DOCSLIB.ORG

Enrichment and Characterization of Methanogenic Hydrocarbon-Degrading Microbial Communities in Different Ecosystems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enrichment and Characterization of Methanogenic Hydrocarbon-Degrading Microbial Communities in Different Ecosystems Enrichment and characterization of methanogenic hydrocarbon-degrading microbial communities in different ecosystems Von der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover zur Erlangung des Grades DOKTORIN DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN Dr. rer. nat. genehmigte Dissertation von Diplom-Biologin Friederike Marie Luise Gründger geboren am 27. Februar 1982 in Weimar 2014 Referent: Prof. Dr. Axel Schippers Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Thomas Brüser Tag der Promotion: 4. April 2014 Schlagworte: mikrobielle Diversität, anaerober Kohlenwasserstoffabbau, Methanogenese Key words: microbial diversity, anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation, methanogenesis Contents Zusammenfassung .................................................................................................................... 7 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 8 List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................. 9 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Hydrocarbons........................................................................................................... 12 1.1.1. Structure and natural occurrence ...................................................................... 12 1.1.2. The formation of crude oil and natural gas ...................................................... 14 1.1.3. The formation of coal ....................................................................................... 16 1.1.4. Methane – the simplest hydrocarbon ............................................................... 17 1.1.5. Isotope composition of methane and carbon dioxide and fractionation processes .......................................................................................................................... 19 1.2. The biodegradation of hydrocarbons ....................................................................... 21 1.2.1. Aerobic hydrocarbon degradation .................................................................... 21 1.2.2. Anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation ................................................................ 22 1.2.3. Microbiological anaerobic hydrocarbon activation .......................................... 25 1.2.4. Syntrophic interactions and in situ hydrocarbon biodegradation ..................... 29 1.2.5. Hydrocarbon biodegradation in petroleum reservoirs ...................................... 30 1.2.6. Hydrocarbon biodegradation in coal deposits .................................................. 35 1.3. Methanogenic processes .......................................................................................... 38 1.3.1. Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis .................................................................. 38 1.3.2. Acetoclastic methanogenesis ............................................................................ 39 1.3.3. Methylotrophic methanogenesis ...................................................................... 39 1.3.4. The seventh order of methanogens ................................................................... 40 1.3.5. Enzymatic reactions during methanogenesis ................................................... 40 1.3.6. Cultivation methods and phylogenetic analysis of anaerobic microbes .......... 44 1.4. Motivation and main objectives of this work .......................................................... 46 1.5. Overview of publications and author contributions ................................................ 47 2. Evidence for in situ methanogenic oil degradation in the Dagang oil field ................... 52 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 54 2.2. Materials and methods/experimental details ........................................................... 55 2.2.1. Site description ................................................................................................. 55 2.2.2. Sampling and establishment of microcosms .................................................... 56 2.2.3. Analytical methods (isotopes and headspace gases) ........................................ 58 2.2.4. Gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry of oil ............................................... 58 2.2.5. Assessment of oil degradation .......................................................................... 59 2.2.6. Molecular methods ........................................................................................... 60 2.3. Results ..................................................................................................................... 60 2.3.1. Oil chemical analysis ....................................................................................... 60 2.3.2. Gas analysis ...................................................................................................... 64 2.3.3. Microbial abundance ........................................................................................ 66 2.3.4. In vitro methane production from labeled hydrocarbons ................................. 68 2.4. Discussion ................................................................................................................ 69 2.4.1. The microbiological potential of the Dagang oilfield for in situ methane production ......................................................................................................... 69 2.4.2. Chemical evidence for in situ oil biodegradation ............................................. 72 2.5. Appendix ................................................................................................................. 74 3. Microbial methane formation in deep aquifers of a coal-bearing sedimentary basin, Germany ......................................................................................................................... 78 3 3.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 80 3.2. Materials and methods ............................................................................................. 81 3.2.1. Sampling and sample preparation .................................................................... 81 3.2.2. Cultivation methods ......................................................................................... 82 3.2.3. Analytical methods ........................................................................................... 83 3.2.4. Molecular biological methods .......................................................................... 83 3.3. Results ..................................................................................................................... 85 3.3.1. Geochemical characterization of groundwater samples ................................... 85 3.3.2. Isotopic signatures of gasses from coal-rich sediments ................................... 86 3.3.3. Methanogenic and hydrocarbon degradation activity ...................................... 88 3.3.4. Quantification of microbial groups .................................................................. 88 3.3.5. Phylogenetic analysis of the microbial community composition ..................... 90 3.4. Discussion ................................................................................................................ 97 3.4.1. Geochemical links between groundwater and coal-bearing sediments ............ 97 3.4.2. The bacterial community in groundwater ........................................................ 99 3.4.3. The archaeal community in groundwater ....................................................... 101 3.4.4. The bacterial community in the coal-rich sediments and derived enrichment cultures ........................................................................................................... 102 3.4.5. The archaeal community in coal-rich sediments and derived enrichment cultures ........................................................................................................................ 104 3.5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 105 4. Similar features of microbial consortia from different ecosystems degrading hexadecane under methanogenic conditions .................................................................................... 108 4.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 110 4.2. Experimental procedures ....................................................................................... 112 4.2.1. Sample description and experimental set-up .................................................. 112 4.2.2. Analytical methods ......................................................................................... 113 4.2.3. Molecular biological methods ........................................................................ 115 4.3. Results ................................................................................................................... 117 4.3.1. Microbial activities ......................................................................................... 117 4.3.2. Physiological aspects .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Differences in Lateral Gene Transfer in Hypersaline Versus Thermal Environments Matthew E Rhodes1*, John R Spear2, Aharon Oren3 and Christopher H House1
    Rhodes et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:199 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/199 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Differences in lateral gene transfer in hypersaline versus thermal environments Matthew E Rhodes1*, John R Spear2, Aharon Oren3 and Christopher H House1 Abstract Background: The role of lateral gene transfer (LGT) in the evolution of microorganisms is only beginning to be understood. While most LGT events occur between closely related individuals, inter-phylum and inter-domain LGT events are not uncommon. These distant transfer events offer potentially greater fitness advantages and it is for this reason that these “long distance” LGT events may have significantly impacted the evolution of microbes. One mechanism driving distant LGT events is microbial transformation. Theoretically, transformative events can occur between any two species provided that the DNA of one enters the habitat of the other. Two categories of microorganisms that are well-known for LGT are the thermophiles and halophiles. Results: We identified potential inter-class LGT events into both a thermophilic class of Archaea (Thermoprotei) and a halophilic class of Archaea (Halobacteria). We then categorized these LGT genes as originating in thermophiles and halophiles respectively. While more than 68% of transfer events into Thermoprotei taxa originated in other thermophiles, less than 11% of transfer events into Halobacteria taxa originated in other halophiles. Conclusions: Our results suggest that there is a fundamental difference between LGT in thermophiles and halophiles. We theorize that the difference lies in the different natures of the environments. While DNA degrades rapidly in thermal environments due to temperature-driven denaturization, hypersaline environments are adept at preserving DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Representatives of a Novel Archaeal Phylum Or a Fast-Evolving
    Open Access Research2005BrochieretVolume al. 6, Issue 5, Article R42 Nanoarchaea: representatives of a novel archaeal phylum or a comment fast-evolving euryarchaeal lineage related to Thermococcales? Celine Brochier*, Simonetta Gribaldo†, Yvan Zivanovic‡, Fabrice Confalonieri‡ and Patrick Forterre†‡ Addresses: *EA EGEE (Evolution, Génomique, Environnement) Université Aix-Marseille I, Centre Saint-Charles, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille, Cedex 3, France. †Unite Biologie Moléculaire du Gène chez les Extremophiles, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex ‡ 15, France. Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, UMR CNRS 8621, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France. reviews Correspondence: Celine Brochier. E-mail: [email protected]. Simonetta Gribaldo. E-mail: [email protected] Published: 14 April 2005 Received: 3 December 2004 Revised: 10 February 2005 Genome Biology 2005, 6:R42 (doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r42) Accepted: 9 March 2005 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://genomebiology.com/2005/6/5/R42 reports © 2005 Brochier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Placement<p>Anteins from analysis 25of Nanoarcheumarchaeal of the positiongenomes equitans of suggests Nanoarcheum in the that archaeal N. equitans phylogeny inis likethe lyarchaeal to be the phylogeny representative using aof large a fast-evolving dataset of concatenatedeuryarchaeal ribosomalineage.</p>l pro- deposited research Abstract Background: Cultivable archaeal species are assigned to two phyla - the Crenarchaeota and the Euryarchaeota - by a number of important genetic differences, and this ancient split is strongly supported by phylogenetic analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dissertation 4-7-09.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering IMPROVED ANAEROBIC DIGESTER STABILITY TO ORGANIC LOADING RATE SHOCKS WITH THE USE OF AN ENVIRONMENTALLY DERIVED INOCULUM A Dissertation in Environmental Engineering and Biogeochemistry by Lisa Marie Steinberg © 2009 Lisa Marie Steinberg Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2009 The dissertation of Lisa Marie Steinberg was reviewed and approved* by the following: John Regan Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Christopher House Associate Professor of Geosciences Bruce Logan Kappe Professor of Environmental Engineering Jenn Macalady Assistant Professor of Geosciences Peggy Johnson Department Head and Professor of Civil Engineering *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ABSTRACT Anaerobic digestion broadly describes technology that utilizes microorganisms to break down organic matter under anaerobic conditions through the coordinated efforts of several trophic groups of microorganisms. The last step is catalyzed by methanogens which produce primarily methane, carbon dioxide, and water as products of metabolism. Anaerobic digestion occurs naturally in a variety of water-saturated sediments, but is also used to treat waste in constructed reactors. There are a number of advantages to treating waste with anaerobic digestion, but perhaps the greatest is that waste treatment can be coupled to energy generation by the production of a methane-rich biogas. Despite the advantages, anaerobic digestion is severely under-utilized in waste treatment mainly due to the belief that anaerobic digesters are less stable than aerobic treatment processes. Anaerobic digesters are typically operated under warm temperatures and circumneutral pH, with operation outside of these conditions leading to instability and potential reactor failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology, Ecology, and Biotechnological Applications of Anaerobic Bacteria Adapted to Environmental Stresses in Temperature, Ph, Salinity, Or Substrates SUSAN E
    MICROBIOLOGIcAL REVIEWS, June, 1993, p. 451-509 Vol. 57, No. 2 0146-0749/93/020451-59$02.00/0 Copyright X) 1993, American Society for Microbiology Biology, Ecology, and Biotechnological Applications of Anaerobic Bacteria Adapted to Environmental Stresses in Temperature, pH, Salinity, or Substrates SUSAN E. LOWE,lt* MAHENDRA K. JAIN,2 AND J. GREGORY ZEIKUS1'2'3 Department ofBiochemistry' and Department ofMicrobiology and Public Health,3 Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, and Michigan Biotechnology Institute, Lansing, Michigan 489092 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 453 THERMOPHILES .......................................................................... 454 Ecology, Diversity, and Taxonomy........................................................................... 454 Physiology, Biochemistry, and Genetics ........................................................................... 461 Downloaded from Overview.......................................................................... 461 Catabolism and autotrophy of methanogens and acetogens.......................................................461 (i) Methanogenesis and autotrophy........................................................................... 461 (ii) Acetogenesis and autotrophy of C. thermoaceticum .........................................................462 (iii) Novel properties of sulfur/sulfate/thiosulfate reducers and other species..............................462 Ethanolic fermentation of saccharides..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DNA-DNA Hybridization of Methylotrophic Halophilic
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNALOF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY,OCt. 1991, p. 558-562 Vol. 41, No. 4 0020-7713/91/040558-05$02.OO/O DNA-DNA Hybridization of Methylotrophic Halophilic Methanogenic Bacteria and Transfer of Methanococcus halophilusvPto the Genus Methanuhalophilus as Methanohaluphilus halophilus comb. nov. T. WILHARM,l T. N. ZHILINA,’* AND P. HUMMEL’ Lehrstuhl fur Mikrobiologie der Universitat Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, and Institute of Microbiology of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, USSR’ Twelve strains of halophilic, methylotrophic, methanogenic bacteria, including the type strains of the validly published species Methanohalophilus mahii, Methanohalophilus zhilinae, and Methanohalobium evestigatum, as well as the type strain of Methanococcus halophilus, were compared on the basis of DNA-DNA hybridization and phenotypic characteristics. Two groups (moderately halophilic Methanohalophilus strains and extremely halophilic Methanohalobium strains) were formed on the basis of G+ C contents and DNA-DNA hybridization data. Type strain SLP of Methanohalophilus mahii and type strain 2-7982 of Methanococcus halophilus exhibited 87% sequence similarity and belong to the same genus (Methanohalophilus), if not to the same species. A regulation of the International Code of Nomenclature of BacteriQ implies that the specific epithet halophilus has priority by validation and should be retained. Therefore, we propose that Methanococcus halophilus should be transferred to the genus Methanohalophilus as Methanohalophilus halophilus comb. nov. (type strain, strain 2-7982 [= DSM 3094 = OCM 1601); an emended description is given. Moderately halophilic strains TR-7,2-7404, and 2-7405, which were isolated from geographically separated sites, exhibited high levels of DNA-DNA hybridization with Methanohalophilus mahii and might be regarded as strains of the same Methanohalophilus species.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling the Methanopyrus Kandleri Paradox Céline Brochier*, Patrick Forterre† and Simonetta Gribaldo†
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central Open Access Research2004BrochieretVolume al. 5, Issue 3, Article R17 Archaeal phylogeny based on proteins of the transcription and comment translation machineries: tackling the Methanopyrus kandleri paradox Céline Brochier*, Patrick Forterre† and Simonetta Gribaldo† Addresses: *Equipe Phylogénomique, Université Aix-Marseille I, Centre Saint-Charles, 13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France. †Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, CNRS UMR 8621, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France. reviews Correspondence: Céline Brochier. E-mail: [email protected] Published: 26 February 2004 Received: 14 November 2003 Revised: 5 January 2004 Genome Biology 2004, 5:R17 Accepted: 21 January 2004 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://genomebiology.com/2004/5/3/R17 reports © 2004 Brochier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. ArchaealPhylogeneticsequencedusingrespectively). two phylogeny concatenated genomes, analysis based it of is datasetsthe now on Archaea proteinspossible consisting has ofto been thetest of transcription alternative mainly14 proteins established approach involv and translationed byes in 16S bytranscription rRNAusing machineries: largesequence andsequence 53comparison.tackling ribosomal datasets. the Methanopyrus Withproteins We theanalyzed accumulation(3,275 archaealkandleri and 6,377 of phyparadox comp positions,logenyletely Abstract deposited research Background: Phylogenetic analysis of the Archaea has been mainly established by 16S rRNA sequence comparison. With the accumulation of completely sequenced genomes, it is now possible to test alternative approaches by using large sequence datasets.
    [Show full text]
  • WARREN LYNWOOD GARDNER Expression Vectors for the Methane-Producing Archaeon Methanococcus Maripaludis (Under the Direction of WILLIAM B
    WARREN LYNWOOD GARDNER Expression vectors for the methane-producing archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis (Under the Direction of WILLIAM B. WHITMAN) Methanogens are strict anaerobes that use one and two carbon compounds for methanogenesis. They contain many unusual cofactors and enzymes, and many of their proteins are oxygen-sensitive and are present at low concentrations within the cells. An expression system that overexpresses homologous and heterologous proteins would facilitate research on the unique oxygen-sensitive enzymes in these organisms. However, traditional expression systems may lack the cofactors and maturation enzymes necessary for the expression of the active holoenzymes. Therefore, a major goal of this work was to develop expression vectors. To develop a shuttle vector, a series of integrative vectors were first constructed. The integrative vectors were based on the pUC-derivative pMEB.2. pMEB.2 provided the puromycin resistance marker for methanococci, an Escherichia coli origin of replication, and an ampicillin resistance marker for E. coli. A multiple cloning site and the Methanococcus voltae histone promoter (PhmvA) were added to form the integrative, expression vector pWLG14. To demonstrate the utility of PhmvA, pWLG14 was used to overexpress the genomic copy of the Methanococcus maripaludis acetohydroxyacid synthase. To form an expression shuttle vector suitable for heterologous genes, pWLG14 and the cryptic plasmid pURB500 from M. maripaludis strain were ligated together to form pWLG30. pWLG30 was the first expression shuttle vector for the methanogens. To demonstrate the utility of pWLG30, the E. coli b-galactosidase gene was cloned into pWLG30 to yield pWLG30+lacZ. Upon transformation into M. maripaludis, the recombinant strain expressed b-galactosidase to the level of 1% of the cellular protein.
    [Show full text]
  • Extremophiles
    Extremophiles These microbes thrive under conditions that would kill other creatures. The molecules that enable extremophiles to prosper are becoming useful to industry by Michael T. Madigan and Barry L. Marrs DEEP-SEA VENT HEAT-LOVING MICROBES (THERMOPHILES AND HYPERTHERMOPHILES) SEA ICE COLD-LOVING MICROBES (PSYCHROPHILES) Methanopyrus kandleri Polaromonas vacuolata thereby increasing efficiency and reduc- magine diving into a refreshingly ing costs. They can also form the basis of cool swimming pool. Now, think entirely new enzyme-based processes. I instead of plowing into water that tially serve in an array of applications. Perhaps 20 research groups in the U.S., is boiling or near freezing. Or consider Of particular interest are the enzymes Japan, Germany and elsewhere are now jumping into vinegar, household am- (biological catalysts) that help extremo- actively searching for extremophiles and monia or concentrated brine. The leap philes to function in brutal circumstanc- their enzymes. Although only a few ex- would be disastrous for a person. Yet es. Like synthetic catalysts, enzymes, tremozymes have made their way into many microorganisms make their home which are proteins, speed up chemical use thus far, others are sure to follow. As in such forbidding environments. These reactions without being altered them- is true of standard enzymes, transform- microbes are called extremophiles be- selves. Last year the biomedical field and ing a newly isolated extremozyme into cause they thrive under conditions that, other industries worldwide spent more a viable product for industry can take from the human vantage, are clearly ex- than $2.5 billion on enzymes for appli- several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Processes in Oil Fields: Culprits, Problems, and Opportunities
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the book Advances in Applied Microbiology, Vol 66, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who know you, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From: Noha Youssef, Mostafa S. Elshahed, and Michael J. McInerney, Microbial Processes in Oil Fields: Culprits, Problems, and Opportunities. In Allen I. Laskin, Sima Sariaslani, and Geoffrey M. Gadd, editors: Advances in Applied Microbiology, Vol 66, Burlington: Academic Press, 2009, pp. 141-251. ISBN: 978-0-12-374788-4 © Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. Academic Press. Author's personal copy CHAPTER 6 Microbial Processes in Oil Fields: Culprits, Problems, and Opportunities Noha Youssef, Mostafa S. Elshahed, and Michael J. McInerney1 Contents I. Introduction 142 II. Factors Governing Oil Recovery 144 III. Microbial Ecology of Oil Reservoirs 147 A. Origins of microorganisms recovered from oil reservoirs 147 B. Microorganisms isolated from oil reservoirs 148 C. Culture-independent analysis of microbial communities in oil reservoirs 155 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • (Gid ) Genes Coding for Putative Trna:M5u-54 Methyltransferases in 355 Bacterial and Archaeal Complete Genomes
    Table S1. Taxonomic distribution of the trmA and trmFO (gid ) genes coding for putative tRNA:m5U-54 methyltransferases in 355 bacterial and archaeal complete genomes. Asterisks indicate the presence and the number of putative genes found. Genomes Taxonomic position TrmA Gid Archaea Crenarchaea Aeropyrum pernix_K1 Crenarchaeota; Thermoprotei; Desulfurococcales; Desulfurococcaceae Cenarchaeum symbiosum Crenarchaeota; Thermoprotei; Cenarchaeales; Cenarchaeaceae Pyrobaculum aerophilum_str_IM2 Crenarchaeota; Thermoprotei; Thermoproteales; Thermoproteaceae Sulfolobus acidocaldarius_DSM_639 Crenarchaeota; Thermoprotei; Sulfolobales; Sulfolobaceae Sulfolobus solfataricus Crenarchaeota; Thermoprotei; Sulfolobales; Sulfolobaceae Sulfolobus tokodaii Crenarchaeota; Thermoprotei; Sulfolobales; Sulfolobaceae Euryarchaea Archaeoglobus fulgidus Euryarchaeota; Archaeoglobi; Archaeoglobales; Archaeoglobaceae Haloarcula marismortui_ATCC_43049 Euryarchaeota; Halobacteria; Halobacteriales; Halobacteriaceae; Haloarcula Halobacterium sp Euryarchaeota; Halobacteria; Halobacteriales; Halobacteriaceae; Haloarcula Haloquadratum walsbyi Euryarchaeota; Halobacteria; Halobacteriales; Halobacteriaceae; Haloquadra Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum Euryarchaeota; Methanobacteria; Methanobacteriales; Methanobacteriaceae Methanococcoides burtonii_DSM_6242 Euryarchaeota; Methanomicrobia; Methanosarcinales; Methanosarcinaceae Methanococcus jannaschii Euryarchaeota; Methanococci; Methanococcales; Methanococcaceae Methanococcus maripaludis_S2 Euryarchaeota; Methanococci;
    [Show full text]
  • Extremophiles — Link Between Earth and Astrobiology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Directory of Open Access Journals Zbornik Matice srpske za prirodne nauke / Proc. Nat. Sci, Matica Srpska Novi Sad, ¥ 114, 5—16, 2008 UDC 133.52:57 Dejan B. Stojanoviã1 , Oliver O. Fojkar2 , Aleksandra V. Drobac-Åik1 , Kristina O. Åajko3 , Tamara I. Duliã1 ,ZoricaB.Sviråev1 1 Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology and Ecology, Trg Dositeja Obradoviãa 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia 2 Institute for nature conservation of Serbia, Radniåka 20A, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia 3 Faculty of Sciences, Department of Physics, Trg Dositeja Obradoviãa 4, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia EXTREMOPHILES — LINK BETWEEN EARTH AND ASTROBIOLOGY ABSTRACT: Astrobiology studies the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life in the universe. The most promising worlds in Solar system, beyond Earth, which may har- bor life are Mars and Jovian moon Europa. Extremophiles are organisms that thrive on the edge of temperature, hypersalinity, pH extremes, pressure, dryness and so on. In this paper, some extremophile cyanobacteria have been discussed as possible life forms in a scale of astrobiology. Samples were taken from solenetz and solonchak types of soil from the Voj- vodina region. The main idea in this paper lies in the fact that high percentage of salt found in solonchak and solonetz gives the possibility of comparison these types of soil with “soil" on Mars, which is also rich in salt. KEYWORDS: Astrobiology, extremophiles, cyanobacteria, halophiles 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. About astrobiology Astrobiology studies the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life in the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Extreme Environments
    insight review articles Life in extreme environments Lynn J. Rothschild & Rocco L. Mancinelli NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000, USA (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]) Each recent report of liquid water existing elsewhere in the Solar System has reverberated through the international press and excited the imagination of humankind. Why? Because in the past few decades we have come to realize that where there is liquid water on Earth, virtually no matter what the physical conditions, there is life. What we previously thought of as insurmountable physical and chemical barriers to life, we now see as yet another niche harbouring ‘extremophiles’. This realization, coupled with new data on the survival of microbes in the space environment and modelling of the potential for transfer of life between celestial bodies, suggests that life could be more common than previously thought. Here we examine critically what it means to be an extremophile, and the implications of this for evolution, biotechnology and especially the search for life in the Universe. ormal is passé; extreme is chic. While thriving in biological extremes (for example, nutritional Aristotle cautioned “everything in extremes, and extremes of population density, parasites, moderation”, the Romans, known for their prey, and so on). excesses, coined the word ‘extremus’, the ‘Extremophile’ conjures up images of prokaryotes, yet the superlative of exter (‘being on the outside’). taxonomic range spans all three domains. Although all NBy the fifteenth century ‘extreme’ had arrived, via Middle hyperthermophiles are members of the Archaea and French, to English. At the dawning of the twenty-first Bacteria, eukaryotes are common among the psychrophiles, century we know that the Solar System, and even Earth, acidophiles, alkaliphiles, piezophiles, xerophiles and contain environmental extremes unimaginable to the halophiles (which respectively thrive at low temperatures, low ‘ancients’ of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]