DOCSLIB.ORG

Filed: 7 September 2015 4:11 PM Defence to Amended Statement Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Filed: 7 September 2015 4:11 PM D0000MPBZE Defence to Amended Statement of Claim COURT DETAILS Court Supreme Court of NSW Division Common Law List Common Law General Registry Supreme Court Sydney Case number 2014/00200854 TITLE OF PROCEEDINGS First Plaintiff Rodriguez & Sons First Defendant Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater Second Defendant SunWater Limited ( ACN 131 034 985) Number of Defendants 3 FILING DETAILS Filed for Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater, Defendant 1 Legal representative Justin McDonnell Legal representative reference Telephone 07 3244 8114 Your reference Defence of the First Defendant ATTACHMENT DETAILS In accordance with Part 3 of the UCPR, this coversheet confirms that both the Lodge Document, along with any other documents listed below, were filed by the Court. General Form (Defence of the First Defendant to the Further Amended Statement of Claim (07 09 15).pdf) [attach.] jmcdonn001 Page 1 of 1 Filed: 7 September 2015 4:11 PM Form 7A (version 5) UCPR 14.3 DEFENCE OF THE FIRST DEFENDANT (To Further Amended Statement of Claim) COURT DETAILS Court Supreme Court of New South Wales Division Common Law Registry Sydney Case number 2014 / 200854 TITLE OF PROCEEDINGS Plaintiff Rodriguez & Sons Pty Limited (ACN 108 770 681) First Defendant Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority, trading as Seqwater Number of defendants 3 FILING DETAILS Filed for Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority, trading as Seqwater, First Defendant Legal representative Justin McDonnell, King & Wood Mallesons Legal representative reference JAM/NC 0455057758 Contact name and telephone Justin McDonnell; (07) 3244 8099 Contact email [email protected] 20982018_10 2 Index The First Defendant adopts the headings set out in the Further Amended Statement of Claim. A The Plaintiff 6 B The Defendants 6 C January 2011 Queensland Flood 6 D Group Members and Common Questions 7 E Somerset Dam 9 F Wivenhoe Dam 16 G Flood Mitigation 26 Policy and regulatory framework 26 Safety and Reliability 40 The Interim Program 41 H Seqwater’s Ownership and Control of Somerset Dam and Wivenhoe Dam 47 I SunWater’s Control of Somerset Dam and Wivenhoe Dam 50 J The Flood Mitigation Manual 52 Status, Purpose and Objectives of the Flood Mitigation Manual 52 Flood Operations Personnel and Responsibilities 54 Definition of “Flood Event” 57 Wivenhoe Dam Flood Operations Strategies 58 Somerset Dam Flood Operations Strategies 66 K The Real Time Flood Model 72 L Duties of Care 79 Risk of Harm 79 Seqwater’s Duty of Care as Owner and Occupier 80 Seqwater’s Direct Duty of Care as Sole Licensee under the Water Act 80 SunWater’s Direct Duty of Care 81 Flood Engineers’ Duty of Care 81 M Events of 1 December to 16 December 2010 81 Rainfall and Inflows 81 Water Level 83 3 Flood Operations 85 16 December Breaches 95 N Events of 17 December to 24 December 2010 97 Weather Forecasts 97 Rainfall and Inflows 102 Water Level 102 Flood Operations 109 17-24 December Breaches 117 O Events of 25 December 2010 to 1 January 2011 119 Weather Forecasts 119 Rainfall and Inflows 124 Water Level 124 Flood Operations 132 25 December – 1 January Breaches 141 P Events of 2 January 2011 143 Weather Forecasts 143 Rainfall and Inflows 144 Water Level 146 Flood Operations 148 2 January 2011 Breaches 149 Q Events of 3 January to 5 January 2011 152 Weather Forecasts 152 Rainfall and Inflows 153 Water Level 154 Flood Operations 156 3 – 5 January 2011 Breaches 157 R Events of 6 January 2011 159 Weather Forecasts 159 Rainfall and Inflows 160 Water Level 163 Flood Operations 164 4 6 January 2011 Breaches 166 S Events of 7 January 2011 169 Weather Forecasts 169 Rainfall and Inflows 169 Water Level 173 Flood Operations 176 7 January 2011 Breaches 178 T Events of 8 January 2011 180 Weather Forecasts 180 Rainfall and Inflows 181 Water Level 184 Flood Operations 186 8 January 2011 Breaches 188 U Events of 9 January 2011 190 Weather Forecasts 190 Rainfall and Inflows 191 Water Level 195 Flood Operations 198 9 January 2011 Breaches 200 V Events of 10 January to 11 January 2011 202 Weather Forecasts 202 Rainfall and Inflows 204 Water Level 210 Flood Operations 215 10 – 11 January 2011 Breaches 218 W Causation and Loss 220 X Direct Liability of Seqwater and SunWater in negligence 221 Direct Liability of Seqwater in Negligence 221 Liability of SunWater in Negligence 221 Y Private Nuisance and Trespass 222 Z Vicarious Liability 224 5 Vicarious Liability of Seqwater 224 Vicarious Liability of SunWater 225 Vicarious Liability of the State of Queensland 225 AA Section 374 of the Water Supply Act 225 BB Relief 226 6 PLEADINGS AND PARTICULARS A The Plaintiff 1 In relation to paragraph 1 of the Further Amended Statement of Claim (“FASOC”), the First Defendant, Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority, trading as Seqwater (“Seqwater”): (a) admits paragraph 1(a); (b) admits that the plaintiff held a registered lease over a shopfront in a shopping centre located at 180 Fairfield Road, Fairfield, shop 9 on lot 5 on plan RP 212124, Parish of Yeerongpilly, County of Stanley in the State of Queensland during December 2010 and January 2011; and (c) subject to (b) above, does not know and therefore cannot admit the allegations pleaded in paragraphs 1(b) and (c). B The Defendants 2 Seqwater admits the allegations pleaded in paragraph 2 of the FASOC. 3 Seqwater admits the allegations pleaded in paragraph 3 of the FASOC. 4 Seqwater admits the allegations pleaded in paragraph 4 of the FASOC. C January 2011 Queensland Flood 5 In relation to paragraph 5 of the FASOC, Seqwater pleads that: (a) over the 28 days prior to 6 January 2011, rainfall in South East Queensland had been well above the average rainfall for that period; (b) the Brisbane River Basin has an area of approximately 14,000km2 (approximately half of which is located downstream of Wivenhoe Dam) and comprises the five main catchments of the: (i) Stanley River to Somerset Dam, which is approximately 1,320km2 (“Somerset Dam Catchment”); (ii) Upper Brisbane River to Wivenhoe Dam (excluding the Somerset Dam Catchment), which is approximately 5,650km2 (“Wivenhoe Dam Catchment”); (iii) Lockyer Creek to O’Reilly’s Weir, which is approximately 2,960km2 (“Lockyer Creek Catchment”); 7 (iv) Bremer River to Ipswich which includes the sub-catchments of Warrill Creek to Amberley and Purga Creek to Loamside, which is approximately 1,745km2 (“Bremer River Catchment”); and (v) Lower Brisbane River to the river mouth (residual area), which is approximately 1,855km2 (“Lower Brisbane River Catchment”); (c) the combined Somerset Dam Catchment and Wivenhoe Dam Catchment is approximately 6,990km2 (“Combined Dam Catchments”); (d) the Lockyer Creek Catchment, Bremer River Catchment and Lower Brisbane River Catchment, including smaller contributing tributaries, are all located downstream of Wivenhoe Dam (collectively, the “Downstream Catchments”), and have a combined catchment area of approximately 7,000km2; Particulars of (b)-(d) Seqwater, Brisbane River Flood Hydrology Models – Main Report, December 2013, Executive Summary, page 13 [SEQ.009.003.0359] (e) the rainfall which fell in the 28 day period prior to 6 January 2011 resulted in the Combined Dam Catchments and the Downstream Catchments becoming wet though not saturated because there had been periods of zero or low rainfall which meant that the catchments had some opportunity to dry out meaning that some initial Loss (as defined in paragraph 165 below) had been recovered; (f) in the period from 6 to 12 January 2011, further substantial rainfall fell across South East Queensland including over the Downstream Catchments and the Combined Dam Catchments; (g) the rainfall which fell in the period 6 to 12 January 2011, resulted in flooding of areas along the Bremer River and Lockyer Creek and along the Brisbane River downstream of Wivenhoe Dam; and (h) subject to the matters pleaded in (a) to (g) above, Seqwater otherwise admits the allegations pleaded in paragraph 5. D Group Members and Common Questions 6 In relation to paragraph 6 of the FASOC, Seqwater: (a) pleads that the pleading in paragraph 6 of the composition of the group of persons on whose behalf the proceedings have been commenced by the Plaintiff (“Group Members”) does not comply with section 157 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) (“CPA”) because not all of the Group Members have claims against any one or more of the Defendants, contrary to section 157(1)(a) of the CPA, since: 8 (i) the claims against the Defendants are pleaded to arise from loss or damage caused by the “Greater Flooding” defined in paragraph 346(b) of the FASOC; (ii) paragraph 6 identifies the Group Members by reference to, relevantly, the inundation of land by flood waters from the Brisbane River or the Bremer River (and their tributaries); (iii) the scope of the inundation pleaded in paragraph 6 is broader than, and in addition, or in the alternative, does not correlate to, the Greater Flooding pleaded in paragraph 346(b); and (iv) therefore, not all Group Members may have claims against any one or more of the Defendants because a Group Member may have been inundated as pleaded in paragraph 6 but not have suffered loss or damage caused by the Greater Flooding pleaded in paragraph 346(b); (b) does not admit that the Plaintiff is an appropriate representative of the Group Members for the purposes of section 157 of the CPA because Seqwater cannot admit, as it does not know, that the Plaintiff suffered loss or damage either from inundation of land by flood waters from the Brisbane River or the Bremer River (and their tributaries) as pleaded in paragraph 6 or from the Greater Flooding pleaded in paragraph 346(a); and (c) otherwise does not admit, as it does not know, the allegations pleaded in paragraph 6.
Recommended publications
  • ATK2-1 Wivenhoe Power Station Geological Inspection Report by 19

    ATK2-1 Wivenhoe Power Station Geological Inspection Report by 19

    QUEENSLAND FLOODS COMMISSION OF INQUIRY STATEMENT OF ANDREW KROTEWICZ TABLE OF EXHIBITS ATK2-1 Wivenhoe Power Station Geological Inspection Report by 19 January 2011 SunWater On 3 November 20111, Andrew Krotewicz of ci Level 2, HQ North Tower, 540 Wickham Street, Fortitude Valley in the State of Queensland, say on oath: I am the former General Manager Generation Operations of Tarong Energy Corporation. I held this position between 1 September 2007 and 30 June 2011. 2. On 1 July 2011, I was appointed the Executive General Manager Asset Strategy of CS Energy at the same time as CS Energy became the successor in law to Tarong Energy Corporation of the Wivenhoe Business Unit as defined in the Government Owned Corporations Act 1993 (QId) (Generator Restructure) Regulation 2011 which includes the Wivenhoe Power Station and rights to move water in and out of Splityard Creek Dam. 3. This statement is supplementary to the two prior statements dated 13 September 2011. For the period 1 October 2010 to 31 March 2011: 4.0 1(a) a description of whether and how the communication requirements set out in the following documents were complied with and 1(b) to the extent that either of these documents were not complied with, and explanation as to why compliance did not occur: Deed of Practice between Seqwater and Tarong Energy Corporation (Tarong Energy) for Wiven hoe Dam and Wivenhoe Power Station. Wivenhoe Power Station Business Procedure for Wivenhoe - High Rainfall, High Dam Water Levels (WI V-OPS-1 5). Deed of Practice 4.1 On 4 October 2010 Seqwater requested under the terms of the Deed of Practice that a notification protocol be initiated to allow Seqwater to receive notice of impending water releases to/ extraction from Lake Wivenhoe by Wivenhoe Power Station.
  • Lin-Et-Al-2018.Pdf

    Lin-Et-Al-2018.Pdf

    Received: 20 February 2017 Revised: 13 July 2017 Accepted: 17 July 2017 DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2831 RESEARCH ARTICLE Impacts of fishing, river flow and connectivity loss on the conservation of a migratory fish population Hsien‐Yung Lin1 | Christopher J. Brown2 | Ross G. Dwyer3 | Doug J. Harding4 | David T. Roberts5 | Richard A. Fuller1 | Simon Linke2 | Hugh P. Possingham1 1 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, The Abstract University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 1. Migratory species depend on connected habitats and appropriate migratory cues to complete Australia their life cycles. Diadromous fish exemplify species with migratory life cycles by moving 2 The Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith between connected freshwater and saltwater habitats to reproduce. However, migration University, Nathan, QLD, Australia increases the exposure of fish to multiple threats and it is critical that managers integrate hab- 3 School of Biological Sciences, The University itat connectivity into resource management and conservation. of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia 4 Department of Natural Resources and Mines, 2. The benefit of alternative management actions was assessed for a diadromous fish, the Landcentre, Woolloongabba, Australia Australian bass Percalates novemaculeata, using a spatio‐temporal population model informed 5 Seqwater, Ipswich, QLD, Australia by individual‐based movement data. The management actions comprise seasonal closures Correspondence during the spawning season, and controlling fishing pressure by limiting catch or effort. Hsien‐Yung Lin, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological 3. The benefits of implementing seasonal closures depend upon interactions among how fishing Sciences, The University of Queensland, St pressure is controlled, the response of anglers to fishery regulations and river flow regimes.
  • Wivenhoe Power Station Noise Control

    Wivenhoe Power Station Noise Control

    Wivenhoe Power Station Noise Control PROJECT: Wivenhoe Power Station INDUSTRY TYPE: Power Generation CLIENT: CS Energy LOCATION: Wivenhoe Initial project requirements: Wivenhoe Power Station, operated by CS Energy, is a hydropower generating system. Wivenhoe is approximately 50 km west of Brisbane and is the only pumped hydroelectric storage plant in Queensland. Not only is the power station the only pumped storage hydroelectric plant in Queensland, but it also has two of the largest hydro machines in Australia – 285 MW generators. The power station cycles water between Splityard Creek Dam and Wivenhoe Dam. The power station turbine room generates high noise levels, creating an uncomfortable working environment for the adjacent offices. Flexshield solution: Flexshield has an existing working relationship with CS Energy, having also worked with CS Energy at Kogan Creek Power Station. The Flexshield Group has a long experience working on Power Station noise control solutions across Australia - the full list is at the end of the case study. For our current project with CS Energy, our AcousTech senior acoustic project engineer visited the site to conduct an acoustic assessment and design the solution. The solution included treating the existing office with high-density V100 Sonic System modular acoustic panel facing the perforations into the room. We also replaced the current non-acoustic cold room doors with Flexshield high- performance Sonic Access Rw46 acoustic doors. Noise levels were further reduced by adding Calando Nude White panels to the ceiling. We sourced the Calando Panel from our Commercial Acoustics Company – Avenue Interior Systems. The solution Flexshield provided made a more comfortable working environment - allowing workers to communicate better and improve the number of sick days due to noise fatigue.
  • Fact Sheet Wivenhoe Dam

    Fact Sheet Wivenhoe Dam

    Fact sheet Wivenhoe Dam Wivenhoe Dam Wivenhoe Dam’s primary function is to provide a safe drinking Key facts water supply to the people of Brisbane and surrounding areas. It also provides flood mitigation. Name Wivenhoe Dam (Lake Wivenhoe) Watercourse Brisbane River The water from Lake Wivenhoe, the reservoir formed by the dam, is stored before being treated to produce drinking water Location Upstream of Fernvale and follows the water journey of source, store and supply. Catchment area 7020.0 square kilometres Length of dam wall 2300.0 metres Source Year completed 1984 Wivenhoe Dam is located on the Brisbane River in the Somerset Type of construction Zoned earth and rock fill Regional Council area. embankment Spillway gates 5 Water supply Full supply capacity 1,165,238 megalitres Wivenhoe Dam provides a safe drinking water supply for Flood mitigation 1,967,000 megalitres Brisbane, Ipswich, Logan, Gold Coast, Beaudesert, Esk, Gatton, Laidley, Kilcoy, Nanango and surrounding areas. The construction of the dam involved the placement of around 4 million cubic metres of earth and rock fill, and around 140,000 Wivenhoe Dam was designed and built as a multifunctional cubic metres of concrete in the spillway section. Excavation facility. The dam was built upstream of the Brisbane River, of 2 million cubic metres of earth and rock was necessary to 80 kilometres from Brisbane City. At full supply level, the dam construct the spillway. holds approximately 2,000 times the daily water consumption needed for Brisbane. The Brisbane Valley Highway was relocated to pass over the dam wall, while 65 kilometres of roads and a number of new Wivenhoe Dam, along with the Somerset, Hinze and North Pine bridges were required following construction of the dam.
  • Wyaralong Dam: Issues and Alternatives

    Wyaralong Dam: Issues and Alternatives

    Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives Issues associated with the proposed construction of a dam on the Teviot Brook, South East Queensland 2nd edition October 2006 Report prepared by Dr G Bradd Witt and Katherine Witt The proposed Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives 2nd edition October 2006 Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives Issues associated with the proposed construction of a dam on the Teviot Brook, South East Queensland 2nd Edition October 2006 Report prepared by Dr G Bradd Witt and Katherine Witt - 1 - The proposed Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives 2nd edition October 2006 Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................. i 1.0 Executive summary ................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Key issues identified in this report ........................................ 2 1.3 Alternative proposition ........................................................ 3 2.0 Introduction and context............................................................ 5 2.1 The Wyaralong District ........................................................ 5 2.2 The Teviot Catchment ......................................................... 5 3.0 Key issues of concern ................................................................ 7 3.1 Catchment yield and dam yield ............................................ 7 3.2 Water quality...................................................................
  • Queensland Commission of Audit's Final

    Queensland Commission of Audit's Final

    Queensland Commission of Audit Final Report - February 2013 Volume 2 Queensland Commission of Audit Final Report February 2013 - Volume 2 Final Report February 2013 - Volume © Crown copyright All rights reserved Queensland Government 2013 Excerpts from this publication may be reproduced, with appropriate achnowledgement, as permitted under the Copyright Act Queensland Commission of Audit Final Report - February 2013 Volume 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FINAL REPORT VOLUME 1 Transmittal Letter ...................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. iii Explanatory Notes .................................................................................................... iv Terms of Reference .................................................................................................. v Report Linkages to Terms of Reference .................................................................. vii Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Executive Summary .............................................................................................. 1-3 List of Recommendations .................................................................................... 1-27 Glossary .............................................................................................................
  • Powerlink Queensland Revenue Proposal

    Powerlink Queensland Revenue Proposal

    2023-27 POWERLINK QUEENSLAND REVENUE PROPOSAL Appendix 5.02 – PUBLIC 2020 Transmission Annual Planning Report © Copyright Powerlink Queensland 2021 Transmission Annual Planning Report 2020 Transmission Annual Planning Report Please direct Transmission Annual Planning Report (TAPR) enquiries to: Stewart Bell A/Executive General Manager Strategy and Business Development Division Powerlink Queensland Telephone: (07) 3860 2801 Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: While care is taken in the preparation of the information in this report, and it is provided in good faith, Powerlink Queensland accepts no responsibility or liability for any loss or damage that may be incurred by persons acting in reliance on this information or assumptions drawn from it. 2020 TRANSMISSION ANNUAL PLANNING REPORT Table of contents Executive summary __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 1. Introduction ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 15 1.1 Introduction ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 16 1.2 Context of the TAPR _________________________________________________________________________________ 16 1.3 Purpose of the TAPR _________________________________________________________________________________ 17 1.4 Role of Powerlink Queensland _______________________________________________________________________ 17 1.5 Meeting the challenges of a transitioning energy system ___________________________________________
  • Manual of Operational Procedures for Flood Mitigation at Wivenhoe Dam and Somerset Dam 1 the Controlled Version of This Document Is Registered

    Manual of Operational Procedures for Flood Mitigation at Wivenhoe Dam and Somerset Dam 1 the Controlled Version of This Document Is Registered

    Wivenhoe Dam and Somerset Dam Manual of Operational Procedures for Flood Mitigation Revision 15 | November 2019 15 Revision No. Date Amendment Details 0 27 October 1968 Original issue. 1 6 October 1992 Complete revision and re-issue. 2 13 November 1997 Complete revision and re-issue. 3 24 August 1998 Change to page 23. 4 6 September 2002 Complete revision and re-issue. 5 4 October 2004 Complete revision. 6 20 December 2004 Miscellaneous amendments and re-issue. 7 November 2009 (approved by Gazette notice Complete revision. 22 January 2010) 8 September 2011 Revision but no substantive alteration of objectives, strategies or operating practices. 9 November 2011 Insertion of Section 8 and consequential amendments. 10 October 2012 Revision but no substantive alteration of objectives, strategies or operating practices. 11 November 2013 Revision to take account of changes to the Act and improve clarity, but no substantive alteration of objectives or strategies. Operating practices amended to exclude consideration of Twin Bridges and Savages Crossing following stakeholder input. 12 November 2014 Significant revision including changes from WSDOS investigations, legislative changes and a number of general improvements. 13 November 2015 A number of minor updates to improve readability and application. 14 November 2016 Changes to account for the revised Maximum Flood Storage Level for Somerset Dam and a number of general improvements. 15 November 2019 Revision Revision No: 15 – November 2019 Seqwater Doc No: MAN-0051 Manual of Operational Procedures for Flood Mitigation at Wivenhoe Dam and Somerset Dam 1 The controlled version of this document is registered. All other versions including printed versions are uncontrolled.
  • Resilient Rivers Fact Sheet

    Resilient Rivers Fact Sheet

    FACT SHEET Resilient Rivers Initiative The Council of Mayors (SEQ) Resilient Rivers Within the catchment, the Mid-Logan reach between Initiative is a collaborative program to improve the Cedar Grove Weir and Beaudesert has been health and resilience of South East Queensland’s identified as an area that would benefit from focused catchments, rivers and Moreton Bay. riparian restoration and protection. Logan-Albert Catchment Action Plan Landholders are supported with riverbank restoration achieved through weed management, revegetation, The Logan-Albert Catchment Action Plan (CAP) gully stabilisation, stock fencing and off-stream identifies the high risk of sediment movement from watering. the catchment and its downstream impact on the Logan and Albert Rivers and Moreton Bay. These actions are funded by the Resilient Rivers Initiative through pooled funding contributed by A goal of the action plan is to keep soil on our land member councils of the Council of Mayors (SEQ). and out of our waterways to support agricultural This includes Logan City Council and Scenic Rim productivity and improve water quality. Regional Council. Priority reach Collaborations Successful delivery of Resilient Rivers outcomes in the Logan-Albert catchment depends on strong collaboration between Logan and Scenic Rim councils, landholders and relevant entities working across the catchment. To better coordinate this collaboration, the Resilient Rivers Initiative also funds a Catchment Management Officer who works across council boundaries to deliver outcomes. Collaboration
  • Logan River Water Supply Scheme

    Logan River Water Supply Scheme

    Logan River Water Supply Scheme Scheme submission to QCA 2020-21 to 2023-24 Submitted: 30 November 2018 Contents Section Title Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Review context ........................................................................................................ 3 2. Scheme Details ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Scheme background and context ............................................................................ 3 2.2 Infrastructure details ................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Customer service standards .................................................................................... 3 2.4 Customers and water entitlements serviced ............................................................ 4 2.5 Water availability and use ....................................................................................... 4 2.5.1 Water availability ..................................................................................................... 4 2.5.2 Water use ................................................................................................................ 4 3. Irrigation Customer Consultation ............................................................................. 5 3.1 Reference group feedback .....................................................................................
  • Wyralong DAH\DRG\ECO 040806 RE.WOR

    Wyralong DAH\DRG\ECO 040806 RE.WOR

    Wyaralong Dam Initial Advice Statement Offices Brisbane Denver Karratha Melbourne Prepared For: Queensland Water Infrastructure Pty Ltd Morwell Newcastle Perth Prepared By: WBM Pty Ltd (Member of the BMT group of companies) Sydney Vancouver N:\WYARALONG\EIS\IAS\WYARALONG.DRAFT IAS (V3) - FINAL.DOC 19/9/06 08:09 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET WBM Pty Ltd Brisbane Office: Document : Document1 WBM Pty Ltd Level 11, 490 Upper Edward Street SPRING HILL QLD 4004 Project Manager : David Houghton Australia PO Box 203 Spring Hill QLD 4004 Telephone (07) 3831 6744 Client : Queensland Water Infrastructure Facsimile (07) 3832 3627 Pty Ltd www.wbmpl.com.au Lee Benson ABN 54 010 830 421 002 Client Contact: Client Reference Title : Wyaralong Dam Initial Advice Statement Author : David Houghton, Darren Richardson Synopsis : Initial Advice Statement for the EIS for the proposed Wyaralong Dam on Teviot Brook, located in the Logan River catchment. REVISION/CHECKING HISTORY REVISION DATE OF ISSUE CHECKED BY ISSUED BY NUMBER 0 26 August 2006 D Richardson D Houghton 1 5 September 2006 D Richardson D Houghton DISTRIBUTION DESTINATION REVISION 0 1 2 3 QWI 1* 1* WBM File 1 1 WBM Library PDF PDF N:\WYARALONG\EIS\IAS\WYARALONG.DRAFT IAS (V3) - FINAL.DOC 19/9/06 08:09 I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Wyaralong Dam project involves the construction of a new dam on Teviot Brook (14.8 km AMTD), a tributary of the Logan River in Southeast Queensland (SEQ). The dam will be located approximately 14.2 km north-west of Beaudesert and 50.6 km south south-west of Brisbane.
  • Energy Queensland Submission to the QCA Consultation on Regulated Retail Electricity Prices for 2020-21 – Draft Determination

    Energy Queensland Submission to the QCA Consultation on Regulated Retail Electricity Prices for 2020-21 – Draft Determination

    13 May 2020 Mr Charles Millsteed Chief Executive Officer Queensland Competition Authority GPO Box 2257 Brisbane QLD 4001 Dear Mr Millsteed Energy Queensland submission to the QCA consultation on Regulated Retail Electricity Prices for 2020-21 – Draft Determination Energy Queensland Limited (Energy Queensland) welcomes the opportunity to provide comment to the Queensland Competition Authority (QCA) on its Draft Determination for Regulated Retail Electricity Prices for 2020-21 (Draft Determination). This submission is on behalf of our retail business Ergon Energy Queensland Pty Ltd (Ergon Energy Retail), and network businesses Energex Limited (Energex) and Ergon Energy Corporation Limited (Ergon Energy Network). Energy Queensland has provided comments on the Draft Determination in the attached submission. Should the QCA require additional information or wish to discuss any aspect of this submission, please contact myself on (07) 3851 6793 or Trudy Fraser on (07) 3851 6787. Yours sincerely Karen Stafford General Manager Regulation & Pricing Telephone: (07) 3851 6793 / 0409 031 882 Email: [email protected] Encl: Energy Queensland submission to the Draft Determination Energy Queensland Limited ABN 96 612 535 583 Head Office Level 6, 420 Flinders Street, Townsville QLD 4810 PO Box 1090, Townsville QLD 4810 www.energyq.com.au Energy Queensland Submission on the Regulated Retail Electricity Prices for 2020-21 Draft Determination Energy Queensland Limited 13 May 2020 About Energy Queensland Energy Queensland Limited (Energy Queensland) is a Queensland Government Owned Corporation that operates businesses providing energy services across Queensland, including: • Distribution Network Service Providers, Energex Limited (Energex) and Ergon Energy Corporation Limited (Ergon Energy); • a regional service delivery retailer, Ergon Energy Queensland Pty Ltd (Ergon Energy Retail); and • affiliated contestable business, Yurika Pty Ltd (Yurika), which includes Metering Dynamics Pty Ltd (Metering Dynamics).