DOCSLIB.ORG

CHINA MANUFACTURING 2025 Putting Industrial Policy Ahead of Market Forces © 2017 by the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, All Rights Reserved

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CHINA MANUFACTURING 2025 Putting Industrial Policy Ahead of Market Forces © 2017 by the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, All Rights Reserved www.europeanchamber.com.cn www.europeanchamber.com.cn CHINA MANUFACTURING 2025 Putting Industrial Policy Ahead of Market Forces © 2017 by the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, all rights reserved. This study may not be reproduced either in part or in full without prior written consent of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China. Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 1 2. Why China wants to change∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 2 2.1 China has been the world’s factory, and now it wants more∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 2 2.2 Climbing out of the ‘smile curve’ trough and escaping the middle income trap∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 3 2.3 China’s race to get rich before it gets old∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙4 2.4 Feeling squeezed from both sides: competition from developed and developing countries∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 4 2.5 A latecomer to manufacturing automation∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 5 3. CM2025 vs Industry 4.0∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 6 3.1 Fundamental differences to the EU’s approach remain∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 6 4. The CM2025 initiative∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 7 4.1 So what is CM2025?∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 7 4.2 Market share targets and ‘indigenous innovation’∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 11 4.3 Planning the Chinese economy’s future∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 12 4.4 Macro-level planning: the new thinking∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 13 4.5 Who’s in charge, masters or markets?∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 13 4.6 Old wine in new bottles? Yes and no∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 14 4.7 Industry-level planning: the old wine∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 15 5. Policy tools used in support of CM2025∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 15 5.1 Forced technology transfers in exchange for market access∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 16 5.2 Market access and government procurement restrictions for foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs)∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 16 5.3 Standards∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙16 5.4 Subsidies∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙16 5.5 Financial policy∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙17 5.6 Government-backed investment funds∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 17 5.7 Support from local government∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 18 5.8 Technology-seeking investments abroad∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 18 5.9 SOEs: mergers and politicisation∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 19 5.10 Public-private partnerships (PPPs)∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 20 6. Inbound and outbound investment∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 20 6.1 Highly unbalanced bilateral investment relations in 2016∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 20 6.2 New restrictions on outbound foreign direct investment of limited importance to CM2025∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 21 7. Impact of CM2025 on European business∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 22 7.1 Outlook by industry∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 22 7.1.1 Next generation IT∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 23 7.1.1.1 Cloud computing∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 24 7.1.1.2 Telecommunications equipment∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 26 7.1.1.3 Semiconductors∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 28 7.1.2 Robotics∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 34 7.1.3 NEVs∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 39 7.1.4 Advanced rail equipment∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 43 7.1.5 Biopharmaceuticals and medical devices∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 45 7.1.5.1 Biopharmaceuticals∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 45 7.1.5.2 Medical Devices∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 47 8. The broader implications of CM2025∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 49 8.1 China’s labour market∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 49 8.2 Increased overcapacity∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 51 8.3 Potential global pushback∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 51 9. Recommendations∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 52 9.1 For the Chinese Government∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 52 9.1.1. Move forward with domestic, market-based reforms∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 52 9.1.2 Support free trade and allow market share to be determined by competition, not government targets∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 53 9.1.3 Contribute to the establishment of new international investment guidelines ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 54 9.2 For European Union authorities and Member State governments∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 54 9.2.1 Upgrade thoughtful and transparent investment review mechanisms∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 54 9.2.2 Contribute to the establishment of new international investment guidelines ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 56 9.3 For European business∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 56 9.3.1 Align long-term plans with China’s industrial upgrade∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 56 9.3.2 Keep innovating to stay ahead∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 56 9.3.3 Monitor international M&As to identify emerging competition∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 57 9.3.4 Do not rely on one market or client∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 57 Appendix∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 58 Abbreviations∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ 63 China Manufacturing 2025 1. Executive summary In May 2015, Chinese state planners launched another initiative to promote and support the development of advanced industries and technologies. It is clear that this latest attempt is not to be achieved through measures that will∙establish∙a∙market∙economy.∙Instead,∙government∙officials∙have∙tasked∙themselves∙with∙steering∙development∙ and have handpicked the industries that they believe will drive China’s economy in the future. Titled China Manufacturing 2025 (CM2025), the plan sets ambitious goals for developing ten industries.1 The numbers attached to this initiative are staggering. In total, the Chinese central and local governments have announced hundreds of billions of euros of funding in the form of subsidies, funds and other channels of support. There is no doubt that China’s continuous, growing investments in research and development (R&D), and attempts to encourage∙its∙domestic∙industry∙to∙strive∙for∙quality∙and∙efficiency∙have∙a∙great∙deal∙of∙merit.∙However,∙the∙broad∙set∙ of policy tools that are being employed to facilitate CM2025’s development are highly problematic.2 This has already created problems for both China’s economy and European business. Under recently passed legislation in the new energy vehicle (NEV) industry, for example, European business is facing intense pressure to turn over advanced technology in exchange for near-term market access; in the field of industrial robotics, government subsidies are contributing to overcapacity in the low- and mid-tiers of China’s market; and in the information technology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master's Degree Programme
    Master’s Degree programme in Lingue, economie e istituzioni dell’Asia e dell’Africa mediterranea “Second Cycle (D.M. 270/2004)” Final Thesis The Evolving Framework of Chinese Outbound M&A The case of Inter Supervisor Ch. Prof. Renzo Riccardo Cavalieri Assistant supervisor Ch. Prof. Franco Gatti Graduand Valentina Coccato 841509 Academic Year 2016/2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 前言 ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter One: China’s Outbound M&A ............................................................................... 10 1.1 Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment ............................................................ 10 1.2 Government role and regulations .............................................................................. 14 1.3 Policymaking actors .................................................................................................. 16 1.3.1 Top Level ............................................................................................................ 16 1.3.2 Second level ........................................................................................................ 17 1.3.3 Third level ........................................................................................................... 18 1.3.4 Fourth level ......................................................................................................... 20 1.4 OFDI Approval Procedure: A Changing Framework ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • EVOLVING MADE in CHINA 2025 Priority Adjustments and Implications for Europe’S Innovation Capacity
    MERICS PAPERS ON CHINA Preview EVOLVING MADE IN CHINA 2025 Priority adjustments and implications for Europe’s innovation capacity Max J. Zenglein | Anna Holzmann Evolving Made in China 2025 Evolving Made in China 2025: Priority adjustments and implications for Europe’s innovation capacity by Max J. Zenglein and Anna Holzmann KEY POINTS In the first three years after its release, industrial policy scheme aimed at propel- China’s industrial masterplan Made in China ling China towards global tech leadership. 2025 has been repeatedly adapted to fit Chinese authorities have identified en- a changing internal and external environ- gagement with emerging industries as ment. great opportunities to get ahead of ad- Against the backdrop of an escalating vanced economies. trade conflict with the United States and Europe’s innovation landscape is already growing pushback against ambitious in- subject to Chinese pressure stemming dustrial policies, China has toned down its from its advances to spearhead future assertive rhetoric. In practice, the roll-out technologies such as batteries for electric of Made in China 2025 is in full swing. vehicles (EVs) and Artificial Intelligence The strategy is part of a sophisticated (AI). Made in China A lot has happened since the release of the Made in China 2025 strategy in 2015. The plan de- 2025 promotes fines ten core industries that China wants to upgrade to compete on a global scale. These include greater new-generation information technology, high-end computerized machines and robots, aviation independence and space equipment, energy-saving and new energy vehicles, and new materials. However, over the course of the past three years, it has become evident that the ambitions and impact of the and, ultimately, industrial policy go far beyond these core industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Made in China 2025
    Made in China 2025 China’s Industrial Vision and New Zealand 6th July 2018 Paul Dupont NZCCRC Made in China 2025 Published by the New Zealand Contemporary China Research Centre Victoria University of Wellington Wellington, New Zealand 2018 © New Zealand Contemporary China Research Centre ISBN PDF: 978-0-473-44806-6 2 NZCCRC Made in China 2025 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 6 3. Background: What is the “13th Five-Year Plan”? ......................................................................... 6 4. What is “Made in China 2025”? ................................................................................................. 7 5. Why did the Chinese government start MIC2025? ..................................................................... 9 6. What is the government’s MIC2025 Action Plan? ..................................................................... 12 7. What opportunities does MIC2025 present for the Chinese government? ............................... 13 8. What are the risks of MIC2025? ............................................................................................... 13 9. What is the international reaction to MIC2025? ....................................................................... 15 10. How will MIC2025 impact New Zealand? ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Made in China 2025 and the Future of American Industry”
    Testimony of Robert D. Atkinson President Information Technology and Innovation Foundation Before the Senate Small Business Committee Hearing on “Made in China 2025 and the Future of American Industry” February 27, 2019 Washington, DC Good afternoon Chairman Rubio, Ranking Member Cardin and members of the Committee; thank you for inviting me to share the views of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) on the issue of unfair Chinese trade and technology policies and practices and what the federal government should do in response. The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation is a non-partisan think tank whose mission is to formulate and promote public policies to advance technological innovation and productivity internationally, in Washington, and in the states. Recognizing the vital role of technology in ensuring prosperity, ITIF focuses on innovation, productivity, and digital economy issues. ITF has long focused on the issue of not only how unfair foreign policies and practices, particularly Chinese, negatively impact the U.S. economy, but why and how the federal government should establish a robust national competitiveness and innovation policy. I very much appreciate the opportunity to comment on these issues today. In my testimony I first discuss the importance for a new framework for how to think about the economic challenge from China and the key points in this regard raised in the recent report from Chairman Rubio – “Made in China 2025 and the Future of American Industry”. Second, I discuss the nature of China economic challenge from “Made in China, 2025.” Finally, discuss components for more robust trade, innovation and competitiveness strategies, including components to help small businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Made in China 2025 Plan
    MADE IN CHINA 2025 China Manufacturing in the 21st Century - Opportunities for UK-China Partnership www.cbbc.org www.ukti.gov.uk Contents Forewords 02 Executive Summary 04 Background to Made in China 2025 06 The State Council’s Plan 08 Ten Priority Sectors 09 Five Nationwide Initiatives 12 Specific Objectives 13 Opportunities by Sector 14 Opportunities by Location 15 Opportunities for UK Companies 17 Challenges for UK Companies 18 Conclusions & Next Steps 20 Appendix 22 Contacts 23 www.ukti.gov.uk www.cbbc.org | 01 Foreword Dr Mark Wareing Director Advanced Manufacturing & Transport UKTI China, British Embassy, Beijing UK Trade & Investment Together we provide a comprehensive service for British (UKTI) is the part of companies who are looking at the incredible opportunities UK Government that is in China and we bring more Chinese companies to the UK responsible for growing to join the UK’s leading innovation landscape to create the the UK’s exports and products for the future, for China and the world. attracting investment into the UK. Made in China 2025 is a truly exciting strategy and it is fantastic to see how closely the skills, experience and In terms of UK exports, capability of the UK’s industrial base align with China’s China is already our ambitions. In all of the 10 priority sectors China has second largest single identified, the UK is a world leader with the expertise to export destination with help China reach its goals. exports of £18.7 billion, of which £15.5 billion (83%) We see the next stage of China’s emergence as an economic are manufactured goods superpower in its ambition to design and make the products which demonstrates the of the future required not only by the Chinese consumer, but importance of manufacturing to the UK economy.
    [Show full text]
  • “Made in China 2025” and Implications for Healthcare Mncs
    GPS Healthcare Quarterly Innovation in China, “Made in China 2025” and Implications for Healthcare MNCs July 2018 This paper considers the market, competitive and regulatory dynamics driving homegrown innovation in healthcare in China, details the key “Made in China 2025” policy as it applies in healthcare, and outlines the impact these developments are having on multinational healthcare firms in China. Context During the past four decades, China’s economy has rocketed to become the second-largest in the world. Now, however, it is facing different challenges: The working-age population has peaked, employment costs continue to rise rapidly, and the RMB has become stronger. As a result, China is finding it difficult to maintain its stellar growth on the basis of being a low-cost manufacturing center. In their efforts to avoid the middle income trap that affects many emerging economies, China’s leading policymakers have focused on raising productivity and bolstering innovation to upgrade China’s economy. During the past decade, innovation, especially domestic innovation, has been gaining attention and driving government and private investment into biopharmaceuticals, medical technology and healthcare delivery. In transitioning to a higher-value-added ecosystem, China’s government has introduced healthcare system reforms in wide-ranging areas including government funding for research and development, overhaul of market authorization requirements, product accreditations, procurement evaluations, management of the distribution channel, pricing, and payment. While these reforms are certainly intended to be beneficial in the domestic market, some are seen as controversial — especially those with an industrial policy dimension where China is sponsoring indigenous development of technologies that are destined to become competitive in the global marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Industrial Policy Plan Made in China 2025
    China’s Industrial Policy Plan Made in China 2025 An analysis of motives, implementation and effectiveness of China’s industrial policy plan Made in China 2025 Master Thesis M.Sc. International Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School Submitted January 15th, 2020 Next Generation IT Biomedicine & high-performance High-end numerical control medical machinery and RoBotics equipment Aviation and New Materials space equipment Made in China 2025 Agricultural Maritime engineering Equipment & high-tech ships Energy Advanced railway Equipment transportation equipment Energy- saving & new energy vehicles Author: Erik Wernberg-Tougaard Supervisor: Prof. Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard, Department of International Economics and Management, CBS STU count and standard pages: 181,033 characters, 79,5 standard pages Table of Contents I. Abstract II. List of figures III. List of tables IV. List of abbreviation 1 INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 RESEARCH QUESTION 10 1.2 DELIMITATION 12 1.3 THE STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS 13 2 METHODOLOGY 14 2.1 PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 14 2.2 RESEARCH DESIGN – THE CASE STUDY APPROACH 15 2.3 DATA RELIABILITY AND STATISTICAL DATA FROM CHINA 17 2.4 LANGUAGE 19 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 19 3.1 DEFINING INDUSTRIAL POLICY (IP) 21 3.2 IP IN A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 22 3.2.1 THE WESTERN COUNTRIES 22 3.2.2 THE ASIAN ECONOMIES 24 3.2.3 CHINA 26 3.3 THE DEBATES IN IP 27 3.3.1 THE CASE AND ARGUMENTS FOR IP 28 3.3.2 THE CASE AND ARGUMENTS AGAINST IP 30 3.4 IP-INSTRUMENTS 30 3.5 IP TODAY 32 3.5.1 INDUSTRIALISATION 4.0 33 3.5.2 GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS 34 4 THE CASE:
    [Show full text]
  • Selling to Made in China 2025: Opportunities & Challenges
    Selling to Made in China 2025: Opportunities & Challenges Selling to Made in China 2025 Opportunities and challenges presented by China’s initiative to become a global leader in quality manufacturing October 2018 Accelerating Adoption of the IoT ONE Limited | www.iotone.com | Accelerating the Industrial Internet of Things Industrial Internet of Things0 Selling to Made in China 2025: Opportunities & ChallengesChallenges Table of Contents Industrial IoT market potential in China . .. 2 Digitized manufacturing in China: Why now? . 3 Current climate of Industrial IoT in China . 4 Industrial IoT trends in China . 5 China’s 13th Five-Year Plan . 6 Made in China 2025 Overview . 7 Priorities by region . 8 Pilot projects (2015 – 16) . 9 China Intelligent Manufacturing Solutions Vendor Alliance . 12 Evaluating Made in China 2025 . 14 Organizations supporting industrial upgrading . 15 Industrial IoT companies in China . .. 16 Featured Case Studies . .17 Summary . 22 About IoT ONE . 23 IoT ONE Limited | www.iotone.com | Accelerating the Industrial Internet of ThingsThings 1 Selling to Made in China 2025: Opportunities & Challenges Industrial IoT market potential in China The Government of China was the first to launch a China is already the world’s second largest market for Industrial comprehensive Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) strategy, IoT technologies, despite initially-low adoption rates compared announced in the ‘12th Five-Year Plan’ in 2011. According to IoT to North America and Europe. Deloitte reports that China Analytics, the industry will start to see some of the early outnumbers the amount of Smart City projects being piloted investments pay-off in 2018. than all other countries combined.
    [Show full text]
  • CHINA OUTLOOK 2018 a New Era, a New Paradigm of Globalisation
    CHINA OUTLOOK 2018 A new era, a new paradigm of globalisation 2018 kpmg.com/globalchina Contents Foreword 4 1. Business environment: China’s ‘new economic cycle’ and the ‘new paradigm of globalisation’ 1 China’s economy enters the second half of an L-shaped recovery 6 1.1 After the global financial crisis, China went through six years of declining growth 1.2 Early signs of China’s economic recovery began to emerge in the second half of 2016 1.3 2018: Consolidating the foundations of China’s economic recovery 1.4 Twists and turns in China’s L-shaped recovery 2 China on the verge of a ‘new economic cycle’ 15 2.1 The emergence of the seventh economic cycle since the ‘reform and opening up’ era began 2.2 Supply-side structural reforms provide a strong foundation for the ‘new economic cycle’ 2.3 The 19th CPC National Congress – a political starting point for the ‘new economic cycle’ 2.4 The ‘new economic cycle’ signals China’s third 30-year period of economic transformation 2.5 The engines of the ‘new economic cycle’ are evolving relative to those of the ‘old economic cycle’ 3 China’s ‘new economic cycle’ will boost the resilience of 28 global growth 3.1 China’s importance in the global economy has increased markedly 3.2 China’s shift from a ‘receiver’ of global economic cycles to an ‘initiator’ 3.3 China’s ‘new economic cycle’ is set to drive the recovery of the global economy 4 Implementation of the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative advances the 30 ‘new paradigm of globalisation’ 4.1 Globalisation drove half a century of cross-border trade and investment
    [Show full text]
  • Made in China 2025 and the Future of American Industry
    S. HRG. 116–22 MADE IN CHINA 2025 AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN INDUSTRY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION FEBRUARY 27, 2019 Printed for the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 35–699 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 13:23 Jun 03, 2019 Jkt 032694 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\35699.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Chairman BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland, Ranking Member JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho MARIA CANTWELL, Washington RAND PAUL, Kentucky JEANNE SHAHEEN, NEW HAMPSHIRE TIM SCOTT, South Carolina EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts JONI ERNST, Iowa CORY A. BOOKER, New Jersey JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware TODD YOUNG, Indiana MAZIE K. HIRONO, Hawaii JOHN KENNEDY, Louisiana TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois MITT ROMNEY, Utah JACKY ROSEN, Nevada JOSH HAWLEY, Missouri MICHAEL A. NEEDHAM, Republican Staff Director SEAN MOORE, Democratic Staff Director (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 13:23 Jun 03, 2019 Jkt 032694 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\35699.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER CONTENTS OPENING STATEMENTS Page Rubio, Hon. Marco, Chairman, a U.S. Senator from Florida ............................... 1 Cardin, Hon. Benjamin L., Ranking Member, a U.S. Senator from Maryland .. 3 WITNESSES Setser, Mr. Brad, Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations, New York, NY ......................................................................................................................... 5 Atkinson, Mr. Robert, President, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Washington, DC .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Made in China 2025 & Internet Plus: the 4Th
    1 "Made In China 2025 & Internet Plus: The 4th Industrial Revolution" Opportunities for Foreign Invested Enterprises in China Background In March 2015, Premier Li Keqiang formally announced the 'Made in China 2025' ("MIC 2025”) initiative which aligned with the 13th Five Year Plan ("FYP”), Internet Plus and outbound focused policy of the Belt & Road Initiative ("BRI”) is centred on reforming and modernising China's manufacturing sector. Influenced by the Industry 4.0 roadmap set out by Germany in 2013, Premier Li commented at the official announcement that 'Made in China 2025' will "upgrade China from a manufacturer of quantity to a manufacturer of quality”. This roadmap has been established to build a thriving innovation led economy through to 2025 and beyond. Traditionally, China's manufacturing sector has been built up around cheap, labour intensive production which has served China well in rising to become the second most powerful global economy as of present. However faced with cheaper manufacturing labour now being sourced from South East Asia and other emerging economies, weakening demand for exports particularly in the US and Europe, overcapacity and as shown in the Global Innovation Index Report 2015, an Innovation Gap to other developed economies, China is at a crossroads as it positions itself to enable the transition from 'Big Industrial Economy' to 'Powerful Industrial Economy'. Industrial modernisation and reform are therefore at the heart of the government's strategic agenda with President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang identifying the explicit need for China to transition towards manufacturing high-tech machinery and being at the forefront of global innovation in order to remain competitive in the face of the next level economic challenges resulting from its rapid growth.
    [Show full text]
  • China and the World: Inside the Dynamics of a Changing Relationship
    China and the world Inside the dynamics of a changing relationship July 2019 McKinsey Global Institute Since its founding in 1990, the McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) has sought to develop a deeper understanding of the evolving global economy. As the business and economics research arm of McKinsey & Company, MGI aims to provide leaders in the commercial, public, and social sectors with the facts and insights on which to base management and policy decisions. MGI research combines the disciplines of economics and management, employing the analytical tools of economics with the insights of business leaders. Our “micro-to-macro” methodology examines microeconomic industry trends to better understand the broad macroeconomic forces affecting business strategy and public policy. MGI’s in-depth reports have covered more than 20 countries and 30 industries. Current research focuses on six themes: productivity and growth, natural resources, labor markets, the evolution of global financial markets, the economic impact of technology and innovation, and urbanization. Recent reports have assessed the digital economy, the impact of AI and automation on employment, income inequality, the productivity puzzle, the economic benefits of tackling gender inequality, a new era of global competition, Chinese innovation, and digital and financial globalization. MGI is led by three McKinsey & Company senior partners: Jacques Bughin, Jonathan Woetzel, and James Manyika, who also serves as the chairman of MGI. Michael Chui, Susan Lund, Anu Madgavkar, Jan Mischke, Sree Ramaswamy, and Jaana Remes are MGI partners, and Mekala Krishnan and Jeongmin Seong are MGI senior fellows. Project teams are led by the MGI partners and a group of senior fellows and include consultants from McKinsey offices around the world.
    [Show full text]