Evolutionary Mismatch in Mating. Frontiers
fpsyg-10-02709 December 2, 2019 Time: 13:50 # 1 HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY published: 04 December 2019 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02709 Evolutionary Mismatch in Mating Cari D. Goetz1*, Elizabeth G. Pillsworth2, David M. Buss3 and Daniel Conroy-Beam4 1 Department of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, United States, 2 Division of Anthropology, Evolutionary Anthropology Program, California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, United States, 3 Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States, 4 Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States Evolutionary mismatch concepts are being fruitfully employed in a number of research domains, including medicine, health, and human cognition and behavior to generate novel hypotheses and better understand existing findings. We contend that research on human mating will benefit from explicitly addressing both the evolutionary mismatch of the people we study and the evolutionary mismatch of people conducting the research. We identified nine mismatch characteristics important to the study of human mating and reviewed the literature related to each of these characteristics. Many of the people we study are: exposed to social media, in temporary relationships, relocatable, autonomous in their mating decisions, nulliparous, in groups that are socially segmented, in an educational setting, confronted with lots of options, and young. We applied mismatch Edited by: concepts to each characteristic to illustrate the importance of incorporating mismatch Xiaomeng Xu, Idaho State University, United States into this research area. Our aim in this paper is not to identify all potential mismatch Reviewed by: effects in mating research, nor to challenge or disqualify existing data.
[Show full text]