DOCSLIB.ORG

Contemporary British Theatre Also Available by Vicky Angelaki the PLAYS of MARTIN CRIMP: Making Theatre Strange Contemporary British Theatre Breaking New Ground

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contemporary British Theatre Also Available by Vicky Angelaki the PLAYS of MARTIN CRIMP: Making Theatre Strange Contemporary British Theatre Breaking New Ground Contemporary British Theatre Also available by Vicky Angelaki THE PLAYS OF MARTIN CRIMP: Making Theatre Strange Contemporary British Theatre Breaking New Ground Edited by Vicky Angelaki Introduction, selection and editorial matter © Vicky Angelaki 2013 Remaining chapters © Contributors 2013 Foreword © Liz Tomlin 2013 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2013 978-1-137-01012-4 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London, EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2013 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-43628-6 ISBN 978-1-137-01013-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9781137010131 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Typeset by MPS Limited, Chennai, India. For Paulina and Akis, spectators of the future This page intentionally left blank Contents Foreword by Liz Tomlin viii Acknowledgements xxvii Notes on Contributors xxviii Introduction 1 Vicky Angelaki 1 Exit the Author 9 Dan Rebellato 2 ‘And I was struck still by time’: Contemporary British Theatre and the Metaphysical Imagination 32 Chris Megson 3 Politics for the Middle Classes: Contemporary Audiences and the Violence of Now 57 Vicky Angelaki 4 Language Games and Literary Constraints: Playing with Tragedy in the Theatre of Caryl Churchill and Martin Crimp 79 Elisabeth Angel-Perez 5 Racial Violence, Witnessing and Emancipated Spectatorship in The Colour of Justice, Fallout and random 96 Mireia Aragay and Enric Monforte 6 Old Wine in a New Bottle or Vice Versa? Winsome Pinnock’s Interstitial Poetics 121 Elizabeth Sakellaridou 7 Acting In/Action: Staging Human Rights in debbie tucker green’s Royal Court Plays 145 Marissia Fragkou and Lynette Goddard 8 Children and the Limits of Representation in the Work of Tim Crouch 167 Helen Freshwater Index 189 vii Foreword: Dramatic Developments Liz Tomlin By 1999, in the words of Aleks Sierz, ‘in-yer-face theatre had become a new orthodoxy’1 with the growing familiarity of once-shocking innova- tions suggesting that ‘the tide was turning and that an era of confron- tation had come to an end’.2 In the same year, the very future of all dramatic playwriting was called into question with the publication of Hans-Thies Lehmann’s Postdramatisches Theater (Postdramatic Theatre).3 Although Lehmann’s seminal text was not translated into English until 2006, the ideas it contained disseminated rapidly throughout Europe to question the continued value of the dramatic form of theatre. There had been, Lehmann argues, a ‘retreat of dramatic imagination’4 and ‘ disappearance of the dramatic impulse’5 to the point at which ‘[d]rama and society cannot come together’.6 He concludes that ‘the dwindling of the dramatic space of imagination in the consciousness of society and of the artists seems, at any rate, indisputable and proves that something about this model is no longer in tune with our experience’.7 If drama, as Lehmann consistently argues in this study, is no longer a valid form for theatre at this point in history, then one of three things must be the case. The first is that the playwrights and playtexts examined in this volume are relics of a bygone era, with no possible relevance to the twenty-first century. The second is that all such work can no longer be considered to be dramatic, an option that I will return to shortly. But I would like to begin with a third possibility that is rarely considered by scholars working within the rubric of Lehmann’s postdramatic, which is that the historical notion of the dramatic as defined by Lehmann is no longer appropriate or relevant to the work being produced by significant numbers of dramatists at the turn of the twenty-first century. Lehmann’s definitions of the dramatic tradition consistently reference its classical Aristotelian origins, with an emphasis on its ‘logical (namely dramatic) order’, its ‘unbroken, complete unity and wholeness’, its ‘mastery of the temporal progress’, and its ‘dialectic’ which constitutes an ‘implied teleology of history’.8 He concludes that ‘the complicity of drama and logic, and then drama and dialectic, dominates the European “Aristotelian” tradition – which turns out to be highly alive even in Brecht’s “non-Aristotelian drama”’.9 For Lehmann, these philosophi- cal hallmarks are most clearly manifest in the representational world, viii Foreword ix or ‘fictive cosmos’, of the pre-existing dramatic playtext that is already complete, in and of itself, and which then subsequently becomes the point of origin and authority for the theatrical production.10 Speaking of the dramatic theatre, Lehmann argues that What is necessary […] is the principle that what we perceive in the theatre can be referred to a ‘world’, i.e. to a totality. Wholeness, illusion and world representation are inherent in the model ‘drama’; conversely, through its very form, dramatic theatre proclaims wholeness as the model of the real.11 The tendency of classical drama towards totality, closure and wholeness, makes the dramatic form, for Lehmann, ideologically regressive, in that it can only offer illusory representations of an even more illusory real- ity, enclosed within a pre-existing playtext which positions itself, again deceptively, as complete in and of itself. Thus it is only, according to Lehmann, the model of the postdramatic that can carry forward any radical potential in its ‘self-reflection, decomposition and separation of the elements of dramatic theatre’.12 It is only by breaking the ‘wholeness’ of the model of dramatic representation (and thus implicitly the ‘whole- ness’ of the reality it represents) through the fragmentation, deconstruc- tion or decontextualization of its parts, that theatre in the postmodern era can escape complicity with the discredited philosophical notion of a singular, objective and authoritative reality. Lehmann extends this ideological analysis of classical drama to models as diverse as Henrik Ibsen, Eugène Ionesco and Bertolt Brecht, on the basis that all of this theatre is text-driven and so ‘remains pledged to the hierarchy that […] ultimately subordinates the theatrical means to the text’.13 He concludes unequivocally that ‘the step to postdramatic theatre is taken only when the theatrical means beyond language are positioned equally alongside the text and are system- atically thinkable without it’.14 Thus, for Lehmann, there is no easy recalibration of the playwright as postdramatic. Under his terms, theatre in which the written text pre-exists as a given which then informs the development of the other theatrical vocabularies of the production (however significant these might become), must remain, within Lehmann’s thesis, under the dramatic rubric and consequently bear the ideological weight of his analysis.15 The resistance to this unpalatable conclusion has led to scholars, includ- ing this author, attempting to circumvent the conflation of logocentric ideology and dramatic form in Lehmann’s own analysis, by extraditing x Foreword playwrights from the dramatic to the postdramatic over recent years.16 This has been justified primarily on the grounds that writers such as Sarah Kane and Martin Crimp, the British playwrights most commonly assigned to the postdramatic, are themselves clearly engaging in precisely the activity that Lehmann describes as postdramatic – the ‘self-reflection, decomposition and separation of the elements of dramatic theatre’; yet such an argument does necessitate rejecting Lehmann’s own imperative for the postdramatic to position the ‘theatrical means beyond language […] equally alongside the text’.17 All attempts to conclusively categorize artistic forms, in any case, will inevitably be defeated by the vital and necessary resistance of artistic forms to totalizing categorization, but the choice of whether to prioritize Lehmann’s definition of the activity of the postdramatic over his insistence that it must not be led by a pre-existing text or vice versa does, I will now suggest, hold implications which go beyond an analysis of the specific playwrights concerned. What has begun to concern me is the possibility
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teacher Resource Pack I, Malvolio
    TEACHER RESOURCE PACK I, MALVOLIO WRITTEN & PERFORMED BY TIM CROUCH RESOURCES WRITTEN BY TIM CROUCH unicorntheatre.com timcrouchtheatre.co.uk I, MALVOLIO TEACHER RESOURCES INTRODUCTION Introduction by Tim Crouch I played the part of Malvolio in a production of Twelfth Night many years ago. Even though the audience laughed, for me, it didn’t feel like a comedy. He is a desperately unhappy man – a fortune spent on therapy would only scratch the surface of his troubles. He can’t smile, he can’t express his feelings; he is angry and repressed and deluded and intolerant, driven by hate and a warped sense of self-importance. His psychiatric problems seem curiously modern. Freud would have had a field day with him. So this troubled man is placed in a comedy of love and mistaken identity. Of course, his role in Twelfth Night would have meant something very different to an Elizabethan audience, but this is now – and his meaning has become complicated by our modern understanding of mental illness and madness. On stage in Twelfth Night, I found the audience’s laughter difficult to take. Malvolio suffers the thing we most dread – to be ridiculed when he is at his most vulnerable. He has no resolution, no happy ending, no sense of justice. His last words are about revenge and then he is gone. This, then, felt like the perfect place to start with his story. My play begins where Shakespeare’s play ends. We see Malvolio how he is at the end of Twelfth Night and, in the course of I, Malvolio, he repairs himself to the state we might have seen him in at the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One a Theoretical Background to the Figure of The
    19 Chapter One A Theoretical Background to the figure of the Artist in Literature and Theatre In an article published in Fall 2009, Csilla Bertha maintains that the central place an artist occupies within a work of art adds an additional dimension to plays, since the fictional artist’s point of view, attitudes to the world and evaluation of phenomena, may double or multiply the layers of the connections between art and life. She then adds: If an artist is chosen to be the protagonist of a play or novel, that choice naturally leads to the thematization of questions and dilemmas about the existence of art and the artist; relations between art and life, art/artist and the world; the nature of artistic creation; differences between ways of life, values, and views of ordinary people and artists; relations between individual and community, between the subject and objective reality; and many other similar issues.1 No doubt, with the advent of highly sophisticated and challenging notions such as Formalism2 and the death of the author,3 it is hard to conceive the figure of the artist without paying attention to the interrelations between art and life in which the ideal and reality, subject and object, constitute sharp contrasts. Traditionally, this dialectical relationship forms “binary 1 Csilla Bertha, “Visual Art and Artist in Contemporary Irish Drama”, Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies (HJEAS) v. 15, no. 2 (Fall 2009): 347. 2 Formalism is a Russian literary movement which originated in the second decade of the twentieth century. Its leading figures were both linguists and literary historians such as Boris Eikhenbaum (1886-1959), Roman Jakobson (1895-1982), Viktor Shklovsky (1893-1984), Boris Tomashevskij (1890-1957) and Jurij Tynjanov (1894-1943).
    [Show full text]
  • Come up to the Lab a Sciart Special
    024 on tourUK DRAMA & DANCE 2004 COME UP TO THE LAB A SCIART SPECIAL BOBBY BAKER_RANDOM DANCE_TOM SAPSFORD_CAROL BROWN_CURIOUS KIRA O’REILLY_THIRD ANGEL_BLAST THEORY_DUCKIE CHEEK BY JOWL_QUARANTINE_WEBPLAY_GREEN GINGER CIRCUS_DIARY DATES_UK FESTIVALS_COMPANY PROFILES On Tour is published bi-annually by the Performing Arts Department of the British Council. It is dedicated to bringing news and information about British drama and dance to an international audience. On Tour features articles written by leading and journalists and practitioners. Comments, questions or feedback should be sent to FEATURES [email protected] on tour 024 EditorJohn Daniel 20 ‘ALL THE WORK I DO IS UNCOMPLETED AND Assistant Editor Cathy Gomez UNFINISHED’ ART 4 Dominic Cavendish talks to Declan TheirSCI methodologies may vary wildly, but and Third Angel, whose future production, Donnellan about his latest production Performing Arts Department broadly speaking scientists and artists are Karoshi, considers the damaging effects that of Othello British Council WHAT DOES LONDON engaged in the same general pursuit: to make technology might have on human biorhythms 10 Spring Gardens SMELL LIKE? sense of the world and of our place within it. (see pages 4-7). London SW1A 2BN Louise Gray sniffs out the latest projects by Curious, In recent years, thanks, in part, to funding T +44 (0)20 7389 3010/3005 Kira O’Reilly and Third Angel Meanwhile, in the world of contemporary E [email protected] initiatives by charities like The Wellcome Trust dance, alongside Wayne McGregor, we cover www.britishcouncil.org/arts and NESTA (the National Endowment for the latest show from Carol Brown, which looks COME UP TO Science, Technology and the Arts), there’s THE LAB beyond the body to virtual reality, and Tom Drama and Dance Unit Staff 24 been a growing trend in the UK to narrow the Lyndsey Winship Sapsford, who’s exploring the effects of Director of Performing Arts THEATRE gap between arts and science professionals John Kieffer asks why UK hypnosis on his dancers (see pages 9-11).
    [Show full text]
  • Encountering Shakespeare with Tim Crouch
    “This is you”: Encountering Shakespeare with Tim Crouch by Sara Soncini By general consensus, Tim Crouch is one of the most innovative theatre-makers to have emerged on the UK scene during the last decade or so. His work has attracted considerable critical attention both nationally and internationally, giving rise to a sizeable and ever expanding body of academic analysis. Starting with his multi-award- winning production of An Oak Tree (2005), Crouch’s plays have toured extensively and they are regularly performed in translation in a wide range of European countries, where they have been invariably hailed as a token of the vigour and vibrancy of British new writing. The fact that roughly one half of Tim Crouch’s dramatic output to date is a reworking of Shakespearean sources is a telling indication of the continued centrality of his theatrical voice on the 21st-century stage. Yet while critics usually remark upon the continuities – in terms of objectives, methods and techniques – between Crouch’s Shakespeare project and the rest of his production (see e.g. Rebellato 2016), the specific cultural meaning of his adaptations as a form of creative engagement with Shakespeare has only been cursorily addressed in the available scholarship. This is arguably a consequence of the particular slant of the project and its perceived specialized nature. Now a cycle of five solo plays, Tim Crouch’s I, Shakespeare was initially instigated by a commission from the Brighton Festival to introduce Shakespeare to a young audience. The brief resulted in I, Caliban (2003), a retelling of Saggi/Ensayos/Essais/Essays Will forever young! Shakespeare & Contemporary Culture – 11/2017 22 The Tempest from the point of view of Shakespeare’s outcast for children aged 8+.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    ABSTRACTS AND BIOGRAPHIES Thursday, October 11, 2018 9.45 PANEL: Across Languages Chair: Claire Hélie (Lille University) 1. Maggie Rose (Milan University) Importing new British plays to Italy. Rethinking the role of the theatre translator Over the last three decades I have worked as a co-translator and a cultural mediator between the UK and Italy, bringing plays by Alan Bennett, Edward Bond, Caryl Churchill, Claire Dowie, David Greig, Kwame Kwei-Armah, Hanif Kureishi, Liz Lochhead, Sabrina Mahfouz, Rani Moorthy, among others,to the Italian stage. Bearing in mind a complex web of Italo-British relations, I will discuss how my strategies of cultural mediation have evolved over the years as a response to significant changes in the two theatre systems. I will explore why the task of finding a publisher and a producer\director for some British authors has been more difficult than for others, the stage and critical success of certain dramatists in Italy more limited. I will look specifically at the Italian ‘journeys’ of the following writers: Caryl Churchill and my co-translation of Top Girls (1986) and A Mouthful of Birds, Edward Bond and my co-translation of The War Plays for the 2006 Winter Olympics in Turin and Alan Bennett and my co-translation of The History Boys at Teatro Elfo Pucini from 2011-3013, at Teatro Elfo Puccini and national tours. Maggie Rose teaches British Theatre Studies and Performance at the University of Milan and spends part of the year in the UK for her writing and research. She is a member of the Scottish Society of Playwrights and her plays have been performed in the UK and in Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Theatre Company Annual Report 2011 Annual Report | Chairman’S Report 2011 Annual Report | Chairman’S Report
    2011 SYDNEY THEATRE COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT | CHAIRMAn’s RepoRT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT | CHAIRMAn’s RepoRT 2 3 2011 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT “I consider the three hours I spent on Saturday night … among the happiest of my theatregoing life.” Ben Brantley, The New York Times, on STC’s Uncle Vanya “I had never seen live theatre until I saw a production at STC. At first I was engrossed in the medium. but the more plays I saw, the more I understood their power. They started to shape the way I saw the world, the way I analysed social situations, the way I understood myself.” 2011 Youth Advisory Panel member “Every time I set foot on The Wharf at STC, I feel I’m HOME, and I’ve loved this company and this venue ever since Richard Wherrett showed me round the place when it was just a deserted, crumbling, rat-infested industrial pier sometime late 1970’s and a wonderful dream waiting to happen.” Jacki Weaver 4 5 2011 ANNUAL REPORT | THROUGH NUMBERS 2011 ANNUAL REPORT | THROUGH NUMBERS THROUGH NUMBERS 10 8 1 writers under commission new Australian works and adaptations sold out season of Uncle Vanya at the presented across the Company in 2011 Kennedy Center in Washington DC A snapshot of the activity undertaken by STC in 2011 1,310 193 100,000 5 374 hours of theatre actors employed across the year litre rainwater tank installed under national and regional tours presented hours mentoring teachers in our School The Wharf Drama program 1,516 450,000 6 4 200 weeks of employment to actors in 2011 The number of people STC and ST resident actors home theatres people on the payroll each week attracted into the Walsh Bay precinct, driving tourism to NSW and Australia 6 7 2011 ANNUAL REPORT | ARTISTIC DIRECTORs’ RepoRT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT | ARTISTIC DIRECTORs’ RepoRT Andrew Upton & Cate Blanchett time in German art and regular with STC – had a window of availability Resident Artists’ program again to embrace our culture.
    [Show full text]
  • David Greig's Theatre
    THE “POLETHICS” OF THE MEDIATED/TIZED SPECTATOR IN THE GLOBAL-TECHNOLOGIZED AGE: DAVID GREIG’S THEATRE Verónica Rodríguez Universidad de Barcelona Abstract: Contemporary Scottish playwright David Greig’s dramaturgy has been concerned with the massive changes wrought across the world by neoliberal globalization in the last two decades. A political triple turn comprising ethics, the media and the spectator, and a shift between the notion “‘mediatized’ reiterative ‘expectator’” to “mediated performing spectator” within the “polethic” frame of ‘relationality’ in Greig’s works are argued in this article. It is further argued that the plays examined (Damascus, The American Pilot, Brewers Fayre and Fragile) use productive strategies like diffusion, reversibility and interchangeability, which foreground the asymmetries of the global/technologized age “polethically” mediating the global performing spectator. Key Words: Globalization, David Greig, Media, Spectator, Ethics, Politics. Recibido: 18/07/2012 Aceptado: 05/09/2012 TRIPLE TURN: ETHICS, MEDIA & SPECTATORSHIP IN THE GLOBAL-TECHNOLOGIZED AGE In his short review of Michael Kustov’s Theatre@risk, David Greig states that “[t]he thrust of Kustow’s argument is that in a corporate, mediated, screened world the last public space – public in the true sense – is the theatre” (Glasgow Sunday Herald)1 adding that he shares “his passion and confidence that theatre is the necessary art form of the century” (ibid.). Greig’s theatre emerges as a creative response in this milieu by raising questions around the role of ethics, the media and spectators in the context of the global-technologized age when the idea of the nation is being 1 This review appears at the beginning of the 2000’s Methuen edition of Kustov’s Theare@risk.
    [Show full text]
  • F-1E3-56B457b217710.Pdf
    * THEATRE ET SPECTACLE VIVANT DANS LA REPUBLIQUE DU BONHEUR 2015 –SOMMAIRE– Première partie : avant la représentation I. Martin Crimp, Marcial di Fonzo Bo et Elise Vigier : la rencontre d'artistes contemporains p. 2 II. Titre, sous-titre, structure de la pièce : premières hypothèses p. 5 III. Une histoire de famille p. 7 IV. Le bonheur pour tous ? p. 9 V. Et sur scène ? p. 10 Annexes 1. Petits dialogues p. 11 2. Oncle Bob : monologue p. 12 3. Page extraite de Dans la république du bonheur p. 13 4. Les personnages parlent du bonheur p. 14 « Pièces à vivre » : une série de dossiers pédagogiques conçus en partenariat par la Délégation Académique à l’Action Culturelle de l’Académie de Caen et les structures théâtrales de l’académie à l’occasion de spectacles accueillis ou créés en Région Basse-Normandie. Le théâtre est vivant, il est créé, produit, accueilli souvent bien près des établissements scolaires ; les dossiers « Pièces à vivre », construits par des enseignants en collaboration étroite avec l’équipe de création, visent à fournir aux professeurs des ressources pour exploiter au mieux en classe un spectacle vu. Divisés en deux parties, destinées l’une à préparer le spectacle en amont, l’autre à analyser la représentation, ils proposent un ensemble de pistes que les enseignants peuvent utiliser intégralement ou partiellement. Retrouvez ce dossier, ainsi que d’autres de la même collection et des ressources pour l’enseignement du théâtre sur le site de la Délégation Académique à l’action Culturelle de l’Académie de Caen : http://www.discip.ac-caen.fr/aca/ Délégation Académique à l’Action Culturelle de Caen 1 * THEATRE ET SPECTACLE VIVANT DANS LA REPUBLIQUE DU BONHEUR 2015 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dilemma of the Artist in Contemporary British Theatre: a Theoretical Background
    Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts - Volume 2, Issue 4 – Pages 243-258 The Dilemma of the Artist in Contemporary British Theatre: A Theoretical Background By Majeed Mohammed Midhin Clare Finburgh† The present paper tackles the dilemma of the artist in contemporary British theatre. It commences by introducing a clear-cut definition of the dilemma of the artist in literature.There are certainly many dilemmas for the artist. One of the most painful is social: How can the artist function as a member of a certain community and, at the same time, retain the distinctiveness of his/her role as an outsider whose social usefulness is based on his/her chronic estrangement from the ordinary concerns of society?; by this, I mean the perplexing dilemma in which the artist finds in his/her struggle to reconcile private desire to public expectation. A second dilemma of the artist is economic: How can artists practice their art? This dilemma has two facets. On the one hand it is related to subsidy the art received from public budget. On the other, it is the materialistic norms of the society in which the artist has immersed himself/herself. Indeed, the dilemma that faces radical artists nowadays is that the popular forms of communication are often controlled by conventional and commercial forces at work in society. However, it is not only money which is the source of the artist's economic dilemma, but rather the existence or the paucity of good audiences. Under such perilous circumstances, the artist's genuine dilemma lies in confronting the Zeitgeist, the general intellectual and moral tendencies of an era, which can be evasive and intangible.
    [Show full text]
  • Laughing out Young: Laughter in Evan Placey's Girls Like That And
    Miranda Revue pluridisciplinaire du monde anglophone / Multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal on the English- speaking world 19 | 2019 Rethinking Laughter in Contemporary Anglophone Theatre Laughing Out Young: Laughter in Evan Placey’s Girls Like That and Other Plays for Teenagers (2016) Claire Hélie Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/20064 DOI: 10.4000/miranda.20064 ISSN: 2108-6559 Publisher Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès Printed version Date of publication: 7 October 2019 Electronic reference Claire Hélie, “Laughing Out Young: Laughter in Evan Placey’s Girls Like That and Other Plays for Teenagers (2016)”, Miranda [Online], 19 | 2019, Online since 09 October 2019, connection on 16 February 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/20064 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ miranda.20064 This text was automatically generated on 16 February 2021. Miranda is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Laughing Out Young: Laughter in Evan Placey’s Girls Like That and Other Plays... 1 Laughing Out Young: Laughter in Evan Placey’s Girls Like That and Other Plays for Teenagers (2016) Claire Hélie 1 Evan Placey1 is a Canadian-British playwright who writes for young audiences; but unlike playwrights such as Edward Bond, Dennis Kelly or Tim Crouch, he writes for young audiences only. Some of his plays target young children, like WiLd! (2016), the monologue of an 8-year-old boy with ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder), other young adults, like Consensual (2015), which explores the grey area between rape and consent. His favourite audience remain teenagers and four of the plays he wrote for them were collected in Girls Like That and Other Plays for Teenagers in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Figures of Political Resistance for the British Stage Vol1.Pdf
    Writing Figures of Political Resistance for the British Stage Volume One (of Two) Matthew John Midgley PhD University of York Theatre, Film and Television September 2015 Writing Figures of Resistance for the British Stage Abstract This thesis explores the process of writing figures of political resistance for the British stage prior to and during the neoliberal era (1980 to the present). The work of established political playwrights is examined in relation to the socio-political context in which it was produced, providing insights into the challenges playwrights have faced in creating characters who effectively resist the status quo. These challenges are contextualised by Britain’s imperial history and the UK’s ongoing participation in newer forms of imperialism, the pressures of neoliberalism on the arts, and widespread political disengagement. These insights inform reflexive analysis of my own playwriting. Chapter One provides an account of the changing strategies and dramaturgy of oppositional playwriting from 1956 to the present, considering the strengths of different approaches to creating figures of political resistance and my response to them. Three models of resistance are considered in Chapter Two: that of the individual, the collective, and documentary resistance. Each model provides a framework through which to analyse figures of resistance in plays and evaluate the strategies of established playwrights in negotiating creative challenges. These models are developed through subsequent chapters focussed upon the subjects tackled in my plays. Chapter Three looks at climate change and plays responding to it in reflecting upon my creative process in The Ends. Chapter Four explores resistance to the Iraq War, my own military experience and the challenge of writing autobiographically.
    [Show full text]
  • New Scottish Drama at Home and in the German-Speaking Theatre
    Michael Raab (Frankfurt) No More Beautiful Losers: New Scottish Drama at Home and in the German-Speaking Theatre About the reception of new Scottish plays in London, the dramatist David Greig writes that the critics there “feel most comfortable with Scottish work when it fits their understanding of Scots – violent and funny poor people who are slightly frightening. The softer voices, the poetic voices, and the experimental voices are met with bemusement, apathy or patronising disdain”. But, surprisingly, on a 2002 list of ten playwrights thought to be “the future of British theatre” by The Guardian four were Scots. Most of their works were staged at the Traverse Theatre, Scotland’s equivalent to the Royal Court. The establishment of a non-building-based new National Theatre for Scotland further boosted an already lively scene. In a small nation of five million people 600,000 regularly go to the theatre. Joyce McMillan, critic for The Scotsman, emphasizes the importance of devolution after the successful referendum in 1997 for the development of Scottish playwriting. In her opinion it gave young authors the confidence to say, “We’re cool enough, postmodern enough and mature enough not to be spending a lot of time thinking about being Scottish.” The essay examines the enormous formal breadth of new Scottish drama from its ‘annus mirabilis’ in 2002 until today, as well as its reception in the German-speaking theatre. Describes you as a pair of ‘Celtic lyricists’, you could sue the buggers. (John Byrne: Colquhoun and MacBryde) Joyce McMillan, critic for The Scotsman, emphasizes the importance of devolution after the successful referendum in 1997 for the development of Scottish playwriting.
    [Show full text]