Transport Statistics: 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Abai, Oracle of Apollo, 134 Achaia, 3Map; LH IIIC
INDEX Abai, oracle of Apollo, 134 Aghios Kosmas, 140 Achaia, 3map; LH IIIC pottery, 148; migration Aghios Minas (Drosia), 201 to northeast Aegean from, 188; nonpalatial Aghios Nikolaos (Vathy), 201 modes of political organization, 64n1, 112, Aghios Vasileios (Laconia), 3map, 9, 73n9, 243 120, 144; relations with Corinthian Gulf, 127; Agnanti, 158 “warrior burials”, 141. 144, 148, 188. See also agriculture, 18, 60, 207; access to resources, Ahhiyawa 61, 86, 88, 90, 101, 228; advent of iron Achaians, 110, 243 ploughshare, 171; Boeotia, 45–46; centralized Acharnai (Menidi), 55map, 66, 68map, 77map, consumption, 135; centralized production, 97–98, 104map, 238 73, 100, 113, 136; diffusion of, 245; East Lokris, Achinos, 197map, 203 49–50; Euboea, 52, 54, 209map; house-hold administration: absence of, 73, 141; as part of and community-based, 21, 135–36; intensified statehood, 66, 69, 71; center, 82; centralized, production, 70–71; large-scale (project), 121, 134, 238; complex offices for, 234; foreign, 64, 135; Lelantine Plain, 85, 207, 208–10; 107; Linear A, 9; Linear B, 9, 75–78, 84, nearest-neighbor analysis, 57; networks 94, 117–18; palatial, 27, 65, 69, 73–74, 105, of production, 101, 121; palatial control, 114; political, 63–64, 234–35; religious, 217; 10, 65, 69–70, 75, 81–83, 97, 207; Phokis, systems, 110, 113, 240; writing as technology 47; prehistoric Iron Age, 204–5, 242; for, 216–17 redistribution of products, 81, 101–2, 113, 135; Aegina, 9, 55map, 67, 99–100, 179, 219map subsistence, 73, 128, 190, 239; Thessaly 51, 70, Aeolians, 180, 187, 188 94–95; Thriasian Plain, 98 “age of heroes”, 151, 187, 200, 213, 222, 243, 260 agropastoral societies, 21, 26, 60, 84, 170 aggrandizement: competitive, 134; of the sea, 129; Ahhiyawa, 108–11 self-, 65, 66, 105, 147, 251 Aigai, 82 Aghia Elousa, 201 Aigaleo, Mt., 54, 55map, 96 Aghia Irini (Kea), 139map, 156, 197map, 199 Aigeira, 3map, 141 Aghia Marina Pyrgos, 77map, 81, 247 Akkadian, 105, 109, 255 Aghios Ilias, 85. -
NEW EOT-English:Layout 1
TOUR OF ATHENS, stage 10 FROM OMONIA SQUARE TO KYPSELI Tour of Athens, Stage 10: Papadiamantis Square), former- umental staircases lead to the 107. Bell-shaped FROM MONIA QUARE ly a garden city (with villas, Ionian style four-column propy- idol with O S two-storey blocks of flats, laea of the ground floor, a copy movable legs TO K YPSELI densely vegetated) devel- of the northern hall of the from Thebes, oped in the 1920’s - the Erechteion ( page 13). Boeotia (early 7th century suburban style has been B.C.), a model preserved notwithstanding 1.2 ¢ “Acropol Palace” of the mascot of subsequent development. Hotel (1925-1926) the Athens 2004 Olympic Games A five-story building (In the photo designed by the archi- THE SIGHTS: an exact copy tect I. Mayiasis, the of the idol. You may purchase 1.1 ¢Polytechnic Acropol Palace is a dis- tinctive example of one at the shops School (National Athens Art Nouveau ar- of the Metsovio Polytechnic) Archaeological chitecture. Designed by the ar- Resources Fund – T.A.P.). chitect L. Kaftan - 1.3 tzoglou, the ¢Tositsa Str Polytechnic was built A wide pedestrian zone, from 1861-1876. It is an flanked by the National archetype of the urban tra- Metsovio Polytechnic dition of Athens. It compris- and the garden of the 72 es of a central building and T- National Archaeological 73 shaped wings facing Patision Museum, with a row of trees in Str. It has two floors and the the middle, Tositsa Str is a development, entrance is elevated. Two mon- place to relax and stroll. -
UN/LOCODE) for Greece
United Nations Code for Trade and Transport Locations (UN/LOCODE) for Greece N.B. To check the official, current database of UN/LOCODEs see: https://www.unece.org/cefact/locode/service/location.html UN/LOCODE Location Name State Functionality Status Coordinatesi GR 2NR Neon Rysion 54 Road terminal; Recognised location 4029N 02259E GR 5ZE Zervochórion 32 Road terminal; Recognised location 3924N 02033E GR 6TL Lití 54 Road terminal; Recognised location 4044N 02258E GR 9OP Dhílesi 03 Road terminal; Recognised location 3821N 02340E GR A8A Anixi A1 Road terminal; Recognised location 3808N 02352E GR AAI Ágioi Anárgyroi 31 Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 3908N 02101E GR AAR Acharnes A1 Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 3805N 02344E GR AAS Ágios Athanásios 54 Road terminal; Recognised location 4043N 02243E GR ABD Abdera 72 Road terminal; Recognised location 4056N 02458E GR ABO Ambelókipoi Road terminal; Recognised location 4028N 02118E GR ACH Akharnaí A1 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Approved by national 3805N 02344E government agency GR ACL Achladi Port; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC 3853N 02249E GR ADA Amaliada 14 Road terminal; Recognised location 3748N 02121E GR ADI Livádia 31 Road terminal; Recognised location 3925N 02106E GR ADK Ano Diakopto 13 Road terminal; Recognised location 3808N 02214E GR ADL Adamas Milos 82 Port; Request under consideration 3643N 02426E GR ADO Áhdendron 54 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 4040N 02236E GR AEF Agia Efimia Port; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC 3818N -
The Leases of the Laureion Mines
THE LEASESOF THE LAUREION MINES (PLATES 83-97) D URING the excavation of the Athenian Agora seventy-five fragments of the poletai inscriptions which record the leases of the silver mines at Laureion and the sale of confiscated property have been found. Two have already been published in Hesperia (V, 1936, no. 10, pp. 393-413, and X, 1941, no. 1, pp. 14-27). Eight frag- ments of this same series, all also found in Athens, are published in I.G., IJ2, 1582.-89. These previously published pieces have been included in the numerical series of texts here, which is arranged chronologically in so far as possible, and the data from them included in the index and chart. Amazingly few facts are known about the Laureion mines, so generally, and undoubtedly correctly, believed to have played a very important part in the rise and supremacy of Athens. What revenue did Athens get from them and how and when was this revenue collected? How were they administered? What was the term of the lease? What is the meaning of the different classifications? Who were the men who leased the mines? Any information that can be gained from these new texts is most welcome. It will be limited, by the inscriptions themselves, to the problems of the leases in the fourth century. All generalizations and conclusions are most tentative, based on the limited evidence now available from these very fragmentary texts. One or two rela- tively complete stelai from the third quarter of the fourth century, with dated heading preserved, would provide positive solutions to many questions and quite possibly solutions different from those suggested here. -
The Influence of the Physical Geography of Athens and of Rome Upon Their History
>' % < 1 , W.MIJAMS * - M The Influence of the Physical Geography of Athens and of Rome upon their History a s s i c s A. ML I o i c ZXJiKKOIS THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY The person charging this material is re- sponsible for its return to the library from which it was withdrawn on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for disciplinary action and may result in dismissal from the University. met UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN IGUS.EQNM BUILDING USE ONL"Y NOV 18 1374 * ft m NOV 19 974 m L161 — O-1096 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/influenceofphysiOOwill THE INFLUENCE OF THE PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY OF ATHENS AND OF ROME UPON THEIR HISTORY BY SUSAN KATHRYN WILLIAMS A. B. Carthage College, 1914 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN THE CLASSICS IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1915 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE GRADUATE SCHOOL . .(^. * 191 i~ I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPER- VISION BY ^±?:*?>: \Q3&±}ftx\ _ ENTITLED *\ cU ^bju^va^Ju^ ^.„/)t^«^*^.jfl |R<rvy\s _ BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE >H<Ufo, DEGREE OF </| 4^ In Charge of Thesis tMt^ Head of Department Recommendation concurred in :* Committee on Jfrr. Final Examination* *Required for doctor's degree but not for master's. -1- TABLE OF CONTENTS. ATHENS. I. The Development of the General Theory of the Effect of Physical Environment upon the Character of a People. -
The War Hitler Won: the Battle for Europe, 1939-1941
Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies The War Hitler Won: The Battle for Europe, 1939-1941 Robert Citino "A Distinctive Language": The German Operational Pattern In the fall of 1939, the German army (Wehrmacht) began a run of decisive victories that was quite unlike anything in living military memory. With their fearsome tank (Panzer) formations operating as an apparently irresistible spearhead, and with a powerful air force (Luftwaffe) circling overhead, the Wehrmacht ran through or around every defensive position thrown in its path. The opening campaign in Poland (Case White) smashed the Polish army in 18 days, although a bit more fighting was necessary to reduce the capital, Warsaw.1 Equally 1 For Case White, begin with the belated "official history" commissioned by the Militärgeschichtliches Forschungsamt, Das Deutsche Reich und Der Zweite Weltkrieg, volume 2, Die Errichtung der hegemonie auf dem Europäischen Kontinent (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1979), especially "Hitler's Erster 'Blitzkrieg' und seine Auswirkungen auf Nordosteuropa," pp. 79-156. Labeling this "official history" is misleading--it is far more a meticulously researched critical history by a team of crack scholars. Robert M. Kennedy, The German Campaign in Poland, 1939, Department of the Army Pamphlet no. 20-255 (Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 1956) continues to dominate the field, and Matthew Cooper, The German Army, 1933-1945 (Chelsea, MI: Scarborough House, 1978), pp. 169-176, is still useful. Both Pat McTaggart, "Poland '39," Command 17 (July-August 1992), p. 57, and David T. Zabecki, "Invasion of Poland: Campaign that Launched a War," World War II 14, no. -
Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece
Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece Vol. 40, 2007 LATE-AND POST-MIOCENE GEODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF THE MESOGEA BASIN (EAST ATTICA, GREECE): CONSTRAINTS FROM SEDIMENT PETROGRAPHY AND STRUCTURES Mposkos E. National Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Section of Geological Sciences Krohe A. University of Munster, Institute of Mineralogy, Laboratory for Geochronologie Diamantopoulos A. National Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Section of Geological Sciences Baziotis I. National Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Section of Geological Sciences https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.16627 Copyright © 2018 E. Mposkos, A. Krohe, A. Diamantopoulos To cite this article: Mposkos, E., Krohe, A., Diamantopoulos, A., & Baziotis, I. (2007). LATE-AND POST-MIOCENE GEODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF THE MESOGEA BASIN (EAST ATTICA, GREECE): CONSTRAINTS FROM SEDIMENT PETROGRAPHY AND STRUCTURES. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 40(1), 399-411. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.16627 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 07/06/2020 15:03:46 | http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 07/06/2020 15:03:46 | Δελτίο της Ελληνικής Γεωλογικής Εταιρίας τομ. ΧΧΧΧ, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece vol. XXXX, 2007 2007 Proceedings of the 11th International Congress, Athens, May, Πρακτικά 11ου Διεθνούς Συνεδρίου, Αθήνα, Μάιος 2007 2007 LATE-AND POST-MIOCENE GEODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF THE MESOGEA BASIN (EAST ATTICA, GREECE): CONSTRAINTS FROM SEDIMENT PETROGRAPHY AND STRUCTURES Mposkos E.1, Krohe A.2, Diamantopoulos A.1, and Baziotis I.1 1 National Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Section of Geological Sciences, [email protected] 2 University of Munster, Institute of Mineralogy, Laboratory for Geochronologie, krohe@nwz-uni-muenster. -
James-Jude: - 1 of 8 - NT227 03 of 03 03 LESSON Craig L
James-Jude: James-Jude: NT227 Letters to Everyone General & Johannine Epistles LESSON 03 of 03 Archaeology & New Testament Cities Craig L. Blomberg, Ph.D. Distinguished Professor of New Testament Studies at Denver Seminary in Littleton, Colorado I. Introduction to Archaeological Evidence (Part 3) In this section, we will examine additional archaeological dis- coveries that can provide valuable information about major New Testament cities. After examining the major sites, you will be ready to apply your newfound knowledge to your culminating research paper. II. Palestine There are many sites in Palestine associated with Jesus and the New Testament, but we will just look at three major archaeologi- cal sites: Capernaum, Caesarea Philippi, and Samaria. A. Capernaum Capernaum was one of the largest of the thirty fishing towns surrounding the Sea of Galilee, located some three miles from the estuary of the Jordan to the southwest. It was here that Jesus established His headquarters for the major portion of His public ministry (Mt 4:13). In Matthew 9:1, Capernaum is called “his own town.” The recent discovery of a Roman milestone at Capernaum helps to prove a Roman road ran by the city and explains the presence of a Roman centurion in a primarily Jewish town (Mt 8:5-13; Lk 7:1-10). As a port of entry for caravans from the rich East, it is also logical Capernaum should house an important customs house, whose officer was to become a disciple of Jesus (Lk 5:27-8; Mt 9:9). The English name “Capernaum” comes from the Greek form of the Hebrew name Kefar Nahum, meaning “village of Nahum.” This Nahum, otherwise unknown to us, may have originally owned the land where the village grew up. -
Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece
Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece Vol. 34, 2002 Geodynamics and evolution of the Miocene mineralization in the Cycladic - Pelagonian belt, Hellenides SKARPELIS N. Department of Geology, Section of Economic Geology & Geochemistry, University of Athens https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.16862 Copyright © 2018 N. SKARPELIS To cite this article: SKARPELIS, N. (2002). Geodynamics and evolution of the Miocene mineralization in the Cycladic - Pelagonian belt, Hellenides. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 34(6), 2191-2206. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.16862 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 21/04/2020 03:36:14 | Δελτίο της Ελληνικής Γεωλογικής Εταιρίας, Τομ. XXXIV/6, 2191-2206, 2002 Bulletin of the Geological Society ot Greece, Vol. XXXIV/6, 2191-2206, 2002 Πρακτικά 9ου Διεθνούς Συνεδρίου, Αθήνα, Σεπτέμβριος 2001 Proceedings of the 9th International Congress, Athens, September 2001 GEODYNAMICS AND EVOLUTION OF THE MIOCENE MINERALISATION IN THE CYCLADIC - PELAGONIAN BELT, HELLENIDES N. SKARPELIS' ABSTRACT The paper aims to provide a sound account of the type of Miocene mineralisations in the Cycladic - Pelagonian belt and their relationship with the geodynamic evolution of the area. Skarn and manto types, epithermal pre cious and base metals mineralisation, and vein magnesite in ultramafics are associated to distinct stages of the geodynamic evolution of the belt. Extensional tectonics favoured their generation. Late stages of extensional tectonics resulted in the formation of vertical to subvertical NW-SE trending fault zones, which were then used as conduits for ascending hydrothermal fluids. The relationship between the geodynamics and the metallogenetic evolution of the belt is discussed on the basis of available data on the geology of four critical areas: Tinos and Mykonos islands, Laurium and Northern Euboea. -
Silver in Greece
Silver Production in City/State of Ancient Athens Maxwell K. Boots, B.Sc. (Hon), PhD. Introduction. Much of what follows was sourced from the internet, however I remain responsible for the conclusions. During earlier research into the origins of silver and gold smithing, I came across many references about the first known “owl” coins that were minted in Greece from silver, commencing c580 BCE. Although these were not the first coins, they rekindled an interest in the silver history of Greece, especially about the geology of the mines in south- eastern Greece. The first known coins were made by the Lydians c700BCE (modern day-Western Turkey) using naturally occurring Electrum. Over 50 years ago I had sat through a lecture on the economic geology and processing of silver ores from the Laurion area of present day Greece, which is centered about 60km to the southeast of Athens. The Greeks appear to have the first real evidence of mining and processing on an intensive scale from their silver mines at Laurion which is an eastern sea port situated on a bay overlooking the island of Makronisos (in ancient times: Helena). The town is also known as Lavrio, Laureion or Laurium. Other small villages and towns of this area include Thoricus, Kamareza, Maronsa and Sounian. History of the mines. Although the start of silver mining in the Laurion area is not accurately known, it was probably commenced before the 3rd millennium BCE. This date has been ascertained because lead found in Egypt and dated to that time has been found to have the same isotope ratios, thus it originated from the Laurion area. -
Rhetoric and the Architecture of Empire in the Athenian Agora
Rhetoric and the Architecture of Empire inthe Athenian Agora Submitted by John Vandenbergh Lewis B.Arch., University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona May, 1992 Submitted to the Department of Architecture in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Architecture Studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June, 1995 John Vandenbergh Lewis, 1995. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. I A A Signature of the Author Jo Vandenbergh Lewis Depa* ent of Architecture, May 12, 1995 Certified by IrP u Julian Beinarl Professor of Architecture I Accepted by I I Roy Strickland Chairman, Department of Architecture Committee on Graduate Students MASSACHUSETTS INSTJTUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUL 251995 4ROtd Rhetoric and the Architecture of Empire inthe Athenian Agora by John Vandenbergh Lewis Submitted to the Department of Architecture May 12, 1995 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science inArchitecture Studies Abstract The various political regimes of ancient Athens established and legitimated their power through civic architecture and public rhetoric in the agora. A study of the parallel developments of architectural and rhetorical form, supported by previously published archaeological evidence and the well documented history of classical rhetoric, demonstrates that both served to propel democracy and, later, to euphemize the asymmetrical power structures of the Hellenistic and Roman empires. In addition, civic architecture and rhetoric worked in unison following analogous patterns of presentation in civic space. Civic imperial architecture in the agora may be thus understood to function as the stageset and legitimator of imperial political rhetoric in the agora. -
The Significance of Cape Sounion
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CAPE SOUNION The Importance of the Cape for the Broader Region of Sounion and the Athenian Polis Alexandros Mourtzos MA (Research) Thesis Ancient Studies Utrecht University Alexandros Mourtzos 5841763 [email protected] Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Josine Blok Dr. Floris van den Eijnde 21/6/2018 Cover Image: Mariketi Graikioti, Cape Sounion from the west. 2 CONTENTS Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1 The History of Cape Sounion, An Analysis ....................................................................... 11 1. 1 The Promontory (PLATE 1) ...................................................................................... 13 1. 2 The Sanctuary of Poseidon (PLATE 2) ...................................................................... 15 1.2.1 The Archaic Temple ................................................................................................ 17 1.2.2 The Classical Temple (PLATES 3-4) ......................................................................... 19 1.2.3 The Sanctuary’s Walls and other Structures .......................................................... 20 1.2.4 The Fort and Settlement ......................................................................................... 21 1.2.5 The Landfill and the Bothros ..................................................................................