DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation and Update of MASH Test Vehicles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Mechanical (and Materials) Engineering -- Mechanical & Materials Engineering, Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research Department of Spring 4-28-2020 Evaluation and Update of MASH Test Vehicles Kellon B. Ronspies University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mechengdiss Part of the Materials Science and Engineering Commons, and the Mechanical Engineering Commons Ronspies, Kellon B., "Evaluation and Update of MASH Test Vehicles" (2020). Mechanical (and Materials) Engineering -- Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research. 158. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mechengdiss/158 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mechanical & Materials Engineering, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mechanical (and Materials) Engineering -- Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. EVALUATION AND UPDATE OF MASH TEST VEHICLES by Kellon Ronspies A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics Under the Supervision of Professor Cody Stolle Lincoln, Nebraska April 28, 2020 EVALUATION AND UPDATE OF MASH TEST VEHICLES Kellon Ronspies, M.S. University of Nebraska, 2020 Advisor: Cody Stolle The Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) requires full-scale crash testing of roadside features using worst practical impact conditions. Vehicle selection for full-scale crash testing is intended to be representative of the contemporary passenger vehicle fleet. Researchers at the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) investigated attributes of passenger vehicle sales to determine if the vehicle selection criteria shown in MASH should be revised to accommodate changes in the vehicle fleet. A methodology was considered to affordably re-analyze the vehicle fleet when necessary to ensure MASH vehicle selection criteria are reflective of vehicles currently on roadways. Representative vehicles were documented using sales data, and registration and crash data were observed to validate sales data use. Findings suggest compact utility vehicles (CUVs), small cars, mid-size cars, and pickup trucks comprise the most common vehicles on U.S. roadways. New vehicle sales data indicated that the 5th and 95th percentile weights were approximately 2,800 lb and 5,850 lb, respectively. A suite of 4-door, gas-powered, base trim level car options was identified which was consistent with the targeted small car weight, and the Hyundai Elantra was recommended as the MASH small passenger vehicle. Relatively few pickup truck options were identified at the 95th percentile weight. Therefore, the 92.5 percentile weight of 5,400 lb was recommended for the large passenger vehicle. A four-wheel drive (4WD), ½-ton suspension, crew cab pickup truck was identified as the target vehicle class, and the Ram 1500 was recommended as the MASH large passenger vehicle. Potential intermediate passenger vehicles were also explored, and four vehicle classes (two mid-size sedans and two CUV classes) were identified as potential passenger vehicle candidates. CUVs have never been used in crash testing, and implementation of a CUV crash testing program or ISPE is imperative to begin to evaluation CUV impact behavior with different roadside hardware (guardrails, concrete barriers, cable barriers, etc.). Additionally, a crash test program should be implemented immediately to begin testing of the recommended MASH small and large passenger vehicles. Updated MASH passenger vehicle properties and a method for continually updating vehicle selection criteria are herein recommended. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To begin, thank you to the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) for providing the opportunity to work toward improving roadside safety and saving lives. Special thanks to this project’s research team: Dr. Cody Stolle, Dr. Ronald Faller, and Bob Bielenberg. Thank you to Karla, Jim, Scott, Dr. Rasmussen, Dr. Reid, Dr. Pajouh, Dr. Steelman, Valerie, Erin, Justine, Jim, Dave, Bunky, Alex, Justin, Richard, Shaun, and everyone else at the office and test site. I have much enjoyed the comradery and teamwork we’ve been a part of together at MwRSF, and it’s been a pleasure working alongside all of you. The work ethic and commitment to excellence I see at the offices and test site every day are unparalleled, and I’m honored to have worked with this organization the last few years. Thank you to everyone for contributing to a fun and enlightening work environment by challenging each other’s ideas, sharing stories, and working together to create life-saving roadside engineering solutions. I would also like to thank the sponsors of this project - the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, in conduction with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. Additionally, thank you to the project review panel – Kelly, Will, Mark, Bernie, Erik, and John. Developing a methodology to identify representative vehicles for crash testing was both insightful and challenging. I greatly appreciate the opportunity to work on this project, and I look forward to carrying on the expertise and knowledge gained from this experience. I’d also like to thank Josh and Connor for your diligent work on crash data analysis and contributions to this project. To all the past and present GRAs, may we never forget what we learned our first couple days reading MASH and the Roadside Design Guide. Thanks to all of you for the late nights and fun times working together. Whether doing homework and projects, bouncing workplace ideas, or v being a support group for another – you’ve all been like family to me these last couple years. I’m going to miss our GRA meetings, lunches, outings, and DC memories. To Nathan, Ryan, Luis, Miguel, Michael, Ricardo, Elise, Jessica, Jacob, Andy, Jared, Sam, Seok Hwan, Tewodros, and Francisco – thanks for the great memories and looking forward to seeing the amazing things you all do in the future. To my family, I can’t thank you enough for your unconditional love and support. Mom, Dad, Emily, Trevon, Ryan, Ashlyn, and Macklyn – you guys all motivate me, challenge me, and make me laugh, and your patience with me through these last forty years of college (more like 9½) has been unwavering. You all are the reason I am the person I am today. Love you all, and thank you for everything. I’d also like to thank all my friends (you know who you are) for the great memories and being there for one another. We’ve had a lot of fun together, and I’m excited to share our futures together and see you all continue achieving your goals. Lastly, I’d like to thank Dr. Cody Stolle. I am forever grateful to you and Dr. Faller for the opportunity to contribute to MwRSF as a GRA. Cody, I can’t thank you enough for your guidance and tutelage. You taught me most of the things I know about engineering processes and have challenged and encouraged me time and again to be the best engineer possible. Thank you for your leadership and for the hours of tangential conversation – whether it was engineering or general life. I greatly appreciate all of work and sacrifices you make for each of us GRAs and for MwRSF. Thanks for being a great advisor, mentor of faith, and an even better friend. vi DISCLAIMER STATEMENT This report was completed with funding from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). The contents of this report reflect the views and opinions of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the NCHRP, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and United States Department of Transportation (USDOT). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, regulation, product endorsement, or an endorsement of manufacturers. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER STATEMENT ...................................................................................................... vi TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. vii 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Research Objective ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Research Approach ....................................................................................................... 4 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Historical Crash Testing Standards ............................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Historical Crash Test Guidelines ..................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Volume 07.02.09 the Hummer Club, Inc. ®

    Volume 07.02.09 the Hummer Club, Inc. ®

    VOLUME 07.02.09 THE HUMMER CLUB, INC. ® Photo by Roger Robohm CONTENTS M AY 2009 Features A WEEKEND AT RAUSCH CREEK 08 Rausch Creek 2009 SEDONA AND SNOW 10 Snow Run! HOLE IN THE ROCK 14 My Summer Vacation GRAY ROCK CHALLENGE 20 Mount Olive, Alabama SPOTTING RULES 24 Be a Great Spotter and a Great Driver OOPS! 32 Things Don’t Always Go As Planned Departments PResident’s messAGE 05 Looking forward to Kinzalow CLUB NEWS 06 Join the Board of Directors TECH TIP 30 Checking Your Brakes COVER PHOTOGRAPH BY JOHN BYRON Photo: Chris Blood AZIMUTH 1 Club Directors Marshall Henderson Glen Peck Director - President Director - CFO/Membership/HOPE 289 Rolling Hill Road [email protected] Mooresville, NC 28117 704-663-6510 (home) Mike Morris 704-309-9427 (cellular) Director [email protected] PO Box 2288 South Bend, IN 46680 Bob DeVore 2500 Green Tech Drive Director - Events/Land Use South Bend, IN 46613 8390 Cappy Lane 574-232-6000 (work) Swartz Creek, MI 48473 [email protected] 810-691-5087 [email protected] Rick Grucz Director - Ambassador Program Manny MacMillan 6446 Sober Rd. Director - Azimuth Fowlerville, MI 48836 [email protected] 517-223-4885 (home) 517-223-8551 (fax) Hal Dilworth [email protected] Director - Secretary [email protected] 2 AZIMUTH The HUMMER Club, Inc. is a non-profit mutual benefit corporation organized under the California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law. We are a national organization dedicated to promoting the safe use of the HUMMER in a family oriented atmosphere. We emphasize responsible four-wheeling and are serious about safety and environmentally correct off-roading.
  • Ford Recalls 4.5 Million Additional Vehicles in Switch Recall Faulty Part Could Cause Fire; Largest Recall in Ford’S History

    Ford Recalls 4.5 Million Additional Vehicles in Switch Recall Faulty Part Could Cause Fire; Largest Recall in Ford’S History

    NYS Department of State safetyOFPC ALERT October NY STATE FIRE 2009 Ford Recalls 4.5 Million Additional Vehicles In Switch Recall Faulty Part Could Cause Fire; Largest Recall In Ford’s History Ford Motor Co. says it will add 4.5 million older-model vehicles to the list of those recalled because a defective cruise control switch could cause a fire. Ford says 1.1 million Ford Windstar minivans will be recalled for repairs due to a small risk of fires. The company says another 3.4 million Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles with the same switches also will be recalled even though there have been no reports of fires. Those vehicles mainly are trucks and SUVs. All vehicles covered by the recall are from the 1992 to 2003 model years. This is Ford’s seventh recall due to the Texas Instruments speed control switches. The recalls cover a total of 14.3 million vehicles and combined are the largest in Ford’s history Summary of the Ford Fire Recalls Both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Ford Motor Co. have issued several recalls of millions of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles as a result of a defective cruise control switch that can lead to a spontaneous fire, even when the vehicle is turned off, parked and unattended. The most recent of this Ford cruise control recalls occurred on September 9, 2008, when the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration re-recalled millions of Ford, Lincoln and Mercury SUV’s pickup trucks, vans and cars. This advisory was the second recall warning from the safety agency issued in 2008 and is meant to bring in nearly 5 million cars, trucks and SUVs which still have not been brought in for repair since an earlier recall of 12 million vehicles in February 2008.
  • FCA US LLC – J2534 Supported Vehicles “Reference Chart”

    FCA US LLC – J2534 Supported Vehicles “Reference Chart”

    FCA US LLC – J2534 Supported Vehicles “Reference Chart” wiTECH 2.0 J2534 Application* (wiTECH 2.0 and TechAuthority Subscriptions are required) Model Year Vehicles (Body Codes) 2010 – Present All Vehicles 2009 DR/DS, HB, HG, J8, JC, JK, JS, KA, KK, LC, LX, MK, ND, PM, PT, RM, RT, WK, XK 2008 DR, HB, HG, J8, JC, JK, JS, KA, KK, LC, LX, MK, ND, PM, PT, RT, WK, XK 2007 DR, HB, HG, JK, JS, KA, LX, MK, ND, PM, WK, XK * Many vehicles have 3 CAN buses which require a J2534 device that supports 3 hardware CAN channels. Please make sure your J2534 device supports 3 CAN channels before purchasing a wiTECH 2.0 Subscription. Click here to view a list of wiTECH 2.0 verified J2534 devices. * Windows 10 is the only operating system that is supported by wiTECH 2.0 J2534 Application. Please make sure you have a Windows 10 PC before purchasing a wiTECH 2.0 Subscription. Click here to view wiTECH 2.0 J2534 PC requirements. * wiTECH 2.0 J2534 Application supports ECU flash reprogramming, Diagnostics, Data Read, DTCs, Routines, and System Tests. Chrysler J2534 Flash Application** Model Year Vehicles (Body Codes) 1995 – 2009 All Vehicles ** Supports ECU flash reprogramming for emission control modules only (ECM, PCM, TCM and CTV). ** To perform diagnostics, data read, routines, and system tests on an applicable vehicle, an OEM FCA US LLC scan tool (DRBIII or StarSCAN) is required if the vehicle is not supported by wiTECH 2.0 J2534 application. To lease the DRBIII, call 1-586-532-8494 or Click here.
  • Infiniti-Qx70-2014-Eu

    Infiniti-Qx70-2014-Eu

    70 THE DARING The vehicle that continues to break new ground between sport, utility and modern art, the Infiniti QX70 escapes all classification. It’s a luxury crossover of high reward, unabashedly bold design and surprising versatility. And yet, it’s motivated by the soul of a sports car. Uncompromising in its vision, it’s a manifesto in motion proclaiming that some are satisfied only when they write their own rules. THE EXCEPTION A rare few move through the world with a confidence FORWARD COLLISION WARNING (FCW)1 scans ahead with LANE DEPARTURE PREVENTION (LDP) watches INTELLIGENT CRUISE CONTROL (ICC) borne of intelligence and speed. An acute sense of relaxed laser sensors to help warn you of a potential collision road markings with a camera and can subtly apply automatically reduces your speed when the readiness stemming from technology that is always on and can trigger Intelligent Brake Assist (IBA) to apply the brakes to help keep your vehicle from traffic in front of you slows down. When the lookout. When you’re prepared, you’re in total control. the brakes to help minimise an unavoidable collision. unintentionally drifting from your lane. Traffic the way is clear, it accelerates back to your may surround you, but so will confidence. desired speed. Less effort, more ease. THE POWER Don’t waste the opportunity for excitement that lives in SIGNATURE EXHAUST NOTE enhances your ACCELERATION SWELL transforms mechanical every moment. With performance at the core of the QX70, driving experience with a thrilling growl. power into emotional excitement. Precise the rush is always ready.
  • Toyota Imports Two Sample Toyopet Crown Sedans to the US This Marks

    Toyota Imports Two Sample Toyopet Crown Sedans to the US This Marks

    1957: •Toyota imports two sample Toyopet Crown sedans to the U.S. This marks the first effort by Toyota to enter the North American market. •Toyota files for a retail dealer’s license with the State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles. •October 31, Toyota Motor Sales is founded and establishes headquarters in a former Rambler dealership in Hollywood, Toyopet Crown sedans California. 1958: • First Toyopet Crown sales in U.S., MSRP listed at $2,300. First year sales total 287. • Toyota signs up 45 dealers. The first Toyota dealers in the U.S. are at Holt Motors of Van Nuys, California, and Rose Toyota of San Diego, California. • Toyota Motor Distributors is founded as the distribution and marketing arm of Toyota Motor Sales. First Toyota Motor Sales Headquarters • The first Toyota parts warehouse is established in Long Beach, California. 1959: •Toyota sells 967 Toyopet Crown sedans in the U.S. Even though sales increase, Toyota recognizes the deficiencies of the Toyopet Crown for the American market. The Toyopet had trouble passing California road regulations, and was underpowered for high- speed freeway travel. 1960: •Toyota sells a total of 821 vehicles in the U.S., 659 Toyopet Crown sedans and station 1959 Toyopet Crown wagons, and the rest Land Cruisers. •Declining sales of the Toyopet Crown signal a retrenchment of Toyota automobile sales. Toyota begins development of a new car specifically designed for the American market. •Toyota has a network of 70 dealers in the U.S. Toyopet Crown advertisement 1961: •Toyota introduces the Tiara to the U.S. The Tiara sells for $1,638.
  • Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks

    Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks

    U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT HS 808 570 January 1997 NHTSA Technical Report Relationships between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Go ,i on No. 3, Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 808 570 4. Title ond Subtitle 5. Report Dote January 1997 Relationships Between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk 6. Performing Organization Code in Model Year 1985-93 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 8. Performing Organization Report No 7. Author's) Charles J. Kahane, Ph.D. 9. Performing Organization Name ond Address 10. Wort Unit No. (TRAIS) Evaluation Division, Plans and Policy National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 11. Conrroct or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20590 13. Type of Report and Period Cohered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 15. Supplementary. Notes NHTSA Reports DOT HS 808 569 through DOT HS 808 575 address vehicle size and safety. 16. Abstract Fatality rates per million exposure years are computed by make, model and model year, based on the crash experience of model year 1985-93 passenger cars and light trucks (pickups, vans and sport utility vehicles) in the United States during calendar years 1989-93.
  • HO Scale Price List 2019

    HO Scale Price List 2019

    GAUGEMASTER HO Scale price list 2019 Prices correct at time of going to press and are subject to change at any time Post free option is available for orders above a value of £15 to mainland UK addresses*. Non-mainland UK orders are posted at cost. Orders to non-EC destinations are VAT free. *Except orders containing one or more items above a length of 600mm and below a total order value of £25. Order conforming to this exception will be charged carriage at cost (not to exceed £4.95) Gaugemaster Controls Ltd Gaugemaster House Ford Road Arundel West Sussex BN18 0BN Tel - (01903) 884321 Fax - (01903) 884377 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Printed: 06/09/2019 KEY TO PRICE LISTS The following legends appear at the front of the Product Name for certain entries: * : New Item not yet available # : Not in production, stock available #D# : Discontinued, few remaining #P# : New Item, limited availability www.gaugemaster.com Registered in England No: 2714470. Registered Office: Gaugemaster House, Ford Road, Arundel, West Sussex, BN18 0BN. Directors: R K Taylor, D J Taylor. Bankers: Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, South Street, Chichester, West Sussex, England. Sort Code: 16-16-20 Account No: 11318851 VAT reg: 587 8089 71 1 Contents Atlas 3 Magazines/Books 38 Atlas O 5 Marklin 38 Bachmann 5 Marklin Club 42 Busch 5 Mehano 43 Cararama 8 Merten 43 Dapol 9 Model Power 43 Dapol Kits 9 Modelcraft 43 DCC Concepts 9 MRC 44 Deluxe Materials 11 myWorld 44 DM Toys 11 Noch 44 Electrotren 11 Oxford Diecast 53 Faller 12
  • Daimler-Chrysler-Vehicle-Problems

    Daimler-Chrysler-Vehicle-Problems

    Dodge Chrysler Vehicles - Poor Quality Reliability Safety Defects Page 1 of 17 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DODGE CHRYSLER VEHICLES - IMPORTANT CONSUMER INFORMATION BEFORE YOU BUY Dodge, Chrysler formerly DaimlerChrysler has had a history of excessive vehicle quality issues, safety defects and poor service. This continued despite the 1998 Chrysler merger with Daimler Benz and constant claims by DaimlerChrysler that this was a significant benefit to consumers. If anything, given the dramatic quality decline, it seems Mercedes Benz may have embraced some of the cost cutting quality standards at Chrysler to increase overall profitability. The problems continue despite stylish new vehicles and claims of new stringent quality standards by Chrysler to regain consumer confidence. Chrysler continues to deceive consumers regarding known potentially life threatening vehicle defects such as unsafe Seatbelts and Steering which continue to put consumer lives at risk every day. Chrysler still refuses to recall several common serious safety defects that cannot be absolved through mergers and buyouts. Chrysler continues to reduce its warranty expense through an aggressive refusal to honor many valid warranty claims while blaming the consumer whenever possible, such as defective engines where on schedule oil changes can be proven. Consumers often attribute this to being a dealer problem while failing to recognize that this is because Chrysler pressures dealers to keep warranty costs to a minimum, even for known problems and defects. Chrysler will do everything it can to avoid covering common problems under warranty whenever possible by blaming consumers or claiming issues cannot be duplicated. We believe Chrysler is the most negligent, deceptive, misleading and arrogant automobile manufacturer that does not deserve your business.
  • Au 81 Vechicl3e Body Engg Notes

    Au 81 Vechicl3e Body Engg Notes

    UNIT 1- CAR BODY DETAILS Cars can come in a large variety of different body styles . Some are still in production, while others are of historical interest only. These styles are largely (though not completely) independent of a car's classification in terms of price, size and intended broad market; the same car model might be available in multiple body styles (or model ranges ). For some of the following terms, especially relating to four-wheel drive / SUV models and minivan / MPV models, the distinction between body style and classification is particularly narrow. Please note that while each body style has a historical and technical definition, in common usage such definitions are often blurred. Over time, the common usage of each term evolves. For example, people often call 4-passenger sport coupés a "sports car", while purists will insist that a sports car by definition is limited to two-place vehicles. Body work In automotive engineering , the bodywork of an automobile is the structure which protects: ⦁ The occupants ⦁ Any other payload ⦁ The mechanical components. In vehicles with a separate frame or chassis , the term bodywork is normally applied to only the non-structural panels, including doors and other movable panels, but it may also be used more generally to include the structural components which support the mechanical components. Construction There are three main types of automotive bodywork: ⦁ The first automobiles were designs adapted in large part from horse-drawn carriages, and had body-on-frame construction with a wooden frame and wooden or metal body panels. Wooden-framed motor vehicles remain in production to this day, with many of the cars made by the Morgan Motor Company still having wooden structures underlying their bodywork.
  • Infiniti Q X7 0

    Infiniti Q X7 0

    QX70 INFINITI QX70 INFINITI EMPOWER THE DRIVE We are like you. We push ourselves beyond our comfort zone. While others might be content with making better machines, we are driven to go beyond—to design cars that push human potential. We build technology to enhance your senses, striking design that demands a response and performance that makes you feel more alive. Prepare to experience the road as it was intended. INFINITI QX70 Empower the drive with an unmistakable icon. The original sport-crossover. A bold design, built upon a sport sedan chassis. It has the bones and muscle of an athlete with the enhanced capability to match. 320-horsepower and a paddle shifted1 7-speed automatic transmission with Downshift Rev Matching. QX70. Make your mark. EXTERIOR DESIGN DARING IN DESIGN. ICONIC IN STYLE Disrupt the status quo with bold style that tells the world you dare. With its sports car-inspired silhouette, the INFINITI QX70 leaves an impression that’s both instantaneous and unforgettable. ATHLETIC STANCE Large 21-inch alloy wheels not only complement the muscular proportions of the QX70, they are designed to make handling more responsive. The lightweight construction inherently reduces unsprung weight and helps contribute to quicker turn-ins.1 EFFICIENT FORM The sloping roofline smooths the airflow over the QX70’s distinctive shape, resulting in a low 0.35 coefficient of drag. Efficient aerodynamics reduces turbulence for lower fuel consumption and quieter cruising. IMPRESSION AMPLIFIED Expressing signature INFINITI double-arch design, the refreshed grille features a honeycomb-patterned mesh that accentuates its sporty character. The arc of the bottom, like a natural reflection of the top, gives the QX70 a distinctive appearance.
  • Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans

    Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans

    DOT HS 809 868 June 2005 NHTSA Technical Report Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. DOT HS 809 868 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2005 Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Marie C. Walz 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation Planning, Evaluation and Budget 11. Contract or Grant No. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC 20590 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Rollover crashes kill more than 10,000 occupants of passenger vehicles each year. As part of its mission to reduce fatalities and injuries, since model year 2001 NHTSA has included rollover information as part of its NCAP ratings. One of the primary means of assessing rollover risk is the static stability factor (SSF), a measurement of a vehicle’s resistance to rollover. The higher the SSF, the lower the rollover risk.
  • Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement

    Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement

    Case 3:17-cv-03201-N Document 79 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 44 PageID 3978 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Case No. 2:15-CV-10394-LJM-SDD Plaintiff, HON. LAURIE J. MICHELSON v. NEW WORLD INTERNATIONAL JURY TRIAL DEMANDED INC., AUTO LIGHTHOUSE PLUS, LLC, and UNITED COMMERCE CENTERS, INC. Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Case 3:17-cv-03201-N Document 79 Filed 11/17/16 Page 2 of 44 PageID 3979 Plaintiff Ford Global Technologies, LLC (“FGTL”) by and through their undersigned counsel, as and for its Complaint against defendants United Commerce Centers, Inc., New World International Inc., and Auto Lighthouse Plus, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) alleges as follows: I. THE PARTIES 1. Ford Global Technologies LLC (hereinafter “FGTL”) is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Michigan, having a principal place of business at 330 Townsend Drive, Suite 800 South, Dearborn, MI 48126. 2. On information and belief, Defendant United Commerce Centers, Inc. (hereinafter “UCC”) is a Texas Corporation, with a principal place of business at 1720 E. State Highway 356, Irving, TX 75060. 3. On information and belief, UCC is doing business as New World International. 4. On information and belief, Peter Tsai is registered agent, president and treasurer of UCC and Grace Tsai is Director, Vice President and Secretary of UCC. 1 Case 3:17-cv-03201-N Document 79 Filed 11/17/16 Page 3 of 44 PageID 3980 5. On information and belief, Defendant New World International Inc.