DOCSLIB.ORG

CD05 Statement of Common Ground

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CD05 Statement of Common Ground This document was classified as: OFFICIAL Darlington Local Plan Statement of Common Ground December 2020 DARLINGTON ii wi BOROUGH COUNCIL 0 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Parties Involved 3 3. Signatories 4 4. Strategic Geography 10 5. Strategic Matters 11 - Housing Development 11 - Economic Growth 13 - Teesside International Airport 14 - Town Centre Development 16 - Services and Facilities 17 - Strategic Transport Infrastructure 18 - Natural Environment 21 - Historic Environment 22 - Gypsies and Traveller Accommodation 24 6. Governance Arrangements 25 7. Appendices 26 - Evidence of joint working - Local Authority Housing Requirements - Teesside International Airport Planning History - Teesside International Airport combined policies map - Adjoining Authorities Statements of Common Ground 1 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL 1. Introduction 1.1 This statement of common ground has been prepared to meet the requirements set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). Paragraph 27 of the NPPF states, authorities should prepare and maintain one or more statements of common ground, documenting the cross-boundary matters being addressed and progress in cooperating to address these. This ensures that the plan making process demonstrates effective and on-going joint working. 1.2 This is the first draft of the statement of common ground to be published alongside the emerging Local Plan. It is acknowledged that the statement should have been produced throughout the plan making process, however the Council has regularly contributed to and signed statements from other authorities over recent years including Hambleton District Council, Stockton on Tees Borough Council and Durham County Council. These statements have been utilised to inform this document and updated to reflect continued discussions on strategic issues which remain the same. It has not been possible to create an identical statement of common ground for all of the adjoining authorities covered in this statement due to the different geographies, varying cross boundary issues and the different stages of plan preparation. Prior to the submission of the Local Plan to the Planning Inspectorate (as at 21st December 2020) all signatories have confirmed that they remain in agreement with the contents of the statement. 1.3 A statement of common ground is a written record of the progress made during the process of planning for strategic cross-boundary matters. It documents where effective co-operation is and is not happening throughout the plan-making process and is a way of demonstrating at examination that plans are deliverable over the plan period, and based on effective joint working across local authority boundaries. For Darlington Borough Council it also forms part of the evidence required to demonstrate that we have complied with the duty to cooperate. 1.4 The approach taken in preparing this statement is in accordance with the requirements of the National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG). It is important to note that this is a working document, reflecting the fact that co-operation is ongoing in relation to the issues identified and that this will evolve as plan making progresses across all of the local planning authorities identified below. 2 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL 2. Parties Involved 2.1 The authorities with local plan making responsibilities that are signatories to this statement are: - Stockton on Tees Borough Council - Durham County Council - Hambleton District Council - Richmondshire District Council 2.2 Additional signatories to the statement are: - North Yorkshire County Council 3 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL 3. Signatories 3.1 This section sets out for each signatory organisation the name of the organisation and the name, position and signature of that organisation’s representative. 3.2 Unless otherwise stated each Local Planning Authority is a full signatory to the statement. For each of the additional signatories the strategic matters that are agreed are identified in their respective sections below. 4 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL Stockton on Tees Borough Council On behalf of Stockton on Tees Borough Council I confirm that there is common ground on adopted and draft planning policies and there are no unresolved strategic issues as set out in this statement Signed: Date: 22/12/20 Name: Garry Cummings Position Director of Finance, Development and Business Services 5 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL Durham County Council behalf of Durham County Council I confirm that there is common ground on adopted and draft planning policies and there are no unresolved strategic issues as set out in this statement Signed: ~ft) Date: 18 December 2020 Name: Amy Harhoff Position Corporate Director - Regeneration, Economy & Growth 6 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL Hambleton District Council On behalf of Hambleton District Council I confirm that there is common ground on adopted and draft planning policies and there are no unresolved strategic issues as set out in this statement Signed: Date: 18/12/2020 Name: James Campbell Position Planning Policy Manager 7 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL Richmondshire District Council On behalf of Richmondshire District Council I confirm that there is common ground on adopted and draft planning policies and there are no unresolved strategic issues as set out in this statement Signed: Bart Milburn Date: 17th December 2020 Name: Bart Milburn Position Planning Manager. 8 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL North Yorkshire County Council behalf of North Yorkshire County Council I confirm that there is common ground on the strategic issues identified in section 5 (strategic matters), in so far as they relate to North Yorkshire County Council's responsibilities, including those as the neighbouring Local Highway Authority and Local Education Authority and there are no unresolved strategic issues as set out in this statement. Signed: ~ Date: 17 December 2020 Name: Matt O'Neill Position Assistant Director - Growth, Planning & Trading Standards 9 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL 4. Strategic Geography 4.1 The Statement of Common Ground relates to the Local Planning Authority area covered by Darlington Borough Council and the adjoining Local Planning Authorities: - Stockton on Tees Borough Council - Durham County Council - Hambleton District Council - Richmondshire District Council 4.2 This also includes the adjoining upper tier authority North Yorkshire County Council. 4.3 The map below identifies the location and extent of the area covered by the statement. It also shows the other Tees Valley authorities which are covered by the Tees Valley Combined Authority but are not signatories to this statement. Darlington does have linkages with the other Tees Valley authorities, however it was not considered necessary to include them in this statement in terms of identifying key strategic cross boundary planning matters. 4.4 The area extends over the administrative area of all the plan making authorities that have a common boundary with Darlington. In doing so it reflects key linkages with the surrounding authority areas in terms of travel to work patterns, Housing Market Area relationships and strategic cross-boundary issues. C] County Durham C] Tees Vall ey Combined Authority C] North Yorkshire County Council Durham Redcar & Cleveland Borough Richmondshire District Hambleton District llWi~-~----~DAR LINGTON Plan produced by the Planrung Policy Div1S1on, E00tn1Uc Growth D. N QCrownQ'XN'll)l't.-ld~rlOl't•20l9~SV,,,y010002372$ Figure 1: Map illustrating area covered by the statement 10 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL 5. Strategic Matters 5.1 Joint working to address strategic matters has been ongoing throughout the plan making process and is set out in the Consultation Statement. It is also summarised in Appendix 1: 'Evidence of Joint Working'. This work has identified a number of strategic areas that have the potential to raise cross boundary issues and are outlined in this chapter. The position on each of these issues is outlined below. Housing Development 5.2 The housing market area (HMA) covering Darlington is complex with the south and west part of the authority containing the town of Darlington strongly linked to North Yorkshire, while the northern and eastern part of Darlington Borough is closely linked with areas of Stockton on Tees and County Durham. 5.3 Census data shows that in terms of residents currently living in Darlington (12 months prior to the census) 65% had moved there from another address within Darlington. The data also shows that those who previously lived in Darlington, 67.4% who moved stayed within the local authority. Travel to work areas indicate a close alignment between Darlington and the local authority boundary. Broad rental market areas indicate that there is one housing market area in Darlington, which also extends into relatively low populated areas of County Durham and Richmondshire. 5.4 The evidence suggests that it is sensible for Darlington to be considered as a HMA in itself. Further detail can be found in the Darlington Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) 2020. This view is consistent with the previous SHMA for Darlington and the Local Plan Examinations in Public for County Durham, Stockton on Tees, Hambleton and Richmondshire, where inspectors did not seek to include Darlington in their HMA. 5.5 The Darlington SHMA was produced by Opinion Research Services (ORS)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consultation Relating to the Structure of Local Government in North Yorkshire
    REPORT TO: Council DATE: 14 April 2021 SERVICE AREA: Chief Executive’s Office REPORTING OFFICER: Chief Executive (Wallace Sampson) SUBJECT: Consultation relating to the structure of local government in North Yorkshire WARD/S AFFECTED: ALL DISTRICT FORWARD PLAN REF: N/A 1.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the Secretary of State’s consultation on proposals for Local Government Review; to seek a response to the invitation to Harrogate Borough Council to comment on the North Yorkshire Proposal as consultee; and to consider making any further comment on the East/West proposal that Harrogate Borough Council resolved to submit to the Secretary of State which is now under consultation. 2.0 RECOMMENDATION/S 2.1 Members note that the Secretary of State is consulting on two proposals for re-organisation in the North Yorkshire area. 2.2 Members note that the consultation exercise is not a vote for one proposal over another. It is an opportunity to comment on the merits of both proposals and how they do (or do not) meet the Secretary of State’s guidance criteria. 2.3 Members note that ultimately this is a decision for the Secretary of State who has indicated that the approach to local government reorganisation should be locally led. 2.4 Members note that they can respond in their individual capacity as an elected member and in this regard members are referred to https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposals-for-locally-led- reorganisation-of-local-government-in-cumbria-north-yorkshire-and- 1 somerset/consultation-on-proposals-for-locally-led-reorganisation-of-local- government-in-cumbria-north-yorkshire-and-somerset 2.5 Members decide whether they wish the Council to: (a) Respond to the consultation questions in relation to the district council East/West proposal or whether they feel that the existing submission has already addressed the consultation questions; and/or (b) Respond to the consultation questions in relation to the North Yorkshire County Council proposal; and/or (c) Respond to neither.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmondshire District Council Transforms Email Security and Data Privacy Footing to Refocus on Innovation
    Case Study Richmondshire District Council Transforms Email Security and Data Privacy Footing to Refocus on Innovation The North Yorkshire-based council transformed its email security and At a Glance data privacy footing while slashing Company: email management time to allow a • Supports 220 email users in 16 sites. focus on innovation in technology- • The council was seeking to secure its Exchange enabled service delivery • 2016 environment against advanced email threats including impersonation attacks. Richmondshire District Council is a local government body in North Yorkshire, • It needed a secure archive to take the pressure off local storage. England. It covers a large northern area of the Yorkshire Dales and must consistently • Content controls were required to prevent data leaks and aide GDPR compliance. deliver a wide range of public services – from revenues and benefits and homelessness Richmondshire District Council is a local government body in North Yorkshire, England. It provides the services to environmental health, planning, local population with a wide range of public services waste and recycling, and more. The – from revenues and benefits and homelessness services to environmental health, planning, waste and scale of the council’s operations, which recycling, and more. are headquartered in Richmond with 14 Products: smaller sites, means email is a primary Email Security, Archiving communicationtool both within the council and to interact with the public. www.mimecast.com | ©2020 Mimecast | All Rights Reserved | UK-1656 Richmondshire District Council Transforms Email Security and Data Privacy Footing to Refocus on Innovation For ICT & Business Change Manager, “We handle all the emails ourselves, from Graeme Thistlethwaite, that means keeping Exchange at the backend right across the email on is a major priority: “It is our main board for around 220 users,” he explained.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmondshire District Council
    What happens next? We have now completed our review of Richmondshire District Council. April 2018 Summary Report The recommendations must now be approved by Parliament. A draft order - the legal document which brings The full report and detailed maps: into force our recommendations - will be laid in Parliament. consultation.lgbce.org.uk www.lgbce.org.uk Subject to parliamentary scrutiny, the new electoral arrangements will come into force at the local elections in @LGBCE May 2019. Our recommendations: The table lists all the wards we are proposing as part of our final recommendations along with the number of Richmondshire voters in each ward. The table also shows the electoral variances for each of the proposed wards, which tells you how we have delivered electoral equality. Finally, the table includes electorate projections for 2023, so you can see the impact of the recommendations for the future. District Council Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements Ward Number of Electorate Number of Variance Electorate Number of Variance Name: Councillors: (2017): Electors per form (2023): Electors per from Councillor: average % Councillor: Average % Catterick & 3 4,783 1,594 7% 5,008 1,669 4% Brompton-on- Swale Colburn 2 2,245 1,123 -25% 3,228 1,614 1% Croft & 2 2,872 1,436 -4% 2,949 1,475 -8% Middleton Tyas Gilling West 1 1,692 1,692 13% 1,713 1,713 7% Hawes, High 1 1,504 1,504 1% 1,522 1,522 -5% Abbotside & Upper Swaledale Hipswell 2 2,957 1,479 -1% 3,058 1,529 -4% Leyburn 2 2,934 1,467 -2% 3,266 1,633 2% Lower 1 1,455 1,455 -3% 1,462 1,462 -8% Who we are: Why Richmondshire? Swaledale & ■ The Local Government Boundary Commission for ■ Richmondshire District Council submitted a Arkengarthdale England is an independent body set up by Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby CCG Profile
    January 2019 North Yorkshire Joint Strategic Needs Assessment 2019 Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby CCG Profile Introduction This profile provides an overview of population health needs in Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby CCG (HRW CCG). Greater detail on particular topics can be found in our Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) resource at www.datanorthyorkshire.org which is broken down by district. This document is structured into five parts: population, deprivation, disease prevalence, hospital admissions and mortality. It identifies the major themes which affect health in HRW CCG and presents the latest available data, so the dates vary between indicators. Summary Life expectancy is higher than England. For 2011-2015, female life expectancy in HRW CCG is 84.2 years (England: 83.1), and male life expectancy is more than three years lower than for females at 80.9 years (England: 79.4) [1]. There is a high proportion of older people. In 2017, 25.1% of the population was aged 65 and over (36,100), higher than national average (17.3%). Furthermore over 4,300 (3.0%) were age 85+, compared with 2.3% in England. [2] Some children grow up in relative poverty. In 2015, there were 10.8% of children aged 0-15 years living in low income families, compared with 19.9% in England [1]. There are pockets of deprivation. Within the CCG area, 3 Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs) out of a total of 95 are amongst the 20% most deprived in England. One of them is amongst the 10% most deprived in England, in the Whitby West Cliff ward [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Happy New Year! News: Staffing Update Carol-Ann Howe - Head of Inclusion Support Services;
    Communication and Interaction Team Newsletter Spring Term 2018 The Communication and Interaction Team are part of NYCC’s Inclusive Education Service, offering sup- port to educational settings for children and young people with Communication and Interaction diffi- culties. We are a team of Consultants, Specialist Teachers and Specialist Practitioners , comprising of a central team and professionals within Enhanced Mainstream Schools. We have a wide range of back- grounds, specialisms and experience including, Speech and Language therapy, Early Years, Autism and Psychology across the 0-25 age range. We provide a range of educational interventions and support for children and young people with speech, language, communi- cation and interaction needs. This includes children and young people with Autism, Developmental Language Disorder, Selec- tive Mutism, dysfluency and communication aid users. We also offer support and advice around a range of Social, Emotional and Mental Health needs and difficulties. Children and young people do not require any formal diagnosis to receive support from our team, we are a needs based service. Referrals should be made using a ‘Request for Involvement’ form see: http:// cyps.northyorks.gov.uk/special-educational-needs-disabilities . SEND mainstream guidance and details of the IES core and ex- tended offer can also be found on this webpage. Details on advice and specialist support for a child or young person with spe- cial educational needs or disabilities (SEND) can be found here: NYCC Local Offer: https://www.northyorks.gov.uk/send-
    [Show full text]
  • Right of Review
    North Yorkshire Choice Based Lettings Partnership Right of Review ‘To provide increased choice in housing to residents in North Yorkshire and help to create sustainable, mixed communities where people choose to live.’ Aug 2014 v1 Right of Review - Review Panel Process Right of Review Under the North Yorkshire Homechoice (NYHC) Common Allocation Policy applicants have a right of review in respect of a decision regarding their application. A review is when you feel the NYHC policy has been applied incorrectly resulting in an incorrect decision being made about your Home Choice application, including Access to the register, by either eligibility or qualification Banding Allocation of a property Cancelled application For clarification: A complaint, is when you feel that you have not received an acceptable service. eg your phone calls have not been returned. If you believe this has occurred and you want to take further action you should contact the partner landlord dealing with your application and follow their complaints procedure. See Appendix 1 for contact details of our partner landlords. This right of review does not apply to complaints. First review by Partner Landlord / Participating Landlord Any applicant who disagrees with a decision in relation to the NYHC policy should in the first instance, contact the partner landlord who made the decision and request a first review. The first review will be carried out by an officer of senior rank to the person that made the original decision and who will have had no previous involvement. Each partner will follow their internal procedures in respect of the first review.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Project on Fuel Poor Households
    To: Citizens Advice Mid-North Yorkshire From: YES Energy Solutions Date: 28/6/2018 Research: Fuel poor households with no central heating in North Yorkshire Foreword ‘A study to identify householders with no central heating facilities that are most likely to be living in fuel poverty in Craven, Hambleton, Harrogate, Richmondshire, Ryedale, Scarborough and Selby.’ Contents 1. Overview p3 2. Research objectives p3 3. Funding opportunities p3 4. Methodology p4 4.1 Process p4 4.2 Fuel Poor LSOAs p4 4.3 Considerations p4-5 4.4 EPC data p5 5. Statistics – all areas p6 5.1 Homes with no central heating p6 5.2 Urban & Rural Split p6 5.3 General observations (All Areas) p7 6. Craven p8 6.1 Urban – Craven p9 6.2 Rural – Craven p10 7. Hambleton p11 7.1 Urban – Hambleton p12 7.2 Rural – Hambleton p13 8. Harrogate p14 8.1 Urban – Harrogate p15 8.2 Rural – Harrogate p16 9. Richmondshire p17 9.1 Urban – Richmondshire p18 9.2 Rural – Richmondshire p19 10. Ryedale p20 10.1 Urban – Ryedale p21 10.2 Rural – Ryedale p22 11. Scarborough p23 11.1 Urban – Scarborough p24 11.2 Rural – Scarborough p25 12. Selby p26 12.1 Urban – Selby p27 12.2 Rural – Selby p28 13. Warm Homes Fund Bid p29 13.1 Urban - WHF Bid p30 - 31 13.2 Rural - WHF Bid p32 - 33 14. Data sets p34 Page 2 of 34 Overview YES Energy Solutions has been commissioned by Citizens Advice Mid-North Yorkshire to identify fuel poor households with no central heating facilities in seven Local Authority areas in North Yorkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003
    Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England October 2003 Contents Introduction 1 Executive Summary 4 Local Communities 6 Defining Communities 6 Identifying Communities 6 Identity with the Local Community in the Hambleton District Council Area 7 Overall Identity 7 Effective Communities 9 Involvement 13 Affective Communities 16 Bringing Effective and Affective Communities Together 17 Local Authority Communities 19 Belonging to Hambleton District Council Area 19 Belonging to North Yorkshire County Council Area 22 Knowledge and Attitudes towards Local Governance 25 Knowledge of Local Governance 25 Involvement with Local Governance 26 Administrative Boundary Issues 26 Appendices 1. Methodology – Quantitative 2. Methodology - Qualitative 3. Sub-Group Definitions 4. Place Name Gazetteer 5. Qualitative Topic Guide 6. Marked-up Questionnaire Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Introduction Research Aims This report presents the findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England (referred to in this report as "The Committee") in the Hambleton District Council area. The aim of this research is to establish the patterns of community identity in the area. Survey Coverage MORI has undertaken research in all 44 two-tier district or borough council areas in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions. The research covers two-tier
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Representatives Army Foundation College Steward Mr Steven Knowles Broadacres Steward Mr Mark Norman Broadacres Health & Safety Rep
    Workplace Representatives Army Foundation College Steward Mr Steven Knowles Broadacres Steward Mr Mark Norman Broadacres Health & Safety Rep. Mr Mark Norman Caedmon College Steward Ms Rebecca Hobbs Citizens Advice Steward Mr Jose Roversi Graham School Steward Ms Nicola Laxton Hambleton District Council - Bedale Leisure Centre Health & Safety Rep. Mr Steven Abbott Hambleton District Council - Bedale Leisure Centre Steward Mr Steven Abbott Hambleton District Council - Civic Centre Steward Mrs Julie Biggins Hambleton District Council - Lesiure Centre Steward Mr Andrew Coulthard Hambleton District Council - Lesiure Centre Health & Safety Rep. Mr Andrew Coulthard Harrogate High School Health & Safety Rep. Mr Garry Frost Harrogate High School Steward Mrs Susan Darling Harrogate High School Steward Mr Garry Frost Humberside, Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire CRC Steward Mr Stephen Timmins Humberside, Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire CRC Health & Safety Rep. Mr Stephen Timmins Humberside, Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire CRC Steward Ms Pauline Wilkinson King James School Steward Mrs Susan Recchia Mowbray School Steward Mrs Rachel Brotherston North Yorkshire Moors National Park Health & Safety Rep. Mr Andrew Muir North Yorkshire Moors National Park Steward Mr Simon Bassindale Northallerton School & Sixth Form College Steward Mr Mark Shepherd Norton College Steward Mr Richard Kellett NYCC - Castle House Steward Mr David Griffiths NYCC - Colburn Medical Centre Steward Ms Ruth Appleby NYCC - Colburn Medical Centre Health & Safety Rep. Ms Ruth Appleby NYCC
    [Show full text]
  • Hambleton District Council Climate Change Comprehensive Risk Assessment 2011
    Hambleton District Council Climate Change Comprehensive Risk Assessment 2011 Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Methodology 3 3. Key risks to Hambleton from a changing climate 4 4. LCLIP evidence for Hambleton District 4 5. UKCP09 predictions for Hambleton District Council 4 6. Summary of key risks to Hambleton District Council from a changing 5 Climate 7. Hambleton District Council Service Based Comprehensive Risk 8 Assessment 8. Hambleton District Council Climate Adaptation Action Plan 11 9. Conclusion 13 Appendix 1 – Detailed Methodology 14 Appendix 2 – Acknowledgements 15 Acronym: Hambleton District Council - HDC 2 1. Executive summary Services throughout Hambleton District Council will be affected in the future by episodes of weather extremes and Regional Improvement and Efficiency Partnership (RIEP) funded two local government officers to come into North Yorkshire Authorities to interview key council department representatives to understand what can be done at a service level to adapt each individual Authority against future disruption which will cost time and money. A weather extreme assessment examining the past five years was carried in 2010 by AECOM to understand past weather extreme events in Hambleton. This report indicates that the great majority of impacts in Hambleton are caused by excessive rainfall (65%) and snow and blizzards (26%). Extreme weather events in Hambleton district have impacts on service delivery and affect different services in both positive and negative ways. The challenge is to proactively work to find solutions to enable services to run continually throughout the year and overall to consider climate change adaptation in the decision making process. During the interview process several positive actions were generated by the individual services which indicates how Hambleton District Council can progress the weather extreme adaptation agenda in the near future to reduce the risk on business continuity and the time and cost constraints associated with a reduce or postponed service.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Ref: 0254.2018-19 Your Ref: Date: 25 June 2018 Civil Disclosure Joint Corporate Legal Services
    Our Ref: 0254.2018-19 Your Ref: Date: 25 June 2018 Civil Disclosure Joint Corporate Legal Services Claire Wilde <[email protected]> Dear Ms Wilde, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: 0254.2018-19 I write in connection with your request for information which was received by North Yorkshire Police on 26 May 2018. I note you seek access to the following information: For each of the three years (2015, 2016, 2017) could I have: 1. The number of crimes reported, broken down by policing district and by crime type; 2. The number of crimes which resulted in charges, broken down by policing district and by crime type. Extent and Result of Searches to Locate Information To locate the information relevant to your request searches were conducted within North Yorkshire Police. I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by North Yorkshire Police. Decision I have today decided to disclose the located information to you. 1. Please find below the number of crimes reported, broken down by crime type and district. Crime District 2015 2016 2017 Total Arson & Criminal Damage Blank 3 8 6 17 Craven District Council 313 273 254 840 Hambleton District Council 469 494 494 1,457 Harrogate Borough Council 912 1,135 1,280 3,327 Richmondshire District Council 266 221 234 721 Ryedale District Council 244 268 227 739 Scarborough Borough council 1,259 1,257 1,192 3,708 Selby District Council 579 543 630 1,752 York City Council 1,590 1,576 1,580 4,746 Arson & Criminal Damage 5,635 5,775 5,897 17,307 Jane Wintermeyer
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Opinion
    SCOPING OPINION: Proposed Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage Project Case Reference: EN010103 Adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State pursuant to Regulation 10 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 April 2019 [This page has been intentionally left blank] ii Scoping Opinion for Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage Project CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Planning Inspectorate’s Consultation............................................. 2 1.3 Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union .......................................... 3 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 4 2.2 Description of the Proposed Development ............................................ 4 2.3 The Planning Inspectorate’s Comments ............................................... 5 3. ES APPROACH............................................................................... 9 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 9 3.2 Relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs)......................................... 9 3.3 Scope of Assessment ..................................................................... 10 3.4 Confidential
    [Show full text]