DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservative Digest Box: 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservative Digest Box: 5 Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Blackwell, Morton: Files Folder Title: Conservative Digest Box: 5 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ NEWSFRDM FOR RELEASE: Immediately CONTACT: Art Kelly (703) 356-0440 ext. 277 CONSERVATIVES OPPOSE NEW TAX INCREASE Richard A. Viguerie, publisher of Conservative Digest magazine, has announced the opposition of-:=-,:.- conservative leaders to proposed increases i--n---either- the federal gasoline tax or the -Social Security tax. ' Viguerie said that these tax increases would seriously damage the economy and hurt families who are struggling to make ends meet. "At a time that economic conditions are already extremely precarious, we do not need to make it more difficult for people to make a living. Increasing the cost of gasoline will hurt working men and women who need an automobile for their jobs or for the basic transportation of their families. And hiking the Social Security tax will take more disposable income out of the hands of the people, while adding additional pressures on businesses. More bankruptcies and unemployment would inevitably result from these tax increases," Viguerie said. "In funding defense, a jobs program, and Social Security, all kinds of alternatives have been discussed. But one option seems to be missing from the list of possibilities -- reduce spending on low priority and counterproductive projects. Our critical needs can all be provided for by transferring funds out of the budgets of the Energy and Education departments, from foreign aid, and out o.f our contributions- to t-l1e TJ:i:i.--i-t..ed-Nations-~ - nQ-- absolut.ely do not need to increase taxes on the people," he said. "Coming on the heels of the Administration's recent $228 billion tax increase, many conservatives are shocked and disappointed that new taxes would even be remotely considered by the President and some Republican leaders in the Congress. I am afraid there is a strange inclination on the part of some Reagan advisers to repeatedly turn to tax increases as the solution to our economic problems," the statement added. Among those joining Viguerie in this statement are: 7777 Leesburg Pike Falls Church, VA. 22043 (703) 356-0440 THE WASHINGTON POST, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1982 William Raspberry Rowland Evans and Robert Novak Has the President ... No, He's -Just Been Deposed? Being Misadvised Moments after President Reagan told But, Reagan asked, wouldn't the day before Reagan's pre!J.q conference, his press conference Thursday that it $100 billion tax increase he reluctantly Stockman was the on ly solid voice would not take a palace coup after all for swallowed last summer at least trim against the tax. Even White House the projected future deficit? No, The first coup d'etat in U.S. history the gasoline tax increase, which 43 hardly be a coincidence that the reve­ him to support higher gas taxes, one of aide Rich Williamson, usually strong appears to have been accepted by the · days earlier had been "flatly" ruled out lation was made to the senior White his anti-tax economic advisers voiced his Stockman replied, the deficits will get against higher taxes, was benevolently American people with surprising calm. was under active consideration-even House correspondent. There is some own disapproval of the scheme, but bigger. Stunned, the president said: "If neutral in his role as the presidential There has been hardly any panic since to the extent of renaming it a "user speculation that the entire exchange added: "If we get away with just that, I had known that, I never would have liaison with hard-pressed state govern­ the overthrow of the Reagan govern­ fee." That was the first official indica­ between Reagan and Thomas was pre­ we'll be well ahead of the game." backed the tax increase." For the next ments .. ment, the stock market remains opti­ tion that, sometime between the Sept. arranged so as to minimize public The nickel-a-gallon tax to finance 10 minutes of the briefing, Reagan's At last week's press conference (his mistic, and life seems to be going on 29 and the Nov. 11 conferences, there panic. public works spending is, therefore, a eyes glazed over and his mind seemed first since Sept. 28), the president ap­ pretty much as usual. had been a "palace coup" or that Rea­ Early indications are that the coup ploy to appease growing bipartisan detached. parently had forgotten that his "palace Accordingly, at that night's press ThL•1 unexpected equanimity in the gan had somehow been "overtaken or was prompted by Reagan's refusal to hunger on Capitol Hill for old-fash­ coup" crack answered a specific gaso­ face of unprecedented crisis may be at­ overthrown." take actions to combat the country's ioned pump-priming in the New Deal conference, when he was asked about line-tax question, claim1ng he was new tax hikes and "specifically, an in­ tributed to the smoothness with which Edwin Newman and William Safire, near-record and still-growing unem­ tradition. It is supposed to preempt referring only to "general" tax in­ the coup was carried out, and also to two of the country's best-known ployment rate. The tax increase, which ambitious schemes for far more spend­ crease in the gasoline tax," he replied: creases. More remarkably, Reagan had the calmness with which the depoeed semanticists, have insisted that the the former president earlier had ing and far higher taxes. "Unless there's a palace coup and I'm swallowed whole Lewis' contention leader himself has accepted his ouster. original Reagan response should be refused to consider, would be used to However improbable that goal, the overtaken !laughter) or overthrown, that the tax is a "user fee" (Treasury Indeed, not even the most sophisti­ read to mean only that he didn't "see finance repair of the nation's bridges gas tax ploy marks another benchmark · no." Hearing that, and coupling it with experts consider it, plain and simple, cated Washington observers knew the necessity for" flatly ruling out the and highways, both because they des­ in the administration's departure from his shock during the afternoon briefing an excise tax). Reagan also reverted to, about the coup until former President tax increase absent a coup. However, perately need repairing and because it basic principles. It undercuts both the session, White House insiders assumed New Deal logic · in declaring "There Reagan revealed it during a nationally moei Washington observers, noting is a time-tested way of creating jobs. "new federalism" and free-market eco­ the presidant had drawn the line. would be jobs created" by the tax. What's more, there were plenty of televised news conference last Thurs­ Reagan's frequently muddled syntax, Apparently, leaders of the new gov­ nomics; it signals that the White House The hope of conservatives inside the arguments inside the administration to day evening. usume that the former leader meant ernment have decided to let Reagan re­ is moving toward accommodation, not administration that this at least would At an earlier news conference, this bolster the president's instincts agaim1t to indicate that a coup was imminent main at the White House, as a sort of confrontation, with the expanded forestall worse retreats is dimmed by the gas tax, plugged relentlessly for two one on Sept. 29, the now-depoeed and that active consideration of a gaso­ figurehead caretaker. The best expla­ Democratic majority in the House and decisions facing the president this leader was asked whether, in view of tax nation may lie in the national polls. increasingly fractious Republicans in years by Transportation Secretary line increase would be the cue that week. He will be asked by his budget­ his "great distaste" for raising taxes, he the Senate. Drew Lewis. Stockman, for once op­ it had occurred. As matters appear to be unfolding, makers whether he wants to sla.'!h de­ could "assure the American people posing higher taxes, has argued that Details of the apparent ouster are the American people will still have It also provides fresh evidence that fense spending, raise taxes or abandon that you will flatly rule out any the non-interstate highways most in now still not clear. Indeed, it is still not Reagan, whom they like personally, Reagan is no match for the concen­ the balanced-budget goal. need of repair are the responsibility of tax increa.'les, revenue enhancers or, known who heads the new government. and be rid of his policies, which they trated barrage from his advisers. In­ still ignoring the the states. Reagan's ''new federalism" Ronald Reagan, specifically, an increase in the gasoline What is clear is that the change was found increasingly dismaying. deed, his turnaround on the gas · tax monetary policy that has created this tax." The answer, more ominous in ret­ would dictate that if states want to re­ handled with consummate grace, both Such sensitivity augurs well for the raises this question: can he withstand deep recession, is entrapped in the rospect than was obvious at the time: pair their roads, they should raise their by the coup leaders and by the former future of America. the renewed spend-and-tax syndrome budget process that led to the huge tax own gasoline taxes. ''Unless there's a palace coup and president himself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wanda Morris
    Bridgewater College BC Digital Commons Bridgewater Magazine Journals and Campus Publications 3-1982 Vol. 57, No. 3 | March 1982 Bridgewater College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bridgewater.edu/bridgewater_magazine BRIDGEWATER__ March, l982 Terrel Bell To Speak Founders Day Terrel H. Bell, U.S. Secretary of Education, is to be the featured speaker for the 1982 Bridgewater College Founders Day activities April 2. Dr. Bell will speak at a special 3 p. m. academic convocation and at the Founders Day dinner that evening in the Kline Campus Center dining room. Dr. Bell will be honored with a Doctor of Laws degree to be conferred during the academic convocation program. Dr. Bell was sworn in as Secretary of Education in January 1981, following his appointment by President Reagan and confirmation by the U.S. Senate. Prior to his cabinet appointment, Bell had been Utah's Commissioner of Higher Education and Chief Executive Officer of the Board of Regents since 1976, following two years of service in Washington, D.C. as the 21st Commis­ sioner of Education. Dr. Bell holds a B.A. degree from Southern Idaho College of Education and an M.S. from the University of Idaho. He earned his doctorate in educational administration from the University of Utah. Bell has classroom teaching experience on both the second­ ary and college levels. Dr. Bell is known for his advocation of increased community Terrel H. Bell, Secretar_J' of Education Continued on page /3 Dr. Ben F. Wade Named College Provost Dr. Wayne F. Geisert, President of away from campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Republicans on the Run Editor's Column
    December 1984 Volume XX, No.6 Price $ 1.50 ~\- Republicans On The Run Editor's Column One of the first orders of business for RepUblicans on Capitol Hillfollowing the 1984 election was the selection of new Senate leaders. For moderates and progressives, the news was encouraging. Bob D ole was elected majon'ty leader. RIPON fORtJM John Heinz again heads the National Republican Senaton'al Commillee; John Chcifee is in charge ofth e Senate Republi­ can Conference; B ob Packwood is chairman of the Senate Editor's Column 2 Finance Commillee; a nd John Danforth is in charge of the Pronlu and Perspectivu: 3 Senate Commerce Commillee, They join other moderates A Conversation with andprogressives, such as Pete Domenici and M ark Haifield, Donald Shriver in key leadership positions. Our cover design points out that some moderates might, in A P~serlptlon (or Pro&resslves: 7 Dale Curt!, fact, seek the presidency in 1988. Ofcourse, it is too early, if not plain wrong, to start sen'ously hypothesizing about 1988. Editorial: LooklnaBeyond 1984 Yet it isn't too earlyfor GOP moderates and progressives to • begin organizing andfocusing on specific goals. This is the Toward A PrOltenive 12 Repubtlean Alenda: theme of several articles in this edilion oflhe Forum. Dale David L. S.lI acb CUrlis outlines several obstacles thaI must be overcome, but he also claims thatfivefavorable trends existfor moderates Proafuslve Republicans: IS and progressives, David Sallachpresenls theftrst in a sen'es Head Soutb and Go Wu t: William P. McKenzie ofprogressive R epublican "agendas, "focusing pn'man'ly on U.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Right
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The New Right Elizabeth Julia Reiley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Reiley, Elizabeth Julia, "The New Right" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625286. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-mnnb-at94 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW RIGHT 'f A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Elizabeth Reiley 1984 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Elizabeth Approved, May 1984 Edwin H . Rhyn< Satoshi Ito Dedicated to Pat Thanks, brother, for sharing your love, your life, and for making us laugh. We feel you with us still. Presente! iii. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................... v ABSTRACT.................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................ s 1 CHAPTER I. THE NEW RIGHT . '............ 6 CHAPTER II. THE 1980 ELECTIONS . 52 CHAPTER III. THE PRO-FAMILY COALITION . 69 CHAPTER IV. THE NEW RIGHT: BEYOND 1980 95 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION ............... 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................. 130 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express her appreciation to all the members of her committee for the time they gave to the reading and criticism of the manuscript, especially Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of High Stakes Testing on School Leadership Permit Several
    HIGH STAKES TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY MANDATES: IMPACT ON CENTRAL OFFICE LEADERSHIP A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy by Susan D. Carver December, 2008 © Copyright by Susan D. Carver 2008 All Rights Reserved A dissertation written by Susan D. Carver B.A., John Carroll University, 1994 M.Ed., Cleveland State University, 1996 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2008 Approved by _________________________, Director, Doctoral Anita M. Varrati, Ed.D. Dissertation Committee _________________________, Member, Doctoral Catherine E. Hackney Ph.D. Dissertation Committee _________________________, Member, Doctoral Diane L. Schnelker, Ph.D. Dissertation Committee Accepted by _________________________, Chairperson, Department of Teaching J. David Keller, Ph.D. Leadership and Curriculum Studies _________________________, Dean, College and Graduate School of Daniel F. Mahony, Ph.D. Education, Health, and Humans Services iii Carver, Susan D. Ph.D., December, 2008 K-12 Educational Administration HIGH STAKES TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY MANDATES: IMPACT ON CENTRAL OFFICE LEADERSHIP (252 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Anita M. Varrati, Ed.D. This qualitative study examined the ways in which K-12 central office administrators resolve the philosophical dilemma of maintaining democratic leadership strategies when federal mandates induce a more autocratic environment. Responses to two central research questions - how central office administrators are affected by the accountability and testing demands, and how they manage them - provided insight into efforts to resolve this dilemma. Interviews were conducted with four central office administrators from one school district in Ohio with a K-12 enrollment of 5,500 students.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatives on Madison Avenue: Political Advertising and Direct Marketing in the 1950S
    NANZAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES Volume 41 (2019): 3-25 Conservatives on Madison Avenue: Political Advertising and Direct Marketing in the 1950s MORIYAMA Takahito ＊ This article investigates how urban consumerism affected the rise of modern American conservatism by focusing on anticommunists’ political advertising in New York City during the 1950s. The advertising industry developed the new tactic of direct marketing in the post-World War II period and, over the years, several political activists adopted this new marketing technique for political campaigns. Direct mail, a product of the new marketing, was a personalized medium that built up a database of personal information and sent suitable messages to individuals, instead of standardized information to the masses. The medium was especially significant for conservatives to disseminate their ideology to prospective supporters across the country in the 1950s when the conservati ve media establishment did not exist. This research explores the development of the American right in urban areas by analyzing the role of direct mail in the conservative movement. The postwar era witnessed the rise of modern American conservatism as a political movement. Following World War II, anticommunism became widespread among Americans and the United States was confronted with communism abroad, whereas in domestic politics right-wing movements, such as McCarthyism, attacked liberalism. The New Deal had angered many Americans prior to the 1950s. Frustrated with government regulations since the 1930s, some businesspeople acclaimed the free enterprise system and individual liberties as the American ideal; several intellectuals and religious figures criticized the decline of traditional values in modern society; and white Southerners were adamant in preventing the federal government from interfering in the Jim Crow laws.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Policy Analysis of the Carl D. Perkins Legislation: Examining the History, Creation, Implementation and Reauthorization of the Law
    AN HISTORICAL POLICY ANALYSIS OF THE CARL D. PERKINS LEGISLATION: EXAMINING THE HISTORY, CREATION, IMPLEMENTATION AND REAUTHORIZATION OF THE LAW BY AIMEE MICHELLE LAFOLLETTE DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Policy Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Yoon Pak, Chair Professor James D. Anderson Professor Debra Bragg Associate Professor Christopher Span ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the historical development of the Carl D. Perkins Vocational Education Act of 1984, with the incorporation of ―special populations‖ as a provision in the law from 1963. From 1917 through 1963, vocational funding primarily supported teacher training, research, program improvement, and expansion of vocational programs, in 1963 acknowledging the social climate of the time Congress included provisions to support services for disadvantaged students. In 1984, Congress established prescriptive provisions attaching funds to serve and address the needs of underserved students described as special populations. Vocational education‘s focus expanded from 1963 -1984 to included provisions to create programs eliminating sexual bias and stereotyping. This dissertation traces the foundations by which Congress was led to focus on access to vocational education programs and prescribe funding to serve handicapped, single parents, displaced homemakers, economically disadvantaged, academically disadvantaged, students with limited English proficiency, and gender equity. ii To my children James and Jacob iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I believe Malcolm Gladwell, author of Tipping Point, said it best when he stated that, ―…the people we surround ourselves with have a profound effect on who we are.‖ Personal success can never be attributed to a single individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Crime and Punishment Meet the New System, Same As the Old System?
    It’s been more than a quarter-century since Congress rewrote the federal criminal code to toughen criminal sentences, abolish parole, and add drug and other crimes. Since then, federal crimes have mushroomed, and the numbers of people in federal prison has increased exponentially. Is this system the best we can do? BY JOHANNA E. MARKIND 64 • THE FEDERAL LAWYER • AUGUST 2014 Federal Crime and Punishment Meet the New System, Same as the Old System? n 1987, the Sentencing Reform Act transferred to the United States under treaty. But the Parole Commission’s principal focus is now administering parole and (SRA) eliminated parole for federal supervised release for the local District of Columbia criminal Icrimes. The U.S. Parole Commission population. had five years to phase out parole and shut The decline in federal parole has led to an explosion of federal inmates. As of March 21, 2013, the Bureau of Prisons down. Since then the commission has been (BOP) reported 217,929 prisoners in custody, around 210,000 extended several times. Most recently, Con- of whom are not eligible for parole, resulting in substantial overcrowding.3 In short, today’s federal prisons have about gress approved a five-year reauthorization 495 percent more prisoners than they did back in 1987 when bill, which the President signed into law on parole was abolished. To handle the increased volume, BOP’s Oct. 31, 2013. budget has increased exponentially, from $220 million in 1986 to $6.859 billion for fiscal year 2014, a 3,153 percent increase From a high of about 44,000 prisoners in 1987,1 the com- since the abolishing of parole.
    [Show full text]
  • He Road to Charlottesville T the 1989 Education Summit
    covers.qx4 12/2/1999 10:11 AM Page 3 he Road to Charlottesville T The 1989 Education Summit A Publication of the National Education Goals Panel covers.qx4 12/2/1999 10:11 AM Page 4 Current Members National Education Goals Panel Governors Paul E. Patton, Kentucky (D), Chairman 1999 John Engler, Michigan (R) Jim Geringer, Wyoming (R) James B. Hunt, Jr., North Carolina (D) Frank Keating, Oklahoma (R) Frank O’Bannon, Indiana (D) Tommy Thompson, Wisconsin (R) Cecil H. Underwood, West Virginia (R) Members of the Administration Michael Cohen, Special Assistant to the U.S. Secretary of Education (D) Richard W. Riley, U.S. Secretary of Education (D) Members of Congress U.S. Senator Jeff Bingaman, New Mexico (D) U.S. Senator Jim Jeffords, Vermont (R) U.S. Representative William F. Gooding, Pennsylvania (R) U.S. Representative Matthew G. Martinez, California (D) State Legislators Representative G. Spencer Coggs, Wisconsin (D) Representative Mary Lou Cowlishaw, Illinois (R) Representative Douglas R. Jones, Idaho (R) Senator Stephen Stoll, Missouri (D) Executive Director Ken Nelson negp30a.qx4 12/2/1999 10:18 AM Page iii he Road to Charlottesville T The 1989 Education Summit Maris A. Vinovskis Department of History, Institute for Social Research, and School of Public Policy University of Michigan September 1999 A Publication of the National Education Goals Panel negp30a.qx4 12/2/1999 10:18 AM Page iv Paper prepared for the National Education Goals Panel (NEGP). I am grateful to a number of individuals who have provided assistance. I want to thank Emily Wurtz of NEGP and EEI Communications in Alexandria, Virginia, for their editorial assis- tance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party and American Populism Today: Between Protest, Patriotism and Paranoia
    The American State – symposium Michael Minkenberg The Tea Party and American Populism Today: Between Protest, Patriotism and Paranoia Abstract This article takes a closer look at the Tea Party by adding a transatlantic perspective. Its aim is to show that the Tea Party is a genuine right-wing movement with strong affinities to the Republican Party which revives par- ticular American traditions of conservatism and the radical right. Its support base is not ‘the mainstream’ but a particular cross section of the white middle classes. In this, it is the American mirror image of many European parties and movements of the populist radical right which share the Tea Party’s anti-establishment message, its ultra-patriotism and ethnocentrism. It also shares some of its characteristics with the Christian Right with which it competes and cooperates when aiming at influencing the Republican Party and Washington while marking the merger of the Christian Right with Southern conservatism. Key words: Populism, American conservatism, radical right, Christian Right, Republican Party 1. Introduction “Keep your government hands off my Medicare!” (at a town hall meeting in South Carolina, quoted in Zernike 2011a, p. 135) After more than one and a half years of its existence and unmistakable presence in American politics, and of its accompanying scrutiny, the Tea Party movement remains a deeply ambivalent phenomenon. Ambivalent in terms of its independence as a movement or and its relationship to the Republican party, conservative business elites, or right-wing media; ambivalent in terms of its message, the kind of change it advocates in explicit de- marcation from the change its adherents attribute to President Obama; ambivalent about its social base as a true grass-roots or an elite-driven network of organizations and activ- ists, a middle class or cross-class movement (see Rahe 2011; Rasmussen/Schoen 2010; Williamson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Eonfmnting ]He Opposition a Child in Crisis
    I I . Nadonal NOW Times, April-May 19l8 ~~~NOW~ KNOW TfrtE OPPOSi ifri0N-Part IV continued Official Monthly Publtcatton of the (]~ NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, INC. N A T I o N A L Eleanor Cutri Smeal, President CJ!!OANt2!4TIDN Sandrill Roth, Secretary Ill Executive Committee Liaison the New High~: ...,,. wDMIIN Toni Carabillo & Judith Meuli, Edttors APRIL/MAY, 1978 An Echo No~ a Choice by Toni Carabillo Eonfmnting ]he Opposition Richard Viguerie may be the linchpin It was Rusher who then came up with of the "New" Right consortium by virtue the idea of the AlP takeover. Rusher be­ The Declaration of a State of Emer· one feminist issue-equal credit. of his computerized abil ity to churn up lieved that the situation in 1975-76 was gency on the ERA involves a comm•tment The hterature of opposition groups. money for them, but his past activities comparable to 1856, when the Repubh· of most of the resources of NOW to a once geared to single issues. now attacks suggest he would made an uncertain can Party had emerged first as a third direct confrontation with t he opposition the whole range, and in fact goes to mentor-if that's his role also. Al ong party and then as a majority party on this single issue. extraordinary and unscrupulous lengths with his more useful abilities, he has an replacing the Wh1gs . Viguerie found the By committing so much concentrated to link unrelated issues together. impulsive flair for political misadventures. theory persuasive and made the abortive effort on this one issue, do we risk losing From the ladies., auxiliaries hke Stop· In 1976, when Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • L&Sizt*O B.C. 20006V No Wovt R 0 1976, and the Enclosed Lote Txvm
    ~Y 4* Y ~44 2o L&sizt*o b.C. 20006V D~ear Ur.4tfl Tlis will acknowledge receipt of y u letter of NoWovt r 0 1976, and the enclosed lote txvm Mr. VI.wie and the Richard Viguerie fOr Voo Prouidef t - CoMmitee , 196, thcm sdon voted to terminate its inquiry into the alleged violation of 2 u.s.C. 1434(e). The Comuission determined that substantial voluntary compliance had been obtained. and accordingly, the Commission has closed its file on this matter. A copy of the Comission's determination and the S Gneral Counsel's Report is enclosed for your information. If you have any questions, please contact D&aO L. Anderson (tlephone No. 202-382-3153), the attwmey assigned to this matter. OFFICE OF GEERL COONSEL Jobos ,.MUrphy, Jr. Gemral c(ousel Enclosures DAnderson: cfb: 11/18/76 cc: Compliance Section DA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) MUR 229 (76) Richard A. Viouerie ) CERTIFICATION I, Marjorie W. Emmons, Secretary to the Federal Election Commission, do hereby certify that on December 2, 1976, the Commission determined by a vote of 5-0, that there was no reason to believe that a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, has been committed in the above-named case. Commissioner Staebler was not present. Accordingly, the file in this matter is now closed. Ma jorie W. Emmons Secre ary to the Commission F.- L u , BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION In the Matter of )MUR 229 (76) Richard A. Viguerie) GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT I.
    [Show full text]