MAE 301 / 5 01 , FAL L 2006, L EC TURE NO TES
BERNARD MASKIT
1 . I ntroduction
1 .1 . What is mat hematics? It is no t at al l easy to say what mat h e mat i c s is, but , in
bro ad outline, it is a way of thought, or co llect io n of ways of thought. These often co nce rn
pro bl e ms ar i s i n g in the re al world, whe re the mat h e mat i c al pro b l e m so l v i ng st art s wi t h the
co nst ruct io n of a mat h e mat i c al mo d e l of the re al- wo rl d pro bl e m; then so l v i ng this mat h e -
mat i c al pro b l e m; then translating the so l ut i o n back to the re al world; an d , nally, as k i n g
the quest io n: how we l l do e s this mat h e mat i c al so l ut i o n ac t u al l y so l ve the original pro bl e m.
Man y people have the mi s t ake n no t i o n that mat h e m at i c s c o nsi st s of a co llect io n of " mo d e l
pro bl e ms" , an d that the go al of mat h e mat i c s educatio n is to teach these " mo d e l pro bl e ms"
an d their so l ut i o ns, so that the st ude nts can so l ve mat h e mat i c al pro bl e ms that ar e exam p l e s
of these " mo d e l pro bl e ms" . One of the go al s of MAE 301 /501 is to di sabuse people of this
no t i o n.
Wh i l e we can' t re all y say what mat h e mat i c s is, we can gi ve an ap p r o ximat e an s wer to
the quest io n of what mat h e mat i c s is al l ab o u t . First of al l , there ar e mathematical objec t s,
such as numbers, se t s , matrices, t riangles an d pro babi l i t i e s. Then there ar e func tio ns or
proce sse s, such as ad d i n g two numbers, forming the co mplement of a se t , nd i ng the inve r s e
of a no n- si ngular mat r i x, c o ns t ruc t i ng the me d i ans of a t riangle or writ i ng a formul a for
the pro bability of a compound event. Finally, there ar e pro o fs or thoughts or so l ut i o ns to
they mo r e or le ss c o mpri s e what mat h e m at i c i an s pro bl e ms; these ar e di - c ul t to de s c ri b e , an d
do ; one imp o rt ant exam p l e wo u l d be to view the se t of al l func t i o ns fro m one se t to an o t h e r
as a ne w mat hemat ic al o b j ect .
Mat h e m at i c i a n s re all y do n' t li ke to go ar o u n d in ci rcle s, so we wi l l no t furt he r pu rs ue
the quest io n of what mat h e mat i c s is, bu t rat h e r st art talking ab o u t mat h e mat i c al ob j ects,
co nst ruct io ns an d ot her pro c e sse s, an d thoughts. We ar e go i n g to be pri mari l y mat h e mat i c al
in this develo pment; that is, we' ll st art wi t h so me un de n e d ob j ects an d pro c e s s e s , an d then
careful l y, an d lo gic ally, bu i l d up ot her ob j ects, an d pro c e sse s or o p erat io ns that wo r k wi t h
them, even ot her kinds of o b j ect s an d ot her kinds of pro cesses. This de vel o pment will, to
so me mi n o r extent, mi r r o r the hi s t o ri c al de vel o pment.
1 .2. Basic m at he m at i c al objects. First of al l , we ne e d so me kind of o b j ect , so met hi ng to
talk ab o u t . The us u al ob j ects wi t h which mat h e mat i c i ans st art ar e the nat u ral numbers, N ,
an d there wi t h whi ch we co unt; that is, 1 ; 2 ; 3 ; 4 ; : : : . Not ice that we st art at 1 , there is no 0,
ar e no n e gat i ve numbers. Associated wi t h the nat ural numbers, we have two pro c e sse s.
2 BERNARD MAS K I T
First, we can co unt in clumps; that is, we can ad d numbers. Addition sat i se s the two
rul e s :
Co mmutativity of a ddit io n : For al l nat ural numbers a an d b , a + b = b + a ;
an d
Associativity of a ddit io n : For al l nat ural numbers a , b an d c , ( a + b ) + c = a + ( b + c ).
Next we o b se rve that we can ad d in clumps, that is, mul t i pl y. Mul t i p l i c at i o n al s o sat i se s
two ru l e s , which we call by the same name s :
Co mmutativity of multiplica t io n: For al l nat ural numbers a an d b , ab = ba;
an d
Associativity of m u lt i p li c a t i o n : For al l nat ural numbers a; b; c , ( ab ) c = a ( bc).
Question: Why ar e these ru l e s c o nc e rni n g di #erent op erations called by the same names?
There is al s o a rul e , the di s t ri but i ve rul e , co ncerning the co nnect io n between these two
operations: For al l nat ural numbers, a; b; c , a ( b + c ) = ( ab ) + ( ac).
Problem 1.1. What ha ppens to this ru le if yo u in t e rchange a ddit io n and mu ltiplica t io n?
1 .3. Inve r s e o p er at io ns . Is there an inve r s e o p eratio n ( subt ract i o n) to ad d i t i o n ? Wh e n is
it de ne d? That is, for whi ch a an d b can we so l ve the equatio n a x = b ?
Problem 1 .2. Is the re a na t u ral numbe r a so that the eq ua t io n a x = b ca n always be
so lved? Never be so lved?
Problem 1 .3. Is the re a na t u ral nu m b e r b for whic h the eq ua t io n a x = b ca n always be
so lved? Never be so lved?
We do n' t have the to ols to prove it , bu t we know that subt ract i o n is al ways un i q ue ; that
is, if a = b + x an d a = b + y , then x = y .
We can l i kewi se as k the quest io n: Is there an inve r s e op eration ( divisio n) to mul t i pl i c at i o n ?
That is, can we so l ve the equatio n ax = b for x . Wh e n can we so l ve this equatio n?
Problem 1.4. Is the re a na t u ral nu m b e r a so that the eq u a t io n ax = b always ha s a so lutio n?
Never ha s a so lutio n?
Problem 1.5. Is the re a na t u ral numbe r b for whic h the eq u a t io n ax = b always ha s a
so lut io n? Never ha s a so lut io n?
We al s o do n' t have the to ols to prove that di v i si o n is al ways uniq ue ; that is, if a = bx an d
a = by, then x = y .
co mplet ely o rdered. That is, for 1 .4. Order. The nat ural numbers ar e al s o nat urall y an d
every pair of n at ural numbers, a an d b , eit her a < b , b < a , or a = b , an d exac t l y one of
these three possibilities ho l ds.
The ma j o r rul e of order is tra nsitivity: If a < b an d b < c , then a < c . Also, for every
a $= 1 , 1 < a .
There ar e al s o re l at i o n s between the arit hmet ic op erations an d order: Fo r al l numbers a
an d b , a < a + b , an d b < a + b . Also, if b $= 1 , then a < ab .
MAE 301/501, FAL L 2006, LE C TURE NO T E S 3
We o bse rve that so me numbers ar e mul t i p l e s of 2, ot hers ar e no t ; we need to be ab l e to
talk ab o u t al l numbers that ar e (or ar e no t ) mul t i pl e s of 2; i. e . , even an d odd numbers.
2. 5AJI
So far , we have one kind of mat h e mat i c al ob j ects: Natural numbers. In order to form mo r e
kinds of mat h e mat i c al ob j ects, we ne e d to form co llect io ns of them, or se t s. The ob j ects
wi t hi n a se t ar e called elements. We wri t e N 2 ) to me an that the element N lie s in the se t
) .
In order to avo i d phi l o s o ph i c al di! c ult ies, we take the view that a se t do e s no t exist until
it has been de #ne d . It can be de #n e d by list ing it s elements, or it can be de #n e d as a subse t
of an o t h e r se t by so me number of de # ni n g properties.
Wh i l e we have st art e d wi t h the nat ural numbers, there ar e many ot her po ssible st art i ng
points, such as ge o m e t r i c ob j ects, events in a pro babi l i t y space , et c. Wh e r e v e r we st art , we
must have a unive rsa l se t , which pre s c ri b e s the universe wi t hin which we ar e wo r k i n g , an d
al l se t s und e r di sc ussi o n ar e subse t s of this un i vers al se t .
We can al s o talk ab o u t one se t as being a subse t of an o t h e r ; that is, ) is a subset of * if
every element of ) is al s o an element of * . In this case, we wri t e ) * .
including The re is al s o an empty se t , ; , whi ch has no elements, an d is a subse t of every se t ,
it self.
2. 1 . The al geb r a of set s. The al g e b r a of se t s has a ri ch s t ruc t ure , wi t h three o p eratio ns,
un i o n ( [ ), intersection ( \ ) an d c o mp l e me nt ( ). Recall that N 2 ) [ * if ei t her N 2 ) or
N 2 * . (As al ways in mat h e mat i c s , the co nj unct i o n ) or* is taken in it s we a k se nse ; that is,
) N 2 ) or N 2 * * includes the p o ssibility that N 2 ) and N 2 * .) Also, N 2 ) \ * if N 2 )
an d N 2 * . Finally, N 2 ) if N 62 ) .
We wi l l quickly re v i e w the laws governi n g these o p eratio ns.
The operation of forming the uni o n of se t s is bot h co mmut at i ve an d as s o c i at i ve :
) [ * = * [ ) , an d ( ) [ * ) [ + = ) [ ( * [ + ).
The operation of forming the int ersect io n of se t s is bot h co mmut at i ve an d asso ciative:
( * \ + ). ) \ * = * \ ) , an d ( ) \ * ) \ + = ) \
The operation of forming the c o mp l e me nt of a se t is an in v o lu t io n :
( ) ) = ) .
The re ar e two d i s t ri bu t i ve laws re l at i ng uni o n an d int ersect io n:
) [ ( * \ + ) = ( ) [ * ) \ ( ) [ + ), an d ) \ ( * [ + ) = ( ) \ * ) [ ( ) \ + ).
Finally, there ar e two laws re l at i ng co mplements wi t h unio ns an d int ersect io ns:
( ) [ * ) = ( ) ) \ ( * ), an d ( ) \ * ) = ( ) ) [ ( * ).
Problem 2. 1 . Sho w that ) * if and only if ) [ * = * .
Problem 2. 2. Sho w that ) * if and only if ) \ * = ) .
4 BERNARD MAS K I T
Problem 2. 3. Sho w that A B if and only if B A .
2. 2. Venn diagrams. It is often use ful to us e Venn d i agr am s to und e rst and co mplicated
co mbi nat i o ns of these symbols.
2. 3. Sets of na t u r a l numb e r s . We can now form se veral se t s of n at ural numbers, such
as the se t of even numbers, the se t of odd numbers, the se t of number di v i s i bl e by 7, the
5 whe n di v i de d by 8, et c. Then we can use the se t se t of numbers leaving a r e mai n d e r of
operations to form ne w se t s.
2. 4. D ivi s ib ili t y and prime num b e r s . A number a is prim e if, whenever you writ e a = bc,
(recall that we ar e only working wi t h the nat u ral numbers) then eit her b = a or c = a , bu t
no t bot h (we do no t wa nt to include 1 as a prime number) .
Problem 2. 4. List the rs t 20 prim e nu mb e rs.
We say that a div ide s b , if there is a number c so that b = ac. Not e that, for al l numbers
a , a di v i de s a . Not e al s o that 1 di v i de s every number.
Problem 2. 5. Sho w that if a div ide s b and a div ide s c , the n a div ide s b + c .
Problem 2. 6. Is the co nv e rse true ? That is , is it true that if a div ide s b + c , the n a div ide s
b and a div ide s c ?
Problem 2. 7. Sho w that if a div ide s b , and a do e s no t div ide c , the n a do e s no t div ide b + c .
Problem 2. 8 . Prove that for every numbe r a , the re is a prim e nu m b e r grea t e r than a .
(HINT: Sin c e the na t u ral nu m b e rs are the co unting numbe rs, we kn o w that the re are only
nit e ly ma ny nu m b e rs le s s than any gi v e n nu m b e r. )
3. The Integers
Not being ab l e to subt ract is unsat i sfying; we ne e d a ne w kind of number to re pre s e nt for
this end, we form a ne w se t of o b j ect s, n e gat i ve integers: 1 ; 2 ; : : : , exam p l e 3 5. To
an d an o t h e r ne w ob j ect: 0. The se t of integers co nsist s of the positive integers, the n e ga t i ve
integers an d zero. We know how to ad d an d mul t i pl y these numbers; in fac t , one can writ e
do wn the rul e s in terms of ad d i t i o n an d mul t i pl i c at i o n of nat ural numbers.
Problem 3. 1 . Write do w n the ru le s for addition of in t e ge rs ; that is , de ne the sum of a
positive nu m b e r and a ne ga t iv e nu m b e r, and de ne the su m of two negative nu m b e rs.
The ru l e for mul t i pl i c at i o n is mo r e di / c ul t , but only co nce pt ually: Why sho uld it be true
that ( 1 )( 1 ) = +1 ? It is no t easy, perhaps i mp o ssi bl e , to gi v e a re al wo r l d expl anat i o n ,
bu t there is a st raightforward mat hemat ic al expl anat i o n, which go e s as follows: It is clear
fro m the po int of view of ab s o l u t e val u e that the pro duct must be eit her +1 or 1 . It is al s o
MAE 301/501, FAL L 2006, LE C TURE NO T E S 5
clear that, si nc e (+1 ) a = a for al l a , (+1 )( 1 ) = 1 . So, if we wa nt di v i si o n to be uniq ue ,
we must have that ( 1 )( 1 ) = +1 .
It is a lo ng an d so met i mes tedious job, once one has de ne d ad d i t i o n an d mul t i pl i c at i o n of
integers, to ch e c k that the rul e s of co mmut at i v i t y, as s o c i at i v i t y an d dist ribut i v i t y st i l l ap p l y.
Problem 3. 2. Sho w that the co mm u t a t ive la w s for bo t h a ddit io n and m u lt i p li c a t i o n ho ld for
all in t e ge rs .
If a > b , then we al r e ad y know what is a b ; that is, we can so l ve the equatio n b + x = a .
The ne gat i ve numbers have b een de n e d so that we can so l ve the equatio n b + x = a , for al l
integers, a an d b . We al s o kno w that the so l ut i o n is uni q ue .
Problem 3. 3. It is no t quite true that div is io n of in t e ge rs is uniqu e . Fin d all ca se s whe re
it is no t unique .
Now that we ar e wo r ki n g wi t hi n the re alm of integers, we can recall the Euclidean (division)
al go r i t h m :
Theorem 3. 1 . Le t p and q be positive i n t e ge rs , the n the re are no n- ne ga t iv e in t e ge rs , s and
r < q , so that p = sq + r .
4. Logic
4. 1 . For m al lo gic . We will no t do much wi t h fo r mal lo gic he re , but we do ne e d to un-
de rs t and so met hi ng about it . The basi c o b j ect s in fo rmal lo gic ar e propositions, such as :
" 1 + 1 = 2" , or " Ic e is co lder than wa t e r . " Every proposition is eit her t rue or fal s e
Problem 4. 1 . Write an English se nte nce that ha s the format of a proposition, but is ne it he r
true no r false .
Propositions can be co mbi n e d us i ng the co nnect ives 'and' an d 'or'; no t e that the co nnect ive
'or' is the we a k form of this word; that is; the proposition: . a an d b / is t rue if an d only if
bot h a an d b ar e t rue ; . a or b / is true if eit her a is true, or b is t rue , or they ar e bot h true.
(The st ro ng form, whe re . a or b / me ans that eit her a is t rue or b is true, bu t they ar e no t
bot h true, is ne ver use d in mat h e mat i c s . )
The proposition . a an d b / is written as : a ^ b , whi l e the pro p o s t i o n . a or b / is written as
a _ b .
There is al s o the unary op eration of ne gat i o n: The ne gat i o n of a , written as a , is true
if an d only if a is fal s e .
ar e clo sely re l at e d to the ru l e s The rul e s for co mbi ni n g propositions al o n g wi t h n e gat i o n
for co mb i ni ng uni o n s, int ersect io ns an d co mplements of se t s . That is:
a _ b is true if an d only if b _ a is t rue .
a _ ( b _ c ) is true if an d only if ( a _ b ) _ c is true.
a ^ b is true if an d only if b ^ a is t rue .
This ra i s es an interesting problem in that on e can wr i t e down English sentences that lo ok like prop os i -
tions, but wh i c h are neit h er true nor fal s e.
6 BERNARD MAS K I T