Promoting Positivity, Refuting Negativity, Or Remaining Neutral?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Promoting Positivity, Refuting Negativity, Or Remaining Neutral? Promoting Positivity, Refuting Negativity, or Remaining Neutral? Language Use in Select Issues of The Homosexual Citizen and Eastern Mattachine Magazine By Zach Baldwin Andrea Brenner, Department of Sociology General University Honors May 2014 American University Washington, DC 2 Dedication To Frank Kameny, Jack Nichols, Lilli Vincenz, Barbara Gittings, and the many other members of the early gay rights movement in the United States. Without your sacrifices our community would not be where it is today. Thank you. To Bob Connelly for peeking my interest in the early gay rights movement and for being a constant source of friendship and advice – I owe you some Navratan Korma. 3 Abstract The gay rights movement in the United States truly began with the conclusion of World War II when returning GIs who identified as gay, or had gay inclinations, met one another and took the opportunity to begin exploring their sexuality. This research examines the messaging and language used during the early days of the gay rights movement in the United States. Specifically, this work examines how the DC Mattachine Society spoke to their constituents and focuses on the tone used. As such, this research asks the following questions: What language did the DC Mattachine Society use in these publications to communicate with their members? Were the messages about homosexuality conveyed in these publications primarily refuting negativity, promoting positivity, or neutral? Did certain topics tend to lean towards one type of message or were they varied? The data for this research was drawn from a content analysis of select issues of Eastern Mattachine Magazine and The Homosexual Citizen, two publications released by the DC Mattachine Society, from 1965 to 1967. The most significant finding to come out of this research is the strong focus on neutrality across each of the publications examined. Many articles approached the topic at hand in an almost scientific manner that provided straight facts more than advocacy-type articles full of emotion. This ran counter to expectations at the start of this research. 4 Table of Contents Dedication · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 2 Abstract · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 3 Introduction · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 5 Literature Review and Theoretical Framework · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8 Insider/Outsider Dynamics · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8 Language of the Other · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 9 Influence of Language on the Understanding of Identity · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·10 Research Methodology · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 11 Operational Definitions · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·11 Preliminary Research Design · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·12 Sampling Considerations · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·12 Strengths and Weaknesses of Methodology · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 13 Guides and Content · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·14 Results and Analysis · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·15 Types of Content · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 15 Positivity, Negativity, and Neutrality · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·16 Positivity, Negativity, and Neutrality by Types of Content · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 17 Conclusion · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 20 Appendices · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 22 References · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·32 5 Introduction The Gay Rights Movement in the United States is commonly assumed to have begun with the Stonewall Riots in June of 1969.1 While this event was a catalyst for increased activism and demands for equal rights, it is not the first action by gay and lesbian activists in the United States. Arguments can be made for gay rights activism taking place at the beginning of the 19th century, but those instances of activism are few and not widely impactful. Rather, an important period to study is that which led up to the Stonewall Riots and made such an act of resistance successful and possible in the first place. Of note are actions taken by the Mattachine Society of Washington, DC, under the leadership of Dr. Frank Kameny, between its founding in 1961 leading up to the Stonewall Riot in June of 1969. The Washington, DC chapter of the Mattachine Society was co-founded by Dr. Franklin E. Kameny and Jack Nichols on November 15, 1961 (The Rainbow History Project n.d.). According to the Statement of Purpose released by the organization, the Mattachine Society of DC was formed in order to: “Secure for homosexuals the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness…to equalize the status and position of the homosexual with those of the heterosexual…to inform and enlighten the public about homosexuals and homosexuality…to assist, protect, and counsel the homosexual in need” (Mattachine Society of Washington DC 1961). The Statement of Purpose also makes it clear that the Mattachine Society is not a social organization and that they will willingly cooperate with other civil rights groups. The Mattachine Society of DC was a membership organization that screened members and was governed by an 1 The Stonewall Riots occurred on June 28th when a group of gay customers at the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village, NY fought back against the police harassment that happened regularly at the time. In 1969 in New York and elsewhere throughout the country there were laws prohibiting homosexuality in public and many gay establishments were continually raised and shut down. The police beat back the protestors on the first night, but on June 29th the riot resurrected with an even larger crowd. Demonstrations continued throughout the week. (The Leadership Conference 2009). 6 executive board (The Rainbow History Project n.d.). The organization released monthly publications, organized lawful demonstrations, lobbied government officials, and provided support for homosexuals in the area and across the country. Among other things, this period included: the first civil rights claim to the Supreme Court on the basis of sexual orientation (Franklin Edward Kameny, Petitioner v. Wilber M. Brucker, Secretary of the Army, et al., Respondents, 1960), the first picket line in front of the White House advocating for gay rights, efforts to overturn sodomy laws, and more (Gaynair 2009). Throughout this time, gay rights activists had to combat strong social stigma and negative cultural beliefs about homosexuality. As such, Kameny and the Mattachine Society had to be very careful and calculating about the language they used to express their beliefs and fight for their rights. Today, many primary documents from Frank Kameny and the Washington, DC chapter of the Mattachine Society are publically available through the Library of Congress and the Smithsonian Museum, however little research has been conducted to directly analyze the language used during the first decade of the organization’s operation, or studied how that language has changed over time. It is important to conduct this research in order to help give a voice to the history of the gay rights movement. All too often, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender aspects of history are left out of the public record. This history is not taught at public schools and is rarely a topic of discussion outside specific academic circles. Through a content analysis, this research examined the questions: What language did the DC Mattachine Society use in these publications to communicate with their members? Were the messages about homosexuality conveyed in these publications primarily refuting negativity, 7 promoting positivity, or neutral? Did certain topics tend to lean towards one type of message or were they varied? 8 Literature Review and Theoretical Framework Before delving deeper into this topic, it is necessary to review some relevant literature and theory, most notable the dynamics of insider/outsider relations; the language of the ‘other’; and the influence of language on the understanding of identity. Insider/Outsider Dynamics The terms ‘insider’ and ‘outsider’ in this context refer to the position of the researcher in relation to his or her research subjects. It has primarily been used to inform the interactions of interviews; however it is also applicable to a researcher studying primary source documents from the past and can help foster a better understanding of the subjects under study. Early discussions of insider/outsider dynamics assumed that the research could only fit into one or the other category (Merriam and Johnson-Bailey 2010, 405). The common thought
Recommended publications
  • Barbara Gittings and Kay Tobin Lahusen Collection, 1950-2009 [Bulk: 1964-1975] : Ms.Coll.3
    Barbara Gittings and Kay Tobin Lahusen collection, 1950-2009 [Bulk: 1964-1975] : Ms.Coll.3 Finding aid prepared by Alina Josan on 2015 PDF produced on July 17, 2019 John J. Wilcox, Jr. LGBT Archives, William Way LGBT Community Center 1315 Spruce Street Philadelphia, PA 19107 [email protected] Barbara Gittings and Kay Tobin Lahusen collection, 1950-2009 [Bulk: 1964-1975] : Ms.Coll.3 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical ................................................................................................................................ 4 Scope and Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 7 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 8 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Subject files ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Frank: a Life in Politics from the Great Society to Same-Sex Marriage by Barney Frank
    National Museum of American Jewish History Quarterly Members & Docents Book Club Frank: A Life in Politics from the Great Society to Same-Sex Marriage by Barney Frank Discussed at NMAJH on August 31, 2015 Barnett "Barney" Frank (born March 31, 1940) is an American politician who served as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Massachusetts from 1981 to 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee (2007–2011) and was a leading co-sponsor of the 2010 Dodd–Frank Act, a sweeping reform of the U.S. financial industry. Frank, a resident of Newton, Massachusetts, is considered the most prominent gay politician in the United States. (Wikipedia) Franklin Edward "Frank" Kameny (May 21, 1925 – October 11, 2011) was an American gay rights activist. In 1957, Kameny was dismissed from his position as an astronomer in the U.S. Army's Army Map Service in Washington, D.C. because of his homosexuality, leading him to begin "a Herculean struggle with the American establishment" that would "spearhead a new period of militancy in the homosexual rights movement of the early 1960s". He has been referred to as "one of the most significant figures" in the American gay rights movement. (Wikipedia) See Page 166 in Frank. Discussion Questions: 1. The autobiography opens with Barney noting a dramatic turnabout from 1954 to 2014. Government went from high esteem to low esteem; gay rights went in the reverse order. Do you agree or not? Why? 2. Could the same observation apply to Jewish politicians? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spark of Stonewall
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by James Madison University James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Proceedings of the Sixth Annual MadRush MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference Conference: Best Papers, Spring 2015 A Movement on the Verge: The pS ark of Stonewall Tiffany Renee Nelson James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/madrush Part of the Social History Commons Tiffany Renee Nelson, "A Movement on the Verge: The pS ark of Stonewall" (April 10, 2015). MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference. Paper 1. http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/madrush/2015/SocialMovements/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conference Proceedings at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Movement on the Verge: The Spark of Stonewall The night of Saturday, June 28, 1969, the streets of Central Greenwich Village were crowded with angered gay men, lesbians, “flame queens”, and Trans*genders. 1 That was the second day of disorder of what would later be called the Stonewall Riots. Centering around Christopher Street’s bar for homosexuals, the Stonewall Inn, the riots began the night before on June 27 and lasted until July 2. These five days of rioting were the result of decades of disdain against the police force and the general population that had oppressed the gay inhabitants of New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Nichols, Gay Pioneer “Have You Heard My Message?” Jack Nichols, Gay Pioneer “Have You Heard My Message?”
    Jack Nichols, Gay Pioneer “Have You Heard My Message?” Jack Nichols, Gay Pioneer “Have You Heard My Message?” J. Louis Campbell III New York London First published by Harrington Park Press® the trade divsion of The Haworth Press, Inc., 10 Alice Street, Binghamton, NY 13904-1580. This edition published 2012 by Routledge Routledge Routledge Taylor & Farncis Group Taylor & Farncis Group 711 Third Avenue 2 Park Square, Milton Park New York, NY 10017 Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN © 2007 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilm, and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. PUBLISHER’S NOTE The development, preparation, and publication of this work has been undertaken with great care. However, the Publisher, employees, editors, and agents of The Haworth Press are not responsible for any errors contained herein or for consequences that may ensue from use of materials or information contained in this work. The Haworth Press is committed to the dissemination of ideas and information according to the highest standards of intellectual freedom and the free exchange of ideas. Statements made and opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the Publisher, Directors, management, or staff of The Haworth Press, Inc., or an endorsement by them. Cover design by Marylouise E. Doyle. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Campbell, J. Louis, PhD Jack Nichols, gay pioneer : have you heard my message? / J.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Sexual Orientation? Mary Ziegler Florida State University College of Law
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 106 | Issue 1 Article 6 2018 What is Sexual Orientation? Mary Ziegler Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Ziegler, Mary (2018) "What is Sexual Orientation?," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 106 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol106/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What is Sexual Orientation? Mary ZieglerI ABSTRACT At a time when the Supreme Court seems closer than ever before to treating sexual orientation as a suspect classification, consideration of the legal definition of sexual orientation is both timely and important. The Court’s 2015 decision in Obergefell recognizes two guideposts for defining sexual orientation: its immutability and normalcy. While other scholars offer rich and nuanced accounts of the fight for gay, lesbian, transgender, and bisexual rights, they do not fully analyze the history of sexual orientation as a legal category. This Article closes that gap, illuminating the hidden costs of the definition of sexual orientation that Obergefell endorses. In the past, definitions of sexual orientation based on immutability helped courts turn away equal protection arguments because of the “real” biological differences between same-sex and opposite sex couples.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT 50Th Anniversary Celebration SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES
    LGBT 50th Anniversary Celebration SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES: Presenter ($250,000) Listing as Presenter on website and in electronic and media promotions Acknowledgment at 50th Anniversary Ceremony on Fourth of July and at National Panels Twenty (20) VIP Passes Two (2) representatives on stage at 50th Anniversary Ceremony Total of ten (10) hotel-room nights (for use July 3 and/or 4) Two (2) autographed “Gay Pioneers” posters Co-Presenter ($100,000) Listing as Co-Presenter on website and in electronic and media promotions Acknowledgment at 50th Anniversary Ceremony on Fourth of July and at National Panels Ten (10) VIP Passes One (1) representative on stage at 50th Anniversary Ceremony Four (4) hotel-room nights (for use July 3 and/or 4) One (1) autographed “Gay Pioneers” poster Rainbow Sponsor ($50,000) Listing as Rainbow Sponsor on website and in electronic and media promotions Acknowledgment at 50th Anniversary Ceremony on Fourth of July Five (5) VIP Passes One (1) autographed “Gay Pioneers” poster 50th Anniversary VIP Lunch Sponsor ($50,000) Preceding the 50th Anniversary Ceremony Listing as 50th Anniversary VIP Lunch Sponsor on website and in electronic and media promotions Acknowledgment at the sponsored event at the Liberty View Ballroom, Independence Visitor Center, Independence Mall on Fourth Twenty-five (25) guests for the lunch Program Sponsor ($25,000) Acknowledgment as Program Sponsor of: National Legal Panel, National Museum of American Jewish History, Independence Mall, July 2 National Politics Panel, Congress
    [Show full text]
  • Before Stonewall the Making of a Gay and Lesbian Community
    Before Stonewall The Making of a Gay and Lesbian Community Newly Restored in Conjunction with the 50 th Anniversary of the Stonewall Riots Executive Producer: John Scagliotti • Director: Greta Schiller • Co-Director: Robert Rosenberg Produced by Robert Rosenberg, John Scagliotti & Greta Schiller 87 minutes, color, 1984, Documentary {Official Selection – Sundance Film Festival} {Best Historical Cultural Program – Emmy Award} {Best Documentary Feature – Los Angeles Filmex} FIRST RUN FEATURES 630 Ninth Ave. #1213 New York, NY 10036 (212) 243-0600 / Fax (212) 989-7649 Website: www.firstrunfeatures.com Email: [email protected] Synopsis: In 1969 the police raided the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in New York City's Greenwich Village, leading to three nights of rioting by the city's gay community. With this outpouring of courage and unity the gay liberation movement had begun. Before Stonewall pries open the closet door, setting free the dramatic story of the sometimes horrifying public and private existences experienced by LGBT Americans since the early 1900's. Revealing and often humorous, this widely acclaimed film relives the emotionally-charged sparking of the contemporary Lesbian and Gay rights movements, from the events that led to the fevered 1969 riots to many other milestones in the brave fight for acceptance. Experience the fascinating and unforgettable, decade-by-decade history of homosexuality in America through eye-opening historical footage and amazing interviews with those who lived through an often brutal closeted history. Narrated by Rita Mae Brown Groundbreaking interviews with Ann Bannon, Martin Duberman, Allen Ginsberg, Barbara Gittings, Harry Hay, Mabel Hampton, Dr. Evelyn Hooker, Frank Kameny, Audre Lorde, Richard Bruce Nugent, Jose Sarria and many more.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating LGBTQ and Gender Studies Into Massachusetts 9-12 United States History Curriculum Frameworks Sarah Pesaturo University of Massachusetts Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst College of Education Undergraduate Honors College of Education Projects 2016 Incorporating LGBTQ and Gender Studies into Massachusetts 9-12 United States History Curriculum Frameworks Sarah Pesaturo University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/education_honors Recommended Citation Pesaturo, Sarah, "Incorporating LGBTQ and Gender Studies into Massachusetts 9-12 nitU ed States History Curriculum Frameworks" (2016). College of Education Undergraduate Honors Projects. 1. https://doi.org/10.7275/R5KW5D87 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/education_honors/1 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Education at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Education Undergraduate Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INCORPORATING LGBTQ AND GENDER STUDIES INTO MASSACHUSETTS 9-12 UNITED STATES HISTORY CURRICULUM FRAMEWORKS An Individually Contracted Honors Project Presented by Sarah Pesaturo Completion Date: April 2016 Approved By: _____________________________________________________ Project Chair, Julio C. Capó Jr., Department of History _____________________________________________________ Robert W. Maloy, Department of Teacher Education & Curriculum Studies ABSTRACT Title: Incorporating LGBTQ and Gender Studies into Massachusetts 9-12 United States History Curriculum Frameworks Author: Sarah Pesaturo Thesis/Project Type: Individually Contracted Honors Project Approved By: Julio C. Capó Jr., Department of History Approved By: Robert W. Maloy, Department of Teacher Education & Curriculum Studies Gender and LGBTQ studies have emerged as fields worthy of academic study since the 1980s. While they have increasingly entered college curricula, much work still has to be done for these to be integrated into public K-12 curricula.
    [Show full text]
  • Gay Political Activism in Washington, DC, 1961-1973 Peter Bonds James Madison University
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2016 Stonewall on the Potomac: Gay political activism in Washington, DC, 1961-1973 Peter Bonds James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bonds, Peter, "Stonewall on the Potomac: Gay political activism in Washington, DC, 1961-1973" (2016). Masters Theses. 455. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/455 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stonewall on the Potomac: Gay Political Activism in Washington, DC, 1961-1973 Peter Bonds A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History May 2016 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Dr. Evan Friss Committee Members/ Readers: Dr. Emily Westkaemper Dr. Christian Davis Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the tremendous help I received from the Historical Society of Washington, and Philip Clark of its Rainbow History Project. In addition, I owe a debt of gratitude to Paul Kuntzler, who was kind enough to let me interview him about his years of experience on the front lines of gay political activism in Washington, DC. Finally, thank you to my incredible friends and family, Ashley, Anthony, Bruce, Cameron, Karl, Kyle, Michael, Patrick, Mom, Dad, and Andrew, I would never have finished this without your love and support.
    [Show full text]
  • FRANK KAMENY LGBT Civil Rights Pioneer (1925-2011)
    FRANK KAMENY LGBT Civil Rights Pioneer (1925-2011) Institutionalized anti-gay bigotry during the McCarthy-Era drove astronomer Frank Kameny from his job at the U.S. Army Map Service and into the pantheon of modern LGBT activism. He single-handedly took on the U.S. government – using his own name and face in an era when most gay people could not risk being photographed – to petition the Supreme Court in 1961 in a futile attempt to overturn his job dismissal. Effectively unemployable in his chosen field, he struggled in poverty while an aggressive, pro- active, politically-driven crusade – fueled by his uncompromising belief that “Gay is Good” – took shape in his mind. An apostate of the early Homophile Movement, Kameny rejected characterizing homosexuality as a border-line mental illness in order to win sympathy, if not approval, from straight people. Arguing that “gays must not be a mere passive battlefield across which conflicting ‘authorities’ fight their intellectual battles” – and that they should play an active role in determining their own fate – he co- founded an independent chapter of the Mattachine Society in Washington DC to focus on changing laws and challenging institutions whose policies forced people to remain closeted. Along with Barbara Gittings, he led the successful effort to remove homosexuality from the American Psychiatric Association’s list of mental disorders in 1973. A veteran of World War II, Kameny deliberately orchestrated Vietnam War hero Sgt. Leonard Matlovich’s public admission of homosexuality in order to bring the issue of gay people serving openly in the military into the national consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Gittings B
    BARBARA GITTINGS b. July 31, 1932 d. February 18, 2007 GAY PIONEER “I’ve had the satisfaction of working with other gay people all across the country … to change prejudiced hearts and minds.” Barbara Gittings is regarded as the Barbara Gittings is regarded as the mother of the LGBT civil rights movement. mother of the LGBT civil rights movement. In the 1950s gay activism was in its infancy. “There were scarcely 200 of us in the whole United States,” Gittings said of her fellow crusaders. “It was like a club—we all knew each other.” TOBIN LAHUSEN © KAY Although she lived in Philadelphia, Gittings started the New York chapter of the Daughters of Bilitis (DOB) in 1958. Founded in San Francisco, the DOB was the first lesbian civil rights organization in the United States. From 1963 to 1966, Gittings was the editor of the DOB’s publication, The Ladder, the first national lesbian magazine. With fellow activist Frank Kameny, Gittings helped organize the Annual Reminders—the first public demonstrations for gay equality. Held in front of Independence Hall each Fourth of July from 1965 to 1969, the protests paved the way for the Stonewall riot in 1969. At the 1965 Annual Reminder, 40 openly gay and lesbian picketers from New York, Washington, D.C., and Philadelphia participated. By 1969 their numbers had more than tripled. After 1969, Kameny, Gittings and others suspended the Annual Reminders to marshal support for a 1970 march on the first anniversary of Stonewall. Proceeding from Greenwich Village to Central Park, it is remembered as the first New York City Pride Parade.
    [Show full text]
  • Unreason and Enchantment in the Gay Liberation Movement A
    The Falling Dream: Unreason and Enchantment in the Gay Liberation Movement A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Abram J. Lewis IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Regina Kunzel, adviser; Roderick Ferguson, co-adviser July 2015 © Abram J. Lewis 2015 Acknowledgements Completing a PhD is a colossal undertaking that highlights the ineluctably social character of knowledge production. This dissertation could not have been possible without the generosity of many, both within and beyond my academic life. I am grateful to everyone who invested their knowledge, labor, patience, and support in this project over the last several years. These remarks will not do justice to those contributions, but I will nonetheless attempt to confer some recognition here. This dissertation is the product of an exceptionally committed and insightful committee. Kevin Murphy has effectively served as my third advisor throughout my graduate career: Kevin has provided feedback on innumerable seminar papers, funding proposals, job applications, and publication materials. Beyond scholarly feedback, Kevin has been integral to my attempts to figure out how to “do” academia. Roderick Ferguson has remained a generous, engaged, and at times, especially challenging reader, for which I feel particularly fortunate. It has been exciting to have Rod as a co-advisor as our current projects have brought us into overlapping historical and theoretical loops of flight. I am thankful to have retained Rod as an interlocutor, even as our professional trajectories drew us to Chicago and New York City respectively. Jean Langford was a serendipitous addition to a committee otherwise populated by Americanists associated with gender and sexuality studies.
    [Show full text]