A Review on General Description of Vachellia Farnesiana (L.) Wight &Arn
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cheetah Conservation Fund Farmlands Wild and Native Species
Cheetah Conservation Fund Farmlands Wild and Native Species List Woody Vegetation Silver terminalia Terminalia sericea Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 3: List of com- Blue green sour plum Ximenia Americana mon trees, scrub, and understory vegeta- Buffalo thorn Ziziphus mucronata tion found on CCF farms (2005). Warm-cure Pseudogaltonia clavata albizia Albizia anthelmintica Mundulea sericea Shepherds tree Boscia albitrunca Tumble weed Acrotome inflate Brandy bush Grevia flava Pig weed Amaranthus sp. Flame acacia Senegalia ataxacantha Wild asparagus Asparagus sp. Camel thorn Vachellia erioloba Tsama/ melon Citrullus lanatus Blue thorn Senegalia erubescens Wild cucumber Coccinea sessilifolia Blade thorn Senegalia fleckii Corchorus asplenifolius Candle pod acacia Vachellia hebeclada Flame lily Gloriosa superba Mountain thorn Senegalia hereroensis Tribulis terestris Baloon thron Vachellia luederitziae Solanum delagoense Black thorn Senegalia mellifera subsp. Detin- Gemsbok bean Tylosema esculentum ens Blepharis diversispina False umbrella thorn Vachellia reficience (Forb) Cyperus fulgens Umbrella thorn Vachellia tortilis Cyperus fulgens Aloe littoralis Ledebouria spp. Zebra aloe Aloe zebrine Wild sesame Sesamum triphyllum White bauhinia Bauhinia petersiana Elephant’s ear Abutilon angulatum Smelly shepherd’s tree Boscia foetida Trumpet thorn Catophractes alexandri Grasses Kudu bush Combretum apiculatum Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 4: List of com- Bushwillow Combretum collinum mon grass species found on CCF farms Lead wood Combretum imberbe (2005). Sand commiphora Commiphora angolensis Annual Three-awn Aristida adscensionis Brandy bush Grevia flava Blue Buffalo GrassCenchrus ciliaris Common commiphora Commiphora pyran- Bottle-brush Grass Perotis patens cathioides Broad-leaved Curly Leaf Eragrostis rigidior Lavender bush Croton gratissimus subsp. Broom Love Grass Eragrostis pallens Gratissimus Bur-bristle Grass Setaria verticillata Sickle bush Dichrostachys cinerea subsp. -
Plants Prohibited from Sale in South Australia Plants Considered As Serious Weeds Are Banned from Being Sold in South Australia
Plants prohibited from sale in South Australia Plants considered as serious weeds are banned from being sold in South Australia. Do not buy or sell any plant listed as prohibited from sale. Plants listed in this document are declared serious weeds and are prohibited from sale anywhere in South Australia pursuant to Section 188 of the Landscape South Australia Act 2019 (refer South Australian Government Gazette 60: 4024-4038, 23 July 2020). This includes the sale of nursery stock, seeds or other propagating material. However, it is not prohibited to sell or transport non-living products made from these plants, such as timber from Aleppo pine, or herbal medicines containing horehound. Such products are excluded from the definition of plant, under the Landscape South Australia (General) Regulations 2020. Section 3 of the Act defines sell as including: • barter, offer or attempt to sell • receive for sale • have in possession for sale • cause or permit to be sold or offered for sale • send, forward or deliver for sale • dispose of by any method for valuable consideration • dispose of to an agent for sale on consignment • sell for the purposes of resale How to use this list Plants are often known by many names. This list can help you to find the scientific name and other common names of a declared plant. This list is not intended to be a complete synonymy for each species, such as would be found in a taxonomic revision. The plants are listed alphabetically by the common name as used in the declaration. Each plant is listed in the following format: Common name alternative common name(s) Scientific name Author Synonym(s) Author What to do if you suspect a plant for sale is banned If you are unsure whether a plant offered for sale under a particular name is banned, please contact your regional landscape board or PIRSA Biosecurity SA. -
Avifaunal Impact Assessment: Scoping
AVIFAUNAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: SCOPING Proposed construction and operation of the 100MW Rondavel Solar Photovoltaic Facility, Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) and associated infrastructure located near Kroonstad in the Free State Province November 2020 Page | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY South Africa Mainstream Renewable Power Developments (Pty) Ltd is proposing the construction and operation of the 100 MW Rondavel Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Energy Facility (SEF) and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS), near the town of Kroonstad in the Moqhaka Local Municipality (Fezile Dabi District) of the Free State Province of South Africa. The proposed PV facility will be connecting to the grid via a 132kV grid connection, which is the subject of a separate EA. This bird scoping assessment report deals only with the proposed 100 MW Rondavel Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Facility, and the associated infrastructure thereof. 1. Impacts The anticipated impacts were summarized, and a comparison made between pre-and post-mitigation phases as shown in the Table below. The rating of environmental issues associated with different parameters prior to and post mitigation of a proposed activity was averaged. A comparison was then made to determine the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures. The comparison identified critical issues related to the environmental parameters. Environmental Issues Anticipated rating prior to Anticipated rating post parameter mitigation mitigation Avifauna Displacement of 40 medium 30 medium priority species due to disturbance associated -
Supplementary Materialsupplementary Material
10.1071/BT13149_AC © CSIRO 2013 Australian Journal of Botany 2013, 61(6), 436–445 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Comparative dating of Acacia: combining fossils and multiple phylogenies to infer ages of clades with poor fossil records Joseph T. MillerA,E, Daniel J. MurphyB, Simon Y. W. HoC, David J. CantrillB and David SeiglerD ACentre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600 Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BRoyal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Vic. 3141, Australia. CSchool of Biological Sciences, Edgeworth David Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. DDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1 Materials used in the study Taxon Dataset Genbank Acacia abbreviata Maslin 2 3 JF420287 JF420065 JF420395 KC421289 KC796176 JF420499 Acacia adoxa Pedley 2 3 JF420044 AF523076 AF195716 AF195684; AF195703 Acacia ampliceps Maslin 1 KC421930 EU439994 EU811845 Acacia anceps DC. 2 3 JF420244 JF420350 JF419919 JF420130 JF420456 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth 2 3 JF420259 JF420036 JF420366 JF419935 JF420146 KF048140 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth. 1 2 3 JF420293 JF420402 KC421323 JQ248740 JF420505 Acacia baeuerlenii Maiden & R.T.Baker 2 3 JF420229 JQ248866 JF420336 JF419909 JF420115 JF420448 Acacia beckleri Tindale 2 3 JF420260 JF420037 JF420367 JF419936 JF420147 JF420473 Acacia cochlearis (Labill.) H.L.Wendl. 2 3 KC283897 KC200719 JQ943314 AF523156 KC284140 KC957934 Acacia cognata Domin 2 3 JF420246 JF420022 JF420352 JF419921 JF420132 JF420458 Acacia cultriformis A.Cunn. ex G.Don 2 3 JF420278 JF420056 JF420387 KC421263 KC796172 JF420494 Acacia cupularis Domin 2 3 JF420247 JF420023 JF420353 JF419922 JF420133 JF420459 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 JF420269 JF420378 KC421251 KC955787 JF420485 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 KC283375 KC200761 JQ942686 KC421315 KC284195 Acacia deanei (R.T.Baker) M.B.Welch, Coombs 2 3 JF420294 JF420403 KC421329 KC955795 & McGlynn JF420506 Acacia dempsteri F.Muell. -
A Review of Pharmacological Activities of Acacia Nilotica (Linn) Willd W.S.R to Osteoporosis Kamini Kaushal 1 Abstract
Review Article A Review of Pharmacological Activities of Acacia nilotica (Linn) willd W.S.R to Osteoporosis Kamini Kaushal 1 Abstract Medicinal plants have been utilized for the treatment of diseases since creation of earth or before it; in traditional medicine, they still play an important role as effective and have natural origin. Acacia nilotica commonly known as babul belongs to the family Fabaceae and is widely distributed all over India, SriLanka, and Sudan; Egypt is the native country of this plant. Useful parts such as root, bark, leaves, flower, gum, pods, etc., are used in medicines. Different parts of the plant like leaves and fruit contain tannin; flower contains stearic acid, kaempferol-3-glucoside, isoquercetin, leucocyanidin; pod contains tannin, polyphenolic compounds, gum Contains arabic acid combined with calcium, magnesium and potassium. In traditional medicine, it is used for bleeding diseases, prolapsed, leucorrhoea, antihypertensive, antispasmodic, antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant activity, etc. The present review is an attempt to explore and comprehensively highlight use for osteoporosis, phytochemical properties and pharmacological uses of A. nilotica reported till date. Keywords: Acacia arabica; Acacia nilotica , Pharmacological study, Tannin, Arabic acid, Uses Introduction More than 30% healthcare industry from all over the world relies on medicinal plants. In India, traditional system of medicine such as Ayurveda since ancient times is root of medicine. About 750 species are being utilized in Ayurveda system of medicine and in modern medicine around 30 species only.1 Medicinal plants are playing continuously essential part of Indian system of medicine. Acacia genus belongs to shrubs and trees, subfamily Mimosoideae, 2,3 of the family Fabaceae (Leguminosae).4,5 The species name is nilotica/arebica/scorpioides. -
Restricted Invasive Plants of Queensland
Restricted invasive plants Restricted invasive plants of Queensland Restricted invasive plants of Queensland Hudson pear (Cylindropuntia rosea syn. Cylindropuntia pallida) Fireweed (Senecio madagascariensis) Mother-of-millions (Kalanchoe delagoense) Bunny ears (Opuntia microdasys) The new Biosecurity Act The Biosecurity Act 2014 protects Queensland’s economy, Species not listed as restricted may be listed as prohibited biodiversity and people’s lifestyles from the threats posed under the Act or may be listed by a local government level by invasive pests and diseases under local laws. Under the Act, certain species of invasive plants are listed Australian Government legislation administered by the as ‘restricted’ biosecurity matter. Australian Department of Agriculture also applies to the import of all plants into Australia. What is restricted matter? • Mexican bean tree (Cecropia pachystachya, C. palmata and C. peltata) Restricted matter is listed in the Act and includes a range • Mexican feather grass (Nassella tenuissima) of invasive plants that are present in Queensland. These invasive plants are having significant adverse impacts • miconia (M. calvescens, M. cionotricha, M. nervosa in Queensland and it is desirable to manage them and and M. racemosa) prevent their spread, thereby protecting un-infested • mikania vine (Mikania micrantha) parts of the State. • mimosa pigra (Mimosa pigra) The Act requires everyone to take all reasonable and practical measures to minimise the biosecurity risks • bunny ears (Opuntia microdasys) associated with invasive plants and animals under • riverina prickly pear (Opunita elata) their control. This is called a general biosecurity obligation (GBO). • water mimosa (Neptunia oleracea and N. plena). The specific restriction requirements also apply to a Restricted invasive plants that are person when dealing with restricted invasive matter. -
Early Growth and Survival of Different Woody Plant Species Established Through Direct Sowing in a Degraded Land, Southern Ethiopia
JOURNAL OF DEGRADED AND MINING LANDS MANAGEMENT ISSN: 2339-076X (p); 2502-2458 (e), Volume 6, Number 4 (July 2019):1861-1873 DOI:10.15243/jdmlm.2019.064.1861 Research Article Early growth and survival of different woody plant species established through direct sowing in a degraded land, Southern Ethiopia Shiferaw Alem*, Hana Habrova Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geo-biocenology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 3/61300, Brno, Czech Republic *corresponding author: [email protected] Received 2 May 2019, Accepted 30 May 2019 Abstract: In addition to tree planting activities, finding an alternative method to restore degraded land in semi-arid areas is necessary, and direct seeding of woody plants might be an alternative option. The objectives of this study paper were (1) evaluate the growth, biomass and survival of different woody plant species established through direct seeding in a semi-arid degraded land; (2) identify woody plant species that could be further used for restoration of degraded lands. To achieve the objectives eight woody plant species seeds were gathered, their seeds were sown in a degraded land, in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) (n=4). Data on germination, growth and survival of the different woody plants were collected at regular intervals during an eleven-month period. At the end of the study period, the remaining woody plants' dry biomasses were assessed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the data analysis and mean separation was performed using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test (p=0.05). The result revealed significant differences on the mean heights, root length, root collar diameters, root to shoot ratio, dry root biomasses and dry shoot biomasses of the different species (p < 0.05). -
Download Download
Botswana Journal of Agriculture and Applied Sciences, Volume 14, Issue 1 (2020) 7–16 BOJAAS Research Article Comparative nutritive value of an invasive exotic plant species, Prosopis glandulosa Torr. var. glandulosa, and five indigenous plant species commonly browsed by small stock in the BORAVAST area, south-western Botswana M. K. Ditlhogo1, M. P Setshogo1,* and G. Mosweunyane2 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Botswana, Private Bag UB00704, Gaborone, Botswana. 2Geoflux Consulting Company, P.O. Box 2403, Gaborone, Botswana. ARTICLE INFORMATION ________________________ Keywords Abstract: Nutritive value of an invasive exotic plant species, Prosopis glandulosa Torr. var. glandulosa, and five indigenous plant species Nutritive value commonly browsed by livestock in Bokspits, Rapplespan, Vaalhoek and Prosopis glandulosa Struizendam (BORAVAST), southwest Botswana, was determined and BORAVAST compared. These five indigenous plant species were Vachellia Indigenous plant species hebeclada (DC.) Kyal. & Boatwr. subsp. hebeclada, Vachellia erioloba (E. Mey.) P.J.H. Hurter, Senegalia mellifera (Vahl) Seigler & Ebinger Article History: subsp. detinens (Burch.) Kyal. & Boatwr., Boscia albitrunca (Burch.) Submission date: 25 Jun. 2019 Gilg & Gilg-Ben. var. albitrunca and Rhigozum trichotomum Burch. Revised: 14 Jan. 2020 The levels of Crude Protein (CP), Phosphorus (P), Calcium (C), Accepted: 16 Jan. 2020 Magnesium (Mg), Sodium (Na) and Potassium (K) were determined for Available online: 04 Apr. 2020 the plant’s foliage and pods (where available). All plant species had a https://bojaas.buan.ac.bw CP value higher than the recommended daily intake. There are however multiple mineral deficiencies in the plant species analysed. Nutritive Corresponding Author: value of Prosopis glandulosa is comparable to those other species despite the perception that livestock that browse on it are more Moffat P. -
Florida Honey Bee Plants1 Mary Christine Bammer, William H Kern, and Jamie D
ENY-171 Florida Honey Bee Plants1 Mary Christine Bammer, William H Kern, and Jamie D. Ellis2 Several factors influence the flora throughout Florida, While many plants are acceptable pollen producers for including annual freezes, average temperature, annual honey bees, fewer yield enough nectar to produce a surplus rainfall, and soil composition. Because of these variations, honey crop. The tables in this document list the nectar- plants that grow well in one region may not grow well bearing plants that are present to some degree in each in another. Climate, plant communities, and timing of region and the plants’ respective bloom times. Please note, floral resources differ significantly between the three main any nectar plants that are considered invasive in Florida regions in Florida: north Florida, central Florida, and south have been excluded from this list. Florida (north Florida encompasses the panhandle region south through Alachua, Levy, Putnam, and Flagler counties. Central Florida includes Marion County south through Sarasota County. South Florida encompasses the remaining counties including the Keys) (Figure 1). Figure 2. Honey bee on wild mustard. Figure 1. 1. This document is ENY-171, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date September 2018. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Mary Christine Bammer, Extension coordinator, Department of Entomology and Nematology; William H Kern, associate professor of urban entomology, Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Ft. Lauderdale Research & Education Center; and Jamie D. Ellis, associate professor, Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611. -
Vachellia Clarksoniana (Pedley) Kodela
WATTLE Acacias of Australia Vachellia clarksoniana (Pedley) Kodela Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. Vachellia clarksoniana occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Family Fabaceae Distribution Restricted to the south-central part of Cape York Pen., Qld. Description Trees to 5 m tall, facultatively deciduous. Bark tessellated, pale brown. Branchlets hirsute with erect hyaline hairs c. 0.1 mm long and scattered longer ones 0.7 mm, red-glandular trichomes conspicuous on developing leaves. Stipules on flowering stems straight, rather brittle, subspiny, 1.5–2 mm long, often wanting. Leaves: axis 60–80 mm long (including petiole c. 10 mm), indumentum similar to branchlets; gland sessile, 1–1.5 mm long, 0.3–0.5 mm wide, situated immediately below lowest pair of pinnae; pinnae 12–16 pairs, 10–20 mm long; pinnules 15–26 pairs, oblong, 1.8–2.5 mm long, 0.5–0.7 mm wide, midrib prominent on lower surface, long hairs on margin. Heads globular, 13–20 (–30)-flowered; peduncles 15–45 mm long, indumentum similar to branchlets, involucel at about the middle. Flowers 5-merous; calyx gamosepalous; corolla 2.7–3 mm long; anthers with a globular appendage c. 0.1 mm diam. Pods narrowly oblong, straight edged or constricted between seeds, ±flat, 6–12 cm long, 12–17 mm wide, coriaceous to thinly crustaceous, longitudinally reticulate, glabrous or puberulous. Seed longitudinal, elliptic, flat, 9–12 x 7–8, scarcely arillate. -
Plant of the Week
Acacia What’s in a name? Acacia is an Australian icon. It’s up there with emus and kangaroos! It’s our national floral emblem! We celebrate National Wattle Day and our international sporting teams compete in gold and green. How is it then that we came so close to losing the name Acacia for our wattle trees? And yet, until the International Botanical Congress in Melbourne, 2011, this almost happened. The controversy starts with the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi and Plants, a set of rules agreed by the world’s scientific community to manage the names of these organisms. There are about 1,300 species in what has been known until recently as the genus Acacia including ~ 1,000 from Australia, ~ 150 from Africa, and a few from south-east Asia and the Americas. The first Acacia to be named was an African species, Acacia scorpioides (syn. A. nilotica), which, according to the International Code, then Acacia longifolia – Sydney Golden Wattle, became the type species for the genus from eastern and southern Australia. Acacia. However, in recent years, botanists determined that there were sufficient differences between groups of Acacia species to separate the genus into five genera. Most Australian species clearly fell into a different group from the African species, but because an African species was the first named, rules of international Vachellia nilotica – previously Acacia scorpioides – nomenclature required another The original type species for the genus Acacia genus name for most of our Photo: J.M.Garg / CC BY-SA Australian species. For quite a (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) while, it looked as if our beloved Acacia would be given the uninspiring name of Racosperma. -
Causes and Consequences of Coexistence in the Vachellia Drepanolobium Ant-Plant Mutualism
Causes and consequences of coexistence in the Vachellia drepanolobium ant-plant mutualism The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:40046465 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Causes and consequences of coexistence in the Vachellia drepanolobium ant-plant mutualism A dissertation presented by John Boyle to the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Biology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Naomi E. Pierce John Boyle Causes and consequences of coexistence in the Vachellia drepanolobium ant-plant mutualism Abstract This thesis focuses on a mutualism between the East African acacia tree Vachellia drepanolobium and the species of canopy-dwelling ants that inhabit it. The tree provides the ants with nesting space in the canopy and extrafloral nectar, and in return the ants defend the tree from herbivores. Several different ant species compete vigorously with each other for this canopy nesting space. Despite this, coexistence is maintained among those species at fine spatial scales, apparently by a colonization-competition tradeoff: ant species that are the best at colonizing unoccupied trees are the worst at defending those trees from neighboring competitors, and vice versa.