DOCSLIB.ORG

Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan This document provides a basic blueprint for long-term transportation investment in the Nashua Region to the ~ 2019 to 2045 horizon year 2045.The plan is structured around four major goals, developed through public outreach and coordination Adopted Date TBD with advisory committees, which include Mobility and Accessibility, Quality of Life, System Sustainability and Implementation. Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2019-2045 Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 OVERVIEW OF THE REGION AND THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ............................... 2 OVERVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) ...................................................... 3 Long Range Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives ............................................................................ 4 Mobility ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Quality of Life ........................................................................................................................................ 4 System Sustainability ............................................................................................................................ 5 Implementation .................................................................................................................................... 5 PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS ........................................................................................................................ 7 PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING ........................................................................................................... 8 TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................ 9 TARGETS .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Safety .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Target Development ........................................................................................................................... 12 Target Adoption .................................................................................................................................. 13 State Target Summary ........................................................................................................................ 13 STATE TARGET DETAIL AND MPO COMPARISON .................................................................................... 14 Number of Fatalities ........................................................................................................................... 14 Rate of Fatalities ................................................................................................................................. 15 Number of Serious Injuries ................................................................................................................. 16 Rate of Serious Injuries ....................................................................................................................... 17 Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries ................................................................. 18 Crash Modification Factors for Projects Impact Analysis ................................................................... 19 PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION ..................................................................................................... 19 TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY ....................................................................................................................... 21 ENVIRONMENT AND AIR QUALITY .......................................................................................................... 23 National Ambient Air Quality Standards ............................................................................................. 23 New Hampshire Ozone Status ............................................................................................................ 23 Nashua Carbon Monoxide Status ....................................................................................................... 24 Air Quality - Looking Ahead ................................................................................................................ 24 Carbon Dioxide .................................................................................................................................... 25 WATER QUALITY...................................................................................................................................... 26 i | P a g e Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2019-2045 OPEN SPACE ............................................................................................................................................ 27 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ...................................................................................................................... 28 Poverty ................................................................................................................................................ 28 Minority Populations .......................................................................................................................... 30 Environmental Justice Zones by Census Tract .................................................................................... 31 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS ................................................................................................. 33 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS ............................................................................................................ 35 Summary of the MPO Adopted Public Involvement Process.............................................................. 35 Nashua Region Transportation Survey ............................................................................................... 35 Communications with Municipalities and Stakeholders ..................................................................... 36 FUTURE NEEDS ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 37 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS ....................................................................................... 38 TRAFFIC MODEL FORECASTS ................................................................................................................... 41 Travel Model Methodology ................................................................................................................ 41 2045 No-Build Traffic Forecasts .......................................................................................................... 42 PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS AND PRIORITIES ................................................................................................... 46 TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS ......................................................................................... 49 TEN YEAR PLAN PROJECTS ...................................................................................................................... 50 Bridge Projects .................................................................................................................................... 50 Intersection Improvements ................................................................................................................ 51 Corridor and Subarea Circulation Improvements ............................................................................... 56 Intelligent Transportation Systems Projects ....................................................................................... 58 Pedestrian and Bicycle Projects .......................................................................................................... 59 Capacity Improvements ...................................................................................................................... 60 NASHUA MPO RECOMMENDED FISCALLY CONSTRAINED PROJECTS ......................................................... 65 REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION/OPERATIONAL IMROVEMENTS OF EXISTING FACILITIES ............ 66 Bridge Projects .................................................................................................................................... 66 Railroad Safety Improvements ........................................................................................................... 66 Main Street, Nashua ........................................................................................................................... 67 RECONSTRUCTION & OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................................... 67 NH 13/South Main Street Realignment, Brookline ............................................................................. 67 NH 130 (Broad Street), Nashua ........................................................................................................... 68 Main Street, Nashua ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FY 2017 – FY 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
    FY 2017 – FY 2040 Regional Transportation Plan For the Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Auburn Deerfield Manchester Bedford Francestown New Boston Candia Goffstown Weare Chester Hooksett Windham Derry Londonderry Adopted January 24, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Region ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Transportation .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Authority for the Plan................................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Scope of the Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Technical Approach ................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER II .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Master Plan Update, Merrimack NH
    Merrimack, NH | 2013 Master Plan Update 9. Transportation 9.1 Introduction The Master Plan Update 2002 identified several critical areas of concern relative to existing congestion, transportation deficiencies, and the lack of connectivity within the Town. In addi- tion, the need to create a long-term transportation plan that accommodates mobility within the community for its residents, businesses and visitors and promotes development consis- tent with the Town’s vision was also identified. Key recommended actions from the 2002 report are summarized below with an update on the progress completed to date. Continue to work with the state and regional officials toward implementation of the Manchester Airport Access Road (MAAR) to improve access to the Manchester Airport for Merrimack residents and businesses while also improving access to northern Merrimack’s commercial and industrial areas to the F.E. Everett Turnpike. The MAAR, now formally named Raymond Wieczorek Drive, was completed and opened for public travel in the fall of 2011. The new interchange provides full north and south access between the F.E. Everett Turnpike and US Route 3 in Bedford, just north of the Merrimack town line. This interchange partially filled a gap in the regional transportation system for northern Merrimack residents and businesses where the existing F.E. Everett Turnpike Exit 12 configuration only provides ramps to/from the south. Previously motorists in the northern portion of the Town wishing to travel to/from the Turnpike north would have to travel via US Route 3 to the I-293/NH Route 101 interchange in Bedford to complete this trip or travel south to the Exit 11 interchange.
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire Turnpike System Traffic and Revenue Study
    Submitted to: New Hampshire Department of Transportation New Hampshire Turnpike System Traffic and Revenue Study May 29, 2015 Submitted by: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 603 New York, NY 10121 (this page left intentionally blank) NH Turnpike System Traffic and Revenue Study Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 1 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 3. Description of New Hampshire Turnpike System ................................................ 4 4. Historical Traffic and Revenue ............................................................................ 11 4.1. Historical Toll Transactions and Toll Revenue Trends ................................................. 11 4.2. Toll Transaction Trends ................................................................................................ 12 4.3. Toll Revenue Trends .................................................................................................... 17 4.4. Comparison of Actual Toll Revenues to Recent Projections ........................................ 21 5. Review of Proposed Capital Improvement Program ......................................... 22 6. Review of Historical and Projected Operation, Maintenance, Renewal and Replacement, and Debt Service Expenditures ......................................................... 24 6.1. Toll Processing Costs ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2015-2040
    Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2015-2040 This document provides a basic blueprint for long-term transportation investment in the Nashua Region to the horizon year 2040.The plan is structured around four major goals, developed through public outreach and coordination with advisory committees, which include Mobility and Accessibility, Quality of Life, System Sustainability and Implementation. Adopted December 17, 2014 Image: Amherst Road, Mont Vernon, N.H.(NRPC) Executive Summary ............................................................................3 Environment and Air Quality ....................................................... 37 Goals and Vision .................................................................................3 National Ambient Air Quality Standards .................................. 37 Existing Conditions ..............................................................................6 Nashua Carbon Monoxide Status ............................................ 37 Demographics .................................................................................7 Air Quality - Looking Ahead ..................................................... 38 Senior Population .......................................................................8 Carbon Dioxide ......................................................................... 39 Population Under Age 18 ............................................................9 Water Quality ........................................................................... 40
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Bridge Location Over the Merrimack River in Southern New Hampshire: a Comparison of Site Suitability Assessments
    SELECTION OF BRIDGE LOCATION OVER THE MERRIMACK RIVER IN SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE: A COMPARISON OF SITE SUITABILITY ASSESSMENTS by Mark R. Wimmer A Thesis Presented to the FACULTY OF THE USC GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY) August 2015 Copyright 2015 Mark R. Wimmer ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Foremost, I would like extend my sincere gratitude to my thesis advisor, Dr. Karen Kemp, for without her expertise and guidance, I would have not completed my thesis. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Su Jin Lee and Dr. Katsuhiko (Kirk) Oda for their assistance and tutelage that gave me the building blocks for my research and study. Last but not least, I want to thank my wife and children for their support through all the long nights and missed family time spent on school; without them I could not have made it this far. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vii ABSTRACT viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Study Area 2 1.2 A Methodology for Site Suitability 4 1.2 Research Objective 5 1.3 Outline of the Methodology 6 1.4 Thesis Organization 7 CHAPTER 2: PRIOR STUDIES - OVERVIEW AND RESULTS 9 2.1 Alternative Bridge Location Site Selection Methods 9 2.2 Alternative Bridge Locations 10 2.2.1 NRPC Alternative #1 10 2.2.2 NRPC Alternative #2 11 2.2.3 NRPC Alternative #3 12 2.3 NRPC Site Suitability Analysis 13 CHAPTER 3: IDENTIFICATION OF CRITERIA AND DATA
    [Show full text]
  • Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan
    Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan This document provides a basic blueprint for long-term transportation investment in the Nashua Region to the ~ 2019 to 2045 horizon year 2045.The plan is structured around four major goals, developed through public outreach and coordination Adopted by NRPC on Dec. 19, 2018 as with advisory committees, which include Mobility and Draft Subject to Incorporation of FHWA Accessibility, Quality of Life, System Sustainability and Comments Implementation. 2019 – 2045 Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan This document has been prepared by the Nashua Regional Planning Commission in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration; the New Hampshire Department of Transportation; and the Federal Transit Administration. The contents of the report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation, or the Federal Transit Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 OVERVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ............................................................ 2 OVERVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Hooksett 2020-2030 Master Plan Update
    Town of Hooksett 2020-2030 Master Plan Update TOWN OF HOOKSETT, NEW HAMPSHIRE 2020-2030 MASTER PLAN Community Development Department Town Offices 35 Main Street Hooksett, NH 03106 Phone: 603-268-0279 Fax: 603-485-4423 Staff: Nicholas Williams, Town Planner This document may be viewed on the Town of Hooksett Website at www.hooksett.org HOOKSETT PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Dick Marshall – Chairman _______________________________________ Tom Walsh – Vice-Chairman _______________________________________ David Boutin – Member _______________________________________ Brett Scott – Member _______________________________________ Paul Scarpetti – Member _______________________________________ Matt Reed – Member _______________________________________ Chris Stelmach – Member _______________________________________ Rob Duhaime – Town Council Representative _______________________________________ MASTER PLAN UPDATE STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Dick Marshall Paul Scarpetti Desnise Grafton Matt Reed CONSULTANTS Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Sylvia von Aulock Cameron Prolman Zachary Swick Madeline DiIonno Adam Hlasny Adoption Signatures Certification of Master Plan Adoption HOOKSETT PLANNING BOARD Hooksett, New Hampshire In accordance with New Hampshire RSA 674:4, Master Plan Adoption and Amendment, and New Hampshire RSA 675:6, Method Of Adoption, the Hooksett Planning Board, having held three (3) duly authorized public hearings on the 2020 Hooksett Master Plan on the following dates: ________, 2020; ______, 2020; and ______, 2020; the Board hereby
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2045 Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan
    Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan This document provides a basic blueprint for long-term transportation investment in the Nashua Region to the ~ 2019 to 2045 horizon year 2045.The plan is structured around four major goals, developed through public outreach and coordination Adopted by NRPC on Dec. 19, 2018 with advisory committees, which include Mobility and Accessibility, Quality of Life, System Sustainability and Implementation. 2019 – 2045 Nashua Region Metropolitan Transportation Plan This document has been prepared by the Nashua Regional Planning Commission in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration; the New Hampshire Department of Transportation; and the Federal Transit Administration. The contents of the report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation, or the Federal Transit Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 OVERVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ............................................................ 2 OVERVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) ...................................................... 4
    [Show full text]
  • SNHPC Metropolitan Transportation Plan FY 2021-2045
    2021-2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan FOR THE SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE PLANNING COMMISSION th ADOPTED, JANUARY 26 2021 PAGE | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS 4 LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 THE SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE PLANNING COMMISSION 7 1.2 REGIONAL LAND USE, POPULATION, AND EMPLOYMENT TRENDS 8 1.3 REGIONAL PROJECTS OF INFLUENCE 13 1.4 COVID-19 DISRUPTIONS TO TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITIES IN THE SNHPC REGION 14 1.5 THE SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE PLANNING COMMISSION REGION’S VISION 15 1.6 TRANSPORTATION MODES OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 16 1.7 FEDERALLY DESIGNATED METROPOLITAN PLANNING FACTORS 18 1.8 AUTHORITY OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 19 1.9 TECHNICAL APPROACH TO PLANNING 20 2.0 PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 21 2.1 SAFETY AND SECURITY 21 2.2 EFFICIENCY AND PRESERVATION 21 2.3 LOCAL ECONOMY AND ACCESS 22 2.4 REGIONAL ECONOMY AND CONNECTIVITY 22 2.5 GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY AND TOURISM 22 2.6 RESILIENCY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 22 2.7 LAND USE AND QUALITY OF LIFE 23 2.8 AUTHENTIC ENGAGEMENT 23 2.9 TRACKING PROGRESS TOWARDS GOALS 23 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 24 3.1 THE ROADWAY NETWORK 24 3.2 TRANSIT FACILITIES AND SERVICE 31 3.3 FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION 37 3.4 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 39 3.5 INTERMODAL FACILITIES 42 3.6 NEW HAMPSHIRE’S RAIL SYSTEM 46 3.7 LAND USE & CLIMATE CHANGE 48 PAGE | 2 4.0 TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS 49 4.1 THE REGIONAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL 49 4.2 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES (TAZ) 50 4.3 FORECASTING MODEL INPUTS AND VALIDATION 53 4.4 BASE YEAR (2015) TRAVEL DEMAND FORECAST
    [Show full text]
  • Town Council Meeting Minutes
    Approved: October 23, 2019 Posted: October 24, 2019 Town Council Meeting Minutes Thursday September 26, 2019 at 7:00 PM, in the Matthew Thornton Room Chairman Koenig called the meeting of the Town Council to order at 7:00 p.m. Present at the meeting were Vice Chairman Boyd, Councilor Harrington, Councilor Healey, Councilor Rothhaus, Councilor Woods, Town Manager, Eileen Cabanel, and Assistant Town Manager/Finance Director Paul Micali. Councilor Albert was excused. Pledge of Allegiance Chairman Koenig led in the Pledge of Allegiance. Announcements Regular meetings of the Town Council will be conducted on Thursday, October 10th and 24th at 7:00 p.m. in the Matthew Thornton Room. The Thursday evening hours for the summer season at the Transfer Station have ended. The hours of operation are Tuesday through Saturday, 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. The November New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) Public Hearing will be on air emissions for air stacks followed by the topic of remediation. The Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS) will conduct a meeting (date not yet determined) to discuss what the lowered number means for the average person. Comments from the Press and Public – None Recognitions, Resignations and Retirements 1. Recognition of Retirement of Town Employee Submitted by Human Resources Coordinator Sharon Marunicz The Town Council will present an award to Solid Waste Foreman Steven S. Doumas in recognition of his retirement after 30 years of full-time service with the Town of Merrimack Solid Waste Division of the Public Works Department. The engraved rocking chair will not arrive in time for the meeting, but will be shipped as soon as it is ready.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE SPACE ±4,565 SF 5 COMMERCE PARK NORTH Bedford, NH
    FOR LEASE OFFICE SPACE ±4,565 SF 5 COMMERCE PARK NORTH Bedford, NH PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CBRE/New England is pleased to present the availability of 5 Commerce Park North in Bedford, NH for lease. The available space consists of 4,565 SF of a mix of hard wall offices and open area for cubes. With convenient access to points north, south, east and west, 5 Commerce Park North is an ideal location for many companies. The building is strategically located less than two miles from Interstate 293, Route 101, the F.E. Everett Turnpike and within 20 minutes of the Massachusetts border. Nearby amenities include hotels, dining, retail, salons, fitness and the Manchester-Boston Regional Airport. FEATURES + First class office space + Short distance to amenities + ±4,565 SF on the second floor + Easy highway access CONTACT US ROGER DIEKER MICHAEL TAMPOSI CHRIS HEALEY First Vice President Vice President Senior Associate +1 603 540 8315 +1 603 315 4348 +1 603 475 1235 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.cbre.com/manchester CB Richard Ellis – N.E. Partners, LP, a CBRE Joint Venture FOR LEASE OFFICE SPACE 5 COMMERCE PARK NORTH ±4,565 SF Bedford, NH PROPERTY FEATURES + Building Size ±41,813 SF + Zoning Commercial-2 + Available SF ±4,565 SF + Parking Ratio 3.9/1,000 SF + Year Built 1986 + Access Route I01 + Stories Two + Lease Rate $18.00/SF Gross PROPERTY LOCATION Downtown Manchester 93 293 Manchester-Boston Regional Airport 3 5 COMMERCE PARK 3 F.E. EVERETT TURNPIKE SOUTH RIVER ROAD AIRPORT ACCESS ROAD - RAYMOND WIECZOREK DRIVE 2 WALL STREET | MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03101 | +1 603 626 0036 | FAX +1 603 626 0249 © 2016 CB Richard Ellis – N.E.
    [Show full text]