Reporting Centre Sexual Abuse Within the Roman Catholic Church in The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Reporting Centre Sexual Abuse within the Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands Netherlands the in Church Catholic Roman the Abuse within Sexual Centre Reporting Reporting Centre Sexual Abuse Report on activities 2011-2018 within the Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands Report on activities 2011-2018 Reporting Centre Sexual Abuse within the Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands Reporting Centre Report on activities 2011-2018 Victim Support Platform Complaints Committee Compensation Committee Contents Organisational structure 5 Timeline 6 Summary 9 Foreword 13 1 From Help & Justice to Reporting Centre 17 2 Report of the Board 21 3 Reporting Centre Sexual Abuse within the Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands 39 4 Victim Support Platform 47 5 The Complaints Committee 59 6 Compensation Committee 73 7 Finances 85 8 Stories from practice 89 Appendices 117 3 This is a publication of the Management and Monitoring Foundation on Sexual Abuse within the Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands Editors: Liesbeth Sanders and Ben Spekman, Reporting Centre Sexual Abuse within the Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands Layout: Désirée Meulenkamp, Libertas Pascal Printer: Libertas Pascal, Utrecht www.meldpuntmisbruikrkk@nl Organisational structure Management and Monitoring Foundation Reporting Centre Victim Support Complaints Compensation Platform Committee Committee 4 5 TIMELINE TIMELINE Timeline recognition and reparation solely for victims of violence. This decision ensues from publi- cation of the report of the Deetman Commission’s follow-up inquiry into violence against girls, on 11 March 2013. 1995 Establishment by the church of Help & Justice (Hulp & Recht), a body for victims of sexual 2013 On 7 July, members of the House of Representatives’ Standing Committee on Security and abuse within the Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands. Justice visit the Reporting Centre. They include the (later Minister of Justice) Ard van der Steur. With the consent of victims, some members of parliament will later attend hearings 2010 A stream of complaints from victims of sexual abuse within the Catholic Church in the of the Complaints Committee. Netherlands follows the publication of reports by NRC Handelsblad and the Wereldomroep (the Dutch world broadcasting service) on 26 February. Practically all of the cases are bar- 2013 On 5 November, the chairmen of the Conference of Bishops, the Conference of Dutch Reli- red from action under criminal and civil law by the statute of limitations. gious and the Koepel Landelijk Overleg Kerkelijk Kindermisbruik (KLOKK) (Cardinal Eijk, Brother Van Dam and Mr. Klabbers, respectively) present a report on the current status of 2010 On 9 March, the Conference of Bishops and the Conference of Dutch Religious initiate an measures to address sexual abuse in the Catholic Church to Minister of Security and Justice independent inquiry by a commission chaired by former minister and Speaker of the Dutch Ivo Opstelten. This so-called ‘baseline measurement’ was written by Mr. René Westra. House of Representatives, Wim Deetman. 2013 Because of the decline in the number of complaints, at the end of the year the Conference 2010 On 9 December, the Deetman Commission publishes an interim report, calling mainly for of Bishops and the Conference of Dutch Religious establish a deadline of 1 July 2014 for the reorganisation of Help & Justice. The Conference of Bishops and the Conference of submitting complaints. Dutch Religious decide to delegate implementation of the recommendation to a commit- tee chaired by Mr. Ronald Bandell, a former mayor of Dordrecht. 2014 The victims’ organisation Women’s Platform for Child Abuse in the Catholic Church (Vrouwen Platform Kerkelijk Kindermisbruik, VPKK) institutes legal proceedings against 2011 On 24 June, the Bandell Commission recommends the establishment of an independent the closing date for submitting claims of 1 July 2014. On 12 October, the court rules that 6 Reporting Centre for Sexual Abuse of Minors within the Roman Catholic Church, with a the deadline must be extended to 1 May 2015. 7 Victim Support Platform, a Complaints Committee and a Compensation Committee. Oversight is to be exercised by an independent body, the Management and Monitoring 2015 On 1 May, the Conference of Bishops and the Conference of Dutch Religious establish a Foundation on Sexual Abuse within the Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands (Stich Reporting Centre for Transgressional Behaviour. New cases of abuse of minors will conti- ting Beheer en Toezicht). The Board of the foundation is chaired by Ms. Karla Peijs, former nue to be reported to the police. The Reporting Centre is intended for transgressional Queen’s Commissioner in Zeeland (until 1 July 2014); its secretary is Mr. Rob van de Beeten behaviour not covered by criminal law. (chairman from 1 July 2014); and its treasurer is Mr. Ton Peek. (Mr. Jan Brenninkmeijer joins the Board as secretary from 15 January 2015.) 2015 On 12 October, the Conference of Bishops and the Conference of Dutch Religious adopt rules for a ‘final action’ for victims whose complaints were initially declared unfounded, 2011 On 20 June, the Lindenbergh Commission publishes the compensation scheme that has been but were believed to be authentic. drawn up on behalf of the Conference of Bishops and the Conference of Dutch Religious. 2016 On 26 June, Mr. Deetman publishes his final monitoring report on five years of activities 2011 On 16 December, the Deetman Commission publishes the report ‘Sexual Abuse of Minors on behalf of victims of sexual abuse. The report is discussed for the first time with the in the Roman Catholic Church’. House of Representatives’ Standing Committee on Security and Justice on 30 June, with the hearing being completed on 14 December. 2012 On 28 September, the former Deetman Commission publishes its first monitoring report, One of the subjects discussed is the issue of the archives. Minister Van der Steur promises which is discussed on 28 March 2013 in the House of Representatives’ Standing Committee to look for a comprehensive solution in consultation with the relevant parties. on Security and Justice. 2017 The Roman Catholic Church agrees with the government that it will treat any later reports 2013 On 28 March, the Standing Committee on Security and Justice holds a hearing in the seriously and will continue to offer support for victims. House of Representatives on Mr. Deetman’s first monitoring report, of 28 September 2012. Representatives of the church and of victim groups come face to face. After the meeting, 2017 In the autumn, a framework regulation governing the archives relating to victims of sexual agreements are made for regular consultation. The House of Representatives decides to abuse in the Catholic Church is published. monitor progress closely (in response to a motion by MP Ard van der Steur). 2018 In January, the Reporting Centre for Sexual Abuse within the Roman Catholic Church in 2013 The Commission for Help, Recognition and Reparation for violence against minors in the the Netherlands closes. The Victim Support Platform continues to assist victims under the Roman Catholic Church (HEG Commissie) is established with responsibility for arranging auspices of the Reporting Centre for Transgressional Behaviour. Summary Summary Victims of sexual abuse within the Catholic Church received recognition For the most part, victims of sexual abuse all parties.’ And one of the chairpersons of the regarding the Catholic Church in our country hearings, Lieke de Rijke-Maas, says: ‘I was not have received recognition and reparation, the the only one who had difficulty absorbing the Board of the Management and Monitoring nature and scale of the abuse in the beginning. Foundation on Sexual Abuse within the Roman The representatives of the Catholic Church also Catholic Church in the Netherlands (hereinafter: struggled with it, although it was evident that Management and Monitoring Foundation or the comment ‘Wir haben es nicht gewusst’ could Foundation) concludes in a report on its activi- not be true. Although I am willing to assume ties during the period 2011-2018. The report that the scale of the abuse and the enormous covers the activities of the Reporting Centre impact it had on the victims was not immediate- 9 Sexual Abuse within the Roman Catholic Church ly apparent to everyone, individuals were trans- in the Netherlands, the Victim Support Platform, ferred because of so-called ‘improper behaviour’ the Complaints Committee and the Compensati- and it was known that there had been criminal on Committee. convictions. ‘Have we met the expectations of the The Board feels that the employees deserve victims?’ In the opinion of the Board, the answer credit for ‘offering the victims the path to the to that question has to be given by the victims. recognition, reparation and help they so fervent- ‘Nevertheless, we dare to say in response to this ly desired’. The final report describes in detail key question: in general, yes. We base that how difficult that path sometimes proved to be. answer on the reactions of victims, particularly There was, particularly in the beginning, insuffi- after the hearing by the Complaints Committee, cient experience in this specific domain. the feedback from groups representing victims and the observations of members of the House of Representatives who attended hearings.’ Deetman Commission The Board finds that this answer to the key question is in itself a tribute to the employees of At the beginning of 2010, a flood of reports the Reporting Centre, some of whom provide of abuse within the church followed publicity in moving testimony of their experiences in the NRC Handelsblad and by the Wereldomroep. The final report. In the final report of the Complaints church’s agency Help & Justice (Hulp & Recht) Committee, for example, the registrar, Sophie was not equipped to handle the volume and was Roos-Bollen, says: ‘Recording so much grief and forced to improvise in order to provide help for misery so clinically on paper was not always easy, victims, so the Conference of Bishops and the but it was our task as Complaints Committee to Conference of Dutch Religious asked the Deet- make the correct decision.