DOCSLIB.ORG

CI Iberian Equity PORTFOLIO TYPE Climate Impact Assessment EQUITY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CI Iberian Equity PORTFOLIO TYPE Climate Impact Assessment EQUITY OVERVIEW DATE OF HOLDINGS COVERAGE 31 DEC 2019 94.03% AMOUNT INVESTED BENCHMARK USED 29,910,665 EUR Ibex 35 CI Iberian Equity PORTFOLIO TYPE Climate Impact Assessment EQUITY Carbon Metrics 1 of 3 Portfolio Overview Disclosure Emission Exposure Relative Emission Exposure Climate Performance Number/Weight tCO₂e tCO₂e/Mio EUR Revenue Weighted Avg Relative Carbon Carbon Weighted Avg Share of Disclosing Holdings Scope 1 & 2 Incl. Scope 3 Carbon Risk Rating1 Footprint Intensity Carbon Intensity Portfolio 7% / 73.2% ,24 27,424 210.0 29.41 19.14 40 Benchmark 94.3% / 9.3% ,99 34,225 300.52 340.72 25. 4 Net Performance -1.3 p.p. / -25 p.p. 30.1% 19.9% 30.1% 20.9% 3.3% — Emission Exposure Analysis Emissions Exposure (tCO₂e) Sector Contributions to Emissions2 30,000 Consumer Discretionary 8% Consumer Staples 4% 20,000 Energy 21% 10,000 Materials 65% Industrials 2% 0 Portfolio Benchmark Scope 1 Scope 2 Scope 3 1 Note: Carbon Risk Rating data is current as of the date of report generation. 2 Emissions contributions for all other portfolio sectors is less than 1% for each sector. © 2020 Institutional Shareholder Services 1 of 10 Climate Impact Assessment CI Iberian Equity Emission Exposure Analysis (continued) Top 10 Contributors to Portfolio Emissions Contribution to Portfolio Issuer Name Portfolio Weight (%) Emissions Reporting Quality Carbon Risk Rating Emission Exposure (%) Semapa Sociedade de Investimento e Gesta… 52.% 2.52% Inconsistent - Repsol SA 17.42% 3.3% Strong Medium Performer The Navigator Co. SA .9% 4.0% Moderate - Viscofan SA 4.0% 3.4% Strong Laggard Gestamp Automocion SA 3.5% 2.7% Strong Medium Performer Galp Energia SGPS SA 3.2% 2.49% Strong Laggard Vidrala SA 2.79% 7.3% Non-Reporting Medium Performer CIE Automotive SA 2.49% 3.10% Moderate - Melia Hotels International SA 1.55% 3.15% Strong - Corticeira Amorim SGPS SA 1.39% .0% Inconsistent - Total for Top 10 96.20% 40.39% Carbon Metrics 2 of 3 Emission Attribution Analysis Emission Attribution Analysis examines the extent to which higher or lower GHG exposure between the portfolio and the benchmark can be attributed to sector allocation versus issuer selection. A portfolio with a larger amount of assets allocated to an emissions-intense sector will ultimately have higher GHG emissions exposure. However, this can be offset by the selection of less emissions-intense issuers from that sector. This analysis relates to the carbon footprint of the portfolio, specifically the Emissions Scope 1 & 2 (tCO₂e) and Relative Carbon Footprint (tCO₂e/Mio Invested) metrics. The subsequent table identifies the most emissions-intense issuers in the analysis, the comparative weight for each issuer between the portfolio and benchmark, as well as the sector allocation and issuer selection effects. A positive (green) number represents less greenhouse gas exposure for the issuer in the portfolio relative to the benchmark. Top Sectors to Emission Attribution Exposure vs.Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark Sector Difference Sector Allocation Effect Issuer Selection Effect Weight Weight Communication Services 5.% 10.2% -4.9% 0.43% 0.3% Consumer Discretionary 17.01% 12.47% 4.53% -0.2% -4.77% Consumer Staples 10.21% 0.47% 9.74% -8.02% 5.32% Energy 5.5% 4.07% 1.7% -6.47% 6.75% Financials 4.% 25.11% -20.3% 0.28% 0.05% Health Care 1.2% 2.% 1.14% -0.63% 0.12% Industrials 12.14% 13.54% -1.41% 2.3% 18.49% Information Technology 3.3% .7% -3.51% 0.02% -0.08% Materials 21.95% 1.27% 20.% -407.76% 388.25% Real Estate 0% 1.97% -1.97% 0.05% 0% Utilities 0% 20.73% -20.73% 35.66% 0% Cumulative Higher (-) and Lower (+) Emission Exposure vs. Benchmark -384.34% 414.43% Higher (-) / Lower (+) Net Emission Exposure vs. Benchmark 30% © 2020 Institutional Shareholder Services 2 of 10 Climate Impact Assessment CI Iberian Equity Emission Attribution Analysis (continued) Highest Emission-Intense Issuers in Combined Portfolio & Benchmark Universe Emission Exposure Scope Issuer Name Sector Carbon Risk Rating Portfolio Under (-) / Overexposure (+) 1 & 2 (tCO₂e) 1. ArcelorMittal SA Materials 11,7.3 Medium Performer -0.58% 2. Semapa Sociedade de Investimento e Gest… Materials 4,35.51 - 2.52% 3. International Consolidated Airlines Group … Industrials 2,02.25 Medium Performer -2.83% 4. Endesa SA Utilities 1,297 Medium Performer -2.12% 5. Acerinox SA Materials 1,12.35 - -0.51% 6. Repsol SA Energy 1,09.57 Medium Performer -0.71% 7. Naturgy Energy Group SA Utilities 9.77 Outperformer -1.89% 8. Iberdrola SA Utilities 44.49 Outperformer -12.74% 9. ENCE Energia y Celulosa, SA Materials 437.3 Laggard -0.19% 10. The Navigator Co. SA Materials 301.1 - 4.8% 11. ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servici… Industrials 2.32 Medium Performer -2.03% 12. Galp Energia SGPS SA Energy 275.05 Laggard 2.49% 13. Gestamp Automocion SA Consumer Discretionary 27.1 Medium Performer 2.87% 14. Viscofan SA Consumer Staples 247.59 Laggard 3% 15. CIE Automotive SA Consumer Discretionary 1.75 - 2.67% Carbon Metrics 3 of 3 Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity Weighted Avg Greenhouse Gas Intensity Sector Contribution tCO₂e/ Mio EUR Revenue Communication Services Consumer Discretionary Consumer Staples Energy Portfolio Financials Health Care Benchmark Industrials Information Technology Materials Real Estate 0 50 100 150 200 250 Utilities Top 10 Emission Intense Companies (tCO₂e Scope 1 & 2/Revenue Millions) Issuer Name Emission Intensity Peer Group Avg Intensity 1. Semapa Sociedade de Investimento e Gestao SGPS SA 2,201.5 544. 2. Viscofan SA 9.5 142.93 3. The Navigator Co. SA 454.2 544. 4. Repsol SA 449.7 979.13 5. Vidrala SA 199.75 539.9 6. Galp Energia SGPS SA 19.09 979.13 7. CIE Automotive SA 151.42 127.07 8. Melia Hotels International SA 100.90 301. 9. Corticeira Amorim SGPS SA 4.0 277.2 10. Gestamp Automocion SA 77.15 127.07 © 2020 Institutional Shareholder Services 3 of 10 Climate Impact Assessment CI Iberian Equity Climate Scenario Analysis 1 of 2 In order to transition, holdings need to commit to align with the international climate goals and progress on those in the future. Currently, 14.69% of the portfolio’s value is committed to such a goal. While this is not a guarantee to reach this goal, the currently 26.78% of the portfolio without a goal is certainly unlikely to transition and should receive special attention from a climate risk conscious investor. Portfolio Compliance with Emission Budget per Scenario 2019 2020 2030 2040 2050 Until the year 2019, portfolio is aligned with a 2° Celsius warming scenario. 2° 143.17% 144.1% 17% 215.1% 21.4% 2019 4° 131.% 131.59% 12.05% 125.% 12.1% 6° 129.0% 12.51% 120.97% 114.95% 112.01% Climate Strategy Assessment (% Portfolio Weight) 45% 43% 40% 37% Portfolio 30% 27% 22% 20% 15% Benchmark 10% 5% 4% 2% 0% 0% No Strategy Weak Strategy Moderate Strategy Robust Strategy 2ºC - Committment Scenario Analysis The climate scenario environment alignment compares current and future portfolio greenhouse gas emissions with the carbon budgets for a below 2 degree Celsius scenario as well as warming scenarios of 4 degrees and 6 degrees Celsius until 2050. The CI Iberian Equity strategy in its current state will be misaligned with a 2 degree Celsius scenario by 2019. Only by re-allocating investments or by helping holdings to transition, a longer-lasting 2 degree alignment can be achieved. Portfolio Emission Pathway vs. Climate Scenarios 5 ) e 4 ₂ O C t ( s 3 d n a s u o h 2 T 1 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 202 2027 202 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 203 2037 203 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 204 2047 204 2049 2050 Emission Budget 6°C Emission Budget 4°C Emission Budget 2°C Portfolio Emissions © 2020 Institutional Shareholder Services 4 of 10 Climate Impact Assessment CI Iberian Equity Climate Scenario Analysis 2 of 2 To contain average global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius, portfolio holdings in certain sectors are still aligned (-), while others are already beyond (+) the emission budget for a 2 degrees Celsius pathway. Portfolio Emissions vs. Emission Budget per Sector - Under (-)/Outperformance (+) of the 2°C Scenario Requirements 1.8 1.6 2019 1.6 1.5 1.4 2030 1.2 1.2 ) 2050 e 1.2 ₂ 1 1 O C t 1 ( d n 0.80 a s u o 0.60 h T 0.40 0.24 0.19 0.20 0.16 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.01 0.03 0 -0.03 -0.02 -0.03 -0.07 -0.20 Paper & Related Integrated Oil & Gas Food Products Auto Parts Business Support Containers Products Services Metal/Glass Sector Emissions vs. 2°C Emission Budget for 2019 Sector Emissions vs. 2°C Emission Budget for 2050 2.7 2.8 3 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.6 ) 2.2 ) 2.4 e e ₂ 2 ₂ 2.2 O O C 1.7 C 2 1.7 t 1.8 t ( ( 1.8 d 1.6 d 1.6 n 1.4 1.3 n a a 1.4 s 1.2 s 1.2 u u 1.2 o 1 o h h 1 T 0.80 T 0.80 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.40 0.22 0.25 0.11 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.09 0.20 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.20 0.01 0.07 0.02 0 0 Paper & Integrated Food Auto Parts Business Containers Paper & Integrated Food Auto Parts Business Containers Related Oil & Gas Products Support Metal/Glass Related Oil & Gas Products Support Metal/Glass Products Services Products Services Emission Budget Percentage of Holdings 2°C Aligned in 2019, 2030, and 2050 100% 100% 2019 80% 2030 60% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 2050 40% 25% 25% 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Paper & Related Integrated Oil & Gas Food Products Auto Parts Business Support Containers Products Services Metal/Glass © 2020 Institutional Shareholder Services 5 of 10 Climate Impact Assessment CI Iberian Equity Physical Climate Risk Analysis Rising temperature levels, even if limited to 2° Celsius, will result in changes of the climate system resulting in physical risks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Análisis Carteras Modelo Españolas
    4-jul-14 Análisis Carteras modelo españolas La siguiente tabla ofrece la evolución de las carteras modelo Evol. C.M. 20-Ibex35 (ene.'96/jul.'14) comparadas con el Ibex 35 del 3-jun-14 al 2-jul-14: 1000% Var. Mes Var. Año Dif año Ibex35 800% CARTERA 20 VALORES Ibex35 C.Mod. Ampliada 2,9% 9,2% 1,7% C.Mod. Media 3,6% 9,1% 1,6% 600% C.Mod. Simplificada 4,2% 10,8% 3,4% 400% IBEX 35 2,2% 7,4% n/a 200% Las tablas siguientes muestran la evolución de los valores que integran las carteras modelo españolas durante el pasado mes: 0% Cartera modelo ampliada 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 junio julio CM 20 valores: Cambios julio C. ampliada Peso % Rbd. x div C. ampliada Peso Beta Rbd. x div Entran Salen Cambian Peso (1) (1) Telefonica 6 Var.Mes2,87% 5,9% Telefonica 6 0,91 5,9% Acerinox +4 DIA -4 Santander +2 Santander 5 2,83% 7,7% Santander 7 1,204 7,8% Tubos R. -1 NH Hoteles 3 -1,24% 0,0% NH Hoteles 3 1,026 0,0% BBVA +2 ACS 3 2,01% 3,6% ACS 3 1,093 3,6% Técnicas R. -2 Tubos Reunidos 5 4,96% 0,7% Tubos Reunidos 4 1,323 0,7% Amadeus -3 BBVA 5 1,22% 3,6% BBVA 7 1,319 3,6% Tubacex -1 Cie Automotive -1 DIA 4 6,38% 2,3% Acerinox 4 1,343 3,5% Red Eléctrica +1 Iberdrola +3 Técnicas Reunidas 4 0,99% 3,1% Técnicas Reunidas 2 0,518 3,1% CM 20 valores vs Ibex en 2014 BME 7 5,15% 4,6% BME 7 1,096 4,7% 10% Ferrovial 6 1,80% 3,6% Ferrovial 6 0,76 3,6% 5% CaixaBank 7 2,34% 4,3% CaixaBank 7 1,194 4,3% Grifols 7 2,53% 0,5% Grifols 7 0,929 0,5% 0% Gamesa 4 2,34% 0,0% Gamesa 4 1,15 0,0% -5% Abertis 2 5,72% 3,6% Abertis 2 0,84 3,7% Cartera Ibex35 Amadeus 7 -2,32% 2,1% Amadeus 4 0,596 2,1% -10% 14 14 14 14 14 14 - - - - - - j Enagas 6 8,43% 5,7% Enagas 6 0,467 5,7% f e a m m CIE Automotive SA 6 11,15% 1,7% CIE Automotive SA 5 0,033 1,7% Iberdrola 2 5,82% 2,9% Iberdrola 5 0,714 2,9% CM 10 valores: Cambios julio Tubacex 6 -6,19% 0,6% Tubacex 5 1,136 0,6% Entran Salen Cambian Peso Red Electrica 5 4,21% 4,0% Red Electrica 6 0,69 4,0% BBVA +11 Amadeus -11 Red Eléctrica +1 100 3,11% 100 3,37% Iberdrolda +11 Tubos R.
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositiva 1
    Análisis de la presencia vasca en el ranking EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (2004-2009) Informe Noviembre2009 0 Comentario al documento La Comisión europea acaba de publicar la última edición del EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (2009) con un ranking de las 1.000 empresas europeas con mayor inversión en I+D. Este año, hay 21 empresas españolas en el ranking, con una inversión total de 1460 millones de euros. Como es habitual en este ranking, Telefónica lidera el grupo de empresas españolas desde el puesto 40 con una inversión que este año alcanza los 668 millones de euros. Entre las mil empresas que más invierten en I+D este año aparecen 7 empresas vascas: Iberdrola, Fagor, ITP, Gamesa, Cie Automotive, Faes Farma y CAF (que había desaparecido en años anteriores y ha vuelto a aparecer este año). Entre todas ellas suman una inversión total de 239 millones de euros, mejorando sensiblemente los 190 millones de euros de inversión total que aparecían en el ranking para el año anterior. Además, la evolución de la participación de las empresas vascas en este ranking desde el 2003 también es muy positiva, tanto en términos de inversión creciente como en cuanto al porcentaje de inversión de las empresas vascas sobre las empresas españolas. Hemos pasado de 2 empresas en 2003 con una inversión de apenas 80 millones de euros a 7 empresas con una inversión tres veces mayor y un porcentaje sobre el total del Estado sensiblemente superior (16.35%). Naider, noviembre 2009 Pág. 2 1 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2004 2 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2005 3 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2006 4 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2007 5 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2008 6 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2009 7 RESUMEN EUSKADI Pág.
    [Show full text]
  • First Semester 2018
    CIE Automotive pg. 1 CIE Automotive is 2018 included in Ibex 35 News pg. 3 CIE Lt Forge has launched a 33 second crankshaft production line First semester pg. 8 The I CSR Conference in Brazil pg. 9 Managing high value added processes www.cieautomotive.com CIE Automotive pg. 2 2018, a great year Dear friends, improve, we take them. In the general shareholders' meeting held in April, we announced a new improvement in the objectives for With half of the financial year already through, we can state that 2020 with the conviction that we will continue to perform better 2018 has been a great year so far. In June CIE Automotive stock than the world automotive market. And as we grow, we are was included in the Ibex-35, the principal benchmark index of maintaining a solid, healthy balance sheet, which reinforces our the Spanish stock market. This credibility for investors, customers made us the only representative and shareholders. of the automotive industry in a group with listed companies On our way as a leading company that lead their sectors. This in the automotive sector, our also places us as the fourth business growth has remained in Basque company of the index, step with our commitment to the one more reason to be proud. environment. Thus, in May we The addition to the Ibex-35 is joined the Social Impact Cluster, not only a chance to greatly coordinated by Forética. This increase the visibility of CIE platform, that already includes Automotive on the markets. It 60 large companies, promotes is, above all, further recognition initiatives to understand, evaluate, of the good performance we measure and improve our impact on have achieved in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis Carteras Modelo Españolas
    5-jun-14 Análisis Carteras modelo españolas La siguiente tabla ofrece la evolución de las carteras modelo Evol. C.M. 20-Ibex35 (ene.'96/jun.'14) comparadas con el Ibex 35 del 5-may-14 al 3-jun-14: 1000% Var. Mes Var. Año Dif año Ibex35 800% CARTERA 20 VALORES Ibex35 C.Mod. Ampliada 2,1% 6,1% 1,0% C.Mod. Media 0,6% 5,3% 0,2% 600% C.Mod. Simplificada 0,4% 6,4% 1,3% 400% IBEX 35 2,9% 5,1% n/a 200% Las tablas siguientes muestran la evolución de los valores que integran las carteras modelo españolas durante el pasado mes: 0% Cartera modelo ampliada 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 mayo junio CM 20 valores: Cambios junio C. ampliada Peso % Rbd. x div C. ampliada Peso Beta Rbd. x div Entran Salen Cambian Peso (1) (1) Telefonica 8 Var.Mes-0,53% 6,2% Telefonica 6 0,931 6,1% DIA +3 Jazztel -3 Telefónica -2 Santander 5 4,99% 8,1% Santander 5 1,173 7,9% Téc.Reunidas -2 NH Hoteles 5 -7,39% 0,0% NH Hoteles 3 0,698 0,0% NH Hoteles -2 ACS 3 5,02% 3,5% ACS 3 0,86 3,5% Gamesa +1 Tubos Reunidos 3 6,14% 0,7% Tubos Reunidos 5 0,807 0,7% Tubacex +1 BBVA 5 6,29% 3,9% BBVA 5 1,137 3,8% Amadeus +2 Jazztel 6 -6,36% 0,0% DIA 4 0,78 0,0% Tb.
    [Show full text]
  • Asuntos Que Se Someten a La Aprobación Del Consejo
    Number: C-DF- 25/2019 Segment: Financial Derivatives Date: 24 June 2019 Circular Effective Date: 26 June 2019 Replaces: C-DF-20/2019 Subject Margin Calculation Parameters. In accordance with the provisions of the Article regarding “Margins required by BME CLEARING” of BME CLEARING’s Summary Rule Book, this Circular establishes the Margin Calculation Parameters. 1.- CONSTRUCTION OF VALUATION ARRAYS Total Percentage Extraordinary Fluctuation Increase and Margin Class Product Margin to be Decrease of Fluctuation analyzed Volatility 002 BONO 10 600 b.p. 480 b.p. 10% 021 IBEX 35, MINI IBEX 35 & MICRO IBEX 35 800 points 640 points 38% 0S1 IBEX 35 BANKS 11% 9% 10% 0S2 IBEX 35 ENERGY 8% 6% 10% 023 BBVA 11% 9% 29% 025 ENDESA 8% 6% 42% 027 IBERDROLA 8% 6% 32% 028 SANTANDER 11% 9% 30% 030 REPSOL 9% 7% 30% 031 TELEFÓNICA 8% 6% 26% 033 ACERINOX 12% 10% 27% 035 BANKINTER 10% 8% 34% 037 NATURGY 9% 7% 32% 038 INDRA 11% 9% 37% 041 AMADEUS 10% 8% 29% 043 INDITEX 10% 8% 28% 045 ACS 10% 8% 47% 046 BANCO SABADELL 13% 10% 33% 047 G FERROVIAL 9% 7% 31% 048 ACCIONA 9% 7% 29% 050 SACYR VALLEH. 13% 10% 41% 051 FCC 12% 10% 50% 052 ENAGAS 8% 6% 41% 053 REE 8% 6% 26% 054 SIEMENS GAMESA 16% 13% 29% 056 MEDIASET 13% 10% 43% 057 CORP. MAPFRE 10% 8% 44% 1/9 Total Percentage Extraordinary Fluctuation Increase and Margin Class Product Margin to be Decrease of Fluctuation analyzed Volatility 058 ATRESMEDIA 14% 11% 32% 066 COLONIAL 10% 8% 30% 067 BME 8% 6% 39% 068 GRIFOLS 10% 8% 28% 072 ARCELOR MITTAL 14% 11% 22% 073 TEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Prohibition of Short Selling
    11/13/2020 Temporary prohibition of short selling Temporary prohibition of short selling The FCA notifies that it temporarily prohibits short selling in the following instruments under Articles 23 (1) and 26 (4) of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012. This follows a decision made by another EU Competent Authority. Details of the Financial Instruments concerned: • ABENGOA CLASE B (ISIN: ES0105200002) • ACCIONA, S.A. (ISIN: ES0125220311) • ACCIONES FOMENTO DE (ISIN: ES0122060314) • ACCIONES IBERDROLA (ISIN: ES0144580Y14) • ACERINOX, S.A. (ISIN: ES0132105018) • ACS,ACTIVIDADES DE CO (ISIN: ES0167050915) • AEDAS HOMES, S.A (ISIN: ES0105287009) • AENA, S.M.E., S.A. (ISIN: ES0105046009) • AIRBUS (ISIN:NL0000235190) • AMADEUS IT GROUP, S.A. (ISIN: ES0109067019) • APERAM (ISIN: LU0569974404) • APPLUS SERVICES, S.A. (ISIN: ES0105022000) • ARCELORMITTAL SA (ISIN: LU1598757687) • ATRESMEDIA CORPORAC (ISIN: ES0109427734) • AUDAX RENOVABLES, S.A (ISIN: ES0136463017) • BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA (ISIN: ES0113211835) • BANCO DE SABADELL (ISIN: ES0113860A34) • BANCO SANTANDER S.A. (ISIN: ES0113900J37) • BANKIA, S.A. (ISIN: ES0113307062) • BANKINTER, S.A. (ISIN: ES0113679I37) • BIOSEARCH, S.A. (ISIN: ES0172233118) • CAIXABANK, S.A. (ISIN: ES0140609019) • CELLNEX TELECOM, S.A. (ISIN: ES0105066007 • CIE AUTOMOTIVE, S.A. (ISIN: ES0105630315) https://www.fca.org.uk/news/news-stories/temporary-prohibition-short-selling/printable/print 1/5 11/13/2020 Temporary prohibition of short selling • COCA-COLA EUROPEAN P (ISIN: GB00BDCPN049) • CODERE S.A. (ISIN: ES0119256032) • COMPAÑIA DE DISTRIBUC (ISIN: ES0105027009) • CONSTRUCCIONES Y AUX (ISIN: ES0121975009) • ENAGAS,S.A. (ISIN: ES0130960018) • ENCE ENERGIA Y CELULO (ISIN: ES0130625512) • ENDESA,S.A. (ISIN: ES0130670112) • ERCROS (ISIN: ES0125140A14) • EUSKALTEL, S.A. (ISIN: ES0105075008) • FAES FARMA, S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • FACTSHEET - AS of 23-Sep-2021 Solactive Spain 40 Price Return Index
    FACTSHEET - AS OF 23-Sep-2021 Solactive Spain 40 Price Return Index HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 Jan-2010 Jan-2012 Jan-2014 Jan-2016 Jan-2018 Jan-2020 Solactive Spain 40 Price Return Index CHARACTERISTICS ISIN / WKN DE000SLA24C0 / SLA24B Base Value / Base Date 100 Points / 18.12.2009 Bloomberg / Reuters SOLSP40P Index / .SOLSP40P Last Price 115.98 Index Calculator Solactive AG Dividends Not included (Price index) Index Type Developed Markets Calculation 09:00am to 10:30pm (CET), every 15 seconds Index Currency EUR History Available daily back to 18.12.2009 Index Members 40 FACTSHEET - AS OF 23-Sep-2021 Solactive Spain 40 Price Return Index STATISTICS 30D 90D 180D 360D YTD Since Inception Performance -1.56% -2.33% 6.64% 40.27% 12.92% 15.98% Performance (p.a.) - - - - - 1.27% Volatility (p.a.) 14.16% 15.53% 14.74% 19.65% 15.84% 23.02% High 118.32 118.74 120.31 120.31 120.31 123.40 Low 112.94 109.11 108.51 78.99 98.33 57.78 Sharpe Ratio -1.19 -0.55 0.98 2.11 1.18 0.08 Max. Drawdown -4.54% -8.11% -9.31% -9.31% -9.31% -45.37% VaR 95 \ 99 -27.4% \ -44.5% -35.7% \ -62.7% CVaR 95 \ 99 -36.7% \ -48.5% -54.7% \ -91.5% COMPOSITION BY CURRENCIES COMPOSITION BY COUNTRIES ES 96.1% EUR 100.0% LU 3.9% TOP COMPONENTS AS OF 23-Sep-2021 Company Ticker Country Currency Index Weight (%) IBERDROLA SA IBE SQ Equity ES EUR 13.67% BANCO SANTANDER SA SAN SQ Equity ES EUR 12.81% BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA SA BBVA SQ Equity ES EUR 8.97% INDUSTRIA DE DISENO TEXTIL SA ITX SQ Equity ES EUR 8.60% CELLNEX TELECOM SA CLNX SQ Equity ES EUR 8.31% AMADEUS
    [Show full text]
  • Liquidity Provider Program in Physical Delivery Stock Futures
    Number: I-EX-DF-08/2021 Contract Group: Financial Derivatives Date: 13 January 2021 Instruction Effective Date: 19 January 2021 Replaces: I-EX-DF-01/2020 Subject Liquidity Provider Program in Physical Delivery Stock Futures. Minimum requirements to meet to be considered Liquidity Summary Provider for Stock Futures Settled by Delivery. It is modified due to new underlying incorporation This Instruction is published to develop the established on Circular C-EX-DF-23/2019 or any Circular which may replace it. ASSOCIATED BENEFIT TO LIQUIDITY PROVIDER PROGRAM ON STOCK FUTURES SETTLED BY DELIVERY Associated benefit to the fulfilment of the minimum requirements will be that the fee per contract paid to MEFF and BME CLEARING of every traded contract on the Member prop account on every underlying, will be of 10 cents per contract except for those contracts where maximum per transaction has been already applied. Furthermore, no minimum per transaction will be applied. Fee per contract for every contract will have a progressive reduction depending on the daily average number of credits obtained by the Member during the control period according to the following table. Fee will be applied to every contract of (traded by property account) the period and in all underlyings, even those that have not been quoted. Credits. Daily Average Fee Up to 49.440 0,100 From 49.441 to 96.055 0,090 From 96.056 to 119.363 0,085 From119.364 to 142.671 0,080 From 142.672 to 165.978 0,075 From 165.979 to 189.286 0,070 From 189.287 to 235.900 0,060 From 235.901 to 282.515 0,050 From 282.516 to 329.130 0,040 From 329.131 to 375.743 0,030 375.744 or more 0,020 1/4 MINIMUM QUOTING CONDITIONS AND DEGREE OF FULFILLLMENT MEASUREMENT a) Each Member will quote at least a minimum of 10 single stock futures.
    [Show full text]
  • STOXX SPAIN 30 Selection List
    STOXX SPAIN 30 Last Updated: 20201001 ISIN Sedol RIC Int.Key Company Name Country Currency Component FF Mcap (BEUR) Rank (FINAL)Rank (PREVIOUS) ES0144580Y14 B288C92 IBE.MC 442464 IBERDROLA ES EUR Y 60.9 1 1 ES0113900J37 5705946 SAN.MC 407228 BCO SANTANDER ES EUR Y 26.6 2 2 ES0148396007 BP9DL90 ITX.MC 711131 Industria de Diseno Textil SA ES EUR Y 26.5 3 3 ES0109067019 B3MSM28 AMA.MC ES0017 AMADEUS IT GROUP ES EUR Y 21.4 4 4 ES0105066007 BX90C05 CLNX.MC ES502D CELLNEX TELECOM ES EUR Y 18.5 5 5 ES0113211835 5501906 BBVA.MC 550190 BCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIAES EUR Y 15.8 6 6 ES0178430E18 5732524 TEF.MC 488082 TELEFONICA ES EUR Y 14.8 7 7 ES0118900010 B038516 FER.MC B03851 FERROVIAL ES EUR Y 11.1 8 8 ES0105046009 BVRZ8L1 AENA.MC ES504F AENA SME ES EUR Y 8.8 9 10 ES0173516115 5669354 REP.MC 473322 REPSOL ES EUR Y 8.6 10 9 ES0171996087 BYY3DX6 GRLS.MC B01SPF GRIFOLS ES EUR Y 7.2 11 13 ES0130670112 5271782 ELE.MC 431536 ENDESA ES EUR Y 7.2 12 11 ES0173093024 BD6FXN3 REE.MC 672716 RED ELECTRICA CORPORATION ES EUR Y 6.9 13 12 ES0140609019 B283W97 CABK.MC EE009 CAIXABANK ES EUR Y 6.5 14 14 ES0116870314 5650422 NTGY.MC 417986 Naturgy Energy Group ES EUR Y 5.9 15 15 ES0143416115 B01CP21 SGREN.MC 462338 SIEMENS GAMESA ES EUR Y 5.2 16 16 ES0167050915 B01FLQ6 ACS.MC 533338 ACS ES EUR Y 4.7 17 17 ES0130960018 7383072 ENAG.MC 738307 ENAGAS ES EUR Y 4.6 18 18 ES0105025003 BNGNB77 MRL.MC ES403D MERLIN PROPERTIES SOCIMI ES EUR Y 2.6 19 20 ES0184696104 BH3SX44 MASM.MC ES803H MASMOVIL IBERCOM ES EUR Y 2.4 20 21 ES0113679I37 5474008 BKT.MC 407141 BANKINTER ES EUR Y 2.4 21 19 ES0184262212 5638280 VIS.MC 563828 VISCOFAN ES EUR Y 2.2 22 22 ES0183746314 5466726 VID.MC ES406G VIDRALA ES EUR Y 2 23 25 ES0125220311 5579107 ANA.MC 423932 ACCIONA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ibex 35, Revisión Del 7-Junio: BME O CIE Automotive Ocuparán La Plaza De Abertis Martes, 8 De Mayo De 2018
    BC% Nota de Análisis Ibex 35, revisión del 7-junio: BME o CIE Automotive ocuparán la plaza de Abertis Martes, 8 de mayo de 2018 A partir de mañana 9 de mayo el Ibex cotizará con 34 valores tras la salida de Abertis , una vez concluido el plazo de aceptación de su OPA. No será hasta el 7 de junio cuando el Comité Técnico Asesor del Ibex en reunión ordinaria decida quién entra en su lugar . Si tomamos los volúmenes negociados en los últimos seis meses, los valores mejor posicionados para ocupar el puesto que deja Abertis serían BME y Cie Automotive. Ambas tienen volúmenes similares, aunque a favor de BME está su mayor free-float. Aunque hay otros valores con mayor volumen negociado en el mismo periodo (OHL, Sacyr, Ence y NH Hoteles), ninguno de ellos cumple con el criterio mínimo de ponderación (0,3% de capitalización bursátil promedio del Ibex en últimos 6 meses). Volumen Cumple criterio Cumple período acum ulado Ponderación minimo minimo (1/3 del últimos 6 Miembro promedio 6 ponderación período de Valor m eses (mln €) del IBEX meses (0,3%) cómputo) 1 BANCO SANTANDER 24.415 SI 13,97% SI SI 2 BBVA 14.020 SI 7,19% SI SI 3 TELEFONICA 13.638 SI 6,71% SI SI 4 INDITEX 11.059 SI 8,00% SI SI 5 IBERDROLA SA 10.478 SI 6,35% SI SI 6 REPSOL SA 8.555 SI 3,65% SI SI 7 CAIXABANK S.A 6.005 SI 3,73% SI SI 8 ABERTIS 5.338 SI 2,89% SI SI 9 AMADEUS IT GROUP 4.951 SI 4,21% SI SI 10 BANCO SABADELL 3.566 SI 1,49% SI SI 11 ENDESA 3.270 SI 1,21% SI SI 12 GAS NATURAL SDG 3.225 SI 1,83% SI SI 13 BANKIA SA 2.969 SI 1,09% SI SI 14 ENAGAS SA 2.816 SI 0,86% SI SI 15
    [Show full text]
  • Cie News N.35 First Semester 2019
    CIE NEWS N.35 FIRST SEMESTER 2019 CIE ACQUIRES CIE REINFORCES AURANGABAD ITS MACHINING ELECTRICALS CAPACITY IN LIMITED MEXICO OUR COMMITMENT INTERVIEW TO SDG AITOR ZAZPE MANAGING HIGH VALUE ADDED PROCESSES 1 WITH OUR GOALS ACHIEVED, WE’RE LOOKING FOR NEW SUMMITS Dear colleagues, So far, this year, we have witnessed circumstantial And, all of this, without losing sight of our drive to grow, a elements that brought with them significant uncertainties for the constant feature in the history of the company which, in March, took international financial markets and, in particular, the automotive a new step with the acquisition of Aurangabad Electricals Limited sector. The Trump Administration advances with its protectionist (AEL). This operation, carried out through Mahindra CIE, reaffirms our policies and commercial war trumpets are sounding between the diversification by extending CIE’s operational model into a market, the United States and China; the Brexit labyrinth still hasn’t found a way Indian one, which we emerged into a relatively short time ago and with out; pressure is increasing in several western countries to replace a technology, aluminium, that was lacking in Asia. diesel engines with other alternatives… on the whole, a changeable and utterly complex environment. Instead of being intimidated, at AEL, which has over 3,300 employees, is a key supplier CIE Automotive we grow with challenges and, thanks to our for passenger and two-wheeler vehicle manufacturers and a clear diversification policy and our business model, in 2019, we will meet the example of how, at CIE Automotive, we will make the most of the objectives of the 2016-2020 Strategic Plan one year ahead of schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 All-Europe Executive Team Results Are Based on Votes from 691 Portfolio Managers and Buy-Side Analysts, and 491 Sell-Side Analysts
    R +R 2020 All-Europe Executive Team Results are based on votes from 691 portfolio managers and buy-side analysts, and 491 sell-side analysts. For Best Investor Program, companies were evaluated on 8 performance attributes: (1) Consistency, (2) Granularity, (3) Timing to market, (4) Authority & credibility, (5) Business & Market Knowledge, (6) Conference calls, (7) Productivity of NDR/RD Shows/ Conferences, and (8) Responsiveness. AEROSPACE & DEFENSE OVERALL BUY-SIDE SELL-SIDE RANK BEST INVESTOR RELATIONS PROGRAM RANK BEST INVESTOR RELATIONS PROGRAM RANK BEST INVESTOR RELATIONS PROGRAM 1 Airbus 1 Airbus 1 Rheinmetall 2 Safran 2 Safran 2 Airbus 3 MTU Aero Engines 3 MTU Aero Engines 3 MTU Aero Engines RANK BEST CEO RANK BEST CEO RANK BEST CEO 1 Guillaume Faury, Airbus 1 Guillaume Faury, Airbus – – 2 Philippe Petitcolin, Safran 2 Philippe Petitcolin, Safran – – 3 Reiner Winkler, MTU Aero Engines – – – – RANK BEST CFO RANK BEST CFO RANK BEST CFO 1 Dominik Asam, Airbus 1 Dominik Asam, Airbus – – 2 Bernard Delpit, Safran 2 Bernard Delpit, Safran – – 3 Peter Kameritsch, MTU Aero Engines 3 Peter Kameritsch, MTU Aero Engines – – RANK BEST IR PROFESSIONALS RANK BEST IR PROFESSIONALS RANK BEST IR PROFESSIONALS 1 Mohamed Denden, Airbus* 1 Mohamed Denden, Airbus 1 Martin Cooper, BAE Systems Martin Cooper, BAE Systems* – – 2 Cecilia Matissart, Safran – – 3 Thorsten Fischer, Airbus 3 Thorsten Fischer, Airbus – – RANK BEST IR TEAM RANK BEST IR TEAM RANK BEST IR TEAM 1 Airbus 1 Airbus – – 2 BAE Systems 2 Safran – – 3 Safran – – – – RANK BEST INVESTOR DAYS RANK BEST INVESTOR DAYS RANK BEST INVESTOR DAYS 1 Airbus 1 Airbus 1 MTU Aero Engines* Rheinmetall* 2 MTU Aero Engines 2 Safran – – 3 Safran 3 MTU Aero Engines 3 Airbus RANK BEST ESG RANK BEST ESG RANK BEST ESG 1 Airbus 1 Airbus 1 Airbus 2 Safran 2 Safran – – 3 MTU Aero Engines 3 MTU Aero Engines – – 18 Aerospace & Defense companies nominated Not ranked in the top three? Contact II to get your rankings for each category.
    [Show full text]