South East Queensland Regional Water Supply Strategy Desk Top Review and TOR Development Consultancy Desktop Review of Identified Dam and Weir Sites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South East Queensland Regional Water Supply Strategy Desk Top Review and TOR Development Consultancy Desktop Review of Identified Dam and Weir Sites Appendix A Initial Scoping Report 41/14840/332913 Bulk Infrastructure Task Group BSI04 Desk Top Review of Identified Dam and Weir Sites South East Queensland Regional Water Supply Strategy Desk Top Review and TOR Development Consultancy Desktop Review of Identified Dam and Weir Sites Initial Scoping Report to the Bulk Supply Infrastructure Task Group November 2005 Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objective of Part 3 1 2. Proposed Scope of Works 3 2.1 BSI 04 Desk Top Review of Identified Dam and Weir Sites 3 3. Identification and Collation of Sites/Projects 5 3.1 Sources of Information 5 3.2 Dam and Weir Water Supply Projects 6 3.3 Cost per ML/a Yield 7 3.4 Recommended Sites for Further Review 8 4. Identification of Contributions from BSI Task Group 11 5. Proposed Timings 12 5.1 What can be started now? 12 5.2 Proposed Schedule 12 Table Index Table 1 Dams Returned to Service 8 Table 2 Bulk Water Supply Projects Recommended for Further Evaluation 9 Figure Index Figure 1A Approximate Dam and Weir Locations - Southern South East Queensland Figure 1B Approximate Dam and Weir Locations - Northern South East Queensland Appendices 27th January Workshop – Summary of Findings Summary of Project Evaluation Considerations for Bulk Water Supply Projects 41/14840/333302 South East Queensland Regional Water Supply Strategy Bulk Supply Infrastructure Task Group Desk Top Review and TOR Development Consultancy 1. Introduction 1.1 Background The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the “South East Queensland Regional Water Supply Strategic Project Bulk Infrastructure Task Group” (RWSS) require a desktop review and TOR development (BSI-04) be undertaken in four parts as follows: Part 1 – Review of Gold Coast Water Supply Options; Part 2 – Review of Other Augmentation Planning; Part 3 – Desktop Review of Identified Dam and Weir Sites; and, Part 4 – Preparation of TORs for Further Consultancies. A sub-requirement of Part 3 of the consultancy is the preparation of scoping reports indicating: The proposed scope of work for this task; A refinement of the cost estimates for the task (exclusive of in-kind work by the Bulk Supply Infrastructure Task Group); A proposed methodology for screening dam and weir sites with a view to updating cost estimates only for those projects worthy of further analysis; Identification of any work contribution required from the BSI Task Group; and, A proposed schedule for the work for this task giving regard to timing of outputs required to other BSI Tasks and to other task groups. An initial scoping report is required under Part 3 summarising infrastructure options identified, with recommendations regarding which projects are to be included for further analysis as part of the desk top study. This report constitutes the initial scoping report. Following BSI Task Group approval of the options to be included for further review as outlined in the initial scoping report, a further scoping report is required which refines the scope and proposes a work schedule for the specific options to be further considered in the desk top review. 1.2 Objective of Part 3 The overall objective for Part 3 of the consultancy is to address the work required under Task BSI04 “The Desk Top Review of Identified Dam and Weir Sites” as outlined in the Bulk Supply Infrastructure Task Group Scoping Paper, which was attached to the brief for this consultancy. Consequently, the consultant is to: Acquire and review existing information on previous investigations; and, Prepare and submit to the Project Officer, a Report (the BSI04 Report) summarising the Infrastructure Options identified from a review of the existing reports and information, with recommendations on which warrant further 41/14840/333302 South East Queensland Regional Water Supply Strategy 1 Bulk Supply Infrastructure Task Group Desk Top Review and TOR Development Consultancy consideration, and identification of the further investigation required to firm up the information on these sites. The initial scoping report is the first report in a series of reports with the overall objective to: Identify possible infrastructure options to improve water supply including: – New dams and weirs; – Existing dams or weirs that could be raised; – The associated delivery infrastructure; and, Determine which of the identified infrastructure options warrants detailed investigations and eliminate all others from further consideration. Each of the previous studies is to be evaluated to identify any major gaps in information on aspects such as environmental impact, cultural heritage or foundation conditions giving particular attention to the identification of potential “show stoppers”. A report (the BSI04 Report) is to be submitted to the Project Officer incorporating the following: The costs associated with the development of selected sites to a range of capacities, including land acquisitions and modifications to infrastructure such as roads and powerlines. The costs are also to be shown in schedules including quantities, unit rates and allowances for overheads and contingencies. Plans showing arrangements of structures, relocations, resumption areas etc are also to be provided; Recommendations on further studies (including costs and timelines) necessary to assess potential “show stoppers”. These recommendations will also be provided progressively in a series of interim reports and will lead to the preparation of TORs for work under BSI 05; Recommendations on the infrastructure necessary to connect the storages to the regional network (identified in broad terms) together with preliminary cost estimates of pipelines and water treatment; Recommendations on the infrastructure necessary to connect the storages to the regional network in broad terms together with preliminary cost estimates of pipelines and water treatment; and, TORs for BSI 05 provided progressively. In addition an oral presentation of the findings will be made to the Bulk Supply Infrastructure Task Group and the Strategy Management Group on completion of the task. 41/14840/333302 South East Queensland Regional Water Supply Strategy 2 Bulk Supply Infrastructure Task Group Desk Top Review and TOR Development Consultancy 2. Proposed Scope of Works 2.1 BSI 04 Desk Top Review of Identified Dam and Weir Sites Subject to approval of the Initial Scoping Report by the BSI Task Group, a more detailed review of the existing Investigation Reports and Preliminary Designs will be undertaken and the costs will be updated on a common basis. This may require some new desktop preliminary design where modification from previous arrangements is desirable, or where existing information was insufficient. Some desk top preliminary design may also be required for the delivery infrastructure on an individual basis recognising that water demand and points of delivery will not be fully understood. After screening to determine the sites with the greatest potential, a range of capacities will be assessed to determine the upper limit for development at each of the sites. Whilst this upper limit may result in a higher cost per megalitre than an alternative the marginal cost may be less than the marginal cost of the next alternative. At least two capacities are to be investigated at each site: the nominated capacity and the upper limit. The tasks to be undertaken include: Identify all the sites to be considered in the desktop review. The BSI Task Group Scoping Document attached to the brief for this consultancy suggested that this is likely to amount to five or six new dam sites, three potential raisings and up to four weir sites, though the brief itself and review of existing reports to date have suggested an increased number of sites will need to be considered; A review of the infrastructure projects nominated by the Steering Committee Workshop 27th January 05; Review of the existing documents on previous investigations including the cost estimates and identify shortfalls; Review any previous assessments of environmental and cultural heritage impacts. Carry out additional desktop studies where appropriate in order to develop an appreciation of whether potential impacts may affect the likelihood of the proposal proceeding and identify those sites unlikely to be developed due to social or environmental impacts; Prepare updated cost estimates based on the available information and form an appreciation of the accuracy of the estimates, for those projects that might be considered further in the development of the RWSS; Identify in broad terms the infrastructure necessary to connect the storages to the regional network; Prepare preliminary estimates of the costs of this connecting infrastructure and water treatment; 41/14840/333302 South East Queensland Regional Water Supply Strategy 3 Bulk Supply Infrastructure Task Group Desk Top Review and TOR Development Consultancy For competing options, for example, alternative weir sites on a river or alternative pipeline routes, determine which is preferable considering cost, supply and impact criteria; Prepare a list of options that appear to be feasible and preferred; Prepare, following consultation with the BSI Task Group, for each site included in this program, a schedule of additional (pre-feasibility level) studies required to confirm that the project warrants detailed investigation, including estimated costs of the studies; Prepare a risk management assessment for each site/project in the context of it being struck off the list or included for further consideration; 41/14840/333302 South East Queensland Regional Water Supply Strategy 4 Bulk Supply Infrastructure Task Group Desk Top Review and TOR Development Consultancy 3. Identification and Collation of Sites/Projects 3.1 Sources of Information A review of the following documents indicated that there have been a large number of dam and weir sites considered to supplement the raw water supply in the South East Queensland region. The documents reviewed included: 1. JWP, “Future Water Source Options for the Sunshine Coast” Table 16.1(draft), Aquagen, July 2005; 2. 27th January 2005 RWSS Steering Committee Workshop minutes; 3. Sunwater, “Water Supply Study of the Upper Mary Valley – Security of Supply”, August 2004; 4.
Recommended publications
  • Lin-Et-Al-2018.Pdf
    Received: 20 February 2017 Revised: 13 July 2017 Accepted: 17 July 2017 DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2831 RESEARCH ARTICLE Impacts of fishing, river flow and connectivity loss on the conservation of a migratory fish population Hsien‐Yung Lin1 | Christopher J. Brown2 | Ross G. Dwyer3 | Doug J. Harding4 | David T. Roberts5 | Richard A. Fuller1 | Simon Linke2 | Hugh P. Possingham1 1 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, The Abstract University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 1. Migratory species depend on connected habitats and appropriate migratory cues to complete Australia their life cycles. Diadromous fish exemplify species with migratory life cycles by moving 2 The Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith between connected freshwater and saltwater habitats to reproduce. However, migration University, Nathan, QLD, Australia increases the exposure of fish to multiple threats and it is critical that managers integrate hab- 3 School of Biological Sciences, The University itat connectivity into resource management and conservation. of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia 4 Department of Natural Resources and Mines, 2. The benefit of alternative management actions was assessed for a diadromous fish, the Landcentre, Woolloongabba, Australia Australian bass Percalates novemaculeata, using a spatio‐temporal population model informed 5 Seqwater, Ipswich, QLD, Australia by individual‐based movement data. The management actions comprise seasonal closures Correspondence during the spawning season, and controlling fishing pressure by limiting catch or effort. Hsien‐Yung Lin, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological 3. The benefits of implementing seasonal closures depend upon interactions among how fishing Sciences, The University of Queensland, St pressure is controlled, the response of anglers to fishery regulations and river flow regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyaralong Dam: Issues and Alternatives
    Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives Issues associated with the proposed construction of a dam on the Teviot Brook, South East Queensland 2nd edition October 2006 Report prepared by Dr G Bradd Witt and Katherine Witt The proposed Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives 2nd edition October 2006 Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives Issues associated with the proposed construction of a dam on the Teviot Brook, South East Queensland 2nd Edition October 2006 Report prepared by Dr G Bradd Witt and Katherine Witt - 1 - The proposed Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives 2nd edition October 2006 Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................. i 1.0 Executive summary ................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Key issues identified in this report ........................................ 2 1.3 Alternative proposition ........................................................ 3 2.0 Introduction and context............................................................ 5 2.1 The Wyaralong District ........................................................ 5 2.2 The Teviot Catchment ......................................................... 5 3.0 Key issues of concern ................................................................ 7 3.1 Catchment yield and dam yield ............................................ 7 3.2 Water quality...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water for Life Your Say on South East Queensland's Water Future
    Your say on South East Queensland’s water future Water for life 2015 – 2045 A Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority, trading as Seqwater. ABN: 75 450 239 876 Level 8 117 Brisbane Street, Ipswich QLD 4305 PO Box 16146 City East QLD 4002 P 1800 771 497 F +61 7 3229 7926 E [email protected] W seqwater.com.au Translation and interpreting assistance Seqwater is committed to providing accessible services to people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Please contact us and we will arrange an interpreter to share this publication with you. ISBN-13:978-0-9943790-1-6 © Seqwater 2015 This publication is correct at time of writing and is subject to change. B Water for life Water gives and sustains life. It supports healthy communities and a prosperous South East Queensland (SEQ). It is an essential service that is delivered to 3.1 million people across our region every day. As the region’s bulk water supply authority, we are committed to water for life. We are charged with delivering safe, secure and cost-effective water and catchment services to our customers and communities today and in the future. In SEQ we live in a climate of extremes – from times of drought to floods – and we need to be ready to adjust our water use and management when conditions change. Our research tells us that apart from a severe drought or a sharp increase in demand, we have enough water to supply our region for about 15 years. But after that, we will need new water sources to meet growing demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Leslie Harrison Dam Emergency Action Plan
    LESLIE HARRISON DAM EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN Expires: 1 August 2023 September 2020 Leslie Harrison Dam Emergency Action Plan QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Emergency Condition Level Dam Hazard Alert Lean Forward Stand Up Stand Down Flood Event (Section Reservoir level equal to or Flood of Record: Reservoir Extreme Flood Level: Reservoir Level below Full 7.1) greater than 15.24m AHD and level equal to or greater than Reservoir level equal to or Supply Level of 15.24m AHD BoM expected to issue Flood 18.62m AHD greater than 21.00m AHD Warnings across SEQ. Significant Increase in Earthquake of Magnitude 3 or Seepage is increasing or earth Dam failure is considered Seepage through the Dam is Seepage or New Area of higher detected in the vicinity material evident in the possible via an identified controlled and; Seepage (Section 7.2) of the Dam or; seepage is increasing and; failure mechanism. No indicators of potential Dam Significant new or increased The increases cannot be failure are present. seepage areas identified at the controlled. Dam or; Seepage areas containing earth material identified at the Dam. Structural Damage to Earthquake of Magnitude 3 or A Terrorist Threat or Incident is New structural damage or Dam embankment is stable Dam (Section 7.3) higher detected in the vicinity reported at the Dam Site or; movement areas indicate and; of the Dam or; some potential for a structural New structural damage or No potential indicators of failure of the Dam. New structural damage or movement areas have not potential Dam failure are movement areas identified at stabilised and are present.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Rivers Fact Sheet
    FACT SHEET Resilient Rivers Initiative The Council of Mayors (SEQ) Resilient Rivers Within the catchment, the Mid-Logan reach between Initiative is a collaborative program to improve the Cedar Grove Weir and Beaudesert has been health and resilience of South East Queensland’s identified as an area that would benefit from focused catchments, rivers and Moreton Bay. riparian restoration and protection. Logan-Albert Catchment Action Plan Landholders are supported with riverbank restoration achieved through weed management, revegetation, The Logan-Albert Catchment Action Plan (CAP) gully stabilisation, stock fencing and off-stream identifies the high risk of sediment movement from watering. the catchment and its downstream impact on the Logan and Albert Rivers and Moreton Bay. These actions are funded by the Resilient Rivers Initiative through pooled funding contributed by A goal of the action plan is to keep soil on our land member councils of the Council of Mayors (SEQ). and out of our waterways to support agricultural This includes Logan City Council and Scenic Rim productivity and improve water quality. Regional Council. Priority reach Collaborations Successful delivery of Resilient Rivers outcomes in the Logan-Albert catchment depends on strong collaboration between Logan and Scenic Rim councils, landholders and relevant entities working across the catchment. To better coordinate this collaboration, the Resilient Rivers Initiative also funds a Catchment Management Officer who works across council boundaries to deliver outcomes. Collaboration
    [Show full text]
  • Logan River Water Supply Scheme
    Logan River Water Supply Scheme Scheme submission to QCA 2020-21 to 2023-24 Submitted: 30 November 2018 Contents Section Title Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Review context ........................................................................................................ 3 2. Scheme Details ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Scheme background and context ............................................................................ 3 2.2 Infrastructure details ................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Customer service standards .................................................................................... 3 2.4 Customers and water entitlements serviced ............................................................ 4 2.5 Water availability and use ....................................................................................... 4 2.5.1 Water availability ..................................................................................................... 4 2.5.2 Water use ................................................................................................................ 4 3. Irrigation Customer Consultation ............................................................................. 5 3.1 Reference group feedback .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wyralong DAH\DRG\ECO 040806 RE.WOR
    Wyaralong Dam Initial Advice Statement Offices Brisbane Denver Karratha Melbourne Prepared For: Queensland Water Infrastructure Pty Ltd Morwell Newcastle Perth Prepared By: WBM Pty Ltd (Member of the BMT group of companies) Sydney Vancouver N:\WYARALONG\EIS\IAS\WYARALONG.DRAFT IAS (V3) - FINAL.DOC 19/9/06 08:09 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET WBM Pty Ltd Brisbane Office: Document : Document1 WBM Pty Ltd Level 11, 490 Upper Edward Street SPRING HILL QLD 4004 Project Manager : David Houghton Australia PO Box 203 Spring Hill QLD 4004 Telephone (07) 3831 6744 Client : Queensland Water Infrastructure Facsimile (07) 3832 3627 Pty Ltd www.wbmpl.com.au Lee Benson ABN 54 010 830 421 002 Client Contact: Client Reference Title : Wyaralong Dam Initial Advice Statement Author : David Houghton, Darren Richardson Synopsis : Initial Advice Statement for the EIS for the proposed Wyaralong Dam on Teviot Brook, located in the Logan River catchment. REVISION/CHECKING HISTORY REVISION DATE OF ISSUE CHECKED BY ISSUED BY NUMBER 0 26 August 2006 D Richardson D Houghton 1 5 September 2006 D Richardson D Houghton DISTRIBUTION DESTINATION REVISION 0 1 2 3 QWI 1* 1* WBM File 1 1 WBM Library PDF PDF N:\WYARALONG\EIS\IAS\WYARALONG.DRAFT IAS (V3) - FINAL.DOC 19/9/06 08:09 I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Wyaralong Dam project involves the construction of a new dam on Teviot Brook (14.8 km AMTD), a tributary of the Logan River in Southeast Queensland (SEQ). The dam will be located approximately 14.2 km north-west of Beaudesert and 50.6 km south south-west of Brisbane.
    [Show full text]
  • Rising to the Challenge
    Rising to the challenge Annual Report 2010-11 14 September 2011 This Annual Report provides information about the financial and non-financial performance of Seqwater for 2010-11. The Hon Stephen Robertson MP It has been prepared in accordance with the Financial Minister for Energy and Water Utilities Accountability Act 2009, the Financial and Performance PO Box 15216 Management Standard 2009 and the Annual Report City East QLD 4002 Guidelines for Queensland Government Agencies. This Report records the significant achievements The Hon Rachel Nolan MP against the strategies and activities detailed in the Minister for Finance, Natural Resources and the Arts organisation’s strategic and operational plans. GPO Box 611 This Report has been prepared for the Minister for Brisbane QLD 4001 Energy and Water Utilities to submit to Parliament. It has also been prepared to meet the needs of Seqwater’s customers and stakeholders, which include the Federal and local governments, industry Dear Ministers and business associations and the community. 2010-11 Seqwater Annual Report This Report is publically available and can be viewed I am pleased to present the Annual Report 2010-11 for and downloaded from the Seqwater website at the Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority, trading www.seqwater.com.au/public/news-publications/ as Seqwater. annual-reports. I certify that this Annual Report meets the prescribed Printed copies are available from Seqwater’s requirements of the Financial Accountability Act 2009 registered office. and the Financial and Performance Management Standard 2009 particularly with regard to reporting Contact the Authority’s objectives, functions, performance and governance arrangements. Queensland Bulk Water Authority, trading as Seqwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Traveston Crossing
    PO Box 201, BEAUDESERT QLD 4285 Mobile: 0407 699 054 Email: [email protected] Web: www.larcweb.org ABN : 49 522 998 528 . The Secretary Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 04 April 2007 Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Inquiry into Additional Water Supplies for South East Queensland – Wyaralong Dam Proposal This submission is made by the Executive of the Logan and Albert Rivers Catchment Association Inc (LARC) on behalf of LARC. The Executive is comprised of members with extensive experience in catchment management and detailed understanding of the science and issues associated with the Logan and Albert catchment. Members of the Executive Chair of Logan & Albert Task Force auspiced under the SEQ Healthy Waterways Partnership and represent the catchment on the Southern Implementation Groups and Community & Industry Advisory Group managed by the SEQ Healthy Waterway Partnership. The members of the Executive have strong work experience, training, qualifications and representative roles across community, industry and professional environmental management sectors. Based on flawed Logan Basin Water Resource Plan The Wyaralong Dam proposal is based upon a modelled surplus of water in the Logan River basin at the Cedar Grove Weir. This surplus is asserted by the Queensland Government in the technical reports prepared for the Water Resource (Logan Basin) Plan 2007. The data used in the modelling for the water resource plan relies upon inaccurate data to make this assessment. LARC provided a detailed submission regarding these flawed assumptions upon the release of the draft Logan Basin Water Resource plan (see attachment 1). The key relevant points from this submission for the purposes of this inquiry are: • The past 10 years of the rainfall record are significantly drier than at any time in the preceding 100 years of rainfall data.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Dam
    ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA ENGINEERING HERITAGE AUSTRALIA HERITAGE RECOGNITION PROGRAM Nomination Document for THE SOMERSET DAM BCC Image BCC-C54-16 Somerset Region South-east Queensland January 2010 Table of Contents Nomination Form .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 2 Letter of support: ................................................................................................................................... 3 Location Maps ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Heritage Assessment 1. BASIC DATA ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Statement of Significance:.............................................................................................................. 6 Proposed wording for interpretation panel .......................................................................................... 9 Appendix A: Paper by Geoffrey Cossins............................................................................................... 10 References .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Science Forum and Stakeholder Engagement Booklet
    Urban Water Security Research Alliance Science Forum and Stakeholder Engagement Building Linkages, Collaboration and Science Quality 28-29 September 2010 Brisbane, Queensland Program and Abstracts UWSRA Science Forum and Stakeholder Engagement – Program and Abstracts ISSN 1839-1230 (Print) UWSRA Science Forum and Stakeholder Engagement – Program and Abstracts ISSN 1839-1249 (Online) The Urban Water Security Research Alliance (UWSRA) is a $50 million partnership over five years between the Queensland Government, CSIRO’s Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, Griffith University and The University of Queensland. The Alliance has been formed to address South-East Queensland's emerging urban water issues with a focus on water security and recycling. The program will bring new research capacity to South-East Queensland tailored to tackling existing and anticipated future issues to inform the implementation of the Water Strategy. For more information about the: UWSRA - visit http://www.urbanwateralliance.org.au/ Queensland Government - visit http://www.qld.gov.au/ Water for a Healthy Country Flagship - visit www.csiro.au/org/HealthyCountry.html The University of Queensland - visit http://www.uq.edu.au/ Griffith University - visit http://www.griffith.edu.au/ Enquiries should be addressed to: The Urban Water Security Research Alliance PO Box 15087 CITY EAST QLD 4002 Ph: 07-3247 3005; Fax: 07- 3405 3556 Email: [email protected] Begbie, D.K. and Wakem, S.L. (eds) (2010), Science Forum and Stakeholder Engagement: Building Linkages, Collaboration and Science Quality, Urban Water Security Research Alliance, 28-29 September, Brisbane, Queensland. Copyright © 2010 CSIRO To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Capital and Operating Expenditure Final
    Seqwater Irrigation Price Review 2013-2017 Assessment of Capital and Operating Expenditure FINAL December 2012 Seqwater Irrigation Price Review 2013- 2017 ASSESSMENT OF CAPITAL AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE Rev 6 Final 12 December 2012 Sinclair Knight Merz ABN 37 001 024 095 Cnr of Cordelia and Russell Street South Brisbane QLD 4101 Australia PO Box 3848 South Brisbane QLD 4101 Australia Tel: +61 7 3026 7100 Fax: +61 7 3026 7300 Web: www.skmconsulting.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Sinclair Knight Merz constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo trade mark is a registered trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Contents 1. Executive summary 6 1.1. Introduction and background 6 1.2. Policy and procedure review 6 1.3. Capital expenditure 7 1.4. Operational Expenditure 12 2. Introduction 18 2.1. Terms of reference 18 2.2. Report overview 19 3. Background 20 3.1. Seqwater 20 3.2. The role of the Authority 22 3.3.
    [Show full text]