Explaining the Differential Growth of Peer-To-Peer Car-Sharing in European Cities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Explaining the Differential Growth of Peer-To-Peer Car-Sharing in European Cities Explaining the differential growth of peer-to-peer car-sharing in European cities May 13, 2016 Master‘s Thesis Dennis Franciscus van der Linden UU Student #: 4102908 [email protected] Tel: +31 6 51361606 Utrecht University Study program: Innovation Sciences UU Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Koen Frenken Second reader: Dr. Wouter Boon University of California at Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center (TSRC) Berkeley, California, United States of America Climate-KIC European Institute of Innovation & Technology (EIT) Master label programme Explaining the differential growth of peer-to-peer car-sharing in European cities Dennis F. van der Linden Abstract While car-sharing has proven quite successful in some cities, in other cities the phenomenon of car-sharing is less developed. This study aims to explain these spatial differences in the growth of peer-to-peer (P2P) car-sharing in cities. Firstly, this study shows the current state of P2P car-sharing in cities within the countries United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, Germany, and Belgium. P2P car- sharing shows to be more successful in France and The Netherlands, and less successful in Germany and the United Kingdom when compared to Belgium. Secondly, from a Multi-level perspective (MLP), niche and regime factors were operationalized which can differ on the city level to explain the spatial differences in niche developments and regime interactions. A quantitative research method was applied, using a negative binomial regression model, to test the influence of these city level variables on the number of shared cars. Cities where the regime of personal car ownership and use is less established, indicated by a larger share of trips taken by public transport and a historic city center less suitable for car use shows to lead to more shared P2P cars. User innovativeness, indicated by younger age (24-35yrs) and a higher level of education showed to be beneficial for the growth of the niche of P2P car-sharing. A higher percentage of one-person households also leads to more shared P2P cars. Also the presence of a lot of platform actors within a city showed to be associated with a high number of shared P2P cars. This study also showed that population density did not significantly influences the number of shared cars, indicating that P2P car-sharing might be a more feasible alternative to “traditional” Business-to-consumer car-sharing in less densely populated places. Also, this study showed that protected niche markets. Indicated by a university city or international city are less important to P2P car-sharing, indicating that the supply of P2P cars is less demand driven. It is suggested that the supply of P2P car-sharing is more focused around a personal decision to share a car on a P2P platform. Further research could identify the reasoning behind this personal decision. Master’s Thesis D.F. van der Linden 2 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Theoretical background ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Transition of car-sharing ............................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Measuring the transition: ........................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Landscape pressures ............................................................................................................ 10 2.2.2 Regime pressures ................................................................................................................. 11 2.2.3 Niche developments ............................................................................................................ 12 2.2.3.1 User innovativeness ...................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3.2 Environmental values and practices of inhabitants ...................................................... 14 2.2.3.3 Protective market spaces .............................................................................................. 15 2.2.3.4 Supporting policy .......................................................................................................... 15 2.2.3.5 Activities of platform actors .......................................................................................... 16 3 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 City definition .............................................................................................................................. 17 3.2 Sample selection: ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.3 Operationalization and data collection ....................................................................................... 18 3.3.1 Number of shared P2P cars.................................................................................................. 18 3.3.2 Independent variables ......................................................................................................... 19 3.3.2.1 Regime factors .............................................................................................................. 19 3.3.2.2 Niche factors ................................................................................................................. 20 3.3 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................... 24 4 Results ................................................................................................................................................ 25 4.1 Descriptive statistics ................................................................................................................... 25 4.2 Country comparison .................................................................................................................... 26 4.3 City comparison .......................................................................................................................... 26 4.4 Correlations and multicollinearity .............................................................................................. 28 4.5 Model configuration and assessment of model fit ..................................................................... 29 4.6 Model results .............................................................................................................................. 33 4.7 Transition of car-sharing ............................................................................................................. 34 4.7.1 Regime factors ..................................................................................................................... 34 4.7.2 Niche factors ........................................................................................................................ 36 Master’s Thesis D.F. van der Linden 3 4.7.2.1 User innovativeness ...................................................................................................... 36 4.7.2.2 Environmental values and practices ............................................................................. 37 4.7.2.3 Protective market spaces .............................................................................................. 39 4.7.2.4 Supporting policy .......................................................................................................... 39 4.7.2.5 Activities of platform actors .......................................................................................... 40 5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................... 41 5.1 Limitations of the research ......................................................................................................... 41 5.1.1 Number of shared cars ......................................................................................................... 41 5.1.2 Measuring the success of P2P car-sharing ........................................................................... 42 5.1.3 Use of secondary data sources / official statistics ............................................................... 42 5.1.4 Historic city .......................................................................................................................... 43 5.2 Theoretical implications .............................................................................................................. 43 5.3 Policy implications ...................................................................................................................... 44 5.4 Suggestions
Recommended publications
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Brands
    Global Consumer 2019 List of Brands Table of Contents 1. Digital music 2 2. Video-on-Demand 4 3. Video game stores 7 4. Digital video games shops 11 5. Video game streaming services 13 6. Book stores 15 7. eBook shops 19 8. Daily newspapers 22 9. Online newspapers 26 10. Magazines & weekly newspapers 30 11. Online magazines 34 12. Smartphones 38 13. Mobile carriers 39 14. Internet providers 42 15. Cable & satellite TV provider 46 16. Refrigerators 49 17. Washing machines 51 18. TVs 53 19. Speakers 55 20. Headphones 57 21. Laptops 59 22. Tablets 61 23. Desktop PC 63 24. Smart home 65 25. Smart speaker 67 26. Wearables 68 27. Fitness and health apps 70 28. Messenger services 73 29. Social networks 75 30. eCommerce 77 31. Search Engines 81 32. Online hotels & accommodation 82 33. Online flight portals 85 34. Airlines 88 35. Online package holiday portals 91 36. Online car rental provider 94 37. Online car sharing 96 38. Online ride sharing 98 39. Grocery stores 100 40. Banks 104 41. Online payment 108 42. Mobile payment 111 43. Liability insurance 114 44. Online dating services 117 45. Online event ticket provider 119 46. Food & restaurant delivery 122 47. Grocery delivery 125 48. Car Makes 129 Statista GmbH Johannes-Brahms-Platz 1 20355 Hamburg Tel. +49 40 2848 41 0 Fax +49 40 2848 41 999 [email protected] www.statista.com Steuernummer: 48/760/00518 Amtsgericht Köln: HRB 87129 Geschäftsführung: Dr. Friedrich Schwandt, Tim Kröger Commerzbank AG IBAN: DE60 2004 0000 0631 5915 00 BIC: COBADEFFXXX Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE 258551386 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Scenario Planning for the German Carsharing Industry – 2025
    Strategic Scenario Planning for the German Carsharing Industry – 2025 Carolin von Sethe Working Paper Version 1 March 18th, 2016 I Abstract II I Abstract What happens when the Internet of Things1, traditional mobility and the modern consumer coalesce? Nobody knows yet. The increasing uncertainty and complexity that result from the pace of technological progress, blurring boundaries between industry ecosystems and the volatile macroeconomic environment affect future mobility severely. Carsharing is at the forefront of an evolution that points towards a secular shift from individually owned-and-operated automobiles to mobility-on-demand. The purpose of this study is to develop four plausible scenarios for the future of the German carsharing industry in the year 2025 by applying the HHL- Roland Berger scenario development approach and to establish adequate core and optional strategies to aid strategic decision making of managers from companies in the carsharing ecosystem. Key Words: Scenario-based Strategic Planning ∙ Carsharing ∙ Shared Mobility ∙ Strategic Decision Making 1 The Internet of Things (short: IoT) is a term coined for the network of and communication between all devices with enabled Internet connection (Morgan, 2014). II Table of Contents III II Table of Contents I Abstract ............................................................................................................... II II Table of Contents .............................................................................................. III III Table of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • Wales Green Party
    Wales Green Party 1 CONTENTS Introduction – Anthony Slaughter 2 Our candidates 4 Green Guarantee: Our top 10 points 6 Our Approach 9 Joined-up thinking and policies Listening to science and honesty with the public Responding at scale Leading change that is fair Listening and learning government A Wales that can really work for change Finding the finance Green Window on the Valleys 12 How it fits together 14 Green Window on Rural and Coastal areas 16 Our Plan of Action 18 ENVIRONMENT 19 COMMUNITY 22 WORK 25 GOVERNMENT 28 Green Window on our Cities and Urban areas 32 2 1 his election is taking place in challenging These ambitious plans include the establishment times. The ongoing Covid 19 crisis has of a Green Transformation Fund for Wales which exposed the serious structural and systemic will raise finance, through issuing bonds, to fund: faults in our society and highlighted the ■ building thousands of zero carbon new homes obscene and growing levels of inequality each year thatT are destroying our communities. The coming INTRODUCTION severe financial recession will be made all the worse ■ installing rooftop solar on every hospital here in Wales by the predictable negative impacts of ■ converting thousands of houses to warm zero the Brexit fallout. This will impact most heavily on carbon homes each year poorer communities leaving them even more vulnerable. ■ replacing all diesel buses in Wales with electric Meanwhile both the ever-present Climate Emergency buses assembled in Wales and Nature Crisis become more urgent. Previous ‘once Wales Green Party’s Green New Deal will transform in a lifetime’ extreme weather events are happening Welsh society, providing Green jobs in a genuine with increasing regularity across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmarking of Existing Business / Operating Models & Best Practices
    SHared automation Operating models for Worldwide adoption SHOW Grant Agreement Number: 875530 D2.1.: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices This report is part of a project that has received funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement number 875530 Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above-referenced consortium members shall have no liability to third parties for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2020 by SHOW Consortium. This report is subject to a disclaimer and copyright. This report has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission, contract number: 875530. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the SHOW project. D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 2 Executive Summary D2.1 provides the state-of-the-art for business and operating roles in the field of mobility services (MaaS, LaaS and DRT containing the mobility services canvas as description of the selected representative mobility services, the business and operating models describing relevant business factors and operation environment, the user and role analysis representing the involved user and roles for the mobility services (providing, operating and using the service) as well as identifying the success and failure models of the analysed mobility services and finally a KPI-Analysis (business- driven) to give a structured economical evaluation as base for the benchmarking.
    [Show full text]
  • European Manifesto 2004
    EUROPEAN ELECTION MANIFESTO 2004 From our MEPs Real Progress: The future is Green A Message from Jean Lambert A Message from Caroline Lucas This manifesto puts forward a distinctive radical message that is based Contents Green MEP for London Green MEP for South East England on our core principles of ecological sustainability and economic justice. The EU needs the Greens. Hard-won gains Being elected as one of Britain’s first Green From our MEPs Inside front cover such as the commitment to sustainable MEPs has been a wonderful opportunity to In 1999, the British people elected two Green Party history. We want a social Europe, one that protects The future is Green 1 members of the European Parliament. In 2000, London workers, public services and minorities. We want a development and conflict prevention are at raise the profile of the Green Party and green returned three Green members of the London Assembly. commonsense Europe, one that works for the interests of Protecting our environment 2 risk if the Greens aren’t there to push policy politics in the UK and, working with In 2003, Scotland returned seven Green members of the all. An economy for people and planet 6 in that direction. It was teamwork between colleagues, to act as a catalyst for vitally Scottish Parliament. Greens in other countries have Some decisions are best made at a European level. We Safe food and sustainable farming 10 Green MEPs and environment ministers that needed change within the EU – for peace, ministers of state and members of national applaud the environmental, judicial and safety Transport 14 kept the Kyoto Protocol alive.
    [Show full text]
  • Car-Sharing Is Also Possible in Smaller Cities
    Car-Sharing in Small Cities Car-Sharing fact sheet No. 9 Car-Sharing is also possible in smaller cities Organised Car-Sharing is generally accepted as a mobility option for large cities. This fact sheet will demonstrate through several European examples that it is also possible to organise Car-Sharing in smaller cities and communities and to provide an acceptable level of service. In Switzerland, 410 localities are served by the Car-Sharing provider Mobility. Only the cities of Zurich, Geneva, Basel, Bern and Lausanne have more than 100,000 inhabitants. Four oth- ers (Winterthur, St. Gallen, Lucerne and Lugano) have between 50,000 and 100,000 inhabit- ants, and a further 4 have between 0,000 and 50,000. Thus the majority of Swiss locali- ties in which an outstanding level of Car-Sharing service is provided have fewer than 0,000 inhabitants. In Germany, 166 cities and communities served by Car-Sharing providers have fewer than 50,000 inhabitants and 78 communities have fewer than 0,000 (as of the middle of 008). Car-Sharing in smaller cities and commu- Car-Sharing services through the following nities can generally only be organised by measures: volunteers • They can become business customers of the We cannot overlook the fact that conditions Car-Sharing service and use it for their own in smaller cities are indeed more challenging. work-related travel. There, the concentration of people who are • They can reduce the economic risk in the ready to arrange their mobility without private start-up phase by guaranteeing (possibly for car and share cars with others is lower.
    [Show full text]
  • A City-Level Analysis of B2C Carsharing in Europe
    A city-level analysis of B2C carsharing in Europe Master’s thesis Jan Lodewijk Blomme Master’s program: Innovation Sciences Student number: 3642658 Email: [email protected] Telephone: +316 4419 6103 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Koen Frenken Second reader: Dr. Wouter Boon Date: May 13, 2016 A city-level analysis of B2C carsharing in Europe – Master’s thesis J. L. Blomme Summary Business to consumer (B2C) carsharing is a phenomenon that started in Europe in the 1940s but has gained in popularity quickly since the 1990s. This development is a welcome addition to the means that can be supported by local governments in order to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and curb congestion in cities. Cities have however experienced differences in the extent to which carsharing has been adopted in their area. This research uncovers several important city features that explain this differential adoption of carsharing in a city. This study uses the multi-level perspective (MLP) to distinguish between the contemporary car regime and the carsharing niche. Several indicators are identified that theoretically would weaken the regime and/or strengthen the niche in a city. These indicators are therefore expected to have a noticeable effect on the amount of shared B2C vehicles in cities, as the local car regime would be weaker. The research develops a unique database by collecting the amount of shared B2C cars online through carsharing operator (CSO) websites. Independent variables are in turn collected through various sources both on- and offline, including national statistics databases and Eurostat. Results are initially analyzed through bivariate correlations.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambiojournal Ausgabe 32 | Juli 2016
    cambioJournal Ausgabe 32 | Juli 2016 Foto: Marco Strack Foto: Foto: Abwrackprämie, jetzt also elektrisch Mit der Kaufprämie für E-Autos fördert der Bund erneut den individuellen Pkw-Besitz, denn der schleppen- de Absatz gefährdet die selbst gesteckten Ziele. Der Kaufanreiz nützt vor allem auch der Autoindustrie. Erinnern Sie sich noch an 2009? Fünf Mil­ Jeder soll sein eigenes haben Niedrige CO2-Werte wichtig für den Absatz liarden Euro gab es damals von der Bun des­ Wieder einmal wird großzügig der indivi­ an Premium-Fahrzeugen regierung für den Kauf von Neu wa gen, duelle Besitz an Fahrzeugen gefördert. Jeder Noch schaffen die Hersteller die Vorgaben wenn das alte Auto dafür abgewrackt wur­ soll sein eigenes haben – das bekannte Mo­ von derzeit 130 Gramm pro Kilometer. In de. Wenig später waren 3,8 Millionen na­ bilitätskonzept. Die Regierung nennt die Zukunft können sie aber nur mit deutlich gelneue Autos auf den Straßen unterwegs. Förderung »Anreize zur schnelleren Ver­ mehr verkauften E­Autos die neuen Grenz­ 500.000 mehr als in den Jahren zuvor. Nun brei tung dieser innovativen Techno logie.« werte einhalten. Und zwar mit folgendem soll erneut mit staatlichen Fördergeldern Sie erhofft sich, dass mit der höheren Nach­ Trick: Jedes CO2­arme Auto verringert die der Autokauf angekurbelt werden. Diesmal frage die Preise sinken und sich so mehr CO2­Bilanz der Gesamtflotte eines Her stel­ ist die Modell­Auswahl jedoch begrenzter: Käufer finden. Das mag umweltfreundli­ lers. Damit können weiterhin Fahr zeuge Nur Käufer von Elektro­ und Hybrid fahr­ cher sein, nach einem Aufbruch in eine an­ der Premiumklasse mit extrem hohen CO2­ zeugen profitieren.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Thèses Récentes Soutenues En Histoire Contemporaine (Février 2018)
    Les thèses récentes soutenues en histoire contemporaine (février 2018) Nous recensons ici un ensemble de thèses d’histoire contemporaine soutenues en 2017 (et de rares thèses plus anciennes qui nous avaient précédemment échappé) avec, lorsque nous avons pu trouver ces informations en ligne, nom, titre, université et date de soutenance, composition du jury et résumé de la thèse. La discipline de la thèse peut ne pas être l’histoire, tant que le sujet nous a semblé relever de l’histoire contemporaine. Ce recensement ne peut pas être complet, même si nous avons fait de notre mieux… Pour signaler une thèse soutenue après août 2017 et non recensée ici (elle sera annoncée dans la prochaine livraison) : - vérifiez d’abord qu'elle n'avait pas été annoncée en juillet 2017 : http://ahcesr.hypotheses.org/765 - remplissez ce formulaire : https://ahcesr.hypotheses.org/nous-signaler-une-soutenance-de-these - ou bien écrivez-nous : [email protected] Julie d’Andurain Stéphane Lembré Claire Lemercier Manuela Martini Nicolas Patin Clément Thibaud 1 Index des thèses ALIX, Sébastien-Akira, L’éducation progressiste aux Etats-Unis : histoire, philosophie et pratiques (1876-1919), thèse soutenue le 15 octobre 2016, à l’université Paris-Descartes. ARMAND, Cécile, « Placing the history of advertising » : une histoire spatiale de la publicité à Shanghai (1905-1949), thèse soutenue le 27 juin 2017 à l’ENS de Lyon. AUBÉ, Carole, La naissance du Sentier. L’espace du commerce des tissus dans la première moitié du XIXe siècle, thèse soutenue le 14 décembre 2017, à l’EHESS. AYACHE, Nadia, Maillage et implantation du Socialisme en Aquitaine (acteurs, réseaux, mobilisations électorales) de 1958 à la fin des années 1990, thèse soutenue le 7 novembre 2017, à l’université Bordeaux Montaigne.
    [Show full text]
  • Feine Sache Für Dienstreisende
    Geschäftswagen • Carsharing Text Stefan Bottler Bild DB Carsharing I Drive Carsharing I Cambio Feine Sache für Dienstreisende Kleine Karte, große Fahrt. Der Firmenmitarbeiter, der die Karte ans Lesegerät hinter der Windschutzscheibe hält, öffnet anschließend die Fahrzeugtür des Carsharing-Automobils und findet den Autoschlüssel im Handschuhfach vor. Zuvor haben er oder die Einkaufsabteilung im Internet alle wesentlichen Daten eingegeben. Carsharing ist im Aufwind: Über 100.000 Kun- zusätzlich zum bestehenden Fuhrpark einen im Register. „Rund 20 Prozent der Kunden sind den, darunter immer mehr Geschäftsreisende, Wagen benötigen, bis hin zu großen Dienst- gewerbliche Nutzer“, schätzt BCS-Geschäfts- nutzen dem Bundesverband Carsharing (BCS) leistern, Behörden, Banken etc.. Darunter z.B. führer Willi Loose. Mit rund 80 Mitgliedern in Hannover zufolge dieses Mobilitätskonzept, auch die Lufthansa, Sparkassen oder auch weist der Verband einen Organisationsgrad Tendenz stark steigend. In aller Stille hat sich Stadtverwaltungen, die schon mal per Dauer- von über 70 Prozent auf. die Branche zur ernstzunehmenden Alternati- auftrag ordern. ve für Miet- und Leasingfirmen entwickelt. Outlets und Kooperationspartner. Die bun- Längst ist Carsharing auch bei gewerblichen Ein Fünftel gewerbliche Kunden. So meldet desweiten Anbieter – außer DB Carsharing und Nutzern hoffähig. Spezielle Firmentarife ma- DB Carsharing, die Branchentochter der Deut- Cambio sind dies Drive Carsharing in Solingen chen diese Form alternativer Mobilität attraktiv. sche Bahn AG in Frankfurt, rund 500 Unterneh- und Greenwheels (vormals Stattauto) in Rot- Das Spektrum der Nutzer reicht vom Freiberuf- men und 15.000 Freiberufler, die Carsharing terdam – haben in vielen Städten eigene Outlets ler, der lediglich ein oder zweimal in der Woche regelmäßig nutzen. Mitbwerber Cambio Car- aufgebaut oder sind mit Kooperationspartnern einen Pkw fährt, über Handwerksbetriebe, die sharing, Bremen, zählt sogar rund 750 Firmen vertreten.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition Challenges in the Devolved Nation
    C ommunity E nergy in Wales Transition challenges in the devolved nation Thesis submission for Master in Global Energy Transition and Governance 2018/19 Author Thomas Lewis Supervisor Rachel Guyet Abstract Community energy is a form of energy production that revolves around democratic participation, shared profits, and common ownership, and is being reproduced all across Wales. The National Assembly for Wales does not have powers over energy, but still has significant control over how the transition from a centralised energy system to a decentralised one can be planned using competencies in other subjects. After 20 years of devolution, little research has been undertaken to see how this has specifically affected community energy projects, which is why this paper set out to explore what a transition is in theory, how it applies to the Welsh context, and whether the country could be doing more to aid this transition using the powers it currently has. Through understanding the actors in play and how they interrelate, the government is able to enact policy to support the growth of community energy groups through new funding mechanisms, investment in skills, and democratic inclusion. Devolution has benefitted the transition towards having more community energy groups and political will can be blamed for barriers currently being faced. Questions in the future need to be raised about whether new powers should be granted to Wales to give it more control over grid regulation following recent policy enacted by the central government. 1 This thesis is dedicated to both of my parents, Paul and Sara Lewis, who gave me the skills and the support needed to be able to work on what I find meaningful.
    [Show full text]