DOCSLIB.ORG

West Point Security Gate Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Point Security Gate Project West Point Security Gate Project Open House and Community Input Summary October 2013 Open House and Community Input Summary .................................................................. 1 Overview and Project Background ................................................................................... 3 Meeting Purpose ............................................................................................................... 4 Open House Format .......................................................................................................... 4 Common Themes from Input Received ............................................................................ 5 Staff Attendance ............................................................................................................... 9 For more information ....................................................................................................... 9 Appendix A. Open House Flipchart Notes ..................................................................... 10 Appendix B. Verbatim Input Received ........................................................................... 11 Page 2 of 49 Overview and Project Background On August 21, 2013, the King County Wastewater Treatment Division (WTD) and the City of Seattle Parks and Recreation (Seattle Parks) invited community members to an open house at the Discovery Park Visitor’s Center to learn about and discuss the agencies’ proposal to install a new security gate to control vehicle access to the West Point Treatment Plant, beach and parking area. The West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant (West Point) is located adjacent to Discovery Park along its northwestern bank. The West Point Treatment Plant has a long history in Magnolia. Prior to the completion of the primary treatment facility in 1966, a sewage disposal pipeline brought raw sewage from across the region onto the beach and into Puget Sound. Water quality along Seattle’s waterfront improved after the treatment plant became operational and Discovery Park was created in 1972. In 1996, the treatment plant was converted from primary to secondary treatment. During this upgrade, WTD reduced the plant size and limited shoreline facilities while improving public access to water and screening the plant from shoreline view. Access to West Point is via Discovery Park Boulevard, a two‐lane road that runs about 1.5 miles from the park entrance at 36th West and West Government Way to West Point and beyond to the beach areas and lighthouse. Vehicular parking at the beach is very limited and is available only by City of Seattle permit in order to preserve the beach environment and protect the lighthouse facility. Permits are available at the Discovery Park Visitor’s Center. However, other than signage describing the permit requirement, there is currently no mechanism for ensuring that park visitors obtain a permit prior to driving to the beach. The result of this is a crowding of vehicles in the beach area, particularly on good weather days, creating traffic problems and at times blocking access to the main entrance to West Point. Beach parking is intended to accommodate ten vehicles at a time, but there are times when up to 30 vehicles can be found parked in the area. In addition, vehicles can travel to the beach areas at night with no restriction. This has resulted in activity detrimental to the beach areas including illegal beach fires, defacing of property, damaged or stolen vehicles left on the beach, as well as evidence of illegal discharge of firearms. West Point WTD staff and Seattle Parks staff respond to this activity when detected, but usually by this time the damage has been done. West Point day operations crews have extinguished beach fires and cleaned up graffiti on the berm wall that is intended to visually blend West Point with its natural surroundings. King County and Seattle Parks have a duty to the people they serve to maintain a safe and secure environment in the beach and light house areas and at West Point as well. To address undesired beach and lighthouse area activity proactively, King County WTD and Seattle Parks are exploring methods to monitor vehicle traffic to those areas to ensure that existing limitations on vehicular traffic are observed and to help prevent the kinds of undesired activity that goes hand in hand with unrestricted night time vehicular access to those areas. Page 3 of 49 The project’s challenge is to prevent unpermitted vehicular access to the area without interfering with uses of the area that are encouraged for the enjoyment of this natural asset consistent with the Discovery Park Master Plan. Analysis and experience indicate that an effective means of meeting that challenge is to monitor and control motor vehicle traffic along Discovery Park Boulevard. Meeting Purpose The purpose of the open house was to: Introduce the proposed gate project Share information about the project’s purpose and need Provide opportunities for community members to ask questions of King County and Seattle Parks and Recreation Staff and provide input on the proposed project Open House Format The open house was divided into numerous stations: Problem statement. Displays described the problems that prompted King County WTD and Seattle Parks and Recreation to propose the gate, including illegal fires, trespassing after hours, illegal activities on the beach, and illegal parking that blocks access to the treatment plant. Beach access and area map. Displays described the current park rules for parking at the beach, which is allowed by City of Seattle permit only for families with children under 8, people over 62, and others with some physical condition that to walk long distances. Displays described that visitors requiring vehicle access to the beach area would still be able to acquire access and parking permits as they do now through the Discovery Park Visitor’s Center. Displays also showed the proposed location for the gate and described how pedestrians and bicycles would be able to access the beach. Project overview and gate features. Displays provided an overview of the project and provided information about the West Point Treatment Plant and its critical role in protecting water quality and public health in the greater Seattle area. Displays also outlined some of the key features of the proposed gate such as a turn‐around area in front of the gate, signs to direct park users to the Visitor’s Center to obtain parking for beach parking, and an intercom 24/7 from the gate to the treatment plant operations staff. Comment forms. Comment forms were available for community members to fill out at the meeting and leave with County staff, or to take home and mail in later. Comment forms were also available online on the project website. Input was requested by September 20, 2013. Meeting materials are available on the project website at: www.kingcounty.gov/environment/wtd/About/System/West/Plant/Projects/SecurityGate.aspx Page 4 of 49 Common Themes from Input Received Community members offered a wide range of perspectives on the proposed West Point Security Gate project at the open house as well as submitted via comment form, email and mail. Flipchart notes from the open house can be found in Appendix A and all written comments received by the project team can be found in Appendix B. Common themes from the input received include: Benefits of the proposed security gate: The proposed security gate meets the goals and mission statement of the Discovery Park Master Plan to protect the park. A security gate would reduce traffic in the park which would improve the park environment and visitor experience. A security gate would help protect the treatment plant and natural resources. A security gate would help protect public safety, reduce the number of illegal beach fires that are a threat to the park and nearby homes, and reduce damage and vandalism in the park. Concerns with the proposed security gate: A security gate would further cut off already limited access to the beach. A security gate would discourage legitimate use of the park. A security gate would not solve the issues of driftwood fires or illegal activity at the beach. A security gate would not improve security of the treatment plant. The gate and permitting system would be too complex. If the proposed security gate is installed: Maintain vehicle access to the beach during park hours, even when the Visitor’s Center is closed (specifically Mondays and evenings). Allow visitors access through the gate to drive to the beach to drop off and pick up passengers and gear. Provide year‐round shuttle bus service from all three Discovery Park parking lots to the beach. Install new signs to clearly communicate park rules and how to access the beach. Alternatives to the proposed security gate: Explore alternative ways to maximize legal activities and access and implement the least costly alternative first. Install the security gate in front of the treatment plant instead of the proposed location on Discovery Park Boulevard. Solve the illegal parking problem by adding more enforcement (ticketing and towing) rather than installing a gate. Page 5 of 49 Next Steps King County WTD and Seattle Parks and Recreation will continue to develop a project proposal based on community feedback, compliance with the Discovery Park Master Plan, and other considerations. In early December 2013, King County WTD and Seattle Parks and Recreation will host another community meeting at the Discovery Park
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places
    Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-741 UNITtDSTATtSDhPARTMENTOHTHt INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLAGES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS __________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ I NAME HISTORIC LIGHT STATION AND/OR COMMON Q LOCATION STREET & NUMBER U> f\ T 3 3* _NOTFOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT MLJKTLTEO — VICINITY OF 2nd STATE v. CODE COUNTY CODE W2\SHTJ^5TON 53 SNOHOMISH 061 CLASSIFI CATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT X-PUBLIC —iSXXUPIED _AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM jegUILDING(S) _PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS _OBJECT _IN PROCESS XXTES: RESTRICTED X.GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL XXTRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: AGENCY U.S. COAST GUARD REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: THIRTEENTH COAST GUARD DISTRICT (flp) STREET & NUMBER 915 Second Avenue CITY. TOWN STATE Seattle VICINITY OF Washington 98174 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC Snohomish County Recorder STREET & NUMBER Courthouse CITY, TOWN STATE Washington REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE NOME KNOWN DATE —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY __LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED jg<LINALTERED JOjORIGINAL SITE X-GOOD _RUINS —ALTERED —MOVED DATE_______ —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The structure consists of a tower and connected engine house, both of which are frame construction. The tower base is square, twenty feet on a side, and rises one story to a decorative parallel band. Above this band, triangular squinches effect a transition to an octagonal plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Light List Corrected Through LNM Week: 52/17
    Light List corrected through LNM week: 52/17 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) No. Name and Location Position Characteristic Height Range Structure Remarks CALIFORNIA - Eleventh District SAN DIEGO TO CAPE MENDOCINO (Chart 18020) 1 Dart Tsunami Warning Lighted 32-27-26.000N Fl (4)Y 20s Aid maintained by National Buoy Station 46412 120-33-38.000W Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. SAN DIEGO TO SANTA ROSA ISLAND (Chart 18740) 1.1 Scripps Waverider Lighted 32-31-46.800N Fl (5)Y 20s Yellow sphere with In Mexican waters. Research Buoy 191 117-25-17.400W whip antenna. Private aid. 2 Cortes Bank Lighted Bell Buoy 32-26-35.355N Fl R 4s 4 Red. 2CB 119-07-22.265W 5 Point Loma Light 32-39-54.246N Fl W 15s 88 14 Black house on Emergency light of reduced 117-14-33.552W white square intensity when main light is pyramidal skeleton extinguished. tower. HORN: 1 blast ev 30s (3s bl). 90 10 San Diego Bay Approach 32-37-20.192N Mo (A) W 5 Red and white RACON: M ( - - ) 1485 Lighted Whistle Buoy SD 117-14-45.128W stripes with red AIS MMSI: 993692029 spherical topmark. 11 Pt Loma San Diego Research 32-40-10.510N Fl Y 4s Yellow Lighted Private aid. 1483 Buoy 117-19-22.710W Buoy with Aluminum Cage. 20 Ocean Beach Pier Fog 32-45-02.178N HORN: 1 blast ev 15s. Sound Signal 117-15-33.134W Private aid. 25 MISSION BAY SOUTH JETTY 32-45-21.492N Fl R 2.5s 15 5 TR on pile.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • Final 2012 NHLPA Report Noapxb.Pub
    GSA Office of Real Property Utilization and Disposal 2012 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS REPORT NATIONAL HISTORIC LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION ACT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lighthouses have played an important role in America’s For More Information history, serving as navigational aids as well as symbols of our rich cultural past. Congress passed the National Information about specific light stations in the Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act (NHLPA) in 2000 to NHLPA program is available in the appendices and establish a lighthouse preservation program that at the following websites: recognizes the cultural, recreational, and educational National Park Service Lighthouse Heritage: value of these iconic properties, especially for local http://www.nps.gov/history/maritime/lt_index.htm coastal communities and nonprofit organizations as stewards of maritime history. National Park Service Inventory of Historic Light Stations: http://www.nps.gov/maritime/ltsum.htm Under the NHLPA, historic lighthouses and light stations (lights) are made available for transfer at no cost to Federal agencies, state and local governments, and non-profit organizations (i.e., stewardship transfers). The NHLPA Progress To Date: NHLPA program brings a significant and meaningful opportunity to local communities to preserve their Since the NHLPA program’s inception in 2000, 92 lights maritime heritage. The program also provides have been transferred to eligible entities. Sixty-five substantial cost savings to the United States Coast percent of the transferred lights (60 lights) have been Guard (USCG) since the historic structures, expensive to conveyed through stewardship transfers to interested repair and maintain, are no longer needed by the USCG government or not-for-profit organizations, while 35 to meet its mission as aids to navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bookletchart™ Puget Sound – Shilshole Bay to Commencement Bay NOAA Chart 18474
    BookletChart™ Puget Sound – Shilshole Bay to Commencement Bay NOAA Chart 18474 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the depths were 14 feet in the S entrances, and 15 feet in the N entrance. There are berths at the concrete floats for 1,400 craft to 250 feet long, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration including a guest pier and transient berths. The marina can provide National Ocean Service electricity, gasoline, bio-diesel (#1 and #2), diesel fuel, water, ice, marine Office of Coast Survey supplies, and a pump-out station at the 600-foot pier at the midpoint of the basin. Two 3-ton hoists are at the S end, and one 3-ton and one 4- www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov ton hoists are at the N end of the basin. A 55-ton marine travel lift, for 888-990-NOAA haul-out, is available at the boatyard at the S end of the basin. Dry storage is available for 82 boats on movable trailers at the N end of the What are Nautical Charts? marina. A boat launching ramp is located N of the marina in Golden Gardens Park. The marina can be contacted on VHF-FM channel 17. Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show West Point, at the N entrance to Elliott Bay, is a low, sandy point which water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much rises abruptly to an elevation of over 300 feet 0.5 mile from its tip.
    [Show full text]
  • National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act 2014 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    GSA Office of Real Property Utilization and Disposal National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act 2014 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lighthouses play an important role in America’s cultural For More Information: history, serving as aids to navigation (ATONs) for Information about specific lights in the NHLPA program is maritime vessels since before America’s founding. As a available at the following websites: way to preserve these pieces of our national heritage, Congress passed the National Historic Lighthouse National Park Service Lighthouse Heritage: Preservation Act (NHLPA) in 2000. The NHLPA http://www.nps.gov/maritime/nhlpa/intro.htm recognizes the importance of lighthouses and light General Services Administration Property Sales: stations (collectively called “lights”) to maritime traffic www.realestatesales.gov and the historical, cultural, recreational, and educational value of these iconic properties, especially for coastal communities and nonprofit organizations that serve as stewards who are dedicated to their continued Purpose of the Report: preservation. Through the NHLPA, Federal agencies, state and local governments, and not-for-profit This report outlines: organizations (non-profits) can obtain historic lights at no 1) The history of the NHLPA program; cost through stewardship transfers. If suitable public stewards are not found for a light, GSA will sell the light 2) The roles and responsibilities of the three Federal in a public auction (i.e., a public sale). Transfer deeds partner agencies executing the program; include covenants in the conveyance document to 3) Calendar Year1 2014 highlights and historical protect the light’s historic features and/or preserve disposal trends of the program; accessibility for the public.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2017 NHLPA Program Highlights Report National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act 2016-2017 NHLPA Program Highlights Report
    GSA Office of Real Property Utilization and Disposal 2016-2017 NHLPA Program Highlights Report National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act 2016-2017 NHLPA Program Highlights Report Executive Summary Congress passed the National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Purpose of the Report Act (NHLPA) in 2000 to recognize the importance of lighthouses and light stations (collectively called “lights”) for maritime traffic. This report provides Coastal communities and not-for-profit organizations (non-profits) 1. An overview of the NHLPA; also appreciate the historical, cultural, recreational, and educational value of these iconic properties. 2. The roles and responsibilities of the three Federal partner agencies executing the program; Over time and for various reasons, the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) may determine a light is excess property. Through the NHLPA, 3. Calendar Year1 2016 and 2017 highlights and historical Federal agencies; state and local governments; and non-profits disposal trends of the program; can obtain an excess historic light at no cost through stewardship 4. A discussion of reconciliation of changes from past reports; transfers. If suitable public stewards are not found for an excess light, the General Services Administration (GSA) will sell the light 5. A look back at lighthouses transferred in 2002, the first year in a public auction (i.e. a public sale). GSA transferred lights through the NHLPA program; and GSA includes covenants in the transfer documentation to protect 6. Case studies on various NHLPA activities in 2016 and 2017. and maintain the historic features of the lights. Many of these lights remain active aids-to-navigation (“ATONs”), and continue to guide maritime traffic under their new stewards, in coordination with the USCG.
    [Show full text]
  • Presented at the 2018 ISA Water / Wastewater and Automatic Controls Symposium Aug 7-9, 2018 – Bethesda, Maryland, USA – Mast 2
    Summary of the King County, Washington, West Point WWTP Flood of 2017 Brian Lee Mast, PE Copper Bell Consulting LLC 12223 Dayton Avenue North Seattle, Washington [email protected] , or [email protected] KEYWORDS Plant Failure, Float Switch, Normalization of Deviance, Electrical Failure, Redundancy ABSTRACT On February 9, 2017, the King County, Washington, West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant experienced a catastrophic failure of the entire plant due to a cascade of system failures resulting in a complete flood of the Primary Treatment process, some Solids Handling, and Boiler areas. This led to plant bypasses and discharges of raw wastewater into Puget Sound for several months while the plant was decontaminated, equipment replaced and retested, and systems restarted. Damages topped $50million. Life safety was at risk. The failures began at 2 am during a rainstorm with the plant running at full capacity, 440 MGD. An electrical failure in the Effluent Pump Station which pumps all plant effluent into Puget Sound decreased pumping capacity and began to overfill the station’s wet well. While operators were trying to restart the station, the hydraulic discharge valves for each pump also failed. From there, a safety interlock triggered the hydraulic isolation of the pump station and confined flow to the Primary Treatment Tanks. High level float switches in those tanks, meant to shut off flow into them, failed to operate which allowed the tanks to overflow for half an hour. This flooded the underground gallery system surrounding that part of the plant from base up to grade level and damaged all electrical systems and equipment in those galleries.
    [Show full text]
  • Lighthouse Bibliography
    Articles: Adelberg, Michael S. "The Sandy Hook Lighthouse During the American Revolution." The Keeper’s Log (Spring 1995), pp. 10-15. "The Aging Lighthouse: Wickies Are Giving Way to Automation As a Colorful Part of Our Maritime History Ends This Year. Preservation Will Be the Next Chapter in the Lighthouse Saga." Compressed Air: A Magazine of Applied Technology and Industrial Management 94, No. 8 (Aug 1989), pp. 4-13. Aikin, Ross. "Kilauea Point: Landfall Beacon On the Orient Run." The Keeper’s Log (Summer 1989), pp. 20-25. "Alaska Lighthouses." Lighthouse Service Bulletin II, 65 (May 1, 1923), pp. 277- 278. Alexander, B.S. "Minot's Ledge Lighthouse." Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers8 (Mar 1879), p. 83. Allen, Dorothy. Lighthouse Memories: Growing Up at the Humboldt Bay Fog Signal Station." The Keeper's Log (Summer 2003), pp. 14-19. "Ambrose Light." Commandant's Bulletin #28-82 (Dec 20 1982), pp. 16-17. "American-Made Lenses." Lighthouse Service Bulletin I, 17 (May 1913), p. 67. Amsbary, Gordon D. "St. Clair Flats Range Light Station." The Keeper’s Log X (Winter 1994), pp. 18-20. "Anacapa Island Light Station: New Primary Station on the Coast of California." Lighthouse Service Bulletin IV, 31 (Jul 1, 1932), pp. 123-125. "Ancient Lighthouses." Proceedings of the Marine Safety Council 42 (Sep 1985), p. 189. Anderson, Mazie Freeman. "Lighthouse Memories: Return to Petit Manan Light Station." The Keeper’s Log (Summer 1995), pp. 16-20. Antoniadi, E-M. "The Centenary of Augustin Fresnel." Smithsonian Report (1927), pp. 217-220. Auld, J.A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Program Highlights Report
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION ACT 20112011 PROGRAMPROGRAM HIGHLIGHTSHIGHLIGHTS REPORTREPORT NHLPA 2011 Program Highlights Report NHLPA Program Overview National NHLPA Program Accomplishments The National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act of 2000 (NHLPA), P.L. 106-355 amended the National Since enactment of NHLPA in 2000*, 84 light stations Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA). The have been conveyed to new public and private Department of Homeland Security’s United States stewards through no-cost transfers and public sales. Of Coast Guard (USCG), the Department of Interior’s the 84 light stations conveyed, 56 light stations have National Park Service (NPS), and the General Services been conveyed through no-cost transfers, and 28 light Administration (GSA) implement the NHLPA program stations were sold to private entities (Table 1). through a unique federal partnership aimed at preserving the historical and cultural significance of Table 1: Total No-Cost Transfers, and Public Sales America’s historic light stations. See Appendix A for a summary of the light stations that NHLPA gives priority to public entities and non-profit No-Cost Transfers 56 organizations to acquire a historic light station at no- Public Sales 28 cost (i.e. conveyed without monetary consideration) Total 84 through a competitive application process administered by NPS. If a potential steward cannot be have been conveyed in the NHLPA program as of identified through this process, NHLPA authorizes GSA December 2011. The aggregate number of no-cost to conduct a public sale of the light station. Figure 1 transfers and public sales peaked in 2011, when 14 below summarizes each of the three Federal agency’s light stations were transferred through the NHLPA roles and responsibilities in the NHLPA process.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Coast Guard Historian's Office
    U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office Preserving Our History For Future Generations Historic Light Station Information WASHINGTON ADMIRALTY HEAD LIGHT Location: STRAITS OF JUAN DE FUCA/PUGET SOUND; NEAR COUPEVILLE, FORT CASEY STATE PARK Station Established: 1860 Year Current Tower(s) First Lit: 1903 Operational? NO Automated? NO Deactivated: 1922 Foundation Materials: SURFACE Construction Materials: BRICK AND STUCCO Tower Shape: CONICAL Height: 120-feet Markings/Pattern: WHITE BRICK TOWER W/BLACK LANTERN Characteristics: Spanish-style structure, 2-story residence Relationship to Other Structure: ATTACHED Original Lens: FOURTH ORDER, FRESNEL 1903 Foghorn: Historical Information: The original lighthouse as completed during the months just prior to the Civil War and was among the West's earliest navigational aids. It had a fourth order Fresnel lens, and the light could be seen sixteen miles away. This light welcomed Puget Sound marine traffic to Admiralty Inlet. During the Spanish-American War, the US Army demolished the old lighthouse to build a fort (Fort Casey). The present lighthouse went into service in 1903 but was discontinued in 1927. It has been restored and now serves as a museum. It is only open during the summer for visitors. ALKI POINT LIGHT Page 1 of 12 U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office Preserving Our History For Future Generations Location: ELLIOTT BAY/PUGET SOUND Station Established: 1887 Year Current Tower(s) First Lit: 1913 Operational? YES Automated? YES 1984 Deactivated: n/a Foundation Materials: CONCRETE Construction Materials: MASONRY Tower Shape: OCTAGONAL ATTACHED TO SIGNAL BLDG Markings/Pattern: WHITE W/RED & BLACK TRIM Relationship to Other Structure: ATTACHED Original Lens: FOURTH ORDER FRESNEL 1913 BROWNS POINT LIGHT Location: COMMENCEMENT BAY E.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Coast Guard Historian's Office.]
    U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office Preserving Our History For Future Generations Lighthouses, Light Stations, Lamps, Lenses, Illuminants, Engineering & Augustin Fresnel A Historical Bibliography of Works Published Through 2007 Articles: Adelberg, Michael S. "The Sandy Hook Lighthouse During the American Revolution." The Keeper’s Log (Spring 1995), pp. 10-15. "The Aging Lighthouse: Wickies Are Giving Way to Automation As a Colorful Part of Our Maritime History Ends This Year. Preservation Will Be the Next Chapter in the Lighthouse Saga." Compressed Air: A Magazine of Applied Technology and Industrial Management 94, No. 8 (Aug 1989), pp. 4-13. Aikin, Ross. "Kilauea Point: Landfall Beacon On the Orient Run." The Keeper’s Log (Summer 1989), pp. 20-25. "Alaska Lighthouses." Lighthouse Service Bulletin II, 65 (May 1, 1923), pp. 277-278. Alexander, B.S. "Minot's Ledge Lighthouse." Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 8 (Mar 1879), p. 83. Allen, Dorothy. Lighthouse Memories: Growing Up at the Humboldt Bay Fog Signal Station." The Keeper's Log (Summer 2003), pp. 14-19. "Ambrose Light." Commandant's Bulletin #28-82 (Dec 20 1982), pp. 16-17. "American-Made Lenses." Lighthouse Service Bulletin I, 17 (May 1913), p. 67. Amsbary, Gordon D. "St. Clair Flats Range Light Station." The Keeper’s Log X (Winter 1994), pp. 18-20. Page 1 of 62 U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office Preserving Our History For Future Generations "Anacapa Island Light Station: New Primary Station on the Coast of California." Lighthouse Service Bulletin IV, 31 (Jul 1, 1932), pp. 123-125. "Ancient Lighthouses." Proceedings of the Marine Safety Council 42 (Sep 1985), p.
    [Show full text]