Name, Surname
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ref. Ares(2020)2751335 - 27/05/2020 JANUSZ WOJCIECHOWSKI Commissioner for Agriculture Brussels, 25.05.2020 (2020)3063219 Dear Ms Tolleret, dear Honourable Members, Thank you for your letter of 15 April in which you explain all your concerns relating to the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the European wine sector. I share your concerns about the extremely negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the farming community and on its economy. It was a matter of urgency to provide help and relief to European agricultural producers and to the wine sector in particular. This is why the Commission responded very rapidly by adopting on 30 April and on 4 May last, a package of market measures under Regulation (EU) No 1308/20131. Based on the urgency procedure enabled by Article 228 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, two Delegated Regulations2 are already in force and in application subject to no objection being voiced by the co-legislators. The remaining Delegated Regulation3 was transmitted to the Parliament on the day of its adoption by the Commission. Lastly, nine additional Implementing Regulations adopted by the Commission on 30 April 2020 became applicable as of 4 May 2020. Ms Irene Tolleret Member of the European Parliament European Parliament Bât. WILLY BRANDT - 04M057 60 rue Wiertz B-1047 - Brussels Email: [email protected] 1 Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671 2 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/591 of 30 April 2020 opening a temporary exceptional private storage aid scheme for certain cheeses and fixing the amount of aid in advance Regulation (EU) No 1308/2017 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671, OJ L140 of 4 May 2020, p.1 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/592 of 30 April 2020 on temporary exceptional measures derogating from certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council to address the market disturbance in the fruit and vegetables and wine sectors caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and measures linked to it, OJ L 140 of 4 May 2020, p. 6 3 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) XX/XX of 4 May 2020 derogating in respect of the year 2020 from Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 as regards the fruit and vegetables sector and from Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1149 as regards the wine sector in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic (Adopted by the Commission. To be published at the end of the scrutiny period). Under the particularly serious and damaging circumstances for European agriculture and wine production in particular, I sincerely hope that the European Parliament and the Council will voice without delay their opinion on the Delegated Regulations, so that all the planned improvements, including the increases in the Union’s support rates for measures under the wine Support Programmes, can benefit the European wine sector. You call for a series of necessary measures including green harvesting, crisis distillation and crisis storage. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/592 introduces temporarily crisis distillation and crisis storage in the National Support Programmes in the wine sector (NSP), thus enabling both these measures on a voluntary basis. The price to be paid for the supply of the wine and for its distillation is to be set by Member States that have to ensure the reasonableness of the granted amounts. The legislation ensures that a beneficiary can receive both aid to crisis storage and aid to crisis distillation for different batches of wine. The alcohol resulting from the crisis distillation measure is to be used exclusively for energy or industrial purposes, including disinfection or pharmaceutical as you suggest. Coming to green harvesting, the Commission has foreseen additional flexibilities so that green harvesting can be carried out on parts of a holding, making it possible to reduce the overall yield of a holding. Furthermore, the end date of green harvesting has been extended to give producers more time to make the adequate decisions to manage their production. Moreover, the Commission has increased the Union’s support rate for green harvesting from 50 to 60%. As regards grubbing-up of vineyards, or of any permanent crops such as fruit orchards, the Commission is not in favour to support financially such operations that, in the past, have given a negative image of European agriculture and of the CAP. The solution to today’s crisis is not the destruction of producers’ production potential. The tools provided in the Commission’s recent package are intended to withdrawing certain volumes of wine from the market definitively or temporarily and managing the volume of the upcoming harvest. Today, the European wine policy is geared towards improving quality and competitiveness. Grubbing-up is supported when it is linked to such objectives, as is it the case for restructuring and conversion of vineyards in the framework of the NSP in the Wine Sector. You ask for a necessary reinforcement of promotion activities. This was done already in January to address the consequences of the imposition of a 25% tariff on US imports of certain European wines. With the help of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Commission set up and adopted a whole package of measures4 to improve the framework relating to the promotion of European wines in third countries in the context of wine support programmes. This package of regulations introduces greater flexibility for promotion operations so that among others, beneficiaries are not penalised if they are only partially complete ongoing promotion operations. 4 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/132 of 30 January 2020 laying down an emergency measure in the form of a derogation from Article 45(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards Union contribution to the promotion measure in the wine sector, OJ L 27 of 31.1.2020, p. 20 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/133 of 30 January 2020 derogating from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1150 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the national support programmes in the wine sector, OJ L 27 of 31.1.2020, p. 24 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/419 of 30 January 2020 derogating from Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1149 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the national support programmes in the wine sector, OJ L 84 of 20.3.2020, p. 1 The package also includes an increase in the Union’s support rate for promotion from 50 to 60%. In addition, the above mentioned Delegated Regulation submitted to the opinion of the European Parliament on 4 May last, extends to the promotion measure the scope of the recent improvements, in particular the possibility for beneficiaries to amend the objective of their operations. As regards planting authorisations, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/6015 extends for one year the validity of planting authorisations that expire in 2020 because they could not be activated for reasons linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, or allows holders of authorisations not to implement them with no administrative penalty. Wine growers holding replanting authorisations and authorisations for new plantings are treated in a similar way. This will ensure that the growers are not subject to a reduction of their vineyard area in cases where they are prevented from replanting an area due to the pandemic crisis of COVID-19. In addition, when grubbing up in the context of anticipated replanting was impossible for wine growers in the year 2020, due to reasons linked to the pandemic of COVID-19, Member States have the possibility to give them more time to implement the grubbing up by extending the deadline by up to 12 months. You consider that it is necessary to allow a derogation to the labelling rules regarding the vintage year of a wine. Under the current circumstances of the COVID-19 crisis, it is very difficult to understand the request on the one hand, for measures to remove wine from the market (distillation, storage) and on the other hand, for labelling derogations to address a shortage of wine of the 2020 vintage. I would like to remind you that the wine that will be stored or distilled under our new measures does not have to be this year’s wine. Blending with several harvest years can take place for many reasons, to even out the harvest over a marketing year or to improve the taste or quality of a wine. Thus, producers can always ‘blend’ for technical necessities, but if the harvest year is indicated on the label, which is optional, 85% of the wine must come from that single harvest year. That is a Union rule and even adhered to worldwide. The requested labelling flexibility would go against the wine labelling and quality policy defended so strongly by the wine sector and would mislead the consumer as to the true characteristics of the wine. Therefore, should such labelling derogation become essential and justified by an evolving situation, in all cases, clear information to consumers as regards the percentages of the various vintages used (for example: 75% of 2020 and 25% of 2019 vintage) would be mandatory so that the consumer is not misled.