DOCSLIB.ORG

Renewable Energy System Integration - Challenges & Measures for RE Penetration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Renewable Energy System Integration - Challenges & Measures for RE Penetration º Renewable Energy System Integration - Challenges & Measures for RE Penetration - Final Report July 31th, 2019 I CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Measures ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Study Team Members ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.5 Results of survey ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.5.1 Demand and Supply Balance ...................................................................................................... 6 1.5.2 Network Enhancement ............................................................................................................... 7 1.5.3 Power Markets ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.5.4 Technical Issues ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.5.5 Political Issues ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.5.6 Innovation .................................................................................................................................... 8 1.5.7 Best Practice .............................................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Hidden Costs ..................................................................................................................................... 11 1.7 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 15 1.8 Need of Hidden (Grid-level) Cost Reduction .............................................................................. 15 1.9 Method of Hidden Cost Sharing .................................................................................................... 16 1.9.1 Evaluation of renewables’ role and location in the grid ..................................................... 16 1.9.2 Method of incremental cost for maintaining power quality due to RE integration ....... 16 1.10 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................... 17 2. Survey Results .......................................................................................................................................... 18 2.1 Profiles of Power Systems ................................................................................................................. 18 2.1.1 Electrical Energy Trend ............................................................................................................. 18 2.1.2 Electrical Facilities .................................................................................................................... 19 2.1.3 Reliability .................................................................................................................................. 20 2.1.4 Power Systems Planning ........................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Current Status of RE Penetration and Future Prospect ................................................................ 30 2.2.1 Demand Forecast ..................................................................................................................... 30 2.2.2 Power Development Plans ....................................................................................................... 30 2.2.3 Transmission Development Plan ............................................................................................... 31 2.2.4 Integration of Renewables ..................................................................................................... 37 2.2.5 Power Market ............................................................................................................................ 37 2.3 Challenges on Technical Issues caused by RE Penetration ........................................................ 41 2.3.1 Output fluctuation .................................................................................................................. 41 2.3.2 Increase in uncertainty caused by DER .................................................................................. 43 2.3.3 Ancillary services .................................................................................................................... 43 2.3.4 Difficulty of demand prediction due to integration of DERs ................................................ 44 2.3.5 Challenges in the transmission network planning .............................................................. 45 2.3.6 Maintaining distribution network voltage ........................................................................... 46 2.3.7 Reverse Power Flow ............................................................................................................... 47 2.3.8 System inertia problem .......................................................................................................... 47 2.3.9 Complications with protection and control systems (PCS) ............................................. 48 2.3.10 Voltage Flicker ........................................................................................................................ 48 2.4 Challenges in Political Issues caused by RE Penetration .......................................................... 49 2.4.1 Subsidies ................................................................................................................................... 49 2.4.2 Market Design ......................................................................................................................... 49 I 2.4.3 Wide area coordination system operation .......................................................................... 50 2.4.4 Curtailment of VRE ................................................................................................................ 50 2.4.5 Connect and Manage .............................................................................................................. 51 2.4.6 Reuse, Recycle ........................................................................................................................ 53 2.5 Innovations ....................................................................................................................................... 54 2.5.1 R&D .......................................................................................................................................... 54 2.5.2 Required technologies and innovations for integration of VREs .................................... 55 2.6 Best Practices for mitigating challenges ...................................................................................... 57 2.6.1 Ongoing projects ..................................................................................................................... 57 2.6.2 Field tests ................................................................................................................................. 69 3. Hidden Costs and Cost Sharing ............................................................................................................. 74 3.1 Hidden Costs ...................................................................................................................................... 79 3.2 Cost Sharing ..................................................................................................................................... 84 4. References ............................................................................................................................................ 87 II 1. Executive Summary 1.1 Background A majority of Asian countries are now putting RE at the centre of future energy development plans. They have also started R&D in electricity storage technologies, mainly focusing on batteries, which will be an essential tool in order to mitigate RE’s output intermittency and maintain grid stability and power quality for customers. This fact is reflected in the outcome of the 2017 Issues Survey in the Asian region. RE integration is the top “Need to Action” issue and Energy Storage has jumped up to the most critical uncertainty. Some Asian countries have already encountered problems due to RE penetration and developed measures to mitigate them. It is also expected that most Asian countries will face new challenges due to greater penetration of RE in the near future. According to the IEA, RE interconnection levels are categorised into Phase 1 through Phase 4 depending on how much impact is experienced in the power system. Each power utility in Japan, together
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Japan Coal Phase-Out: the Path to Phase-Out by 2030 Summary: Japan Should Completely Phase out Coal by 2030
    Japan Coal Phase-Out: The Path to Phase-Out by 2030 Summary: Japan should completely phase out coal by 2030. █ Coal-fired power generation emits more carbon dioxide (CO2) than any other method of generating electricity. In order to achieve net zero emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) as called for under the Paris Agreement, it is crucial to quickly decarbonize our energy sources. According to several research reports, that means we need to completely phase Japan Coal Phase-Out: out coal power plants, which obviously means halting new coal plant construction and also strategically retiring existing plants. For coal-fired power generation in Japan, the country must cancel all current planning for new construction, and also retire all existing coal The Path to Phase-Out by 2030 power plants by 2030 █ There were 117 units at existing coal power plants in Japan as of April 2018, based on Japan Coal Phase-Out: The Path to Phase-Out by 2030 Japan Coal Phase-Out: government statistics and publicly available information, and this number includes many older and inefficient plants that have been operating over 40 years. Contents █ The Japan 2030 Coal Phase-Out Plan presents a schedule to gradually retire all 117 units Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------p3 at existing coal power plants in Japan by 2030, starting with the oldest operating and least Main Report efficient plants. This plan is entirely achievable without threatening the electrical power 1. Status of Coal Power Generation in Japan ------------------------------p4 supply and without relying on nuclear power, if we take into account for the available (1) Coal power generation rose steadily since 1980 capacity of LNG and other power generation options, as well as the spread of renewable (2) Deluge of coal plant construction plans after TEPCO's energy and improvements in energy efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Aichi Prefecture
    Coordinates: 35°10′48.68″N 136°54′48.63″E Aichi Prefecture 愛 知 県 Aichi Prefecture ( Aichi-ken) is a prefecture of Aichi Prefecture Japan located in the Chūbu region.[1] The region of Aichi is 愛知県 also known as the Tōkai region. The capital is Nagoya. It is the focus of the Chūkyō metropolitan area.[2] Prefecture Japanese transcription(s) • Japanese 愛知県 Contents • Rōmaji Aichi-ken History Etymology Geography Cities Towns and villages Flag Symbol Mergers Economy International relations Sister Autonomous Administrative division Demographics Population by age (2001) Transport Rail People movers and tramways Road Airports Ports Education Universities Senior high schools Coordinates: 35°10′48.68″N Sports 136°54′48.63″E Baseball Soccer Country Japan Basketball Region Chūbu (Tōkai) Volleyball Island Honshu Rugby Futsal Capital Nagoya Football Government Tourism • Governor Hideaki Ōmura (since Festival and events February 2011) Notes Area References • Total 5,153.81 km2 External links (1,989.90 sq mi) Area rank 28th Population (May 1, 2016) History • Total 7,498,485 • Rank 4th • Density 1,454.94/km2 Originally, the region was divided into the two provinces of (3,768.3/sq mi) Owari and Mikawa.[3] After the Meiji Restoration, Owari and ISO 3166 JP-23 Mikawa were united into a single entity. In 187 1, after the code abolition of the han system, Owari, with the exception of Districts 7 the Chita Peninsula, was established as Nagoya Prefecture, Municipalities 54 while Mikawa combined with the Chita Peninsula and Flower Kakitsubata formed Nukata Prefecture. Nagoya Prefecture was renamed (Iris laevigata) to Aichi Prefecture in April 187 2, and was united with Tree Hananoki Nukata Prefecture on November 27 of the same year.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Quality in Aichi Prefecture
    Excerpt from the FY2013 White Paper on the Environment Environmental Quality in Aichi Prefecture Aichi 1 − Introduction − In 2013, Japan witnessed record heat and destructive typhoons, causing considerable damage throughout the nation. Some experts have argued that such abnormal weather phenomena can be attributed in part to global warming. Recently there has been growing health concern about fine particulate matter, known as PM2.5, an air pollutant found in toxic smog. To provide its residents with detailed information on PM2.5 levels, the Aichi Prefectural Government has reinforced its air quality monitoring system, including increased monitoring locations. Now that global environmental issues have a diverse range of impacts on our everyday lives, we need to strengthen public administration as regards environmental protection from a global perspective. In November 2014, the UNESCO World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) will be held here in Aichi Prefecture. This conference is of great significance, in that it will bring together those engaged in ESD from Japan and abroad to conduct lively discussions on this subject under the theme of “Creating a Better Future for the Planet.” The environmental awareness of the citizens of Aichi Prefecture has been enhanced through international environmental events hosted by Aichi, such as Expo 2005 Aichi Japan in 2005 and the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD-COP 10) held in 2010. We believe that the UNESCO World Conference on ESD will provide another springboard for the people of Aichi Prefecture to further increase environmental awareness and promote pro-environmental behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Data
    Business Strategy Special Feature ESG Activity Report Financial Information Corporate Data Corporate Data ▶Profile ▶Operating Area Head Office and Head Office JR Central operates the Tokaido Shinkansen, the Name CENTRAL JAPAN RAILWAY COMPANY (JR Central) Meieki 1-1-4, Nakamura-ku, Nagoya-shi, Other Main Offices Central Japan Railway Company (JR Central) Aichi 450-6101, JapanJR Central Towers main transportation artery linking Tokyo, Nagoya, Established April 1, 1987 Head Office (Tokyo) JR Central Shinagawa Building A Wing 2-1-85, and Osaka, and a network of 12 conventional lines Business activities Railways business, Affiliated businesses Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8204, Japan centered on the Nagoya and Shizuoka City areas. Key data (As of the end of March 2020) 0 500km Conventional Lines JR Central Taiko Building, Meieki 1-3-4, Capital 112.0 billion yen Area of Japan: Approx. 380,000km2 Operations Division Nakamura-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi 453-8520, Japan Population: 127 million Operating Revenues 1,436.9 billion yen (As of January 1, 2020) 4, Kurogane-cho, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka-shi, Shizuoka Branch Office Number of Shares Outstanding 206 million Shizuoka 420-0851, Japan Tokyo KyotoNagoya Share Listings Nagoya / Tokyo Stock Exchange JR-CENTRAL Shinkansen Conventional Lines Mie Regional Office Ust-Tsu 12F, 700, Hadokoro-cho, Tsu-shi, Shizuoka Shin-Osaka Number of Shareholders 92,828 Mie 514-0009, Japan JR-CENTRAL Number of Employees 18,282 Iida Regional Office 5356, Kami-Iida, Iida-shi, Nagano Inotani Operating Kilometers 1,970.8km 395-0000,Japan Number of Stations 405 Shinkansen Marunouchi Chuo Building, 1-9-1, Marunouchi, Number of Rolling Stock 4,828 Operations Division Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0005, Japan Double-and Multi-Tracked Section 55.1% (1,086.8km) Shiojiri Shin-Osaka Hankyu Building 10F, 1-1-1, Miyahara, Kansai Branch Office Electrified Section 76.7% (1,511.0km) Yodogawa-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka 532-0003, Japan CTC System Adoption Rate 97.5% (1,922.3km) Takayama Line Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • TAKETOYO Taketoyo Town Map Sports and Parks
    英 語 版 TAKETOYO Taketoyo Town Map Sports and Parks Nature Park MAP Kｰ2 There are many trees and various 自然公園 animals and plants. An observatory commands a panoramic view of Mikawa Bay and Ise Bay. A lot of people enjoy the outdoors here on weekends. ■Location Aza-Kamibesso Oaza-Fuki Taketoyo town Town Gymnasium MAP Hｰ6 ■Information 総合体育館 Town Planning Section (Toshi Keikaku-ka) of the Town Office A general sports facility for sports such as badminton, Phone: 0569-72-1111 basketball, table tennis, judo, kendo and a training room. Pond-Parks ■ Location 128 Aza-Shimizu Oaza-Higashi-odaka Taketoyo town 親水公園 ■ Business Hours 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. There are many reservoirs in Taketoyo. Kagari pond, Asari ■Closed Monday and the New Year holiday periods. pond, Kumano pond and Besso pond are kept as parks. You * Open on Monday if it is a public holiday. can enjoy walking around the reservoirs and watching birds. ■ Information Phone: 0569-72-1114 ■Information Town Planning Section (Toshi Keikaku-ka) of the Town Office Phone: 0569-72-1111 Asari Pond Park (Asari ike koen) Kumano Pond Park (Kumano ike koen) アサリ池公園 MAP E-6 熊野池公園 MAP H-6 Kagari Pond Park (Kagari ike koen) Besso Pond Park (Besso ike koen) 鹿狩池公園 MAP C-6 別曽池公園 MAP J-3 Athletic Park MAP Kｰ5 運動公園 There is a multipurpose sports field for baseball, football, etc. and a tennis court (artificial turf). The park is surrounded by nature. Outdoor Recreation Center in Shinshiro City ■Location 1-3 Aza-Kubara Oaza-Fuki Taketoyo town 野外活動センター ■Business Hours 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Mobility Scooters on Trains 168.1KB
    To passengers using mobility scooters: Make sure to read this before using JR Central lines Accessible trains and mobility scooters you can use Your mobility scooter’s size should not exceed 70cm in width and 120cm in length and height. (These are the same dimensions required for manual and other types of wheelchairs.) Mobility scooter users can board conventional line carriages that are both vestibule-free and step-free. *Limited express train carriages and some rapid or local train carriages that have vestibules or steps cannot accommodate mobility scooters. Meanwhile, you can board some carriages that are equipped with small steps. For details, inquire JR Central’s telephone information center (service is provided in Japanese)*1. The space that mobility scooter users can access on the Tokaido-Sanyo Shinkansen is limited to the multi-purpose room of Series N700 carriages. In addition to being within the dimensions mentioned above, mobility scooters that can be accommodated are only those with both of the following capabilities: (a) Capable of maneuvering right angles (i.e. Mobility scooters that meet both conditions (1) and (2)) (1) Can turn a 0.9m-wide, right angle within five adjustments (2) Can turn a 1.0m-wide, right angle without making any adjustments (b) Capable of turning 180 degrees Can turn 180 degrees within a space that’s less than 1.8m wide Your mobility scooter has these capabilities if the vehicle’s body is labeled with a sticker indicating turning capabilities (“Turning Capability ○○○”), a sticker indicating a star count (“Turning Capability ★★★”), or an “Advanced Mobility Scooter Sticker” issued by the Japan Assistive Products Evaluation Center or other institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The AGES 2003 Cohort Study in Aichi, Japan
    Cohort Profile: The AGES 2003 Cohort Study in Aichi, Japan The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Nishi, Akihiro, Katsunori Kondo, Hiroshi Hirai, and Ichiro Kawachi. 2011. “Cohort Profile: The AGES 2003 Cohort Study in Aichi, Japan.” Journal of Epidemiology 21 (2): 151-157. doi:10.2188/ jea.JE20100135. http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20100135. Published Version doi:10.2188/jea.JE20100135 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11879776 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA J Epidemiol 2011;21(2):151-157 doi:10.2188/jea.JE20100135 Study Profile Cohort Profile: The AGES 2003 Cohort Study in Aichi, Japan Akihiro Nishi1,2, Katsunori Kondo3, Hiroshi Hirai3, and Ichiro Kawachi1 1Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA 2Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan 3Center for Well-being and Society, Nihon Fukushi University, Nagoya, Japan Received September 9, 2010; accepted November 25, 2010; released online February 12, 2011 ABSTRACT Background: The longevity of Japanese is thought to be associated with psychosocial factors such as sense of coherence, social support, and social capital. However, the actual factors responsible and the extent of their contribution to individual health status are not known.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electric Power Industry in Japan 2019
    THE ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY IN THE ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY THE ELECTRIC POWER J APAN 2019 INDUSTRY IN JAPAN 2019 15-33, Shibaura 4-chome Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0023, Japan http://www.jepic.or.jp/ Printed in Japan with vegetable-based ink on recycled paper EPCo Distribution Areas and Frequency (As of January 2019) Member Companies (As of March 2019) Hokkaido Electric Power Co., Inc. The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc. 2, Higashi 1-chome, Odori, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8677, Japan 4-33, Komachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 730-8701, Japan http://www.hepco.co.jp/english/index.html http://www.energia.co.jp/e/index.html Tohoku Electric Power Co., Inc. Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc. 1-7-1 Honcho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8550, Japan 2-5, Marunouchi, Takamatsu, Kagawa 760-8573, Japan http://www.tohoku-epco.co.jp/english/index.html https://www.yonden.co.jp/english/index.html Hokkaido EPCo Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc. Kyushu Electric Power Co., Inc. 1-1-3, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8560, Japan 1-82, Watanabe-dori 2-chome, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka 810-8720, Japan http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/index-e.html http://www.kyuden.co.jp/en_index.html Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. The Okinawa Electric Power Co., Inc. 1, Higashi-shincho, Higashi-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 461-8680, Japan 2-1, Makiminato 5-chome, Urasoe, Okinawa 901-2602, Japan http://www.chuden.co.jp/english/index.html http://www.okiden.co.jp/en/ Hokuriku Electric Power Co. Electric Power Development Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • CSR Report 2009[PDF:5594KB]
    表面 Editorial Policy Chubu ElectricPowerGroupCSRReport2009 CONTENTS This CSR report provides an account of the CSR REPORT 2009 Chubu Electric Power Group’s corporate social Chubu Electric Power Group CSR Report 2009 Chubu Electric Power Group CSR Report responsibilities toward achieving a sustainable society. Through this report, we aim to communicate our efforts to our stakeholders, and at the same time heighten motivation within the Group to strengthen our CSR initiatives. The 2009 edition has been produced in Editorial Policy reference to external guidelines such as the “GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines 2006” Corporate Profile and the “Environmental Reporting Guidelines (FY2007 Version)” issued by the Ministry of the Chubu Electric Power Group Environment, to ensure this report contains all the information that is required in a CSR report. CSR in the Chubu Electric Power Group 1 We have also concentrated on including information mainly on activities of high interest Message from the President & Director 2 to our stakeholders and of strong importance to Highlights the Chubu Electric Power Group. An electronic version of this report and further Commitment to Nuclear Power Generation 4 details of our CSR activities are available on our Overseas Environmental Projects website. 8 Initiatives by Our Group Companies Scope of this report (1) C ENERGY’s ESCO Projects 10 Organizations (2) Chuden Wing’s Independence Support Program Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc., and the Chubu 11 Electric Power Group Companies Safe and Stable Supply of Electricity
    [Show full text]
  • JERA Corporate Profile
    To provide cutting edge solutions Mission to the world’s energy issues Through our global operations we bring the world’s leading energy solutions to Japan, helping to solve the energy issues facing the country. We seek to establish new energy supply models for Japan while also oering energy supply models established in Japan to other countries that face similar energy issues, helping to solve the world’s energy issues. Global leader in LNG and renewables, Visionsparking the transition to a clean energy economy As we look toward 2025, the energy solutions we oer will focus mainly on two businesses: the LNG value chain business and the large-scale renewable energy business. These businesses are complementary; renewable energy with variable power generation output is complemented by exible, clean LNG thermal power generation. With demand expected to grow globally, particularly in Asia, we aim to become a leader in these two businesses. Complementary Enhance Develop large-scale the LNG value chain renewable energy Expand optimization and trading Develop large-scale Provide stable, clean, renewable energy Operate thermal economical energy power stations that exibly Introduce storage batteries respond to uctuating demand 1 Kawagoe Thermal Power Station（Mie Prefecture） 2 TOP ME S SAGE A Global Company Aiming to Earn Spearheading the Realization of a Low-Carbon the Regard of the Global Energy Market Society as a Global Leader Laying and Be Indispensable to the People of the World the Foundation for the Future of Energy Chairman, Representative Director Toshihiro Sano President, Representative Director Satoshi Onoda Our company was established in April 2015 with the aim of creating a globally JERA’s mission is to provide cutting-edge solutions to the world’s energy competitive energy company in Japan based on a comprehensive alliance issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Half-Graben Inversion Tectonics Revealed by Gravity Modeling in the Mikawa Bay Region, Central Japan Ayumu Miyakawa* , Tomoya Abe, Tatsuya Sumita and Makoto Otsubo
    Miyakawa et al. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2020) 7:63 Progress in Earth and https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00376-6 Planetary Science RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Half-graben inversion tectonics revealed by gravity modeling in the Mikawa Bay Region, Central Japan Ayumu Miyakawa* , Tomoya Abe, Tatsuya Sumita and Makoto Otsubo Abstract The Mikawa Bay Region, central Japan, is characterized by many active faults recording Quaternary activities. It is, however, difficult to understand the overall tectonic character of the region due to a thick sedimentary cover. We report the first finding of Neogene basin inversion in southwest Japan by estimating the depth and structure of the basement surface in the Mikawa Bay Region by analyzing gravity data. Our gravity basement map and two- dimensional density-structure model automatically determined using the genetic algorithm revealed a half-graben bounded on the south by the north-dipping Utsumi Fault. The motion of the Utsumi Fault, which inverted from normal faulting during the Miocene to recent reverse faulting, indicated the inversion of the half-graben. The timing of the inversion of the fault motion, i.e., the reverse faulting of the Miocene normal fault, can be compared with an episode of basin inversion observed at the eastern margin of the Japan Sea, northeastern Japan. The Takahama Fault in the southwestern part of the Nishi–Mikawa Plain is considered to have formed as a result of the backthrust of the Utsumi Fault under inversion tectonics. If the Takahama Fault is indeed the backthrust fault of the Utsumi Fault, the root of the Takahama Fault may be deep such that the Takahama Fault is seismogenic and linked to the 1945 Mikawa earthquake.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Family Membership and Gender by Club MBR0018 As of June, 2009
    Summary of Family Membership and Gender by Club MBR0018 as of June, 2009 Club Fam. Unit Fam. Unit Club Ttl. Club Ttl. District Number Club Name HH's 1/2 Dues Females Male TOTAL District 334 A 24659 AGUI 0 0 1 43 44 District 334 A 24661 AMA 0 0 0 34 34 District 334 A 24662 ANJYO MINAMI 0 0 10 88 98 District 334 A 24663 ANJYO 0 0 0 76 76 District 334 A 24667 BISAI 0 0 0 29 29 District 334 A 24669 CHIRYU 0 0 0 81 81 District 334 A 24670 CHITA 0 0 1 35 36 District 334 A 24675 GAMAGORI 0 0 1 41 42 District 334 A 24680 HANDA 0 0 3 91 94 District 334 A 24681 HEKINAN 0 0 0 82 82 District 334 A 24685 ICHINOMIYA 0 0 3 76 79 District 334 A 24688 INAZAWA 2 2 0 58 58 District 334 A 24689 ICHINOMIYA NAKA 0 0 0 27 27 District 334 A 24690 INUYAMA 0 0 1 60 61 District 334 A 24691 ICHINOMIYA SOUTH 0 0 0 54 54 District 334 A 24696 KARIYA KINUURA 0 0 0 31 31 District 334 A 24698 KANIE 0 0 2 28 30 District 334 A 24700 KARIYA 0 0 0 56 56 District 334 A 24701 KASUGAI 0 0 0 64 64 District 334 A 24703 KIRA 0 0 0 45 45 District 334 A 24707 KOMAKI 0 0 6 57 63 District 334 A 24709 KONAN 0 0 0 102 102 District 334 A 24710 KOTA 0 0 1 26 27 District 334 A 24717 MIHAMA 0 0 1 49 50 District 334 A 24718 MINAMICHITA 0 0 1 37 38 District 334 A 24721 MIYOSHI AICHI 0 0 2 29 31 District 334 A 24728 NAGOYA KINJO 4 4 5 14 19 District 334 A 24729 NAGOYA HOST 0 0 3 40 43 District 334 A 24730 NAGOYA ATSUTA 0 0 0 25 25 District 334 A 24731 NAGOYA AOI 0 0 1 33 34 District 334 A 24732 NAGOYA EAST 0 0 1 35 36 District 334 A 24733 NAGOYA KITA 0 0 0 36 36 District 334 A 24734 NAGOYA
    [Show full text]