DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Impacts of a Trait-Mediated Cascade by Hsun-Yi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Impacts of a Trait-Mediated Cascade by Hsun-Yi Ecological Impacts of a Trait-mediated Cascade By Hsun-Yi Hsieh A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Natural Resources and Environment) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Ivette Perfecto, Chair Professor Bradley Cardinale Professor Mark D Hunter Professor John H. Vandermeer ! ! ! © Hsun-Yi Hsieh All rights reserved 2015 ! ! DEDICATED TO LIFE ! ii! Table of Contents Dedication ……………………………………………………………………………………......ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. viii List of Appendices……………………………………………………………………………… ix Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 References ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 Trait-Mediated Indirect Effects of Phorid Flies on Ants ...................................... 10 2.1. Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 10 2.2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3. Direct Density Effects of Phorid Parasitization on Ants .................................................. 11 2.4. Trait-mediated Effects on Ant Foraging Activity, Resource Acquisition, and Defense 12 2.4.1. Number of Foragers .......................................................................................................... 12 2.4.2. Size of Foragers ................................................................................................................. 13 2.4.3. Acquisition of Food Resources ......................................................................................... 13 2.4.4. Compensatory Factors ...................................................................................................... 14 2.5. Phorid Parasitoids and Competition within Ant Assemblages ........................................ 15 2.5.1. Exploitative and Interference Competition .................................................................... 15 2.5.2. Factors That Interact with Phorid Parasitoids to Affect Competition ........................ 17 2.5.3. Competitive Dominance Hierarchies and Species Coexistence .................................... 19 2.6. Trait-mediated Cascades: The Case of Azteca sericeasur in the Coffee Agroecosystem 20 2.7. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 24 References .................................................................................................................................... 26 Chapter 3 Cascading trait-mediated interactions induced by ant pheromones ................... 37 3.1. Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 37 ! iii! 3.2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 37 3.2.1.The study system: the first TMII unit .............................................................................. 39 3.2.2. The study system: the second TMII unit ........................................................................ 40 3.3. Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................ 41 3.3.1. Olfactometer bioassays ..................................................................................................... 42 3.3.2. Oviposition experiment .................................................................................................... 43 3.4. Data analyses ........................................................................................................................ 44 3.5. Results ................................................................................................................................... 44 3.6. Discussions ............................................................................................................................ 45 3.6 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................. 49 3.7. Authors’ Contributions ....................................................................................................... 49 References .................................................................................................................................... 50 Chapter 4 Effects of trait–mediated indirect interactions on a consumer-resources system ....................................................................................................................................................... 59 4.1. Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 59 4.2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 60 4.3. Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................ 63 4.3.1. Study site ............................................................................................................................ 63 4.3.2. Behavioral experiments .................................................................................................... 63 4.3.3. Azya orbigera parasitism experiments ........................................................................... 64 4.3.4. Source of insects used for the experiments ..................................................................... 65 4.3.5. Field surveys ...................................................................................................................... 65 4.4. Data Analyses ....................................................................................................................... 66 4.4.1. Ant behavior ...................................................................................................................... 66 4.4.2. Beetle parasitism experiments- effect of TMIIs on parasitism of A. orbigera ............ 66 4.4.3. Beetle parasitism experiments - effect of TMIIs on survivors’ sex ratio ..................... 67 4.4.4. Beetle parasitism experiments – per capita survival probability with regard to sex . 68 4.4.5. Field surveys ...................................................................................................................... 69 4.5. Results ................................................................................................................................... 69 4.5.1. Ants are aggressive towards parasitoid wasps and the presence of phorid flies reduce that aggressiveness ...................................................................................................................... 69 4.5.2. One TMII does not affect beetle parasitism but two interacting TMIIs do ................ 69 ! iv! 4.5.3. One TMII does not affect survivor’s sex ratio but two interacting TMIIs do ............ 70 4.5.4. TMIIs affect fitness of male vs. female individuals ........................................................ 70 4.5.5. Field surveys: female biased population in areas with high phorid attack intensity . 71 4.6. Discussions ............................................................................................................................ 71 References .................................................................................................................................... 77 Chapter 5 Community-wide impacts of interactive trait-mediated interactions: A case study in neotropic coffee agroecosystems ................................................................................. 89 5.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 89 5.2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 89 5.3 Methods .................................................................................................................................. 91 5.3.1. Study sites and field experiments .................................................................................... 91 5.4. Data analyses ........................................................................................................................ 92 5.5. Results ................................................................................................................................... 93 5.5.1. Responses of total arthropods and particular orders .................................................... 93 5.5.2. Responses of Morphospecies ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rediscovery and Reclassification of the Dipteran Taxon Nothomicrodon
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Rediscovery and reclassification of the dipteran taxon Nothomicrodon Wheeler, an exclusive Received: 07 November 2016 Accepted: 28 February 2017 endoparasitoid of gyne ant larvae Published: 31 March 2017 Gabriela Pérez-Lachaud1, Benoit J. B. Jahyny2,3, Gunilla Ståhls4, Graham Rotheray5, Jacques H. C. Delabie6 & Jean-Paul Lachaud1,7 The myrmecophile larva of the dipteran taxon Nothomicrodon Wheeler is rediscovered, almost a century after its original description and unique report. The systematic position of this dipteran has remained enigmatic due to the absence of reared imagos to confirm indentity. We also failed to rear imagos, but we scrutinized entire nests of the Brazilian arboreal dolichoderine ant Azteca chartifex which, combined with morphological and molecular studies, enabled us to establish beyond doubt that Nothomicrodon belongs to the Phoridae (Insecta: Diptera), not the Syrphidae where it was first placed, and that the species we studied is an endoparasitoid of the larvae of A. chartifex, exclusively attacking sexual female (gyne) larvae. Northomicrodon parasitism can exert high fitness costs to a host colony. Our discovery adds one more case to the growing number of phorid taxa known to parasitize ant larvae and suggests that many others remain to be discovered. Our findings and literature review confirm that the Phoridae is the only taxon known that parasitizes both adults and the immature stages of different castes of ants, thus threatening ants on all fronts. Ants are hosts to at least 17 orders of myrmecophilous arthropods (organisms dependent on ants), ranging from general scavengers to highly selective predators and parasitoids that attack either ants, their brood or other myr- mecophiles1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • Ladybirds, Ladybird Beetles, Lady Beetles, Ladybugs of Florida, Coleoptera: Coccinellidae1
    Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. EENY-170 Ladybirds, Ladybird beetles, Lady Beetles, Ladybugs of Florida, Coleoptera: Coccinellidae1 J. H. Frank R. F. Mizell, III2 Introduction Ladybird is a name that has been used in England for more than 600 years for the European beetle Coccinella septempunctata. As knowledge about insects increased, the name became extended to all its relatives, members of the beetle family Coccinellidae. Of course these insects are not birds, but butterflies are not flies, nor are dragonflies, stoneflies, mayflies, and fireflies, which all are true common names in folklore, not invented names. The lady for whom they were named was "the Virgin Mary," and common names in other European languages have the same association (the German name Marienkafer translates Figure 1. Adult Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus, the to "Marybeetle" or ladybeetle). Prose and poetry sevenspotted lady beetle. Credits: James Castner, University of Florida mention ladybird, perhaps the most familiar in English being the children's rhyme: Now, the word ladybird applies to a whole Ladybird, ladybird, fly away home, family of beetles, Coccinellidae or ladybirds, not just Your house is on fire, your children all gone... Coccinella septempunctata. We can but hope that newspaper writers will desist from generalizing them In the USA, the name ladybird was popularly all as "the ladybird" and thus deluding the public into americanized to ladybug, although these insects are believing that there is only one species. There are beetles (Coleoptera), not bugs (Hemiptera). many species of ladybirds, just as there are of birds, and the word "variety" (frequently use by newspaper 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of the Laboulbeniomycetes: Diversity, Evolution, and Patterns of Speciation
    Studies of the Laboulbeniomycetes: Diversity, Evolution, and Patterns of Speciation The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:40049989 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA ! STUDIES OF THE LABOULBENIOMYCETES: DIVERSITY, EVOLUTION, AND PATTERNS OF SPECIATION A dissertation presented by DANNY HAELEWATERS to THE DEPARTMENT OF ORGANISMIC AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Biology HARVARD UNIVERSITY Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2018 ! ! © 2018 – Danny Haelewaters All rights reserved. ! ! Dissertation Advisor: Professor Donald H. Pfister Danny Haelewaters STUDIES OF THE LABOULBENIOMYCETES: DIVERSITY, EVOLUTION, AND PATTERNS OF SPECIATION ABSTRACT CHAPTER 1: Laboulbeniales is one of the most morphologically and ecologically distinct orders of Ascomycota. These microscopic fungi are characterized by an ectoparasitic lifestyle on arthropods, determinate growth, lack of asexual state, high species richness and intractability to culture. DNA extraction and PCR amplification have proven difficult for multiple reasons. DNA isolation techniques and commercially available kits are tested enabling efficient and rapid genetic analysis of Laboulbeniales fungi. Success rates for the different techniques on different taxa are presented and discussed in the light of difficulties with micromanipulation, preservation techniques and negative results. CHAPTER 2: The class Laboulbeniomycetes comprises biotrophic parasites associated with arthropods and fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociobiology 63(4): 1015-1021 (December, 2016) DOI: 10.13102/Sociobiology.V63i4.1077
    Sociobiology 63(4): 1015-1021 (December, 2016) DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v63i4.1077 Sociobiology An international journal on social insects Research article - Ants Phorid Flies Parasitizing Leaf-Cutting Ants: Their Occurrence, Parasitism Rates, Biology and the First Account of Multiparasitism MAL Bragança1, FV Arruda2, LRR Souza1, HC Martins1, TMC Della Lucia3 1 - Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Porto Nacional-TO, Brazil 2 - Universidade Estadual de Goiás, Anápolis-GO, Brazil 3 - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa-MG, Brazil Article History Abstract The leaf-cutting ants Atta sexdens (Linnaeus) and Atta laevigata (Smith) Edited by were parasitized by the following phorid flies: Apocephalus attophilus Gilberto M. M. Santos, UEFS, Brazil Received 25 May 2016 Borgmeier, Apocephalus vicosae Disney, Myrmosicarius grandicornis Initial acceptance 24 August 2016 Borgmeier and species of Eibesfeldtphora Disney. The area of occurrence Final acceptance 07 October 2016 of phorids parasitizing A. sexdens was extended to include Central Publication date 13 January 2017 Brazil. The rate of parasitism on A. sexdens was three times lower than the rate found on A. laevigata; the most common flies were, Keywords respectively, M. grandicornis in A. sexdens and A. attophilus in A. Savannah, host-parasite association, natural enemies, Phoridae, Atta sexdens, laevigata. This last phorid showed the shortest life span but the higher Atta laevigata. percentage of emergence. Multiparasitism on workers of A. sexdens and of A. laevigata involving three combinations of four phorid species Corresponding author was rare and is here related for the first time for leaf-cutting ants. Marcos Antonio Lima Bragança Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Curso de Ciências Biológicas, 77500-000, Porto Nacional-TO, Brasil E-Mail: [email protected] Introduction Disney.
    [Show full text]
  • (Diptera: Phoridae) Associated with Leaf-Cutter Ants and Army Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Argentina by R
    95 New Species and Records of Scuttle Flies (Diptera: Phoridae) Associated with Leaf-cutter Ants and Army Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Argentina by R. Henry L. Disney1, Luciana Elizalde2 & Patricia J. Folgarait2 ABSTRACT Lucianaphora folgaraitae Disney n. gen., n. sp., Macrocerides attophilus n. sp. are described, both being collected over leaf-cutter ants and Cremersia crassicostalis n. sp. from females collected over army ants. Some species col- lected with army ants are given code letters until they are linked up with their unknown sex. Host records for previously known species were all from colonies of army ants, whose myrmecophiles are better documented than those recorded from the colonies of leaf-cutter ants. Key Words: Phoridae, Argentina, Leaf-cutter ants, Army ants INTRODUCTION The numerous myrmecophile and parasitoidscuttle flies (Phoridae) associ- ated with army ants (Ecitoninae) have been reviewed by Disney & Kistner (2003), recently augmented by Disney & Rettenmeyer (2007) and Disney & Berghoff (2007). The far fewer records of those associated with leaf-cutter ants (Myrmicinae) were last reviewed by Disney (1994), but since then knowledge of the parasitoid species has increased for phorids of the genera Apocephalus, Neodohrniphora, and Myrmosicarius (Braganca et al. 1998, 2002; Brown 1997, 2001, Disney 1996, Disney et al. 2006, Feener & Brown 1993; Feener & Moss 1990, Tonhasca 1996, Tonhasca et al. 2001). During a study of the parasitoid genus Myrmosicarius Borgmeier (Diptera: Phoridae), whose preferred hosts are leaf-cutter ants (Disney et al. 2006), other mymecophilous and parasitoid species of scuttle fly were also observed and collected from colonies of the same ants. In addition, some phorids 1 Museum of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, ENGLAND Email: [email protected] 2 Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, R.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Strategies of Phorid Parasitoids and Responses of Their Hosts, the Leaf-Cutting Ants
    Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 12 | Article 135 Elizalde and Folgarait Behavioral strategies of phorid parasitoids and responses of their hosts, the leaf-cutting ants Luciana Elizalde1,2a*, Patricia Julia Folgarait1b 1Laboratorio de Hormigas, Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina 2Laboratorio Ecotono, Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina Downloaded from Abstract Host-searching and oviposition behaviors of parasitoids, and defensive responses of the hosts, are fundamental in shaping the ecology of host-parasitoid interactions. In order to uncover key behavioral features for the little known interactions between phorid parasitoids (Diptera: http://jinsectscience.oxfordjournals.org/ Phoridae) and their leaf-cutting ant hosts (Formicidae: Attini), host-related behavioral strategies (i.e., host searching and oviposition) for 13 phorid species, and host defensive responses (i.e., hitchhikers and particular body postures) for 11 ant species, were studied. Data was collected at 14 localities, one of them characterized by its high species richness for this host-parasitoid system. Phorid species showed both great variation and specificity in attacking behaviors. Some chose their hosts using either an ambush or an actively searching strategy, while some species attacked ants on different body parts, and specialized on ants performing different tasks, such as when ants were foraging, removing wastes to refuse piles, or repairing the nest. Combining all by guest on June 6, 2016 the behaviors recorded, most phorid species differed in performance in at least one, making it possible to recognize species in the field through their behavior. Phorid species that attacked hosts with greater activity levels showed overall higher attack rates, although there was no significant correlation between attack rates by most phorid species and ant activity outside the nest while parasitoids were attacking.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Entitled Influence of Soil-Quality on Coffee-Plant Quality
    A Thesis entitled Influence of Soil-Quality on Coffee-Plant Quality and a Complex Tropical Insect Food Web by David J. Gonthier Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science in Biology (Ecology track) Dr. Stacy Philpott, Committee Chair Dr. Scott Heckathorn, Committee Member Dr. Ivette Perfecto, Committee Member Dr. Patricia Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2010 Copyright 2010, David J. Gonthier This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of Influence of Soil-Quality on Coffee-Plant Quality and a Complex Tropical Insect Food Web by David J. Gonthier Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science in Biology (Ecology track) The University of Toledo May 2010 Tropical systems are complex, species diverse, and are often regulated by top-down forces (higher trophic levels control lower trophic levels). In many ecosystems insects, especially herbivores and their mutualists, may be strongly affected by plant quality and other bottom-up controls (nutrient availability, plant genetic variation, ect.). Yet few have asked how plant quality (nutritional and defensive plant traits) can contribute to the population regulation and the complexity of these systems. In this thesis, I investigate the importance of soil-quality to both the elemental and secondary metabolite content in coffee and ask how changes to plant quality can influence hemipteran herbivores, their ant-mutualists, predators, and insect communities in a tropical coffee agroecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Estrutura Da Comunidade De Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) No Estado Do Paraná, Brasil: Composição, Sazonalidade E Tamanho Corporal
    Adelita Maria Linzmeier ESTRUTURA DA COMUNIDADE DE CHRYSOMELIDAE (COLEOPTERA) NO ESTADO DO PARANÁ, BRASIL: COMPOSIÇÃO, SAZONALIDADE E TAMANHO CORPORAL Tese apresentada ao Curso de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas, área de concentração em Entomologia, da Universidade Federal do Paraná, para a obtenção do título de Doutora em Ciências Biológicas. Orientadora: Profª. Drª. Cibele S. Ribeiro- Costa CURITIBA 2009 À meus pais Waldir e Eliana ii Agradecimentos Agradeço à minha orientadora, Profª Drª Cibele Stramare Ribeiro-Costa por toda a dedicação, atenção, conhecimentos compartilhados, confiança, amizade, sugestões, críticas, incentivo, ao apoio incondicional para meu crescimento profissional e pessoal. À Profª Drª Lucia Massutti de Almeida pela atenção, auxílio, amizade e presteza sempre que precisei de sua ajuda e colaboração. Ao Prof. Dr Renato Contin Marinoni por ter disponibilizado o material para que este estudo fosse realizado. Por sua amizade, carinho e paciência sempre que precisei tirar dúvidas. Ao Curso de Pós-graduação em Entomologia da Universidade Federal do Paraná, pela oportunidade e pelo acolhimento recebido durante estes quatro anos para que eu pudesse desenvolver este projeto. Aos professores do Curso de Pós-graduação em Entomologia, em especial à Profª Drª Luciane Marinoni, Profª Drª Mirna M. Casagrande, Profª Drª Sonia M. N. Lazzari, Profª Drª Maria Christina de Almeida, Prof. Dr. Mário A. Navarro da Silva, Prof. Dr. Claudio J. B. de Carvalho, Prof. Dr. Gabriel A. R. de Melo e Prof. Dr. Rodney R. Cavichioli pela convivência, amizade e conhecimentos compartilhados. Ao Dr. Alexander S. Konstantinov do National Museum of Natural History – Smithsonian Institution pela hospitalidade com que me recebeu em sua casa durante minha visita à Washington, D.C., USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Del Cañón De La Peregrina, Victoria, Tamaulipas, México
    GALERUCINAE (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) DEL CAÑÓN DE LA PEREGRINA, VICTORIA, TAMAULIPAS, MÉXICO Uriel Jeshua Sánchez-Reyes1, Santiago Niño-Maldonado2, Ludivina Barrientos-Lozano1, Jonathan Edgardo Banda- Hernández1 y Arturo Medina-Puente2. 1Instituto Tecnológico de Cd. Victoria, Blvd. Emilio Portes Gil No.1301, C.P. 87010. Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, México. 2Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Centro Universitario Victoria, C.P. 87149. Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, México. [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] RESUMEN. El presente estudio se desarrolló en el Cañón de la Peregrina, municipio de Victoria, Tamaulipas. El objetivo fue determinar la fauna de Galerucinae presente en la zona, además de analizar la variación altitudinal y estacional del grupo. Se realizaron 240 muestreos, donde se registraron 1,828 ejemplares distribuidos en 76 especies y 38 géneros. Se encontró que la abundancia disminuye y la diversidad aumenta conforme se incrementa el gradiente elevacional. La mayor riqueza se presentó en el matorral espinoso tamaulipeco. Invierno es la estación con mayor número de ejemplares; primavera registró el mayor número de especies, mientras que la diversidad fue mayor en verano. La escasa similitud existente entre sitios y estaciones sugiere un elevado recambio de especies. Palabras clave: Galerucinae, riqueza de especies, abundancia, diversidad Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) from Peregrina Canyon, Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico ABSTRACT. The present study was conducted in the Peregrina Canyon, municipality of Victoria, Tamaulipas. The objectives were to determine the Galerucinae fauna present in the area, and analyze the altitudinal and seasonal variation of the group. A total of 1,828 specimens were collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
    334 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997 FEEDING RECORDS OF COSTA RICAN LEAF BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) R. WILLS FLOWERS1 AND DANIEL H. JANZEN2 1Agricultural Research Programs, Florida A&M University Tallahassee, FL 32307-4100, rfl[email protected] 2Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 [email protected] ABSTRACT Host plant associations are given for 137 species representing 7 subfamilies and 92 genera of Costa Rican Chrysomelidae. A numeric score is introduced to objectively describe confidence that a field observation of an interaction between a chrysomelid and a plant represents true herbivory. Literature host plant records, if they exist, are given for included chrysomelid taxa. Key Words: herbivory, Criocerinae, Chrysomelinae, Cryptocephalinae, Eumolpinae, Galerucinae, Hispinae, Lamprosominae, host plants RESUMEN Se presentan asociaciones de plantas hospederas para 137 especies de Chrysome- lidae de Costa Rica, representando 7 subfamilias y 92 géneros de escarabajos. Se in- troduce una calificación numérica para describir objetivamente la confianza en que una observación de campo de una interacción entre un escarabajo y una planta repre- senta un caso verdadero de herbivoría. Se presentan datos de plantas hospederas de la literatura, si existen, para los taxa de escarabajos incluidos. In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in relationships between tropi- cal plants and insects. The interest is driven by the related agendas of studying them for their intrinsic scientific interest, and protecting tropical biodiversity through find- ing practical and non-destructive ways to use it. The latter agenda is exemplified by the biochemical prospecting programs recently started in several areas of the world (Reid et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Wax Structures of Scymnus Louisianae Attenuate Aggression from Aphid-Tending Ants
    CHEMICAL ECOLOGY Wax Structures of Scymnus louisianae Attenuate Aggression From Aphid-Tending Ants EZRA G. SCHWARTZBERG,1,2 KENNETH F. HAYNES,1 DOUGLAS W. JOHNSON,1 1 AND GRAYSON C. BROWN Environ. Entomol. 39(4): 1309Ð1314 (2010); DOI: 10.1603/EN09372 ABSTRACT The cuticular wax structures of Scymnus louisianae J. Chapin larvae were investigated as a defense against ant aggression by Lasius neoniger Emery. The presence of wax structures provided signiÞcant defense against ant aggression compared with denuded larvae in that these structures attenuated the aggressive behavior of foraging ants. Furthermore, reapplication of wax dissolved in hexane partially restored defenses associated with intact structures, showing an attenuation of aggression based in part on cuticular wax components rather than solely on physical obstruction to ant mouthparts. KEY WORDS Scymnus louisianae, Aphis glycines, Lasius neoniger, ant-tending Many ants tend aphids and use the collected honeydew wax in promoting physical obstruction to the mouthparts as a sugar source. In return, the aphids beneÞt from the of aphid-tending ants, little has been done to elucidate tending ants (Way 1963, Ho¨lldobler and Wilson 1990). In the role that wax plays in eliciting avoidance behavior or these systems, aphids can beneÞt through reduced pre- in attenuating aggression. SpeciÞcally, physical or chem- dation (Banks 1962) and increased Þtness (Flatt and ical mimicry, camoußage, or repellency has not been Weisser 2000). The relationship between ants and aphids looked at as a potential means of avoidance of ant ag- is often a mutualistic one but ranges from obligatory to gression in the Scymnus beetles. It has been suggested facultative (Dixon 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • 94: Frank & Mccoy Intro. 1 INTRODUCTION to INSECT
    Behavioral Ecology Symposium ’94: Frank & McCoy Intro. 1 INTRODUCTION TO INSECT BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY : THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE BEAUTIFUL: NON-INDIGENOUS SPECIES IN FLORIDA INVASIVE ADVENTIVE INSECTS AND OTHER ORGANISMS IN FLORIDA. J. H. FRANK1 AND E. D. MCCOY2 1Entomology & Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 2Biology Department and Center for Urban Ecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620-5150 ABSTRACT An excessive proportion of adventive (= “non-indigenous”) species in a community has been called “biological pollution.” Proportions of adventive species of fishes, am- phibia, reptiles, birds and mammals in southern Florida range from 16% to more than 42%. In Florida as a whole, the proportion of adventive plants is about 26%, but of in- sects is only about 8%. Almost all of the vertebrates were introduced as captive pets, but escaped or were released into the wild, and established breeding populations; few arrived as immigrants (= “of their own volition”). Almost all of the plants also were in- troduced, a few arrived as immigrants (as contaminants of shipments of seeds or other cargoes). In contrast, only 42 insect species (0.3%) were introduced (all for bio- logical control of pests, including weeds). The remainder (about 946 species, or 7.6%) arrived as undocumented immigrants, some of them as fly-ins, but many as contami- nants of cargoes. Most of the major insect pests of agriculture, horticulture, human- made structures, and the environment, arrived as hitchhikers (contaminants of, and stowaways in, cargoes, especially cargoes of plants). No adventive insect species caus- ing problems in Florida was introduced (deliberately) as far as is known.
    [Show full text]