Redalyc.Activity of Plant Aqueous Extracts on Bacillus Thuringiensis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New Synonymies and Combinations in Argyrostrotis Hübner
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 149: 107–116 (2011)New synonymies and combinations in Argyrostrotis Hübner... 107 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.149.2347 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research New synonymies and combinations in Argyrostrotis Hübner (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Erebinae, Poaphilini) J. Bolling Sullivan1, J. Donald Lafontaine2 1 200 Craven St., Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 USA 2 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arach- nids, and Nematodes, Biodiversity Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 Corresponding author: J. Bolling Sullivan ([email protected]), J. Donald Lafontaine ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Schmidt | Received 26 March 2011 | Accepted 4 October 2011 | Published 24 November 2011 Citation: Sullivan JB, Lafontaine JD (2011) New synonymies and combinations in Argyrostrotis Hübner (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Erebinae, Poaphilini). In: Schmidt BC, Lafontaine JD (Eds) Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths III. ZooKeys 149: 107–116. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.149.2347 Abstract After examining the type specimens of species in the eastern North American genus Argyrostrotis the number of known species in the genus is reduced from 10 to six through synonymy. A key to species is included along with illustrations of the adults and genitalia of each species. Three Neotropical species currently included in Argyrostrotis (Argyrostrotis eurysaces Schaus, 1914; Argyrostrotis quadrata Dognin, 1910; and Celiptera surrufula Dyar, 1913) are transferred to other genera as Argyrosticta eurysaces (Schaus, 1914), comb. n. [Noctuidae: Bagisarinae], Heterochroma quadrata (Dognin, 1910), comb. n. [Noctuidae: Amphipyrinae], and Ptichodis surrufula (Dyar, 1913), comb. -
Erebidae-Erebinae.Pdf
Erebidae Erebinae Achaea janata (Linnaeus, 1758) Taxonomy: Phalaena janata Linnaeus, 1758; 527.– . Phalaena melicerta Drury, [1773]:46,. – India (Bombay). Noctua tigrina Fabricius, 1775. Noctua cyathina Macleay, 1826 . Catocala traversii Fereday, 1877. Ophiusa ekeikei Bethune-Baker, 1906. melicertoides Strand, 1914: 74. Imago melicertella Strand, 1914: 74. Achaea melicertoides Gaede, 1938. Achaea melicertella Gaede, 1938. Hostplant: Flight period: viii. Altitude: 460 m. Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Achaea serva (Fabricius, 1775) Taxonomy: Noctua serva Fabricius, 1775. Achaea fasciculipes Walker, 1858. fuscosuffusa Strand, 1914: 73. Achaea fuscosuffusa Gaede, 1938. Hostplant: Flight period: ix. Altitude: 2900 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Agonista hypoleuca Guenee, 1852 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Arcte polygrapha Kollar, 1844 Taxonomy: Arcte polygrapha Kollar, 1844± ./ In- dia (Himalaya) Hostplant Flight period: v, viii. Altitude: 460-1975 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Artena dotata (Fabricius, 1794) Taxonomy: Noctua dotata Fabricius, 1794: 55.– E. India. Hostplant: Flight period: v-vi. Altitude: 1580-2020 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Blepharidia griseirufa Hampson, 1894 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Capnodes caustiplaga Hampson, 1895 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Capnodes pustulifera Walker, 1864 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Catocala nupta (Linnaeus, 1767) Taxonomy: Phalaena nupta Linnaeus, 1767: 841.– Germany. Catocala unicuba Walker, [1858]:1210.– India. Hostplant: Populus, P. nigra, Salix, S. fragilis Flight period: ix. Altitude: 2900 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Chrysopera combinans (Walker, 1858) Taxonomy: Achaea combinans Walker, 1858: 1399.- Ceylon. -
Molecular Systematics of Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera)
TURUN YLIOPISTON JULKAISUJA ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS TURKUENSIS SARJA - SER. AII OSA - TOM. 268 BIOLOGICA - GEOGRAPHICA - GEOLOGICA MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF NOCTUOIDEA (INSECTA, LEPIDOPTERA) REZA ZAHIRI TURUN YLIOPISTO UNIVERSITY OF TURKU Turku 2012 From the Laboratory of Genetics, Division of Genetics and Physiology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, FIN-20012, Finland Supervised by: Docent Niklas Wahlberg University of Turku Finland Co-advised by: Ph.D. J. Donald Lafontaine Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes Canada Ph.D. Ian J. Kitching Natural History Museum U.K. Ph.D. Jeremy D. Holloway Natural History Museum U.K. Reviewed by: Professor Charles Mitter University of Maryland U.S.A. Dr. Tommi Nyman University of Eastern Finland Finland Examined by: Dr. Erik J. van Nieukerken Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, Leiden The Netherlands Cover image: phylogenetic tree of Noctuoidea ISBN 978-951-29-5014-0 (PRINT) ISBN 978-951-29-5015-7 (PDF) ISSN 0082-6979 Painosalama Oy – Turku, Finland 2012 To Maryam, my mother and father MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF NOCTUOIDEA (INSECTA, LEPIDOPTERA) Reza Zahiri This thesis is based on the following original research contributions, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Zahiri, R, Kitching, IJ, Lafontaine, JD, Mutanen, M, Kaila, L, Holloway, JD & Wahlberg, N (2011) A new molecular phylogeny offers hope for a stable family-level classification of the Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera). Zoologica Scripta, 40, 158–173 II Zahiri, R, Holloway, JD, Kitching, IJ, Lafontaine, JD, Mutanen, M & Wahlberg, N (2012) Molecular phylogenetics of Erebidae (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea). Systematic Entomology, 37,102–124 III Zaspel, JM, Zahiri, R, Hoy, MA, Janzen, D, Weller, SJ & Wahlberg, N (2012) A molecular phylogenetic analysis of the vampire moths and their fruit-piercing relatives (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Calpinae). -
Merging Science and Management in a Rapidly
Preliminary Assessment of the Moth (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) Fauna of Rincon de Guadalupe, Sierra de Bacadéhuachi, Sonora, Mexico John D. Palting Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona Abstract—The Sierra de Bacadéhuachi is a poorly sampled extension of the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) located in east-central Sonora near the town of Bacadéhuachi. Sampling of moths using mercury vapor and ultraviolet lights occurred in summer and fall 2011, and spring 2012 at Rincón de Guadalupe, located in pine-oak forest at 1680 m elevation. Approximately 400 taxa of moths were identified from this locality. Species occurrences demonstrate connections to the famously diverse Yécora area, to the higher, more me- sic SMO in Chihuahua, as well as the Rocky Mountains to the north. Several unidentified and presumably new moth species from Rincón de Guadalupe await further study and description. Two species previously known only from the type specimens (destroyed in WWII) were rediscovered at Rincón de Guadalupe. A complete list of the moths identified from Rincon de Guadalupe is available as a Research Species List in the Madrean Archipelago Biodiversity Assessment (MABA)/Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet) online database (Madrean.org). Introduction Bacadéhuachi are Asteraceae (54 taxa), Fabaceae (47 taxa), and Poaceae (36 taxa) (Van Devender and others, Preliminary Flora of The Sierra de Bacadéhuachi is considered the westernmost mas- the Sierra Bacadéhuachi, Sonora, Mexico, this volume). sif of the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO), and is located east of the Pueblo de Bacadéhuachi, Municipio de Bacadéhuachi, Sonora. While technically not a Sky Island, the range represents the northernmost Methods extension of the SMO and serves as a conduit for SMO species to A combination mercury vapor/ultraviolet light or ultraviolet light move north into the Sky Island region. -
Caterpillars on the Foliage of Conifers in the Northeastern United States 1 Life Cycles and Food Plants
INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Coniferous forests are important features of the North American landscape. In the Northeast, balsam fir, spruces, or even pines may dominate in the more northern forests. Southward, conifers still may be prevalent, although the pines become increasingly important. In dry, sandy areas, such as Cape Cod of Massachusetts and the Pine Barrens of New Jersey, hard pines abound in forests composed of relatively small trees. Conifers are classic symbols of survival in harsh environments. Forests of conifers provide not only beautiful scenery, but also livelihood for people. Coniferous trees are a major source of lumber for the building industry. Their wood can be processed to make paper, packing material, wood chips, fence posts, and other products. Certain conifers are cultivated for landscape plants and, of course, Christmas trees. Trees of coniferous forests also supply shelter or food for many species of vertebrates, invertebrates, and even plants. Insects that call these forests home far outnumber other animals and plants. Because coniferous forests tend to be dominated by one to a few species of trees, they are especially susceptible to injury during outbreaks of insects such as the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana, the fall hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria, or the pitch pine looper, Lambdina pellucidaria. Trees that are defoliated by insects suffer reduced growth and sometimes even death. Trees stressed by defoliation, drought, or mechanical injury, are generally more susceptible to attack by wood-boring beetles, diseases, and other organisms. These secondary pests also may kill trees. Stress or tree death can have a negative economic impact upon forest industries. -
Introduction to Macro-Moth Identification
Introduction to Macro-moth Identification David Slade Lepidoptera County Recorder (VC41) Introduction to Macro-moth Identification • What are moths? • How do you identify them • Moth families • Mysteries and pitfalls What is a Moth? Wikipedia says… The moths are a paraphyletic group of insects related to the butterflies and belonging to the order Lepidoptera. Most lepidopterans are moths and there are thought to be approximately 160,000 species of moth, many of which are yet to be described. Most species of moth are nocturnal, but there are also crepuscular and diurnal species. a group is said to be paraphyletic if it consists of all the descendants of the last common ancestor of the group's members minus a small number of monophyletic groups of descendants, typically just one or two such group Wikipedia also says… Lepidoptera is a large order of insects…. It is one of the most widespread and widely recognizable insect orders in the world. The term was coined by Linnaeus in 1735 and is derived from Ancient Greek λεπίδος (scale) and πτερόν (wing). Lepidoptera show many variations of the basic body structure that have evolved to gain advantages in lifestyle and distribution. It is among the four most speciose orders, along with the Hymenoptera, Diptera, and the Coleoptera.[1] Lepidopteran species are characterized by scales covering their bodies and wings, and a proboscis. The scales are modified, flattened "hairs", and give butterflies and moths their extraordinary variety of colours and patterns. Almost all species have some form of membranous wings, except for a few that have reduced wings or are wingless. -
County Genus Species Species Author Common
County Genus Species Species Author Common Name Tribe Subfamily Family Superfamily Woodbury County Acronicta americana (Harris, 1841) American Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Agrotis ipsilon Hufnagel, 1766 Ipsilion Dart Noctuini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Amphipyra glabella (Morrison, 1874) Smooth Amphipyra Amphipyrini Amphipyrinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Amphipyra pyramidoides Guenee, 1852 Copper Underwing Amphipyrini Amphipyrinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Anagrapha falcifera (Kirby, 1837) Celery Looper Moth Plusiini Plusiinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Antheraea polyphemus (Cramer, 1776) Polyphemus Moth Attacini Saturniinae Saturniidae Bombycoidea Woodbury County Apamea burgessi (Morrison, 1874) Phlogophorini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Apamea helva (Grote, 1875) Yellow Three-spot Phlogophorini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Atteva aurea (Fitch, 1856) Ailanthus Webworm Moth (None) Attevinae Yponomeutidae Yponomeutoidea Woodbury County Caenurgina crassiuscula (Haworth, 1809) Clover Looper Moth Euclidiini Erebinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Caenurgina erechtea (Cramer, 1780) Forage Looper Moth Euclidiini Erebinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Catocala abbreviatella Grote, 1872 Abbreviated Underwing Catocalini Erebinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Catocala amatrix (Hubner, 1809-13) The Sweetheart Catocalini Erebinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Woodbury County Catocala illecta Walker, 1858 Magdalen Underwing -
Diversity of Winter-Flying Moths in the Maryville College Woods
DIVERSITY OF WINTER-FLYING MOTHS IN THE MARYVILLE COLLEGE WOODS A Report of a Senior Study by Marley Smith Major: Biology Maryville College Fall, 2016 Date approved , by Faculty Supervisor Date approved , by Division Chair ABSTRACT Lepidopterans, commonly referred to as butterflies and moths, are some of the most widely studied flying insects. Heterocera, or moths, are valuable to ecological and conservational research due to their diversity and geographical range. Their sensitivity to environmental shifts makes them a key indicator species for a variety of climates and habitat types. The goal of this study was to sample the moth population of the Maryville College Woods, a 0.56 km2, mixed-mesophytic forest area in Maryville, Tennessee. Over the course of a three-month winter sampling period, thirty-two species from families Crambidae, Erebidae, Gracillariidae (unknown species), Gelechiidae, Geometridae, Noctuidae and Tortricidae were captured and preserved for identification. The most active temperature range for moths was 8.9 to 12.8˚C, and the most active flight time was between 19:00 and 20:00, when 65.2% of specimens were caught. The null hypothesis that neither temperature (P<0.0001) nor time of day (P<0.0001) would have an effect on the flight of moths over the course of the study was rejected. Several species not found in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park were documented in this study, including undescribed or unusual species, and many ecologically significant pests. With continued sampling and documentation of Lepidopteran species in the Maryville College Woods, this study provides a valuable tool to monitor species and ecosystem function in a fragmented and isolated habitat. -
Dynamic Inventory of Moths of Savitribai Phule Pune University (Pune, India) Through Crowdsourcing Via Inaturalist
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.01.454690; this version posted August 3, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Dynamic inventory of moths of Savitribai Phule Pune University (Pune, India) through crowdsourcing via iNaturalist. Bhalchandra Pujari1 Department of scientific computing modeling and simulation, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007 1 Address for correspondence: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.01.454690; this version posted August 3, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Abstract We present here the checklist of moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) for the campus of Savitribai Phule Pune University, situated in the metropolis of Pune in the state Maharashra in India. We report identi/ication of 189 unique genera along with 154 unique species. Despite the relative small size of the observation area and the location being at the heart of a busy metropolis, the moths were found to be of diverse variety, with 26 different families and 76 tribes. The identifications of the species was crowd-sourced via iNaturalist.org. An automated program was developed to fetch the identi/ication and generate the list. -
A New Genus and Species for Dysgonia (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Erebinae) from Southeastern United States
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysA new39: 85–97 genus (2010) and species for Dysgonia (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Erebinae) from Southeastern... 85 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.39.434 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new genus and species for Dysgonia (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Erebinae) from Southeastern United States J. Bolling Sullivan 200 Craven St., Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 USA urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1D269A70-1054-4C69-A283-B8C24F6AE14C Corresponding author: J. Bolling Sullivan ([email protected]) Academic editor: J.D. Lafontaine | Received 22 January 2010 | Accepted 1 February 2010 | Published 18 March 2010 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5734552B-0B4A-4F28-823F-272011A82376 Citation: Sullivan JB (2010) A new genus and species for Dysgonia (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Erebinae) from Southeastern United States. In: Schmidt BC, Lafontaine JD (Eds) Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths II. ZooKeys 39: 85–97. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.39.434 Abstract Th ree North American species currently placed in the genus Dysgonia Hübner are moved to Neadysgonia gen. n. A fourth species, N. telma, is described from southeastern United States and a neotype is desig- nated for closely related species N. smithii. Th e generic placement of the new genus is discussed. Keywords Taxonomy, Dysgonia, Neadysgonia, Argyrostrotis, United States Introduction Th e genus Dysgonia Hübner as herein restricted currently includes species ranging through the Mediterranean Region and possibly as far east as Australia (Berio 1965). Poole (1989) included species in Dysgonia that give it a world wide distribution, how- ever, the genus as delimited by him is clearly polyphyletic (Holloway and Miller 2003). -
Pine Barrens Zale
Natural Heritage Pine Barrens Zale & Endangered Species Zale lunifera Program State Status: Special Concern www.mass.gov/nhesp Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife DESCRIPTION: The Pine Barrens Zale (Zale lunifera) is an erebid moth with a wingspan of 30-34 mm. The forewing is mottled with pale and dark grays, paler in the subterminal area and between the median area and the antemedial line, darker between the subterminal area and the median area and in the basal area. The brownish-black postmedial line is relatively thin and waved; the brown to brownish-black antemedial line is thicker, also waved. A brownish-black apical dash may be present. The yellowish-brown reniform spot is narrow and elongate, the black orbicular spot small and round. The hind wing is banded with pale and dark brownish-grays; a faint discal spot may be present. The head and thorax is mottled with shades of gray and brown matching those on the forewing, and the abdomen is brownish-gray, similar in color to the Zale lunifera ▪ Specimen from MA: Plymouth Co., Plymouth, collected hind wing. The very similar Intent Zale (Zale intenta) is 10 Jun 2003 by M.W. Nelson slightly larger than the Pine Barrens Zale, often with a more striate wing pattern; the forewing antemedial line is Adult Flight Period in Massachusetts less wavy, and the orbicular spot faint or absent (Schmidt Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010). Genitalic dissection may be necessary for definitive identification. LIFE HISTORY: In Massachusetts, adult Pine Barrens HABITAT: In Massachusetts, the Pine Barrens Zale Zale moths fly from mid-May to late June. -
A Review of the Higher Classification of the Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera) with Special Reference to the Holarctic Fauna
Esperiana Buchreihe zur Entomologie Bd. 11: 7-92 Schwanfeld, 29. Juni 2005 ISBN 3-938249-01-3 A review of the higher classification of the Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera) with special reference to the Holarctic fauna Michael FIBIGER and J. Donald LAFONTAINE Abstract The higher classification of the Noctuoidea (Oenosandridae, Doidae, Notodontidae, Strepsimanidae, Nolidae, Lymantriidae, Arctiidae, Erebidae, Micronoctuidae, and Noctuidae) is reviewed from the perspective of the classification proposed by KITCHING and RAWLINS (1998). Several taxa are reinstated, described as new, synonymised, or redescribed. Some characters that have been inadequately described, poorly understood, or misinterpreted, are redescribed and discussed. One family, two subfamilies, four tribes, and three subtribes are proposed as new. Available family-group names of Noctuoidea are listed in an appendix. Introduction Since 1991 the authors have worked towards a trans-Atlantic / trans-Beringian understanding or agreement between the two sometimes quite incongruent classifications of the Noctuidae used in North America and Eurasia. The necessity to push this work forward and publish our results to date has been precipitated by the need for a new European check list, for the book series Noctuidae Europaeae, and for use in fascicles in the ”Moths of North America (MONA)” book series in North America. When Hermann HACKER and the senior author decided to publish a new systematic list for the Noctuoidea in Europe, we agreed to write this review paper as a supplement to the European