Rapid Biodiversity Assessment of Halcrow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rapid Biodiversity Assessment of Halcrow E1751 RAPID BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT OF HALCROW AND GUYSUCO CONSERVANCIES Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL R EPORT Example: Densely populated JANUARY 2006 wooded reefs of low-medium height Photo: W. Prince Environmental Management Consultants Public Disclosure Authorized 60 Area H Ogle East Coast Demerara Cover photos: Waldyke Prince and Dr. Gary Clarke Top: Yellow Oriole Icterus nigrogularis Spectacled Caiman Caiman crocodilus Mabuya Skink Mabuya mabuya White Leaf Frog Hyla leucophyllata Bottom: Aerial view of the Skeldon Water Path bordering the Guysuco Conservancy Page 2 of 47 CONTENTS PAGES Executive Summary 6 1. INTRODUCTION 8 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site 9 2.2 Schedule of Fieldwork 9 2.3 Vegetation Surveys 9 2.4 Faunal Surveys 11 2.5 Sampling Protocol 12 2.6 Collection of specimens 12 2.7 Photography 13 2.8 Data Analysis 13 3. RESULTS & DISCUSSION 3.1 Vegetation 14 3.2 Invertebrate fauna 19 3.3 Fish Fauna 20 3.4 Amphibian Fauna 21 3.5 Reptile Fauna 23 3.6 Mammal Fauna 24 3.7 Avifauna 26 3.8 Key Species and Habitats of Conservation Importance 32 3.9 Indicator Species 32 3.10 Summary of Flora and Fauna Species Diversity 32 3.11 Shift in Species Composition 33 4. CONSTRAINTS & LIMITATIONS 34 5. MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Biodiversity monitoring 35 5.2 Hunting 35 5.3 Cattle Ranching 35 5.4 Fire Control 35 5.5 Management of Watershed/Catchment Area 35 6. LITERATURE CITED 36 APPENDIX I Terms of Reference 37 APPENDIX II Schedule of Activities and Fieldwork 39 APPENDIX III Avifauna Transect Monitoring Datasheet 40 APPENDIX IV Images 42 Page 3 of 47 Table 1. Composition of Assessment Team, Team Member Expertise and Roles 9 Table 2. Geographical location of transects 11 Table 3. List of Flora Species recorded in the Halcrow and GUYSUCO Conservancies 14 Table 4. Frequency of Woody Species above 5cm dbh in all Halcrow Conservancy Transects 16 Table 5. Frequency of Woody Plant Species frequency in Halcrow Conservancy Transects 16 Table 6. Understorey Species < 5cm dbh occurring in each quadrat in the Halcrow Conservancy 17 Table 7. Frequency of Woody Plant Species in the GUYSUCO Conservancy Transect 18 Table 8. Understorey Species < 5cm dbh occurring in each quadrat in the GUYSUCO Conservancy 19 Table 9. Invertebrate Fauna of the Conservancies 19 Table 10. Fish Species Diversity and Abundance in the Skeldon Water Path and surrounding Waterways 20 Table 11. Amphibian Species Diversity and Abundance in the GUYSUCO and Halcrow Conservancies 22 Table 12. Reptile Species Diversity and Abundance in the GUYSUCO and Halcrow Conservancies 23 Table 13. Mammal species diversity and abundance recorded during transect surveys, time searches and opportunistic observations in the GUYSUCO and Halcrow conservancies 25 Table 14. Bat Species Diversity and Abundance in the GUYSUCO and Halcrow Conservancies 26 Table 15. Avifauna Species Diversity and Abundance in the GUYSUCO and Halcrow Conservancies 26 Page 4 of 47 ACRONYMS GUYSUCO Guyana Sugar Corporation EMC Environmental Management Consultants GPS Global Positioning System CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature NTFP Non-Timber Forest Species Page 5 of 47 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Guyana Sugar Corporation has agreed to manage the Halcrow and GUYSUCO conservancies, Skeldon Estate, to secure the water supply needed for a new sugar factory and expanded cane cultivation and also to conserve the biological diversity of the conservancies. A biodiversity assessment team was contracted to survey the flora and fauna within the Halcrow and GUYSUCO conservancies, collect baseline data on the presence, distribution and relative abundance of species, and take special note of key species and habitats of conservation interest. In total the assessment team conducted 17 days of fieldwork from 14th to 30th November 2005. Three broad vegetation types were found to exist in the conservancies, with one intermediate type: 1) densely populated wooded reefs of low-medium height, 2) low-grass savannah, 3) papyrus-dominated wet savannah, and 4) sparsely wooded savannah with isolated trees and/or tree islands (intermediate). In total 56 plant species were recorded. Vegetation types and plant species assemblages were similar between the two conservancies. Within each of the vegetation types species assemblages were fairly homogenous and were typical of secondary or disturbed wet marsh habitats. The vegetation is disturbed due to the area historically and currently being used as cattle pasture. Also there is evidence that the grassland (and forest) is subject to burning in the dry season either naturally or by man. No plant species of national or regional significance or global conservation importance were found. In total 481 fish belonging to 20 species and 9 families were recorded. Perch-like fishes (perciformes) and characids (characiformes) dominated the fish fauna. The main species caught by local fishermen to sell for human consumption (of economic importance) were the hassa Hoplosternum littorale, common pattwa Cichlasoma bimaculatum, and the huri Hoplias marabalicus. In total 113 amphibians belonging to 10 species and three families were recorded: one toad species (Bufonidae), six species of tree frogs (Hylidae), and three species of rain frogs (Leptodactylidae). The ubiquitous cane toad Bufo marinus dominated the amphibian community. In total 69 reptiles belonging to 12 species and seven families were recorded: one caiman species, six lizard species, four snake species and one tortoise species. Spectacled caiman Caiman crocodiles, the giant ameiva Ameiva ameiva, and the common tegu Tupinambis teguixin dominated the reptile community. In total 93 volant and non-volant mammals belonging to 13 species were recorded. Sixty non-volant mammals belonging to eight species and six families were recorded. The most commonly observed non- volant mammals were the squirrel monkey Saimiri scuireus and red rumped agouti Dasyprocta leporina. Five bats species were recorded during surveys and mist netting, one emballonurid, the proboscis bat Rhynconycteris naso, and four phyllostomid species (leaf-nosed bats) bats, which were captured in mist nets. In total 2797 birds belonging to 119 species and 38 families were recorded and we estimate that the true species richness for the avifauna is around 140 species. The smooth billed ani Crotophaga ani, brown- throated parakeet Aratinga pertinax and the great kiskadee Pitangus sulpharatus dominated the avifauna community. All of the faunal species recorded have a wide geographical distribution, are relatively common, and are tolerant of a wide range of habitats, including disturbed habitats. Plant species in the conservancies also have a wide geographical distribution and are not uncommon in Guyana. Only three animal species of conservation importance were recorded. The yellow-footed tortoise Geochelone denticulata is listed by IUCN as Vulnerable and in the region it is harvested at an unsustainable rate for human consumption. We observed signs indicating the presence of jaguar Panthera onca, a species listed as Near Threatened by IUCN. Finally, we recorded the blue-cheeked amazon parrot Page 6 of 47 Amazona dufresnia, which is listed by IUCN as Near Threatened. The assessment team surveyed the area for West Indian manatee Trichechus manatus, listed by IUCN as Vulnerable, and interviewed local people. No manatees were observed and local’s state that they have not been seen for many years and are likely to have been extirpated (hunted out) from the area. In this report a number of recommendations are made as to how the conservancies could be managed to conserve biodiversity, including the need for biodiversity monitoring. It is suggested that birds be used as indicator species for biodiversity monitoring as they are ecologically diverse, relatively common in the conservancies, well studied, relatively easy to sample and identify, and able to respond rapidly to environmental changes. Page 7 of 47 1. INTRODUCTION The Guyana Sugar Corporation (GUYSUCO) is building a larger, modern sugar factory at Skeldon, Corentyne Berbice, Guyana. Sugar cane cultivation will be expanded to supply the capacity of the new factory. The new factory and expanded sugar cane cultivation will require a constant supply of fresh water. Therefore GUYSUCO has agreed to manage two adjacent conservancies, which are state lands under long-term management by GUYSUCO, to secure the water supply needed and conserve biodiversity. Dams are being built around the conservancies that will lead to an increase in water level within the conservancies and the creation of a mini-reservoir with a total surface area estimated to be approximately 1520ha and a maximum depth of 1m (Anon. 2002). The mini-reservoir will thus cover the entire 1400 ha of the GUYSUCO conservancy and small fraction of the Halcrow conservancy, approximately 120ha of 6000ha (2%). Water will be drawn from these conservancies to irrigate new areas under sugar cane cultivation. In order to manage the conservancies for biodiversity conservation there is a need to document the flora and fauna. EMC was contracted to conduct a Rapid Biological Assessment (RBA) of both Halcrow and GUYSUCO conservancies (Appendix I). The EMC biodiversity assessment team surveyed the flora and fauna within habitat types encompassed by both conservancies, collecting baseline data on the presence, distribution and relative abundance of species and taking
Recommended publications
  • Inside: Idaea Asceta (Prout) (Geometridae), New to the U.S
    ________________________________________________________________________________________ Volume 53, Number 3 Fall 2011 www.lepsoc.org ________________________________________________________________________________________ Inside: Idaea asceta (Prout) (Geometridae), new to the U.S. Lepidoptera conserva- tion under a changing climate Karl Jordan Award win- ner: Don Lafontaine Life history of Leona’s Little Blue Tiputini Biological Sta- tion, Ecuador Late Season trip to the Richardson Mountains Membership Updates, The Mailbag, Marketplace... ... and more! ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Contents ________________________________________________________www.lepsoc.org A Late Season Trip to the Richardson Mountains ____________________________________ Michael Leski. ............................................................................................ 75 Volume 53, Number 3 Report on the Southern Lepidoptersists’ Society and Association Fall 2011 for Tropical Lepidoptera Meeting 2011 The Lepidopterists’ Society is a non-profit ed- Jacqueline Y. Miller. ............................................................................. 78 ucational and scientific organization. The ob- Idaea asceta (Prout) (Geometridae: Sterrhinae) from Texas, new ject of the Society, which was formed in May to the North American fauna 1947 and formally constituted in December Charles V. Covell. ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Vogelliste Venezuela
    Vogelliste Venezuela Datum: www.casa-vieja-merida.com (c) Beobachtungstage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Birdlist VENEZUELA copyrightBeobachtungsgebiete: Henri Pittier Azulita / Catatumbo La Altamira St Domingo Paramo Los Llanos Caura Sierra de Imataca Sierra de Lema + Gran Sabana Sucre Berge und Kueste Transfers Andere - gesehen gesehen an wieviel Tagen TINAMIFORMES: Tinamidae - Steißhühner 0 1 Tawny-breasted Tinamou Nothocercus julius Gelbbrusttinamu 0 2 Highland Tinamou Nothocercus bonapartei Bergtinamu 0 3 Gray Tinamou Tinamus tao Tao 0 4 Great Tinamou Tinamus major Großtinamu x 0 5 White-throated Tinamou Tinamus guttatus Weißkehltinamu 0 6 Cinereous Tinamou Crypturellus cinereus Grautinamu x x 0 7 Little Tinamou Crypturellus soui Brauntinamu x x x 0 8 Tepui Tinamou Crypturellus ptaritepui Tepuitinamu by 0 9 Brown Tinamou Crypturellus obsoletus Kastanientinamu 0 10 Undulated Tinamou Crypturellus undulatus Wellentinamu 0 11 Gray-legged Tinamou Crypturellus duidae Graufußtinamu 0 12 Red-legged Tinamou Crypturellus erythropus Rotfußtinamu birds-venezuela.dex x 0 13 Variegated Tinamou Crypturellus variegatus Rotbrusttinamu x x x 0 14 Barred Tinamou Crypturellus casiquiare Bindentinamu 0 ANSERIFORMES: Anatidae - Entenvögel 0 15 Horned Screamer Anhima cornuta Hornwehrvogel x 0 16 Northern Screamer Chauna chavaria Weißwangen-Wehrvogel x 0 17 White-faced Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna viduata Witwenpfeifgans x 0 18 Black-bellied Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna autumnalis Rotschnabel-Pfeifgans x 0 19 Fulvous Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna bicolor
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil's Eastern Amazonia
    The loud and impressive White Bellbird, one of the many highlights on the Brazil’s Eastern Amazonia 2017 tour (Eduardo Patrial) BRAZIL’S EASTERN AMAZONIA 8/16 – 26 AUGUST 2017 LEADER: EDUARDO PATRIAL This second edition of Brazil’s Eastern Amazonia was absolutely a phenomenal trip with over five hundred species recorded (514). Some adjustments happily facilitated the logistics (internal flights) a bit and we also could explore some areas around Belem this time, providing some extra good birds to our list. Our time at Amazonia National Park was good and we managed to get most of the important targets, despite the quite low bird activity noticed along the trails when we were there. Carajas National Forest on the other hand was very busy and produced an overwhelming cast of fine birds (and a Giant Armadillo!). Caxias in the end came again as good as it gets, and this time with the novelty of visiting a new site, Campo Maior, a place that reminds the lowlands from Pantanal. On this amazing tour we had the chance to enjoy the special avifauna from two important interfluvium in the Brazilian Amazon, the Madeira – Tapajos and Xingu – Tocantins; and also the specialties from a poorly covered corner in the Northeast region at Maranhão and Piauí states. Check out below the highlights from this successful adventure: Horned Screamer, Masked Duck, Chestnut- headed and Buff-browed Chachalacas, White-crested Guan, Bare-faced Curassow, King Vulture, Black-and- white and Ornate Hawk-Eagles, White and White-browed Hawks, Rufous-sided and Russet-crowned Crakes, Dark-winged Trumpeter (ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • COLOMBIA 2019 Ned Brinkley Departments of Vaupés, Chocó, Risaralda, Santander, Antioquia, Magdalena, Tolima, Atlántico, La Gu
    COLOMBIA 2019 Ned Brinkley Departments of Vaupés, Chocó, Risaralda, Santander, Antioquia, Magdalena, Tolima, Atlántico, La Guajira, Boyacá, Distrito Capital de Bogotá, Caldas These comments are provided to help independent birders traveling in Colombia, particularly people who want to drive themselves to birding sites rather than taking public transportation and also want to book reservations directly with lodgings and reserves rather than using a ground agent or tour company. Many trip reports provide GPS waypoints for navigation. I used GoogleEarth/ Maps, which worked fine for most locations (not for El Paujil reserve). I paid $10/day for AT&T to hook me up to Claro, Movistar, or Tigo through their Passport program. Others get a local SIM card so that they have a Colombian number (cheaper, for sure); still others use GooglePhones, which provide connection through other providers with better or worse success, depending on the location in Colombia. For transportation, I used a rental 4x4 SUV to reach places with bad roads but also, in northern Colombia, a subcompact rental car as far as Minca (hiked in higher elevations, with one moto-taxi to reach El Dorado lodge) and for La Guajira. I used regular taxis on few occasions. The only roads to sites for Fuertes’s Parrot and Yellow-eared Parrot could not have been traversed without four-wheel drive and high clearance, and this is important to emphasize: vehicles without these attributes would have been useless, or become damaged or stranded. Note that large cities in Colombia (at least Medellín, Santa Marta, and Cartagena) have restrictions on driving during rush hours with certain license plate numbers (they base restrictions on the plate’s final numeral).
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Birding Tour Report
    Brazil: The Pantanal and Amazon 25 July – 6 August 2010 Agami Heron Tour leader: Nick Athanas Report and photos by Nick Athanas All photos were taken on the tour With the incredible diversity of the pristine Amazon forests of Cristalino and the unmatched wildlife spectacle of the Pantanal, combined with a series of great lodges, it is impossible not to have a great time on this tour. I never get tired of it, and each year brings different highlights and new surprises. The amorous Crested Eagles at Cristalino may have been the “bird of the trip”, but the bathing pools certainly were the most memorable, attracting nearly 30 shy species, most of which we never would have seen otherwise. As usual, the mind-blowing Hyacinth Macaws stole the show in the Pantanal, but the experience of being here can never be described by a list of birds. It’s the whole feel of the place, where there is something cool to see pretty much anywhere you lay your eyes, that makes it so special. Amazingly, a cold snap hit the Pantanal while we were there and the normally furnace-like temperatures dropped lower and lower, shockingly getting down to the upper 40’s F early one morning. Tropical Birding www.tropicalbirding.com 1 I never imagined I would be sipping caipirinhas while trying to stand as close as possible to a roaring campfire while nighthawks and skimmers flew by the river next to us. It was so pleasant at mid-day you could be outside non-stop instead of taking shelter in air-conditioned rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 Version Available for Download From
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 14, 3rd edition). A 4th edition of the Handbook is in preparation and will be available in 2009. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Beatriz de Aquino Ribeiro - Bióloga - Analista Ambiental / [email protected], (95) Designation date Site Reference Number 99136-0940. Antonio Lisboa - Geógrafo - MSc. Biogeografia - Analista Ambiental / [email protected], (95) 99137-1192. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade - ICMBio Rua Alfredo Cruz, 283, Centro, Boa Vista -RR. CEP: 69.301-140 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinators in Peril: a Systematic Status Review of North American
    POLLINATORS in Peril A systematic status review of North American and Hawaiian native bees Kelsey Kopec & Lori Ann Burd • Center for Biological Diversity • February 2017 Executive Summary hile the decline of European honeybees in the United States and beyond has been well publicized in recent years, the more than 4,000 species of native bees in North W America and Hawaii have been much less documented. Although these native bees are not as well known as honeybees, they play a vital role in functioning ecosystems and also provide more than $3 billion dollars in fruit-pollination services each year just in the United States. For this first-of-its-kind analysis, the Center for Biological Diversity conducted a systematic review of the status of all 4,337 North American and Hawaiian native bees. Our key findings: • Among native bee species with sufficient data to assess (1,437), more than half (749) are declining. • Nearly 1 in 4 (347 native bee species) is imperiled and at increasing risk of extinction. • For many of the bee species lacking sufficient population data, it’s likely they are also declining or at risk of extinction. Additional research is urgently needed to protect them. • A primary driver of these declines is agricultural intensification, which includes habitat destruction and pesticide use. Other major threats are climate change and urbanization. These troubling findings come as a growing body of research has revealed that more than 40 percent of insect pollinators globally are highly threatened, including many of the native bees critical to unprompted crop and wildflower pollination across the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Characteristics of Characid Fish Species (Teleostei
    Reproductive characteristics of characid fish species (Teleostei... 469 Reproductive characteristics of characid fish species (Teleostei, Characiformes) and their relationship with body size and phylogeny Marco A. Azevedo Setor de Ictiologia, Museu de Ciências Naturais, Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Dr. Salvador França, 1427, 90690-000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. ([email protected]) ABSTRACT. In this study, I investigated the reproductive biology of fish species from the family Characidae of the order Characiformes. I also investigated the relationship between reproductive biology and body weight and interpreted this relationship in a phylogenetic context. The results of the present study contribute to the understanding of the evolution of the reproductive strategies present in the species of this family. Most larger characid species and other characiforms exhibit a reproductive pattern that is generally characterized by a short seasonal reproductive period that lasts one to three months, between September and April. This is accompanied by total spawning, an extremely high fecundity, and, in many species, a reproductive migration. Many species with lower fecundity exhibit some form of parental care. Although reduction in body size may represent an adaptive advantage, it may also require evolutionary responses to new biological problems that arise. In terms of reproduction, smaller species have a tendency to reduce the number of oocytes that they produce. Many small characids have a reproductive pattern similar to that of larger characiforms. On the other hand they may also exhibit a range of modifications that possibly relate to the decrease in body size and the consequent reduction in fecundity.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Fish Assemblages in Flooded Forest Versus Floating Meadows Habitats of an Upper Amazon Floodplain (Pacaya Samiria National Reserve, Peru)
    COMPARISON OF FISH ASSEMBLAGES IN FLOODED FOREST VERSUS FLOATING MEADOWS HABITATS OF AN UPPER AMAZON FLOODPLAIN (PACAYA SAMIRIA NATIONAL RESERVE, PERU) By SANDRA BIBIANA CORREA A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Sandra Bibiana Correa To my parents and my family. During the course of my life their love and belief in my potential encouraged me to keep going and achieve my dreams. They supported me in all of my decisions even when they separated us for long periods of time. I also dedicate this thesis to Michael Goulding who inspired me to study Amazonian fishes and who is a pioneer in showing their beauty and fragility to the world. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support and commitment of my supervisory committee chair (Dr. James S. Albert) and my committee members (Dr. Lauren J. Chapman and Dr. William G.R. Crampton). All of them put lots of energy and time into the development of different aspects of this work. I thank James and Will for the outstanding time we spent in Peru during the field work that was the basis for this thesis. They were also crucial during the writing stage, and I enjoyed great discussions on Amazonian fish natural history and ecology. Lauren was my main support during the data analysis process. Without her, many of the results presented in this thesis may not have come out. I also want to thank my field assistant; B.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Overlapping Climatic Niches and Biogeographic Barriers Explain Disjunct Distributions of Continental Urania Moths
    a Frontiers of Biogeography 2021, 13.2, e52142 Frontiers of Biogeography RESEARCH ARTICLE the scientific journal of the International Biogeography Society Non-overlapping climatic niches and biogeographic barriers explain disjunct distributions of continental Urania moths Claudia Nuñez-Penichet1* , Marlon E. Cobos1 , and Jorge Soberón1 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, Kansas, 66045 USA. *Correspondence: Claudia Nuñez-Penichet, [email protected] Abstract Highlights Larvae of Urania moths feed exclusively on Omphalea plants, • Using novel methods, we rejected the hypothesis that which are widely distributed in the Neotropics. However, the niches of the moths overlap when considering the distributions of the two Urania species in this region climatic conditions available in accessible areas. are disjunct. This distributional pattern could derive from the presence of the Andes, but it could also be related to • We explored for the first time the possibility of using differences in ecological niches, the presence of negative past environmental scenarios when performing interactions, or the absence of conditions that can only be analyses of niche overlap in environmental space. observed at a habitat level. We tested whether differences in the ecological niches of continentalUrania moths play a • We found that the Andean mountain range and role in their disjunct distribution. Using species records and ecoregions associated can be the major factors climatic variables, we characterized the ecological niches maintaining the disjoint distribution of continental of Urania moths and their host plants and analyzed the Urania moths. overlap of the moths’ niches. Using ecoregions as a proxy • of habitat-level environmental conditions, we explored the Our findings contribute to understanding the role of host plant availability on the moth distributions.
    [Show full text]