CDK8-Novel Therapeutic Opportunities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Cryoelectron Microscopy Structure of the Human CDK-Activating Kinase
The cryoelectron microscopy structure of the human CDK-activating kinase Basil J. Grebera,b,1,2, Juan M. Perez-Bertoldic, Kif Limd, Anthony T. Iavaronee, Daniel B. Tosoa, and Eva Nogalesa,b,d,f,2 aCalifornia Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; bMolecular Biophysics and Integrative Bio-Imaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720; cBiophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; dDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; eQB3/Chemistry Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; and fHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Edited by Seth A. Darst, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, and approved August 4, 2020 (received for review May 14, 2020) The human CDK-activating kinase (CAK), a complex composed of phosphoryl transfer (11). However, in addition to cyclin binding, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 7, cyclin H, and MAT1, is a critical full activation of cell cycle CDKs requires phosphorylation of the regulator of transcription initiation and the cell cycle. It acts by T-loop (9, 12). In animal cells, these activating phosphorylations phosphorylating the C-terminal heptapeptide repeat domain of are carried out by CDK7 (13, 14), itself a cyclin-dependent ki- the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) subunit RPB1, which is an important nase whose activity depends on cyclin H (14). regulatory event in transcription initiation by Pol II, and it phos- In human and other metazoan cells, regulation of transcription phorylates the regulatory T-loop of CDKs that control cell cycle initiation by phosphorylation of the Pol II-CTD and phosphor- progression. -
Gene Expression Profile of THZ1-Treated Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell Lines Indicates Its Involvement in the Inhibition of the Cell Cycle
460 Original Article Gene expression profile of THZ1-treated nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines indicates its involvement in the inhibition of the cell cycle Lijuan Gao1,2,3#, Shuang Xia4#, Kunyi Zhang1,2,3#, Chengguang Lin1,2,3, Xuyu He4, Ying Zhang4 1Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; 2State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; 4Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China Contributions: (I) Conception and design: L Gao, S Xia, K Zhang; (II) Administrative support: X He, Y Zhang; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: L Gao, S Xia, K Zhang; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: C Lin; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: C Lin, X He, Y Zhang; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. #The authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to: Xuyu He; Ying Zhang. Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan 2nd road, Guangzhou 510080, China. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]. Background: The aim of this study was to identify downstream target genes and pathways regulated by THZ1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: The gene expression profile of GSE95750 in two NPC cell lines, untreated group and treated with THZ1 group, was analyzed. -
Proteomic Analysis of the Mediator Complex Interactome in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Received: 26 October 2016 Henriette Uthe, Jens T
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Proteomic Analysis of the Mediator Complex Interactome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Received: 26 October 2016 Henriette Uthe, Jens T. Vanselow & Andreas Schlosser Accepted: 25 January 2017 Here we present the most comprehensive analysis of the yeast Mediator complex interactome to date. Published: 27 February 2017 Particularly gentle cell lysis and co-immunopurification conditions allowed us to preserve even transient protein-protein interactions and to comprehensively probe the molecular environment of the Mediator complex in the cell. Metabolic 15N-labeling thereby enabled stringent discrimination between bona fide interaction partners and nonspecifically captured proteins. Our data indicates a functional role for Mediator beyond transcription initiation. We identified a large number of Mediator-interacting proteins and protein complexes, such as RNA polymerase II, general transcription factors, a large number of transcriptional activators, the SAGA complex, chromatin remodeling complexes, histone chaperones, highly acetylated histones, as well as proteins playing a role in co-transcriptional processes, such as splicing, mRNA decapping and mRNA decay. Moreover, our data provides clear evidence, that the Mediator complex interacts not only with RNA polymerase II, but also with RNA polymerases I and III, and indicates a functional role of the Mediator complex in rRNA processing and ribosome biogenesis. The Mediator complex is an essential coactivator of eukaryotic transcription. Its major function is to communi- cate regulatory signals from gene-specific transcription factors upstream of the transcription start site to RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) and to promote activator-dependent assembly and stabilization of the preinitiation complex (PIC)1–3. The yeast Mediator complex is composed of 25 subunits and forms four distinct modules: the head, the middle, and the tail module, in addition to the four-subunit CDK8 kinase module (CKM), which can reversibly associate with the 21-subunit Mediator complex. -
Cytotoxic Effects and Changes in Gene Expression Profile
Toxicology in Vitro 34 (2016) 309–320 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicology in Vitro journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxinvit Fusarium mycotoxin enniatin B: Cytotoxic effects and changes in gene expression profile Martina Jonsson a,⁎,MarikaJestoib, Minna Anthoni a, Annikki Welling a, Iida Loivamaa a, Ville Hallikainen c, Matti Kankainen d, Erik Lysøe e, Pertti Koivisto a, Kimmo Peltonen a,f a Chemistry and Toxicology Research Unit, Finnish Food Safety Authority (Evira), Mustialankatu 3, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland b Product Safety Unit, Finnish Food Safety Authority (Evira), Mustialankatu 3, FI-00790 Helsinki, c The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Rovaniemi Unit, P.O. Box 16, FI-96301 Rovaniemi, Finland d Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 20, FI-00014, Finland e Plant Health and Biotechnology, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy, Høyskoleveien 7, NO -1430 Ås, Norway f Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency (Tukes), Opastinsilta 12 B, FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland article info abstract Article history: The mycotoxin enniatin B, a cyclic hexadepsipeptide produced by the plant pathogen Fusarium,isprevalentin Received 3 December 2015 grains and grain-based products in different geographical areas. Although enniatins have not been associated Received in revised form 5 April 2016 with toxic outbreaks, they have caused toxicity in vitro in several cell lines. In this study, the cytotoxic effects Accepted 28 April 2016 of enniatin B were assessed in relation to cellular energy metabolism, cell proliferation, and the induction of ap- Available online 6 May 2016 optosis in Balb 3T3 and HepG2 cells. The mechanism of toxicity was examined by means of whole genome ex- fi Keywords: pression pro ling of exposed rat primary hepatocytes. -
The Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 8 Module Sterically Blocks Mediator Interactions with RNA Polymerase II
The cyclin-dependent kinase 8 module sterically blocks Mediator interactions with RNA polymerase II Hans Elmlund*†, Vera Baraznenok‡, Martin Lindahl†, Camilla O. Samuelsen§, Philip J. B. Koeck*¶, Steen Holmberg§, Hans Hebert*ʈ, and Claes M. Gustafsson‡ʈ *Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet and School of Technology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology, Novum, SE-141 87 Huddinge, Sweden; †Department of Molecular Biophysics, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden; ‡Division of Metabolic Diseases, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, SE-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden; §Department of Genetics, Institute of Molecular Biology, Oester Farimagsgade 2A, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark; and ¶University College of Southern Stockholm, SE-141 57 Huddinge, Sweden Communicated by Roger D. Kornberg, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, August 28, 2006 (received for review February 21, 2006) CDK8 (cyclin-dependent kinase 8), along with CycC, Med12, and Here, we use the S. pombe system to investigate the molecular Med13, form a repressive module (the Cdk8 module) that prevents basis for the distinct functional properties of S and L Mediator. RNA polymerase II (pol II) interactions with Mediator. Here, we We find that the Cdk8 module binds to the pol II-binding cleft report that the ability of the Cdk8 module to prevent pol II of Mediator, where it sterically blocks interactions with the interactions is independent of the Cdk8-dependent kinase activity. polymerase. In contrast to earlier assumptions, the Cdk8 kinase We use electron microscopy and single-particle reconstruction to activity is dispensable for negative regulation of pol II interac- demonstrate that the Cdk8 module forms a distinct structural tions with Mediator. -
COFACTORS of the P65- MEDIATOR COMPLEX
COFACTORS OF THE April 5 p65- MEDIATOR 2011 COMPLEX Honors Thesis Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry NICHOLAS University of Colorado at Boulder VICTOR Faculty Advisor: Dylan Taatjes, PhD PARSONNET Committee Members: Rob Knight, PhD; Robert Poyton, PhD Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 The Mediator Complex ............................................................................................................................. 6 The NF-κB Transcription Factor ................................................................................................................ 8 Hypothesis............................................................................................................................................... 10 Results ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Discussion.................................................................................................................................................... 15 p65-only factors ...................................................................................................................................... 16 p65-enriched factors .............................................................................................................................. -
Loss of TRIM33 Causes Resistance to BET Bromodomain Inhibitors Through MYC- and TGF-Β–Dependent Mechanisms
Loss of TRIM33 causes resistance to BET PNAS PLUS bromodomain inhibitors through MYC- and TGF-β–dependent mechanisms Xiarong Shia, Valia T. Mihaylovaa, Leena Kuruvillaa, Fang Chena, Stephen Vivianoa, Massimiliano Baldassarrea, David Sperandiob, Ruben Martinezb, Peng Yueb, Jamie G. Batesb, David G. Breckenridgeb, Joseph Schlessingera,1, Benjamin E. Turka,1, and David A. Calderwooda,c,1 aDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520; bGilead Sciences, Foster City, CA 94404; and cDepartment of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520 Contributed by Joseph Schlessinger, May 24, 2016 (sent for review December 22, 2015; reviewed by Gary L. Johnson and Michael B. Yaffe) Bromodomain and extraterminal domain protein inhibitors (BETi) not characterized by genetic alterations in BET proteins. One key hold great promise as a novel class of cancer therapeutics. Because mechanism by which BETi suppress growth and survival of at least acquired resistance typically limits durable responses to targeted some types of cancer cells is by preferentially repressing tran- therapies, it is important to understand mechanisms by which scription of the proto-oncogene MYC, which is often under the tumor cells adapt to BETi. Here, through pooled shRNA screening control of BRD4 (5, 10, 12, 18). Thus, BETi may provide a new of colorectal cancer cells, we identified tripartite motif-containing mechanism to target MYC and other oncogenic transcription fac- protein 33 (TRIM33) as a factor promoting sensitivity to BETi. We tors, which lack obvious binding pockets for small molecules and are demonstrate that loss of TRIM33 reprograms cancer cells to a more thus typically considered to be “undruggable.” resistant state through at least two mechanisms. -
Regulatory Functions of the Mediator Kinases CDK8 and CDK19 Charli B
TRANSCRIPTION 2019, VOL. 10, NO. 2, 76–90 https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2018.1556915 REVIEW Regulatory functions of the Mediator kinases CDK8 and CDK19 Charli B. Fant and Dylan J. Taatjes Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The Mediator-associated kinases CDK8 and CDK19 function in the context of three additional Received 19 September 2018 proteins: CCNC and MED12, which activate CDK8/CDK19 kinase function, and MED13, which Revised 13 November 2018 enables their association with the Mediator complex. The Mediator kinases affect RNA polymerase Accepted 20 November 2018 II (pol II) transcription indirectly, through phosphorylation of transcription factors and by control- KEYWORDS ling Mediator structure and function. In this review, we discuss cellular roles of the Mediator Mediator kinase; enhancer; kinases and mechanisms that enable their biological functions. We focus on sequence-specific, transcription; RNA DNA-binding transcription factors and other Mediator kinase substrates, and how CDK8 or CDK19 polymerase II; chromatin may enable metabolic and transcriptional reprogramming through enhancers and chromatin looping. We also summarize Mediator kinase inhibitors and their therapeutic potential. Throughout, we note conserved and divergent functions between yeast and mammalian CDK8, and highlight many aspects of kinase module function that remain enigmatic, ranging from potential roles in pol II promoter-proximal pausing to liquid-liquid phase separation. Introduction and MED13L associate in a mutually exclusive fash- ion with MED12 and MED13 [12], and their poten- The CDK8 kinase exists in a 600 kDa complex tial functional distinctions remain unclear. known as the CDK8 module, which consists of four CDK8 is considered both an oncogene [13–15] proteins (CDK8, CCNC, MED12, MED13). -
Cell Cycle–Regulated Phosphorylation of P220 by Cyclin E/Cdk2 in Cajal Bodies Promotes Histone Gene Transcription
Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 4, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cell cycle–regulated phosphorylation of p220NPAT by cyclin E/Cdk2 in Cajal bodies promotes histone gene transcription Tianlin Ma,1,8 Brian A. Van Tine,4,5,8 Yue Wei,2 Michelle D. Garrett,6 David Nelson,7 Peter D. Adams,7 Jin Wang,1,3 Jun Qin,1,3 Louise T. Chow,4 and J. Wade Harper1,2,9 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, 3Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA; 4Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, 5Department of Pathology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA; 6CRC Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, SM2 5NG, United Kingdom; 7Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA Cyclin E/Cdk2 acts at the G1/S-phase transition to promote the E2F transcriptional program and the initiation of DNA synthesis. To explore further how cyclin E/Cdk2 controls S-phase events, we examined the subcellular localization of the cyclin E/Cdk2 interacting protein p220NPAT and its regulation by phosphorylation. p220 is localized to discrete nuclear foci. Diploid fibroblasts in Go and G1 contain two p220 foci, whereas S- and G2-phase cells contain primarily four p220 foci. Cells in metaphase and telophase have no detectable focus. p220 foci contain cyclin E and are coincident with Cajal bodies (CBs), subnuclear organelles that associate with histone gene clusters on chromosomes 1 and 6. Interestingly, p220 foci associate with chromosome 6 throughout the cell cycle and with chromosome 1 during S phase. -
MED12 Mutations Link Intellectual Disability Syndromes with Dysregulated GLI3-Dependent Sonic Hedgehog Signaling
MED12 mutations link intellectual disability syndromes with dysregulated GLI3-dependent Sonic Hedgehog signaling Haiying Zhoua, Jason M. Spaethb, Nam Hee Kimb, Xuan Xub, Michael J. Friezc, Charles E. Schwartzc, and Thomas G. Boyerb,1 aDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94270; bDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229; and cGreenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, SC 29646 Edited by Robert G. Roeder, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, and approved September 13, 2012 (received for review December 20, 2011) Recurrent missense mutations in the RNA polymerase II Mediator divergent “tail” and “kinase” modules through which most activa- subunit MED12 are associated with X-linked intellectual disability tors and repressors target Mediator. The kinase module, compris- (XLID) and multiple congenital anomalies, including craniofacial, ing MED12, MED13, CDK8, and cyclin C, has been ascribed both musculoskeletal, and behavioral defects in humans with FG (or activating and repressing functions and exists in variable association Opitz-Kaveggia) and Lujan syndromes. However, the molecular with Mediator, implying that its regulatory role is restricted to a mechanism(s) underlying these phenotypes is poorly understood. subset of RNA polymerase II transcribed genes. Here we report that MED12 mutations R961W and N1007S causing Within the Mediator kinase module, MED12 is a critical trans- FG and Lujan syndromes, respectively, disrupt a Mediator-imposed ducer of regulatory information conveyed by signal-activated transcription factors linked to diverse developmental pathways, constraint on GLI3-dependent Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling. We including the EGF, Notch, Wnt, and Hedgehog pathways (10–12). -
Pharmacodynamic Effects of Seliciclib, an Orally Administered
Cancer Therapy: Clinical Pharmacodynamic Effects of Seliciclib, an Orally Administered Cell Cycle Modulator, in Undifferentiated Nasopharyngeal Cancer Wen-Son Hsieh,4 Ross Soo,1Bee-Keow Peh,2 Thomas Loh,4 Difeng Dong,3 Donny Soh,5 Lim-SoonWong,3,5 Simon Green,6 Judy Chiao,6 Chun-Ying Cui,1Yo k e -F o n g L a i , 4 Soo-Chin Lee,1Benjamin Mow,1 Richie Soong,2 Manuel Salto-Tellez,2 and Boon-Cher Goh1, 2 Abstract Purpose: Cell cycle dysregulation resulting in expression of antiapoptotic genes and uncontrolled proliferation is a feature of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The pharmacodynamic effects of seliciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, were studied in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Experimental Design: Patients with treatment-naI«ve locally advanced nasopharyngeal carci- noma received seliciclib at 800 mg or 400 mg twice daily on days1 to 3 and 8 to12.Paired tumor samples obtained at baseline and on day 13 were assessed by light microscopy, immunohisto- chemistry, and transcriptionalprofiling using real-time PCR low-density array consisting of apanel of 380 genes related to cell cycle inhibition, apoptosis, signal transduction, and cell proliferation. Results: At 800 mg bd, one patient experienced grade 3 liver toxicity and another had grade 2 vomiting; no significant toxicities were experienced in 13 patients treated at 400 mg bd. Seven of fourteen evaluable patients had clinical evidence of tumor reduction. Some of these responses were associated with increased tumor apoptosis, necrosis, and decreases in plasma EBV DNA posttreatment. Reduced protein expression of Mcl-1, cyclin D1, phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein pRB (T821), and significant transcriptional down-regulation of genes related to cellular proliferation and survival were shown in some patients posttreatment, indicative of cell cycle modulation by seliciclib, more specifically inhibition of cdk2/cyclin E, cdk7/cyclin H, and cdk9/cyclinT. -
Cyclin Dl/Cdk4 Regulates Retinoblastoma Protein- Mediated Cell Cycle Arrest by Site-Specific Phosphorylation Lisa Connell-Crowley,* J
Molecular Biology of the Cell Vol. 8, 287-301, February 1997 Cyclin Dl/Cdk4 Regulates Retinoblastoma Protein- mediated Cell Cycle Arrest by Site-specific Phosphorylation Lisa Connell-Crowley,* J. Wade Harper,* and David W. Goodrich"t *Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030; and tDepartment of Tumor Biology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 Submitted October 9, 1996; Accepted November 22, 1996 Monitoring Editor: J. Michael Bishop The retinoblastoma protein (pRb) inhibits progression through the cell cycle. Although pRb is phosphorylated when G1 cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are active, the mech- anisms underlying pRb regulation are unknown. In vitro phosphorylation by cyclin Dl /Cdk4 leads to inactivation of pRb in a microinjection-based in vivo cell cycle assay. In contrast, phosphorylation of pRb by Cdk2 or Cdk3 in complexes with A- or E-type cyclins is not sufficient to inactivate pRb function in this assay, despite extensive phos- phorylation and conversion to a slowly migrating "hyperphosphorylated form." The differential effects of phosphorylation on pRb function coincide with modification of distinct sets of sites. Serine 795 is phosphorylated efficiently by Cdk4, even in the absence of an intact LXCXE motif in cyclin D, but not by Cdk2 or Cdk3. Mutation of serine 795 to alanine prevents pRb inactivation by Cdk4 phosphorylation in the microinjection assay. This study identifies a residue whose phosphorylation is critical for inactivation of pRb-mediated growth suppression, and it indicates that hyperphosphorylation and inactivation of pRb are not necessarily synonymous. INTRODUCTION pRb is recognized by its characteristic decrease in electrophoretic mobility, and conditions that favor cell The retinoblastoma protein (pRb) functions to con- proliferation favor the appearance of these slower mi- strain cell proliferation and exerts its effects during the grating forms (Cobrinik et al., 1992; Hinds et al., 1992).