DOCSLIB.ORG

Baseline Survey WFP Nepal Country Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baseline Survey WFP Nepal Country Programme Terms of Reference DECENTRALIZED ENDTERM EVALUATION: Protracted Relief & Rehabilitation Operation (PRRO) 200875 in Earthquake Affected Districts WFP Nepal Country Office 2018 1 | P a g e Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Reasons for the Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Rationale: ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Objectives...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3. Stakeholders and Users of the evaluation findings ........................................................................... 6 3. Context and Subject of the Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 6 3.1. Context ............................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2. Subject of the evaluation .............................................................................................................. 8 Objectives of the programme: .................................................................................................................. 8 4. Evaluation Approach ............................................................................................................................... 11 4.1. Scope of Work: .................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.2. Evaluation Criteria and Questions ................................................................................................... 11 4.3. Evaluation Methodology .................................................................................................................. 11 4.4. Quality Assurance ............................................................................................................................ 14 5. Phases and Deliverables of the evaluation ............................................................................................. 15 6. Organization of the Evaluation ............................................................................................................... 15 6.1. Evaluation Conduct .......................................................................................................................... 15 6.2. Team composition and competencies ............................................................................................. 16 7. Security Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 18 8. Roles and Responsibilities of Stakeholders ......................................................................................... 18 9. Communication and Budget ............................................................................................................... 18 Annex-I EQ PRRO phase wise interventions: .............................................................................................. 19 Annex II: Map of EQ PRRO .......................................................................................................................... 22 Annex III: Preliminary Stakeholders analysis .............................................................................................. 23 Annex IV: Structure of the EQ PRRO- WFP ................................................................................................. 25 Annex V: Logical Framework of the programme ........................................................................................ 26 Annex VI: Evaluation Criteria and Questions .............................................................................................. 31 Annex VII: WFP Directive on Information Disclosure ................................................................................. 32 2 | P a g e Annex VIII: End line Evaluation- Key Dates ................................................................................................. 32 Annex IX: Indicative summary of PRRO areas- Asset Livelihood............................................................... 34 Annex X: Content guide for the inception package ................................................................................... 36 Annex XI: Membership of the Evaluation Reference Group and Internal Evaluation Committee ........... 36 Annex XII: Potential risks and proposed mitigation measures ................................................................... 36 Annex XIV: UNEG Ethical Guidelines ........................................................................................................... 37 Annex XV: Evaluation Report- Checklist...................................................................................................... 37 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................... 37 3 | P a g e 1. Introduction 1. The total damage and losses of the 2015 April and May earthquakes are estimated at USD 7 billion, a third of Nepal’s gross domestic product (GDP). The death toll was over 9,000. Women and marginal groups in the poorest districts have suffered the most damage and loss, yet their capacities drive community resilience,1 and women’s dominance in the agricultural and informal sectors give them an important role in recovery. WFP focuses on equitable economic growth for women and marginal groups because post-disaster recovery will only be sustainable if gender equality and social inclusion are achieved. 2. The Government’s May 2015 post-disaster needs assessment showed that reconstruction costs would exceed USD 6.7 billion. The Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) emphasized the importance of building resilience and integrating disaster risk reduction into recovery activities. The Government’s livelihood-recovery strategy in earthquake- affected areas highlights the importance of linking immediate assistance with long-term livelihood recovery. The Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development, WFP’s main government counterpart, had asked WFP to support food security and recovery through cash assistance whenever feasible. 3. WFP’s long-term recovery strategy aims to support the reconstruction priorities identified in the Government of Nepal’s PDNA and Post Disaster Recovery Framework (PDRF), across the community infrastructure, agriculture, nutrition, tourism and disaster risk reduction sectors and cross-cutting themes. The project supported 2 million food-insecure people across the worst-affected districts. 4. A protracted relief and recovery operation (PRRO 200875) supports local communities and the Government to “build back better” in the most food-insecure, earthquake-affected communities. WFP provides food assistance for assets to build or rehabilitate infrastructure such as rural roads, bridges and water systems. WFP also provided a treatment of moderate acute malnutrition programme to pregnant and lactating women and children aged 6–59 months. 5. The Government and other stakeholders enabled beneficiaries in the poorest and most vulnerable districts to plan, build and maintain community infrastructures for resilient livelihoods. WFP’s community-led planning approach was focused on the participation of women, elderly people and marginal groups in decision-making. Food assistance for assets (FFA) activity helped them to be benefited to the poorest and most food-insecure households. Market analyses provided information on accessibility, availability and prices to inform the selection of appropriate transfer modalities. 1 National Planning Commission of Nepal. 2015. Nepal Earthquake 2015 Post-Disaster Needs Assessment. Kathmandu. 4 | P a g e 2. Reasons for the Evaluation 2.1. Rationale: 6. This evaluation aims to evaluate the end of the project results or changes seen in the lives of the beneficiaries as a result of the programme implementation. It is believed that the findings of the study will have solid evidences of impact of the project interventions on food security, livelihoods, health, nutrition and productive assets. The study also provides an opportunity to learn and replicate the good practices of the project and also identifying the areas of improvement to contribute to designing a more effective programme for the future. 7. The purpose of the evaluation is to study the results gained from the EQ PRRO (2016- 2018) to compare against the target set at the planning phase of the project. For this, the end-line survey will also collect outcome indicator data and assess whether or not the project has succeeded in achieving the project goal. The evaluation results will also be used for a trend analysis of the key performance indicators over time specifically taking reference from baseline and outcome results; and evaluate them under the evaluation criteria of effectiveness, relevance, efficiency, sustainability and impact. 8. Another purpose is, the information generated by the evaluation will be used to provide information needed to assess the extent to which observed impacts justify the investment and future investments
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 84°45'0"E 84°50'0"E 84°55'0"E 85°0'0"E 85°5'0"E 85°10'0"E 85°15'0"E N " 0 ' 5 5 T 4 ° 8 1 2 C 0 I 2
    84°15'0"E 84°20'0"E 84°25'0"E 84°30'0"E 84°35'0"E 84°40'0"E 84°45'0"E 84°50'0"E 84°55'0"E 85°0'0"E 85°5'0"E 85°10'0"E 85°15'0"E N " 0 ' 5 5 t 4 ° 8 1 2 c 0 i 2 r r 9 t e C H I N A b Larkya Pass N " s 0 ' (Closed due to snowfall) ) 0 ( 4 ° i ª Dharmasal 8 m 2 e M a n a n g Samdo 7 Napche D c Nimyang Kharka Bhimtang 8 Samagaun e Kharka Bhanjo Kharka 9 5 8 D 6 a Lakpa Kharka Samagau 6 N 4 Karche Gumba 5 Mugumba " 0 h Yak Kharka Marup ' Nin 5 3 - (sangure) Samagaun 4 Shyala Lhogaun ° gaun kharka 8 Goa Gumdan 9 Chhekampar 2 k Sipgaun Lukan 1 ) Mungsangbu 9 Shyogaun Ligaun 4 Rejed Hising 7 8 3 2 Gumba 7 Limi Chumga Kharka r y Baibhuk Banjam Linlin 6 Kharka 8 Hinnanggau Wanche t Nile Yonje Kharka Namrung Chhak Serang Kharka 7 i Tiliche -thanka Syarang 6 Chhule o 4 l Dharapani Namla Ghap Penjetun 1 Kwak 5 i Lho Gapsya 7 Mursm Kharka Thonje Prok Prok Bandrung Chhekampar Phurbe 7 b 3 8 5 4 G Bur 6 Pajed Kharka Chunchet Yengechhe Lar N 4 " i 8 5 6 0 3 2 1 ' Rip 0 Kuiya 5 3 s 2 2 Gumba 1 Nakyu ° Rana Chhokun 8 Bihi Taule 2 s Yarju Chhogu - Chumchet 4 1 Durjung Chhunger 3 e Tanju 2 9 Dyang 9 Kharka Chumling c 3 Taule 9 Ripche Tumje l Pewa c Tharun Gumba 6 Nyak A a Gaun 2 G o r k h a Nyak Lokpa N 1 " d 4 5 Phedi 0 p ' 9 Awa 9 5 3 2 r Eklebhati ° 8 Pangsin 2 e a Sirdibas Philim 8 2 Nakchet Ghattekhola Sanu philim W N Pamo L a m j u n g 7 ( 1 Pti Payu Salleri n Bhalugaun 9 N " o Bhalubhan gaun 0 9 9 ' i 0 7 Lhakpa 2 C H I N A ° t Uhiya 8 Keroja 2 a M a n a n g Thulodunga 6 Maiku r Dungla 8 9 Gumda Phaiban Hulchuck e 5 3 Danje Bhinchet Rengbon 3 8 p 7
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Gorkha OSOCC Assessment Cell 09.05.2015
    Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Gorkha OSOCC Assessment Cell 09.05.2015 This report is produced by the OSOCC Assessment Cell based on secondary data from multiple sources, including the Government of Nepal, UNDAC, United Nations Agencies, non-governmental organisation and media sources. I. Situation Overview Gorkha, with a population of more than 271,000, is one of the worst-affected districts.1 The epicenter of the earthquake was in Brapok, 15km from Gorkha town. As of 6 May, 412 people have been reported killed and 1,034 injured. In the southern part of the district, food has been provided, but field observations indicate that the food supplied might not be enough for the actual population in the area. Several VDCs in the mountainous areas of Gorkha are yet to be reached by humanitarian assistance. There are no roads in these northern areas, only footpaths. The level of destruction within the district and even within VDCs varies widely, as does the availability of food. A humanitarian hub has been set up at the Chief District Officer’s (CDO) premises in Gorkha town. Reported number of people in need (multiple sources) The figures featured in this map have been collected via multiple sources (district authorities, Red Cross, local NGO, media). Where multiple figures for the same location have been reported the highest one was taken. These figures are indicative and do not represent the overall number of people in need. 1 This is an updated version of the Gorkha District Profile that was published by ACAPS on 1 May 2015. As with other mountain areas of Nepal, Gorkha contains popular locations for foreign trekkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • District Report Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform, Nepal Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform
    Monthly District Report Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform, Nepal Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform District Report Gorkha 12 April – 9 May 2019 Summary of events during this period Name of activity/event Event date Participants Contact Person Reference summary Document Male Female HRRP team, M & E consultant, 15th to 19 techcord.gorkha@hrrpnepal and DSE conducted field visit April 2019 .org; at Barpak Sulikot and Dharche [email protected] Rural Municipality from 15th to 19 April 2019. The details action plans and objective of the meeting has been stated in the field visit section. HRRP/GMALI jointly organized 17th April 14 1 Techcord.gorkha@hrrpnepal preparatory meeting with POs 2019 .org, for the program of Earthquake [email protected], Memorial Day in presence of [email protected] CDO, Gorkha, Mayor of Gorkha Municipality, and key POs in the district. The agenda of the meeting to jointly organize the earthquake Memorial Day effectively to disseminate message of safer construction and resilient community. GMALI Gorkha organized 4th 25th April [email protected] Earthquake Memorial Day in 2019 [email protected] Gorkha on 25th April 2019 at DCC Hall. HRRP Gorkha has facilitated the program and planning. All the active POs, government stakeholders, political leaders, local representatives, media, civil societies, representatives of bank were actively participated in the program. HRRP participated Demo 23rd April [email protected], house handover program 2019 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Gorkha District Assessment Form
    Nepal Gorkha District Assessment Form IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION I2 DATE OF ASSESSMENT * I3 ENUMERATOR NAME * yyyy­mm­dd I4 DISTRICT * I5 VDC/MUNICIPALITY * I5 VDC/MUNICIPALITY * Please specify Gorkha Bihi Chhaikampar Chumchet Lho Prok Samagaun Sirdibas Uhya Other (specify) I6 WARD * I7 VILLAGE NAME * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Do not know I8 GPS COORDINATES GPS coordinates can only be collected when outside. latitude (x.y °) longitude (x.y °) altitude (m) accuracy (m) I9 SOURCE(S) FOR THIS ASSESSMENT None 1 2 3 or more Select the number of people you spoke to for each category . * Official (administrative) . * Village representative . * Religious leader . * Army or police . * Health worker . * Social worker . * International NGO / development partner . * Teacher . * Other local person I10 HOW MANY OF THOSE KEY INFORMANTS WERE WOMEN? * COMMUNITY PROFILE » Total population P1 ENTER THE PERCENTAGE OF THE OVERALL POPULATION WHO ARE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES. Needs to add up to 100% * * * % in normal situation % requiring assistance % requiring immediate assistance » Male P2 ENTER THE PERCENTAGE OF THE MALE POPULATION WHO ARE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES. Needs to add up to 100% * * * % in normal situation % requiring assistance % requiring immediate assistance » Female P3 ENTER THE PERCENTAGE OF THE FEMALE POPULATION WHO ARE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES. Needs to add up to 100% * * * % in normal situation % requiring assistance % requiring immediate assistance » Children P4 ENTER THE PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN WHO ARE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES. Needs
    [Show full text]
  • NEPAL: Gorkha - Operational Presence Map [As of 14 July 2015]
    NEPAL: Gorkha - Operational Presence Map [as of 14 July 2015] 60 Samagaun Partners working in Gorkha Chhekampar 1-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-35 Lho Bihi Prok Chunchet Partners working in Nepal Sirdibas Health 26 Keroja Shelter and NFI Uhiya 23 Ghyachok Laprak WASH 18 Kharibot Warpak Gumda Kashigaun Protection 13 Lapu HansapurSimjung Muchchok Manbu Kerabari Sairpani Thumo Early Recovery 6 Jaubari Swara Thalajung Aaruaarbad Harmi ShrithankotTar k u k ot Amppipal ArupokhariAruchanaute Education 5 Palungtar Chhoprak Masel Tandrang Khoplang Tap le Gaikhur Dhawa Virkot PhinamAsrang Nutrition 1 Chyangling Borlang Bungkot Prithbinarayan Municipality Namjung DhuwakotDeurali Bakrang GhairungTan gli ch ok Tak lu ng Phujel Manakamana Makaising Darbung Mumlichok Ghyalchok IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS BY CLUSTER Early Recovery Education Health 6 partners 5 partners 26 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 >=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 Nutrition Protection Shelter and NFI 1 partners 13 partners 23 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 >=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 WASH 18 partners Want to find out the latest 3W products and other info on Nepal Earthquake response? visit the Humanitarian Response website at http:www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/op Nb of Note: organisations Implementing partners represent the organization on the ground, erations/nepal in the affected district doing operational work, such as send feedback to 1 >=5 distributing food, tents, water purification kits etc. [email protected] Creation date:23 July 2015 Glide number: EQ-2015-000048-NPL Sources: Cluster reporting The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • TSLC PMT Result
    Page 62 of 132 Rank Token No SLC/SEE Reg No Name District Palika WardNo Father Mother Village PMTScore Gender TSLC 1 42060 7574O15075 SOBHA BOHARA BOHARA Darchula Rithachaupata 3 HARI SINGH BOHARA BIMA BOHARA AMKUR 890.1 Female 2 39231 7569013048 Sanju Singh Bajura Gotree 9 Gyanendra Singh Jansara Singh Manikanda 902.7 Male 3 40574 7559004049 LOGAJAN BHANDARI Humla ShreeNagar 1 Hari Bhandari Amani Bhandari Bhandari gau 907 Male 4 40374 6560016016 DHANRAJ TAMATA Mugu Dhainakot 8 Bali Tamata Puni kala Tamata Dalitbada 908.2 Male 5 36515 7569004014 BHUVAN BAHADUR BK Bajura Martadi 3 Karna bahadur bk Dhauli lawar Chaurata 908.5 Male 6 43877 6960005019 NANDA SINGH B K Mugu Kotdanda 9 Jaya bahadur tiruwa Muga tiruwa Luee kotdanda mugu 910.4 Male 7 40945 7535076072 Saroj raut kurmi Rautahat GarudaBairiya 7 biswanath raut pramila devi pipariya dostiya 911.3 Male 8 42712 7569023079 NISHA BUDHa Bajura Sappata 6 GAN BAHADUR BUDHA AABHARI BUDHA CHUDARI 911.4 Female 9 35970 7260012119 RAMU TAMATATA Mugu Seri 5 Padam Bahadur Tamata Manamata Tamata Bamkanda 912.6 Female 10 36673 7375025003 Akbar Od Baitadi Pancheswor 3 Ganesh ram od Kalawati od Kalauti 915.4 Male 11 40529 7335011133 PRAMOD KUMAR PANDIT Rautahat Dharhari 5 MISHRI PANDIT URMILA DEVI 915.8 Male 12 42683 7525055002 BIMALA RAI Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Man Bahadur Rai Gauri Maya Rai Ghodghad 915.9 Female 13 42758 7525055016 SABIN AALE MAGAR Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Raj Kumar Aale Magqar Devi Aale Magar Ghodghad 915.9 Male 14 42459 7217094014 SOBHA DHAKAL Dolakha GhangSukathokar 2 Bishnu Prasad Dhakal
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Agreement to Guide Multi-Purpose Cash Interventions in Earthquake Affected Vdcs in Gorkha District
    Letter of Agreement To guide multi-purpose cash interventions in earthquake affected VDCs in Gorkha District Background: The multi-purpose or unconditional cash grant (MPG) is based on the understanding that in the emergency period following the 26 April and 12 May earthquakes, the majority of affected households are struggling to meet their basic daily needs. The MPG is understood here as a one-off financial assistance with no conditions to receive and no restrictions to be spent by earthquake affected households. The value of the MPG has been agreed at 7,500 NRs (approximately 75 US$) for one month for one household.1 Parties: This document constitutes an agreement between the national/international non-governmental organization (I/NGO) ____________________________________ and the local authority ____________________________________ regarding the provision of multi-purpose cash assistance by the I/NGO to ______ (no.) earthquake affected households in _______________ VDC in Gorkha Districts. Cash-assistance can be provided as follows: 1. To damaged and destroyed households in the nine hard-to-reach northern VDCs2 ______ (no.) households in the following northern VDCs will receive multi-purpose grant in the amount of _______ per household for the duration of ________ months: ______________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ 2. To households included in the Government of Nepal’s Social Protection Program
    [Show full text]
  • SASEC) Power System Expansion Project (SPEP
    Environmental Impact Assessment February 2014 NEP: South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC) Power System Expansion Project (SPEP) Prepared by Nepal Electricity Authority for the Asian Development Bank. This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Asian Development Bank Nepal: South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC) Power System Expansion Project (SPEP) On-grid Components ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Draft – February 2014 i ADB TA 8272-NEP working draft – February 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 Executive Summary 1 2 Policy, Legal, and Administrative Framework 4 3 Description of the Project 19 4 Description of the Environment 28 Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation 5 96 Measures Information Disclosure, Consultation, and 6 112 Participation 7 Environmental Management Program 115 8 Conclusions and Recommendations 12 8 Appendices 1 Important Flora and Fauna 13 7 2 Habitat Maps 15 9 3 Summary of Offsetting Activities 16 9 Routing Maps in Annapurna Conservation Area
    [Show full text]
  • MA503 - Gorkha Deaths by VDC
    MA503 - Gorkha Deaths by VDC China ´ Nepal India N " 0 ' 0 4 ° 8 2 Samagaun Total: 0 Chhekampar Total: 1 Manang Lho Total: 3 Bihi N Total: 2 " 0 Chunchet ' 0 3 Total: 0 ° Prok 8 2 Total: 0 Sirdibas Total: 6 Gorkha N " Keroja 0 ' 0 Lamjung Total: 19 2 ° 8 2 Uhiya Total: 17 Kharibot Laprak Total: 6 Total: 20 Ghyachok Total: 16 Gumda Total: 39 Warpak Kashigaun Total: 68 Total: 4 Lapu N " 0 Total: 20 ' Hansapur 0 Simjung 1 ° Total: 5 8 Total: 35 2 O Kerabari S!airpani Manbu Muchchok Total: 1 Total: 41 Thumo Total: 20 Total: 24 Total: 26 Jaubari Swara Total: 1 Takumaj Total: 18 Thalajung Hlakuri Rasuwa Total: 0 Total: 0 Aaruaarbad Harmi Shrithankot Panchkhuwa Total: 12 Total: 1 Total: 0 Deurali Total: 1 Tarkukot Aruchanaute Amppipal Total: 14 Gangkhu Total: 0 Pandrung Arupokhari Total: 0 Total: 1 Total: 0 Masel Total: 4 Palungtar Chhoprak Total: 3 Total: 1 Khoplang Total: 4 Tandrang Taple Baguwa Total: 3 Nataeshwar Total: 1 Total: 0 Total: 2 Total: 0 Gaikhur Asrang Dhawa N " Total: 0 Phinam 0 Total: 7 ' Total: 1 0 Virkot ° Total: 0 8 2 Total: 0 Prithbinarayan Borlang Chyangling Municipality Total: 1 Total: 0 Total: 7 Bungkot Dhading Dhuwakot Total: 2 Total: 0 Deurali Bakrang Namjung Total: 0 Total: 3 Ghairung Total: 1 Total: 1 Taklung Phujel Total: 0 Total: 0 Nuwakot Manakamana Tanglichok Tanahu Total: 1 Total: 0 Makaising Total: 0 Darbung Mumlichok Map shows the numbers of deaths reported per N Total: 0 " Total: 0 0 VDC in Gorkha district.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Survival 8 Quarterly Report
    Save the Children/US Nepal Field Office Cooperative Agreement No. FAO-0500-A-00-2034-00 CHILD SURVIVAL 8 QUARTERLY REPORT Period: April - June, 1993 Save the Children/US Nepal Field Office Cooperative Agreement No. FAO-0500-A-00-2034-00 CHILD SURVIVAL VIII - QUARTERLY REPORT April - June 1993 L ProjectArea: Nuwakot District, Ilaka 1, 12 and 13 Total VDCs: 14 IL Population: 38098 Children under 5 years: 6096 Women 15 - 45 years: 7620 IM. Goal: Sustained reduction in infant child and maternal mortality and morbidity through empowering families to address their health, educational and developmental needs and by creating an increasing demand for improved government health services. IV. Objectives/activitiesof the third quarter: Following are the objectives and achievements of the third quarter: 1. To form 6 parent's groups (6 fathers and 6 mothers) Achievement: During this reporting period 12 mothers and 12 fathers groups are formed despite of 6 each. The coming quarter (July - Sept) is the peak working season for community people and because of this planting season there was very little possibility to form the groups. Thus many groups have been formed during this reporting period to compensate the number of groups formation during July - September to meet annual target. These groups have received classes ranging from I to 3 times on various child survival topics viz; immunization, diarrhoea and sanitation. 2. To form 3 child to child groups Achievement: Six child to child groups have been formed and are receiving monthly classes on personal hygiene and sanitation. They seem very interested and enthusiastic to receive such classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Landslide Inventory, Susceptibility Mapping and Recommendation of the Mitigation Measures in Nuwakot District
    Journal of NepalLandslide Geological inventory, Society, susceptibility 2017, Vol. 53, mapping pp. 107-118. and recommendation of the mitigation measures in Nuwakot district Landslide inventory, susceptibility mapping and recommendation of the mitigation measures in Nuwakot District *Jagannath Joshi1, Dipak Bharadwaj2, Pradeep Paudyal3, and Niroj Timalsina4 1Hariyo Ban Program, CARE Nepal 2Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management, Government of Nepal 3Amrit Science Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal 4International Center for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal *(Corresponding email: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Nepal earthquake of 25th April 2015 and subsequent big aftershocks impacted people, land, and water resources significantly. Following the devastating earthquake, land and water management has become one of the primary focus of the Government of Nepal as these resources are foundations of people’s livelihood and prosperity. The weakened, cracked, and destabilized slopes and surfaces due to the earthquake become even more susceptible to landslides that can be aggravated due to rainfall and inappropriate anthropogenic activities. Due to the devastating earthquake, 31 districts of Nepal out of 75 were affected with 14 being severely affected resulted huge loss of human life, property, and ecosystem services. These 14 districts were categorized as severely hit and crisis hit districts by the post disaster need assessment (PDNA) carried out by Government of Nepal. Nuwakot district is one of the severely hit district. In order to reduce vulnerability and/or threat of potential landslide disasters and protect local people, infrastructures, land and water resources from potential landslide disaster, identification of the most susceptible slopes as well as treatment and mitigation of the most critical landslides deemed essential.
    [Show full text]