Kathy Boockvar - Wikiwand
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fact Sheet: Designation of Election Infrastructure As Critical Infrastructure
Fact Sheet: Designation of Election Infrastructure as Critical Infrastructure Consistent with Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) 21, the Secretary of Homeland Security has established Election Infrastructure as a critical infrastructure subsector within the Government Facilities Sector. Election infrastructure includes a diverse set of assets, systems, and networks critical to the administration of the election process. When we use the term “election infrastrucure,” we mean the key parts of the assets, systems, and networks most critical to the security and resilience of the election process, both physical locations and information and communication technology. Specficially, we mean at least the information, capabilities, physical assets, and technologies which enable the registration and validation of voters; the casting, transmission, tabulation, and reporting of votes; and the certification, auditing, and verification of elections. Components of election infrastructure include, but are not limited to: • Physical locations: o Storage facilities, which may be located on public or private property that may be used to store election and voting system infrastructure before Election Day. o Polling places (including early voting locations), which may be physically located on public or private property, and may face physical and cyber threats to their normal operations on Election Day. o Centralized vote tabulation locations, which are used by some states and localities to process absentee and Election Day voting materials. • Information -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc. -
Case 15-10635-MFW Doc 154 Filed 04/22/15 Page 1 of 81 Case 15-10635-MFW Doc 154 Filed 04/22/15 Page 2 of 81 Karmaloop, Inc
Case 15-10635-MFW Doc 154 Filed 04/22/15 Page 1 of 81 Case 15-10635-MFW Doc 154 Filed 04/22/15 Page 2 of 81 Karmaloop, Inc. - U.S. Mail Case 15-10635-MFW Doc 154 Filed 04/22/15 Page 3 of 81 Served 4/21/2015 00NOTHING 10.DEEP 123 SNAPBACKS 300 NORTH END AVE 19226 70TH AVENUE SOUTH 577 BUCKINGHAM WAY UNIT 3E KENT, WA 98032 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94132-1904 NEW YORK, NY 10282 191 UNLIMITED 1POINT 1POINT 634 GROVE AVE 222 MERCHANDISE MART PLAZA 33 MONTCLAIR AVE EDISON, NJ 08820 SUITE 1212 SUITE 1 CHICAGO, IL 60654 MONTCLAIR, NJ 07042 1ST CLASS 2 FEET PRODUCTIONS 24/7 REAL MEDIA US, INC. 3913 8TH AVE PO BOX 223636 PO BOX 200020 BROOKLYN, NY 11232 PITTSBURGH, PA 15251-2636 PITTSBURGH, PA 15251-0020 40 OZ 54 RECKLESS 7TH LETTER ATTN: CREDIT DEPT. 6380 WILSHIRE BLVD DBA THE SEVENTH LETTER 501 10TH AVENUE, 7TH FLOOR SUITE 1106 346 N FAIRFAX AVE. NEW YORK, NY 10018 LOS ANGELES, CA 90046 LOS ANGELES, CA 90036 8 OTHER REASONS A.J. MORGAN A1 LLC, A NEVIS LLC 908 SOUTH HOBART BLVD #310 850 S. BROADWAY UNIT 202-203 JOSEPH CIMINO, MANAGER LOS ANGELES, CA 90006 LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 8 SELBOURNE AVE RICHMOND, NELSON 7020 NEW ZEALAND AARON LOCKLEAR ABDULLAH ABDUL-AZIM ABOY LLC 7981 RENNERT RD. 226 WEST 152ND STREET, APT 4A C/O THE DRUKER COMPANY SHANNON, NC 28386 NEW YORK, NY 10039 50 FEDERAL STREET, SUITE 1000 BOSTON, MA 02110 ABOY, LLC ABSURD NEW YORK ACCOUTREMENTS C/O TDC HOLDING CORP. -
Aow 2021 14 No Voter Fraud
1. Mark your confusion. 2. Show evidence of a close reading. 3. Write a 1+ page reflection. The Times Called Officials in Every State: No Evidence of Voter Fraud The president and his allies have baselessly claimed that rampant voter fraud stole victory from him. Officials contacted by The Times said that there were no irregularities that affected the outcome. Source: Nick Corasanti, Reid J. Epstein and Jim Rutenberg, New York Times, November 12, 2020 PHILADELPHIA — Election officials in dozens of states representing both political parties said that there was no evidence that fraud or other irregularities played a role in the outcome of the presidential race, amounting to a forceful rebuke of President Trump’s portrait of a fraudulent election. Over the last several days, the president, members of his administration, congressional Republicans and right wing allies have put forth the false claim that the election was stolen from Mr. Trump and have refused to accept results that showed Joseph R. Biden Jr. as the winner. But top election officials across the country said in interviews and statements that the process had been a remarkable success despite record turnout and the complications of a dangerous pandemic. “There’s a great human capacity for inventing things that aren’t true about elections,” said Frank LaRose, a Republican who serves as Ohio’s secretary of state. “The conspiracy theories and rumors and all those things run rampant. For some reason, elections breed that type of mythology.” “Kansas did not experience any widespread, systematic issues with voter fraud, intimidation, irregularities or voting problems,” a spokeswoman for Scott Schwab, the Republican secretary of state in Kansas, said in an email Tuesday. -
Election Summary Primary Election **Official Results** Run Date:08/28/18 Natrona County, Wyoming Run Time:04:17 Pm
ELECTION SUMMARY PRIMARY ELECTION **OFFICIAL RESULTS** RUN DATE:08/28/18 NATRONA COUNTY, WYOMING RUN TIME:04:17 PM AUGUST 21, 2018 STATISTICS VOTES PERCENT PRECINCTS COUNTED (OF 46) . 46 100.00 REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . 33,745 BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. 16,469 BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN PARTY . 14,387 87.36 BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC PARTY . 1,853 11.25 BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN. 229 1.39 BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. 4 .02 VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . 48.80 VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . .01 ********** (REPUBLICAN PARTY) ********** UNITED STATES SENATOR FEDERAL DISTRICT VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 JOHN BARRASSO . 8,899 61.85 DAVE DODSON. 4,503 31.30 JOHN HOLTZ . 295 2.05 CHARLIE HARDY . 226 1.57 ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA FUENTE. 125 .87 ANTHONY L. VAN RISSEGHEM . 48 .33 WRITE-IN. 41 .28 Over Votes . 10 .07 Under Votes . 240 1.67 Total . 14,387 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE WYOMING CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT ONE VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 LIZ CHENEY . 9,524 66.20 ROD MILLER . 2,418 16.81 BLAKE E. STANLEY . 1,595 11.09 WRITE-IN. 72 .50 Over Votes . 8 .06 Under Votes . 770 5.35 Total . 14,387 GOVERNOR STATE OF WYOMING VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 MARK GORDON. 4,771 33.16 FOSTER FRIESS . 3,554 24.70 HARRIET M. HAGEMAN . 3,078 21.39 SAM E. GALEOTOS . 2,355 16.37 TAYLOR HAYNES . 398 2.77 BILL DAHLIN. 136 .95 WRITE-IN. 13 .09 Over Votes . 8 .06 Under Votes . 74 .51 Total . 14,387 SECRETARY OF STATE STATE OF WYOMING VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 EDWARD BUCHANAN . -
Notice of Election
NOTICE OF ELECTION Notice is hereby given that a General Election will be held in the State of Missouri on the 8th day of November, 2016 for the purpose of voting on candidates and statewide ballot measures (Section 115.125, RSMo). DEMOCRATIC PARTY REPUBLICAN PARTY LIBERTARIAN PARTY CONSTITUTION PARTY GREEN PARTY FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT (VOTE FOR 1) HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON TIMOTHY MICHAEL KAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DONALD J. TRUMP MICHAEL R. PENCE REPUBLICAN PARTY GARY JOHNSON BILL WELD LIBERTARIAN PARTY DARRELL L. CASTLE SCOTT N. BRADLEY CONSTITUTION PARTY JILL STEIN AJAMU BARAKA GREEN PARTY FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR (VOTE FOR 1) JASON KANDER DEMOCRATIC PARTY ROY BLUNT REPUBLICAN PARTY JONATHAN DINE LIBERTARIAN PARTY FRED RYMAN CONSTITUTION PARTY JOHNATHAN MCFARLAND GREEN PARTY FOR GOVERNOR (VOTE FOR 1) CHRIS KOSTER DEMOCRATIC PARTY ERIC GREITENS REPUBLICAN PARTY CISSE W SPRAGINS LIBERTARIAN PARTY DON FITZ GREEN PARTY LESTER BENTON (LES) TURILLI, JR. INDEPENDENT FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (VOTE FOR 1) RUSS CARNAHAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY MIKE PARSON REPUBLICAN PARTY STEVEN R. HEDRICK LIBERTARIAN PARTY JENNIFER LEACH GREEN PARTY FOR SECRETARY OF STATE (VOTE FOR 1) ROBIN SMITH DEMOCRATIC PARTY JOHN (JAY) ASHCROFT REPUBLICAN PARTY CHRIS MORRILL LIBERTARIAN PARTY FOR STATE TREASURER (VOTE FOR 1) JUDY BAKER DEMOCRATIC PARTY ERIC SCHMITT REPUBLICAN PARTY SEAN O’TOOLE LIBERTARIAN PARTY CAROL HEXEM GREEN PARTY FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL (VOTE FOR 1) TERESA HENSLEY DEMOCRATIC PARTY JOSH HAWLEY REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 4 -
John H. Merrill Secretary of State
ALABAMA STATE CAPITOL (334) 242-7200 600 DEXTER AVENUE FAX (334) 242-4993 SUITE S-105 WWW.SOS.ALABAMA.GOV MONTGOMERY, AL 36130 [email protected] JOHN H. MERRILL SECRETARY OF STATE February 22, 2021 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate 322 Hart S.O.B. 317 Russell S.O.B. Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker of the House Minority Leader of the House House of Representatives House of Representatives 1236 Longworth H.O.B. 2468 Rayburn H.O.B. Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Majority Leader Schumer, Minority Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and House Minority Leader McCarthy: We are writing you today to urge you to reject the “For the People Act” otherwise known as H.R. 1 or S. 1, which is a dangerous overreach by the federal government into the administration of elections. Each state legislature should have the freedom and flexibility to determine practices that best meet the needs of their respective states. A one-size-fits-all approach mandated by Congress is not the solution to any of our problems. These bills intrude upon our constitutional rights, and further sacrifice the security and integrity of the elections process. We firmly believe the authority to legislate and regulate these changes should be left with the states. H.R. 1 and S. 1 blatantly undermine the extensive work we, as election officials, have completed in order to provide safe, accessible voting options for our constituencies. -
Proposed Original Jurisdiction Case Between The
PROPOSED ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CASE BETWEEN THE PLAINTIFF STATES REGARDING EVIDENCE OF MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD AND A CRIMINAL EFFORT TO COVER UP THAT FRAUD IN NUMEROUS DEFENDANT STATES PURPOSE: This outline is designed as an advisory report based on existing massive evidence of election misdeeds performed by numerous actors at the national, state and local levels, with the clear intent to manipulate the outcome of the 2020 elections, specifically, but not limited to, the defendant states and actors recommended below. The objective is as follows, 1) Appeal directly to the US Supreme Court under its original jurisdiction pertaining to constitutional cases involving two or more states; 2) Declaring proper legal standing as a result of all 50 states and 332 million Citizens being subject to the fraudulent results of elections in the defendant states; 3) To bring evidence to the highest court in the land, of massive and highly coordinated election tampering in numerous states, to prevent the United States from breaking apart as a direct result of the actions taken unlawfully in the defendant states; 4) Provide for an immediate legal and constitutional solution to the most fraudulent election cycle in USA history, before American citizens lose all faith and trust in our Republican forms of government and attempt to resolve this constitutional crisis themselves; PROPOSED PLAINTIFFS STATE OF TEXAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN PAXTON STATE OF ALABAMA, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE MARSHALL STATE OF ARKANSAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL LESLIE RUTLEDGE STATE OF FLORIDA, -
Mail Voting Litigation During the Coronavirus Pandemic
Mail Voting Litigation During the Coronavirus Pandemic October 29, 2020 Abstract: With approximately 8 0 million Americans projected to vote by mail in November, parties have turned to the courts to clarify the appropriate ways to adapt, apply, and administer the rules of mail voting for pandemic elections. P laintis across the country have led more than 200 cases and appeals challenging nearly every aspect of the absentee balloting process, asserting claims under a variety of state and federal laws. This report outlines the many legal challenges to absentee and mail voting systems brought since March, largely in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Authors: Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan, Zahavah Levine, Aviel Menter, Christopher Meyer, Alexander Perry, and Theodora Raymond-Sidel HealthyElections.org: Mail Voting Litigation During the Coronavirus Pandemic 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Part I: Application and Eligibility to Vote By Mail 7 Applying to Vote by Mail 8 Absentee Balloting Without an Excuse 9 Fear of Contracting COVID-19 as an Excuse 11 Age Limits 14 Ensuring Receipt of Mail-In Ballots 15 Part II: Submission of Mail-In Ballots 16 Ballot Receipt Deadlines 16 Ballot Secrecy Sleeve Requirements 24 Cost of Postage for Mailing Ballots 25 Failure to Provide Accommodations for Voters with Disabilities 27 Part II Conclusion 28 Part III: Challenges Seeking to Expand Delivery Options 30 Bans on Absentee Voter Assistance 31 Limits on Absentee Ballot Drop-O Locations 33 USPS Operational Changes 35 Part III Conclusion -
Official Ballot Partisan Office and Referendum November 6, 2018
Official Ballot Partisan Office and Referendum November 6, 2018 Notice to Voters: If you are voting on Election Day, your ballot must be initialed by two election inspectors. If you are voting absentee, your ballot must be initialed by the municipal clerk or deputy clerk. Your ballot may not be counted without initials. (See end of ballot for initials.) Instructions to Voters Statewide (Cont.) County (Cont.) If you make a mistake on your ballot or State Treasurer Coroner have a question, ask an election Vote for 1 Vote for 1 inspector for help. (Absentee voters: Travis Hartwig Cindy Giese Contact your municipal clerk.) (Republican) (Republican) Sarah Godlewski To vote for a name on the ballot, make write-in: ________________________ an "X" or other mark in the square next (Democratic) to the name like this: T. Andrew Zuelke Clerk of Circuit Court To vote for a name that is not on the (Constitution) Vote for 1 ballot, write the name on the line marked Roselle M. Schlosser write-in: ________________________ "write-in". (Republican) Statewide Congressional write-in: ________________________ You may mark only one square for United States Senator the office of Governor/ Lieutenant Vote for 1 Governor. A vote for only Lieutenant Leah Vukmir Referendum Governor will not be counted. (Republican) To vote in favor of a question, make Governor / Tammy Baldwin an "X" in the square next to "Yes" Lieutenant Governor (Democratic) like this: . To vote against a Vote for 1 question, make an "X" in the square write-in: ________________________ Scott Walker / next to "No" like this: . Rebecca Kleefisch Representative in Congress County (Republican) District 3 QUESTION 1: "I support the County Tony Evers / Vote for 1 in borrowing $4,000,000 for the purpose of restoring county roads Mandela Barnes Steve Toft and maintenance to a thirty (30) (Democratic) (Republican) year pavement life cycle." Phillip Anderson / Ron Kind Patrick Baird (Democratic) (Libertarian) YES write-in: ________________________ Michael J. -
New Leadership for Hawai'i and Prospects for Policy Change
New Leadership for Hawai‘i and Prospects for Policy Change Todd L. Belt1 University of Hawai‘i at Hilo Colin D. Moore University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Introduction Hawai‘i’s slow economic recovery continued throughout 2014. Despite the improving eco- nomic news, voters ousted their brash and combative sitting governor Neil Abercrombie in the Democratic primary. The humble, unassuming state Senator David Ige rolled to a general elec- tion victory. The new governor, an electrical engineer by training and a veteran chair of the Sen- ate Ways and Means Committee, looked to bring less in terms of policy change and more in terms of approach to governance. Governor Ige was inaugurated on December 1, 2014, and his biennial budget was released on December 22. The original request reflected a status-quo budget prepared by the outgoing Aber- crombie administration. In late January 2015, Ige’s administration put together an amended budget that slightly increased budgetary requests based on expected revenue increases. Recalling the previous years’ experience of overestimated revenues, the legislature passed a conservative budget largely similar to the governor’s budget request with few alterations or new programs. State of the Economy Through 2015, economic recovery in Hawai‘i remained slow, with GDP growth since 2010 at or a bit below two percent per year (DBEDT 2015a). Unemployment continued its downward trend since its high of 7.1 percent in September of 2009. As of the end of the legislative session in May of 2015, the rate stood at 3.9 percent, still a bit above its historical average during better times (see Figure 1). -
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
(1 of 432) Case:Case 18-15845,1:19-cv-01071-LY 01/27/2020, Document ID: 11574519, 41-1 FiledDktEntry: 01/29/20 123-1, Page Page 1 1 of of 432 239 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL No. 18-15845 COMMITTEE; DSCC, AKA Democratic Senatorial Campaign D.C. No. Committee; THE ARIZONA 2:16-cv-01065- DEMOCRATIC PARTY, DLR Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona; MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees, THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY; BILL GATES, Councilman; SUZANNE KLAPP, Councilwoman; DEBBIE LESKO, Sen.; TONY RIVERO, Rep., Intervenor-Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding (2 of 432) Case:Case 18-15845,1:19-cv-01071-LY 01/27/2020, Document ID: 11574519, 41-1 FiledDktEntry: 01/29/20 123-1, Page Page 2 2 of of 432 239 2 DNC V. HOBBS Argued and Submitted En Banc March 27, 2019 San Francisco, California Filed January 27, 2020 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, William A. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon*, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Richard R. Clifton, Jay S. Bybee, Consuelo M. Callahan, Mary H. Murguia, Paul J. Watford, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge W. Fletcher; Concurrence by Judge Watford; Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain; Dissent by Judge Bybee * Judge Berzon was drawn to replace Judge Graber. Judge Berzon has read the briefs, reviewed the record, and watched the recording of oral argument held on March 27, 2019.