Crowdfunding Community Projects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crowdfunding Community Projects Crowdfunding Community Projects Elizabeth Treutel Crowdfunding is becoming a popular method of fundraising for entrepreneurs, high-tech start-ups, non-profit projects, and, Master of Urban Planning 2014 increasingly, community projects. As city governments across the country and world continue to suffer financially, community betterment projects like parks and trails become lower priorities. In turn, community organizers have begun taking matters into their 30 own hands. This paper presents crowdfunding as both a transfor- mative tool to catalyze community redevelopment and a potential liability for social justice and government responsibility. I describe Matireal, a crowdfunded community connector trail in Milwaukee, as a case-study for analysis. n an era where local governments are encourage government investment. In its design continuously tightening budgets and cutting and concept, Matireal is a privately funded programs, innovative planning interventions public project. Iare often the first projects cut. The poorest municipalities are often the communities Why Crowdfunding? with the highest level of need and the most disadvantaged populations. Crowdfunding, Matireal uses an innovative approach to an online funding mechanism through which address a multitude of social, economic, a great many individuals contribute relatively and environmental issues that the City’s tax small amounts of money to support a company, revenue cannot cover. When city governments are working with lean budgets and struggling project, or initiative, is quickly gaining strength to provide basic services to residents, these with community organizers and grassroots types of community-based projects often go planners as an intervention technique to finance un-funded to make way for more vital budget these essential community improvements. items. Fiscal issues are no longer a problem limited to rust-belt cities of the Midwest, but Introduced in the late 1990s and highly a national and global phenomenon. Cities popularized within the last five years, from Los Angeles to London are experiencing crowdfunding has primarily been used to fund financial hardships similar to those of many start-up entrepreneurial projects that often Detroit-like cities. Municipal financial hardships have a creative or digital focus (Mollick, 2013). can be blamed on a host of factors including poor regional tax policy, migration patterns, The widespread success and popularity of racial and socio-economic housing segregation, crowdfunding has promoted the flexible funding suburbanization, a weak property tax base, mechanism for everything from mission trips poor city leadership, misaligned financial to real estate development. Crowdfunding for priorities, and shifting land use patterns. The community-based projects, therefore, seems to crowdfunding model, specifically as used for be a natural fit. Matireal, addresses the needs and desires of the community that municipal governments are Through crowdfunding, individuals invest unable to meet. relatively small amounts of money into various sized projects, initiatives, or organizations in About Matireal, a ‘Creational Trail’ return for a pre-determined donor gift. In some cases, donors receive a share in the claim to Matireal is about connecting neighborhoods through art and recreation. The Matireal project future assets of the entity (Startup Exemption, founder, Keith Hayes, formed the organization 2013). In short, crowdfunding expands and “beintween” soon after the introduction of the replaces traditional “angel investors,” or persons design concept for Matireal with the mission to who contribute a large sum of money to support “make [art] do [work]” (Matireal, 2012). The trail, a new company or project, with a large pool of constructed of a geotextile made of recycled tire individual investors to attain the seed capital for material, gravel, and grasses, was completed a project (NLCFA, 2012). in November 2013. It reclaims a divested 2.4- mile rail corridor and connects two diverse Today, many non-profits, community neighborhoods over a rail bridge. The public art development groups, and individuals are gallery component of Matireal is currently in the development process. utilizing crowdfunding mechanisms to initiate improvement efforts in their own Once a more integrated community, the neighborhoods, which essentially serve as Harambee and Riverworks neighborhoods were public projects. I will explore one example, a severed by a four-lane highway and became recent project in Milwaukee, Wisconsin called segregated racially and socio-economically. “Matireal, a ‘Creational Trail.’” Matireal is a The highway has also created an unsafe pattern 31 multi-use trail built with a geotextile composed where pedestrians frequently attempt to cross of recycled tires, which contains a linear, public the busy thoroughfare via the divested rail art gallery called the “Artery” running along bridge. When completed, Matireal will form a an old rail corridor connecting neighborhoods linear art-based park through the rail corridor throughout the City. The project has utilized and rail bridge to reconnect the neighborhoods physically and culturally. The project aims to Kickstarter, an online crowdfunding platform, “engage all people… and break down major to complete the first phase of the project and AGORA 8 social, cultural, economic and racial boundaries space that anyone in the community can freely by stitching these along the artery” (Matireal, access (Spacehive, 2013). Past projects include 2012). The project is a “simple, low-tech creating a picnic area and garden in a park revitalization concept that works within a in Lancashire and renovating a vacant store neighborhood” using an innovative, sustainable, into a community street art gallery in Bristol and socially just planning intervention that the (Spacehive, 2013). Spacehive is unique because, City would not initially fund (Matireal, 2012). unlike Kickstarter, it is geared specifically toward projects that must be open to the public. Matireal launched itself into Kickstarter, the This prevents projects from discriminating largest online crowdfunding platform, on against certain users or excluding traditionally October 29, 2012. While project planning and allowed public uses. design had begun almost a year prior, the project hit a wall when attempts to obtain large Fundrise, another funding method, gives investments or City or Federal grants to fund individuals the ability to directly invest in their the project fell apart (beintween, 2013). Matireal neighborhoods through local commercial real founders needed funds for the first step in the project: to purchase a shipping container to use If the crowdfunding model for material storage and advertising (Matireal, 2012). They reached their crowdfunding goal of becomes commonplace… this $10,000 in less than a month with 230 backers could legitimize… the permanent (Matireal, 2012). With a total of $11,296 pledged, shifting of responsibility from backers received various gifts dependent on localities to provide basic public their pledge levels, ranging from a “sincerely amenities[.] written Thank You from the founders” for a $5 contribution, to “500 square feet of the estate development. Although not necessarily geotextile” (for use in personal driveways or a platform for funding public projects, it other projects) for contributions of $2,500 or allows individuals to invest without the fees more (Matireal, 2012). and middlemen of conventional real estate equity finance (Fundrise, 2013). In short, After the crowdfunded investment allowed residents can invest relatively small amounts the group to purchase shipping containers and of money into commercial real estate in their move forward with research and development neighborhoods, own a share in the action (with of the geotextile, the City of Milwaukee and the proportional financial returns), and help realize Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources their visions for their communities (Fundrise, (DNR) were willing to provide some support to 2013). Three neighborhood projects have been the project. The City and the Wisconsin DNR funded and are now underway in Washington assisted with land acquisition, the donation D.C., including the building at 406 H Street of recycled tires to create the geotextile, NE, which will transform a vacant building construction permits, and safety provisions into an ethnic restaurant (Fundrise, 2013). for the project. Without the initial capital Fundrise allows residents to take ownership of investments from Kickstarter investors, the their neighborhood, literally and figuratively; City or State would probably not have been however, it may also promote gentrification willing or able to provide assistance. In the case and, at this point, still requires leadership from of Matireal, crowdfunding investment allowed larger developers to guide the management, the innovative project to gain traction with the programming, and design of the project. community, which encouraged government entities to provide assistance. Citizinvestor allows municipalities to raise money through crowdfunding in order to Other Examples of Crowdfunded move forward on projects shelved by budget Community Projects shortfalls (Citizinvestor, 2012). To use this online crowdfunding platform, the projects require Aside from Kickstarter, one can find many evaluation by a local government and approval 32 other examples of crowdfunding platforms by the appropriate department, and solely lack used for
Recommended publications
  • Crowdfunding Online Portal - Its Insights and Implication on Funding Success
    © 2019 JETIR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Crowdfunding online portal - its insights and implication on funding success Lavanya R.N. Assistant professor, T.John Insitute of Management and Science. In the present scenerio, crowdfunding individuals collectively contributing money to back different goals and projects through the internet has proven to be a viable alternative for raising funds. Businesses, entrepreneurs, and individuals are using this alternative fundraising mechanism to raise finances to support their businesses, creative projects, or personal goals. Evidence of very successful fundraising campaigns (e.g. Pebble smart watches on Kickstarter.com) and unsuccessful fundraising campaigns exist. Different factors have been attributed to driving fundraising campaign outcomes - goal size, fundraising duration, creator’s network size, and signals of quality. Despite the growing importance and popularity of the crowdfunding mechanism,. Keywords Crowdfunding, Debt-based ,Funding ,Financing, Reward based. Crowd funding is a funding technique that encompasses financing a project with relatively modest contributions from a huge group of persons, rather than looking for considerable sums from a small number of investors. The funding campaign and transactions are typically conducted online through dedicated crowd funding sites, often in conjunction with social networking sites. Depending on the project, campaign contributors may be essentially making contributions, capitalizing for a potential future return
    [Show full text]
  • Moneylab Reader: an Intervention in Digital Economy
    READER A N INTERVENTION IN DIGITAL ECONOMY FOREWORD BY SASKIA SASSEN EDITED BY GEERT LOVINK NATHANIEL TKACZ PATRICIA DE VRIES INC READER #10 MoneyLab Reader: An Intervention in Digital Economy Editors: Geert Lovink, Nathaniel Tkacz and Patricia de Vries Copy editing: Annie Goodner, Jess van Zyl, Matt Beros, Miriam Rasch and Morgan Currie Cover design: Content Context Design: Katja van Stiphout EPUB development: André Castro Printer: Drukkerij Tuijtel, Hardinxveld-Giessendam Publisher: Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam, 2015 ISBN: 978-90-822345-5-8 Contact Institute of Network Cultures phone: +31205951865 email: [email protected] web: www.networkcultures.org Order a copy or download this publication freely at: www.networkcultures.org/publications Join the MoneyLab mailing list at: http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/moneylab_listcultures.org Supported by: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (Hogeschool van Amster- dam), Amsterdam Creative Industries Publishing and the University of Warwick Thanks to everyone at INC, to all of the authors for their contributions, Annie Goodner and Morgan Currie for their copy editing, and to Amsterdam Creative Industries Publishing for their financial support. This publication is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. EDITED BY GEERT LOVINK, NATHANIEL TKACZ AND PATRICIA DE VRIES INC READER #10 Previously published INC Readers The INC Reader series is derived from conference contributions and produced by the Institute of Network Cultures. They are available in print, EPUB, and PDF form. The MoneyLab Reader is the tenth publication in the series.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling up Partnerships
    SCALING UP PARTNERSHIPS A blueprint for the implementation of match-funding schemes between public authorities and crowdfunding platforms. A publication of the multi-stakeholder working group Crowdfunding for European Structural and Investment Funds at EUROCROWD - INSPIRING TOMORROW‘S FINANCE - WWW.EUROCROWD.ORG Ag Scaling Up Partnerships: A blueprint for the implementation of match-funding schemes between public authorities and crowdfunding platforms Editor: Francesca Passeri, EUROCROWD Contributors: Martina Lodi, KICK-ER / Carlo Allevi, WeAreStarting / Charlotte Brandsma, Growfunding / Chiara Rotulo, Goteo / Yoann Nesme, PPL / Angelo Rindone and Marta Dall’Omo, Produzioni Dal Basso / Ingi Rafn Sigurdsson, Karolina Fund / Oriol Sans, ACCIÓ / Elisa Patriarca, EUROCROWD Copyright © EUROCROWD (European Crowdfunding Network AISBL) 2021 All rights reserved. We encourage the use of our own data, publications and multimedia products (sound, image, video, etc.) in line with our Use of EUROCROWD Material policy as set out in our terms and conditions which can be accessed here https://eurocrowd.org/conditions/ European Crowdfunding Network Neo Building, Rue Montoyer 51, Box 7 1000 Brussels, Belgium [email protected] https://eurocrowd.org/ SCALING UP PARTNERSHIPS | June 2021 | EUROCROWD.org – 2 – TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 8 SECTION 1 - SETTING THE CONTEXT 10 Functioning mechanisms of crowdfunding 12 Crowdfunding and public authorities: a reference framework 14 Common match-funding structures 16 Matching crowdfunding
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding and Its Interaction with Urban Development
    Crowdfunding and its Interaction with Urban Development CHEN Hung-Yi1 Crowdfunding is a mechanism of fundraising on the Internet without a conventional financial institution as agency, especially for small and middle enterprises (SMEs). This is an intermediary system for people raising funding much more easily and efficiently. The difficulties for SMEs to raise funding from capital market are universal problems in the world. Under consideration of efficient fundraising, Malaysia, Taiwan and Thailand are already provided regulation toward crowdfunding. The financial authority of China and Singapore are also drafting the bill of crowdfunding in early 2015. With the development of crowdfunding for several years, it also provides citizens an alternative way to participate public affair and raise capital they need. In 2014, there is a crowdfunding campaign by citizens in Taiwan which raise up 11,984,994 TWD (around 387,481 USD) from 11,523 people only in 45 hours to organize a group recalling three controversy congressmen representing of Taipei city. This campaign was not held by any parties or organizations but a combination of citizens who did not know each other before. This campaign successfully promotes the idea of citizens by using crowdfunding to engage public affair by citizens. This is an innovative way for citizens having more opportunities to engage public affair. Additionally, there are some local governments in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom using crowdfunding to fulfill the gap of insufficient budget and also attract citizens invest their funding into public projects. Moreover, there are drafting bills in Hawaii and New Jersey for government using crowdfunding to raise capital for public projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on Urban Infrastructure Finance Dr
    Handbook on Urban Infrastructure Finance Dr. Julie Kim, Senior Fellow, New Cities Foundation WITH SUPPORT FROM: Handbook on Urban Infrastructure Finance Dr. Julie Kim, Senior Fellow, New Cities Foundation This report was written as part of the Financing Urban Infrastructure Initiative and published in April 2016. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein are the Foundation’s. Please cite this publication as: Kim, Julie, New Cities Foundation (2016), Handbook on Urban Infrastructure Finance [online: http://bit.ly/NCFUrbanFinance] You can copy, download, or print this report for your own use, and you can include excerpts from New Cities Foundation publications, databases, and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations blogs, websites, and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of the New Cities Foundation as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Request for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the New Cities Foundation. Photo credits for cover page: Denver Bike Lanes - Flickr © Mark Danielson | South Lake Union Streetcar, Seattle - Flickr © Curtis Cronn | Goethals Bridge Reconstruction project, New York/New Jersey - Wikipedia © US Cost Guards | Agua Espraiada - Flickr © Jornal SP Zona Sul | Plenary Properties Long Beach LLC (Developer), Edgemoor Infrastructure and Real Estate and Clark Construction (Contractor), Skidmore Owings & Merrill (Architect) | N-33 Road Project, Netherlands - Royal BAM Group © Aerophoto EELDE | London CrossRail project - Flickr © Department for Transport | Carlsbad desalination plant © Kleinfelder | FasTracks Commuter and Light Rail Project, Denver - Wikipedia © vxla | Rio Operations Center, Rio de Janeiro - Flickr © World Resources Institute | Hobart Airport, Tasmania - Wikipedia © R773 | Atlanta Beltline, Atlanta - Rails-to-Trails Conservancy © Ryan Gravel courtesy of Atlanta Beltline Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    SPECIAL EDITION TRANSFORMING CITIES From The Economist 2013 - 2014 In this issue: Concrete jungles Boomtown slum Factory women Going underground Brazilian housing Contents Reprinted from The Economist, 2013 - 2014 3 TRANSFORMING CITIES Foresight needed for a better urban world Cities: Opportunities and challenges Infrastructure: Filling critical gaps 4 Urbanisation 20 Trains in Nigeria The city triumphs, again A slow but steady chug 4 Cities 20 A continued infrastructure boom Concrete jungles Going underground 6 Natural disasters 21 Pollution in China Counting the cost of calamities Clearing the air 9 The protest around the world The march of protest Rapidly urbanising regions The search for new solutions 10 Upwardly mobile Africa 22 Housing in Brazil Boomtown slum If you build it 13 Kenya’s slum dwellers 23 Social entrepreneurs in India Tangles over tenure Water for all 14 Property in Mumbai 23 Civic crowdfunding The minimum city Breaking ground The human face of urbanisation 16 France’s troubled suburbs Forgotten in the banlieues SPECIAL EDITION TRANSFORMING CITIES 16 Factory women From The Economist 2013 - 2014 Girl power 17 Poverty and food The nutrition puzzle In this issue: Concrete jungles Boomtown slum Factory women Going underground Brazilian housing For more information about “Transforming cities” please go to www.VisionariesUnbound.com 2 From the conveners Reprinted from The Economist, 2013 - 2014 Transforming cities: Foresight needed for a better urban world Building bridges across sectors for innovative and enduring solutions MANY OF US live in cities, in sprawling, dense areas, pushing the undesirable facets of urban living rife with horrors, the slightest fallback plunging and socially diverse places that are the fabric of on others.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding Reshaping the Crowd’S Engagement in Culture
    Crowdfunding Reshaping the crowd’s engagement in culture Crowdfunding Reshaping the crowd’s engagement in culture AUTHORS OF THE STUDY Isabelle De Voldere, IDEA Consult (Project coordinator) Kleitia Zeqo, IDEA Consult PROJECT TEAM Eveline Durinck, IDEA Consult Pierre Padilla, IDEA Consult Kathrin Kohl, ECN Oliver Gajda, ECN Markus Chandler, Ecorys Jakub Gloser, Ecorys Tim Fox, Ecorys Joost Heinsius, Values of Culture Sylvia Amann, Inforelais The research team would like to thank all the stakeholders that have contributed to the research by sharing their valuable expertise and insights during the interviews, workshops and online DISCUTO process. EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Directorate D – Culture and Creativity Unit D.1 – Cultural Policy Contact: DG EAC Unit D.1 E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the European Commission; however, it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*) : 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 ISBN 978-92-79-67975-9 doi: 10.2766/011282 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Image(s) © image #298767080.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding: Exposing the Link Between Projects and Reward Mechanisms
    Crowdfunding: Exposing the link between projects and reward mechanisms CROWDFUNDING “Exploring the link between projects and reward mechanisms” Candidate: Sofia Alexandra Cardoso André dos Santos Advisor: Professor Juan Andrei Villarroel Fernandez, PhD [email protected] Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of MSc in Business Administration, at the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, June 2013 Crowdfunding: Exposing the link between projects and reward mechanisms ABSTRACT CROWDFUNDING: EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN PROJECTS AND REWARD MECHANISMS Sofia Alexandra Cardoso André dos Santos Crowdfunding is a recent organizational phenomenon for which there is little academic research. More than just offering a categorization of the crowdfunding reality, the aim of this study is to unveil the ways in which projects and rewards are linked across the global crowdfunding scenario. For the purpose of this study, several crowdfunding platforms were reviewed, with the focus of analyzing project characteristics such as owners, type and intent and finding a connection between the referred variables and the reward schemes which were commonly associated with them. The findings pointed out significant differences and clear reward preferences among the different project owners’ profiles and even among the different types of projects categories present in the crowdfunding platforms. Ultimately, the reader will be able to understand the links between project features and reward mechanisms and how they play out in the crowdfunding scenario. Moreover, they will be able to identify what type of rewards they may expect from a specific project type. This can be of great relevance for seekers and backers, since it clarifies what rewards a platform will offer taking into account the projects it promotes.
    [Show full text]
  • IDC Finance Technology Conference 20 Ekim 2016
    FinTech İstanbul Platformu Prof. Dr. Selim YAZICI Co-Founder FinTech Istanbul @SelimYazici IDC Finance Technology Conference 20 Ekim 2016 Nedir bu FinTech? Girişimcilik dünyasında 2014 yılından beri en çok duyulan kelime: “FinTech” Bankacılık Sigortacılık “Finansal HİZMET” sağlamak için “TEKNOLOJİ” kullanımı ! Aracı Kurumlar FinTech Neden Gündemde? Finans dünyasına, dijitalleşme ile çözüm: “Yeniden Yapılanma” Dijital kanallardan anında; hızlı esnek bireysel çözümler sunar FinTech Neden Gündemde? “Dijital Dönüşüm” Dijital kanallardan anında; hızlı esnek bireysel çözümler sunar FinTech Finansal Hizmetler Dünyasını Yeniden Şekillendirecek “Korkunun Ecele Faydası Yok” • Önümüzdeki 5 yıl içinde global FinTech yatırımlarının 150 Milyar USD’yi aşması bekleniyor. • FinTech’ler %100 müşteri odaklı • Müşterinin çektiği acıyı biliyorlar • Yeni iş modelleri ile yeni ürün ve hizmetleri getiriyorlar • FinTech Startupları geleneksel şirketlerin işlerini tehdit edebilir • Blockchain Teknolojisi çok şeyi değiştirecek Çözüm: “Rekaberlik” Dünyada FinTech Sadece Aralık 2015’de 81 FinTech girişimi 1 milyar USD yatırım aldı. 894 224 Sadece Google, son 5 yılda 37 farklı FinTech 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 yatırımı yaptı Son 5 yılda FinTech odaklı girişim sermayesi (VC) sayısı Dünyada FinTech Yatırımları DEsignED BY POWERED BY PIERRE DREUX Fintech Landscape Banking & Payment (356) Investments (108) Financing (196) Insurance (82) Banking (54) P2P Lending (49) Banking Personal Finance Investment P&C Reinsurance (6) Platforms Mobile Virtual Banking (9) - Expense
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs The benefits and challenges of using crowdfunding to facilitate community-led projects in the context of digital civics Journal Item How to cite: Gooch, Daniel; Kelly, Ryan; Stiver, Alexandra; van der Linden, Janet; Petre, Marian; Richards, Michael; Klis- Davies, Anna; MacKinnon, Jessica; Macpherson, Robbie and Walton, Clare (2020). The benefits and challenges of using crowdfunding to facilitate community-led projects in the context of digital civics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 134 pp. 33–43. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2019 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Accepted Manuscript Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.10.005 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk The Benefits and Challenges of Using Crowdfunding to Facilitate Community-led Projects in the Context of Digital Civics Daniel Gooch1;a, Ryan M. Kellyc,a, Alexandra Stivera, Janet van der Lindena, Marian Petrea, Mike Richardsa, Anna Klis-Daviesb, Jessica MacKinnonb, Robbie Macphersonb, Clare Waltonb aSchool of Computing and Communications, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK bCommunity Action: MK, Acorn House, Milton Keynes, UK cSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Abstract Digital technology is increasingly being used to bring citizens and communi- ties together to address local concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding for Local Authorities
    how to... Crowdfunding for local authorities part of our how to guide series on finance and local economic growth Introduction Crowdfunding has created a frenzy in the business community and the creative sector because of its ability to raise money quickly and flexibly, bypassing traditional sources of finance. But it has yet to become as widely adopted among local authorities. This is in large part down to the fact that councils are rightly cautious about new fads when it comes to handling public money. However, much of this caution comes from confusion about what exactly crowdfunding is, how it can be used in a local government context and how to weigh its risks and benefits. We hope to shed some light on this area so that people working in local government can make informed choices about if and how to get started. There are three main types of crowdfunding: ● Donations-based crowdfunding ● Equity crowdfunding ● Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending These work in different ways that are accessible to different organisations and groups. This guide will help you to unpick the different types of crowdfunding, their uses within and outside local government, and contains practical tips for those who wish to give crowdfunding a try. While this is still new territory for local government, it is cheering to note that crowdfunding is already working well for many councils as we mention throughout the guide. It holds the potential to raise money for local charities and social projects, to earn higher interest on council savings, to plug funding gaps for services and to support local businesses and the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Crowdfunding Processes Through the Looking Glass of Participation
    Civic crowdfunding processes through the looking glass of participation An exploration into the role and effects of citizen participation in civic crowdfunding processes Colophon Alexandra Craciun MSC Thesis Spatial Planning ©Wageningen University and Research June 2020 Land Use Planning Group MSC Landscape Architecture and Planning, Specialization Spatial Planning Course number: LUP-80436 Contact information Postbus 47 6700 AA Wageningen The Netherlands Phone: +31 317 486 187 Fax: +31 317 419 000 E-mail: [email protected] Author ©Alexandra Craciun Student number: 880817164110 Contact: [email protected] / [email protected] Supervisor: Dr. Iulian Barba-Lata All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of either the author or the Wageningen UR Land Use Planning Chairgroup. This publication is written as a final master thesis in spatial planning by order of the chairgroup of land use planning at Wageningen University. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The decision to further my education at Wageningen University and research came from the desire to be able to have a larger specter of understanding of the issues that spatial planning and landscape architecture is facing in the current socio-political scene. The entire experience was inspiring, as this program helped me become a more critical researcher and a more realistic yet no less of an innovative planner. This research started as a natural and (apparently) simple option for my thesis. But it was a whirlwind that took me years to complete, all the while re-assessing not only my research and my methods, but also myself as a person.
    [Show full text]