Studies on Issues in Political Economy Since the Global Financial Crisis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Studies on Issues in Political Economy Since the Global Financial Crisis A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Jäger, Kai Research Report Studies on Issues in Political Economy since the Global Financial Crisis ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, No. 71 Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Jäger, Kai (2016) : Studies on Issues in Political Economy since the Global Financial Crisis, ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, No. 71, ISBN 978-3-95942-020-4, ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/167368 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ifo Beiträge 71 zur Wirtschaftsforschung Studies on Issues in Political Economy since the Global Financial Crisis Kai Jäger Institut Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München e.V. Herausgeber der Reihe: Clemens Fuest Schriftleitung: Chang Woon Nam ifo Beiträge 71 zur Wirtschaftsforschung Studies on Issues in Political Economy since the Global Financial Crisis Kai Jäger Institut Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München e.V. Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar ISBN-13: 978-3-95942-020-4 Alle Rechte, insbesondere das der Übersetzung in fremde Sprachen, vorbehalten. Ohne ausdrückliche Genehmigung des Verlags ist es auch nicht gestattet, dieses Buch oder Teile daraus auf photomechanischem Wege (Photokopie, Mikrokopie) oder auf andere Art zu vervielfältigen. © ifo Institut, München 2016 Druck: ifo Institut, München ifo Institut im Internet: http://www.cesifo-group.de Preface This dissertation was prepared by Kai Jäger while he was working at the Ifo Institute. It was completed in June 2016 and accepted as a doctoral thesis by the Department of Economics at the University of Munich in November 2016. It includes four studies broadly connected to the causes and consequences of the Global Financial Crisis of 2007- 8 from a political economy perspective. Chapter 2 analyzes the political roots of massive foreign reserves accumulation, which has contributed to the American credit boom before the financial crisis. The study shows that elections tend to explain why democracies have acquired less foreign reserves than authoritarian regimes. Basel III was a regulatory consequence of the Global Financial Crisis, which is scheduled to impose liquidity requirements as a prudential measure for commercial banks. Chapter 3 examines whether these liquidity requirements could have an unintended negative effect on monetary stability. Based on a new dataset of reserve and liquidity requirements, the results show that inflation is more robust to changes in the velocity of money if reserve and liquidity requirements are low. Increases in the velocity of money are associated with higher inflation rates if reserve and liquidity requirements are high. The ability of partisan politics to shape economic policies according to ideolog- ical goals has been regularly questioned in an era of globalization and austerity. Chapter 4 suggests that government ideology still has a pronounced impact on economic policy- making based on a sample of OECD and new EU member states. Chapter 5 analyzes why major business leaders in France and Germany have publicly supported the euro in the weeks before a bailout program got enacted by the European Council in July 2011. The study shows that direct corporate interest did not appear to matter. Instead, business lead- ers appeared to be more likely to join the campaign if they were well-connected in busi- ness and political networks. The findings suggest that managers disregarded their short- term economic interest to improve their long-term ties with political decision-makers. Keywords: Financial Crisis, Political Economy, Foreign Reserves, Political Busi- ness Cycle Theory, Veto Players, Basel III, Reserve Requirements, Money Demand, Price Stability, Partisan Politics, Economic Freedom, Euro, Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Social Network Analysis. JEL-Codes: D72, D85, E5, E41, F31, H1, H5. Acknowledgement I am grateful to Niklas Potrafke for chairing my dissertation and to Michael Munger for remaining “aboard” and being my second reviewer. I appreciate that I could rely on both for their continuous support. I would also like to thank Christoph Trebesch for agreeing to be my third reviewer. In addition to Professor Potrafke, I would also like to thank my colleagues at the Ifo Institute, who made my short stay in Munich pleasant: Manuela Krause, Marina Riem, Philipp Kaiser, Björn Kauder, Pepe, Markus Reischmann, Christoph Schinke, Horst Schwemmer, and our team assistant Sabine Kolbinger. I would also like to express my deep gratitude to Jeff Friedman and Jeff Hummel from whom I have learnt a lot. I am also grateful to the Institute of Humane Studies and the Charles Koch Foundation for their generous financial support throughout my graduate career. Last but not least, I would like to thank my family and friends for their love and sup- port. Studies on Issues in Political Economy since the Global Financial Crisis Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Doctor oeconomiae publicae (Dr. oec. publ.) an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München 2016 vorgelegt von Kai Jäger Referent: Prof. Dr. Niklas Potrafke Korreferent: Prof. Michael C. Munger, Ph.D. Promotionsabschlussberatung: 16. November 2016 i Contents 1 Introduction 1 References 10 2 The Role of Regime Type in the Political Economy of Foreign Reserve 13 Accumulation 2.1 Introduction 14 2.2 The benefits and cost of foreign reserve accumulation 17 2.3 Institutional explanations for reserve accumulation 21 2.4 Empirical section 27 2.5 Conclusion 39 References 41 Appendix: Additional tables 48 3 Solving Milton Friedman’s Conundrum on Price Stability: The Ne- 53 glected Role of Reserve Requirements 3.1 Introduction 54 3.2 The evolving functions of reserve requirements 57 3.3 Solving Friedman’s Conundrum: How deregulating reserve require- 61 ments foster price stability 3.4 Empirical section 65 3.5 Conclusion 76 References 78 Appendix: Additional tables 83 ii 4 Economic Freedom in the Early 21st Century: Government Ideology 95 Still Matters 4.1 Introduction 96 4.2 Does government ideology still matter? 97 4.3 Drawing a more comprehensive picture: Economic freedom and gov- 99 ernment ideology 4.4 Empirical analysis 104 4.5 Conclusion 113 References 115 Appendix: Additional tables 119 5 Sources of Franco-German Corporate Support for the Euro: The Ef- 123 fects of Business Network Centrality and Political Connections 5.1 Introduction 124 5.2 Corporate interest in the establishment of EMU 125 5.3 The advent of the Euro crisis and the campaign “The Euro is neces- 127 sary” 5.4 Theoretical explanations 127 5.5 Data and methods 134 5.6 Empirical analysis 141 5.7 Conclusion 145 References 147 Appendix: Additional tables 152 6 Concluding Remarks 155 iii List of Figures 1.1 Change of foreign reserves in EMEs and current accounts of the United 2 States and EMEs in billions (USD), 1997-2013 1.2 Comparative development of reserve requirements, 1990-2013 4 1.3 Business network of French and German CEOs in 2011 8 2.1 Development of global foreign reserves, 1980-2013 14 2.2 Simulated effects on changes in reserves/GDP 34 2.3 Marginal effect of an upcoming election conditional on the number of 36 veto players in democracies based on Table 2.3, model 3 2.4 Marginal effect of an upcoming election conditional on the number of 36 veto players in authoritarian regimes based on Table 2.3, model 5. 3.1 The relationship between inflation and velocity of M2 in the United 54 States, 1959-2013 3.2 Global development of reserve requirements, 1990-2013 (monthly aver- 58 ages) 3.3 The velocity offsetting effect 62 3.4 Money multiplier effect and reserve requirements 64 3.5 Marginal effect of a percentage change in velocity on changes in 72 M2/GDP conditional on reserve requirements based on Table 3.2, model 4. 3.6 Marginal effect of a percentage change in velocity on the inflation rate 73 conditional on reserve requirements based on Table 3.3, model 4. 4.1 Average development of modified EFW Index and of the three policy 104 areas 4.2 Mean changes in EFW
Recommended publications
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 19 Września 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04)
    C 107/84 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 26.3.2021 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 19 WRZEŚNIA 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 87 2. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (złożone projekty rezolucji) . 87 3. Składanie dokumentów . 87 4. Debata na temat przypadków naruszania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (debata) . 88 4.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach . 88 4.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów . 89 4.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 89 obywatelstwie . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 90 6. Skład komisji i delegacji . 90 7. Głosowanie . 90 7.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach 90 (głosowanie) . 7.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów (głosowanie) . 91 7.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 92 obywatelstwie (głosowanie) . 7.4. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (głosowanie) . 92 7.5. Znaczenie pamięci o przeszłości Europy dla jej przyszłości (głosowanie) . 93 7.6. Stan wdrażania przepisów dotyczących przeciwdziałania praniu pieniędzy (głosowanie) . 94 8. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 94 9. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 94 10. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 94 11. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 95 26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/85 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 12. Skład komisji i delegacji . 95 13. Zagrożenie statusu służb ochotniczej straży pożarnej w Unii Europejskiej (debata) .
    [Show full text]
  • WQ3 Mass Arrests of LGBTI Activists in Poland .Pdf
    Question for written answer E-004735/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Pierre Karleskind (Renew), Sophia in 't Veld (Renew), Fredrick Federley (Renew), Karen Melchior (Renew), Nicolae Ştefănuță (Renew), Moritz Körner (Renew), Maite Pagazaurtundúa (Renew), Samira Rafaela (Renew), Radka Maxová (Renew), Liesje Schreinemacher (Renew), Abir Al-Sahlani (Renew), Anna Júlia Donáth (Renew), Irène Tolleret (Renew), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Anne-Sophie Pelletier (GUE/NGL), Isabel Carvalhais (S&D), Monika Vana (Verts/ALE), Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Gabriele Bischoff (S&D), Delara Burkhardt (S&D), Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (S&D), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Grace O'Sullivan (Verts/ALE), Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Verts/ALE), Eleonora Evi (NI), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Maria Arena (S&D), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE), Arba Kokalari (PPE), Pascal Durand (Renew), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), Catherine Chabaud (Renew), Ilana Cicurel (Renew), Evelyne Gebhardt (S&D), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Mauri Pekkarinen (Renew), Billy Kelleher (Renew), Andrus Ansip (Renew), Irena Joveva (Renew), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Asger Christensen (Renew), Martin Hojsík (Renew), María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Stéphane Bijoux (Renew), José Ramón Bauzá Díaz (Renew), Stéphane Séjourné (Renew), Svenja Hahn (Renew), Marianne Vind (S&D), Katalin Cseh (Renew), Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marie-Pierre Vedrenne (Renew), Henna Virkkunen (PPE), Jan- Christoph Oetjen (Renew), Claudia Gamon (Renew), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Birgit Sippel (S&D), Ramona Strugariu (Renew), Isabel Santos (S&D), Valérie Hayer (Renew), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Maria Walsh (PPE), Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D), Linea Søgaard-Lidell (Renew), Mario Furore (NI), Clara Aguilera (S&D), Alice Kuhnke (Verts/ALE), Pär Holmgren (Verts/ALE), Jakop G.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release 15-01-2019 - 18:28 Reference No: 20190109IPR23015
    Press release 15-01-2019 - 18:28 Reference No: 20190109IPR23015 Romanian Presidency of the Council: debate with Prime Minister Viorica Dăncilă Competitiveness, digitization, protection and the safety of citizens will be the focus of the Romanian presidency of the Council, said Prime Minister Dăncilă. During the next six months, the Romanian presidency will aim for better political and economic cohesion between member states and will commit to work towards reducing development gaps between regions, supporting economic growth and digitization, especially for European industry. Coherent management of migration flows, strengthening the EU’s external borders and a better protection of citizens in virtual space will also be work priorities in the first semester of 2019. Setting up and even extending the mandate of the European Prosecutor’s Office to include terrorist offenses and better cooperation between countries of origin and transit countries on migration issues will also be on the agenda. The Prime Minister underlined the Romanian government’s commitment to move forward on EU enlargement matters, with particular attention paid to the Western Balkans and a focus on common European values. MEPs of all political groups underlined that they stood ready to work hand in hand with the presidency to move forward on European legislative matters in priority areas, pointing out that the Romanian government must do more to promote European values by being more politically stable and consistent. To watch videos of speakers’ statements, click on the
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • 074902/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt Am 13/09/19
    074902/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt am 13/09/19 Council of the European Union General Secretariat Brussels, 13 September 2019 CM 3975/19 OJ CRP1 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROVISIONAL AGENDA PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE (Part 1) Justus Lipsius building, Brussels 18 September 2019 (10.15) Discussion items (II) Competitiveness Meeting of the Council (Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space)) on 26 and 27 September 2019: Preparation Internal Market and Industry 11965/19 Developing our economic base: a) Vision for a long-term strategy on sustainable growth Presentation by the Presidency b) Competitiveness "check-up" Presentation by the Commission Policy debate Research 11965/19 Developing our economic base: Vision for a long-term strategy on sustainable growth Policy debate Horizon Europe Package: Synergies with other programmes 12043/19 Policy debate Environment Meeting of the Council (Environment) on 4 October 2019: Agenda CM 3975/19 1 Contact: [email protected] EN www.parlament.gv.at Internal Market and Industry Appointment of the Deputy Executive Director of the European Union 11931/19 Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) PI Examination of the candidatures Any other business Communication on the 2019 UN Climate Action Summit Information from the Commission CM 3975/19 2 EN www.parlament.gv.at ANNEX Non-discussion items (I) Institutional Affairs Written questions Replies to questions for written answer submitted to the Council by 12129/19 Members of the European Parliament PE-QE Adoption by silence procedure
    [Show full text]
  • 1 December 2016 European Commission Vice-President Andrus Ansip Commissioner Günther Oettinger EU Free Flow of Data Initiative
    1 December 2016 European Commission Vice-President Andrus Ansip Commissioner Günther Oettinger EU Free Flow of Data Initiative Dear Vice-President Ansip, Dear Commissioner Oettinger, We are writing to you as digital startups and scaleups from across Europe -- from Italy, Spain, Belgium, the UK and Estonia – who are working hard to grow. We believe a modern digital economy and society cannot thrive without an open borderless world when it comes to data. Data-driven innovation is underpinned by the flow free of data across borders. That is why we the undersigned support the Commission’s ambition to pursue legislative action to end unjustified data localisation restrictions that are a barrier to the free movement of data. Existing national barriers, both direct and indirect, to the free flow of data undermine our ability to grow and scale. Existing localisation requirements require the replication of business structures and processes within the single market. European startups have bold ambitions but often face a patchwork of national laws that is an active disincentive for startups who looK to build and scale their business in Europe. In light of recent reports on the future of data localisation proposals we are writing to urge the Commission to remain resolute on this issue given the economic impact on data-driven startups of not removing existing inappropriate and misplaced data localisation requirements. As the Commission’s own Free Flow of Data Initiative impact assessment noted the removal of data localisation restrictions would add an estimated 8 billion Euros per year to the European economy. This is not just an issue that impacts the startups but all sectors of the European economy that stand to gain from Europe’s transformation to a data-driven economy.
    [Show full text]
  • CALENDRIER Du 15 Au 21 Février 2016 Brussels, 12 February 2016 (Susceptible De Modifications En Cours De Semaine)
    European Commission - Weekly activities CALENDRIER du 15 au 21 février 2016 Brussels, 12 February 2016 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Déplacements et visites Lundi 15 février Foreign Affairs Council, in Brussels. Agriculture and Fisheries Council, in Brussels. President Jean-Claude Juncker receives a delegation of AEGIS Europe and EUROFER. President Jean-Claude Juncker receives Mr Dacian Cioloș, Prime Minister of Romania. President Jean-Claude Juncker receives Mr Kurt Beck, President of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation. Mr Frans Timmermans receives Mr Dacian Ciolos, Prime Minister of Romania. Mr Frans Timmermans receives Mr Gebran Bassil, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Lebanon. Mr Frans Timmermans receives Mr Augusto Santos Silva, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Portugal. Mr Frans Timmermans receives Mr Linas Linkevičius, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Lithuania. Ms Federica Mogherini chairs the Foreign Affairs Council, in Brussels. Mr Johannes Hahn also attends. Ms Federica Mogherini holds a bilateral meeting with Mr Taavi Rõivas, Prime Minister of Estonia, in Brussels. Ms Federica Mogherini hosts a working dinner with Mr Mohammad Javad Zarif, Foreign Minister of Islamic Republic of Iran. Ms Kristalina Georgieva receives Mr Dacian Cioloș, Prime Minister of Romania. Mr Andrus Ansip receives Mr Alberto Calcagno, CEO of Fastweb. Mr Andrus Ansip and Mr Carlos Moedas receive Ms Neelie Kroes, former European Commission Vice President and CEO of Startup Delta. Mr Maroš Šefčovič in Paris, France: gives a speech at the International Energy Agency; gives a lecture at Sciences Po University. Mr Maroš Šefčovič delivers a speech at the event to celebrate the North Sea Link interconnector between the UK and Norway, Norway House, in Brussels.
    [Show full text]
  • Download All with Our Work on a Daily Basis, All Year Round
    EUROPEAN LIBERAL FORUM ANNUAL REPORT 2016 WELCOME ANNUAL REPORT 2016 EUROPEAN LIBERAL FORUM COPYRIGHT 2017 EUROPEAN LIBERAL© FORUM ASBL. All rights reserved. Content is subject to copyright. Any use and re-use requires approval. This publication was co-funded by the European Parliament. The European Parliament is not responsible for the content of this publication, or for any use that may be made of it. WELCOME CONTENTS THE ELF ANNUAL REPORT 2016 WELCOME 02 Letter From the President 04 Foreword by the Executive Director 05 GET TO KNOW US 06 Our Brochures | Connect With Us 07 Where Did You Meet Us in 2016? 08 OUR FOCUS 09 SECURITY EU Defence and Security Policies – Making Europe Safer for Citizens 10 ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Europe’s Energy Future 12 MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION Liberal Answers to Challenges on Sea Liberal Answers to Challenges on Land Integration Through Education 14 EUROPEAN VALUES Ralf Dahrendorf Roundtable: Talk for Europe 16 DIGITALISATION Digital Security Duet: Making European Cyber Defences More Resilient Through Public-Private Partnerships 18 List of all projects 20 List of Ralf Dahrendorf Roundtables 2016 21 Photos 22 ABOUT US 31 Member Organisations 32 List of all Member Organisations 70 The Board of Directors 72 The Secretariat 75 Imprint 77 3 EUROPEAN LIBERAL FORUM / ANNUAL REPORT 2016 WELCOME WELCOME LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT DR JÜRGEN MARTENS The unpredictable and sud- stitutions and for a way to move den political changes that 2016 forward. brought caught all of us in Eu- rope off guard. Brexit, the elec- At ELF, we seek to inspire and tion of Donald Trump as President support these developments.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov
    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 is awarded Background briefing In the next 10 days, the nominations of the Sakharov Prize for Human Rights will be decided by the European Parliament. The prize is awarded to “honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.”1 Previous winners include Nelson Mandela, Reporters without Borders and Anatoli Marchenko. If you believe that Azerbaijani human rights defenders – who are now in jail following years of work on behalf of the rights of others, and most recently on a list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan (on which they are now included) – then let the MEPs who vote on this know. Nominations for the Sakharov Prize can be made by: Political groups in the European Parliament. Or At least 40 MEPs. The deadline for nominations is Thursday 18 September at 12:00 in Strasbourg. NOTE: In order to decide on a nominee from their group some political groups have internal deadlines in the course of the next week. The next days are crucial. We focus here on four important political groups which might to support this nomination: The EPP Social Democrats Liberals Greens 1Source: The European Union website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-for-Freedom-of-Thought.html 2 Once the nominations are been made, the Foreign Affairs and Development committees vote on a shortlist of three finalists. This happens on either Monday 6th or Tuesday 7th October 2014. The members list for the foreign affairs committee can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afet/members.html, while the development committee is here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/deve/members.html#menuzone.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Trust in Brussels: Lobbying Strategies of Nordic Interest Groups
    Building Trust in Brussels: Lobbying Strategies of Nordic Interest Groups Sara Alvsaker Master’s thesis Spring 2020 Department of Comparative Politics University of Bergen Abstract In their pursuit of influencing EU institutions and decision-makers, Nordic interest groups face the choice of directly contacting the decision-makers or generating pressure indirectly through mobilizing and/or changing the public opinion. After choosing their policy issues, interest groups have to determine to either lobby alone or to join coalitions. This thesis investigates the lobbying strategies chosen by Nordic interest groups that are registered in the EU Transparency Register. I build my theoretical argument on a prominent school of thought that claims that resource-rich interest groups are more likely to choose inside lobbying strategies compared to resource-poor groups. The argument is tested through a mixed methodological approach, combining the analyses of a built for purpose dataset that provides information about all Nordic interest groups registered in the EU Transparency register. The empirical analyses show that a considerable fraction of the Nordic interest groups chooses inside lobbying strategies and/or outside lobbying strategies. However, the online survey answers reveal that a large majority prefers to lobby in coalitions. Additionally, it seems that Norwegian interest groups focus on outside lobbying as well as inside lobbying strategies (mostly targeting the Commission), to compensate for their lack of representation in the EU institutions. While lobbying resources and group characteristics matter to the choice of most lobbying strategies, the aspect of building reputation and trust is of importance when it comes to all lobbying strategies applied by the Nordic interest groups.
    [Show full text]
  • New European Commission Overview of Nominations by Member State
    New European Commission Overview of nominations by Member State This document includes a summary of the names that have been speculated to be nominated by their national governments for the next mandate of the European Commission starting in autumn 2014. Both official nominations, as well as rumoured politicians as possible nominations are listed. Also, the desired portfolio is added for those Member States that have expressed it. Please note that official nominations by the Member States will continue over the next weeks in view of the special European Council on 30th of August, while the Commissioners will have to be vetted by the European Parliament through hearings with all nominated candidates. [Update: August 1] © European Union, 2014 List of countries: Austria Germany Poland Belgium Greece Portugal Bulgaria Hungary Romania Croatia Ireland Slovakia Cyprus Italy Slovenia Czech Republic Latvia Spain Denmark Lithuania Sweden Estonia Luxembourg United Kingdom Finland Malta France Netherlands ↑: candidates with increased possibilities Kristalina Georgieva ↑ European Commissioner Gergana Passy ex. Europe Minister Johannes Hahn Austria European Commissioner Bulgaria Sergei Stanishev MEP, ex. Prime Minister Official nomination Kristian Vigenin Foreign affairs Minister Desired portfolio: Foreign affairs Karel De Gucht European Commissioner Belgium Marianne Thyssen ↑ Neven Mimica MEP Croatia European Commissioner Didier Reynders Foreign affairs Minister Official nomination Mette Gjerskov MP, ex. Agriculture Minister Christos Stylianides Cyprus MEP Denmark Christine Antorini Education Minister Desired portfolio: Foreign affairs Czech Věra Jourová Estonia Andrus Ansip Republic Regional development Minister MEP, ex. Prime Minister Desired/possible portfolio: Desired portfolio: Transport, Regional affairs, Industry, Economic, finance Institutional relations, Digital agenda Official nomination Official nomination Jyrki Katainen Günther Oettinger Finland ex.
    [Show full text]
  • VICE-PRESIDENT Andrus Ansip COMMISSIONER Günther Oettinger European Commission Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Belgium
    VICE-PRESIDENT Andrus Ansip COMMISSIONER Günther Oettinger European Commission Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Belgium Joint Letter from Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Ireland,Finland, Lithuania, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom. Dear Vice-President Ansip and Commissioner Oettinger Electronic communications are essential to a successful and competitive European Digital Single Market and to Europe’s strong position globally as a place to live and do business. We believe that the Electronic Communications Framework must continue to support the provision of electronic communications that make the most of the latest technology in order to contribute to economic growth and keep up with demand from Europe’s consumers and businesses. The European Commission’s review of the framework is a welcome opportunity to ensure the regulatory framework remains fit for purpose within this context. We are therefore writing to you to set out some of our priorities for the review. Some of the signatories to this letter have also signed up to a non-paper setting out broader policy positions. The framework must support the deployment of electronic communications services and networks that meet the needs of users. As connectivity becomes increasingly essential for business and personal activities, users are expecting a higher standard of quality across all aspects of network performance. Reliability, bandwidth capacity, latency and resilience, are becoming just as important as connection speed to the user experience. In order to drive up standards of network performance, the quality of the user’s experience should be a key consideration for the framework. The framework should continue to adhere to the principle of technological neutrality.
    [Show full text]