Arxiv:1902.08184V3 [Math.AG] 19 Mar 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
STABILITY CONDITIONS IN FAMILIES AREND BAYER, MARTI´ LAHOZ, EMANUELE MACRI,` HOWARD NUER, ALEXANDER PERRY, PAOLO STELLARI ABSTRACT. We develop a theory of Bridgeland stability conditions and moduli spaces of semistable objects for a family of varieties. Our approach is based on and generalizes previ- ous work by Abramovich–Polishchuk, Kuznetsov, Lieblich, and Piyaratne–Toda. Our notion includes openness of stability, semistable reduction, a support property uniformly across the family, and boundedness of semistable objects. We show that such a structure exists whenever stability conditions are known to exist on the fibers. Our main application is the generalization of Mukai’s theory for moduli spaces of semi- stable sheaves on K3 surfaces to moduli spaces of Bridgeland semistable objects in the Kuz- netsov component associated to a cubic fourfold. This leads to the extension of theorems by Addington–Thomas and Huybrechts on the derived category of special cubic fourfolds, to a new proof of the integral Hodge conjecture, and to the construction of an infinite series of unirational locally complete families of polarized hyperk¨ahler manifolds of K3 type. Other applications include the deformation-invariance of Donaldson–Thomas invariants counting Bridgeland stable objects on Calabi–Yau threefolds, and a method for constructing stability conditions on threefolds via degeneration. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Setup, notation, and some terminology 8 Part I. Semiorthogonal decompositions and t-structures in families 11 3. Semiorthogonal decompositions and base change 11 4. Local t-structures 21 5. Base change of local t-structures 26 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14A22, 14D20, 14F05, 14J28, 14M20, 14N35, 18E30. Key words and phrases. Bridgeland stability conditions, base change for semiorthogonal decompositions, base change for t-structures, relative moduli spaces, non-commutative varieties, K3 surfaces, cubic fourfolds. arXiv:1902.08184v3 [math.AG] 19 Mar 2021 A. B. was supported by the ERC Starting Grant ERC-2013-StG-337039-WallXBirGeom, by the ERC Con- solidator Grant ERC-2018-CoG-819864-WallCrossAG, and by the NSF Grant DMS-1440140 while the author was in residence at the MSRI in Berkeley, during the Spring 2019. M. L. was supported by a Ram´on y Cajal fellowship and partially by the Spanish MINECO research project PID2019-104047GB-I00. E. M. was partially supported by the NSF grant DMS-1700751, by a Poincar´eChair from the Institut Henri Poincar´eand the Clay Mathematics Institute, by the Institut des Hautes Etudes´ Scientifiques (IHES),´ by a Poste Rouge CNRS at Uni- versit´eParis-Sud, by the ERC Synergy Grant ERC-2020-SyG-854361-HyperK, and by the National Group for Algebraic and Geometric Structures, and their Applications (GNSAGA-INdAM). H. N. was partially supported by the NSF postdoctoral fellowship DMS-1606283, by the NSF RTG grant DMS-1246844, and by the NSF FRG grant DMS-1664215. A. P. was partially supported by the NSF postdoctoral fellowship DMS-1606460 and the NSF grant DMS-2002709. P. S. was partially supported by the ERC Consolidator Grant ERC-2017-CoG-771507- StabCondEn, by the research project PRIN 2017 “Moduli and Lie Theory”, and by research project FARE 2018 HighCaSt (grant number R18YA3ESPJ). 1 2 A. BAYER, M. LAHOZ, E. MACRI,` H. NUER, A. PERRY, P. STELLARI 6. Flat, torsion, and torsion free objects 34 7. Inducing local t-structures on semiorthogonal components 39 Part II. Moduli spaces 43 8. Moduli of complexes 43 9. Moduli of objects in a subcategory 45 10. Fiberwise t-structures 48 11. Quot spaces 51 Part III. Harder–Narasimhan structures over a curve 59 12. Stability conditions and base change 59 13. Harder–Narasimhan structures over a curve 67 14. Weak stability conditions, tilting, and base change 71 15. Weak Harder–Narasimhan structures over a curve 75 16. Semistable reduction 80 17. Torsion theories and Harder–Narasimhan structures 84 18. Harder–Narasimhan structures via stability conditions on fibers 87 19. Tilting weak Harder–Narasimhan structures over a curve 90 Part IV. Stability conditions over a higher-dimensional base 93 20. Flat families of fiberwise (weak) stability conditions 93 21. Stability conditions over S 99 22. Deforming stability conditions over S 106 23. Inducing stability conditions over S 108 Part V. Construction 111 24. Main construction statements 111 25. Tilting slope-stability in families 112 26. Tilting tilt-stability in families of threefolds 115 27. Stability conditions from degeneration 117 28. Donaldson–Thomas invariants 117 Part VI. Moduli spaces for Kuznetsov components of cubic fourfolds 118 29. Main applications to cubic fourfolds 118 30. Stability conditions on families of Kuznetsov components 121 31. Generalized Mukai’s theorem 126 32. Specializing Kuznetsov components to twisted K3 surfaces 129 33. Proofs of the main results 132 References 137 Index of Notations 143 1. INTRODUCTION Stability conditions on triangulated categories were introduced by Bridgeland in [Bri07] and further studied by Kontsevich and Soibelman in [KS08]; originally based on work by STABILITY CONDITIONS IN FAMILIES 3 Douglas [Dou02] in string theory, they have found many applications to algebraic geometry via wall-crossing. In this paper we develop the corresponding theory for derived categories in a family of varieties over a base. Our definition is guided by the requirement that it should come with a notion of relative moduli spaces, but also be flexible enough to allow deformations. Stability conditions over a base. Let X → S be a flat family of projective varieties over some base scheme S. Consider a collection of stability conditions σs on the derived categories b D (Xs) of the fibers. When does this form a well-behaved family σ of stability conditions? Our proposed answer is the main content of this article. It can be paraphrased as follows; see Definitions 20.5 and 21.15 for the precise formulation. Definition 1.1. A collection of numerical stability conditions σ = (σs = (Zs, Ps))s∈S on the fibers is a stability condition on Db(X) over S if it satisfies the following conditions: (1) The central charge is locally constant in families of objects. (2) Geometric stability is open in families of objects. (3) After base change C → S to any Dedekind scheme C, the stability conditions σc on the b fibers over C are induced by a HN structure on D (XC ). (4) Each stability condition σs satisfies the support property, an inequality on classes of semi- stable objects, in a form that is uniform across all fibers. (5) The set of semistable objects in the fibers of X → S satisfies a boundedness condition. Our precise setup is quite general, see Main Setup; for instance S could be defined over a non-algebraically closed field, or it could be a scheme of mixed characteristic. In the definition, we consider all points of S, closed or non-closed. We work with numerical stability conditions, as they allow base change under field extensions, see Theorem 12.17. This gives a stability condition σt on Xt for any point t over S. For a base change T → S, the notion of a family of objects over T appearing in (1) and (2) b is formalized by Lieblich’s notion of a relatively perfect object E ∈ D (XT ) [Lie06a]; the b fibers Et of such an object lie in D (Xt). Condition (2) is the glue tying together the stability conditions on different fibers; for ex- ample, we will see in Proposition 20.11 that in the case where X is a product X0 × S, it forces the collection of stability conditions on X0 parametrized by s ∈ S to be constant. The concept of a Harder–Narasimhan (HN) structure in (3) will be introduced in Section 13 of this paper (see Definition 13.3 for a precise definition) and studied for the remainder of Part III. The condition (3) requires that the hearts Ac of the stability conditions σc “integrate” to a global heart AC; in the product case, such an AC has been constructed by Abramovich– b Polishchuk [AP06, Pol07]. Moreover, every object in D (XC ) is required to have a global HN filtration; this combines the classical notion of generic HN filtrations with the existence of semistable reductions, and will thus imply the valuative criterion of properness for relative moduli spaces. Let us elaborate on conditions (4) and (5). We fix a finite rank free abelian group Λ, and a b morphism vs : Knum(D (Xs)) → Λ for every s ∈ S, such that vt(Et) is locally constant in families. Then σ is a stability condition with respect to Λ if each Zs factors as Z ◦ vs for some fixed Z ∈ Hom(Λ, C). In (4), we require that there is a quadratic form Q on ΛR such that 4 A. BAYER, M. LAHOZ, E. MACRI,` H. NUER, A. PERRY, P. STELLARI (1) the kernel (ker Z) ⊂ Λ is negative definite with respect to Q, and (2) for every s ∈ S and for every σs-semistable object E ∈ Ds, we have Q(vs(E)) > 0. Our boundedness condition (5) says that given v ∈ Λ, there is a finite type family parametriz- b ing the union for all s ∈ S of objects E ∈ D (Xs) that are σs-semistable with vs(E)= v. Our first main result is a version of Bridgeland’s Deformation Theorem. b b Theorem 1.2 (Theorem 22.2). The space StabΛ(D (X)/S) of stability conditions on D (X) over S with respect to Λ is a complex manifold, and the forgetful map Z : Stab(Db(X)/S) → Hom(Λ, C), is a local isomorphism. In the absolute case where S is a point, the support property (4) is enough to prove Bridge- land’s Deformation Theorem for stability conditions [Bri07]. In our setting, the main step is to show that openness of geometric stability is preserved under small deformations of the central charge Z; this both requires boundedness of semistable objects (5) (to obtain boundedness of destabilizing quotients, and thereby constructibility of the unstable locus) and the existence of HN structures over DVRs (3) (to show that the unstable locus is closed under specialization).