DOCSLIB.ORG

YOUTH-LED COMMUNITY ORGANIZING This Page Intentionally Left Blank Youth-Led Community Organizing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
YOUTH-LED COMMUNITY ORGANIZING This Page Intentionally Left Blank Youth-Led Community Organizing YOUTH-LED COMMUNITY ORGANIZING This page intentionally left blank Youth-Led Community Organizing Theory and Action MELVIN DELGADO LEE STAPLES 1 2008 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright # 2008 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Delgado, Melvin. Youth-led community organizing : theory and action / Melvin Delgado and Lee Staples. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN: 978-0-19-518276-7 1. Youth movement. 2. Youth in development. 3. Youth development. 4. Community organization. 5. Young volunteers in community development. 6. Social action. I. Staples, Lee. II. Title. HN19.D35 2008 361.20835—dc22 2006100993 Epigraph extracted from Andrew Malekoff’s want to make waves Reprinted with permission from Families in Society (www.familiesinsociety.org), published by the Alliance for Children and Families. 135798642 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper This book is dedicated to Denise, Laura, and Barbara (Melvin Delgado) Louise, Josh, and Becca (Lee Staples) This page intentionally left blank want to make waves want to make waves want to jump in want to make some waves want to make waves want to make waves want to get wet want to make some waves want to make waves. This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Sara Perks, Patricia Soung, Alison Conway, Rebekah Gowler, Suzanne Hogan, Yi-Chin Chen and Youth 1st in Jackson Square, Boston (with particular thanks to Gian Gonzalez and Leo Peguero), and the following external reviewers of the initial book draft: Barry Checkoway (University of Michigan), Ben Kirshner (University of Color- ado), Laurie Ross (Clark University), and Carmen Sirianni (Brandeis Uni- versity). This page intentionally left blank Contents Part I Setting the Context 1 Overview of Youth-Led Community Organizing 3 2 Social and Economic Justice Foundation 23 3 Overview of Community Organizing, Youth-Led Field, and Youth-Led Organizing 41 Part II Conceptual Foundation for Youth-Led Community Organizing 4 Guiding Principles and Analytical Framework 75 5 Participatory Democracy 95 6 Leadership Development 111 7 Recruitment, Screening, Preparation, and Support of Youth-Led Community Organizers 127 8 Crosscutting Theoretical and Practice Themes 147 Part III A View and Lessons from the Field 9 Youth First in Jackson Square! (¡Jovenes Primero!) 175 10 Challenges Inherent in Youth-Led Organizing 194 11 Epilogue 213 References 219 Index 249 This page intentionally left blank Part I Setting the Context Today’s youth are coming of age in a complex world im- pacted by global forces. However, they generally feel disenfranchised from socio-political processes. ...Youths may turn to social action to speak out and effect change in relation to issues touching their lives. —Lombardo, Zakus, and Skinner, Youth Social Action (2002) This page intentionally left blank 1 Overview of Youth-Led Community Organizing Youth organizing gives young people the po- tential to exercise power to affect key policy decisions and create proactive new realities. —YouthAction, Why Youth Organizing? (1998) There is no nation on earth that can afford to neglect its youth and still hope to play a viable role in a global economy and meet the social and educa- tional needs of its citizens. However, there also is no nation that will pub- licly acknowledge that it systematically and purposefully marginalizes its youth. Rhetoric must be separated from reality and actions, as in the case of the United States. A review of any standard statistic on child/youth well- being would find the United States far from being a world leader in its treatment of this population group (Males 2004). A nation that systemati- cally neglects its youth must be prepared to invest considerable sums of money in remedial services and correctional supervision, both now and in the future. These resources, in turn, can better be spent as social capital investment, helping to prepare youth to assume contributing roles in society (Tienda and Wilson 2002a, b). The price that a nation pays for not constructively engaging and sup- porting its youth is ultimately far greater than what any natural disaster or armed conflict can possibly extract from its coffers (Jenkins 2001; Rizzini, Barker, and Cassaniga 2002). But the true cost cannot be measured simply in monetary standards, as some governments are prone to do. The social and political consequences far exceed any financial costs (Mangum and Waldeck 1997). Such nations must be prepared to have youth rebel under 4 SETTING THE CONTEXT dire circumstances or organize to change existing conditions (Anderson, Bernaldo, and David 2004; Welton and Wolf 2001). Both outcomes have tremendous implications for current and future generations. Further, dis- investments in young people effectively serve to divide a nation along age groups, which can compound other social relations based upon ethnicity, race, sexual orientation, class, and religion. To say that the world around us is changing dramatically would be a serious understatement. There are few, if any, countries in the world where this statement does not apply, including our own. The United States has experienced significant demographic, technological, economic, and political changes in the past decade that have tied it more closely to the rest of the world. For example, a remarkable increase in the number of newcomers has fundamentally altered the composition of the nation’s population (Levitt 2001). These new Americans have had a propensity to settle in cities, par- ticularly on both coasts, essentially reshaping these geographic areas by making them much more diverse in character (Delgado, Jones, and Rohani 2005). This dramatic increase in newcomers, particularly those who are undocumented, has become a major political issue that threatens to further divide a nation that is already fractured along a variety of focal social, economic, and political lines. The United States has also witnessed significant structural changes in its economy, reflecting growth in the service sector, increased prominence of communication and information technology, and the decline of manufac- turing. Employment in the industrial sector, or in ‘‘skilled trades’’ that historically enabled members of immigrant groups and low-income youth of color lacking college degrees to achieve relatively swift economic success, is increasingly much more limited. The remaining service-sector jobs that are available usually offer few opportunities for career advancement, often trapping newcomers and other members of groups of color in low-paid, ‘‘dead-end’’ positions (Bartik 2001; Moss and Tilly 2001; Newman 1999). Consequently, youth sharing a particular socio-demographic profile are increasingly marginalized in this society. At the same time as these demographic shifts have been occurring, the number of youth in American society, particularly adolescents, has grown at a rapid pace. This phenomenon also has played a prominent role in helping to shape day-to-day life as well as social policies (Damon and Gregory 2003; Delgado 2000, 2002; Tienda and Wilson 2002a). The number of youth aged 10 to 19 years increased dramatically between 1995 (37 mil- lion) and 2000 (almost 40 million). According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2000), it is projected that youth under the age of 18 will increase an addi- tional 7 million to 77.6 million by the year 2020. The population under the age of 18 has increased from 62.9 percent in 1978 to 72.4 percent in 2000 (Lopez 2002). Overall, there is nearly an even split along gender lines, with males accounting for 51 percent and females for 49 percent of that age cohort (U.S. OVERVIEW OF YOUTH-LED COMMUNITY ORGANIZING 5 Department of Health and Services, 2002). However, when gender is broken down into ethnic categories, the discrepancy between males and females is greater and has a history of greater fluctuation. African-American/blacks’ gender breakdown is approximately 54 percent female and 46 percent male, with the Latino youth population being approximately 47 percent female and 53 percent male; nonwhite Latinos, in turn, are nearly evenly split at 50 percent for each gender (Lopez 2002). Diversity among youth becomes a factor to consider alongside numerical increases, particularly in urban areas. In 2000, it was estimated that 1.3 million immigrants entered the United States (Immigration Update 2002). Over the past ten years, 43 percent of the nation’s population growth was attributed to immigration (Bayer and Bonilla 2001). Currently, the break- down of youth under the age of 18 by race is 64 percent white, 16 percent Latino, 15 percent African-American/black, 4 percent Asian/Pacific Is- lander, and 1 percent Native American (ChildStats.gov 2001). The amount of all children under the age of 18 living in poverty is 16 per- cent with great variation by race and ethnicity: 9 percent of white children, 33 percent of African-American/black children, and 30 percent of Latino children were living below the poverty level in 1999 (ChildStats.gov 2001). According to O’Hare and Mather (2003), the number of children living in severely distressed urban neighborhoods increased by 18 percent between 1990 and 2000: Of the 5.6 million children growing up in severely distressed neighbor- hoods, 55 percent are black, and 29 percent are Hispanic.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women's Leadership As a Route to Greater Empowerment
    WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AS A ROUTE TO GREATER EMPOWERMENT DESKTOP STUDY OCTOBER 30, 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Mona Lena Krook, Darcy Ashman, Layla Moughari and Milad Pournik of Management Systems International. WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AS A ROUTE TO GREATER EMPOWERMENT DESKTOP STUDY Management Systems International Corporate Offices 200 12th Street South Arlington, VA 22202, USA Tel: + 1 703 979 7100 / Fax: +1 703 979 7101 Contracted under IQC No: AID-OAA-I-10-00002, Task Order No. AID-OAA-TO-13-00046 USAID Contracting Officer’s Representative: Julie Denham, DRG Center DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................................................................. II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 KEY FINDINGS OF THE DESKTOP STUDY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE PROGRAMMING .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria for Standing in Local and Regional Elections
    28th SESSION Strasbourg, 24-26 March 2015 CG/2015(28)7FINAL 26 March 2015 Criteria for standing in local and regional elections Governance Committee Co-rapporteurs:1 Oleksii HONCHARENKO, Ukraine (R, SOC) and Viacheslav ROGOV, Russian Federation (L, ILDG) Resolution 382 (2015) .............................................................................................................................2 Recommendation 375 (2015) ..................................................................................................................3 Explanatory memorandum .......................................................................................................................6 Summary The right to stand for election at local or regional level is a key component of local and regional democracy. While there needs to be some regulation to weed out spurious candidates, the health of territorial democracy depends on the greatest possible proportion of the electorate being able to stand for election. The rapporteurs believe that there remain too many restrictions on standing for local and regional elections. The increase in mobility in Europe is raising expectations and highlighting the drawbacks of maintaining practices and regulations that are overly restrictive in this respect. Governments are invited to review their legislation with a view to removing unnecessary restrictions on standing for election. The Congress therefore asks its committees to work with the Venice Commission in drawing up a supplement to the Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters to address the issue of criteria for standing in local and regional elections. 1 L: Chamber of Local Authorities / R: Chamber of Regions EPP/CCE: European People’s Party Group in the Congress SOC: Socialist Group ILDG: Independent and Liberal Democrat Group ECR: European Conservatives and Reformists Group NR: Members not belonging to a political group of the Congress CG/2015(28)7FINAL RESOLUTION 382 (2015)2 1. The right to stand for election is a key component of local and regional democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • A HRC WG.6 34 IRQ 3 E.Pdf
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/34/IRQ/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 19 August 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty-fourth session 4–15 November 2019 Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Iraq* Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights I. Background 1. The present report was prepared pursuant to Human Rights Council resolutions 5/1 and 16/21, taking into consideration the periodicity of the universal periodic review. It is a summary of 54 stakeholders’ submissions1 to the universal periodic review, presented in a summarized manner owing to word-limit constraints. II. Information provided by stakeholders A. Scope of international obligations2 and cooperation with international human rights mechanisms and bodies3 2. MAAT, Al Karama, AI, MENA Rights and other stakeholders have stated that since the previous UPR cycle, the authorities have not taken any steps accede to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and the Convention on the Rights of Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families.4 3. JAI and other stakeholders urged Iraq to join the International Criminal Court and to enforce the rule of law in Iraq.5 4. Al-Miezan recommended Iraq to ratify the International Labor Convention No. 130 of 1969 concerning medical care and patient support.6 5. Jiyan called on the Government to remove reservations entered to Articles 2 (f, g) and 16 of the CEDAW mandating states to repeal discriminatory laws and practices and ensure equality in all matters related to family and marital relations; and urged the Government to accept individual complaint procedure under ratified human rights treaties7 * The present document was not edited before being sent to United Nations translation services.
    [Show full text]
  • On Parliamentary Representation)
    House of Commons Speaker's Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) Session 2008–09 Volume II Written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 April 2009 HC 167 -II Published on 27 May 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Speaker’s Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) The Conference secretariat will be able to make individual submissions available in large print or Braille on request. The Conference secretariat can be contacted on 020 7219 0654 or [email protected] On 12 November 2008 the House of Commons agreed to establish a new committee, to be chaired by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Michael Martin MP and known as the Speaker's Conference. The Conference has been asked to: "Consider, and make recommendations for rectifying, the disparity between the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people in the House of Commons and their representation in the UK population at large". It may also agree to consider other associated matters. The Speaker's Conference has until the end of the Parliament to conduct its inquiries. Current membership Miss Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) (Vice-Chairman) Ms Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North & Stoke Newington) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Mr David Blunkett MP (Labour, Sheffield, Brightside) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton & Honiton) Mr Ronnie Campbell MP (Labour, Blyth Valley) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) Mr Parmjit Dhanda MP (Labour, Gloucester) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Dr William McCrea MP (Democratic Unionist, South Antrim) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith & The Border) Fiona Mactaggart MP (Labour, Slough) Mr Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham Perry Barr) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Jo Swinson MP (Liberal Democrat, East Dunbartonshire) Mrs Betty Williams MP (Labour, Conwy) Publications The Reports and evidence of the Conference are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to Politics
    Equality and Human Rights Commission Research report 65 Pathways to politics Catherine Durose, Francesca Gains, Liz Richardson, Ryan Combs, Karl Broome and Christina Eason De Montfort University and University of Manchester Pathways to politics Catherine Durose, Francesca Gains, Liz Richardson, Ryan Combs, Karl Broome and Christina Eason De Montfort University and University of Manchester © Equality and Human Rights Commission 2011 First published Spring 2011 ISBN 978 1 84206 326 2 EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT SERIES The Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the Commission by commissioned researchers. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research team for further information about other Commission research reports, or visit our website: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House The Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com You can download a copy of this report as a PDF from our website: www.equalityhumanrights.com If you require this publication in an alternative format, please contact the Communications Team to discuss your needs at: [email protected] Contents Page Tables and figures i Acknowledgements ii Executive summary v 1. Background 1 1.1 Why is diversity in representation important? 2 1.2 Scope of the research 3 1.3 Researching diversity and inter-sectionality 4 1.4 Self-identification and representation 5 1.5 Understanding barriers and pathways 6 1.6 Chronically excluded groups 7 1.7 Structure of the report 8 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Eligible Voting Age
    STANDING COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, TRAINING AND YOUNG PEOPLE Inquiry into the Eligible Voting Age SEPTEMBER 2007 Report 5 STANDING COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, TRAINING AND YOUNG PEOPLE Committee Membership Ms Mary Porter AM MLA Chair Mr Mick Gentleman MLA Deputy Chair Mrs Vicki Dunne MLA Member Secretariat Dr Sandra Lilburn Committee Secretary Ms Lydia Chung Administration Support Contact information Phone: (02) 6205 0127 Fax: (02) 6205 0432 E‐mail: [email protected] Website: www.parliament.gov.au/committees Post: GPO Box 1020 CANBERRA ACT 2601 i STANDING COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, TRAINING AND YOUNG PEOPLE Resolution of Appointment On the 7 December 2004 the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory resolved to establish the Standing Committee on Education, Training and Young People to examine matters related to early childhood education and care, primary, secondary, post secondary and tertiary education and vocational training, non‐government education, youth and family services, technology, arts and culture, sport and recreation. Terms of Reference At its meeting on Wednesday, 29 March 2006, the Assembly passed the following resolution: “That this Assembly: (1) notes some support for the establishment of a scheme which allows 16 and 17 year old ACT residents to vote in elections and referendums for the ACT Legislative Assembly; and (2) refers the proposal to the Standing committee on Education, Training and Young People for inquiry and report back to the Assembly on or before 1 October 2007.” ii INQUIRY INTO THE
    [Show full text]
  • “A Dream Deferred”: the Southern Negro Youth Congress, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and the Politics of Historical Memory
    “A DREAM DEFERRED”: THE SOUTHERN NEGRO YOUTH CONGRESS, THE STUDENT NONVIOLENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE, AND THE POLITICS OF HISTORICAL MEMORY “WHAT HAPPENS TO A DREAM DEFERRED?” —LANGSTON HUGHES When the inimitable W. E. B. Du Bois stepped to the podium in Columbia, South Carolina’s Township Auditorium late that Saturday afternoon, October 20,1946, he proudly peered out over an enthusiastic crowd. A loud speaker carried his long-awaited message to those eager to hear him yet unable to get in; the overflow had gladly assembled on the lawn outside the auditorium. On the occasion of its Seventh Annual Southern Youth Legislature, the Southern Negro Youth Congress (SNYC) was delighted to be honoring Du Bois: “the senior statesman of the American Negro’s liberation struggle, the noble and peerless patriarch of our steady climb out of slavery’s darkness into the light of full freedom.”1 Before an audience of over 2,000, Du Bois spoke prophetically of a future black freedom movement coming out of the South led by the region’s black youth, a movement that he hoped would transform the South, the nation, indeed the world. “The future of American Negroes is in the South,” Du Bois proclaimed. “I trust then that an organization like yours is going to regard the South as the battle-ground of a great crusade…. This is the firing line not simply for the emancipation of the African Negro and the Negroes of the West Indies; for the emancipation of the colored races ….” Du Bois’ stirring message ignited applause from the audience, which took his message to heart.
    [Show full text]
  • Under Age: Redefining Legal Adulthood in 1970S America
    UNDER AGE: REDEFINING LEGAL ADULTHOOD IN 1970S AMERICA A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Timothy J. G. Cole May 2016 Examining Committee Members: Beth Bailey, Advisory Chair, Department of History, Temple University David Farber, Department of History, Temple University Bryant Simon, Department of History, Temple University Daniel Hart, External Member, Department of Psychology and Department of Childhood Studies, Rutgers University-Camden © Copyright 2015 by Timothy J. G. Cole All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Between the late 1960s and early 1980s, state and federal lawmakers made a number of unprecedented changes to the minimum age laws that define the legal boundaries between childhood and adulthood in the United States. By altering the voting age and the legal age of majority during the early 1970s, legislators effectively lowered the legal age of adulthood from twenty-one to eighteen, and launched a broader, more wide-ranging debate over other minimum age laws that would preoccupy legislators for much of the decade that followed. These reforms can be grouped into two distinct stages. Early 1970s reforms to the voting age and age of majority placed a great deal of faith in eighteen- to twenty-year-old Americans’ ability to make mature, responsible decisions for themselves, and marked a significant departure from the traditional practice of treating young people as legal adults at the age of twenty-one. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, however, a second set of reforms revoked much of the faith that legislators had placed in the nation’s young people, raising some key minimum age limits – such as the drinking age – and expanding adults’ ability to supervise and control teenaged youth.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Political Participation in Jordan
    MENA - OECD Governance Programme WOMEN’S Political Participation in JORDAN © OECD 2018 | Women’s Political Participation in Jordan | Page 2 WOMEN’S POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN JORDAN: BARRIERS, OPPORTUNITIES AND GENDER SENSITIVITY OF SELECT POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS MENA - OECD Governance Programme © OECD 2018 | Women’s Political Participation in Jordan | Page 3 OECD The mission of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is to promote policies that will improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world. It is an international organization made up of 37 member countries, headquartered in Paris. The OECD provides a forum in which governments can work together to share experiences and seek solutions to common problems within regular policy dialogue and through 250+ specialized committees, working groups and expert forums. The OECD collaborates with governments to understand what drives economic, social and environmental change and sets international standards on a wide range of things, from corruption to environment to gender equality. Drawing on facts and real-life experience, the OECD recommend policies designed to improve the quality of people’s. MENA - OECD MENA-OCED Governance Programme The MENA-OECD Governance Programme is a strategic partnership between MENA and OECD countries to share knowledge and expertise, with a view of disseminating standards and principles of good governance that support the ongoing process of reform in the MENA region. The Programme strengthens collaboration with the most relevant multilateral initiatives currently underway in the region. In particular, the Programme supports the implementation of the G7 Deauville Partnership and assists governments in meeting the eligibility criteria to become a member of the Open Government Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Too Young to Run Promoting the Rights of Young People Running for Public Office and Leadership Positions
    Concept Note For a side event at the United Nations Forum on Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law Human Rights Council, Geneva Not Too Young to Run Promoting the rights of young people running for public office and leadership positions Organisers: Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy and Youth (OSGEY) in partnership with the Inter- Parliamentary Union (IPU) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Brief Today’s generation of young people is the largest the world has ever known. Half of the global population is under the age of 25, and young people between the ages of 15-25 constitute one-fifth of this total. Yet, young people are starkly underrepresented in government and politics at virtually every level. One key factor contributing to low representation of young people in government and politics is an age of candidacy that is significantly higher than the legal voting age. This form of age discrimination is often met with other significant barriers, including social and cultural barriers and discrimination against young candidates. Efforts have been made around the world to promote the rights of young people running for public office and leadership positions by seeking to lower the legal age of candidacy. In 2007, a campaign entitled “How Old is Old Enough” lowered the age of candidacy requirement in England, Wales, and Scotland from 21 to 18, in line with the voting age. In Turkey, young people lobbied the government to reduce the age of candidacy for Parliament from 30 to 25 years in 2006. In Nigeria, the #NotTooYoungtoRun campaign has embarked on a mission to address age discrimination in candidacy for the legislative and executive branches, and serves as inspiration for the global campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Agenda
    4th Africa - Europe Youth Summit Abidjan Youth Declaration AU-EU Youth Plug-In Initiative Youth Agenda 3 Table of contents The Abidjan Declaration ................................................... 4 AU-EU Youth Plug-In Initiative: The Youth Agenda Introduction ......................................................................... 8 Executive Summaries ...................................................... 11 Education & Skills ............................................................. 12 Business, Job Creation & Entrepreneurship ............ 13 Governance & Political Inclusion ................................ 14 Peace & Security ............................................................... 15 Culture, Sports & Arts ..................................................... 16 Environment & Climate Change .................................. 17 Concise Notes ..................................................................... 19 Education & Skills ............................................................. 20 Business, Job Creation & Entrepreneurship ............ 32 Governance & Political Inclusion ................................ 42 Peace & Security ............................................................... 54 Culture, Sports & Arts ..................................................... 68 Environment & Climate Change .................................. 78 Follow-up .............................................................................. 88 Table of content 4 4th Africa-Europe Youth Summit — The Abidjan Declaration 9-11
    [Show full text]
  • Costeas-Geitonas School Model United Nations 2020
    Costeas-Geitonas School Model United Nations 2020 Committee: Youth Assembly Issue: Youth political participation as a means of bridging activism and electoral politics Student Officer: Velissarios Velissariou Position: Co-Head INTRODUCTION After the revolting and undemocratic crimes of World War II, the main objectives of the United Nations have been to reinforce the voice of civil society, fight for all fundamental human rights and promote the involvement of all age and social groups in democratic processes. For many years, it has been a challenge for every State to ensure the effective involvement of citizens in the life and decision-making of their social and political communities. Younger citizens, between the ages of 15 to 24, are considered to be one of the most politically significant age groups for two main reasons. First and foremost, young people are expected to govern a country in the future, thus, they play a very important role in a nation’s development. Secondly, younger voters tend to espouse progressive ideas and possibly believe in democratic standards more strongly than older generations. As the topic itself declares, action papers on this topic should revolve around not only encouraging the younger generation to take part in political activities, but also bringing a country’s electoral politics and activism together. Thus, young people are one of the major contributors to this supposed connection. Additionally, many of the United Nations sustainable development Figure 1: Likelihood to vote in Canada’s federal elections by age (poll)1 1 Costeas-Geitonas School Model United Nations 2020 goals concern the youth, with the ultimate one being the creation of a better world for future generations.1 However, the youth tends to show a profound amount of reluctance to take part in democratic political electoral activities, at a point it could be said that there is an ongoing crisis on young people’s civic engagement.
    [Show full text]