DOCSLIB.ORG

Hedge Accounting Under IFRS 9 February 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hedge Accounting Under IFRS 9 February 2014 Applying IFRS Hedge accounting under IFRS 9 February 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.2 The main changes in the IFRS 9 hedge accounting requirements 3 2 Risk management 4 2.1 Object of hedge accounting 4 2.2 Risk management strategy versus risk management objective 4 3. Hedge items 6 3.1 General requirements 6 3.2 Hedges of exposures affecting other comprehensive income 6 3.3 Aggregated exposures 7 3.4 Risk component 10 3.5 Components of a nominal amount 15 3.6 Groups of items 18 3.7 Credit risk exposures 26 4. Hedging Instruments 27 5 Qualifying criteria 30 5.1 Designation 30 5.2 Economic relationship 31 5.3 Impact of credit risk 32 5.4 Setting the hedge ratio 35 5.5 Designating proxy hedges 37 6. Subsequent assessment of effectiveness, rebalancing and discontinuation 39 6.1 Assessment of effectiveness 39 6.2 Rebalancing 40 6.3 Discontinuation 44 6.4 Measuring ineffectiveness 49 7. Other changes from IAS 39 51 7.1 Time value of options 51 7.2 Forward element of forward contracts and foreign currency basis spread of financial instruments 56 7.3 Own use contracts 57 8 Presentation 60 8.1 Cash flow hedges 60 8.2 Fair value hedges 61 8.3 Hedges of groups of items 61 9 Disclosures 62 9.1 Background and general requirements 62 9.2 Risk management strategy 62 9.3 The amount, timing and uncertainty of future cash flows 64 9.4 The effects of hedge accounting on the financial position and performance 66 10 Effective data and transition 68 10.1 Effective date 68 10.2 Prospective application in general 68 10.3 Limited retrospective application 68 February 2014 Hedge accounting under IFRS 9 1 1. Introduction On 19 November 2013 the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) The new hedge issued a new version of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and accounting model aims amendments to IFRS 9, IFRS 7 and IAS 39) (IFRS 9 (2013)), which primarily to provide a better link introduces the new hedge accounting requirements. IFRS 9 (2013) does not between an entity’s risk provide any particular solutions specifically tailored to so-called ‘macro hedge’ management strategy, accounting, the term used to describe the more complex risk management the rationale for hedging practices used by entities such as banks. An accounting model specifically for and the impact of macro hedging is being developed as a separate standard and a discussion hedging on the financial paper on this subject is due to be published in the first quarter of 2014. statements. The high-level aim of the new hedge accounting model is to provide useful information about risk management activities that use financial instruments, with the effect that financial reporting will reflect more accurately how an entity manages its risk and the extent to which hedging mitigates those risks. Specifically, the new model aims to provide a better link between an entity’s risk management strategy, the rationale for hedging and the impact of hedging on the financial statements. Snapshot of the most significant areas of change for hedge accounting: Requirement High-level summary of key changes Hedge effectiveness This is prospective only and can be qualitative, testing depending on the complexity of the hedge. The 80-125% range is replaced by an objectives-based test that focuses on the economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument, and the effect of credit risk on that economic relationship. Risk component This may be designated as the hedged item, not only for financial items, but also for non-financial items, provided the risk component is separately identifiable and reliably measureable. Costs of hedging The time value of an option, the forward element of a forward contract and any foreign currency basis spread can be excluded from the designation of a financial instrument as the hedging instrument and accounted for as costs of hedging. This means that, instead of the fair value changes of these elements affecting profit or loss like a trading instrument, these amounts get allocated to profit or loss similar to transaction costs (which can include basis adjustments), while fair value changes are temporarily recognised in other comprehensive income (OCI). Groups of items More designations of groups of items as the hedged item are possible, including layer designations and some net positions. Disclosures These are more extensive and require the provision of more meaningful information and insights. 2 February 2014 Hedge accounting under IFRS 9 The addition of the new hedge accounting requirements mean that, for the first Applying IFRS 9 (2013), time, the application of IFRS 9 will be a serious consideration for non-financial before it is superseded entities. For many of them, hedge accounting will be the most significant effect by a consolidated of the reform of the accounting for financial instruments. In particular, version, would enable non-financial entities will have an incentive to apply IFRS 9 (2013) before the hedge accounting to be IASB completes its phase on impairment because the IASB then intends to applied whilst deferring create a consolidated version of IFRS 9 that will reduce the early application the application of the choices for different parts of the standard. Applying IFRS 9 (2013), before it is impairment superseded by a consolidated version, would enable hedge accounting to be requirements until the applied whilst deferring the application of the impairment requirements until the mandatory effective date.1 Based on previous IASB discussions, once the new mandatory effective consolidated version of IFRS 9 has replaced IFRS 9 (2013), entities may be left date. with no choice but to early apply the hedge accounting and impairment requirements (and the revised classification and measurement requirements) all at the same time. To gauge the benefits of the new requirements, non-financial entities will need to consider their hedging activities and existing hedge accounting, or why hedge accounting has not been achieved in the past. This assessment encompasses operational aspects (such as the hedge effectiveness test) as well as the eligibility of items (such as risk components of non-financial items) that can be designated in hedging relationships. For financial entities, the situation is more complex: the ongoing development of the limited amendments to the classification and measurement of financial instruments, as well as the projects on accounting for macro hedging and insurance contracts, create more uncertainty about the eventual picture and how the different projects will interact. In this publication, we have taken a closer look at the new requirements, consider some of the potential benefits for reporting entities and also explore some of the challenges posed by them. We expect the insights in this publication to be particularly relevant for accountants, treasurers and all who are involved in hedging activities in both financial and non-financial services entities. 1.2 The main changes in the IFRS 9 hedge accounting requirements Hedge accounting under IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement is often criticised as being complex and rules-based, thus, ultimately not reflecting an entity’s risk management activities. Consequently, the objective of IFRS 9 is to reflect the effect of an entity’s risk management activities in the financial statements. This includes replacing some of the arbitrary rules by more principle-based requirements and allowing more hedging instruments and hedged items to qualify for hedge accounting. Overall, this should result in more risk management strategies qualifying for hedge accounting. Some of the basics of hedge accounting do not change as a result of IFRS 9. There are still three types of hedging relationships: • Fair value hedges • Cash flow hedges • Hedges of net investments in foreign operations 1 In February 2014, the IASB tentatively decided that the mandatory effective date for IFRS 9 will be for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. February 2014 Hedge accounting under IFRS 9 3 Hedge accounting remains optional and can only be applied to hedging Hedge accounting relationships that meet the qualifying criteria (see sections 3, 4 and 5). remains optional and can only be applied to IFRS 9 does not revisit the mechanics for hedges of net investments in foreign hedging relationships operations. Such hedges must still be accounted for similar to cash flow hedges. IFRS 9 did have some consequential amendments to IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net that meet the qualifying Investment in a Foreign Operation. criteria. Rather than providing a comprehensive summary of hedge accounting, this publication focuses on the differences between hedge accounting under IAS 39 and the hedge accounting requirements in IFRS 9. 2. Risk management 2.1 Objective of hedge accounting Every entity is exposed to business risks from its daily operations. Many of those risks have an impact on the cash flows or the value of assets and liabilities, and therefore, ultimately affect profit or loss. In order to manage these risk exposures, companies often enter into derivative contracts (or, less commonly, other financial instruments) to hedge them. Hedging can, therefore, be seen as a risk management activity in order to change an entity’s risk profile. Applying the normal IFRS accounting requirements to those risk management activities can then result in accounting mismatches, when the gains or losses on a hedging instrument are not recognised in the same period(s) and/or in the same place in the financial statements as gains or losses on the hedged exposure. The idea of hedge accounting is to reduce this mismatch by changing either the measurement or (in the case of certain firm commitments) recognition of the hedged exposure, or the accounting for the hedging instrument.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Update on FASB's Hedging Rules
    Update on FASB’s Hedging Rules In 2017, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The amendments made targeted—but substantial—changes to better align hedge accounting with management’s risk management activities and reduced the cost and complexity of applying hedge accounting. Many companies took advantage of early adoption, giving rise to several implementation and operational questions that FASB recently addressed in a set of technical corrections, ASU 2019-04. Hedge accounting is an option and will continue to be a somewhat difficult area for preparers, auditors and users, notwithstanding the recent simplifications. FASB has a separate project underway covering the “last-of-layer” method, which makes it easier to hedge prepayable financial instruments. This project is in the initial deliberation stage, and no time frame is set for an exposure draft. FASB also has added a project to address the operational challenges of migrating to a new benchmark rate once the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is phased out in 2022. Removing and replacing LIBOR will be complicated with the biggest effect on long-dated contracts with a maturity after the phaseout. For derivatives contracts, master agreements between counterparties likely will have to be amended or replaced. Retail mortgages, home equity lines of credit and any other consumer or business debt tied to LIBOR may have to be amended unless a back-up interest rate index is referenced in the original documentation. Mortgage-backed securities, loans and floating rate bonds all tied to LIBOR will have to be addressed contractually and—with regard to deal-specific covenants—may require consents from the owners of these securities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Guide to IFRS 7 for Investment
    Asset Management A practical guide to IFRS 7 For investment managers and investment, private equity and real estate funds April 2010 PricewaterhouseCoopers’ IFRS and corporate governance publications and tools 2010 IFRS technical publications IFRS disclosure checklist 2009 IFRS manual of accounting 2010 Outlines the disclosures required by all IFRSs PwC’s global IFRS manual provides published up to October 2009. comprehensive practical guidance on how to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS. Includes hundreds of worked examples, extracts from company reports and model financial statements. IFRS pocket guide 2009 Provides a summary of the IFRS recognition and measurement requirements. Including currencies, A practical guide to IFRS 8 for real estate entities assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses, business Guidance in question-and-answer format addressing combinations and interim financial statements. the issues arising for real estate entities when applying IFRS 8, ‘Operating segments’. Illustrative IFRS financial statements 2009 – investment funds Updated financial statements of a fictional investment fund illustrating the disclosure and A practical guide for investment funds presentation required by IFRSs applicable to to IAS 32 amendments financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2009. 12-page guide addressing the questions that are The company is an existing preparer of IFRS arising in applying the amendment IAS 32 and IAS 1, financial statements; IFRS 1 is not applicable. ‘Puttable financial instruments and obligations arising in liquidation’, with a focus on puttable instruments. Illustrative IFRS financial statements 2009 – private equity A practical guide to new IFRSs for 2010 Financial statements of a fictional private equity 48-page guidance providing high-level outline of hte limited partnership illustrating the disclosure and key requirements of IFRSs effective in 2010, in presentation required by IFRSs applicable to question and answer format.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedge Funds Oversight, Report of the Technical Committee Of
    Hedge Funds Oversight Consultation Report TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS MARCH 2009 This paper is for public consultation purposes only. It has not been approved for any other purpose by the IOSCO Technical Committee or any of its members. Foreword The IOSCO Technical Committee has published for public comment this consultation report on Hedge Funds Oversight. The Report makes preliminary recommendations of regulatory approaches that may be used to mitigate the regulatory risks posed by hedge funds. The Report will be finalised after consideration of comments received from the public. How to Submit Comments Comments may be submitted by one of the three following methods on or before 30 April 2009. To help us process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. 1. E-mail • Send comments to Greg Tanzer, Secretary General, IOSCO at the following email address: [email protected] • The subject line of your message should indicate “Public Comment on the Hedge Funds Oversight: Consultation Report”. • Please do not submit any attachments as HTML, GIF, TIFF, PIF or EXE files. OR 2. Facsimile Transmission Send a fax for the attention of Greg Tanzer using the following fax number: + 34 (91) 555 93 68. OR 3. Post Send your comment letter to: Greg Tanzer Secretary General IOSCO 2 C / Oquendo 12 28006 Madrid Spain Your comment letter should indicate prominently that it is a “Public Comment on the Hedge Funds Oversight: Consultation Report” Important: All comments will be made available publicly, unless anonymity is specifically requested. Comments will be converted to PDF format and posted on the IOSCO website.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020.12.03 RSIC Meeting Materials
    WILLIAM (BILL) H. HANCOCK, CPA RONALD P. WILDER, PH. D CHAIR VICE-CHAIR 1 PEGGY G. BOYKIN, CPA ALLEN R. GILLESPIE, CFA COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER WILLIAM (BILL) J. CONDON, JR. JD, MA, CPA REBECCA M. GUNNLAUGSSON, PH. D COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER EDWARD N. GIOBBE, MBA REYNOLDS WILLIAMS, JD, CFP COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER _____________________________________________________________________________________ Commission Meeting Agenda Thursday, December 3, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. MEETING PARTICIPANTS WILL APPEAR VIA TELECONFERENCE Teleconference Streaming Via RSIC.SC.GOV RSIC Presentation Center Open for Public Access to Teleconference I. Call to Order and Consent Agenda A. Adoption of Proposed Agenda B. Approval of September 2020 Minutes II. Chair’s Report III. Committee Reports IV. CEO’s Report V. CIO’s Report A. Quarterly Investment Performance Update VI. Strategic Investment Topic Presentation – Rebalancing VII. Chinese Public Company Investment Discussion VIII. Delegated Investment Report IX. Executive Session – Discuss investment matters pursuant to S.C. Code Sections 9-16- 80 and 9-16-320; to discuss personnel matters pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. Section 30-4-70(a)(1); and receive advice from legal counsel pursuant to S.C. Code Section 30-4-70(a)(2). X. Potential Action Resulting from Executive Session XI. Adjournment NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING This notice is given to meet the requirements of the S.C. Freedom of Information Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Furthermore, this facility is accessible to individuals with disabilities, and special accommodations will be provided if requested in advance. 1201 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1510, COLUMBIA, SC 29201 // (P) 803.737.6885 // (F) 803.737.7070 // WWW.RSIC.SC.GOV 2 AMENDED DRAFT South Carolina Retirement System Investment Commission Meeting Minutes September 10, 2020 9:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedge Accounting FBS 2013 USER CONFERENCE
    9/12/2013 Hedge Accounting FBS 2013 USER CONFERENCE Purpose of a Hedge • Provide a change in value of the hedging instrument in the opposite direction of the hedged item. • For tax purposes, the gains or losses on from hedging activities are recognized when hedges are lifted • For accounting purposes, hedging gains/losses are recognized in the period the gains or losses occur – Hedging is consider normal business operation so should be matched to gross revenue and expense 1 9/12/2013 What is Hedging? • Hedging is a risk management strategy that attempts to offset price movements of owned assets, planned production of a commodity or good, or planned purchases of commodity or good against a derivative instrument (which generally derives its value from an underlying physical commodity). • It is not an attempt to make money in the futures and options markets, but rather an attempt to offset price changes in the cash market, thereby protecting the producers net income. What is Not Hedging? • Speculation – Taking a futures or options position in a commodity not owned or produced. – Taking the same position in the futures or options market as exists (or will exist) on the farm. • Forward contracts – Fixed price, delayed or deferred price contracts, basis contracts, installment sale contracts, etc. 2 9/12/2013 Tax Purposes • May be different from GAAP • An agricultural producer normally reports hedging gains or losses when the hedge is closed (similar to GAAP). • However, if the producer meets certain requirements, they can elect to report all hedging gains and losses on a mark- to-market basis (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Hedge Accounting Changes and Their Impacts
    Exploring Global Hedge Accounting Changes and Their Impacts Dan Gentzel, CPA Karen Weller, CTP Managing Director Director Chatham Financial Royal Caribbean Cruises Agenda 1 IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement – Impact on Derivative Valuation and Hedge Accounting 2 Hedge Accounting Policy Election – Deciding Between IAS 39 and IFRS 9 3 Novation of OTC Derivatives to Central Clearing Counterparties 4 Accounting for Futures Contracts 5 Overnight Index Swap Rate (“OIS”) – a New Benchmark Rate 6 Key Hedge Accounting Considerations from IFRS 9 7 Accounting for Costs of Hedging Under IFRS 9 8 Proposed ASU: Accounting for Certain Receive-Variable, Pay-Fixed Interest Rate Swaps 9 The Future of Hedge Accounting Under US GAAP IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement Impact on Derivative Valuation and Hedge Accounting Overview Practical Implications • IFRS 13 is a new accounting standard . Understanding the impact • Effective Jan 1, 2013 . CVA-DVA – complex to calculate • Converged with US GAAP properly • Defines how to measure fair value . Impact on earnings • Modifies definition in IAS 39 . Additional disclosures • Derivatives are impacted . US GAAP – IFRS differences . • Incorporate credit risk Hedge accounting • Use a market participants approach . Choosing an approach • Calculate CVA-DVA . Materiality . Cost / benefit Hedge Accounting Policy Election Deciding Between IAS 39 and IFRS 9 Overview Practical Implications • Macro hedging project . Choosing either IAS 39 or IFRS 9 • Has delayed release of IFRS 9 hedge . How to evaluate accounting guidance . Reasons for IAS 39 • IASB decided to issue separate IFRS . Reasons for IFRS 9 on macro hedging • IASB provided an accounting policy choice until macro hedging standard issued • Continue applying IAS 39 • Adopt IFRS 9 • Under both choices, IAS 39 macro hedging can continue to be applied until new macro hedging IFRS issued Novation of OTC Derivatives to Central Clearing Counterparties Overview Practical Implications • Regulatory changes expected to .
    [Show full text]
  • Buying Options on Futures Contracts. a Guide to Uses
    NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION Buying Options on Futures Contracts A Guide to Uses and Risks Table of Contents 4 Introduction 6 Part One: The Vocabulary of Options Trading 10 Part Two: The Arithmetic of Option Premiums 10 Intrinsic Value 10 Time Value 12 Part Three: The Mechanics of Buying and Writing Options 12 Commission Charges 13 Leverage 13 The First Step: Calculate the Break-Even Price 15 Factors Affecting the Choice of an Option 18 After You Buy an Option: What Then? 21 Who Writes Options and Why 22 Risk Caution 23 Part Four: A Pre-Investment Checklist 25 NFA Information and Resources Buying Options on Futures Contracts: A Guide to Uses and Risks National Futures Association is a Congressionally authorized self- regulatory organization of the United States futures industry. Its mission is to provide innovative regulatory pro- grams and services that ensure futures industry integrity, protect market par- ticipants and help NFA Members meet their regulatory responsibilities. This booklet has been prepared as a part of NFA’s continuing public educa- tion efforts to provide information about the futures industry to potential investors. Disclaimer: This brochure only discusses the most common type of commodity options traded in the U.S.—options on futures contracts traded on a regulated exchange and exercisable at any time before they expire. If you are considering trading options on the underlying commodity itself or options that can only be exercised at or near their expiration date, ask your broker for more information. 3 Introduction Although futures contracts have been traded on U.S. exchanges since 1865, options on futures contracts were not introduced until 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedge Fund Performance During the Internet Bubble Bachelor Thesis Finance
    Hedge fund performance during the Internet bubble Bachelor thesis finance Colby Harmon 6325661 /10070168 Thesis supervisor: V. Malinova 1 Table of content 1. Introduction p. 3 2. Literature reviews of studies on mutual funds and hedge funds p. 5 2.1 Evolution of performance measures p. 5 2.2 Studies on performance of mutual and hedge funds p. 6 3. Deficiencies in peer group averages p. 9 3.1 Data bias when measuring the performance of hedge funds p. 9 3.2 Short history of hedge fund data p. 10 3.3 Choice of weight index p. 10 4. Hedge fund strategies p. 12 4.1 Equity hedge strategies p. 12 4.1.1 Market neutral strategy p. 12 4.2 Relative value strategies p. 12 4.2.1 Fixed income arbitrage p. 12 4.2.2 Convertible arbitrage p. 13 4.3 Event driven strategies p. 13 4.3.1 Distressed securities p. 13 4.3.2 Merger arbitrage p. 14 4.4 Opportunistic strategies p. 14 4.4.1 Global macro p. 14 4.5 Managed futures p. 14 4.5.1 Trend followers p. 15 4.6 Recent performance of different strategies p. 15 5. Data description p. 16 6. Methodology p. 18 6.1 Seven factor model description p. 18 6.2 Hypothesis p. 20 7. Results p. 21 7.1 Results period 1997-2000 p. 21 7.2 Results period 2000-2003 p. 22 8. Discussion of results p. 23 9. Conclusion p. 24 2 1. Introduction A day without Internet today would be cruel and unthinkable.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitrage Pricing Theory∗
    ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY∗ Gur Huberman Zhenyu Wang† August 15, 2005 Abstract Focusing on asset returns governed by a factor structure, the APT is a one-period model, in which preclusion of arbitrage over static portfolios of these assets leads to a linear relation between the expected return and its covariance with the factors. The APT, however, does not preclude arbitrage over dynamic portfolios. Consequently, applying the model to evaluate managed portfolios contradicts the no-arbitrage spirit of the model. An empirical test of the APT entails a procedure to identify features of the underlying factor structure rather than merely a collection of mean-variance efficient factor portfolios that satisfies the linear relation. Keywords: arbitrage; asset pricing model; factor model. ∗S. N. Durlauf and L. E. Blume, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, forthcoming, Palgrave Macmillan, reproduced with permission of Palgrave Macmillan. This article is taken from the authors’ original manuscript and has not been reviewed or edited. The definitive published version of this extract may be found in the complete The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics in print and online, forthcoming. †Huberman is at Columbia University. Wang is at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the McCombs School of Business in the University of Texas at Austin. The views stated here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Introduction The Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) was developed primarily by Ross (1976a, 1976b). It is a one-period model in which every investor believes that the stochastic properties of returns of capital assets are consistent with a factor structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Securitization & Hedge Funds
    SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: COLLATERALIZED FUND OBLIGATIONS SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: CREATING A MORE EFFICIENT MARKET BY CLARK CHENG, CFA Intangis Funds AUGUST 6, 2002 INTANGIS PAGE 1 SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: COLLATERALIZED FUND OBLIGATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 3 PROBLEM.................................................................................................................................................... 4 SOLUTION................................................................................................................................................... 5 SECURITIZATION..................................................................................................................................... 5 CASH-FLOW TRANSACTIONS............................................................................................................... 6 MARKET VALUE TRANSACTIONS.......................................................................................................8 ARBITRAGE................................................................................................................................................ 8 FINANCIAL ENGINEERING.................................................................................................................... 8 TRANSPARENCY......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Session 7 Derivatives and Hedging
    Session 7 Derivatives and Hedging Risk management background Derivatives Hedging Hedge ineffectiveness FAS 133 and related GAAP (all in ASC Section 815) Analysis of derivatives and hedging 163 Extant Proposals to Change Hedge Accounting In May 2010, the FASB issued Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“the proposed ASU”) Simpler than but reasonably consistent with FAS 133 Somewhat easier to obtain hedge accounting Hedge accounting obscures volatility less After putting the project on the back burner, the FASB began redeliberating the proposed ASU in February 2015 Summary of deliberations through March 23, 2016 is available on FASB website FASB currently plans to issue an exposure draft in 2016Q3 164 Extant Proposals to Change Hedge Accounting (2) In November 2013, the IASB issued new, bank-friendlier hedge accounting rules in IFRS 9 (replacing rules in IAS 39) Provides more flexibility to define the hedged item than either IAS 39 or FAS 133: groups of positions (including derivatives), net positions (including net nil positions), risk layers (including last layers) Also provides more flexibility to define the hedge than IAS 39 or FAS 133: non-derivative/cash instruments classified at fair value through profit and loss Treats certain types of hedge ineffectiveness (e.g., option time value) as a cost of hedging to be amortized into income over time Hedge accounting allowed if economic hedging relationship exists consistent with firm’s risk management strategy; no quantitative threshold need be met The IASB has an ongoing project to allow “macro” hedging of open portfolios; issued discussion paper in April 2014 but does not appear to 165 have made much progress since then Derivatives Under FAS 133 (ASC 815), the payoffs on a derivative depend on the notional amount of one or more underlyings principal amount physical quantity one or more prices interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices..
    [Show full text]
  • Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)
    No. 2017-12 August 2017 Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities An Amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification® The FASB Accounting Standards Codification® is the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. An Accounting Standards Update is not authoritative; rather, it is a document that communicates how the Accounting Standards Codification is being amended. It also provides other information to help a user of GAAP understand how and why GAAP is changing and when the changes will be effective. For additional copies of this Accounting Standards Update and information on applicable prices and discount rates contact: Order Department Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Please ask for our Product Code No. ASU2017-12. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SERIES (ISSN 0885-9051) is published monthly with the exception of May, July, and November by the Financial Accounting Foundation, 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116. Periodicals postage paid at Norwalk, CT and at additional mailing offices. The full subscription rate is $255 per year. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Financial Accounting Series, 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116. | No. 456 Copyright © 2017 by Financial Accounting Foundation. All rights reserved. Content copyrighted by Financial Accounting Foundation may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Financial Accounting Foundation. Financial Accounting Foundation claims no copyright in any portion hereof that constitutes a work of the United States Government.
    [Show full text]