DOCSLIB.ORG

NO PROTEIN FOLDING NO LIFE (Fundamental Principles in Cell Are Set by Protein Folding)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NO PROTEIN FOLDING NO LIFE (Fundamental Principles in Cell Are Set by Protein Folding) ISSN: 2456-7264 6th Issue: 28April, 2018 NO PROTEIN FOLDING NO LIFE (Fundamental principles in cell are set by protein folding) Suvendra Kumar Ray Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tezpur University, Tezpur–784028, Assam, India, email: [email protected]. +913712275406 Prologue mechanism of folding of nrPs inside the cell. I had an opportunity to listen to a Do nrPs fold like ribosomal proteins (rPs)? I talk delivered by the Padma Bhusan P. realized that there is no clear understanding Balram, IISc Bangalore, India on one of the by the scientists regarding the folding of foundation day lectures of Institute of nrPs. Why do cells have nrPs? More I Advanced Studies in Science and started thinking about the folding of nrPs, Technology (IASST), Guwahati, India. The several exciting ideas occurred to me. I talk had covered proteinaceous toxins (prTs) shared the ideas with my students and produced by animals. Interestingly many colleagues. Ultimately I got an impression prTs are synthesized by enzymes directly that protein folding is the main fundamental using amino acids as substrates without problem in cell which governs several translation (tRNA, ribosome and mRNA). fundamental principles in cell. So these peptides or proteins belong to the The role of the central dogma and non-ribosomal proteins (nrPs) category. ribosome in protein folding Though previously I was aware of some If proteins can be synthesized nrPs, it is after hearing the above without using ribosome and mRNA as in deliberation that I got more curious about case of nrPs, then why not all proteins inside nrPs. During the question answer sessions, I the cell got synthesized as nrPs during had the opportunity to ask a question on the evolution, which would have obviously avoided the requirement of DNA and RNA then the enzyme E3 will add A4 to A1A2A3 in life, and proteins would have also been to make A1A2A3A4, then enzyme E4 will the genetic material. So where was the add A5 to A1A2A3A4 to make difficulty? I started analyzing enzyme A1A2A3A4A5, and finally the enzyme E5 mediated synthesis of nrPs in cell. A will add A6 to A1A2A3A4A5 to schematic representation of a hypothetical A1A2A3A4A5A6. It is simple for E1 to synthesis of a hexapeptide as nrPs is recognize A1 and A2 to synthesize A1A2. described in Fig. 1. This helped us to E2 will bind to E1E2 and will join with E3. understand the problem associated with the E1E2 will attain different conformations. To nrPs synthesis. It is obvious to realize that which conformation it will bind. The the folding of these proteins is indeed a enzyme will recognize the amino acid problem. sequence or the structure of the peptide. How the enzyme E5 will recognize the pentapeptide A1A2A3A4A5? If it recognizes the peptide by recognizing each amino acid, then the entire peptide is to remain in unfolded state, if it recognizes the structure, then it should have a structure which other peptides should not attain. As Fig 1. A schematic presentation of the peptide size increases, it is difficult for enzymatic synthesis of a hexapeptide (nrPs) an enzyme to either recognize the longer Enzymatic synthesis of a hexapeptide is sequence of amino acids or to recognize the schematically shown. E1 to E6 are enzymes conformation of the peptide to add the presented as semi-circles. A1 to A6 are incoming amino acids. If it recognizes amino acids. conformation, then it will not be specific for the peptide because different peptides might Let’s consider an example of the synthesis have the same conformation. If it recognizes of a hexa-peptide peptide the primary sequence, then the (A1A2A3A4A5A6) without involving RNA protein/peptide has to remain in fully template. In the first step, enzyme E1 will unfolded state till it gets completely add A1 and A2 to make A1A2, then enzyme synthesized. Once a protein remains E2 will add A3 to A1A2 to make A1A2A3, completely unfolded till it gets completely synthesized, then how to know that the of ribosome and the ribosomal RNA in synthesis of the protein has reached its final protein folding (Bera et al., 1994; Gupta, step? Either termination amino acid is 1999; Das et al., 1996; Chattopadhyay et al., required in protein synthesis or the protein is 1996). I shall regard Prof. Dasgupta’s to be circular in nature. Considering these contributions to this field as equivalent to points, it seems that folding of a protein, the contribution of E. Chargaff’s whose synthesis is not guided by a template, biochemistry research towards the DNA is not simple. The few nrPs are assumed to double helix discovery. It is now beyond fold spontaneously and these can be doubt that protein folding is a co- considered as exceptions to the rule. translational process (Jacobs and Shakhnovich, 2017) and the nascent Is protein folding so fundamental in polypeptides fold in the exit channel of cellular life that it resulted in the evolution ribosome (Sohmen et al., 2015; Ito, 2016). of template dependent life in cell, i.e. DNARNAProtein, the central dogma in Ribosome size is one of the main molecular biology? Ribosome, the site of differences between prokaryotes and protein synthesis, is the most complex eukaryotes: prokaryotes have 70S ribosomes structure present inside a cell. If peptide while eukaryotes have 80S ribosomes. This bonds can be formed in nrPs without structural difference has been exploited to ribosome, then why did the evolution of use antibiotics to get rid of bacterial such a complex structure like ribosome infections in humans. Why ribosome occur? Is the main function of ribosome structure is so different between the two inside the cell to fold proteins during their types of cell? It indicates that ribosome has synthesis? It is exciting that many research to execute some different functions between articles published in leading journals have these cells. We know that ribosome in recently described the role of ribosome in eukaryotes remain bound to the membrane protein folding (Das et al, 2008; Nilsson et of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to carry out al., 2015; Holtkamp et al., 2015; Javed et co-translational translocation of proteins al., 2017). While searching literature, it was across the ER membrane. Formation of very exciting to find that almost two decades disulfide bond in proteins in eukaryotes ago, Prof. Chanchal Dasgupta from Kolkata occurs inside the ER lumen. Proteins that are University, India carried out several to be secreted out to the exterior, Golgi pioneering experiments to describe the role complex, and the cell membrane - all pass through the ER. The co-translational synonymous changes in coding sequences translocation of proteins is not found in (Kudla et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2013; Zhou et prokaryotes. The co-translational al., 2013). Now it is realized that the translocation of proteins through ER is a sequence of codons in mRNA not only fundamental requirement for different contains the information about amino acid protein modifications and folding of sequence for a protein, it also contains membrane and secreted proteins. This may information for protein structure (Ray et al., be a fundamental cause for the spatial and 2014; Mitra et al., 2016). temporal separation of transcription and Protein synthesis by ribosome is translation events in eukaryotes and the fundamentally different from the synthesis reason for evolution of nucleus. I believe ER of DNA and RNA in cell: unlike the to be the first membrane bound organelle synthesis of DNA and RNA where the evolved before the eukaryotic cell became nucleotides diffuse directly to the enzyme the way it is and so the evolution of 80S active site, amino acids are brought to the ribosome in eukaryotes. ribosome active site by tRNA for protein Co-translational protein folding and synthesis. Amino acid incorporation for codon degeneracy in amino acids protein synthesis involves several steps as Anfinsen suggested that the three follows: (i). amino acid tagged tRNAs dimensional structure of a protein is (charged tRNAs) are brought by the dependent upon its primary structure, i.e. elongation factors to the ribosome; (ii). the amino acid sequence (Anfinsen, 1972; correct codon-anticodon pairing is detected 1973). This theory got conclusively by the smaller subunit of the ribosome challenged recently in 2007, when it was (30S/40S) which triggers a movement of the demonstrated that a protein with unchanged tRNA acceptor stem bringing the amino acid amino acid sequence attained a different to the proximity of the peptidyl tRNA in the conformation due to a synonymous change bigger ribosomal subunit, and (iii). the in the nucleotide sequence in the coding peptidyl transferase activity in the larger region (Kimchi-Sarfaty et al., 2007). After subunit (50S/60S) catalyzes the formation of this seminal discovery, many more a peptide bond with the incoming amino evidences were demonstrated suggesting the acid and simultaneously the transfer of the importance of co-translational protein peptide from one tRNA to the other tRNA folding and protein structure by doing occurs (Ogle et al., 2003). Therefore, translation is the most complex phenomenon protein folding and structure is an important inside the cell. This complex pathway has factor for the assignment of degeneracy to evolved to make the protein synthesis a amino acids. A hypothetical description on slower (Choi and Puglisi, 2017) and the significance of amino acids in protein accurate process than DNA and RNA structure and codon degeneracy for the synthesis, which may be also to assist amino acid is given in Fig. 2. folding proteins correctly during their synthesis (Pechmann et al., 2013). In the genetic code table, 18 out of the 20 amino acids are encoded by more than one codon, known as codon degeneracy (Satapathy et al., 2016).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dissertation
    Dissertation submitted to the Combined Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics of the Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg, Germany for the degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences Presented by M.Sc. Matilde Bertolini born in Parma, Italy Oral examination: 02/03/2021 Profiling interactions of proximal nascent chains reveals a general co-translational mechanism of protein complex assembly Referees: Prof. Dr. Bernd Bukau Prof. Dr. Caludio Joazeiro Preface Contributions The experiments and analyses presented in this Thesis were conducted by myself unless otherwise indicated, under the supervision of Dr. Günter Kramer and Prof. Dr. Bernd Bukau. The Disome Selective Profiling (DiSP) technology was developed in collaboration with my colleague Kai Fenzl, with whom I also generated initial datasets of human HEK293-T and U2OS cells. Dr. Ilia Kats developed important bioinformatics tools for the analysis of DiSP data, including RiboSeqTools and the sigmoid fitting algorithm. He also offered great input on statistical analyses. Dr. Frank Tippmann performed analysis of crystal structures. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ......................................................................................................V List of Tables ...................................................................................................... VII List of Equations .............................................................................................. VIII Abbreviations ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny Recapitulates Learning: Self-Optimization of Genetic Code
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/260877; this version posted February 6, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Phylogeny Recapitulates Learning: Self-Optimization of Genetic Code Oliver Attie1, Brian Sulkow1, Chong Di1, and Wei-Gang Qiu1,2,3,* 1Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College & 2Graduate Center, City University of New York; 3Department of Physiology and Biophysics & Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA Emails: Oliver Attie [email protected]; Brian Sulkow [email protected]; Chong Di [email protected]; *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Learning algorithms have been proposed as a non-selective mechanism capable of creating complex adaptive systems in life. Evolutionary learning however has not been demonstrated to be a plausible cause for the origin of a specific molecular system. Here we show that genetic codes as optimal as the Standard Genetic Code (SGC) emerge readily by following a molecular analog of the Hebb’s rule (“neurons fire together, wire together”). Specifically, error-minimizing genetic codes are obtained by maximizing the number of physio-chemically similar amino acids assigned to evolutionarily similar codons. Formulating genetic code as a Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) with amino acids as “cities” and codons as “tour positions” and implemented with a Hopfield neural network, the unsupervised learning algorithm efficiently finds an abundance of genetic codes that are more error- minimizing than SGC.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Correlated TRAN Abundances on Translation Errors and Evolution of Codon Usage Bias
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Faculty Publications and Other Works -- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 9-2010 Effect of Correlated TRAN Abundances on Translation Errors and Evolution of Codon Usage Bias Premal Shah University of Tennessee - Knoxville Michael A. Gilchrist Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_ecolpubs Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Shah, Premal and Gilchrist, Michael A., "Effect of Correlated TRAN Abundances on Translation Errors and Evolution of Codon Usage Bias" (2010). Faculty Publications and Other Works -- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_ecolpubs/37 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Other Works -- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Effect of Correlated tRNA Abundances on Translation Errors and Evolution of Codon Usage Bias Premal Shah1,2*, Michael A. Gilchrist1,2 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America, 2 National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America Abstract Despite the fact that tRNA abundances are thought to play a major role in determining translation error rates, their distribution across the genetic code and the resulting implications have received little attention. In general, studies of codon usage bias (CUB) assume that codons with higher tRNA abundance have lower missense error rates.
    [Show full text]
  • The RNA Code and Protein Synthesis
    Downloaded from symposium.cshlp.org on January 18, 2014 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The RNA Code and Protein Synthesis M. Nirenberg, T. Caskey, R. Marshall, et al. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1966 31: 11-24 Access the most recent version at doi:10.1101/SQB.1966.031.01.008 References This article cites 37 articles, 24 of which can be accessed free at: http://symposium.cshlp.org/content/31/11.refs.html Article cited in: http://symposium.cshlp.org/content/31/11#related-urls Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in service the box at the top right corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology go to: http://symposium.cshlp.org/subscriptions Copyright © 1966 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Downloaded from symposium.cshlp.org on January 18, 2014 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The RNA Code and Protein Synthesis M. NIRENBERG, T. CASKEY, R. MARSHALL, R. BRIMACOMBE, D. KELLOGG, B. DOCTOIr D. HATFIELD, J. LEVIN, F. ROTTMAN, S. PESTKA, M. WILCOX, AND F. ANDERSON Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics, National Heart Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland and t Division of Biochemistry, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C. Many properties of the RNA code which were TABLE 1. CHARACTERISTICS OF AA-sRI~A BINDING TO RIBOSOMES discussed at the 1963 Cold Spring Harbor meeting were based on information obtained with randomly C14-Phe-sRNA bound to ribo- ordered synthetic polynucleotides.
    [Show full text]
  • A Numerical Representation and Classification of Codons To
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.02.971036; this version posted March 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. A Numerical Representation and Classication of Codons to Investigate Codon Alternation Patterns during Genetic Mutations on Disease Pathogenesis Antara Senguptaa, Pabitra Pal Choudhuryd, Subhadip Chakrabortyb,e, Swarup Royc,∗∗, Jayanta Kumar Dasd,∗, Ditipriya Mallicke, Siddhartha S Janae aDepartment of Master of Computer Applications, MCKV Institute of Engineering, Liluah, India bDepartment of Botany, Nabadwip Vidyasagar College, Nabadwip, India cDepartment of Computer Applications,Sikkim University, Gangtok, Sikkim, India dApplied Statistical Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India eSchool of Biological Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata, India 1. Introduction Genes are the functional units of heredity [4]. It is mainly responsible for the structural and functional changes and for the variation in organisms which could be good or bad. DNA (Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid) sequences build the genes of organisms which in turn encode for particular protein us- ing codon. Any uctuation in this sequence (codons), for example, mishaps during DNA transcription, might lead to a change in the genetic code which alter the protein synthesis. This change is called mutation. Mutation diers from Single Nucleotide Polymorphism(SNP) in many ways [23]. For instance, occurrence of mutation in a population should be less than 1% whereas SNP occurs with greater than 1%. Mutation always occurs in diseased group whereas SNP is occurs in both diseased and control population. Mutation is responsible for some disease phenotype but SNP may or may not be as- sociated with disease phenotype.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Code Degeneracy Is Established by the Decoding Center
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.16.444340; this version posted May 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Genetic code degeneracy is established by the decoding center of the ribosome 2 3 Shixin Ye and Jean Lehmann* 4 5 INSERM U1195 unit, University of Paris-Saclay, 94276, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France 6 Institute for InteGrative BioloGy of tHe Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, University of Paris-Saclay, 7 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 8 9 *Corresponding author 10 Emails: [email protected]; [email protected] 11 12 SUMMARY 13 The degeneracy of the genetic code confers a wide array of properties to coding sequences. Yet, 14 its origin is still unclear. A structural analysis has shown that the stability of the Watson-Crick 15 base pair at the second position of the anticodon-codon interaction is a critical parameter 16 controlling the extent of non-specific pairings accepted at the third position by the ribosome, a 17 flexibility at the root of degeneracy. Based on recent cryo-EM analyses, the present work shows 18 that residue A1493 of the decoding center provides a significant contribution to the stability of 19 this base pair, revealing that the ribosome is directly involved in the establishment of 20 degeneracy. Building on existing evolutionary models, we show the evidence that the early 21 appearance of A1493 and A1492 established the basis of degeneracy when an elementary 22 kinetic scheme of translation was prevailing.
    [Show full text]
  • New Horizon College of Engineering Departmrnt of Biotechnology
    NEW HORIZON COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMRNT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY UNIT 4: TRANSLATION Introduction to Genetic code: Elucidation of genetic code, Codon degeneracy, Wobble hypothesis and its importance, Prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes. Components of translation. Activation of tRNA. Mechanism of translation: Initiation, Elongation and Termination of protein synthesis, Differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein synthesis. Post-translational modifications and its importance. Protein splicing. Protein targeting: signal hypothesis and cotranslational processing, transportation. Inhibitors of protein synthesis. The Genetic Code Elucidating the Genetic Code • A triplet code is required: 43 = 64, but 42 = 16 - not enough for 20 amino acids • But is the code overlapping? • And is the code punctuated? The Nature of the Genetic Code • A group of three bases codes for one amino acid • The code is not overlapping • The base sequence is read from a fixed starting point, with no punctuation • The code is degenerate (in most cases, each amino acid can be designated by any of several triplets Assignment of "codons" to their respective amino acids was achieved by in vitro biochemistry • Marshall Nirenberg and Heinrich Matthaei showed that poly-U produced polyphenylalanine in a cell-free solution from E. coli • Poly-A gave polylysine • Poly-C gave polyproline • Poly-G gave polyglycine • But what of others? Features of the Genetic Code • All the codons have meaning: 61 specify amino acids, and the other 3 are "nonsense" or "stop" codons • The code is unambiguous - only one amino acid is indicated by each of the 61 codons • The code is degenerate - except for Trp and Met, each amino acid is coded by two or more codons • Codons representing the same or similar amino acids are similar in sequence • 2nd base pyrimidine: usually nonpolar amino acid ,2nd base purine: usually polar or charged aa .
    [Show full text]
  • Bt6504 – Molecular Biology Question Bank
    JEPPIAAR ENGINEERING COLLEGE B.TECH – BIOTECHNOLOGY (R- 2013) BT6504 – MOLECULAR BIOLOGY III YEAR & V SEM BATCH: 2016-2020 QUESTION BANK PREPARED BY Mr. G. GOMATHI SANKAR G. Gomathi Sankar S.N TOPIC REFER PAGE O ENCE NO UNIT I – CHEMISTRY OF NUCLEIC ACIDS 1 Introduction to nucleic acids TB1 79 2 Nucleic acids as genetic material TB1 79 3 Structure and physicochemical properties of elements in DNA and RNA TB1 80-82 4 Biological significance of differences in DNA and RNA TB1 84-92 5 Primary structure of DNA: Chemical and structural qualities of 3’,5’- TB1 94-96 Phosphodiester bond 6 Secondary Structure of DNA: Watson & Crick model TB1 97-100 7 Chargaff’s rule TB1 109 8 X–ray diffraction analysis of DNA, Forces stabilizes DNA structure TB1 110-112 9 Conformational variants of double helical DNA, Hogsteen base pairing TB1 114 10 Triple helix, Quadruple helix, Reversible denaturation and hyperchromic effect TB1 112-114 11 Tertiary structure of DNA: DNA supercoiling. TB1 148 UNIT II – DNA REPLICATION & REPAIR 1 Overview of Central dogma TB1 208 2 Organization of prokaryotic and eukaryotic chromosomes DNA replication: TB1 209 Meselson & Stahl experiment, bi–directional DNA replication 3 Okazaki fragments TB1 210 4 Proteomics of DNA replication, Fidelity of DNA replication TB1 224-231 5 Inhibitors of DNA replication TB1 232-235 6 Overview of differences in prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA replication TB1 271-273 7 Telomere replication in eukaryotes TB1 239-246 8 D-loop and rolling circle mode of replication TB1 255-258 9 Mutagens, DNA mutations
    [Show full text]
  • The Graph, Geometry and Symmetries of the Genetic Code with Hamming Metric
    Symmetry 2015, 7, 1211-1260; doi:10.3390/sym7031211 OPEN ACCESS symmetry ISSN 2073-8994 www.mdpi.com/journal/symmetry Article The Graph, Geometry and Symmetries of the Genetic Code with Hamming Metric Reijer Lenstra Route Cantonale 103, Saint Sulpice VD 1025, Switzerland; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +41-798-535-889 Academic Editor: David Becker Received: 28 April 2015 / Accepted: 7 July 2015 / Published: 14 July 2015 Abstract: The similarity patterns of the genetic code result from similar codons encoding similar messages. We develop a new mathematical model to analyze these patterns. The physicochemical characteristics of amino acids objectively quantify their differences and similarities; the Hamming metric does the same for the 64 codons of the codon set. (Hamming distances equal the number of different codon positions: AAA and AAC are at 1-distance; codons are maximally at 3-distance.) The CodonPolytope, a 9-dimensional geometric object, is spanned by 64 vertices that represent the codons and the Euclidian distances between these vertices correspond one-to-one with intercodon Hamming distances. The CodonGraph represents the vertices and edges of the polytope; each edge equals a Hamming 1-distance. The mirror reflection symmetry group of the polytope is isomorphic to the largest permutation symmetry group of the codon set that preserves Hamming distances. These groups contain 82,944 symmetries. Many polytope symmetries coincide with the degeneracy and similarity patterns of the genetic code. These code symmetries are strongly related with the face structure of the polytope with smaller faces displaying stronger code symmetries. Splitting the polytope stepwise into smaller faces models an early evolution of the code that generates this hierarchy of code symmetries.
    [Show full text]
  • Dependency of Codon Usage on Protein Sequence Patterns: a Statistical Study
    Foroughmand-Araabi et al. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 2014, 11:2 http://www.tbiomed.com/content/11/1/2 RESEARCH Open Access Dependency of codon usage on protein sequence patterns: a statistical study Mohammad-Hadi Foroughmand-Araabi1,BahramGoliaei1*, Kasra Alishahi2 and Mehdi Sadeghi3 *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract 1 Institute of Biochemistry and Background: Codon degeneracy and codon usage by organisms is an interesting and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran challenging problem. Researchers demonstrated the relation between codon usage Full list of author information is and various functions or properties of genes and proteins, such as gene regulation, available at the end of the article translation rate, translation efficiency, mRNA stability, splicing, and protein domains. Researchers usually represent segments of proteins responsible for specific functions or structures in a family of proteins as sequence patterns or motifs. We asked the question if organisms use the same codons in pattern segments as compared to the rest of the sequence. Methods: We used the likelihood ratio test, Pearson’s chi-squared test, and mutual information to compare these two codon usages. Results: We showed that codon usage, in segments of genes that code for a given pattern or motif in a group of proteins, varied from the rest of the gene. The codon usage in these segments was not random. Amino acids with larger number of codons used more specific codon ratios in these segments. We studied the number of amino acids in the pattern (pattern length). As patterns got longer, there was a slight decrease in the fraction of patterns with significant different codon usage in the pattern region as compared to codon usage in the gene region.
    [Show full text]
  • Synonymous Codons Influencing Gene Expression in Organisms
    Journal name: Research and Reports in Biochemistry Article Designation: REVIEW Year: 2016 Volume: 6 Research and Reports in Biochemistry Dovepress Running head verso: Mitra et al Running head recto: Synonymous codons influencing gene expression open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRBC.S83483 Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Synonymous codons influencing gene expression in organisms Sutanuka Mitra1 Abstract: Nowadays, it is beyond doubt that synonymous codons are not the same with respect Suvendra Kumar Ray2 to expression of a gene. In favor of this, ribosome profiling experiments in vivo and in vitro Rajat Banerjee1 have suggested that ribosome occupancy time is not the same for different synonymous codons. Therefore, synonymous codons influence differently the speed of translation elongation, which 1Department of Biotechnology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West guides further cotranslational folding kinetics of a protein. It is now realized that the position Bengal, 2Department of Molecular of each codon in a coding sequence is important. The effect of synonymous codons on protein Biology and Biotechnology, Tezpur structure is an exciting field of research nowadays. This review discusses the recent develop- University, Napaam, Tezpur, Assam, India ments in this field. Keywords: codon usage bias, synonymous codons, ribosome profiling, cotranslational protein For personal use only. folding, protein structure Introduction In the standard genetic code table, of the 64 triplets or codons, 61 codons correspond to the 20 amino acids. While Met and Trp are encoded by one codon each, the other 18 amino acids are encoded by two to six different codons. This is called codon degeneracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Plant Mitochondrial Genes Is Associated with Intron Number and Mirrors Species Evolution
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Plant Mitochondrial Genes Is Associated with Intron Number and Mirrors Species Evolution Wenjing Xu☯, Tian Xing☯, Mingming Zhao, Xunhao Yin, Guangmin Xia, Mengcheng Wang* The Key Laboratory of Plant Cell Engineering and Germplasm Innovation, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science, Shandong University, 27 Shandanan Road, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Abstract Synonymous codon usage bias (SCUB) is a common event that a non-uniform usage of codons often occurs in nearly all organisms. We previously found that SCUB is correlated with both intron number and exon position in the plant nuclear genome but not in the plastid genome; SCUB in both nuclear and plastid genome can mirror the evolutionary specializa- OPEN ACCESS tion. However, how about the rules in the mitochondrial genome has not been addressed. Citation: Xu W, Xing T, Zhao M, Yin X, Xia G, Wang Here, we present an analysis of SCUB in the mitochondrial genome, based on 24 plant spe- M (2015) Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Plant cies ranging from algae to land plants. The frequencies of NNA and NNT (A- and T-ending Mitochondrial Genes Is Associated with Intron codons) are higher than those of NNG and NNC, with the strongest preference in bryo- Number and Mirrors Species Evolution. PLoS ONE phytes and the weakest in land plants, suggesting an association between SCUB and plant 10(6): e0131508. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131508 evolution. The preference for NNA and NNT is more evident in genes harboring a greater Editor: Genlou Sun, Saint Mary's University, number of introns in land plants, but the bias to NNA and NNT exhibits even among exons.
    [Show full text]