-dimensional Minkowski gravity with a natural extension of the Standard Model, space-time, with a circle of constant periodicity, which we from a single unified theory with no free parameters. denote 2πR. It is easy to check that at distances r>>R, However, at this point, the problem we encountered the gravitational force law reduces to the familar inverse above rears its ugly head. Just like the classical Einstein- square law. Furthermore, at energies E << ~/Rc, all Maxwell equations, the classical supergravity equations quantum mechanical wave functions will be independent are scale invariant. Thus, if we can find any solution of position on the circle, and thus if R is sufficiently small of the type we just described, by rescaling the size R (in 1926, subatomic), the circle will be invisible. of the compactification manifold, we can obtain a one- The point of saying this is that the five dimensional parameter family of solutions, differing only in the value metric gµν , regarded as a field in four dimensions, con- of R. Similarly, by making a rescaling of R with a weak tains additional, non-metric degrees of freedom. In par- dependence on four-dimensional position, one obtains ap- ticular, the components gµ5 transform as a vector field, proximate solutions. Thus, again R corresponds to a which turns out to obey the Maxwell equations in a massless field in four dimensions, which is again in fatal curved background. Thus, one has a unified theory of conflict with observation. gravitation and electromagnetism. In fact, the situation is even worse. Considerations The theory contains one more degree of freedom, the we will discuss show that typical solutions of this type metric component g55, which parameterizes the radius R have not just one but hundreds of parameters, called of the extra-dimensional circle. Since the classical Ein- moduli. Each will lead to a massless scalar field, and stein equations are scale invariant, in the construction as its own potential conflict with observation. In addition, described, there is no preferred value for this radius R. the interaction strength between strings is controlled by Thus, Kaluza and Klein simply postulated a value for it another massless scalar field, which by a long-standing consistent with experimental bounds. quirk of terminology is called the dilaton. Since this field Just like the other metric components, the g55 compo- is present in all string theories and enters directly into nent is a field, which can vary in four-dimensional space- the formulas for observable couplings, many proposals for time in any way consistent with the equations of mo- dealing with the other moduli problems, such as looking tion. We will discuss these equations of motion in detail for special solutions without parameters, founder here. later, but their main salient feature is that they describe a On further consideration, the moduli are tied up with (non-minimally coupled) massless scalar field. We might many other interesting physical questions. The simplest expect such a field to lead to physical effects just as im- of these is just the following: given the claim that all portant as those of the Maxwell field we were trying to of known physics can arise from a fundamental theory explain. Further analysis bears this out, predicting ef- with no free parameters, how do the particular values fects such as new long range forces, or time dependence we observe for the fundamental parameters of physics, of parameters, in direct conflict with observation. such as the electron mass or the fine structure constant, All this would be a historical footnote were it not for actually emerge from within the theory? This question the discovery, which emerged over the period 1975–1985, has always seemed to lie near the heart of the matter and that superstring theory provides a consistent quantum has inspired all sorts of speculations and numerological theory of gravity coupled to matter in ten space-time observations, some verging on the bizarre. dimensions (Green et al., 1987a,b). At energies low com- This question has a clear answer within superstring pared to its fundamental scale (the string tension), this theory, and the moduli are central to this answer. The theory is well described by ten-dimensional supergravity, answer may not be to every reader’s liking, but let us a supersymmetric extension of general relativity coupled come back to this in due course. to Yang-Mills theory. But the nonrenormalizability of To recap, we now have a problem, a proliferation of that theory is cured by the extended nature of the string. massless scalar fields; and a question, the origin of fun- Clearly such a theory is a strong candidate for a higher damental parameters. Suppose we ignore the dynamics dimensional unified theory of the type postulated by of the massless scalar fields for a moment, and simply Kaluza and Klein. Around 1985, detailed arguments freeze the moduli to particular values, in other words re- were made, most notably by Candelas et al. (1985), that strict attention to one of the multi-parameter family of starting from the heterotic superstring theory, one could possible solutions in an ad hoc way. Now, if we carry derive supersymmetric grand unified theories (GUTs) of out the Kaluza-Klein procedure on this definite solution, the general class which, for completely independent rea- we will be able to compute physical predictions, includ- sons, had already been postulated as plausible extensions ing the fundamental parameters. Of course, the results of the Standard Model up to very high energies. This depend on the details of the assumed solution for the ex- construction, the first quasi-realistic string compactifi- tra dimensions of space, and the particular values of the cation, took ten-dimensional space-time to be a direct moduli.

Load more

  66

Copy Link