DOCSLIB.ORG

EIR Scoping Report LA-SD Via Inland Empire-DRAFT April-2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EIR Scoping Report LA-SD Via Inland Empire-DRAFT April-2010 Project Environmental Impact Report / Environmental Impact Statement DRAFT Scoping Report Sacramento San Francisco Stockton Transbay Terminal Millbrae-SFO Downtown Modesto Los Angeles to San Diego San Jose Redwood City Diridon Downtown Merced or Palo Alto via the Inland Empire Gilroy High-Speed Train Fresno Project EIR/EIS Visalia/Tulare/Hanford (Potential Station) April 2010 Bakersfield Palmdale Sylmar Burbank Industry Ontario Airport Los Angeles Riverside Norwalk Anaheim Murrieta Escondido University City San Diego CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT (CAHST) SCOPING REPORT LOS ANGELES TO SAN DIEGO VIA THE INLAND EMPIRE SECTION April 2010 CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT EIR/EIS DRAFT SCOPING REPORT LOS ANGELES TO SAN DIEGO SECTION Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................ S-1 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Description of Project ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Project Alternatives ................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Purpose of Public Scoping .......................................................................................... 1-5 1.4 Notification of EIR/EIS Scoping ................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Public Scoping Process ............................................................................................... 1-7 2.0 Public and Agency Involvement During Public Scoping ............................................. 2-1 2.1 Summary of Public Scoping Meetings .......................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Summary of Outreach Activities .................................................................................. 2-7 3.0 Public Scoping Summary of Issues ............................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Scoping Summary of Alternative Alignments and Stations ............................................. 3-2 3.2 Environmental Concerns ............................................................................................ 3-6 3.3 Technical/Engineering Concerns ................................................................................. 3-8 3.4 Agency Responses to NOP/NOI ................................................................................ 3-10 3.5 Summary Comment Tables ...................................................................................... 3-26 4.0 Next Steps .................................................................................................................. 4-1 LIST OF TABLES 1-1 Published Public Notifications within the LA-SD Section 1-2 Public Scoping Meeting Locations within the LA-SD HST Project Area 2-1 Summary of Outreach Activities 3-1 Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Los Angeles County 3-2 Summary of Public Scoping Comments – San Bernardino County 3-3 Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Riverside County 3-4 Summary of Public Scoping Comments – San Diego County 3-5 Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Regulatory Agency Meetings 3-6 Summary of Public Scoping Comments – Multiple Counties 3-7 Summary of Public Scoping Comments – General Comments LIST OF FIGURES 1-1 Proposed California HST System 1-2 Los Angeles to San Diego HST Project Area APPENDICES A Notice of Preparation B Notice of Intent C Public Scoping Meeting Announcements – Public Meetings and Residents within 500 feet of Proposed Alternative Alignments D Public Scoping Meeting Announcements in the Media (Display Ad and Legal Notice in Newspapers) E Media Coverage F Public Scoping Comment Card and Handouts G Public Scoping Comments – Los Angeles County H Public Scoping Comments – San Bernardino County I Public Scoping Comments – Riverside County J Public Scoping Comments – San Diego County Page i April 2010 CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT EIR/EIS DRAFT SCOPING REPORT LOS ANGELES TO SAN DIEGO SECTION K Public Scoping Comments – Regulatory Meeting L Public Scoping Comments – Multiple Counties M Public Scoping Comments – General Comments N Written Public Agency Responses to Notice of Preparation/Intent O Formal Public Scoping Meeting Attendance List P PowerPoint Presentation and Public Scoping Boards Q Corona Chamber of Commerce Form Letters Page ii April 2010 CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT EIR/EIS DRAFT SCOPING REPORT LOS ANGELES TO SAN DIEGO SECTION Summary The purpose of this report is to summarize the public scoping process and comments received during the public scoping period for the Los Angeles to San Diego (LA-SD) via the Inland Empire Section of the High-Speed Train project. The report provides a brief project background, a description of the public scoping process and meetings, a list of other outreach activities, and a summary of the public and agency comments received during scoping. In 2005, the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) and the Federal Rail Administration (FRA) completed the Statewide Program Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the proposed California High-Speed Train (HST) System as the first phase of a tiered environmental review process. The Authority certified the Statewide Program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and approved the proposed HST System. FRA issued a Record of Decision on the Statewide Program EIR/EIS as required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Statewide Program EIR/EIS established the purpose and need for the HST System and compared the proposed HST System with a No Project/No Action Alternative and a Modal Alternative. In approving the Statewide Program EIR/EIS, the Authority and the FRA selected the HST Alternative, selected certain corridors/general alignments and general station locations for further study throughout the state, and incorporated mitigation strategies with design practices. Further measures were specified to guide the development of the HST System during the site-specific project environmental review that would avoid and minimize potential adverse environmental impacts. In the Statewide Program EIR/EIS, the Authority and FRA selected the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)/I-215/I-15 corridor for the Los Angeles to San Diego (LA-SD) via the Inland Empire Section of the HST. This report summarizes the public scoping process for the LA-SD via the Inland Empire Section of the HST project. The Authority encourages broad participation during EIR/EIS public scoping and review of the draft environmental documents. Comments and suggestions are invited from all interested agencies and the public to insure the full range of issues related to the proposed action are addressed, including all reasonable alternatives. In particular, the Authority is interested in determining where there are areas of environmental sensitivity and where there could be a potential for significant impacts from the HST project. On September 17, 2009, a California State Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the LA-SD HST Project EIR/EIS was distributed to the State Clearinghouse; elected officials, local, regional, and state agencies; and the interested public. A Notice of Intent (NOI) was also published in the Federal Register on September 24, 2009 for this section. In the NOP/NOI, public agencies with legal jurisdiction were requested to advise the Authority and the FRA of the applicable permit and environmental review requirements of each agency, and the scope and content of the environmental information germane to the agency’s statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Public scoping meetings were announced and held as an important component of the public scoping process for both the state and federal environmental review. During the public scoping period, 14 public scoping meetings were held between October 13 and November 3, 2009, with a total of 812 people attending the 14 meetings. The Authority and FRA received a total of 1,243 comments from agencies, organizations, and individuals regarding the proposed LA-SD via the Inland Empire Section HST project. Major issues identified as a result of public scoping are listed below in no particular order. Location of stations Connections to local transit Location of the HST alignment Fast tracking the project Benefits of HST, including air quality, Natural resource impacts congestion relief, and economic development Noise impacts Page S-1 April 2010 CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT EIR/EIS DRAFT SCOPING REPORT LOS ANGELES TO SAN DIEGO SECTION Cost and financing of the system Ridership estimates Power source and requirements Property acquisition Economic growth issues Displacement of people Benefits/impacts on local businesses Potential devaluation of property Employment opportunities Following the public scoping process, information based on the comments received during public scoping, including alternatives proposed in public scoping comments and from the alternatives analysis (AA) will assist to determine which alternatives should be fully evaluated through the EIR/EIS process. The analysis of existing conditions and potential impacts of project alternatives will then be synthesized into the Draft EIR/EIS, and the FRA and the Authority will publish the Draft EIR/EIS. Publication is anticipated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • February 2006 Metrolink Matters
    FEB RUA RY ’0 6 Dear Metrolink Riders, January 26 is a sad day for Metrolink. January 26 is the day that an individual, for reasons we do not hope to understand, poured gasoline on his car and then parked it on the Metrolink right-of-way in Glendale triggering events that ended with two of our trains derailed. Ten of our passengers and one of our crew members died on that horrible day. Many others were hurt and still others were wounded by the loss of friends, family members and colleagues. We want to acknowledge that day by recognizing these terrible losses and expressing our gratitude to you, our passengers for your loyalty and support throughout this past year. We have worked fi ercely throughout this last year to implement a variety of changes to our rights-of-way and our equipment to ensure, to the best of our abilities, that nothing like January 26 ever happens to Metrolink passengers again. All transportation has risks, and Metrolink is already 20 times safer than riding in any automobile. However, if the opportunity exists to even incrementally increase our level of safety – we will absolutely pursue it. Forty percent of the Metrolink staff commutes every day by train. We work at Metrolink. We ride Metrolink. And even on days like January 26 when our hearts are completely broken, we believe in what we do. Thank you for being a part of the Metrolink family. David Solow Art Brown Metrolink CEO Metrolink Board Chairman ((800)8 0 0 ) 3371-LINK7 1 - www.metrolinktrains.com Metrolink Matters February ’06 Inside Metrolink Metrolink considers the safety of our passengers our number-one priority, n Environment—Metrolink is studying an innovative approach involving and we’re proud to provide our almost 42,000 weekly riders with a secure and sealed corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Agenda Item No. 34
    Supplemental Agenda Item No. 34 Board of Directors Meeting January 9, 2019 10:30 a.m. Location: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority First Floor Lobby Board Room Santa Fe Depot, 1170 W. 3rd Street San Bernardino CA. 92410 DISCUSSION CALENDAR Transit 34. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B Project Update That the Board, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority: A. Receive and file an update on the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B Project. B. Provide direction to staff on the need to work with the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority to develop Diesel Multiple Unit Service to meet the transit and transit-oriented development needs in Montclair in case the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B terminates west of the San Bernardino County/Los Angeles County line. This agenda item was made available after the posting of the agenda. Minute Action SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEM: 34 Date: January 9, 2019 Subject: Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B Project Update Recommendation: That the Board, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority: A. Receive and file an update on the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B Project. B. Provide direction to staff on the need to work with the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority to develop Diesel Multiple Unit Service to meet the transit and transit-oriented development needs in Montclair in case the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B terminates west of the San Bernardino County/Los Angeles County line.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Schools
    School Name Address City Zip Phone 1st Academy of Beauty 8823 Garvey Ave., Units B-1 & B1/2 Rosemead 91770 (626) 288-0000 ABC Adult School 20122 Cabrillo Lane Cerritos 90703 (562) 926-6734 Abram Friedman Occupational Center, Los Angeles Unified School District 1646 S. Olive Street Los Angeles 90015 (213) 765-2400 Academy for Salon Professionals 19520 Nordhoff Street, Suite 9 Northridge 91324 (818) 701-5799 Academy of Beauty 3834 Main Street Culver City 90232 (310) 837-0411 Academy of Esthetics & Cosmetology 1116 San Fernando Road San Fernando 91340 (818) 361-5501 Adrians Beauty College of Tracy 3000 W. Grantline Road Tracy 95304 (209) 835-3550 Adrian’s Beauty College of Turlock, Inc. 1340 West Main Street Turlock 95380 (209) 632-2233 Advance Beauty College 10121 Westminster Avenue Garden Grove 92843 (714) 530-2131 Advance Beauty College 25322 McIntyre Street Laguna Hills 92653 (949) 951-8883 Advance Beauty Techs Academy 2191 Sampson Ave., Suite 105 Corona 92879 (951) 817-2560 Alhambra Beauty College 200 W. Main Street Alhambra 91801 (626) 282-7765 American Beauty Academy 558 Main Street Brawley 92227 (760) 344-0445 American Beauty Academy 8428 Van Nuys Blvd. Panorama City 91402 (818) 934-6281 American Beauty College 641 West Palmdale Blvd. Palmdale 93551 (661) 264-5005 American Beauty College 646 South Sunset Avenue West Covina 91790 (626) 472-7402 American Beauty Institute LLC 4625 Convoy Street, Suites A & B San Diego 92111 (858) 560-1088 American Empire College 1168 San Gabriel Blvd., Suites K, L, Q, & R Rosemead 91770 (626) 872-0136 American Institute of Education 17632 Irvine Blvd., Suite 215 Tustin 92780 (714) 564-0417 Amy Beauty School 290 Corporate Terrace Circle, Suite 104 Corona 92879 (951) 272-3888 Asel Beauty College 9240 Garden Grove Blvd., Suite 10 Garden Grove 92844 (714) 537-6100 Asian-American International Beauty College 7871 Westminster Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Cost Estimate Memo Technical Note Project: Hybrid Rail Study
    Appendix F: Capital Cost Estimate Memo Technical Note Project: Hybrid Rail Study Prepared by: Amjad Hussain Date: 4/30/18 Approved by: Eric Banghart Checked by: Darlene Gonzalez Subject: Capital Cost Estimate Memo 1 Background and Purpose The Double tracking cost estimate is a based on the preliminary 5% level of design. The following describes the methodology used to develop this cost estimate. This report describes the development of capital cost estimates for infrastructure increase to accompany the Hybrid DMU vehicles. Rough order-of-magnitude capital cost estimates were developed for the following scenarios: ● Supplementing Existing Service between Pomona North and University of Redlands ● Limited bi-directional blended scenarios between El Monte and University of Redlands – 30-Minute service – 15-Minute service ● Limited bi-directional blended scenarios between Pomona North and University of Redlands – 30-Minute service – 15-Minute service ● Unconstrained scenarios between terminus station (El Monte, Pomona North, or Montclair) and University of Redlands – 30-minute service – 20-minute service – 15-minute service ● Ontario Airport Total (Escalated to 2018) Prepare from previous capital cost estimates Each scenario includes an estimate of the probable cost of construction with appropriate increase in vehicles and new/modifications to the existing platforms. The cost estimate addresses double tracking route alignment, existing track shifts, infrastructure improvements and other system costs. The cost estimates will include appropriate design allowances, allocated and unallocated contingency mark-ups as individual line items. A Basis of Estimate Report explaining the scope, assumptions and limitations of the estimating process will accompany the cost estimate. 2 Estimate Definition In order to estimate project capital cost quantities, further conceptual engineering design development double tracking improvements and station modifications where necessary as part of the 15, 20 and 30- minute route planning scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Shop California Insider Tips 2020
    SHOP CALIFORNIA INSIDER TIPS 2020 ENJOY THE ULTIMATE SHOPPING AND DINING EXPERIENCES! Exciting Shopping and Dining Tour Packages at ShopAmericaTours.com/shop-California Purchase with code ShopCA for 10% discount. Rodeo Drive 2 THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA From revitalizing beauty services, to wine, spirits and chocolate tastings, DFS offers unexpected, BLOOMINGDALE’S complimentary and convenient benefits to its See all the stylish sights – starting with a visit to shoppers. Join the DFS worldwide membership Bloomingdale’s. Since 1872, Bloomingdale’s has program, LOYAL T, to begin enjoying members- been at the center of style, carrying the most only benefits while you travel.DFS.com coveted designer fashions, shoes, handbags, cosmetics, fine jewelry and gifts in the world. MACERICH SHOPPING DESTINATIONS When you visit our stores, you’ll enjoy exclusive Explore the U.S.’ best shopping, dining, and personal touches – like multilingual associates entertainment experiences at Macerich’s shopping and special visitor services – that ensure you feel destinations. With centers located in the heart welcome, pampered and at home. These are just of California’s gateway destinations, immerse a few of the things that make Bloomingdale’s like yourself in the latest fashion trends, hottest no other store in the world. Tourism services cuisine, and an unrivaled, engaging environment. include unique group events and programs, Macerich locations provide a variety of benefits special visitor offers and more, available at our to visitors, including customized shopping, 11 stores in California including San Francisco experiential packages, visitor perks and more. Centre, South Coast Plaza, Century City, Beverly To learn more about Macerich and the exclusive Center, Santa Monica Place, Fashion Valley and visitor experiences, visit macerichtourism.com.
    [Show full text]
  • WARN Report Summary by Received Date 07/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 State Fiscal Year No
    WARN Report Summary by Received Date 07/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 State Fiscal Year No. Of Notice Date Effective Date Received Date Company City County Employees Layoff/Closure 06/10/2020 06/09/2020 06/30/2020 Harbor Bay Club, Inc Alameda Alameda County 80 Layoff Temporary 03/20/2020 03/20/2020 06/30/2020 MD2 Industries, LLC Long Beach Los Angeles County 109 Closure Temporary 06/30/2020 08/21/2020 06/30/2020 NBCUniversal Media, LLC - Digital Lab Unit Universal City Los Angeles County 28 Layoff Temporary 04/22/2020 06/22/2020 06/30/2020 House of Blues Anaheim Anaheim Orange County 8 Closure Temporary 06/29/2020 08/01/2020 06/30/2020 ADESA California, LLC dba ADESA/AFC Los Mira Loma Riverside County 71 Layoff Permanent Angeles 06/17/2020 06/17/2020 06/30/2020 K&N Engineering, Inc. Riverside Riverside County 44 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 07/28/2020 06/30/2020 Benchmark Arrowhead, LLC dba Lake Lake Arrowhead San Bernardino County 114 Layoff Permanent Arrowhead Resort and Spa 06/18/2020 07/06/2020 06/30/2020 HOWMET Aerospace Fontana San Bernardino County 75 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 Bahia Resort Hotel San Diego San Diego County 47 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa San Diego San Diego County 46 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 The Lodge Torrey Pines La Jolla San Diego County 84 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 Bahia Resort Hotel San Diego San Diego County 33 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa San Diego San Diego County 33 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 The Lodge Torrey Pines La Jolla San Diego County 37 Layoff Temporary 06/08/2020 03/30/2020 06/30/2020 SmartCareMD Escondido San Diego County 38 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 08/31/2020 06/30/2020 Stryker Employment Company Menlo Park San Mateo County 33 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 08/29/2020 06/30/2020 Nitto, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Interceptor System Master Plan B 2000 GEOTECHNICAL AND
    Technical Memorandum 3 / Interceptor System Master Plan - 2000 June, 2000 Prepared for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Interceptor System Master Plan B 2000 GEOTECHNICAL AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS Technical Memorandum 3 España Geotechnical Consulting Technical Memorandum 3 / Interceptor System Master Plan - 2000 June, 2000 Project No. J146 Technical Memorandum 3 / Interceptor System Master Plan - 2000 June, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Geotechnical Data ............................................................................................................... 1 2.1 General .................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Regional Geology.................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Regional Groundwater Conditions.......................................................................... 2 3.0 Geotechnical Conditions of Potential Significant Impact ................................................... 3 3.1 Slope Instability and Liquefaction........................................................................... 3 3.2 Very Dense Cobbles and Boulders within the American River Channel...............
    [Show full text]
  • Covina General Plan Circulation Element
    COVINA GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT CIRCULATION ELEMENT COVINA GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT PREPARED BY COVINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION STAFF APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION - March 14, 2000 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL - April 18, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF TABLES B-III LIST OF PICTURES B-V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B-VII I. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND B-1 II. OVERVIEW OF KEY EXISTING CIRCULATION/ TRANSPORTATION ISSUES B-3 A. General B-3 B. Key Existing Circulation/ Transportation Issues B-3 III. INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS B-5 A. Major Thoroughfares and Transportation Routes B-5 1. Streets and Highways B-5 a. General information, street types, and street characteristics and amenities B-5 b. Existing traffic volumes and traffic flow quality or level of service (LOS) B-6 c. Future traffic volumes and traffic flow quality or level of service (LOS) B-7 d. Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) B-10 e. Potential street deficiency mitigation measures B-11 2. Truck Routes B-13 3. Bus Routes B-14 4. Commuter Rail/Railroad Line B-15 5. Bicycle Routes and Lanes B-15 6. Pedestrian Routes B-16 B. Transportation Terminals B-17 1. Truck B-17 2. Bus B-17 3. Commuter Rail/Railroad B-17 C. City Transportation Programs B-18 D. Parking Facilities B-19 E. Transportation Demand Management B-20 B-I F. Transportation System Management B-21 G. Sewer and Storm Drainage Systems B-21 1. Sewer System B-21 2. Storm Drainage System B-21 H. Local Public Utilities and Facilities B-22 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Agenda 3 CC 1. City Council to Approve Minutes Of
    Table of Contents Agenda 3 CC 1. City Council to approve minutes of the September 15, 2015 Regular meeting of the City Council/Successor Agency to the Covina Redevelopment Agency/Public Finance Authority/Housing Authority. Minutes of September 15, 2015 9 CC 2. City Council to approve the payment of demands in the amount of $3,288,615.54. Payment of Demands 19 CC 3. Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency to approve payment of demands in the amount of $13,513.11. Payment of Demands 29 CC 4. City Council to approve Change Orders for Pedestrian and Metrolink Station Improvements. Resolution No. 15-7397 33 CC 5. City Council to consider agreement with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for MTA Transit- Oriented Development Planning Grant. LACMTA Agreement 55 CC 6. City Council to approve Change Orders for Glendora Avenue and Cienega Street Traffic Signal Installation. Resolution No. 15-7402 103 CC 7. City Council to approve Final Acceptance and filing of Notice of Completion for Resurfacing of Streets at Hollenbeck Avenue, Cypress Street, et al. Resolution No. 15-7403 113 CC 8. City Council to authorize Second Amendment to Absolute Security International Agreement for security services at Covina Metrolink Station and Parking Complex. Resolution No. 15-7404 123 CC 9. City Council to confirm the continued existence of an emergency condition for Roycove Reservoir and Pump Station. Resolution No. 15-7405 157 CC 10. City Council to amend Fiscal Year 2015-16 Parks and Recreation Department, Library Services Division Budget by $19,500 for the purchase of books and periodicals utilizing the Joseph J.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Conditions and Trends Report 11-01-2006
    City of Hesperia General Plan Update Economic Conditions and Trends Prepared for: City of Hesperia 15776 Main Street Hesperia, CA 92345 November 1, 2006 SRHA JOB #1134 11661 San Vicente Blvd. Suite 306 Los Angeles, CA 90049 310.820.2680, 310.820.8341 fax www.stanleyrhoffman.com CONTENTS TABLES .......................................................................................................................................................III FIGURES.......................................................................................................................................................V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................VI CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................10 1.1 Background and Purpose of Report .................................................................................. 10 1.2 Regional Setting................................................................................................................ 10 1.3 Definition of Market Area ................................................................................................ 13 1.4 Sources of Information ..................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Organization of Report ..................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 2
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices to the Q1 2021 Report to the California Air Resources Board
    Appendices to the Q1 2021 Report to California Air Resources Board Public Version May 20, 2021 1 Appendices to the Q1 2021 Report to California Air Resources Board Table of Contents Appendix 1: Investments in Low-Income and Disadvantaged Communities ............................................... 3 a. Green City ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Census Tracts in GIG HomeZone .......................................................................................................... 3 2. Census Tracts in Franklin Boulevard Shuttle Service ........................................................................... 4 3. AAA Car Subscription Service Census Tracts ....................................................................................... 6 b. ZEV Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................ 12 1. Public Charging Locations .................................................................................................................. 12 2. Public DCFC Station Site Development Progress ............................................................................... 22 c. Education and Awareness..................................................................................................................... 23 1. Sponsored Education and Awareness Events in Low-Income and Disadvantaged Communities ..... 23 Appendix 2:
    [Show full text]